Meta-analyses of trials with low and high risk of bias in the randomisation domain may yield substantially different results

Article type
Authors
Strandell A1, Bergh C1, Bernhardsson S1, Hongslo Vala C1, Jivegård L1, Petzold M1, Sjögren P1, Wallerstedt SM1, Wartenberg C1
1HTA-centrum, Region Västra Götaland
Abstract
Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) imply random allocation of participants to an intervention or a control group. When assessing risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool, the randomisation domain is crucial and may separate RCTs into low and high risk of bias.

Objectives: To compare meta-analyses of RCTs with low and high risk of bias in the randomisation domain.

Methods: A systematic review was performed within a health technology assessment (HTA) evaluating the effects of progesterone (Intervention) versus placebo (Comparison) in singleton pregnancies (Participants) regarding the Outcomes preterm birth (