• Collaboration among Cochrane Fields, Networks and Review Groups to optimize knowledge translation for different stakeholders and audiences
• Collaboration and agility as a strategy to guidelines development: the French experience
• Collaboration and flexibility in shaping a rapid review: working with government as end-user
• Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross-sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors
• Collaboration between Cochrane groups and specialty journals to improve the efficiency and quality of systematic review publication
• Collaboration in guideline development: European Respiratory Society and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Fellowships in Guideline Methodology
• Collaboration In The Establishment Of A International Register Of Behavioral, Social, And Policy; Intervention Studies I HIV/AIDS Prevention
• Collaboration of Cochrane Russia and Cochrane China to support evidence-based policy-making through new guideline assessment and development instruments
• Collaboration on Evidence Synthesis in China: A Network Study of Advancing Research Capacities
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaboration to identify controlled trials in general health care journals in Europe
• Collaborative approaches in guideline development: a survey of organizations handbooks
• Collaborative efforts leading to research routes to impact
  
• Collaborative knowledge networks (CKN) for guideline development: A Kaiser Permanente and BMJ evidence centre case study
• Collaborative priority setting in clinical research: the James Lind Alliance Neuro-Oncology Priority Setting Partnership
• Collaborative scaling of evidence-based primary care implementation in Brazil through the PACK Program: a South–South cooperation in knowledge translation
• Collagenase for intervertebral-disk-herniation
• Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative - a systematic review
• Collect meaningful surgical data using an off-line application
• Collecting systematic review data
• Collecting the trials in depression, anxiety & neurosis - what's the point?
• Collecting unpublished data for systematic reviews: a proposal for a randomised trial
• Collecting Unpublished Data for Systematic Reviews: a Proposal for a Randomised Trial
• Collective impact approach for more effective knowledge translation
• College Nursing Students Knowledge of and Self-efficacy in Evidence-based Practice in Taiwan
• Colorectal cancer occurrence in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Combination antiretroviral treatment use in PMTCT programmes: 6-week HIV prevalence and relationship to time of ART initiation and mixed feeding
• Combined p-values of baseline variables of randomized controlled trials published in 2022 indicate non-randomness beyond chance
• Combined psychotherapy plus benzodiazepines for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia
• Combining agribusiness training and skillful parenting to reduce violence against children in impoverished communities in rural Tanzania: A pragmatic cluster randomised-controlled trial
• Combining data reported in logarithmic and raw scales in a meta-analysis
• Combining effect sizes from controlled and uncontrolled study designs: benefit, bias, and control strategies
• Combining evidence from observational and experimental studies in a systematic review: example from a health technology assessment study on laser ablation for varicose veins
• Combining evidence from observational and modelling studies to inform a breast cancer screening guideline
• Combining GP and hospital care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - a randomised controlled trial
• Combining Hierarchical Linear Modeling and non-regression-based effect size metrics in ameta-analysis of single-subject experimental research
• Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in evidence synthesis
• Combining multiple imputation and Bayesian model selection to reduce inconsistency in multiple treatment meta-analysis
• Combining network meta-analysis results with patient preferences to facilitate shared decision making
• Combining parallel and cross-over studies in meta­analysis: a practical example
• Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information in Reviews
• Combining systematic review methods with philosophical analysis for a research ethics review: a case study in bridging disciplines
• Coming full circle: returning to a bespoke search approach for clinical evidence
• Coming soon - reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions! Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR)
• Coming soon: A taxonomy has been developing for core outcomes in pediatric clinical trials
• Commenting on Plain Language Summaries
• Comments on Cochrane Reviews: approaches to managing feedback
• Comments on Cochrane Reviews: who is commenting and what are they saying?
• Common errors in meta-analysis – lessons and learning from the Cochrane review-screening programme
• Common issues and recommendations to improve the assessment of publication bias in systematic reviews
• Common methodological errors in submitted manuscripts for systematic reviews and protocols in public health
• Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: What to look for and how to spot them
• Communicating Cochrane Reviews: experiences with a review specific dissemination strategy
• Communicating Cochrane: An update on the Collaboration’s communications initiative
• Communicating consumer summaries online: a web-based survey
• Communicating Evidence For Research And Development In Lmics Setting Through Social Media In An Era Of Fake News And Misinformation.
• Communicating evidence in accessible ways: plain language summaries
• Communicating the magnitude of treatment effects: a survey of clinicians in eight countries
• Communicating to Support Evidence Use in Practice: Knowledge Dissemination across Multiple Channels
• Communicating uncertainty from limitations in quality of evidence to the public in written health information: a randomised controlled trial
• Communication and dissemination of pharmacotherapy guidelines for myocardial infarction in Korea
• Communication and Training Interventions for Enhanced Dementia Care in a Residential Care Setting: A Best Practice Implementation Project
• Communication is everybody’s business: developing methods to improve the evaluation of communication strategies for childhood vaccination
• Communication of systematic review findings: exploring format preference
• Communication skills training - Canadian breast cancer initiative experience
• Communities generate evidence to inform national advocacy for improved human resources for health in Uganda
• Community and home-based exercise for the prevention and treatment of hypertension
• Community based approach to newborn resuscitation and its impact on survival: a systematic review
• Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations: a Cochrane systematic review
• Community Engagement in Social Innovation addressing healthcare delivery gaps in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative narrative review
• Community health interventions: are they effective?
