• Building national implementation strategies for chronic diseases guidelines in primary health care setting: results from Korean primary care physicians’ baseline survey 2015 Vienna
• Building Partnerships Across the Systematic Review Community in the United States: Efforts by the AHRQ EPC Program 2023 London
• Building partnerships with the public by learning about Cochrane evidence 2015 Vienna
• Building research capacity beyond the classroom: a sociomaterial inquiry into academic health librarians' online teaching of evidence synthesis methods 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Building the evidence base for children’s and family support services using practice-based evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Building the research capacity of medical officers of the Government of Nepal in health-system research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Building up a disease-specific trials register in hemato-oncology: experiences from a project of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG) 2004 Ottawa
• Bunches of evidence: displaying 'Summary of findings' tables visually as ‘evidence flowers’ 2015 Vienna
• Burden of brain tumours in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review protocol 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• But is it relevant? Applying the results of Cochrane Reviews to high-risk and disadvantaged populations. 2000 Cape Town
• By how much does publication bias affect the results of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy? 2004 Ottawa
• C.H.A.I.N. Canada - Contact, Help, Advice & Information, Network: linking professions, organisations, researchers, practitioners and policy makers 2004 Ottawa
• CADIMA: An Open Access online tool supporting the reporting and conduct of systematic reviews and systematic maps 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• CADTH's Health Technology Inquiry Service: providing relevant and timely evidence for Canadian health care decision makers 2007 Sao Paulo
• Café Scientifique—public outreach 2013 Québec City
• Calcium antagonists in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): a meta-analysis 1996 Adelaide
• Calcium Antagonists Risk-Benefit and Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes: Review of Literature and Drug Utilization Profile 1999 Rome
• Calculating confidence intervals for a net-effect estimate 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Calculating confidence intervals for the absolute risk reduction taking uncertainties of relative risk and baseline risk estimates into account 2013 Québec City
• Calculating costs: facing challenges for a cost comparison of day surgical and inpatient varicose vein surgery as an example 2015 Vienna
• Calculating standardised mean differences from cluster randomised trials using published sources 2005 Melbourne
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT) 2008 Freiburg
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT) 2013 Québec City
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/H) 2016 Seoul
• Calculation of absolute risk for important outcomes in patients with and without a prognostic factor of interest 2019 Santiago
• Calculation of Numbers Needed to Treat from Systematic Reviews. Point estimate and Confidence Intervals compared using six different methods. 1999 Rome
• Calculation of variance of treatment effects when these are not reported for all arms of trials with more than two arms 2011 Madrid
• CAMELOT approach: considering methodological limitations of qualitative research within the context of GRADE-CERQual and QES 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can a generative AI chatbot answer citizens' questions on behalf of municipal employees? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can American Indian and Alaska Native populations ever have a sufficient research base for best practices? 2012 Auckland
• Can an evidence-informed taxonomy be used to map vaccination communication interventions in ‘real world’ settings? Findings from Nigeria 2015 Vienna
• Can analysis of the effect of social disadvantage on health outcomes be improved through the use of causal pathways? 2014 Hyderabad
• Can artificial intelligence learn to identify systematic reviews on the effectiveness of public health interventions? 2020 Abstracts
• Can artificial intelligence perform accurate peer review of literature search strategies? A proof-of-concept study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can assessors in a trial of psychotherapy be successfully blinded? 2015 Vienna
• Can brief interventions reduce alcohol consumption in drinkers at risk of alcohol related harm? A meta-analysis of clinical trials 1994 Hamilton
• Can Cinderalla's sisters make it to the ball? Summary reviews/overviews within revMan 4.1. 2000 Cape Town
• Can Cochrane's machine learning classifier increase the efficiency of guideline production? 2018 Edinburgh
• Can consumers improve the quality of Cochrane reviews? 2004 Ottawa
• Can data extraction from figures perform a meta-analysis? 2012 Auckland
• Can diagnostic filters offer similar sensitivity and a reduced number needed to read compared to searches based on index test and target condition? 2008 Freiburg
• Can English-speaking reviewers correctly identify foreignlanguage articles that meet eligibility criteria for a systematic review of management for fibromyalgia? 2012 Auckland
• Can evidence-based journal clubs promote knowledge translation in real-world clinical settings? 2019 Santiago
• Can exercise prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women? Meta-analysis of (R) CT's on the effects of endurance and strength training on bone mass 2000 Cape Town
• Can generalizability be considered in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy? 2011 Madrid
• Can Indirect comparisons be improved using individual patient data? 2000 Cape Town
• Can large language models replace humans in the systematic review process? Evaluating GPT-4’s efficacy in screening and extracting data 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can Qualitative Comparative Analysis help us to identify important components of complex interventions? 2014 Hyderabad
• Can rapid-learning health systems accommodate individual participant data (IPD)? An example of the timelines involved in an IPD meta-analysis 2020 Abstracts
• Can summarising trials of public health strategies by camparator design improve interpretation? 2005 Melbourne
• Can systematic reviewing be adapted for hypothesis testing in medicine and biology? 1996 Adelaide
• Can systematic reviews provide the evidence needed for making regulatory decisions? An FDA's statistician's perspective 1998 Baltimore
• Can the Cochrane RCT classifier be used to speed up screening for a qualitative evidence synthesis? A retrospective evaluation 2023 London
• Can the impact of an erroneous review be corrected? 2005 Melbourne
• Can trial quality be reliably assessed from a trial publication? 2011 Madrid
• Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? 2007 Sao Paulo
• Can we GRADE chimeric-antigen-receptor T-cell therapies? The guideline development process of the Italian Society of Hematology. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can we make patient versions of guidelines more applicable to patients and the public? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can we reduce the workload of systematic reviews without compromising quality? A new platform to accelerate search and study identification 2023 London
• Can we trust patient reported outcomes in the absence of blinding? Preliminary results from an analysis of trials included in systematic reviews of interventions for chronic conditions 2010 Keystone
