Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Researchers often wish to identify which individuals benefit more (or less) from interventions; this idea underpins the concept of stratified medicine. As single studies are typically underpowered for exploring whether participant characteristics determine an individual’s response to treatment, meta-analysis can provide a solution. Whilst individual participant data provide the most power and analytical flexibility to investigate interactions between such characteristics and the intervention effect, aggregate data (AD) can also often be used. However, approaches to the analysis, presentation and interpretation of interactions vary widely.Objectives:
In this workshop we aim to demystify interactions in meta-analysis and show how they can be explored using AD. Participants will(i) understand the purpose of subgroup and interaction analysis in trials and meta-analysis, as well as its strengths and limitations;
(ii) explore the concept of aggregation bias and its consequences for interaction testing;
(iii) extract and calculate a simple “within-trial” interaction effect using AD;
(iv) understand how to use AD trial data to calculate subgroup effects compatible with “within-trial” interaction effects; and
(v) explore how to present these interactions and subgroup effects clearly using novel implementations of forest plots.
Material and examples are taken from Fisher et al., BMJ 2017 doi:10.1136/bmj.j573, and Godolphin et al., Research Synthesis Methods 2023 doi:10.1002/jrsm.1590.