Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
The Global Evidence Summit was the first time that Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, Guidelines International Network, International Society for Evidence-based Health Care, and Joanna Briggs Institute have joined forces to create the best evidence in evidence-based policy.
Objectives:
Analyzing conference papers releases the cooperative relationship between countries and research institutions, as well as the current research hotspots and directions.
Methods:
BICOMS (bibliographic information co-occurrence mining system) is used to organize the key words of conference papers. The social network diagram is drawn by using NetDraw in Ucinet 6 software. Cluster analysis is carried out by gcluto.
Results:
We included 752 conference papers in this analysis, including 199 oral presentations and 553 posters. The main countries contributing orals were Britain (68), Canada (44), the USA (34). Cooperation between Europeans and Americans is close, the main research teams were Mike Maas the University and the Ottawa University in Canada. The main research contents were as follows: evidence production, evidence analysis, evidence practice and decision making (Figure.1). The main countries contributing posters were in Britain (116), the USA (70), China (67); the main research teams were Lanzhou University Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Chinese GRADE center. Research hotspots were the dissemination and transformation of evidence, individual health decision-making in primary health care in low-income countries, evaluation and application of GRADE, traditional Chinese Medicine research, and guidelines for research report quality (Figure.2).
Conclusions:
This summit focuses on the concept of the 'evidence ecosystem'. In term of evidence research, China was in a subordinate position in international cooperation. Thus, improving the evidence analysis, production, transformation and practice, strengthening international cooperation, bringing into play domestic advantage is the only way in the domestic construction and development of ecological evidence.
Patient or healthcare consumer involvement:
The Global Evidence Summit largely contributed to healthcare evidence which makes researchers and healthcare consumers more clearly acquaint the effective track of improving quality of life.
The Global Evidence Summit was the first time that Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, Guidelines International Network, International Society for Evidence-based Health Care, and Joanna Briggs Institute have joined forces to create the best evidence in evidence-based policy.
Objectives:
Analyzing conference papers releases the cooperative relationship between countries and research institutions, as well as the current research hotspots and directions.
Methods:
BICOMS (bibliographic information co-occurrence mining system) is used to organize the key words of conference papers. The social network diagram is drawn by using NetDraw in Ucinet 6 software. Cluster analysis is carried out by gcluto.
Results:
We included 752 conference papers in this analysis, including 199 oral presentations and 553 posters. The main countries contributing orals were Britain (68), Canada (44), the USA (34). Cooperation between Europeans and Americans is close, the main research teams were Mike Maas the University and the Ottawa University in Canada. The main research contents were as follows: evidence production, evidence analysis, evidence practice and decision making (Figure.1). The main countries contributing posters were in Britain (116), the USA (70), China (67); the main research teams were Lanzhou University Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Chinese GRADE center. Research hotspots were the dissemination and transformation of evidence, individual health decision-making in primary health care in low-income countries, evaluation and application of GRADE, traditional Chinese Medicine research, and guidelines for research report quality (Figure.2).
Conclusions:
This summit focuses on the concept of the 'evidence ecosystem'. In term of evidence research, China was in a subordinate position in international cooperation. Thus, improving the evidence analysis, production, transformation and practice, strengthening international cooperation, bringing into play domestic advantage is the only way in the domestic construction and development of ecological evidence.
Patient or healthcare consumer involvement:
The Global Evidence Summit largely contributed to healthcare evidence which makes researchers and healthcare consumers more clearly acquaint the effective track of improving quality of life.