Skip to main content
Top menu
Cochrane.org
Admin
Cochrane
Colloquium Abstracts
Trusted evidence.
Informed decisions.
Better health.
Index
Analysis of the Trials on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group (CCCRG) Specialised Register
Analysis of treatment description in RCTs in physiotherapy
Analysis the status quo of using network meta-analysis in guidelines
Analytic methods to bridging the gap between randomized controlled trials and observational studies
Analytical validity of molecular techniques for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review
Analyzing the quality of clinical randomized control trial of Traditional Chinese Medicine for coronary heart disease (CHD)
Ankle brachial index to predict cardiovascular events in primary health care, a systematic review
Annotating Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions
Another decision to evaluate: choice of standardized mean difference effect size estimator
Answering clinical questions at the point of care using Cochrane evidence
Answering questions put forward by local musculoskeletal pain clinicians in the UK
Answering the call: responsive evidence generation for guideline developers
Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes (pPROM). Meta-analyses including unpublished data
Anti-TNF pivotal studies: Psoriatic patients’ nebulous data
Antibiotics versus Placebo in the Common Cold
Anticipating policy makers' needs: moving toward health intelligence at WHO/Europe
Antidepressants for the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN)
Antidepressants versus psychtherapy for the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN)
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: an updated network meta-analysis of individual participant data
Antilibidinal managements of disorders of sexual preference and those who have been convicted of sexual offences
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from Urine and Stool Samples of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Fako Division, Cameroon
Antiphospholipid syndrome – Cochrane reviews in primary and secondary prevention vs. non-Cochrane reviews and practice guidelines on similar topics
Anywhere Cochrane Reviews: responsive web design, the 'connected article' and Cochrane evidence
Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomised controlled trials. The Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example
Applicability and usability of rapid systematic reviews for rapid guidance development in health care and policy settings
Applicability of Cochrane reviews in a developing country setting- a pilot study
Applicability of R-AMSTAR instrument to appraise systematic reviews
Applicability of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for rating quality of cohort studies: using studies regarding the predictors of returning to work after traumatic limb injuries for example
Application of Bayesian methods in public health systematic reviews
Application of Case Report (CARE) guidelines in nursing Science Citation Index (SCI-index) journals
Application of diagnostic accuracy methods in a health systems context: task-shifting of diagnostic procedures
Application of evidence-based medicine to drug policy making in China
Application of GRADE 2: Making evidence-based recommendations about acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation
Application of GRADE in hematological malignancy: watchful waiting vs. immediate systemic treatment in indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma
Application of QUADAS-C and GRADE in a Cochrane DTA Review: Comparison of lipoarabinomannan assays for tuberculosis in adults living with HIV
Application of systematic review methodology to scope the development of a national nutrition policy
Application of text mining and machine learning for problem formulation in systematic reviews
Application of the GRADE method in public health: a bibliometric study of the 87 systematic reviews in Cochrane Library
Application of the GRADE methodology to Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Application of the Knowledge to Action cycle in a Public Health Setting
Applying a stepwise appraisal tool to determine the usefulness of systematic reviews in health technology assessments
Applying best-worst scaling to identify health-outcome preferences among patients with diabetes or hypertension and multiple chronic conditions
Applying CERQual to findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis on user perceptions of mHealth: discussing methodological challenges
Applying current philosophical insights on causality using Qualitative Comparative Analysis as an additional synthesis in systematic reviews to address complex interventions
Applying evidence grading methods to public health interventions
Applying framework synthesis to understand complexity in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
Applying GRADE to prognostic evidence
Applying GRADE-CERQual to interpretive review findings: Reflections from a Cochrane meta-ethnography on childhood vaccination acceptance
Applying house style to Cochrane reviews using the Cochrane Style Guide and Review Manager
Applying integrated knowledge translation framework for impactful systematic reviews: a case study about promoting rational drug use in Lebanon
Applying rapid response methods to a patient priority setting project
Applying research evidence in real life: using epidemiologists as change agents in hospitals
Applying RIGHT to evaluate guidelines of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Applying sex and gender analysis to systematic reviews: development of a new knowledge translation tool
Applying the Evidence Ecosystem concept as a tool to demonstrate the successful implementation of evidence-based practice in international aid: the example of ‘Water, Sanitation and Hygiene’ (WASH)
Applying the Evidence Ecosystem to enhance knowledge development and dissemination in an aid organization: the example of ‘Blood donation’
Applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews: inter-rater reliability and sources of discrepancy
Applying the GRADE-CERQual approach: Experiences from the development of an EPOC qualitative-evidence synthesis
Applying the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in a meta-analysis
Applying the risk of bias tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance therapy of persistent asthma
Applying the ROBINS-I tool to controlled before-and-after studies: An example from public health
Applying the Updating Classification System to Cochrane Reviews
Appraisal of search strategies in industry submissions for technology appraisal (ASSIST): Reviewing search methods of industry submissions to NICE using a structured checklist
Appraising the quality of evidence in age estimation studies: a systematic review
Approach and lessons learned from a priority-setting exercise conducted by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group
Approaches to applicability in the recent literature
Approaches to estimate and present baseline risks: Recommendations for Cochrane reviews ’Summary of findings' tables
Approaches to interim analysis of randomized clinical trials in cancer: a survey from the Italian National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials
Approaches to optimise review research recommendations when evidence is very limited: going beyond “high quality studies are needed”
Approaches to prioritisation: the Cochrane Airways Group experience
Approaches to risk of bias assessments in non-Cochrane reviews
Approaches to the identification, synthesis and appraisal of frameworks, models and theories: A methodology review
Appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analysis: large-scale survey
Archie Cochrane's Second E - the creation of Value based Healthcare
Archie training for Cochrane Review Group (CRG) editors
Are 'Risk of bias' summary graphs in Cochrane Reviews overestimating bias?
