• “Evidence Tori dey”: Contextualising knowledge translation and communication of evidence for Consumers through Storytelling in treatment of malaria in Africa
• A comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary healthcare in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: Summary and recommendations of the Expert Panel
• A systematic review of proposed approaches and exercises conducted for prioritizing topics or questions for systematic reviews
• Advanced meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy: dealing with heterogeneity and test comparisons
• An approach to assessing data richness in primary qualitative studies included in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example
• Appropriate use of prescription opioids: how to do a systematic review of strategies
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence
• Effect of evidence-based medicine courses on informatics competencies of medical college students
• Improving medical content accessed by millions: Wikipedia and the WikiJournal of Medicine
• International Comparison of the Job Satisfaction of Nurses and Gross Domestic Product (GDP): A Systematic Review
• Issues in interpreting and presenting patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane reviews
• Issues in using, interpreting, and presenting patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Issues in using, interpreting, and presenting patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prevalence research: adapting the Hoy criteria
• Living Evidence to Inform Health Decisions Framework (LE-IHD): A practical interactive framework based tool to guide the incorporation of Living Evidence in the development of knowledge transfer products
• Methodologies for critical appraisal of prevalence studies: a systematic review
• Overcoming the difficulties of meta-analysis in psychotherapy
• Scoping reviews versus systematic reviews: results from a scoping review of scoping reviews
• US-PCG consumer involvement and outreach efforts
• : Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to report the conclusions in a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
• :[P04-33] A collaboration-wide survey of Cochrane authors
• 'A complete shift in ownership': valuing contributions from consumers and other stakeholders in systematic reviews
• 'Clustering' documents automatically to support scoping reviews of research
• 'Cochrane Lehrmodule': development and implementation of teaching modules in university-affiliated courses
• 'Consumers for the terrified' or identifying good practice in involving consumers in the work of Cochrane Review Groups
• 'Destaques Cochrane’: an initiative for making Cochrane Reviews more popular among students and health professionals in Brazil
• 'Fatal flaws' in randomised controlled trials of interventions for low-back pain
• 'Health in your language' by the Evidence-Based Medicine Unit to provide the best healthcare evidence for the community of Portuguese-speaking countries
• 'Hit, Miss or Maybe". An Analysis of the Usefulness ofCochrane Reviews to Commissioners of Health Care in one Health Region in the UK.
• 'Irrelevant’ or 'neglected’? An analysis of RCTs in the ARI Group
• 'Leaving no-one behind': applying an equity lens to Cochrane Eyes and Vision reviews on cataract
• 'Listen to my heart': qualitative researchers and people living with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) collaborate to provide guidance for future RHD research
• 'Other bias' in the 'Risk of bias' tool for Cochrane Reviews: a systematic analysis
• 'Portuguese Pills' by WhatsApp: a typically Brazilian experience
• 'Rapid review' methodology to inform a policy decision: when is it fit for purpose? A case study
• 'Real-real world evidence' to understand the use of health information systems for decision making
• 'Risk of bias' assessments for random sequence generation and blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane Systematic Reviews were frequently inadequate
• 'Screen For Me': harnessing the efficiencies of machine learning and Cochrane Crowd to identify randomized trials for Cochrane Reviews
• 'Sometimes similar, sometimes different': a systematic review of meta-analyses of random and nonrandomized policy intervention studies
• 'Spring-cleaning' of Cochrane reviews and clinical guidelines in order to co-ordinate Cochrane reviews and clinical practice
• 'To fast or not to fast': Cochrane Nutrition and the Cochrane Fast-track Service join hands to produce a priority nutrition review for WHO
• ‘Buying’ into Cochrane: how do Fields measure success?
• ‘Discussion sections’: are we ignoring valuable insights into intervention effectiveness?
• ‘Dr. Cochrane’: an innovative approach to continuing medical education using Cochrane reviews
• ‘Extreme reviewing’: use of text-mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews
• ‘Mindlines’ or ‘Bricolage’ - An ethnographic study of the social organisation of practice nurses' knowledge use
• ‘No more updates’: a descriptive study of the 126 ‘stable’ Cochrane reviews in March 2012
• ‘Teenevidence’: Evidence for Young People for Our Topics and Our Style
• ‘The Order of Cochrane’ - a new way to encourage students to learn about systematic reviews and Cochrane
• ‘Think Pink’ Bahrain and The Cochrane Collaboration: raising awareness among breast cancer survivors and clinicians to the evidence base for decision making
• "Admissible Evidence": the nature of evidence in Public Health and Medicine
• "Admissible Evidence": the nature of evidence in Public Health and Medicine
• "Growing Pains": A Critical Review of the Literature
• "Guidelines meet shared decision making. Happy ever after?"
• "The Cochrane Library is a peer-reviewed publication" – what does this mean in practice?
• "Weight of evidence" as an expression of clinical heterogeneity
• “Info without side effects” – Development and application of a checklist for lay users for evaluating online health information
• “It’s Not Smooth Sailing”: Bridging the Gap Between Methods and Content Expertise in Public Health Guideline Development
• @EvidenceAid: exploring the social network of a humanitarian knowledge translation programme
• 1948 and all that. How far back should we look for RCTs and CCTs?
