• ACURATE: a guide for reporting sham controls in trials using acupuncture
• Acute Pain Assessment Tools: Quality Appraisal of Measurement Properties
• Adaptation as method for clinical practice guideline development or implementation: a systematic review update
• Adaptation of a British Medical Journal (BMJ) Rapid Recommendation: Challenges and perspectives
• Adaptation of clinical practice guidelines to address wound management according to the ADAPTE-process
• Adaptation of the European Guidelines on Breast Cancer Screening to the Tunisian setting using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach
• Adapting ADAPTE for faster guideline development
  
• ADAPTING CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES TO DIGITAL TOOLS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY
• Adapting diagnostic review methods to summarise the properties of psychometric instruments: a case study of diagnosing postnatal depression (PND) in primary care
• Adapting evidence-based peri-discharge complex interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among Heart Failure and COPD patients in Hong Kong
• Adapting fishbone diagrams: a new approach for displaying findings of systematic reviews
• Adapting foreign guidelines on post-stroke dysphagia identification and management to local context in China
• Adapting global evidence-based practice guidelines to the Iranian health care context for management of female lower urinary tract symptoms
• Adapting knowledge translation interventions for health equity considerations: an interactive workshop
• Adapting national to international guidelines and back – an example on groin hernia guidelines
• Adapting the GRADE approach to guide the evidence assessment in IPCC reports
  
• Adapting the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to facilitate robust decision-making : two case studies
  
• Adapting the procedures of a hospital guidelines committee to International standards
  
• Adding evidence from non-randomized patients to a randomized trial
• Adding evidence to Wikipedia: edit-a-thon
• Adding evidence to Wikipedia: edit-a-thon
• Adding evidence to Wikipedia: editing workshop
• Adding non-randomized and non-controlled studies to an existing review on the effectiveness of chronic disease management programs for asthmatic patients
• Adding unpublished Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data changes the results of meta-analyses
• Adding value to hand searching
• Additional literature search in Cochrane reviews: how, what and why?
• Addressing between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: application to stroke prevention treatments for Atrial Fibrillation patients
• Addressing challenges in the conduct of a systematic review of clinical prediction models in rheumatoid arthritis
• Addressing co-morbidities of spondyloarthritis through patient organization partnerships
• Addressing confusion in evidence synthesis: developing a structured taxonomy for informing the synthesis of evidence to inform policy and practice
• Addressing dilemmas and conflicting interests faced by Cochrane review authors
• Addressing financial conflicts of interest: evaluating workshops with consumers
• Addressing gaps in American Indian/Alaska Native cancer control and prevention
• Addressing harms of screening – a review of outcomes in Cochrane reviews and suggestions for next steps
• Addressing inequities in healthcare research
• Addressing interdependency of data when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• Addressing methodological challenges in evaluating diagnostic tests: Combining the GRADE approach and the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to produce clinical recommendations
• Addressing missing participant data for continuous outcomes assessed with different instruments: a guide for systematic review authors
• Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews: Continuous outcomes—Part 2
• Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews: dichotomous outcomes
• Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews: dichotomous outcomes – Part 1
• Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews. Part 1: dichotomous outcomes
• Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews. Part 2: continuous outcomes
• Addressing multimorbidity in or beyond guidelines
• Addressing problems of non-transportability when combining treatment effects across patient populations in meta-analyses: a causality framework
• Addressing racial health inequity: systematic review of systematic reviews
• Addressing reporting bias in systematic reviews
• Addressing resource limitations among systematic review groups
• Addressing Results of Critical Appraisal in JBI Qualitative Systematic Reviews: An Analysis of Practices
• Addressing the Dental Caries Burden in India: A Global Imperative for Evidence Translation and Implementation
  
• Addressing the global health workforce shortfall by 2030: The need for intersectoral research evidence
• Addressing the information needs of the lay reader: how much is enough?
• Adequacy of information on funding and financial conflicts of interest in clinical trial publications and how to obtain missing information: methodological study
• Adequate adjustment for confounders is vital for a valid interpretation of meta-analyses incorporating non-randomized studies
• Adherence and quality of systematic reviews for automatically registered protocols: a PROSPERO register study
• Adherence of Cochrane reviews and protocols to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
• Adherence of systematic reviews on photobiomodulation to the protocol registration. Meta-research study
  
