Article type
Year
Abstract
Background: International research collaboration is desirable as it broadens perspectives, increases funding opportunities and improves visibility. However, in contrast to the view that geographic boundaries are falling due to globalization, international research collaboration can be difficult to establish. Research coordinators frequently require previous publications and experience from interested researchers or even rank applicants by affiliation. Cochrane Task Exchange plays a unique role in connecting researchers from around the world, regardless of academic titles, affiliations, publication records or previous experience. During pandemics, resulting networks can contribute to rapid-learning health systems.
Objectives: To describe and assess the experience of establishing a research network via Cochrane Task Exchange during the novel coronavirus pandemic.
Methods: Two posts were published on Cochrane Task Exchange, in January and March 2020, calling for researchers interested in collaborating with other Cochrane members on conducting a systematic review about COVID-19. All applications were appraised by the call issuer, based on candidates’ interests, aspirations, and availability for short- and long-term contributions. Selected candidates were included in an online instant messaging group to discuss research purposes and ongoing projects. Assessment of performance will be based on research output. Participants’ experience will be based on an online survey containing 14 open- and 2 closed-ended questions. It will be uploaded onto Google Forms to evaluate applicants’ experience of using Cochrane Task Exchange and collaborating with the research group.
Results: Overall, 39 candidates applied, volunteering to join the research collaboration through Cochrane Task Exchange. Eleven candidates contacted the team supervisor directly and expressed willingness to help. Many candidates (63%) did not reply to further e-mail contact after their initial application. Finally, eleven candidates were selected to be part of the team based on their availability and personal interest in the topic. As of April 1, 2020, the group remains and has so far published two systematic review protocols, one scoping review with meta-analysis, submitted for publication one overview of systematic reviews, and is currently finishing an update of the first review. Experience, so far, has shown that clear descriptions of the team’s expectations should be planned in advance, as well as descriptions of individual roles for each participant, in order to avoid a posteriori conflicts regarding involvement. Results from the survey will be presented at the Colloquium.
Conclusions:Cochrane Task Exchange is an excellent online platform for connecting people from all over the world who need help and are willing to collaborate in research projects, and by doing so contribute to efforts to make the world a better place.
Patient or healthcare consumer involvement: Not applicable.
Objectives: To describe and assess the experience of establishing a research network via Cochrane Task Exchange during the novel coronavirus pandemic.
Methods: Two posts were published on Cochrane Task Exchange, in January and March 2020, calling for researchers interested in collaborating with other Cochrane members on conducting a systematic review about COVID-19. All applications were appraised by the call issuer, based on candidates’ interests, aspirations, and availability for short- and long-term contributions. Selected candidates were included in an online instant messaging group to discuss research purposes and ongoing projects. Assessment of performance will be based on research output. Participants’ experience will be based on an online survey containing 14 open- and 2 closed-ended questions. It will be uploaded onto Google Forms to evaluate applicants’ experience of using Cochrane Task Exchange and collaborating with the research group.
Results: Overall, 39 candidates applied, volunteering to join the research collaboration through Cochrane Task Exchange. Eleven candidates contacted the team supervisor directly and expressed willingness to help. Many candidates (63%) did not reply to further e-mail contact after their initial application. Finally, eleven candidates were selected to be part of the team based on their availability and personal interest in the topic. As of April 1, 2020, the group remains and has so far published two systematic review protocols, one scoping review with meta-analysis, submitted for publication one overview of systematic reviews, and is currently finishing an update of the first review. Experience, so far, has shown that clear descriptions of the team’s expectations should be planned in advance, as well as descriptions of individual roles for each participant, in order to avoid a posteriori conflicts regarding involvement. Results from the survey will be presented at the Colloquium.
Conclusions:Cochrane Task Exchange is an excellent online platform for connecting people from all over the world who need help and are willing to collaborate in research projects, and by doing so contribute to efforts to make the world a better place.
Patient or healthcare consumer involvement: Not applicable.