Variation among experienced reviewers in the interpretation of the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Oral
2006 Dublin
Shrier I, Furlan A, Steele R, Platt R, Brophy J, Boivin J, Rossignol M, Kakuma R
Conclusions: Presented with identical data, different reviewers interpret the results of meta-analyses differently. Analyses to explore the reasons for these differences are in progress