Article type
Year
Abstract
Background:
Many members of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Network have reported facing difficulties when trying to register review titles with Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs). However, this situation has never been studied yet.Objectives:
To describe the prevalence and the pattern of difficulties in registering Cochrane titles, from a sample of Iberoamerican authors. To explore possible solutions to overcome them.Methods:
All the Co-ordinators of the Iberoamerican Branches were surveyed about: proportion and reasons of title rejections; frequency of satisfactory CRG explanations; and proposals to overcome the perceived difficulties.Results:
At the moment 7/16 Co-ordinators of the Iberoamerican Branches have answered the survey. From 51 titles proposedduring the last two years, 29 were finally registered (56.9%). The mean time to register a title is 43.9+-28.9 days (median 30 days). The reasons for rejections were: topic already covered by a title in the process of registering, topic overlaps with an already published Cochrane protocol/review, topic falls out of the scope of the CRG, too narrow spectrum of the population/intervention, topic already undertaken in a non-Cochrane review. Fifty per cent of the respondents received "satisfactory answers" a few times while the other 50% received them many times. Forty per cent of the respondents shared these reasons many times but 60% never did or only a few times. Suggestions to overcome the difficulties were: formalising appeal instances for rejections; presenting transparent information on the websites including the reasons for a rejection and comments of the applicants; avoiding title hijacking (title was registered for three years); presenting solid and detailed arguments for the rejection.