• Community mobilization for safe motherhood: a systematic review
• Community perceptions of safe motherhood in Ethiopia: a qualitative needs assessment activity informing the educational component of an intervention study
• Community perspectives on the accessibility and relevance of research evidence on dietary supplements for cancer
• Comparative analysis of chronic disease policies in typical countries
• Comparative analysis of clinical trials in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression
• Comparative analysis of nonpharmacological interventions network meta-analyses using the novel TIP (Theme, Intensity, and Provider/Platform) framework
• Comparative analysis of the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews for treatment of rotating cuff dysfunctions
• Comparative detection and enumeration methods of diarrhoea causing E. coli in drinking water: Systematic review
• Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
• Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Ivermectin, Topical Permethrin, and Its Combination in the Treatment of Scabies
• Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapy on reducing of suicidal reattempts: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
• Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for subacromial shoulder conditions: A network meta-analysis
• Comparative Effectiveness Research of Chinese Medicine and Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine on Treating Pneumonia: a Retrospective Cohort Study
• Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for insomnia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 109 randomized trials
  
• Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Clozapine versus Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Quetiapine in Schizophrenia: An updated Systematic Review
• Comparative efficacy and safety of long-term oral anticoagulation for vascular events
• Comparative efficacy of anti-hypertensive agents in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis
• Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A Network meta-analysis
• Comparative evaluation of information products regarding cancer screening from German-speaking cancer organizations
• Comparative meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: A review and comparison of currently proposed approaches
• Comparative Review of Self-Administered Questionnaires in Vertigo and Dizziness
• Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices.
• Comparative safety and efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: An individual patient data network meta-analysis
• Comparing a systematic review with a Cochrane protocol (submitted, not published) on the subject of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) and heart failure
• Comparing adverse events data from systematic reviews and consumer social media posts
• Comparing an iterative to a conventional systematic search approach for a qualitative evidence synthesis: a methods study using artificial intelligence
• Comparing apples and oranges? A Bayesian meta-regression of effect estimates from non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials
• Comparing atypical antipsychotic agents using mixed treatment comparisons meta-regression
• Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for network meta-analysis: An empirical study
• Comparing different types of exercises for fall prevention in older people living in the community: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Comparing different ways of presenting evidence and recommendations in guidelines using the randomized link method
• Comparing Intention-to-Treat and Modified Intention-to-Treat Analyses in the Context of Migraine Research – A Study Within a Review
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop 1: introduction to indirect comparison and network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop 2: estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple interventions workshop: Estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments 1: intervention review or overview?
• Comparing multiple treatments 1: Overview or intervention review?
• Comparing multiple treatments 2: statistical methods for network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments 2: Statistical methods for network meta-analysis
• Comparing multiple treatments: — intervention review or overview – Part 1
• Comparing multiple treatments: an introduction to overviews of reviews
• Comparing multiple treatments: statistical methods for network meta-analysis – Part 2
• Comparing prevention efficacy of acute mountain sickness between different medicines: a network meta-analysis
• Comparing preventive strategies in hypertension: risk prediction or blood pressure level? Insight from a meta-analysis based on individual patient data
• Comparing quality assessments of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in nutrition using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: Betwixt and between
• Comparing recommendations in two national guidelines on dementia using the same scientific evidence
• Comparing risk of bias between prospectively and retrospectively registered trials in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)
• Comparing the Impact of the Cochrane library in Web of Science and Scopus
• Comparing the performance of three tools for semi-automated abstract screening when conducting systematic reviews: Abstrackr, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst
• Comparing the practice of study classification and study inclusion in different systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
• Comparing user preferences and understanding for two formats of evidence profiles. A randomized trial
• Comparing various approaches for network meta-analysis regarding effect estimation and evaluation of inconsistency
• Comparison between Autocad and Draftsight in data extraction
• Comparison between CINeMA and GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence from network meta-analysis: a randomized controlled study
• Comparison between randomized clinical trials designating an outcome as primary and those designating the same outcome as secondary
• Comparison of several systematic review process software tools among health care professionals: A questionnaire based survey.
