• Analysis of the Trials on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group (CCCRG) Specialised Register
• Analysis of treatment description in RCTs in physiotherapy
• Analysis the status quo of using network meta-analysis in guidelines
• Analytic methods to bridging the gap between randomized controlled trials and observational studies
• Analytical validity of molecular techniques for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review
• Analyzing the quality of clinical randomized control trial of Traditional Chinese Medicine for coronary heart disease (CHD)
• Ankle brachial index to predict cardiovascular events in primary health care, a systematic review
• Annotating Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions
• Another decision to evaluate: choice of standardized mean difference effect size estimator
• Answering clinical questions at the point of care using Cochrane evidence
• Answering questions put forward by local musculoskeletal pain clinicians in the UK
• Answering the call: responsive evidence generation for guideline developers
• Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes (pPROM). Meta-analyses including unpublished data
• Anti-TNF pivotal studies: Psoriatic patients’ nebulous data
• Antibiotics versus Placebo in the Common Cold
• Anticipating policy makers' needs: moving toward health intelligence at WHO/Europe
• Antidepressants for the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN)
• Antidepressants versus psychtherapy for the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN)
• Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: an updated network meta-analysis of individual participant data
• Antilibidinal managements of disorders of sexual preference and those who have been convicted of sexual offences
• Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from Urine and Stool Samples of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Fako Division, Cameroon
• Antiphospholipid syndrome – Cochrane reviews in primary and secondary prevention vs. non-Cochrane reviews and practice guidelines on similar topics
• Anywhere Cochrane Reviews: responsive web design, the 'connected article' and Cochrane evidence
• Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomised controlled trials. The Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example
• Applicability and usability of rapid systematic reviews for rapid guidance development in health care and policy settings
• Applicability of Cochrane reviews in a developing country setting- a pilot study
• Applicability of R-AMSTAR instrument to appraise systematic reviews
• Applicability of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for rating quality of cohort studies: using studies regarding the predictors of returning to work after traumatic limb injuries for example
• Application of Bayesian methods in public health systematic reviews
• Application of Case Report (CARE) guidelines in nursing Science Citation Index (SCI-index) journals
• Application of diagnostic accuracy methods in a health systems context: task-shifting of diagnostic procedures
• Application of evidence-based medicine to drug policy making in China
• Application of GRADE 2: Making evidence-based recommendations about acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation
• Application of GRADE in hematological malignancy: watchful waiting vs. immediate systemic treatment in indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma
• Application of QUADAS-C and GRADE in a Cochrane DTA Review: Comparison of lipoarabinomannan assays for tuberculosis in adults living with HIV
• Application of systematic review methodology to scope the development of a national nutrition policy
• Application of text mining and machine learning for problem formulation in systematic reviews
• Application of the GRADE method in public health: a bibliometric study of the 87 systematic reviews in Cochrane Library
• Application of the GRADE methodology to Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
• Application of the Knowledge to Action cycle in a Public Health Setting
• Applying a stepwise appraisal tool to determine the usefulness of systematic reviews in health technology assessments
• Applying best-worst scaling to identify health-outcome preferences among patients with diabetes or hypertension and multiple chronic conditions
• Applying CERQual to findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis on user perceptions of mHealth: discussing methodological challenges
• Applying current philosophical insights on causality using Qualitative Comparative Analysis as an additional synthesis in systematic reviews to address complex interventions
• Applying evidence grading methods to public health interventions
• Applying framework synthesis to understand complexity in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
• Applying GRADE to prognostic evidence
• Applying GRADE-CERQual to interpretive review findings: Reflections from a Cochrane meta-ethnography on childhood vaccination acceptance
