Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Rural primary care providers (PCPs) are challenged to answer clinical questions and keep up-to-date with best evidence resources like the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Personal digital assistants (PDAs) with good clinical decision support software and concise pre-validated reviews are common, but their use has not been assessed among rural PCPs.Objectives:
Test the feasibility and effectiveness of providing the CDSR and other best evidence resources at the point of clinical decision-making with PDAs in rural primary care.Methods:
Pre-post experimental pilot study design was completed in rural primary care clinics in Tennessee. Subjects were 11 non-academic family physicians, general internists, nurse practitioners in fulltime rural practice. Subjects were trained to use PDAs and InfoRetriever software - that contained the abstracts of all the CDSRs - in their practices for 6 consecutive months. Training focused on:1. use of pre-validated summaries and abstracts of systematic reviews; and
2: 'clinical rules', a function of InfoRetriever that used interactive evidence-based tools with algorithms to assist the PCP with clinical decisions about individual patients.
The training highlighted three common 'tracer' conditions (sore throat/pharyngitis, sinusitis, ankle injury). Outcomes included all the clinical decisions from chart data for each of three 'tracer' conditions for the 6-months post training versus the same 6 months the prior year. These included prescribing antibiotics for sore throat/pharyngitis or sinusitis, and ordering an x-ray for acute ankle injury. Secondary outcomes were other clinical decisions (e.g., other treatments and tests) and the actual usage of InfoRetriever, automatically recorded by the software.