• Can we trust preprints when we need the newest data during outbreak response? An evaluation of mpox preprints 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can we trust the conclusion in peer-review publications? A review of quality improvement intervention studies 2005 Melbourne
• Can we trust what we read on reviews abstracts of interventions for low back pain? A methodological review 2018 Edinburgh
• Can we use GRADE to create new diagnostic criteria for a condition? An application of GRADE principles for establishing diagnostic criteria for a disease 2023 London
• Can we use non-research papers in systematic reviews to assess organisational processes? Lessons from a review on immunization advisory committees 2018 Edinburgh
• Can we use overviews to reduce research waste? An example from a population-level intervention overview 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Can we use results from a broader study population for conclusions about the treatment effect in a subpopulation of interest? 2018 Edinburgh
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Education and Training Project 2004-05 2005 Melbourne
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Partners Forum: strengthening partnerships to increase evidence-based decision-making 2013 Québec City
• Canadian practitioners’ opioid-related treatment practices: A scoping review 2020 Abstracts
• Cannabis for medical purposes and Chronic Pain: Recommendations of an evidence based clinical practice guideline from the McMaster University 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capacity building and health system strengthening through Cochrane sensitization and training in the Caribbean 2012 Auckland
• Capacity building for evidence-based child health through digital platforms 2020 Abstracts
• Capacity building in conducting systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capacity building in Evidence Based Child Health: six years’ experience 2020 Abstracts
• Capacity building in systematic reviews in South Asia: a South-North collaboration to expand the production and translation of synthesized evidence 2011 Madrid
• Capacity building to improve the quality and reproducibility of search methods 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capacity building to produce useful evidence: Who sets the agenda? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capacity-sharing for improved filtering of information for decision-making in the African context 2015 Vienna
• Capitalizing on global partnerships to build evidence-based practice expertise, synthesis and implementation in nursing academia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capturing the broader impact of research and innovation: Outcome mapping in a product research and development project 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Capturing the primary outcome for Cochrane reviews of deprescribing specific medications: an overview of Cochrane reviews 2023 London
• Caracteristics and primary outcomes of clinical trials registries on COVID-19 vaccines A meta-research. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cardiovascular risk in climacteric women: a need for a comprehensive guideline 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cardiovascular risk screening tools for athletes, a Scoping Review. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• CARE-radiology statement explanation and elaboration: reporting guideline for radiological case reports 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Caregiver-provided and home-based individual cognitive stimulation: the cultural adaptation process guided by the systematic review method and community involvement approach 2020 Abstracts
• Caregiving Experience of Parents of Children with Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Carnival time: a mapping exercise of Brazilian oral health journals 2008 Freiburg
• Case report of a satellite effort: The Denver Satellite of the Cochrane Skin Group 2005 Melbourne
• Case study on comprehensive searching in the area of overcrowding in emergency departments 2005 Melbourne
• Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies 2005 Melbourne
• Catalyzing collective action for impact: role of the Global Coalition for Evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Categorising continuous risk factors: issues and implications 2013 Québec City
• Categorizing conflicts of interest in healthcare research: a proposed framework 2016 Seoul
• Cats and dogs – a training example for GRADE 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Causal and associational language in observational health research: a systematic evaluation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Causal chain analysis as a way of understanding how interventions work 2019 Santiago
• Causal Forest Analysis for Inclusive Evidence Generation and Informed Decision-Making in Development Interventions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Causal mapping for systematic reviews of complex social intervention 2011 Madrid
• Causal modelling in RCTs: how results compare to ITT and other analytical methods – a meta-epidemiological analysis 2018 Edinburgh
• Caveats in the meta-analysis of continuous data: a simulation study 2006 Dublin
• CBRG QuickDecks: a new tool for sharing the best evidence in back and neck pain care 2015 Vienna
• Celebrity Deathmatch: Burden of disease vs. RCTs in the Southern cone of Latin America 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• CENTRAL Cleanup and HarmoniSR 2014 Hyderabad
• CENTRAL HELLIS: searching for the lost trials of South-East Asia 2006 Dublin
• Centralised Cochrane review updating: the experience of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group 2006 Dublin
• Centre of Health Technology Assessment of Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Using EBM to qualify and promote the sustainability of Brazilian public health system (SUS) 2020 Abstracts
• CEOsys – An ecosystem for COVID-19 evidence in Germany: challenges and lessons learned as a guide for future networks 2023 London
• Certainty of evidence and level of recommendation for complex versus simple interventions in Chilean clinical guidelines. 2020 Abstracts
• Certainty of evidence from Cochrane Reviews on Neonatal Sepsis 2023 London
• Certainty of evidence in Summary of Findings Tables from Cochrane network meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
• Certainty of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals? 2023 London
• Certainty of net benefit: A concept between quality of evidence and strength of recommendation 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cervical Cancer And Sexual Lifestyle : A Systematic Review of Health Education Interventions 1999 Rome
• Challenge and strategy of developing country participating in Cochrane collaboration - experience of Chinese Cochrane center 2000 Cape Town
• Challenges and Achievements of Implementing Evidence-Based Psychology in Brazil 2023 London
• Challenges and considerations in assessing the reporting quality of systematic reviews in overviews using PRISMA 2015 Vienna
• Challenges and considerations involved in using AMSTAR in overviews of reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• Challenges and facilitators for early career researchers completing systematic or scoping reviews in the health sciences: a scoping review 2019 Santiago
• Challenges and innovations in evidence synthesis and evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic 2023 London
