Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Rapid reviews (RRs) are increasingly employed as a research synthesis tool to support timely evidence-informed decision-making. However, the methodology used to develop RRs is still emerging.
Objectives:
This introductory workshop aims to:
1) introduce the concept of RRs as differentiated from traditional systematic reviews (SRs);
2) impart an understanding of the utility of RRs as an evidence synthesis product;
3) give a high-level overview of methodological approaches to RRs based on streamlining Cochrane’s gold-standard SR methodology;
4) discuss challenges RRs present, including methodological and logistical issues; and
5) inform participants about ongoing RR initiatives, including possible tools that will enable production of more transparent and timely reviews.
Description:
This session will be a mixture of presentations, and a small group exercise. Specifically, attendees will complete an exercise in which they will be asked to assess and discuss the attributes of a sampling of RRs produced by two different organizations, in order to emphasize the spectrum of possible approaches to RR conduct versus a 'one-size fits all' approach. Potential technical issues related to RRs, as well as report layout and customization, transparency, and involvement of decision-makers in the process, will also be covered in this session. Importantly, this session will emphasize the need to assess appropriateness in undertaking a RR, while underscoring the importance of managing scope through various stages of the RR process. The session will end with a mini-quiz covering the key take-home messages followed by general questions and discussion. We intend to use a cloud-based polling tool that will allow facilitators to engage and interact with participants, using their device of choice, in real-time throughout the session with the aim of fostering discussion and assessing their knowledge of RRs.
Rapid reviews (RRs) are increasingly employed as a research synthesis tool to support timely evidence-informed decision-making. However, the methodology used to develop RRs is still emerging.
Objectives:
This introductory workshop aims to:
1) introduce the concept of RRs as differentiated from traditional systematic reviews (SRs);
2) impart an understanding of the utility of RRs as an evidence synthesis product;
3) give a high-level overview of methodological approaches to RRs based on streamlining Cochrane’s gold-standard SR methodology;
4) discuss challenges RRs present, including methodological and logistical issues; and
5) inform participants about ongoing RR initiatives, including possible tools that will enable production of more transparent and timely reviews.
Description:
This session will be a mixture of presentations, and a small group exercise. Specifically, attendees will complete an exercise in which they will be asked to assess and discuss the attributes of a sampling of RRs produced by two different organizations, in order to emphasize the spectrum of possible approaches to RR conduct versus a 'one-size fits all' approach. Potential technical issues related to RRs, as well as report layout and customization, transparency, and involvement of decision-makers in the process, will also be covered in this session. Importantly, this session will emphasize the need to assess appropriateness in undertaking a RR, while underscoring the importance of managing scope through various stages of the RR process. The session will end with a mini-quiz covering the key take-home messages followed by general questions and discussion. We intend to use a cloud-based polling tool that will allow facilitators to engage and interact with participants, using their device of choice, in real-time throughout the session with the aim of fostering discussion and assessing their knowledge of RRs.