Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Cochrane authors are expected to become familiar with the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook; a complex software package: Review Manager (RevMan) 4.2 and a highly structured prescriptive way of writing a systematic review. The Cochrane editorial process is collaborative, involving a high level of input from editors, peer reviewers and consumers.Cochrane reviews are a significant commitment for authors. Authors must not duplicate work already published or registered in The Cochrane Library. They must first register a title; publish a protocol and then publish a systematic review. The completed review must then be updated every two years.
We noticed that even with the multitude of instructional materials available for Cochrane authors: CARGs Tips for authors; The Cochrane Reviewers Handbook; the Collaboration Open Learning Material and Cochrane workshops; authors still made the same basic errors. These errors lead to a great deal of work on the part of the editorial team; frustration and disillusionment for the authors and can potentially lead to serious publication errors.