• 20 ways to move Cochrane evidence into practice: a celebration of 20 years of disseminating Cochrane’s research to the world—and how you can use what we’ve done!
• 40 Years of randomised trials in the New Zealand Medical Journal
• 50 Years of randomised controlled trials relevant to the care of schizophrenia: 2000 studies, 18 outcomes, 670 rating scales
• 50 Years of reporting of randomised controlled trials in general health care journals worldwide: how things have changed
• A 40-hour tailored training programme improves evidence-based practice (EBP) competences in clinical nurses
• A Bayesian approach facilitates interpretation of results in meta-analysis: the example of periodontal disease
• A Bayesian approach to detect outliers in Network Meta-analysis
• A Bayesian selection model for incorporating prior information for publication bias in meta-analysis
• A best-practice implementation project of the maintenance of totally implantable ports: Lessons from one high-volume centre
• A better gold pan: capturing RCTs with more precision
• A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Based on SEER Database Research
• A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Knowledge Structure of Frailty
• A bibliometric analysis of Cochrane collaboration and its products
• A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited Cochrane reviews
• A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science published literature on adverse drug effects
• A bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: accuracy of maternal serum human choriongonadotrophin (MShCG) determination in the prediction of pre-eclampsia
• A blog series by Students 4 Best Evidence: to explain and promote 36 ‘key concepts’ essential for assessing treatment claims
• A call to heighten quality of education in developing systematic reviews concerning traditional Chinese medi­cines in China
• A call to support Cochrane's social responsibility of improving health equity - the Equity Group
• A Canadian example of facilitating the uptake of syntheses into public health practice
• A case report on updating Cochrane Reviews
• A case study of diminishing returns: updating a hypothesis-generating systematic review with 'negative' findings
• A case study of involving members of a parent advisory group in developing the search strategy for a systematic review
• A case study on the reporting of effect size estimates in breast cancer trials
• A catalogue of biases described in the literature, and their implications for ROBINS-I
• A Central Cochrane Contacts Database - That Works
• A central repository for data extracted in systematic reviews
• A challenge to accepted wisdom: systematic review of 35 Years of cholera vaccine trials
• A challenging mixed literature review experience
• A checklist approach to evaluation of scientific study protocols approval removes bottleneck and improves methodological quality: a randomized controlled trial
• A checklist for the assessment of published indirect comparisons and network meta-analyses
• A citation analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews in Chinese Science Citation Database
• A cloud computing database for data extraction in a Cochrane Review
• A cloud computing database for data extraction in a Cochrane Review
• A cluster randomised-controlled trial for alcohol-use disorders in HIV care clinics
• A co-produced e-toolkit to support patient and public involvement in developing and promoting core outcome sets
• A Cochrane Collaboration systematic review of melanoma incidence in randomized controlled trials of lipid-lowering agents
• A Cochrane registry has multiple functions
• A Cochrane Systematic Review of Stabilisation Splint Therapy for Temporomandibular Pain Dysfunction Syndrome
• A Cochrane-driven scientific initiation
• A coherent framework for choosing 'fit for purpose’ review methods
• A combined database for meta-epidemiological research: characteristics of included trials
• A common descriptive dataset for shared evaluation (systematic review) of interventions to implement clinical practice guidelines
• A Community of Practice implementing evidence
• A comparative analysis of systematic reviews published in Chinese academic journals and the Cochrane Library
• A comparative study of publication bias in systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine and conventional medicine
• A comparison of checked versus unchecked individual patient data (IPD)
• A Comparison of Cochrane Reviews with Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Journals
• A comparison of different approaches for editing health-related information: An editor's satisfaction perspective
• A comparison of different forward citation chasing tools for complementary searches for Cochrane systematic reviews
• A comparison of duplicate detection automation tools: a head-to-head comparison study
• A comparison of effect estimates from meta-analysis of published data and effect estimates from pooled patient data
• A comparison of Embase randomised controlled trial filters
• A comparison of Embase systematic review filters
• A comparison of handsearching versus Chinese BioMedical (CBM) database searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials
• A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials.
