Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Hierarchical methods recommended (Leeflang et al 2008) for meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies are complex, relying on iterative procedures for the estimation of multiple model parameters. In certain circumstances, for instance when there are few studies in a meta-analysis, such models may not converge or produce unstable parameter estimates.Objectives:
To evaluate the performance of meta-analytic approaches for test accuracy studies when few studies are available, and to develop recommendations for proceeding with meta-analysis when the suggested hierarchical methods fail.Methods:
Ten-thousand meta-analysis datasets were simulated for each of a range of realistic scenarios that varied according comparisons of the accuracy of diagnostic tests to important factors, including: the number of studies, numberof patients within studies, disease prevalence, and heterogeneity in threshold and accuracy across studies. A variety of meta-analysis models were fitted and performance was assessed according to the bias, mean-square error and coverage of parameter estimates.