• What is the experience of family carers of patient with dementia living in community of South Korea?
• What is the influence of randomization sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study
• What is the level of expertise of ChatGPT in the domain of systematic reviews and meta-analysis?
• What is the methodological quality and transparency of depression clinical practice guidelines?
• What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesismethod to conduct a review? A scoping review
• What is the most efficient de-duplication software for use in systematic reviews?
• What is the nature and magnitude of inappropriate healthcare services in Canada? A Systematic Review
• What is the probability of discovering breakthrough interventions in industry versus publicly sponsored randomized controlled trials
• What is the probability that higher vs lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?
• What is the probability that results of meta-analyses will favor innovative treatments?
• What is the role of public trials registers in Cochrane Systematic Reviews?
• What is the role of scientific evidence in decisions to adopt complex innovations? A multiple case study in cancer care
• What is the study design?
• What is the test’s accuracy in my practice population Tailored meta-analysis provides a plausible estimate
• What is valuable research?
  
• What kind of evidence can be found in incident reporting systems? Systematic evaluation of incident reports to identify risks using syringe pumps
• What kinds of evidence does civil-society bring to decision-making and how are these used? A case-study of vaccine-decisions in Ghana.
• What measures of accuracy should we present in DTA reviews?
• What modifications are made in studies reviewed by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medical device approval?
• What next for Cochrane in systematic reviews of prognosis?
• What obstacles do general practitioners face in implementing guidelines for the management of depression?
• What place do consumers and an international network structure have within The Cochrane Collaboration? A formal review
• What published methodological guides exist on how to conduct the most common types of evidence syntheses? – A scoping review
• What systematic reviews gain when they include qualitative research: a systematic review of qualitative work on workplace-based return to work practices
• What to do if the results of conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis are contradictory? An example from a systematic review on the effects of antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia
• What to do with non 2x2 data from a diagnostic systematic review? An example from a review on identifying the seizure focus in patients with epilepsy
• What to edit and when in Cochrane reviews. Where to start and when to stop!
• What useful information does a search summary table provide: a case study from a mixed methods systematic review
• What we do in the shadows: Interviews with methodologists on synthesis methods when meta-analysis is not possible for all studies
• What we don't know about evidence and medical practice: Issues raised by Project ImpACT and lessons from the impact literature
• What we know we don’t know: identifying thera­peutic uncertainties from systematic reviews
• What we’re learning about evidence-informed policymaking: Researchers’ perspectives on advocating for evidence in Africa
• What will the first impact factor of The Cochrane Library tell us
• What will the second impact factor tell us about The Cochrane Library and its systematic reviews?
• What Works Centres – collaboration across health, social care, educational achievement, crime, early intervention, economic growth, ageing better and wellbeing
• What Works Climate? Systematic learning on climate solutions for improved IPCC assessments and evidence-based policy
• What works in preventing radicalization, hate crime, and violent extremism: The Campbell Collaboration countering violent extremism (CVE) evidence synthesis programme
• What works in supporting inclusive development research?
• What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision-making: discussing insights from an evidence map and systematic review
• What works, for whom and when: the rational for and outcomes from a realist review of advocacy for women experiencing partner abuse
• What's unique about conducting research with adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: Introducing a new methodological series
• What’s in ‘Dr Cochrane’ for family physicians? Evaluation of an online Cochrane Learning programme with the Information Assessment Method (IAM)
• What’s in it and how do users find it?—challenges of knowledge transfer through specialised registers of health promotion effectiveness
• What’s more important - timeliness or accuracy of results in providing evidence? Preliminary results on a research program on rapid reviews
• What’s the point of evaluating effectiveness? Perspectives from a low income setting
• What’s the problem in involving consumers in Cochrane review groups: the experiences of the consumer representative on the Monitoring and Registration Group
• What’s the story?: publicity, global media coverage and author experience
• What(ch) evidence! Drawing on the actor-network theory for an exploration of the dynamic struggle of the Cochrane Collaboration to build bridges between research results and clinical practice
• When an overview of systematic reviews is not enough—challenges in synthesizing evidence from both reviews and primary studies
• When and how to update systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
• When can research conducted elsewhere be useful here? Perceptions of local applicability and transferability
• When can we trust ‘early’ statistically significant treatment effect estimates in cumulative cardiology meta-analyses? – a simulation study
• When clinical practice does not follow the evidence: physician's recommendation of mammography
• When clinical practice does not follow the evidence: physician's recommendation of mammography
• When do indirect and mixed treatment comparisons result in invalid findings? A graphical explanation
• When engaging with stakeholders is tricky: effective and ethical stakeholder engagement in reviews on sensitive, challenging or controversial topics
• When it rains: synthesizing umbrella reviews of educational interventions
• When lack of evidence informs policy and the public debate: experiences from a systematic review on shared physical custody
• When methodologies conflict: developing tools to compare and select appropriate methodologies for conducting, and appraising evidence from systematic reviews
• When rating gets tough - coping with difficult situations when using the new risk of bias assessment tool
• When should an effective treatment be recommended for use? Quantitative derivation of the threshold NNT
• When should potentially false research findings be tolerated?
• When should systematic reviews be replicated, and when is it wasteful?
• When should systematic reviews be replicated, and when is it wasteful? An analysis of reasons for discordance among overlapping systematic reviews
• When should systematic reviews of effects restrict studies to those conducted in low- and middle-income countries: A proposal?
• When the evidence is lacking, ways to proceed when the main result of systematic reviews are- more research needed.
  
