• Using science, technology, innovation and partnerships to accelerate development outcomes: Identifying priorities for new evidence generation and synthesis
• Using search narratives to explain literature search strategies: a worked example
• Using simple microsimulation to estimate risk difference from a meta-analysis
• Using social media and crowdsourcing to gather important publications for a scoping review about wikis and collaborative writing tools
• Using social media as evidence in an Evidence Gap Map on Topical Steroid Withdrawal Syndrome: Challenges and considerations
  
• Using social media for effective communication
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media platforms to disseminate Cochrane evidence in China
• Using social media to disseminate translated Cochrane evidence and to promote high-quality health information in non-English speaking regions
• Using SWIFT-Active Screener to reduce the expense of evidence-based toxicology
• Using SWIFT-Active Screener to reduce the expense of evidence-based toxicology
• Using systematic review methods to assess the evidence on performance of measurement instruments in wound care
• Using systematic reviews and prescribing data to analyse off-label drugs use: the case of antiemetics for gastroenteritis in children
• Using systematic reviews to derive science-based products for HIV prevention
• Using systematic reviews to formulate research recommendations
• Using systematic reviews to identify the essential components of interventions: the example of parenting
• Using systematic reviews to inform evidence on acceptability, feasibility, and equity in Evidence to Decision frameworks
  
• Using systematic reviews to make decisions about research: moving beyond health science
• Using systematic reviews to study adverse drug reactions: The example of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
• Using systematically synthesised evidence to inform the funding of new clinical trials - the UK Medical Research Council approach
• Using technology to make the Evidence Ecosystem more efficient and effective: global collaborations for interoperability
• Using text mining technologies can reduce screening workload in systematic reviews in practice as well as in theory
• Using text mining to facilitate policy relevant systematic reviews
• Using text-mining to develop a U.S.-specific geographic search filter to facilitate systematic reviews in Ovid MEDLINE
• Using the adjusted indirect comparison in a Health Technology Assessment (HTA): clopidogrel versus modified-release dipyridamole
• Using the AMSTAR checklist for network meta-analysis: does it fit?
• Using the AMSTAR checklist for rapid reviews – does it fit?
• Using the capture-recapture technique in systematic literature searches
• Using the Cochrane community site to support Cochrane work
• Using the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CENTRAL) to Identify Clinical Trials in Selected Medical Fields
• Using the Cochrane RCT 'Risk of bias' tool in systematic reviews
• Using the Cochrane Register of Studies to identify the evidence gaps in Cochrane systematic reviews
• Using the Cochrane Register of Studies to studify your Specialised Register
• Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool in systematic reviews
• Using the consultation and scoping process to inform the ‘Implications for research’ section: an example from a suite of Cochrane Reviews on chronic suppurative otitis media
• Using the Delphi method to construct a system for grading the quality of evidence for public health decision-making
• Using the findings of 'views' studies to explore the findings of effectiveness studies in systematic reviews
• Using the Global Burden of Disease database to inform priority setting
• Using the Global Burden of Disease database to inform priority setting decisions
• Using the GRADE approach to develop guidelines in low income countries: views of guideline panelists in Kenya
• Using the GRADE approach to network meta-analysis
• Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to report the conclusions in a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
• Using the Medical Research Council framework for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of complex interventions to identify and develop strategies to promote effective professional practice
• Using the new Cochrane Style Guide
• Using the new online GRADEpro to create 'Summary of findings' tables
• Using the new online GRADEpro to create summary of findings tables ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Using the new online software, GDT, to create 'Summary of findings' tables
• Using the online GRADEpro to create 'Summary of findings' tables
• Using the online GRADEpro to create 'Summary of findings' tables (in Spanish)
• Using the online GRADEpro to create 'Summary of findings’ tables and patient-friendly tools
• Using the results of a qualitative systematic review for quantitative instrument validation
• Using the results of systematic reviews, overviews of systematic reviews, and network meta-analyses to inform clinical practice guideline recommendations
• Using the RobotAnalyst text-mining application to boost efficiency of literature screening: experience from a systematic review in health services research
• Using the smallest worthwhile difference to interpret clinical evidence
  
• Using the TRANSFER framework for assessing transferability of review findings – a case study
• Using the Vote Cards to Encourage Active Participation and to Improve Critical Appraisal Skills in Evidence-Based Medicine Journal Clubs
• Using theory of change to assess impact of knowledge translation initiatives
• Using Theory of Change to Assess Impact of Knowledge Translation Initiatives
• Using theory to guide synthesis of qualitative research: why, how and what would this mean for me?
• Using theory to inform evidence synthesis : a case study of school accountability systematic review in developing countries
• Using workflow reports in Archie to evaluate and improve Cochrane Review Group editorial processes
• Using workflows in Archie
• Utilising Cochrane reviews in clinical guideline development
• Utility of machine learning to identify research for updating a systematic map of evaluations of public health interventions within community pharmacies
• Utilization analysis of Chinese abstract of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in three university hospitals
• Utilization of artificial intelligence in emerging infectious diseases: a scoping review
• Utilization of global policy and evidence in a lower-middle-income country: Omnibus Health Guidelines development
• Utilization of LILACS in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Released in 2023
• Utilization of online database for medical information: a nationwide survey of physicians at regional hospitals in Taiwan
• Utilization of trial registry records and randomized controlled trial study protocols in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a content analysis
• Utilization, impact and barriers to use the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: survey on Chilean post graduate medical students
• Utilizing a logic model framework to evaluate patient navigation interventions on colorectal cancer screening time to diagnostic follow-up care: a study protocol
• Utilizing an Academic Practice Partnership to Support the Nursing Strategic Plan for Recruiting Nurse Graduates to Adult Medical-Surgical Units
  