Are 3 days enough to capture the key evidence for HTA documents?
Are all Cochrane reviews born equal? Methodological quality across different Review Groups
Are all Cochrane reviews born equal? Methodological quality across different Review Groups
Are all Cochrane Reviews born equal? Statistical methods in Cochrane Reviews (could be improved)
Are Australian Human Research Ethics Committees effectively promoting prospective trial registration?
Are awaiting classification studies properly managed by Cochrane Reviews?
Are claims made in advertisements of nutritional supplements in South African women’s magazines supported by research evidence?
Are claims of interventional benefit in clinical trial abstract conclusions justifiable? A case report of pharmacological and complementary therapies for chronic asthma
Are clinician-administered semi-structured interviews and lay-administered fully structured interviews equivalent gold standards for major depression? An individual patient data meta-analysis
Are Cochrane plain language summaries plain?
Are Cochrane Review Protocols available and post-protocol changes to methods documented? A study in HIV/AIDS and ophthalmology
Are Cochrane reviews for end users of healthcare services? The results of an international survey
Are Cochrane reviews of diagnostic test accuracy informing clinical guidelines?
Are Cochrane Reviews Updated Regularly or Not?
Are Cochrane systematic reviews being used in national clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease?
Are computerized clinical decision support systems effective at improving the process of care and patient outcomes, and what makes an effective system? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
Are conference abstracts of systematic reviews reliable and well-reported? A case study of five consecutive World Congresses of Pain
Are criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of performing colonoscopy evidence based?
Are harms reported in abstracts of trial results from conference proceedings?
Are health authority policy and commissioning decisions evidence-based?
Are Health Technology Assessment (HTA) funded trials using systematic reviews to inform their design? A retrospective cohort
Are individual/small group interventions in math more effective than class/school level interventions? A meta-analysis of What Works Clearinghouse reviews
Are men difficult to find? Identifying sex-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase
Are online learning resources effective to build capacity for evidence-informed decision making?
Are overviews of (systematic) reviews really of good quality and transparent information?
Are patient-reported outcomes evaluated in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses regarding reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy?
Are Polish physicians familiar with the Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library?
Are predictions from test accuracy meta-analyses valid in practice?
Are public health strategies relevant to non-communicable disease in China covered in the Cochrane Library?
Are reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews from China lower than those from USA? A meta-epidemiological study
Are results from clinical study registers considered in recent interventional Cochrane Reviews? A systematic review
Are retracted studies affecting our reviews?
Are routinely collected data studies reliable surrogates when there are no randomized trials? A meta-epidemiological study
Are school-based mindfulness interventions effective? A Campbell systematic review and meta-analysis
Are supplementary feeding programmes to improve the health of disadvantaged young children effective? For whom and under what circumstances?
Are systematic reviews in danger of amplifying the unimportant questions? The case of dermatology
Are systematic reviews original research? - survey of editors of core clinical journals
Are test treat trials as rare as suspected? A capture-recapture estimate of numbers published
Are the estimates of blood pressure (BP) lowering effect the same in parallel and cross-over trials?
Are the integrative practices recently incorporated into the Brazilian public healthcare system supported by evidence from Cochrane Reviews?
Are the search and data extraction procedures similar between Cochrane Reviews and systematic reviews from other high impact factor journals?
Are the searches of network meta-analysis comprehensive or well-reported?
Are there differences in results between Bayesian and Frequentist network meta-analyses
Are there discipline-specific quality measures? A systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies
Are there missing randomized trials in Cochrane systematic reviews and what is their impact on the results?: A methodological study
Are they doing what it says on the packet? Towards an implementation fidelity index for use in systematic reviews
Are trial size and reported methodological quality associated with treatment effects? Observational study of 523 randomised trials
Are unpublished data searched for and included in systematic reviews? A survey of 348 reviews of adverse effects
Are volunteers authoring Cochrane reviews? A brief investigation.
