• Cochrane Electronic Library: Is The Giant Lost In Cyberspace?
• Cochrane EPOC methods: complex interventions and non-randomised studies
• Cochrane EPOC’s template for Qualitative Evidence Syntheses
• Cochrane evidence and patient advocacy: a case study of a new Australian consumer organisation
• Cochrane eyes and vision group reviews and co-publications
• Cochrane Fields Knowledge Transfer Programs: evaluation of Cochrane Fields' dissemination and awareness-raising strategies for Cochrane systematic review findings
• Cochrane First Aid: a global platform for guideline developers, trainers and laypeople
• Cochrane Germany Foundation: activities directed at and in co-operation with healthcare professionals
• Cochrane goes green and gold: overview and impact of open access options for Cochrane Reviews
• Cochrane highlights: disseminating Cochrane Reviews through a Brazilian international open access journal
• Cochrane HIV/AIDS reviews of high priority for the developing world
• Cochrane in Daily Practice - using structured synopses to disseminate Cochrane evidence in Spanish
• Cochrane in Malaysia: impact of the SEA-ORCHID Project on usage of The Cochrane Library and Cochrane review activity
• Cochrane Inside: Working with a national agency to create tools for decision makers
• Cochrane International Mobility (CIM): an exchange programme open to all Cochrane members and supporters
• Cochrane International Mobility Opportunity. A global exchange programme for the Cochrane Community
• Cochrane Journal Club: Going from strength to strength?
• Cochrane Journal Club: meeting the expectations of our growing membership
• Cochrane Knowledge Translation virtual mentoring pilot scheme: what we learnt and what next?
• Cochrane Kompakt: experiences from three co-ordinating entities translating Cochrane content into German
• Cochrane Library Special Collections: curating evidence in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
• Cochrane Living Systematic Reviews: guidance, piloting and early evaluation
• Cochrane Madrid and BiblioMadSalud: an example of cooperation between Cochrane and librarians
• Cochrane Methods Support Unit - How can we help?
• Cochrane overviews of reviews: purpose and quality
• Cochrane PICO ontology and linked data
• Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards
• Cochrane Podcasting for Dummies
• Cochrane protocols: strategies for improving production
• Cochrane Public Health Group South Asian satellite-Public Health Evidence South Asia (PHESA): early experience
• Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS): training for information specialists
• Cochrane Rehabilitation Blogshot translation: a partnership model of evidence dissemination
• Cochrane Rehabilitation collaborates with the World Health Organization to establish a Package of Rehabilitation Interventions based on the best available evidence in stroke
• Cochrane Rehabilitation Field: Evidence to rehabilitation and rehabilitation expertise to Cochrane
• Cochrane Rehabilitation prioritisation exercise based on an external framework reference system
• Cochrane response rapid reviews: What are they about, how to get involved and what’s in it for Cochrane groups
• Cochrane Response: Initial developments to meet rapid evidence needs
• Cochrane Review authors’ reporting of blinding in included studies: a descriptive study
• Cochrane review citation and access rates: discrepancies and implications for understanding how Cochrane reviews are used
• Cochrane Review Group Satellites - an effective way to increase review group capacity? Experiences from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group
• Cochrane Review Initiative Project (CRIP)
• Cochrane Review of interventions for improving adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals: an update
• Cochrane review of school-based interventions for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in adolescents: Why biological outcomes are important
• Cochrane reviews and evidence certainty for neglected tropical diseases
• Cochrane Reviews and multimorbidity: past and future
• Cochrane Reviews and the COMET Initiative. Do they consider the same outcomes for palliative care interventions?
• Cochrane Reviews are not a direct source of information for Swiss physicians
• Cochrane Reviews as privileged sources to report misconduct behaviours: an informative case of duplicate publication
• Cochrane Reviews in dentistry: making sense of evidence at its highest level – an analysis
• Cochrane reviews in health technology assessment reports and clinical guidelines
• Cochrane reviews in inflammatory bowel disease: experiences from a patient author
• Cochrane reviews in obstetrics and gynecology: what is the contribution of Indian studies?
• Cochrane reviews inform UK national policy on disinvestment from ineffective interventions
• Cochrane Reviews need to cope with the flood tide of innovations
• Cochrane reviews of complementary and alternative therapies: evaluating the strength of the evidence
• Cochrane Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions - Improving Quality, Relevance and Utility
• Cochrane Reviews of healthcare interventions for indigenous populations
• Cochrane Reviews to support clinical guidelines: the opportunities and challenges of collaborating with guideline developers
• Cochrane reviews: Beyond implications for research
• Cochrane reviews: teaching critical appraisal skills
• Cochrane reviews: the impact of La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus
• Cochrane Reviews: the linchpins of knowledge translation and impact
• Cochrane reviews: translations help to get evidence into practice
• Cochrane Russia capacity building: Dissemination of Cochrane evidence, improving quality and measuring performance
• Cochrane Russia for trusted evidence: moving forward through the years in numbers
• Cochrane Russia making evidence accessible and advocating for evidence
• Cochrane Russia: establishment, activities and development of a Russian-speaking Cochrane community
• Cochrane simplified Chinese translation and dissemination: a collaborative model of knowledge translation
• Cochrane Skin Group experience with co-publication
• Cochrane SoF Tables "train the trainers" workshop
• Cochrane South Africa training – does it work to increase knowledge and skills in evidence-based healthcare?
• Cochrane Style Guide
• Cochrane systematic review training for Cochrane Eyes and Vision authors
• Cochrane systematic reviews and global burden of disease in children under five: a challenge for developing countries
• Cochrane systematic reviews in China
• Cochrane systematic reviews pertain to the care Of Older adults?
• Cochrane systematic reviews: data representation beyond RevMan
• Cochrane Targeted Updates
• Cochrane Task Exchange Experience During the Coronavirus Pandemic
• Cochrane Textbook of Neurology
• Cochrane Training - facilitation skills: Creating a positive learning climate for effective learning
• Cochrane Training: facilitation skills - creating a positive learning climate for effective learning
• Cochrane UK & Ireland Trainees Advisory Group journal club – using Twitter to engage trainee’s in evidence based medicine
• Cochrane Updating Classification System (UCS): helping readers and editors understand the status of reviews
• Cochrane versus non-Cochrane reviews: an exploration of discordance, comparative quality and relevance for patient information
• Cochrane vignettes: use and satisfaction of Cochrane reviews in a Cochrane learning continuing medical education program
• Cochrane vignettes: use of Cochrane Reviews in a Cochrane learning continuing medical education program
• Cochrane web template project - what is needed?
• Cochrane workshop: Product marketing and management
• Cochrane-based decision support: global evidence at the point of care
• Cochrane-Wikipedia 'edit-a-thon': sharing Cochrane evidence with the world
• Cochrane-Wikipedia Initiative: Hands-on workshop to help improve health content that people are accessing online
• Cochrane—Wiki collaborative effort in evidence dissemination: a concept note
• Cochrane's Highly Sensitive Search Strategies and the Hedges Team Strategies for retrieving studies in systematic reviews: a pragmatic comparison
• Cochrane's presence on Facebook
• Cochrane’s Conflict of Interest Policy Revision Project: bringing together the evidence and stakeholder perspective
• Cochrane’s impact on child health guidance in three Western countries
• Cochrane’s translation strategy: testing new support models to improve sustainability and effectiveness of translation activities
• Coding clinical trials and systematic reviews in The Cochrane Library using standard international schemas
• Coding Scheme for the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group (CCCRG) Specialised Register
• Coerced medication in mental health care – what matters to patients?
• Collaborating on the COVID-NMA initiative – working on a living mapping and living systematic review in a team effort
• Collaboration across languages through the Cochrane network increases the amount of evidence
• Collaboration among Cochrane Fields, Networks and Review Groups to optimize knowledge translation for different stakeholders and audiences
• Collaboration and flexibility in shaping a rapid review: working with government as end-user
• Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross-sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors
• Collaboration between Cochrane groups and specialty journals to improve the efficiency and quality of systematic review publication
• Collaboration in guideline development: European Respiratory Society and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Fellowships in Guideline Methodology
• Collaboration In The Establishment Of A International Register Of Behavioral, Social, And Policy; Intervention Studies I HIV/AIDS Prevention
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaborative knowledge networks (CKN) for guideline development: A Kaiser Permanente and BMJ evidence centre case study
• Collaborative priority setting in clinical research: the James Lind Alliance Neuro-Oncology Priority Setting Partnership
• Collagenase for intervertebral-disk-herniation
• Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative - a systematic review
• Collect meaningful surgical data using an off-line application
• Collecting systematic review data
• Collecting the trials in depression, anxiety & neurosis - what's the point?
• Collecting Unpublished Data for Systematic Reviews: a Proposal for a Randomised Trial
• Collecting unpublished data for systematic reviews: a proposal for a randomised trial
• Collective impact approach for more effective knowledge translation
• College Nursing Students Knowledge of and Self-efficacy in Evidence-based Practice in Taiwan
• Colorectal cancer occurrence in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Combination antiretroviral treatment use in PMTCT programmes: 6-week HIV prevalence and relationship to time of ART initiation and mixed feeding
• Combined p-values of baseline variables of randomized controlled trials published in 2022 indicate non-randomness beyond chance
• Combined psychotherapy plus benzodiazepines for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia
• Combining agribusiness training and skillful parenting to reduce violence against children in impoverished communities in rural Tanzania: A pragmatic cluster randomised-controlled trial
• Combining data reported in logarithmic and raw scales in a meta-analysis
• Combining effect sizes from controlled and uncontrolled study designs: benefit, bias, and control strategies
• Combining evidence from observational and experimental studies in a systematic review: example from a health technology assessment study on laser ablation for varicose veins
• Combining evidence from observational and modelling studies to inform a breast cancer screening guideline
• Combining GP and hospital care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - a randomised controlled trial
• Combining Hierarchical Linear Modeling and non-regression-based effect size metrics in ameta-analysis of single-subject experimental research
• Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in evidence synthesis
• Combining multiple imputation and Bayesian model selection to reduce inconsistency in multiple treatment meta-analysis
• Combining network meta-analysis results with patient preferences to facilitate shared decision making
• Combining parallel and cross-over studies in meta­analysis: a practical example
• Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information in Reviews
• Combining systematic review methods with philosophical analysis for a research ethics review: a case study in bridging disciplines
• Coming full circle: returning to a bespoke search approach for clinical evidence
• Coming soon - reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions! Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR)
• Coming soon: A taxonomy has been developing for core outcomes in pediatric clinical trials
• Commenting on Plain Language Summaries
• Comments on Cochrane Reviews: approaches to managing feedback
• Comments on Cochrane Reviews: who is commenting and what are they saying?
• Common errors in meta-analysis – lessons and learning from the Cochrane review-screening programme
• Common issues and recommendations to improve the assessment of publication bias in systematic reviews
• Common methodological errors in submitted manuscripts for systematic reviews and protocols in public health
• Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: What to look for and how to spot them
• Communicating Cochrane Reviews: experiences with a review specific dissemination strategy
• Communicating Cochrane: An update on the Collaboration’s communications initiative
• Communicating consumer summaries online: a web-based survey
• Communicating evidence in accessible ways: plain language summaries
• Communicating the magnitude of treatment effects: a survey of clinicians in eight countries
• Communicating to Support Evidence Use in Practice: Knowledge Dissemination across Multiple Channels
• Communicating uncertainty from limitations in quality of evidence to the public in written health information: a randomised controlled trial
• Communication is everybody’s business: developing methods to improve the evaluation of communication strategies for childhood vaccination
• Communication of systematic review findings: exploring format preference
• Communication skills training - Canadian breast cancer initiative experience
• Communities generate evidence to inform national advocacy for improved human resources for health in Uganda
• Community and home-based exercise for the prevention and treatment of hypertension
• Community based approach to newborn resuscitation and its impact on survival: a systematic review
• Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations: a Cochrane systematic review
• Community health interventions: are they effective?
• Community mobilization for safe motherhood: a systematic review
• Community perceptions of safe motherhood in Ethiopia: a qualitative needs assessment activity informing the educational component of an intervention study
• Community perspectives on the accessibility and relevance of research evidence on dietary supplements for cancer
• Comparative analysis of clinical trials in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression
• Comparative analysis of the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews for treatment of rotating cuff dysfunctions
• Comparative detection and enumeration methods of diarrhoea causing E. coli in drinking water: Systematic review
• Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for subacromial shoulder conditions: A network meta-analysis
• Comparative efficacy and safety of long-term oral anticoagulation for vascular events
• Comparative efficacy of anti-hypertensive agents in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis
• Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A Network meta-analysis
• Comparative evaluation of information products regarding cancer screening from German-speaking cancer organizations
• Comparative meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: A review and comparison of currently proposed approaches
• Comparative Review of Self-Administered Questionnaires in Vertigo and Dizziness
• Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices.
• Comparative safety and efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: An individual patient data network meta-analysis
• Comparing a systematic review with a Cochrane protocol (submitted, not published) on the subject of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) and heart failure
• Comparing adverse events data from systematic reviews and consumer social media posts
• Comparing apples and oranges? A Bayesian meta-regression of effect estimates from non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials
• Comparing atypical antipsychotic agents using mixed treatment comparisons meta-regression
• Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for network meta-analysis: An empirical study
• Comparing different types of exercises for fall prevention in older people living in the community: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Comparing different ways of presenting evidence and recommendations in guidelines using the randomized link method
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop 1: introduction to indirect comparison and network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop 2: estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop: Estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments 1: intervention review or overview?
• Comparing multiple treatments 1: Overview or intervention review?
• Comparing multiple treatments 2: Statistical methods for network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments 2: statistical methods for network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments: — intervention review or overview – Part 1
• Comparing multiple treatments: an introduction to overviews of reviews
• Comparing multiple treatments: statistical methods for network meta-analysis – Part 2