• Challenges and inspirations in disseminating clinical evidence on Traditional Chinese Medicine: 10 years' experiences from volunteers 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges and opportunities for utilizing systematic reviews in zoonotic public health 2007 Sao Paulo
• Challenges and opportunities in developing a web-based systematic review data repository 2012 Auckland
• Challenges and opportunities of Evidence-Based Research in rapid learning health systems 2020 Abstracts
• Challenges and potential solutions for reporting findings from multicomponent meta-regression models in GRADE summary of findings tables 2023 London
• Challenges and promises of cultural adaption of the Claim Evaluation Tools – an on-going process of validation in Poland 2023 London
• Challenges and solutions when carrying out mixed methods literature reviews in resource constrained settings 2015 Vienna
• Challenges and strategies for implementing the STAR tool of comprehensive evaluation for guidelines: a qualitative study with Chinese physicians 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges and strategies in developing a search strategy for systematic reviews of textual evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges and strategies in developing guidelines on health care problems requiring multimodal patient-centered approaches 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges and strategies of increasing production of Cochrane reviews in China 2000 Cape Town
• Challenges associated with assessing co-dependent (‘test and treat’) technologies 2012 Auckland
• Challenges conducting a Cochrane Review of public health ‘implementation strategies’ 2015 Vienna
• Challenges faced and lessons learned from doing overviews of systematic reviews of complex interventions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges facing reviewers preparing overviews of reviews 2011 Madrid
• Challenges for conducting overviews including observational primary studies 2019 Santiago
• Challenges for conducting rapid reviews for health policy and guideline development 2018 Edinburgh
• Challenges for evidence-based decision making in Korea 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges for formulary recommendations: limita­tions of outcome data reported in systematic reviews 2009 Singapore
• Challenges in applying GRADE to health systems and public health interventions 2012 Auckland
• Challenges in applying PLS guidance for diagnostic test accuracy reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• Challenges in assessing interventions in ICT based cognitive remediation for people with schizophrenia - preparing a systematic review and meta-analysis 2012 Auckland
• Challenges in conducing systematic reviews for diagnostic and prognostic testing in genomics and personalized medicine (GPM) 2010 Keystone
• Challenges in conducting a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy of genetic test: an example of the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia 2013 Québec City
• Challenges in conducting a systematic review of predictors and moderators of outcome: an example in psychological therapies for OCD 2013 Québec City
• Challenges in conducting an overview of reviews evaluating diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty screening tools: a practical example 2016 Seoul
• Challenges in conducting Cochrane systematic reviews in traditional Chinese medicine: how has the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group helped? 2009 Singapore
• Challenges in conducting economic evaluation informed by Cochrane Reviews: case study of adherence in epilepsy 2014 Hyderabad
• Challenges in conducting priority setting exercises for Cochrane entities 2012 Auckland
• Challenges in designing and delivering prognostic factor systematic reviews: experience from three reviews 2023 London
• Challenges in disseminating review findings: a case study 2006 Dublin
• Challenges in Evidence synthesis for Anti-Malarial Drug Resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa -A Causal Pathway for Evaluating Indirectness using GRADE approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges in SDM education: the heterogeneity of SDM training programs and the search for consensus on core competencies 2013 Québec City
• Challenges in synthesising evidence from implementation and dissemination studies: experience from two systematic scoping reviews 2016 Seoul
• Challenges in the assessment of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies 2010 Keystone
• Challenges in the development of a national guideline for the management of snakebite envenoming 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges in the methodology and implementation of an exemplar Cochrane Review of prognostic factor studies 2019 Santiago
• Challenges in using RoB2: worked example from a systematic review of remote therapies for alcohol and drug misuse. 2023 London
• Challenges of assessing the quality of scientific evidence for public health interventions 2012 Auckland
• Challenges of complex interventions: a worked example 2013 Québec City
• Challenges of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled trial of spinal surgery: the SUcceSS placebo-controlled trial of spinal surgery 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges of conducting a systematic review on the prevalence of rare diseases 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges of coordinating large-scale systematic reviews 2023 London
• Challenges of developing a geographic search filter to identify randomized controlled trials in Africa: finding the optimal balance between sensitivity and precision 2008 Freiburg
• Challenges of developing a geographic search filter to identify randomized controlled trials in Africa: finding the optimal balance between sensitivity and precision 2007 Sao Paulo
• Challenges of overviews of reviews and how to overcome them, informed by a public health overview 2016 Seoul
• Challenges of systematic reviews in the field of traditional Chinese medicine 2023 London
• Challenges to the implementation of the New Guidelines for Breast Cancer Early Detection in Brazil 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges to validity in two applications of network meta-analysis to complex social interventions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges using patient reported outcomes for functional abilities and quality of life in older adults 2010 Keystone
• Challenges with developing trustworthy, living clinical practice guidelines on artificial intelligence technologies, such as Computer Aided Detection in colonoscopy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Challenges with integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence through mixed methods systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
• Challenges, opportunities, and the future of publishing evidence synthesis products 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Change score or follow-up score? An empirical evaluation of the impact of choice of mean difference estimates 2015 Vienna
• Changes in knowledge and utilisation of the Cochrane Collaboration by primary health care workers in Argentina from 2002 to 2005 2005 Melbourne
• Changes in randomized controlled trial reporting quality over time: A systematic review of pediatric journals from China 2011 Madrid
• Changes in treatment over time of women diagnosed with breast cancer: an opportunity to reduce overtreatment 2019 Santiago
• Changing patterns of clinical trial activity in Australia: 2005-2013 2014 Hyderabad
• Changing physician practice patterns: methods for implementing clinical research and guidelines 2013 Québec City
