Rapid Review workshop: timely evidence synthesis for decision makers

Article type
Authors
King V1, Polisena J2, Garritty C3, Stevens A4, Heise T5, Griebler U6, Mütsch M7, Lhachimi S8, Gartlehner G9, Flatz A10, von Elm E10, Puhan M11, Busert L12
1Rapid Review Methods; OHSU Center for Evidence-based Policy
2Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
3Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Instit.
4Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
5ebph | Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen - BIPS
6Cochrane Austria
7Cochrane Public Health Europe, University of Zurich, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute
8Research Group Evidence Based Public Health (University Bremen/BIPS)
9Cochrane Austria, Austria
10Cochrane Switzerland, Switzerland
11Airways Group, Switzerland
12European Satellite of the Cochrane Public Health Group, Germany
Abstract
Objectives: Rapid reviews (RRs) are increasingly employed as a research synthesis tool to support timely evidence-informed decision-making. Some of the facilitators hope to register a Cochrane RR Methods Group to help define their conduct and use. This workshop aims: 1) to introduce the concept of RRs; 2) to develop an understanding of the utility of RRs as an evidence synthesis product; 3) to detail methodological approaches; and 4) to provide practical experience using Cochrane Reviews for RR development.
Description: In small groups, participants will be presented with an real-life emergent public health issue as prepared by the European Satellite of the Cochrane Public Health Group, requiring a timely decision and asked to address this issue using a RR approach either from the perspective of a health authority, or from the vantage point of a team developing a RR protocol. Participants will consider question development, recommend an appropriate search strategy and selection criteria including the incorporation of Cochrane Reviews, data analysis, type and feasibility of syntheses, potential biases, internal and external validity. In addition, we will explore logistical considerations, report layout and customization, transparency, and communication of policy implications to decision makers. Participants will understand issues involved in the conduct of RRs to inform urgent public health decisions and how RRs fit into the spectrum of review methods.