• Applying house style to Cochrane reviews using the Cochrane Style Guide and Review Manager
• Applying integrated knowledge translation framework for impactful systematic reviews: a case study about promoting rational drug use in Lebanon
• Applying rapid response methods to a patient priority setting project
• Applying research evidence in real life: using epidemiologists as change agents in hospitals
• Applying RIGHT to evaluate guidelines of Traditional Chinese Medicine
• Applying sex and gender analysis to systematic reviews: development of a new knowledge translation tool
• Applying the Evidence Ecosystem concept as a tool to demonstrate the successful implementation of evidence-based practice in international aid: the example of ‘Water, Sanitation and Hygiene’ (WASH)
• Applying the Evidence Ecosystem to enhance knowledge development and dissemination in an aid organization: the example of ‘Blood donation’
• Applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews: inter-rater reliability and sources of discrepancy
• Applying the GRADE-CERQual approach: Experiences from the development of an EPOC qualitative-evidence synthesis
• Applying the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in a meta-analysis
• Applying the risk of bias tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance therapy of persistent asthma
• Applying the ROBINS-I tool to controlled before-and-after studies: An example from public health
• Applying the Updating Classification System to Cochrane Reviews
• Appraisal of search strategies in industry submissions for technology appraisal (ASSIST): Reviewing search methods of industry submissions to NICE using a structured checklist
• Appraising the quality of evidence in age estimation studies: a systematic review
• Approach and lessons learned from a priority-setting exercise conducted by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group
• Approaches to applicability in the recent literature
• Approaches to estimate and present baseline risks: Recommendations for Cochrane reviews ’Summary of findings' tables
• Approaches to interim analysis of randomized clinical trials in cancer: a survey from the Italian National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials
• Approaches to optimise review research recommendations when evidence is very limited: going beyond “high quality studies are needed”
• Approaches to prioritisation: the Cochrane Airways Group experience
• Approaches to risk of bias assessments in non-Cochrane reviews
• Approaches to the identification, synthesis and appraisal of frameworks, models and theories: A methodology review
• Appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analysis: large-scale survey
• Archie Cochrane's Second E - the creation of Value based Healthcare
• Archie training for Cochrane Review Group (CRG) editors
• Are 'Risk of bias' summary graphs in Cochrane Reviews overestimating bias?
• Are 3 days enough to capture the key evidence for HTA documents?
• Are all Cochrane reviews born equal? Methodological quality across different Review Groups
• Are all Cochrane reviews born equal? Methodological quality across different Review Groups
• Are all Cochrane Reviews born equal? Statistical methods in Cochrane Reviews (could be improved)
• Are Australian Human Research Ethics Committees effectively promoting prospective trial registration?
• Are awaiting classification studies properly managed by Cochrane Reviews?
• Are claims made in advertisements of nutritional supplements in South African women’s magazines supported by research evidence?
• Are claims of interventional benefit in clinical trial abstract conclusions justifiable? A case report of pharmacological and complementary therapies for chronic asthma
• Are clinician-administered semi-structured interviews and lay-administered fully structured interviews equivalent gold standards for major depression? An individual patient data meta-analysis
• Are Cochrane plain language summaries plain?
• Are Cochrane Review Protocols available and post-protocol changes to methods documented? A study in HIV/AIDS and ophthalmology
• Are Cochrane reviews for end users of healthcare services? The results of an international survey
• Are Cochrane reviews of diagnostic test accuracy informing clinical guidelines?
• Are Cochrane Reviews Updated Regularly or Not?
• Are Cochrane systematic reviews being used in national clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease?
• Are computerized clinical decision support systems effective at improving the process of care and patient outcomes, and what makes an effective system? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
• Are conference abstracts of systematic reviews reliable and well-reported? A case study of five consecutive World Congresses of Pain
• Are criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of performing colonoscopy evidence based?
• Are harms reported in abstracts of trial results from conference proceedings?
• Are health authority policy and commissioning decisions evidence-based?