• When there is no evidence - an RCT for treatment of otitis media with asymptomatic effusion (OME) in Aboriginal infants
• When to call upon a working group of experts to produce recommendations using an Accelerated Developed Guidelines (ADG) method?
• When treatments can be combined: example of infection prophylaxis in cancer patients
• When you conduct a systematic review about drug safety, you will run into these issues
• When, why and how to conduct a Cochrane overview of reviews
• When, why, and how to conduct a Cochrane overview of reviews
• Where and how to find data on safety: What do systematic reviews of complementary therapies tell us?
• Where do completed trials come from?
• Where do systematic reviews in health policy and systems research search for studies?
• Where do we stand with involving knowledge users in rapid reviews? – a cross-sectional study
  
• Where does economics fit in? A review of economics in Cochrane Reviews
• Where to identify information on adverse effects for a systematic review: a methodological overview
• Where to look for studies to include in EPOC reviews
• Whether prospective registration can improve the overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a comparative meta-epidemiological study
• Which coding system for therapeutic information
• Which Electronic Resources Should be Searched to Identify RCTs for Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Overview of the Literature
• Which information sources should be used to identify studies for systematic reviews of economic evaluations?
• Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD)?
• Which journals have cited Cochrane Systematic Reviews?
• Which knowledge synthesis method can be used to answer research questions of complex evidence?
• Which literature retrieval method is most effective? Teaching the Index Medicus/Medline in post-graduate courses for family physicians
• Which meta-analysis model best fits my diagnostic test data? Use of model fit statistics
• Which Review Group does this title belong to?
• Which summary measure of treatment effectiveness in meta-analysis is the most externally applicable, odds ratio, risk ratio or risk difference?
• WHO Abortion Care Guideline: systematic integration of a competency framework for the health worker recommendations
• Who do Cochrane Reviewers Believe They are Writing for?
• WHO environmental and occupational health guidelines: 8 challenges
• WHO Essential Medicines List and WHO Guidelines: Recommendation Mapping and Discordance Analysis
  
• WHO Essential Medicines List as a priority setting method based on country needs to orient (rapid) Cochrane evidence syntheses
• Who is listening? A qualitative study of Cochrane podcast users
• Who is responsible for considering how contextual factors affect healthcare interventions: reviewers, end users of reviews or both?
• Who is responsible for developing patient guidelines?
• Who is using The Cochrane Library? Usage statistics of Wiley InterScience
• WHO recommendations on admission, referral, transfer, and exit criteria for severe wasting and nutritional edema informed by prognostic evidence synthesis
• Who should benefit from screening? Are we using the right denominator?
• Who uses The Cochrane Library? Data from two online surveys of users of The Cochrane Library on the Wiley InterScience platform
• Who wants to be a meta-analyst: The Second Annual Game Show Edition
• Who wants to be a meta-analyst?
• WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: applying a complexity perspective in guideline development
• WHO-ISH (World Health Organisation and International Society of Hypertension) Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration: a register of trials for the conduct of overviews
• Who, why, what, where & when – questions about usage of The Cochrane Library
• Who’s afraid of…. AI? How to harness the benefits of Large Language Models for evidence synthesis and mitigate the risks
  
• Whose knowledge counts: Using the PowerCube to explore visible, hidden and invisible power affecting the production and use of evidence
  