• Changing practice: encouraging the use of ECV for women with a breech presentation at term 1997 Amsterdam
• Changing professional behaviour: an updated overview of systematic reviews 2007 Sao Paulo
• Changing Professional Behaviour: An Updated Overview of Systematic Reviews 2010 Keystone
• Characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on hypertension treatments: a cross-sectional study 2016 Seoul
• Characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on stroke treatments: a cross-sectional study 2016 Seoul
• Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster-randomized trials in children: an assessment using the CONSORT statement for CRTs (CONSORT-CRT) 2010 Keystone
• Characteristics and Reporting of Seamless Early-Phase Trials in Oncology - A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Characteristics of authorships in oral health group systematic reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• Characteristics of clinical studies used objective performance criteria 2019 Santiago
• Characteristics of clinical trials on drug-drug interaction registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov from 2005 to 2015 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Characteristics of cross-over trials in dentistry and oral health reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• Characteristics of GRADE using for WHO guidelines on public health issue: an evidence mapping 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Characteristics of Meta-analyses and Included Trials Associated with Data Contribution to Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials 2020 Abstracts
• Characteristics of meta-analyses submitted to a general medical journal 1998 Baltimore
• Characteristics of network meta-analysis reviews from Cochrane 2015 Vienna
• Characteristics of physicians who receive large payments from industry and the accuracy of their disclosures in concurrent publications 2011 Madrid
• Characteristics of published scoping reviews: a scoping review of scoping reviews 2013 Québec City
• Characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in Latin America and the Caribbean’s (LAC) in 2010 2011 Madrid
• Characteristics of randomized trials that have been extended by linkage to routinely collected data: results of a scoping review of the published literature 2018 Edinburgh
• Characteristics of realist synthesis reviews: a systematic mapping review of realist reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• Characteristics of research sample in meta-epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Characteristics of research sample in meta-epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Characteristics of studies included for HTA reports 2011 Madrid
• Characteristics of the authors of acupuncture related Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2013 Québec City
• Characteristics of the reporting of funding by trial authors: a systematic survey of 200 randomized controlled trials 2016 Seoul
• Characteristics, reporting, and methods of trials included in time-to-event meta-analyses of systematic reviews: A meta-epidemiological review 2023 London
• Characterizing methodological approaches used in network meta-analysis of psychological interventions: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• CHARMS and PROBAST at your fingertips: a template for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews of predictive models 2023 London
• ChatGPT and large language models for systematic review tasks: What are the opportunities for improvement? 2023 London
• ChatGPT helps non-native English speakers scientists improve their manuscript readability 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Checking important journals for important trials: does this make sense? 2005 Melbourne
• Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews 2009 Singapore
• Checking the checkboxes: A review of the appropriateness of performance measures 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Checking the checkboxes: How to critically appraise performance measures 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Checking the methodological quality of clinical studies about voice and larynx published in two Brazilian and two international papers indexed by Medline 2007 Sao Paulo
• CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction in systematic Reviews of clinical prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) 2015 Vienna
• Checklist for Neurological Review Article 1999 Rome
• Checklist for the application of the consensus approach in the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines 2023 London
• Checklist of the methodological elaboration of an evidence-based health policy brief 2019 Santiago
• Checklist to help peer reviewers detect errors in meta-analysis in systematic reviews of interventions: results from the development process 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Chemotherapy in high-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (RCTS). 2000 Cape Town
• Chemotherapy of patients with early stage multiple myeloma and eligible for autologous stem cell transplant in different guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Chest computed tomography for the diagnosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): evidence and effectiveness 2020 Abstracts
• Child labour and health: a scoping review 2019 Santiago
• Children with asthma and steroid treatment. A meta-ethnography synthesis on how Cochrane reviews findings have been considered in international guidelines 2010 Keystone
• Chilean guideline for budget impact analysis 2019 Santiago
• CHIMERAS showed better inter-rater reliability and inter-consensus reliability than GRADE in grading quality of evidence: a randomized controlled trial 2018 Edinburgh
• China’s conflict of interest management in clinical research: a literature review 2019 Santiago
• Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality for five leading Chinese medical journals 2008 Freiburg
• Chinese Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews of Cochrane Library: A nationwide survey of utilization in Taiwan 2011 Madrid
• Chinese Consumer Involvement in Evidence-Based Medicine: Current Status and Strategies 2002 Stavanger
• Chinese doctors’ awareness of evidence-based medicine and acquisition of evidence-based practice skills: the status quo 2016 Seoul
• Chinese herb medicine for the pregnancy-induced hypertension 2004 Ottawa
• Chinese involvement in the Cochrane Collaboration 1997 Amsterdam
• Chinese involvement of EBM and Cochrane activities 2002 Stavanger
• Chinese medicinal herbs for acute bronchitis 2004 Ottawa
• Chinese medicinal herbs for Chronic Hepatitis B: A systematic review 2000 Cape Town
• Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza 2004 Ottawa
• Chinese proprietary herbal medicines for common cold — a rapid recommendation which revealed huge research waste in the field of TCM 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Chinese traditional medicine Dan Shen compound for acute myocardial infarction 2004 Ottawa
• Choice of summary statistics in Cochrane reviews 2000 Cape Town
• Choose, consider or avoid: which qualitative synthesis methods match my Cochrane Effects Review? 2018 Edinburgh
• Chronic pain: systematic review of cognitive behavioural treatments 1997 Amsterdam
• Chronically sick to chronically well: a realistic and concrete way to do things differently with evidence in the Canadian system! 2013 Québec City
• CINeMA: a web application to evaluate the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis results 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• CINeMA: a web application to evaluate the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis results 2018 Edinburgh