• Adherence to IMMPACT outcome reporting recommendations among trials assessing the effect of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain
• Adherence to non-financial conflicts of interest policy in Cochrane reviews where authors are also editorial board members
• Adherence to PRISMA 2020 statement in non-Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. A meta-epidemiological study
• Adherence to reporting guidelines in biomedical journals of Latin America
• Adjusted analyses in studies addressing therapy and harm: A users’ guide to the medical literature
• Adjusting for bias in unblinded randomized controlled trials
• Adjusting for exposure misclassification in an individual participant data meta-analysis of observational studies
• Adjusting for indirectness in comparative test accuracy meta-analyses
• Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis
• Adjusting for publication bias: a multiple imputation approach
• Adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis: combining empirical evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment
• Adjustment for covariates in non-randomized studies: propensity score based methods vs classical regression models
• Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality score ranking should be abandoned
• Adolescent mothers’ access and use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping review protocol
• Adolescents and young adults’ experiences of living with everyday pain – a qualitative metasynthesis
• Adopting a knowledge translation framework and applying information strategies for fall prevention among hospitalised patients
• Adopting an adapted approach to developing scoping review protocols: an experience report
• Adopting an integrated knowledge approach to promote impactful systematic reviews and enhance evidence-informed health policymaking: reflections and lessons learned from a middle-income country
• Adoption of automation tools to undertake scoping reviews
• Adult ADHD trials with methylphenidate have severely restricted study populations and should be revisited
• Adults with kidney disease and dietary recommendations: integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence to involve patient perspectives
• Advance care planning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients -A best practice implementation project
  
• Advanced Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) workshop
• Advanced EPOC Methods Workshop
• Advanced meta-analysis 1: Random-effects methods to be implemented in RevMan
• Advanced meta-analysis 2: Performing meta-analysis in the presence of rare events
• Advanced meta-analysis 2: performing meta-analysis in the presence of rare events
  
• Advanced meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance: investigating heterogeneity and comparing tests
• Advanced meta-analysis—dealing with heterogeneity and test comparisons
• Advanced Q&A session for Embase
• Advanced searching for systematic reviews
• Advanced searching masterclass: Cochrane Library
• Advanced searching masterclass: The Cochrane Library
• Advanced Searching on The Cochrane Library
• Advanced workshop for Cochrane Trials Search Co-ordinators (closed)
• Advancement of the methodological quality through a measurement tool to assess reviews: AMSTAR
• Advances in guideline development: A scoping review of key innovations
• Advancing Health Technology Assessment Knowledge in Brazil to Inform Health Decision-Making
• Advancing methods for overviews of reviews: a discussion of challenges and potential solutions
• Advancing quality in health policy decision-making in the face of uncertainty: an integrated review to characterize and address uncertainty
• Advancing racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines
• Advancing research integrity: a programme to embed good practice in Africa
• Advancing the methods of conducting a systematic review alongside a realist review: an example investigating 'what' interventions are effective and 'why' for improving outcomes for seniors with multi-morbidity
• Advantage and disadvantage between GRADE system and CINeMA approach to rate the certainty of network meta-analysis
• Advantages and challenges of including randomised and non-randomised evidence in a systematic review: example of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma
• Advantages of the meta-analysis of individual patient data: an example from superficial bladder cancer.
• Adverse effects in systematic reviews: challenges for formulating the question and searching for different studies and sources of information
• Adverse effects in systematic reviews: challenges for formulating the question and searching for different studies and sources of information
• Adverse effects in systematic reviews: Challenges for formulating the question and searching for different studies and sources of information
• Adverse effects of radiation therapy in vulnerable patients with head and neck cancer before and after the implementation of evidence
• Adverse effects reviews of opioids - a key element for balanced systematic reviews and guidelines
• Adverse events and adverse effects in systematic reviews: some methodological issues
• Adverse events of antiepileptic drugs, across indications: Can randomised controlled trial data from non-epilepsy indications be included in meta-analysis for AEDs used in epilepsy?
• Advocating evidence-based shared decision-making implementation for clinical teachers: A mixed-method approach
• Advocating for Cochrane evidence: packaging Cochrane HIV/AIDS summaries
• Advocating for greater evidence communication and use of evidence: new and upcoming GRADE guidance
• Affiliational bias in arguments regarding the use of systematic reviews in health policy decision making
• Affiliational bias in arguments regarding the use of systematic reviews in health policy decision making
• African Community for Systematic Reviews needs assessment among researchers in low- and middle-income countries
• African randomized controlled trials - too hard to find?
• African Trials Register: 5 years later, where are we now?
• After MEDLINE? Dividend from other potential sources of randomised controlled trials
• Aggregate Data Meta-Analysis With Time-To Event Outcomes: A Tutorial
• Aggregating published prediction models with individual participant data: combining models with different predictors
• Aggregating published prediction models with individual patient data: A comparison of different approaches
• AGREE II: Advancing development, reporting, and evaluation of practice guidelines
• Agree instrument: A good instrument for family practice training
• Agreeing to disagree: an analysis of the responses to critical appraisal questions in postgraduate students
• Agreement and alignment: Current status of clinical practice guidelines within the Southern African Development Community
• Agreement between data-based and opinion-based predictions of biases affecting randomised trials within systematic reviews
• Agreement between systematic reviews (SRs) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on drug treatment in acute stroke
• Agreement in results data between conference abstracts and full reports of randomized controlled trials: should we depend on conference abstracts?
• Agreement in the assessment of systematic reviews with the AMSTAR 2 tool: novice versus expert methodologists
• Agreement of treatment effects from observational studies using causal modelling and randomised trials: Meta-epidemiological study
• Agreements about risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on different interdental cleaning aids
• Agreements on publication rights: an investigation of protocols and publications of randomized clinical trials
• AHRQ EPC Methods Report: Characterising research evidence needs of hospitals and healthcare systems in the US
• AHRQ EPC pilot projects: improving health systems' access to high quality evidence
• AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center and NIH Pathways to Prevention programs: A decade-long partnership in closing evidence gaps
• AI for Dummies: Do DistillerSR AI Tools Improve Screening Efficiency for Evidence Syntheses?
• AI in action: shaping the future development and use of guidelines
• AI-driven assessment of the application of GRADE evidence-to-decision frameworks in German oncological guidelines
  