• Comparison of acute and chronic airway diseases in the Cochrane Library: implications for clinicians and researchers
• Comparison of adverse effects data derived from different study designs
• Comparison of alternative evidence summary and presentation formats in clinical guideline development: a mixed-method study
• Comparison of AMSTAR 2 with ROBIS in systematic reviews including randomized and non-randomized studies
• Comparison of clinical practice guidelines between western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine on 18 diseases in China: an evidence-based literature review
• Comparison of conference abstracts and full-text articles of randomized controlled trials in the field of pain: reporting quality and agreement in results
• Comparison of Copas selection model for publication bias and trimand-fill
• Comparison of current and previous approaches to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews
• Comparison of descriptions of blinding in trial protocols and the published reports
• Comparison of diagnostic test accuracy estimates using the Multiple Thresholds Model based on complete and published cut-off data with a bimodal reporting pattern
• Comparison of different MEDLINE search engines
• Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study of COVID-19 trials
• Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults
• Comparison of evidence-based answer retrieval from four bedside information sources: a randomized controlled trial
• Comparison of four methods for meta-analysis of survival data
• Comparison of holding chambers and nebulisers for beta-agonists in acute asthma, (a systematic review)
• Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health related interventions
• Comparison of linguistic characteristics of plain language summaries of systematic reviews between medical and non-medical sciences: a cross-sectional study
• Comparison of Medline and Embase retrieval of RCTs of the effects of educational interventions on asthma-related outcomes
• Comparison of meta-analysis methods for synthesizing heterogeneous studies
• Comparison of methods of grading bodies of evidence and strength of recommendations used by clinical practice guideline groups
• Comparison of methods of handling missing data in individual patient data meta-analyses; an empirical example on antibiotics in children with acute otitis media
• Comparison of methods to evaluate the quality of evidence in resource studies: a pilot study
• Comparison of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes to aid decision making
• Comparison of Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) as risk of bias assessment tools for cohort studies
• Comparison of NNT statistics, impact numbers and epidemiological effect measures
• Comparison of outcome reporting in clinical study reports, journal publications and registry reports in the field of telecardiology
• Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes specified in registry entries with journal publications
• Comparison of protocols to published articles for randomised controlled trials
• Comparison of RCTs and observational studies: implications for benefit assessment in health care and health policy decision-making in light of effect size, PICO and certainty of evidence
• Comparison of results from different imputation techniques of missing data in an anti-obesity drug trial
• Comparison of RIGHT and AGREE reporting checklists for healthcare practice guidelines
• Comparison of selection models in meta-analysis
• Comparison of single versus double data extraction: a pilot study
• Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study
• Comparison of statistical tests on bias in meta-analysis with binary outcome
• Comparison of tap water and saline for wound cleansing: an overview of systematic reviews
• Comparison of test performance of liquid-based versus conventional Pap smears to detect cervical cancer precursors
• Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist and Newcastle Ottawa Scale as risk-of-bias tools
• Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics updated Quality Criteria Checklist and Cochrane's ROB 2.0 as risk of bias tools
• Comparison of the attention of reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in recent seven years
• Comparison of the attention of trial registration in selective countries in the Asia-Pacific region
• Comparison of the attention paid to reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in the last three years
• Comparison of the attention paid to trial registration in the Asia-Pacific region in the last three years
• Comparison of the Cochrane Neonatal Group systematic reviews and Danish guidelines for newborns
• Comparison of the diagnostic criteria and efficacy evaluation criteria in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese herbal medicine
• Comparison of the methodological quality of RCTs using RoB-2 and JBI tools: performing of medical students
• Comparison of the priority action areas in oral health with the evidence available in The Cochrane Library
• Comparison of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies in the Assessment of Hormone Replacement Therapy
• Comparison of the tests of homogeneity based on odds ratio and risk difference for interaction
• Comparison of three approaches for question selection in a clinical practice guideline development
  
• Comparison of trends in study designs types in LILACS and PubMed in the last decade
• Comparison of two different search strategies in identifying literature for a diagnostic test accuracy review of Down's Syndrome screening
• Comparison of two experiences of development of healthcare quality indicators
• Competencies in global healthcare leadership training programmes: protocol for a scoping review and curricular content analysis
  
• Competencies needed for patient involvement in patient-oriented research: report of a scoping review of the literature
• Competency profiles for Evidence-Informed Policy (EIPM): a rapid review
• Competing events and in-hospital follow-up: issues to be aware of
• Compiling evidence to guide policy decisions on the introduction of the influenza vaccine in Kenya
• Complementary and alternative medicine in stroke rehabilitation—a systematic review of systematic reviews
• Complementary medicine use for arthritis patients in Korea: a systematic review of prevalence studies
• Complementary medicine use in the adult congenital heart community: what evidence do patients need and want?
• Completeness of outcome specification across Cochrane Systematic Reviews of three common eye conditions: time to be more explicit!
• Completeness of outcomes description reported in low-back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane Reviews
• Completeness of reporting of exercise training interventions in cancer randomized controlled trials published after 2010
• Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke: a systematic review
• Completeness of reporting of rapid reviews of primary studies according to journal publication status using PRISMA and PRISMA for Abstracts
• Completing a full systematic review in under two weeks: processes, barriers and facilitators
• Completing a search summary tabel (SST)