• Citation bias in imaging research: are studies with higher diagnostic accuracy estimates cited more often? 2018 Edinburgh
• Citation of Cochrane systematic reviews in newspapers 2020 Abstracts
• Citation patterns of Cochrane versus Non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a bibliometric analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Citation rates of Cochrane reviews versus non-Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
• Citation rates of systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension and blood pressure 2010 Keystone
• Citation screening by medical students using paper, computer, web and mobile technologies: a pilot randomised controlled trial 2012 Auckland
• Citation screening by medical students using paper, computer, web and mobile technologies: a pilot randomised controlled trial 2012 Auckland
• Citation screening in systematic reviews: two approaches, two authors and time taken (SWAR-1 (Study Within A Review 1)) 2014 Hyderabad
• Citations of Cochrane nutrition reviews in guidelines: appraising the “payback” on investment in nutrition evidence synthesis 2023 London
• Clarifying differences between review designs and methods 2012 Auckland
• Clarifying the abstracts of systematic reviews 1999 Rome
• Class 'Inclusion, Medicine and Disability' in faculties of medicine, to learn from patients and train doctors to know about diversity 2019 Santiago
• Classification criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome 1996 Adelaide
• Classification of consistency across guidelines: A model for informing patients about global guidance 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Classification of FEE studies in NHS EED according to ICD-10 category 2004 Ottawa
• Classification of methods for evaluation of treatment selection markers: A systematic review 2011 Madrid
• Classifying non-randomised studies (NRS) and assessing the risk of bias for a systematic review 2012 Auckland
• Classifying questions and matching them against forms of evidence: a new tool to better connect evidence demand and supply. 2023 London
• Classmate: A trainer’s toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Climate change adaptation, mitigation, and health policy: toward an integrated field 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Climate change and global health outcome indicators: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Climate change and infectious disease - a rapid scoping review to support public health preparedness in Canada 2019 Santiago
• Climate change impact on human migration: mapping the evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Climate change in focus: Incorporating evidence synthesis methodology into environmental decision making 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical and imaging diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis in adults: A best-practice implementation project 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical characteristics of children with COVID-19: a systematic review 2020 Abstracts
• Clinical checklist: sensitivity and specificity 2000 Cape Town
• Clinical decision support system: an effective pathway to promote shared decision making between clinician and patient. 2015 Vienna
• Clinical Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Children: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device versus Heart Transplantation in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical experts are an important resource in systematic reviews of the epidemiology of rare diseases 2018 Edinburgh
• Clinical guideline on the management of obesity in adults in primary care: the impact of patient preferences on evidence-based recommendations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical guideline review of recommendations for treating early hepatocellular carcinoma: A literature review and bibliography analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical guidelines as a source of evidence-based information about the appropriate use of OTC drugs 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical policies for optimal care: variation in content and evidence cited 2018 Edinburgh
• Clinical practice guideline evaluation with large language models: a comparative analysis using the AGREE II instrument 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical practice guideline: Dental care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa 2011 Madrid
• Clinical practice guidelines for dyslipidemia: evaluation of quality using the AGREE II and AGREE REX tools 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary arterial hypertension: evaluation of quality using the AGREE II and AGREE REX tools 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical Practice Guidelines for traditional Korean medicine (TKM) for facial palsy: an evidence-based approach 2015 Vienna
• Clinical practice guidelines in India: quality appraisal and the use of evidence in their development 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: two guideline development programs in France and Canada 1997 Amsterdam
• Clinical practice guidelines in prehospital pain management for paramedics: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical practice guidelines: An area for improvement within medical education 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical practice guidelines: how they are produced in Poland 2016 Seoul
• Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Spanish Situation 2002 Stavanger
• Clinical practice guidelinesmanuals and toolkits. Are they different among languages, countries and developers? 2013 Québec City
• Clinical Practice Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines’ Implementation in Brazil: Availability of Basic Component of Pharmaceutical Assistance’s Medicines in Federal Capitals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical research evidence of the association between depression and diabetes: A systematic literature review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical research in occupational trauma in Germany: Current status, current needs and future demands 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical studies in German health care journals: publication quality and assessment 1997 Amsterdam
• Clinical studies on depression do not address priority questions: a local basis exploration to guide research and funding in Chile. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Clinical study report use within Cochrane Reviews: recent developments within Cochrane 2019 Santiago
• Clinical teachers' attitudes towards the efficacy of evidence-based medicine workshop and self-reported ability in evidence-based practice in Iran 2005 Melbourne
• Clinical toss-ups: in defense of resource-preserving shared decision-making 2010 Keystone
• Clinical trial registries and ethics review boards: the results of a survey by the Fichtre Project 1994 Hamilton
• Clinical trial registry searching: do Cochrane protocol search methods match good practice? 2016 Seoul
• Clinical trials in perinatal-neonatal medicine: Outcome of Abstracts Submitted for Annual Conference of The American Pediatric Society and The Society for Pediatric Research - Limited to Randomized Control Trials in Neonatology 1999 Rome
• Clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine need core outcome sets 2013 Québec City
• Clinical trials publication rate in Spain: how far have we come? 2023 London