• AI-Powered Dialogues with Scientific Literature: A Novel Approach to Risk of Bias Analysis Using ROB 2 in PDF Articles
  
• Alendronate for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
• Algorithms for reaching risk-of-bias judgments in randomised trials
• Alive: A new collaborative approach for ensuring users have the evidence they need, when they need it.
• All that glitters is not gold: predatory journals may be open access, but not openly accessible
• All together now, a global perspective: inclusion of HTA recommendations into guidelines, assessments for currency, and triggers for updates
  
• Allowing for both relevance and rigour in evidence synthesis – a bivariate power prior approach
• ALOIS Community
• ALOIS, ScreenToGo and the Cochrane Register of Studies: using mobile technology to engage and involve consumers in the work of the Cochrane Collaboration
• Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type-2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• Alternative distributions for random effects meta-analysis model
• Alternative methods for conducting qualitative syntheses: Primary data versus published findings
• Alternative strategy to ensure patient perspective in Clinical Practice Guideline: the case of Brucellosis in Brazilian Unified Health System
  
• Alternative strategy to identify systematic reviews in the context of a guideline
• Alternative Therapies for Viral Hepatitis in Chinese Textbook of Infectious Diseases: What is the Evidence?
• Aluminium therapy in the prevention and treatment of silicosis: used for over 30 years in Canada but generally rejected elsewhere.
• Amalgamating individual patient data for meta-analysis: An IT perspective
• Ambiguity of study population analysis and reporting in asthma clinical trials
• Aminopyridines for symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis
• Amiodarone for arrhythmia in Chagas patients: A systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis
• AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools: our first-hand experience
• AMSTAR-2’s inter-rater reliability for quality assessment in an overview of interventions to prevent adverse events in the ICU
  
• AMSTAR: helping decision makers distinguish high and low quality systematic reviews that include non-randomized studies
• AMSTAR2 or ROBIS to teach evidence synthesis?
• An ‘all-in-one’ meta-analysis model: joint synthesis of multiple outcomes to compare multiple interventions
• An accessible method Of further regression analysis within Cochrane reviews: The problem Of demonstrating equivalence
• An adaptable framework for analysing diversity, context and inequalities in systematic reviews
• An algorithm to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews
• An alternative method for presenting assessments of risk of bias in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China
• An analysis of randomized controlled trials of tuberculosis prophylaxis and treatment in Africa
• An analysis of the current situation of evidence-based methodology of clinical guidelines in China
• An analysis Of the neurological Cochrane review group modules
• An analysis of the transparency of narrative synthesis methods in systematic reviews of quantitative data
• An analysis of theory building in realist synthesis: perspectives from the literature
• An analytical apparatus for including and presenting art-research evidence in a systematic review
• An analytical apparatus for including art-research evidence in a systematic review
• An approach for eliciting utilities for patients’ health outcomes with guideline panels
• An approach for systematic review teams to engage policymakers and stakeholders: from question selection to knowledge translation
• An approach to deal with the absence of cohort studies in prognosis systematic reviews: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
• An approach to disinvestment: an Italian experience
• An approach to evaluate the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis
• An assessment of the design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis inconsistency
• An assessment of the performance of meta-analytical methods for pooling intervention effects based on continuous data
• An audit of the data structures of four international clinical trial registries
• AN EBOOK AS AN IMPLEMENTATION TOOL FOR CLINICIANS: THE COCHRANE REHABILITATION EXPERIENCE WITH OVERVIEWS OF COCHRANE REVIEWS
  
• An education and skills-building program to deliver competent, confident, and efficient evidence-users
• An educational package for the management of menorrhagia in the East Anglian region
• An effective model for training social workers in evidence-based practice in Korea
• An efficient approach to identify eligible studies for 102 PICO (population, intervention, control, outcome) questions
• An efficient search strategy identifying primary papers on diagnostic test evaluations
• An effort in promoting evidence-informed decision making in health and education: experience from Thailand
• An effort of evidence-based medicine in Brazil to provide the best healthcare evidence for the community of Portuguese-speaking countries
• An electronic data repository of randomized controlled trials for the treatment of depressive disorders
• An emerging digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem for malaria: Rapid creation and dissemination of trustworthy recommendations in Africa
• An empirical assessment of bivariate methods for meta-analysis of test performance
• An empirical assessment of minimal important differences in network meta-analysis
• An empirical assessment of the validity of uncontrolled comparisons of the accuracy of diagnostic tests
• An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy
• An empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta-analysis for categorical outcomes
• An empirical investigation of clinical trialists' views regarding methods to conceal allocation