Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
More and more Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) are used to treat unstable angina pectoris (UAP) in China. There has been one protocol and one review about TCM for UAP according to the report from Cochrane Heart Group. Assessing the methodological quality is necessary to help reviewers and clinicians conducting Cochrane systematic reviews (CSR) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this field in the future.Objective:
to assess the methodological quality of RCTs about Chinese medicinal herbs for UAP in China.Methods:
89 journals of Chinese medicine were hand searched. All the journals were searched until the latest issue of 2004.The earliest journal was from 1977. 4 Chinese databases were electronic searched (CMCC, CMBDISK, CJFD and VIP). Two reviewers read and analyzed all of the included trials independently (Kappa=0.93).Results:
175 RCTs were included. Sample size in every RCT was small(varied from 25 to 120).1. All trials were described as randomized but the method of randomization were well described in only 13 trials (7.43%). The rest trials didnÂt mention the definite randomization method (92.57%);
2. Inclusion criteria were reported in 169 trials (96.57%) while exclusion criteria were reported in only 46 trials (26.28%);
3. None of the trials reported allocation concealment;
4. None of the trials gave a description of withdrawals and dropouts. No intention-to-treat was reported;
5. only 5 trials performed blinding (2.86%) and they were single-blinded.