• Clinical use evidence summaries (CUES) for knowledge translation: preliminary survey of primary care clinicians on the development of focused clinical question and answer summaries based on Cochrane reviews 2010 Keystone
• Clinical utility of overviews on adverse events of pharmacological interventions 2023 London
• Clinician understanding of and attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union 2004 Ottawa
• Clinician-led and consumer engaged: clinical ethics review for healthcare quality improvement and implementation studies 2019 Santiago
• Clinician’s basic knowledge on patient safety in China 2008 Freiburg
• Clinicians need evidence that is based upon research conducted with relevant patient groups: The example of antidepressant prescribing in primary care. 2000 Cape Town
• Clinicians’ and patients’ research priorities: a scoping review 2009 Singapore
• Closing the feedback loop: Working with evidence-users to identify and share research impact on policy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Closing the gap - identifying reports of randomized trials in EMBASE for inclusion in CENTRAL 2004 Ottawa
• Closing the gap between ‘mean effect size’ and data desired by decision makers—exploring heterogeneity in complex interventions 2013 Québec City
• Closing the health equity gap: a social determinants focus for population level Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
• Closing the research-practice gap using integrated knowledge translation: a practical webinar series 2013 Québec City
• Cluster randomised trials in Cochrane reviews of infectious diseases 2009 Singapore
• Cluster randomised trials produced similar results to individually randomised trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression 2008 Freiburg
• Cluster randomised trials: a study to help recommendations for better reporting in Cochrane reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• Cluster randomized trial of an active, multifaceted information dissemination intervention based on The WHO Reproductive Health Library (RHL) to change obstetric practices 2004 Ottawa
• Clustering physical interventions in network meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
• Co-creation in developing international guidelines for the management of kidney disease 2020 Abstracts
• Co-design, co-production and acceptability of smartphone mood monitoring app for young people with bipolar disorder 2020 Abstracts
• Co-design, production, and usability testing of a communication toolbox for delivering evidence-based health information to older adults and their caregivers 2018 Edinburgh
• Co-designing outcomes for a review on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions: Are we failing our young people? 2023 London
• Co-producing a Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis: applying real-world perspectives to full-text screening 2019 Santiago
• Co-Producing a resource for intervention development: The Nature on Prescription Handbook. 2023 London
• Co-producing new quality of life and well-being questionnaires with people with dementia 2018 Edinburgh
• Co-producing with children and young people on a meta-ethnography on experiences of chronic pain, treatments and services 2023 London
• Co-production in action: improving the relevance of a Cochrane Review on person-centred care 2018 Edinburgh
• Co-production with family carers in Belfast – moving beyond the tick box! 2018 Edinburgh
• Co-publication of systematic reviews from the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• COBE: Advancing Evidence-Based Research Globally Through Collaboration and Innovation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane 'Packaging and Push' in action: dishing up digestible nutrition evidence 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane 2.0: Tweeting and blogging to disseminate child health evidence 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane activities at Tufts Medical School, Boston, USA 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Airways reviews: can they make a difference? 1998 Baltimore
• Cochrane and MAGIC breaking down silos in a digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem: results from pilot-studies on stroke, kidney diseases, musculoskeletal complaints and oral health 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane and MAGIC partnership: results from musculoskeletal pilot project on arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane and nursing: are needs being met? 2005 Melbourne
• Cochrane and Wikipedia: disseminating evidence 2014 Hyderabad
• Cochrane and World Health Organization “Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action” 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane as a knowledge commons: an institutional analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Back Group quality items and bias in back pain trials 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane Brazil Facebook: reaching people through social media 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro Affiliate’s activities and the mission of promoting Cochrane in Brazil 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Canada Live: webinars to benefit the Collaboration and beyond 2010 Keystone
• Cochrane Canada webinars: building capacity around systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
• Cochrane CENTRAL & CAFÉ (communication access framework and evidence): Locating intervention studies on clinical communication for communicatively vulnerable populations 2011 Madrid
• Cochrane CENTRAL and CAFE (Communication Access Framework and Evidence): creating a code set of factors in the ICF in interventions for both patients and providers 2012 Auckland
• Cochrane Classmate: a trainer's toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane ClassMate: a trainer’s toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Clinical Answers – content expansion priorities and subject coverage 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: a product retrospective 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: a retrospective of the past five years 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: Enabling the evidence to make a difference 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: facilitating the use of Cochrane Reviews within the clinical decision-making pathway 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: filtering the information overload for better clinical decisions 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: making the evidence matter 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Commercial Sponsorship Policy: an implementation workshop 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane Consumers and Communication: Integrating knowledge translation throughout the review cycle 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane consumers and data sharing of clinical trials - a survey; IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trials data) Observatory 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Croatia’s collaboration with partner patient/consumer organisations: use of Cochrane evidence, expectations, and opinions on data sharing 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Crowd and Classmate: new ways of working and learning together to produce health evidence 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane Crowd for all: an introduction to Cochrane Crowd's Learning Zone 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Crowd: new ways of involving consumers and patients in producing health evidence 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Crowd: using citizen science to meet the challenge of information overload in evidence production 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Crowd: Using citizen science to meet the challenge of information overload in evidence production 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Database utilization analysis: A 10 year trend of one medical center in Taiwan 2011 Madrid