• Why 196 Cochrane Systematic Reviews were withdrawn in Cochrane Database of systematic review?
• Why a Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Sub-Field?
• Why an overhaul of randomized controlled trials concerning women’s health is in demand. A checklist to assess the integrity of research
• Why and when children are different: Guidance on appropriate inclusion of child health data in systematic reviews
• Why are most Cochrane perinatal reviews inconclusive and what needs to be done?
• Why conducting one if you can conduct 82 (living) reviews?
• Why did the patient have the test? Considering the clinical pathway and intended role of a test on diagnostic accuracy
• Why disguise adverse events?
• Why do Cochrane Reviews have fewer citations than systematic reviews from journals with high impact factors?
• Why do diagnostic tests differ in performance between different settings?
• Why do healthcare professionals use eTG complete instead of clinical practice guidelines when making prescribing decisions?
• Why do Systematic Reviewers Choose Paper over Electronic (Cochrane) Publication?
• Why don’t GPs follow guidelines? Increasing our understanding of complex interventions by combining qualitative and quantitative reviews
• Why should we translate Cochrane Reviews into French?
• Why so many 'RCTs' were false? A further investiga­tion about ethics review status of the 'RCTs' published in Chinese journals
• Why systematic review production and update processes are resource intensive: a phenomenological qualitative study protocol
• Why we need a new Cochrane Thematic Group on Person-centred care, Health Systems and Public Health
• Why were they missed? Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through the MEDLINE Retagging Project but not the US National Library of Medicine (NLM)
• Wikipedia and crowd sourcing: Improving health information for the public
• Wikipedia meets Cochrane: working to get better evidence into mass use
• Wikipedia: An important dissemination tool for Cochrane
• WikiRecs and BMJ RapidRecs: rapid and trustworthy recommendations that provide ingredients and tools for shared decision making
• WikiRecs: rapid creation and dissemination of evidence summaries and trustworthy recommendations to point of care
• Wikis and collaborative writing applications in healthcare: results of a scoping review
• Will notification that the journal does not require authors to pay to publish encourage them to submit to a subscription-based journal? A randomized study
• Will the Epistemonikos Trials Database avoid the need of searching in multiple databases?
• Will web search engines replace bibliographic databases? Review
• Will you fund my idea? A retrospective look at public nominations to the AHRQ EPC Program.
• Willingness of Korean medicine doctors to participate and their potential influence in alleviating the high suicide rate in South Korea
• Willingness to share individual participant data, and barriers and facilitators to data sharing: a retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional survey
• Withdrawals of Cochrane systematic reviews: a description of reasons
• Women's experiences of termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly: A qualitative systematic review
• Women’s preferences for surgical treatments of urinary incontinence: a discrete choice experiment
• Word frequency analysis of over a million words to support the development of search strategies on 'health-related values'
• Wording GRADEd evidence statements and recommendations
• Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain (Cochrane Review)
• Workforce training in evidence-informed decision making
• Working in partnership with people in the developing world
• Working in partnership with stakeholders to update a priority Cochrane Review: implementation and evaluation
• Working in partnership with the WHO to provide timely evidence on causes of maternal death
• Working together to prioritise and synthesise evidence about promising alternative models of healthcare delivery for a more sustainable health system
• Working with diverse evidence in Cochrane Reviews: methods and tools to support integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence
• Working with knowledge users to improve evidence-based medicine prescribing and use: key informant interviews and the process of developing an international training collaboration
• Working with policy makers to maximise the utility of EGMs: experiences of Exeter Policy and Research Programme Evidence Review Facility
• Working with stakeholders to identify evidence gaps: an example from autism
• Working with the GRADEprofiler (GRADEpro)
• Workings of the Australian Satellite of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group
• Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work
• Works works with communities (for whom and in what context): the Innovation Zones at Queen's University Belfast
  
• Workshop for Cochrane Trials Search Co-ordinators (advanced)
• Workshop for Cochrane Trials Search Co-ordinators (intermediate)
• Workshop for journalists as a communication tool to disseminate Evidence-Based Health to the general public
• Workshop for Managing Editors and Assistant Managing Editors
• Workshop for Managing Editors and Assistant Managing Editors
• Workshop for Managing Editors and Assistant Managing Editors
• Workshop for Managing Editors and Assistant Managing Editors
• Workshop for Managing Editors and Assistant Managing Editors (restricted)
• Workshops on evidence-based medicine for health professionals who support judicial decisions related to healthcare in Brazil
  
• World Health Organization mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: A review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries
• Would a timely analysis of secondary outcomes have led to an earlier identification of effective stroke rehabilitation interventions?
• Would evidence make a difference in people’s willingness to pay for and actual use of anti-hypertensive medication?
• Writing a Cochrane Review update: getting started and challenges to overcome
• Writing abstracts for Cochrane systematic reviews using newly-published guidance
• Writing and commenting on Plain Language Summaries (PLSs) to improve quality
• Writing Complex Search Strategies ***PARTICIPANTS: Please bring your laptops to this session
• Writing evidence summaries for the general public: lessons learned from collaboration with Patient Partners
• You can learn a lot from a DUMMY: Improving search strategies using the ‘diagnostic-based utility for mining MEDLINE’ (DUMMY)
• You can't save lives unless there are people dying: implications of heterogeneity of control rates in clinical trials and meta-analyses
• Young neurologists interested in Cochrane reviews need more basic knowledge in statistics and epidemiology
• Your gateway to Chinese research
• Youth evidence-based medicine camp: improving logic thinking for high school students
• Zinc Supplementation for Acute and Persistent Watery Diarrhea in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis