• Bibliographic analysis of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group's reviews
• Bibliometric analyses along cumulative meta-analyses: the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE)
• Bibliometric analysis of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ from 2000 to 2018
• Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Big vs. Small data: Opportunities in new data sources for evidence generation
• Biomedical databases: selection and searching for trials to conduct systematic reviews for Chinese reviewers
• Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery
• Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values
• Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic reviews
• Bivariate network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies synthesising multiple tests and multiple thresholds
• Blinded assessment of the methodological quality
• Blinding in randomised controlled trials of surgical procedures in children: who, when and how
• Blood pressure increasing effect of sibutramine in obese patients
• Blood pressure variability; lessons learned from a systematic review
• Blood Pressure-Lowering Efficacy: A Family of Systematic Reviews of Different Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs
• Blood transfusions for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease
• Blood-donor eligibility in Belgian Red Cross’ Blood Service: from systematic reviews to impact on policy level
• Boosting global and local partnerships to promote equitable access of COVID-19 guideline recommendations: case study in China
• Bradford’s law to predict the size of the literature in cochrane reviews
• Brain metastasis management: difficulties with integrating Cochrane Review evidence into guidelines
• Brazil’s growing production of scientific review articles
• Brazilian Cochrane as MD, PhD program training center
• Brazilian Cochrane Center strategies for disseminating the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews
• Brazilian guideline for diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease
• Brazilian guidelines for the management of adult potential brain-dead donors
• Brazilian oral health journals in Scielo: an open access tropical treasure?
• Breadth and depth of review questions: mixed methods, mapping, reviews of reviews and other methods for enabling analysis of broad questions and heterogeneous data
• Breaking Ground or Breaking Bad? Examining the Fate of Preprints in Prevention Research with a Mixed Methods Study
• Breast cancer screening: effective and efficient as well as efficacious
• Breast cancer screening: effective and efficient as well as efficacious
• Breastfeeding on health: a Living Overview of the Evidence (L-OVE)
• Breastfeeding support and avoiding inappropriate breastmilk substitutes marketing in a neonatal ward in the Czech Republic
• Bridging clinical investigators and statisticians: publication status and problems of Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
• Bridging evidence and practice: the experience of GESI Network members in engaging stakeholders
• Bridging gaps between Chinese reviewers and Cochrane review groups
• Bridging the gap between research results and decision making in clinical
  practice: common problems in the development and use of a national Electronic
  Library of Health Care
• Bridging the gap between science and policy at the agri-food and public health interface through a knowledge synthesis, transfer and exchange handbook
• Bridging the gap from research to practice: the emergence of a community of practice in EBM at the department of family medicine at Laval university
• Bridging the gaps across the income divide: A review of The Collaboration's efforts to date and recommendations for the future
• Bridging the gaps between evidence-based and experience-based medicine in a Swiss Cochrane Symposium
• Bridging the gaps between prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling
• Bridging the information gap in Saskatchewan: Accessing and using The Cochrane Library province-wide
• Bringing a patient perspective to understanding interventions that aim to reduce length of stay in hospital: a mixed methods synthesis
• Bringing a systematic element to complex focussed literature reviews
• Bringing best evidence to front line clinicians
• Bringing Cochrane reviews to Polish professionals and consumers
• Bringing evidence into practice: Use of a rapid review methodology to formulate medical recommendations for the Red Cross Blood Service
• Bringing GRADEpro to Health Technology Assessment: a pilot study to improve quality and transparency of Scoping and Project Plan in EUnetHTA
• Bringing Narrative Evidence 'into the Fold': Methods for Generalizing from Individual Narrative Data
• Bringing policy makers closer to systematic reviews: Brazilian strategies
• Bringing the culture of Cochrane to a professional medical association
• Broad versus narrow questions: empirical evidence of lumping and splitting of topics in Cochrane Perinatal Reviews
• Budget impact of including short-acting insulin analogues in the public-health system of an upper-middle income country
• Building a clean and comprehensive study-based register of reports of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• Building a Crowd community of 'citizen scientists' in the US through engagement and strategic partnerships
• Building a database of respiratory guidelines: why, how, and what for?
• Building a database of systematic reviews about patient safety: providing clinicians with easier access to evidence
• Building a database of validated pediatric outcomes
• Building a database of validated pediatric outcomes: an investigation of compliance with established reporting standards
• Building a diverse community: new ways to participate in Cochrane
• Building a nationwide online platform for evidence-based information in primary healthcare in Belgium
• Building a research team: A Cochrane US Network experience focusing on racial health equity
• Building a specialized register of behavioral medicine interventions
• Building a systematic review movement in the humanitarian field
• Building acceptance for machine learning in study selection within a systematic review institution: Experiences from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health
• Building actionable knowledge from referential knowledge for evidence-based nursing practice
• Building awareness for evidence-based practice in Malaysia
• Building bridges between systematic reviews and Brazilian decision-making: methods for disseminating evidence
• Building capacity for Cochrane activity in South East Asia: impact of the SEA-ORCHID Project
• Building capacity for systematic reviews in low-income countries beyond the classroom: the Africa centre for systematic reviews and knowledge translation
• Building capacity for systematic reviews in low-income countries: the Africa centre for systematic reviews and knowledge translation
• Building capacity in EBHC: What is happening in the African region?
• Building capacity in producing trusted evidence – Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland Fellowships
• Building Capacity of Indian Scientists in Conduct of Systematic Reviews: an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Initiative
• Building capacity to support evidence-informed public health: an innovative knowledge broker mentoring program
• Building capacity with Cochrane webinars: tips and tricks for presenters
• Building evidence utilisation capacity of health policy makers at the Federal Ministry of Health in Ethiopian: Mentor – mentee experience
• Building evidence-based public health capacity in Africa: developing and piloting a workshop
• Building more robust search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews: towards improving inter-information specialists’ agreement
• Building national implementation strategies for chronic diseases guidelines in primary health care setting: results from Korean primary care physicians’ baseline survey
• Building Partnerships Across the Systematic Review Community in the United States: Efforts by the AHRQ EPC Program
• Building partnerships with the public by learning about Cochrane evidence
• Building the evidence base for children’s and family support services using practice-based evidence
• Building the research capacity of medical officers of the Government of Nepal in health-system research
• Building up a disease-specific trials register in hemato-oncology: experiences from a project of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG)
• Bunches of evidence: displaying 'Summary of findings' tables visually as ‘evidence flowers’
• Burden of brain tumours in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review protocol
• But is it relevant? Applying the results of Cochrane Reviews to high-risk and disadvantaged populations.
• By how much does publication bias affect the results of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• C.H.A.I.N. Canada - Contact, Help, Advice & Information, Network: linking professions, organisations, researchers, practitioners and policy makers
• CADIMA: An Open Access online tool supporting the reporting and conduct of systematic reviews and systematic maps
• CADTH's Health Technology Inquiry Service: providing relevant and timely evidence for Canadian health care decision makers
• Café Scientifique—public outreach
• Calcium antagonists in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): a meta-analysis
• Calcium Antagonists Risk-Benefit and Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes: Review of Literature and Drug Utilization Profile
• Calculating confidence intervals for a net-effect estimate
• Calculating confidence intervals for the absolute risk reduction taking uncertainties of relative risk and baseline risk estimates into account
• Calculating costs: facing challenges for a cost comparison of day surgical and inpatient varicose vein surgery as an example
• Calculating standardised mean differences from cluster randomised trials using published sources
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT)
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT)
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/H)
• Calculation of absolute risk for important outcomes in patients with and without a prognostic factor of interest
• Calculation of Numbers Needed to Treat from Systematic Reviews. Point estimate and Confidence Intervals compared using six different methods.
• Calculation of variance of treatment effects when these are not reported for all arms of trials with more than two arms
• Can American Indian and Alaska Native populations ever have a sufficient research base for best practices?
• Can an evidence-informed taxonomy be used to map vaccination communication interventions in ‘real world’ settings? Findings from Nigeria
• Can analysis of the effect of social disadvantage on health outcomes be improved through the use of causal pathways?
• Can artificial intelligence learn to identify systematic reviews on the effectiveness of public health interventions?
• Can assessors in a trial of psychotherapy be successfully blinded?
• Can brief interventions reduce alcohol consumption in drinkers at risk of alcohol related harm? A meta-analysis of clinical trials
• Can Cinderalla's sisters make it to the ball? Summary reviews/overviews within revMan 4.1.
• Can Cochrane's machine learning classifier increase the efficiency of guideline production?
• Can consumers improve the quality of Cochrane reviews?
• Can data extraction from figures perform a meta-analysis?
• Can diagnostic filters offer similar sensitivity and a reduced number needed to read compared to searches based on index test and target condition?
• Can English-speaking reviewers correctly identify foreignlanguage articles that meet eligibility criteria for a systematic review of management for fibromyalgia?
• Can evidence-based journal clubs promote knowledge translation in real-world clinical settings?
• Can exercise prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women? Meta-analysis of (R) CT's on the effects of endurance and strength training on bone mass
• Can generalizability be considered in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• Can Indirect comparisons be improved using individual patient data?
• Can Qualitative Comparative Analysis help us to identify important components of complex interventions?
• Can rapid-learning health systems accommodate individual participant data (IPD)? An example of the timelines involved in an IPD meta-analysis
• Can summarising trials of public health strategies by camparator design improve interpretation?
• Can systematic reviewing be adapted for hypothesis testing in medicine and biology?
• Can systematic reviews provide the evidence needed for making regulatory decisions? An FDA's statistician's perspective
• Can the Cochrane RCT classifier be used to speed up screening for a qualitative evidence synthesis? A retrospective evaluation
• Can the impact of an erroneous review be corrected?
• Can trial quality be reliably assessed from a trial publication?
• Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
• Can we make patient versions of guidelines more applicable to patients and the public?
• Can we reduce the workload of systematic reviews without compromising quality? A new platform to accelerate search and study identification
• Can we trust patient reported outcomes in the absence of blinding? Preliminary results from an analysis of trials included in systematic reviews of interventions for chronic conditions
• Can we trust the conclusion in peer-review publications? A review of quality improvement intervention studies
• Can we trust what we read on reviews abstracts of interventions for low back pain? A methodological review
• Can we use GRADE to create new diagnostic criteria for a condition? An application of GRADE principles for establishing diagnostic criteria for a disease
• Can we use non-research papers in systematic reviews to assess organisational processes? Lessons from a review on immunization advisory committees
• Can we use overviews to reduce research waste? An example from a population-level intervention overview
• Can we use results from a broader study population for conclusions about the treatment effect in a subpopulation of interest?
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Education and Training Project 2004-05
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Partners Forum: strengthening partnerships to increase evidence-based decision-making
• Canadian practitioners’ opioid-related treatment practices: A scoping review
• Capacity building and health system strengthening through Cochrane sensitization and training in the Caribbean
• Capacity building for evidence-based child health through digital platforms
• Capacity building in conducting systematic reviews
• Capacity building in Evidence Based Child Health: six years’ experience
• Capacity building in systematic reviews in South Asia: a South-North collaboration to expand the production and translation of synthesized evidence
• Capacity building to produce useful evidence: Who sets the agenda?
• Capacity-sharing for improved filtering of information for decision-making in the African context
• Capturing the broader impact of research and innovation: Outcome mapping in a product research and development project
• Capturing the primary outcome for Cochrane reviews of deprescribing specific medications: an overview of Cochrane reviews
• Caregiver-provided and home-based individual cognitive stimulation: the cultural adaptation process guided by the systematic review method and community involvement approach
• Carnival time: a mapping exercise of Brazilian oral health journals
• Case report of a satellite effort: The Denver Satellite of the Cochrane Skin Group
• Case study on comprehensive searching in the area of overcrowding in emergency departments
• Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies
• Categorising continuous risk factors: issues and implications
• Categorizing conflicts of interest in healthcare research: a proposed framework
• Cats and dogs – a training example for GRADE
• Causal chain analysis as a way of understanding how interventions work
• Causal mapping for systematic reviews of complex social intervention
• Causal modelling in RCTs: how results compare to ITT and other analytical methods – a meta-epidemiological analysis
• Caveats in the meta-analysis of continuous data: a simulation study
• CBRG QuickDecks: a new tool for sharing the best evidence in back and neck pain care
• Celebrity Deathmatch: Burden of disease vs. RCTs in the Southern cone of Latin America
• CENTRAL Cleanup and HarmoniSR
• CENTRAL HELLIS: searching for the lost trials of South-East Asia
• Centralised Cochrane review updating: the experience of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group
• Centre of Health Technology Assessment of Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Using EBM to qualify and promote the sustainability of Brazilian public health system (SUS)
• CEOsys – An ecosystem for COVID-19 evidence in Germany: challenges and lessons learned as a guide for future networks
• Certainty of evidence and level of recommendation for complex versus simple interventions in Chilean clinical guidelines.
• Certainty of evidence from Cochrane Reviews on Neonatal Sepsis
• Certainty of evidence in Summary of Findings Tables from Cochrane network meta-analyses
• Certainty of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
• Certainty of net benefit: A concept between quality of evidence and strength of recommendation
• Cervical Cancer And Sexual Lifestyle : A Systematic Review of Health Education Interventions
• Challenge and strategy of developing country participating in Cochrane collaboration - experience of Chinese Cochrane center
• Challenges and Achievements of Implementing Evidence-Based Psychology in Brazil
• Challenges and considerations in assessing the reporting quality of systematic reviews in overviews using PRISMA
• Challenges and considerations involved in using AMSTAR in overviews of reviews
• Challenges and facilitators for early career researchers completing systematic or scoping reviews in the health sciences: a scoping review
• Challenges and innovations in evidence synthesis and evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic
• Challenges and inspirations in disseminating clinical evidence on Traditional Chinese Medicine: 10 years' experiences from volunteers
• Challenges and opportunities for utilizing systematic reviews in zoonotic public health
• Challenges and opportunities in developing a web-based systematic review data repository
• Challenges and opportunities of Evidence-Based Research in rapid learning health systems
• Challenges and potential solutions for reporting findings from multicomponent meta-regression models in GRADE summary of findings tables
• Challenges and promises of cultural adaption of the Claim Evaluation Tools – an on-going process of validation in Poland
• Challenges and solutions when carrying out mixed methods literature reviews in resource constrained settings
• Challenges and strategies of increasing production of Cochrane reviews in China
• Challenges associated with assessing co-dependent (‘test and treat’) technologies
• Challenges conducting a Cochrane Review of public health ‘implementation strategies’
• Challenges faced and lessons learned from doing overviews of systematic reviews of complex interventions
• Challenges facing reviewers preparing overviews of reviews
• Challenges for conducting overviews including observational primary studies
• Challenges for conducting rapid reviews for health policy and guideline development
• Challenges for evidence-based decision making in Korea
• Challenges for formulary recommendations: limita­tions of outcome data reported in systematic reviews
• Challenges in applying GRADE to health systems and public health interventions
• Challenges in applying PLS guidance for diagnostic test accuracy reviews