• Cochrane Editors as authors: how is the potential conflict of interest managed? 2007 Sao Paulo
• Cochrane Electronic Library: Is The Giant Lost In Cyberspace? 1999 Rome
• Cochrane EPOC methods: complex interventions and non-randomised studies 2005 Melbourne
• Cochrane EPOC’s template for Qualitative Evidence Syntheses 2023 London
• Cochrane evidence and patient advocacy: a case study of a new Australian consumer organisation 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane eyes and vision group reviews and co-publications 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane Fields Knowledge Transfer Programs: evaluation of Cochrane Fields' dissemination and awareness-raising strategies for Cochrane systematic review findings 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane First Aid: a global platform for guideline developers, trainers and laypeople 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane Germany Foundation: activities directed at and in co-operation with healthcare professionals 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane goes green and gold: overview and impact of open access options for Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane highlights: disseminating Cochrane Reviews through a Brazilian international open access journal 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane HIV/AIDS reviews of high priority for the developing world 2000 Cape Town
• Cochrane in Daily Practice - using structured synopses to disseminate Cochrane evidence in Spanish 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane in Malaysia: impact of the SEA-ORCHID Project on usage of The Cochrane Library and Cochrane review activity 2009 Singapore
• Cochrane Inside: Working with a national agency to create tools for decision makers 2007 Sao Paulo
• Cochrane International Mobility (CIM): an exchange programme open to all Cochrane members and supporters 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane International Mobility Opportunity. A global exchange programme for the Cochrane Community 2023 London
• Cochrane Journal Club: Going from strength to strength? 2011 Madrid
• Cochrane Journal Club: meeting the expectations of our growing membership 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane Knowledge Translation virtual mentoring pilot scheme: what we learnt and what next? 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Kompakt: experiences from three co-ordinating entities translating Cochrane content into German 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Library Special Collections: curating evidence in response to the COVID-19 pandemic 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Living Systematic Reviews: guidance, piloting and early evaluation 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Madrid and BiblioMadSalud: an example of cooperation between Cochrane and librarians 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Methods Support Unit - How can we help? 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Nutrition & Physical Activity: embedding advocacy for conduct, communication, and use of synthesized evidence as a golden thread 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Nutrition and WHO collaborated on rapid overviews of reviews to bridge an interim guidance gap 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane overviews of reviews: purpose and quality 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane PICO ontology and linked data 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Podcasting for Dummies 2008 Freiburg
• Cochrane protocols: strategies for improving production 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane Public Health Group South Asian satellite-Public Health Evidence South Asia (PHESA): early experience 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS): training for information specialists 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane Rehabilitation Blogshot translation: a partnership model of evidence dissemination 2023 London
• Cochrane Rehabilitation collaborates with the World Health Organization to establish a Package of Rehabilitation Interventions based on the best available evidence in stroke 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Rehabilitation Field: Evidence to rehabilitation and rehabilitation expertise to Cochrane 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Rehabilitation prioritisation exercise based on an external framework reference system 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane response rapid reviews: What are they about, how to get involved and what’s in it for Cochrane groups 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane Response: Initial developments to meet rapid evidence needs 2012 Auckland
• Cochrane Review authors’ reporting of blinding in included studies: a descriptive study 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane review citation and access rates: discrepancies and implications for understanding how Cochrane reviews are used 2012 Auckland
• Cochrane Review Group Satellites - an effective way to increase review group capacity? Experiences from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group 2007 Sao Paulo
• Cochrane Review Initiative Project (CRIP) 2005 Melbourne
• Cochrane Review of interventions for improving adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals: an update 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane review of school-based interventions for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in adolescents: Why biological outcomes are important 2011 Madrid
• Cochrane reviews and evidence certainty for neglected tropical diseases 2023 London
• Cochrane Reviews and multimorbidity: past and future 2023 London
• Cochrane Reviews and the COMET Initiative. Do they consider the same outcomes for palliative care interventions? 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane Reviews are not a direct source of information for Swiss physicians 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Reviews as privileged sources to report misconduct behaviours: an informative case of duplicate publication 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Reviews in dentistry: making sense of evidence at its highest level – an analysis 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane reviews in health technology assessment reports and clinical guidelines 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane reviews in inflammatory bowel disease: experiences from a patient author 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane reviews in obstetrics and gynecology: what is the contribution of Indian studies? 2014 Hyderabad
• Cochrane reviews inform UK national policy on disinvestment from ineffective interventions 2010 Keystone
• Cochrane Reviews need to cope with the flood tide of innovations 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane reviews of complementary and alternative therapies: evaluating the strength of the evidence 2004 Ottawa
• Cochrane Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions - Improving Quality, Relevance and Utility 2002 Stavanger