• Are Health Technology Assessment (HTA) funded trials using systematic reviews to inform their design? A retrospective cohort
• Are individual/small group interventions in math more effective than class/school level interventions? A meta-analysis of What Works Clearinghouse reviews
• Are men difficult to find? Identifying sex-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase
• Are online learning resources effective to build capacity for evidence-informed decision making?
• Are overviews of (systematic) reviews really of good quality and transparent information?
• Are patient-reported outcomes evaluated in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses regarding reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy?
• Are Polish physicians familiar with the Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library?
• Are predictions from test accuracy meta-analyses valid in practice?
• Are public health strategies relevant to non-communicable disease in China covered in the Cochrane Library?
• Are reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews from China lower than those from USA? A meta-epidemiological study
• Are results from clinical study registers considered in recent interventional Cochrane Reviews? A systematic review
• Are retracted studies affecting our reviews?
• Are routinely collected data studies reliable surrogates when there are no randomized trials? A meta-epidemiological study
• Are school-based mindfulness interventions effective? A Campbell systematic review and meta-analysis
• Are supplementary feeding programmes to improve the health of disadvantaged young children effective? For whom and under what circumstances?
• Are systematic reviews in danger of amplifying the unimportant questions? The case of dermatology
• Are systematic reviews original research? - survey of editors of core clinical journals
• Are test treat trials as rare as suspected? A capture-recapture estimate of numbers published
• Are the estimates of blood pressure (BP) lowering effect the same in parallel and cross-over trials?
• Are the integrative practices recently incorporated into the Brazilian public healthcare system supported by evidence from Cochrane Reviews?
• Are the search and data extraction procedures similar between Cochrane Reviews and systematic reviews from other high impact factor journals?
• Are the searches of network meta-analysis comprehensive or well-reported?
• Are there differences in results between Bayesian and Frequentist network meta-analyses
• Are there discipline-specific quality measures? A systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies
• Are there missing randomized trials in Cochrane systematic reviews and what is their impact on the results?: A methodological study
• Are they doing what it says on the packet? Towards an implementation fidelity index for use in systematic reviews
• Are trial size and reported methodological quality associated with treatment effects? Observational study of 523 randomised trials
• Are unpublished data searched for and included in systematic reviews? A survey of 348 reviews of adverse effects
• Are volunteers authoring Cochrane reviews? A brief investigation.
• Are we evaluating methodological quality in the same way? Comparison of tools used in general health research and physical therapy with the 'Risk of bias' tool
• Are we listening to QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses)? An evaluation of journal-published oral health systematic reviews
• Are we overestimating harm when high numbers of placebo patients are switched to active therapy as part of an adaptive trial design? A meta-epidemiological study
• Are you listening? Podcasts from The Cochrane Library; a review
• Are you listening? Podcasts from The Cochrane Library: a review of 2008
• Are you searching the right database? An example from mental health
• Area of prediction ellipse in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: Implementation in R and application to different review scenarios
• Arm-based versus contrast-based methods for network meta-analyses: radical differences or misunderstood nuances?
• Arriving at a bottom line for evidence quality: precision of the estimate
• Artemesinin-based combination therapy for uncomplicated Malaria management among children under-5 in Cameroon: A best-practice implementation project
• Artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Arthroplasty registries as a source of information for decision making: a comprehensive overview
• Artificially defined transformation methods for obtaining dose points in dose-response meta-analysis should be more standardized: a cross-section study.
• Ask the author? Does it make a difference to quality assessment?
• Aspirin Chemoprophylaxis: Weighing the benefits and harms for patients at different levels Of risk for cardiovascular disease.
• Assessing adverse effects of interventions in Cochrane reviews: what types of study designs are used?
• Assessing and Addressing the Perceived Barriers to Evidence-Based Stroke Rehabilitation
• Assessing and adjusting for outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews
• Assessing and improving quality of reporting the estimated effect size and its precision in randomized controlled trials
• Assessing and validating search strategies: When is a study truly identified?