Are we evaluating methodological quality in the same way? Comparison of tools used in general health research and physical therapy with the 'Risk of bias' tool
Are we listening to QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses)? An evaluation of journal-published oral health systematic reviews
Are we overestimating harm when high numbers of placebo patients are switched to active therapy as part of an adaptive trial design? A meta-epidemiological study
Are you listening? Podcasts from The Cochrane Library; a review
Are you listening? Podcasts from The Cochrane Library: a review of 2008
Are you searching the right database? An example from mental health
Area of prediction ellipse in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: Implementation in R and application to different review scenarios
Arm-based versus contrast-based methods for network meta-analyses: radical differences or misunderstood nuances?
Arriving at a bottom line for evidence quality: precision of the estimate
Artemesinin-based combination therapy for uncomplicated Malaria management among children under-5 in Cameroon: A best-practice implementation project
Artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Arthroplasty registries as a source of information for decision making: a comprehensive overview
Artificially defined transformation methods for obtaining dose points in dose-response meta-analysis should be more standardized: a cross-section study.
Ask the author? Does it make a difference to quality assessment?
Aspirin Chemoprophylaxis: Weighing the benefits and harms for patients at different levels Of risk for cardiovascular disease.
Assessing adverse effects of interventions in Cochrane reviews: what types of study designs are used?
Assessing and Addressing the Perceived Barriers to Evidence-Based Stroke Rehabilitation
Assessing and adjusting for outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews
Assessing and improving quality of reporting the estimated effect size and its precision in randomized controlled trials
Assessing and validating search strategies: When is a study truly identified?
Assessing applicability, scaling up and equity issues in Cochrane reviews: A worked example from a review of lay health worker interventions in primary and community health care for chronic conditions
Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool
Assessing bias due to confounding in a Cochrane Systematic Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
Assessing bias due to confounding in a Cochrane systematic review which includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
Assessing bias due to missing data in a systematic review that includes non-randomised studies (NRS)
Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews
Assessing bias in selection of participants into studies in a Cochrane Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
Assessing bias in selection of participants into the study in a Cochrane Systematic Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
Assessing conceptual richness in a meta-ethnography: an example from a qualitative evidence synthesis on factors influencing acceptance of childhood vaccination
Assessing confidence in qualitative evidence used in guidelines: Benefits and challenges when applying GRADE-CERQual
Assessing equity, applicability and scaling up issues in Cochrane reviews: a worked example from a review of lay health worker interventions in primary and community health care
Assessing ethics and equity issues in systematic reviews and primary studies of nutrition interventions
Assessing generalizability of findings in systematic reviews of public health interventions: methods of the US Community Preventive Services Task Force
Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum
Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum: a proposal
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policymakers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
Assessing how much certainty to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: the CerQual approach
Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the CERQual tool
Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the GRADE-CERQual approach
Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the GRADE-CERQual tool
Assessing how well interventions for migrant population have addressed inequity: a two-stage systematic review
Assessing implementation in complex interventions: tips, strategies and examples
Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
Assessing Leg Ulcer Prevalence Studies: Conceptual, Methodological and Practical Issues
Assessing methodological quality in a large research literature: the case of distance education comparison studies
Assessing methodological quality of primary studies and applying results in the cochrane reviews. An evaluation of the drugs and alcohol group s reviews.
Assessing publication bias in systematic reviews andmeta-analyses in the context of small n trials: application of a capture-recapture method
Assessing quality in systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health promotion and public health: areas of consensus and dissension
Assessing risk of bias (RoB) in randomized trials: RoB 2.0
Assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies using QUADAS-C
Assessing risk of bias in included studies: the recommended tool for Cochrane reviews
Assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies and incorporating GRADE: Initial experience with a new Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool under development
Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (1): introduction to the ROBINS-I tool
Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions 2: an online tool to facilitate risk of bias assessments using the ROBINS-I tool
Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions: introduction to the ROBINS-I tool
Assessing risk of bias in randomised studies: RoB 2.0
Assessing risk of bias in randomized trials: RoB 2
Assessing risk of bias: comparison of the PEDro scale with Cochrane’s ‘Risk of bias’ tool
Assessing risk of lead-time bias in studies of overdiagnosis
Assessing risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a single domain is less accurate compared to assessment of two separate domains
Assessing spin bias in abstracts of systematic reviews from Revista médica de Chile between 2017-2021
Assessing the Accuracy, Reliability and Quality of Online Health Information of Treatment for Patients With COVID-19
Assessing the body of evidence and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy
Assessing the certainty of evidence in overviews of reviews: current practice and expert perspectives
Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
Assessing the certainty of the evidence in network meta-analysis: GRADE approach
Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food availability
Assessing the completeness of systematic reviews via the 'related articles' function and/or a simple structured Boolean search in PubMed,-,a pilot study
Assessing the effect of adjusting for funnel plot asymmetry in networks of interventions
Assessing the effects of diagnostic tests on patient outcomes: how reliable, informative and practical are randomised controlled trials?
Assessing the efficacy of anti-depressant treatment: methodological considerations for meta-analysis
Assessing the feasibility of network meta-analyses comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for psychiatric disorders
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
3
Page
4
Current page
5
Page
6
Page
7
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Main navigation
Search
About