Using theory to guide synthesis of qualitative research: why, how and what would this mean for me?

Tags: Workshop
Garside R1, Thomas J2, Noyes J3, Hannes K4
1Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group/ University of Exeter, 2CQIMG, #cochranetech (EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, London), 3Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group, 4Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group / KULeuven

Description:

Analyses and syntheses of qualitative research often make use of theory. A 'theory' is a coherent and systematic description of a set of issues, communicated as a meaningful whole. In synthesis, theory can be used in a number of ways such as: framing a research question; as a lens through which to view the findings; or as a way to propose explanations for the findings.

But what does this mean in practice? And how could I use this approach in my reviews?

Objectives:

This discussion forum will:

- introduce the reasoning for the use of theory in reviews, and explore strengths and weaknesses;

- link with findings from the Methods Innovation Fund MICCI project, during which examples of when and how theory was used in systematic reviews were collated;

- illustrate and compare different approaches undertaken by the forum facilitators, both in Cochrane Public Health Reviews and non-Cochrane reviews, to use theory in order to try and understand how activities and programmes may have an effect and what the impact of different pathways might be;

- facilitate group work in which participants will work to derive and present explanations for their own research topics on which to base their review - don’t worry if you don’t have a live topic, we can supply examples.