Improving practice: Rx for Change - an intervention research database for healthcare decision-makers and researchers

Article type
Authors
Grimshaw JM1, Hill S2, Worswick J3, Mayhew A3, Fiander M3, Lowe D4, Taylor M5, Wu J3, Belanger D6
1Cochrane Canada, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Canada
2Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, La Trobe University, Australia
3Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada
4Centre for Health Communication and Participation, La Trobe University, Australia
5Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Australia
6Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Canada
Abstract
Background: Improving health care often requires changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals and consumers. While there is abundant evidence available on the effects of behaviour change strategies across diseases, populations and systems, it is difficult for decision-makers and others to reliably access and assess. The Rx for Change (www.rxforchange.ca) database attempts to close the gap between research discovery and program implementation by gathering and translating the evidence from systematic reviews into a single accessible package to inform healthcare decision-makers.

Objectives: To describe the Rx for Change database and disseminate evidence gathered on the effectiveness of interventions designed to change professional practice and medicines use by consumers.

Methods: We identify, analyse, summarise and report our findings from included systematic reviews using standardised methods. We organise and present this data using a multi-layer format. Using intervention categories developed by two Cochrane Review groups, we provide summaries of the evidence found for each intervention, list all systematic reviews that address each intervention topic with corresponding quality scores, describe and summarise results and conclusions from each individual review, and provide links to the reviews and their trials.

Results: Updated eight times since 2007, the database contains summaries of key findings for 310 systematic reviews, and summaries and statements of effectiveness for 39 intervention categories the reviews addressed. Examples of particularly effective interventions include distribution of educational materials and use of educational meetings to improve professional practice, as well as use of decision aids to minimise risks or harms to improve consumers’ use of medicines. Research gaps are evident in 11 intervention categories.

Conclusions: Rx for Change is an internationally recognised, publicly available intervention research database. It provides up-to-date evidence to guide healthcare decision makers towards effective intervention strategies. Guidelines and other policy, program and research initiatives can potentially be informed by this resource.