• A comparison of long and short quality scores of published trials
• A comparison of MEDLINE, EMBASE AND CINAHL on searches for systematic reviews in respiratory health
• A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes
• A comparison of statistical methods for identifying out-ofdate systematic reviews
• A comparison of subgroup analyses in grant applications and publications
• A comparison of the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for meta-analysis with conventional frequentist methods: a systematic review of simulation and empirical studies
• A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR
• A comparison of two search filters for economic evaluations. The CADTH Narrow vs the NHS EED search filter
• A comparison of two search methods for determining the scope of systematic reviews
• A comprehensive approach to assess the existing evidence and appropriateness of anticancer drugs on advanced cancer: the ASTAC project
• A comprehensive handsearch of controlled clinical trials published in otolaryngology journals in Spanish
• A comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary healthcare in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: Neonatal health findings
• A conceptual framework of evidence synthesis for using real-world data to improve childhood cancer health outcomes and resource use in Egypt
• A consumer-led project on evidence-based healthcare information for consumers
• A core outcome set for asthma management: Consensus work across NICE Guidelines, Cochrane Airways Group and the COMET Initiative
• A cost benefit analysis using beta-blockers as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure
• A creative way for knowledge translation: Using a short comedy play in local language to disseminate healthcare evidence to 'illiterate and semi-illiterate' villagers
• A crib sheet for Cochrane Review authors’ use of trial registries
• A critical appraisal of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - a cardiovascular perspective
• A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
• A critical historical review shows mismatch between available evidence and related international guidelines recommendations: the case of advanced oesophageal cancer
• A critical review to nutrition clinical practice guideline
• A critique and guide of methods to assess interactions in individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis
• A cross-sectional analysis of the use of data visualisation in scoping reviews and evidence maps
• A database of Informatics Evaluation in Primary Care
• A database of systematic reviews in eyes and vision – a cross-section of the evidence available to underpin clinical practice guidelines and set the research agenda
• A database to record the impact of fraud and misconduct in studies included in systematic reviews
• A demonstration and guide to SCHARP, a software application for the analysis and plotting of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis
• A Description of the high quality evidences for health policy research in China: evidence-based health policy research
• A descriptive analysis of funding in research articles published in Revista médica de Chile between 2017-2021.
• A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014
• A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2010
• A descriptive analysis of pediatric trials published in 2007
• A descriptive analysis of risk of bias in neonatal trials and the association with effect estimates
• A dialog with funders: What approaches and activities ensure research achieves its expected impact?
• A digital map of systematic reviews on non-pharmacological interventions to inform policy making in infectious disease control
• A discussion of the challenges in conducting a systematic review of adverse effects including randomized trials and non-randomized studies
• A domain independent structured trial register
• A family of different dissemination products from one Cochrane Review
• A fast-track method of adapting clinical practice guidelines at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
• A flexible online tool for the management of complex evidence-synthesis projects
• A forward search algorithm for detection of extreme study effects in network meta-analysis
• A Framework for Choosing Between Multiple Interventions in Guidelines
• A framework for deciding if individual participant data are likely to be worthwhile
• A framework for determining the applicability and practical feasibility of a systematic review: experience from the area of risk assessment for food and feed safety
• A framework for developing and implementing clinical prediction models across multiple studies
• A framework for evaluating and distinguishing validity and generalization of prediction models
• A framework for individual participant data meta-analysis in the presence of missing data
• A framework for meta-analysis of prediction models for binary and time-to-event outcomes
• A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
• A framework to identifying and characterise research gaps from systematic reviews
• A framework to interpret external validition studies of prediction models
• A framework to promote evidence use
• A fully automated pipeline for a living review of methods to (semi)automate data extraction
• A general framework for exploring the impact of suboptimal treatment choices to health outcomes in a real-world population
• A generalized latent variable modelling framework for the bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic reviews
• A good method to promote evidence-based medicine into clinical practice in Taiwan? A clinical pharmacist’s perception
• A GP evidence-based peer training program: the EPIDAS-Pneumo study
• A graphical display of reporting factors associated with systematic reviews: an example from diabetic retinopathy
• A graphical meta-analysis module for facilitating transparent healthcare decision-making
• A guide to prospective meta-analysis
• A half day interactive workshop in systematic review and the Cochrane Collaboration: a University of Toronto site group initiative
• A hands-on introduction to NMAstudio: a web-application to produce and visualize network meta-analyses
• A health service approach to dissemination, knowledge translation and research impact
• A health technology assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)—evaluation the methods of effectiveness and safety
• A hierarchical framework of methods for systematic searching
• A huge challenge: traditional Chinese medicine vs Cochrane systematic review
• A hybrid approach for automating citation screening process
• A hybrid effects model for bias-risk adjusting meta-analysis
• A large-scale comparison between the global conduct of randomised-controlled trials and the global burden of diseases
• A latest survey on national training workshop on Cochrane systematic review in China
• A linked evidence synthesis evaluating mental health interventions for children with long-term conditions: Communicating implications for policy and practice
• A linked-evidence synthesis evaluating interventions aiming to improve the mental health of children with long-term conditions: Reflections on stakeholder consultation
• A living network meta-analysis of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: Novelty at the frontier of living evidence
• A Living Systematic Review to Support Health Technology Assessment: The CADTH Experience
• A look inside the black box: a description of the editorial process at three leading biomedical journals
• A machine learning approach to classifying articles for literature reviews based on titles and abstracts
• A map of maps: evidence for the sustainable development goals
• A map of outcomes in trials of communication interventions for childhood vaccination: measuring too few concepts in too many ways
• A measurement properties systematic review of instruments for assessing undergraduate nursing students’ evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, and skills
• A Meta-analysis (MA) of the Effect of World-Wide Psychosocial HIV Interventions on the Sex Behaviors of Persons Who Use Drugs
• A meta-analysis of colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood
• A meta-analysis of individual patient data with repeated outcome measures: treatment of type 1 diabetic microalbuminuric patients with ACE inhibitors.
• A meta-analysis of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with calcitonin