• Assessing applicability, scaling up and equity issues in Cochrane reviews: A worked example from a review of lay health worker interventions in primary and community health care for chronic conditions
• Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool
• Assessing bias due to confounding in a Cochrane Systematic Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
• Assessing bias due to confounding in a Cochrane systematic review which includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
• Assessing bias due to missing data in a systematic review that includes non-randomised studies (NRS)
• Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews
• Assessing bias in selection of participants into studies in a Cochrane Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
• Assessing bias in selection of participants into the study in a Cochrane Systematic Review that includes non-randomised studies of an intervention (NRSI)
• Assessing conceptual richness in a meta-ethnography: an example from a qualitative evidence synthesis on factors influencing acceptance of childhood vaccination
• Assessing confidence in qualitative evidence used in guidelines: Benefits and challenges when applying GRADE-CERQual
• Assessing equity, applicability and scaling up issues in Cochrane reviews: a worked example from a review of lay health worker interventions in primary and community health care
• Assessing ethics and equity issues in systematic reviews and primary studies of nutrition interventions
• Assessing generalizability of findings in systematic reviews of public health interventions: methods of the US Community Preventive Services Task Force
• Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum
• Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum: a proposal
• Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policymakers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
• Assessing how much certainty to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: the CerQual approach
• Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the CERQual tool
• Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the GRADE-CERQual approach
• Assessing how much confidence to place in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: a new version of the GRADE-CERQual tool
• Assessing how well interventions for migrant population have addressed inequity: a two-stage systematic review
• Assessing implementation in complex interventions: tips, strategies and examples
• Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
• Assessing Leg Ulcer Prevalence Studies: Conceptual, Methodological and Practical Issues
• Assessing methodological quality in a large research literature: the case of distance education comparison studies
• Assessing methodological quality of primary studies and applying results in the cochrane reviews. An evaluation of the drugs and alcohol group s reviews.
• Assessing publication bias in systematic reviews andmeta-analyses in the context of small n trials: application of a capture-recapture method
• Assessing quality in systematic reviews of the effective­ness of health promotion and public health: areas of consensus and dissension
• Assessing risk of bias (RoB) in randomized trials: RoB 2.0
• Assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies using QUADAS-C
• Assessing risk of bias in included studies: the recommended tool for Cochrane reviews
• Assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies and incorporating GRADE: Initial experience with a new Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool under development
• Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (1): introduction to the ROBINS-I tool
• Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions 2: an online tool to facilitate risk of bias assessments using the ROBINS-I tool
• Assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions: introduction to the ROBINS-I tool
• Assessing risk of bias in randomised studies: RoB 2.0
• Assessing risk of bias in randomized trials: RoB 2
• Assessing risk of bias: comparison of the PEDro scale with Cochrane’s ‘Risk of bias’ tool
• Assessing risk of lead-time bias in studies of overdiagnosis
• Assessing risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a single domain is less accurate compared to assessment of two separate domains
• Assessing spin bias in abstracts of systematic reviews from Revista médica de Chile between 2017-2021
• Assessing the Accuracy, Reliability and Quality of Online Health Information of Treatment for Patients With COVID-19
• Assessing the body of evidence and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
• Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy
• Assessing the certainty of evidence in overviews of reviews: current practice and expert perspectives
• Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
• Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
• Assessing the certainty of the evidence from network-meta analysis using the GRADE approach
• Assessing the certainty of the evidence in network meta-analysis: GRADE approach
• Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food availability
• Assessing the completeness of systematic reviews via the 'related articles' function and/or a simple structured Boolean search in PubMed,-,a pilot study
• Assessing the effect of adjusting for funnel plot asymmetry in networks of interventions
• Assessing the effects of diagnostic tests on patient outcomes: how reliable, informative and practical are randomised controlled trials?
• Assessing the efficacy of anti-depressant treatment: methodological considerations for meta-analysis
• Assessing the feasibility of network meta-analyses comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for psychiatric disorders