• Utilizing evidence of Cochrane in decision making by policy makers: Gaps needs to be filled
• Vaccine efficacy/effectiveness: Calculation, visualization, and interpretation based on an exemplary systematic review on COVID-19 vaccination in children
• Validate the clinical practice guideline of acupuncture-related treatments for mitigating functional constipation
• Validating Cochrane Neonatal’s standard search databases: Is it okay to stop searching Embase?
• Validating prognosis search filters using relative recall based on prognosis systematic reviews
• Validation and application of a systematic review and narrative synthesis within mental health services research
• Validation of a consumer-facing Australian Living Guideline for the Pharmacological Management of Inflammatory Arthritis
• Validation of a PubMed search filter for identifying studies including children
• Validation of a quality assessment checklist for case series studies
• Validation of a questionnaire to measure people’s ability to assess claims about treatment effects in Spanish
• Validation of five search filters for retrieving clinical guidelines showed low precision
• Validation of the EBP process assessment scale (EBPPAS): a scale to measure practitioners views about evidence-based practice
• Validation of the Spanish version of the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool
• Validity of Health Technology Assessements(HTA)
• Validity of patient-reported data collected through mobile application in a first paediatric at-home study
• Value of infographics in communicating Cochrane plain language summaries
• Values and preferences for colorectal cancer diagnosis outcomes: a systematic review
• Values and preferences in asthma patients for health care decision making: a systematic literature review.
• Values and preferences in national and international COVID-19 public health guidelines: a systematic review
• Values-based health care: A content analysis study of Culture, Communication, Capacity and Collaboration in published implementation reports.
  
• Variability and completeness of outcome reporting in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane Reviews
• Variability of outcome measures among trials of topical Chinese herbal medicines for musculoskeletal injuries
• Variability of relative treatment effect among populations with low, moderate and high baseline risk: A meta-epidemiological study
  
• Variation among experienced reviewers in the interpretation of the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
• Variation in defining and reporting chronic postsurgical pain following breast cancer surgery: a systematic survey of 188 observational studies
• Variation in definition and measurement of primary outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews of pharmacological treatment of stable COPD
• Variation in outcome measure usage across Cochrane Systematic Reviews related to three common eye conditions
• VARIATION OF WORK PARTICIPATION OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENT METHODS IN TRIALS
• Variations between trials of the effect of chemotherapy: an exploratory analysis of the meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck carcinoma data
• Variations in approaches to mixed methods review: a case study
• Verification of conflicts of interest disclosures in health research: a conceptual analysis
• Verification of the accuracy and completeness of disclosures of Conflict of Interest in the medical literature: a systematic survey
• Video Plain Language Summaries for public involvement in evidence synthesis: improving knowledge dissemination
  
• Videos to improve Portuguese translations of Cochrane abstracts and Plain language summaries: preliminary results of the Brazilian Quality Project
• Views towards publishing protocols for systematic reviews as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey of authors of non-Cochrane systematic reviews
• Village doctors’ preparedness for future pandemics: evidence from a survey in Gansu province, China
  
• Vinca alkaloid containing regimen for advanced breast cancer
• VIP (Very Integrated Program) Project on alcohol and drug abusers in Southern Sweden - RCT of efficacy of the adding the health promotion and rehabilitation for treatment of alcohol and drug abusers
• Virtual reality environments (VRE) for pre-and post- registration health professional education
• Virtual versus in-person format for guideline panel meetings: a qualitative study
• Virtual wards for people with frailty: a rapid realist review and its impact on UK policy and practice
  