• Cochrane Reviews of healthcare interventions for indigenous populations 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane reviews on Endodontics: Certainty of evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Reviews to support clinical guidelines: the opportunities and challenges of collaborating with guideline developers 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane reviews: Beyond implications for research 2011 Madrid
• Cochrane reviews: teaching critical appraisal skills 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane reviews: the impact of La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane Reviews: the linchpins of knowledge translation and impact 2014 Hyderabad
• Cochrane reviews: translations help to get evidence into practice 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane Russia capacity building: Dissemination of Cochrane evidence, improving quality and measuring performance 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Russia for trusted evidence: moving forward through the years in numbers 2023 London
• Cochrane Russia making evidence accessible and advocating for evidence 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane Russia: establishment, activities and development of a Russian-speaking Cochrane community 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane simplified Chinese translation and dissemination: a collaborative model of knowledge translation 2023 London
• Cochrane Skin Group experience with co-publication 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane SoF Tables "train the trainers" workshop 2008 Freiburg
• Cochrane South Africa training – does it work to increase knowledge and skills in evidence-based healthcare? 2023 London
• Cochrane Style Guide 2004 Ottawa
• Cochrane systematic review training for Cochrane Eyes and Vision authors 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane systematic reviews and global burden of disease in children under five: a challenge for developing countries 2007 Sao Paulo
• Cochrane systematic reviews in China 2006 Dublin
• Cochrane systematic reviews pertain to the care Of Older adults? 2000 Cape Town
• Cochrane systematic reviews: data representation beyond RevMan 1998 Baltimore
• Cochrane Targeted Updates 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Task Exchange Experience During the Coronavirus Pandemic 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Textbook of Neurology 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane Thematic Group in Heart, Stroke and Circulation: developing new international networks with a focus on multimorbidity and polyvascular disease 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane Training - facilitation skills: Creating a positive learning climate for effective learning 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane Training: facilitation skills - creating a positive learning climate for effective learning 2016 Seoul
• Cochrane UK & Ireland Trainees Advisory Group journal club – using Twitter to engage trainee’s in evidence based medicine 2020 Abstracts
• Cochrane Updating Classification System (UCS): helping readers and editors understand the status of reviews 2015 Vienna
• Cochrane versus non-Cochrane reviews: an exploration of discordance, comparative quality and relevance for patient information 2008 Freiburg
• Cochrane vignettes: use and satisfaction of Cochrane reviews in a Cochrane learning continuing medical education program 2014 Hyderabad
• Cochrane vignettes: use of Cochrane Reviews in a Cochrane learning continuing medical education program 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane web template project - what is needed? 2004 Ottawa
• Cochrane workshop: Product marketing and management 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cochrane-based decision support: global evidence at the point of care 2008 Freiburg
• Cochrane-Wikipedia 'edit-a-thon': sharing Cochrane evidence with the world 2018 Edinburgh
• Cochrane-Wikipedia Initiative: Hands-on workshop to help improve health content that people are accessing online 2023 London
• Cochrane—Wiki collaborative effort in evidence dissemination: a concept note 2012 Auckland
• Cochrane's Highly Sensitive Search Strategies and the Hedges Team Strategies for retrieving studies in systematic reviews: a pragmatic comparison 2007 Sao Paulo
• Cochrane's presence on Facebook 2014 Hyderabad
• Cochrane’s Conflict of Interest Policy Revision Project: bringing together the evidence and stakeholder perspective 2019 Santiago
• Cochrane’s impact on child health guidance in three Western countries 2013 Québec City
• Cochrane’s translation strategy: testing new support models to improve sustainability and effectiveness of translation activities 2016 Seoul
• Coding clinical trials and systematic reviews in The Cochrane Library using standard international schemas 2011 Madrid
• Coding Scheme for the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group (CCCRG) Specialised Register 2002 Stavanger
• Coerced medication in mental health care – what matters to patients? 2018 Edinburgh
• Cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention on patients with diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention on patients with diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaborating on the COVID-NMA initiative – working on a living mapping and living systematic review in a team effort 2023 London
• Collaboration across languages through the Cochrane network increases the amount of evidence 2023 London
• Collaboration among Cochrane Fields, Networks and Review Groups to optimize knowledge translation for different stakeholders and audiences 2019 Santiago
• Collaboration and agility as a strategy to guidelines development: the French experience 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaboration and flexibility in shaping a rapid review: working with government as end-user 2018 Edinburgh
• Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross-sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors 2018 Edinburgh
• Collaboration between Cochrane groups and specialty journals to improve the efficiency and quality of systematic review publication 2020 Abstracts
• Collaboration in guideline development: European Respiratory Society and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Fellowships in Guideline Methodology 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaboration In The Establishment Of A International Register Of Behavioral, Social, And Policy; Intervention Studies I HIV/AIDS Prevention 1999 Rome
• Collaboration of Cochrane Russia and Cochrane China to support evidence-based policy-making through new guideline assessment and development instruments 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaboration on Evidence Synthesis in China: A Network Study of Advancing Research Capacities 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe 1996 Adelaide
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe 1997 Amsterdam
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe 1995 Oslo
• Collaborative approaches in guideline development: a survey of organizations handbooks 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaborative efforts leading to research routes to impact 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collaborative knowledge networks (CKN) for guideline development: A Kaiser Permanente and BMJ evidence centre case study 2011 Madrid
• Collaborative priority setting in clinical research: the James Lind Alliance Neuro-Oncology Priority Setting Partnership 2015 Vienna
• Collaborative scaling of evidence-based primary care implementation in Brazil through the PACK Program: a South–South cooperation in knowledge translation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Collagenase for intervertebral-disk-herniation 2004 Ottawa