• Vision 2020, The right to sight
• Visitor-determined website improvement: combining survey and log results on Cochrane.org
• Visual summaries to increase accessibility and understanding of Cochrane Review evidence
• Visual-storytelling tools for evidence translation and use
• Visualisation study on research in the field of public health published in the Cochrane Library
• Visualising systematic review search strategies to assist information specialists
• Visualization analysis of the research front and hot domains of based-evidence research in the Global Evidence Summit
• Visualization of evidence based medicine development
• Vitamin A given to children with measles - Does dose make a difference?
• Vitamin D analogues in the prevention of axial and appendicular fractures: report of a meta-analysis
• Voices of Cochrane authors: a review of Cochrane podcasts from 2014 to 2018
• Volatile anesthetics versus total intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: An updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
• Volunteer initiative in war-torn Syria to translate Cochrane Blogshots
• Waiting list may be a ‘nocebo’ condition in psychotherapy trials
• Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre: a bespoke evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making
• Warnings for serious adverse events in drug labelling: Are same-class drugs treated the same?
• Waste in research? Exploring overlaps in systematic reviews on exercise for depression in children and adolescents
• Ways to ensure evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are of high quality
• Web searching for systematic reviews: how to develop the current guidance on methods and reporting standards
• Web-based training packages to enhance evidence-informed policy-making for health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
• Web-based virtual collaborative workspace to support development of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines
• WeCancer: a self-tracking platform for both oncology patients and physicians to allow standardised treatment
• Weight of evidence and reliability of meta-analysis
• Were meta-analyses of etiological studies of high methodological qualities?
• Were the outcomes reported in systematic reviews stated in protocols? A systematic review
• What action when there is no evidence?
• What are the barriers preventing authors from reading written instructions?
• What are the barriers to, and facilitators of, implementing and receiving MHPSS programmes delivered to populations affected by humanitarian emergencies? A qualitative evidence synthesis
• What are the characteristics of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression?
• What are the characteristics of good reviews of adverse effects? A qualitative exploration
• What are the most efficient approaches to designing a systematic search strategy: a systematic review
• What are the opportunities for co-production in living evidence synthesis?
• What are the principles for the use of AI/ML in evidence syntheses?
• What are the reporting and methodological qualities of network meta-analysis?
• What Blocks the Production of Cochrane Reviews in China?
• What can a trial registry do for you? The Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: a resource for Cochrane authors
• What can be learned on synthesizing evidence on deimplementation of low-value health care practices: an overview of reviews
• What can evidence-based education and healthcare learn from each other?
• What can The Cochrane Collaboration do to support people living in developing countries? A survey
• What can we change through social media? Learning from sharing experience and evidence on sexual problems
• What can we learn from Chinese randomized controlled trials? A systematic review of Chinese venlafaxine studies
• What certainty can there be on how much treatments Work: empirical insight from recursive cumulative meta-analyses
• What characteristics classify 'experience' with data abstraction?
• What could be expected from systematic reviews on individual patient data? Examples from hypertension treatment
• What criteria exist to justify evidence claims? A cross-disciplinary scoping map
  
• What determinants of public health research activity contextualise embedded researcher roles? A qualitative investigation in English local government
• What difference does patient and public involvement make to evidence synthesis?
• What dissemination bias really means and how we can tackle it
• What do authors of Cochrane reviews mean by the term 'older' people?
• What do clinicians understand and how do they interpret results from network meta-analysis and the way they are presented?
• What do Cochrane Systematic Reviews say about conservative and surgical treatment interventions in the treatment of rotator cuff disease?
• What do Cochrane Systematic Reviews say about telemedicine on healthcare?
• What do consumers think should be reported about consumer involvement in research?
• What do funders do to minimize waste in research?
• What do journals' author instructions state on search methods for systematic reviews: from evidence to implementation
  
• What do patients and physicians want at the point of care? Preliminary surveys in China
• What do patients and their caregivers value on self-management interventions for chronic conditions? A scoping review of systematic reviews for the COMPAR-EU project
• What do test-treat trials measure?
• What do we know about interpretation and application of test accuracy measures?
• What do you mean there's no mean?
• What do you mean? Collated consumer feedback on Cochrane reviews and protocols on topics in pregnancy
• What does good co-production in evidence synthesis look and feel like?
• What does it mean? Plain language summaries of advice on health technologies
• What evidence based information do psychologists need?
  
  A Belgian perspective
• What evidence is available and what is required, in humanitarian assistance?
• What factors predict original research citation rates? Analysis of media reports, editorials, guidelines and reviews of Rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; 1997-2003)
• What German hospital pharmacists want to know: cross-sectional survey on information behaviour and information needs
• What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews? a scoping review and qualitative metasummary
• What happens after the HTA analysis? A follow-up study of regional HTA reports conducted 2007-2015
• What Happens When the Evidence Is Not There?: The Contribution of Systematic Review Methodology to Future Research
• What happens when you take the Cochrane methodology and apply it to non-clinical literature?
• What if EPOC reviews only included studies from MEDLINE?
• What influences clinical decision-making in China? A scoping review
• What information resources are searched to prepare systematic reviews of economic evaluations?
• What is a good PICO-Question? Bringing together perspectives of guideline developers and authors of systematic reviews
  
• What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature showed heterogeneous study designs and definitions
• What is a rapid review?
• What is being published? A word cloud of titles from The Cochrane Library
• What Is Going on in the Future For Evidence-Informed Health Policy-Making?
• What is Needed to Make Guidelines Computable?: A consensus-development exercise
  
• What is the current situation of the published N-of-1 trial?
• What is the definition of "evidence" in Health Sciences?
• What is the effect of phasing out long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on the concentrations of perfluoroalkyl acids and their precursors in the environment?
• What is the evidence for collaborative approaches between service users and community mental health nurses to identify and support survivors of Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) using a rapid review approach?