• Cost-effectiveness of LVAD versus Optimal Medical Therapy for End Stage Heart Failure.
• Cost-Effectiveness of Nasal Calcitonin in Postmenopausal Women. Using Cochrane Collaboration Methods in Economic Evaluation
• Cost-effectiveness ratio of public oral care from a health service and societal perspective in Brazil, a middle-income country
• Costs and cost-outcomes of school feeding programs in Africa
• Costs of randomised-controlled trials – a systematic review and empirical case series
• Could a search for a diagnostic test accuracy review be restricted to MEDLINE?
• Could do better? Search methods in recent oral health systematic reviews
• Could GRADE approach be applied into systematic reviews of etiological studies?
• Could GRADE be applied into network meta analysis?
• Could LILACS database be a relevant source for evidence about neglected diseases?
• Could the impact factor of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) be improved by prioritizing updates of Cochrane reviews based on citation data?
• Could the level of trial's pragmatism be a source of heterogeneity in systematic reviews?
• Country development and publication bias: a review of published studies
• Country of affiliation for the authors of an international evidence-based healthcare publication: an evaluation of Clinical Evidence
• Country-level Pilot Programmes for SDGs in China: An Evidence Gap Map
• Country-specific qualitative synthesis: harvesting pearls or grit?
• Country’s Capacity Building for Evidence Based Health Care – Ethiopia’s continued efforts
  
• Courriels Cochrane: a knowledge translation project
• Course 'Hot topics in pharmacotherapyá: A way to disseminate evidence
• Course of serological outcomes in treated subjects with chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection: A meta-analysis of individual participant data conducted in Argentina
• Coverage and quality of diagnostic and outcomes studies of telemedicine services
• Coverage, comprehensiveness and quality of Cochrane Reviews to answer questions in National Guidelines
• COVID-19 literature surveillance—A framework to manage the literature and support evidence-based decision-making on a rapidly evolving public health topic
• COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study
  
• Covidence Forum - a discussion of Cochrane's recommended online tool for review production
• Covidence Forum - a discussion of Cochrane's recommended online tool for review production
• Covidence, a multi-lingual tool that helps to produce systematic reviews (in Spanish)
• Covidence: Cochrane's new online tool for review production
• Covidence: creating a Data Extraction 1 template for intervention reviews
  
• Cracking the Code: Deciphering AI's Role in SDG Mapping
  
• CRD databases: new interface, new content
• Creating a Community of Practice for Dissemination in Cochrane
• Creating a Cycle of Change and Support: Quality and Productivity Improvement at a Collaborative Review Group
• Creating a national research agenda for improvement science
• Creating a Rapid Learning Primary Healthcare System(PHC) in Iran (Developing a framework for implementation); Study protocol
• Creating a systematic review infrastructure: Implementing Cochrane tools for students, teachers, researchers and clinicians in a university setting
• Creating accessible patient guidelines based on oncological evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
• Creating an inventory of health policy trials
• Creating an optimal search strategy for occupational health intervention studies
• Creating evidence tables for use in systematic reviews and guideline development: GRADE approach
• Creating impact: strategies and resources for improving dissemination and communication of Cochrane content
• Creating living systematic reviews with citizen scientists and machine learning
• Creating open-access, evidence-based decision aids for patients with skin disease
• Creating patient guidelines in close collaboration with multidisciplinary teams
  
• Creating the "Evidence Base" for a drug benefit policy change: use Of systematic reviews and a randomized policy trial
• Creation of a non-English speaking branch of CCNet: the Iberoamerican Network of Consumers
• Creative e-teaching and e-learning of evidence-based medicine in resident physicians by multimedia technology
• Creatively communicating our research: using comics and illustration for reflection and dissemination in health research
• Credence: creation of reliable evidence in developing countries by continuous enabling
• CReST (Cochrane Review Screening Tool): developing a search process to identify implementable evidence
• CRISP: online summaries of Cochrane Reviews for policy
• Criteria for improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Alternatives to the ACR 20.
• Criteria for judging the effectiveness of public health interventions
• Critical analysis of the factors associated with enteral feeding in preventing VAP: a systematic review
• Critical appraisal abilities in the USA: an online assessment of parents and undergraduate students
• Critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews of clinical prediction models
• Critical appraisal criteria for clinical guidelines in Germany. - A project of the German Medical Association (GMA) and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASH3P)
• Critical appraisal of clinical guidelines: Assessing the validity of guidelines for the treatment of asthma
• Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for adaptation in the field of “male lower urinary tract symptoms”
• Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for treatment of pancreatic cancer based on the global disease burden
• Critical Appraisal of Reviews Using Qualitative Comparative Analyses (CARU-QCA): a tool to critically appraise systematic reviews that use qualitative comparative analysis
• Critical appraisal of the difficult airway clinical practice guidelines
• Critical appraisal skills for consumer advocates: assessing a new online course
• Critical appraisal skills for consumers: understanding the evidence using an online course on evidence-based health care for consumer advocates
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
• CRITICAL ASSESSMENT ABOUT THE USE OF GRADE IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES: A METHODOLOGICAL META-REVIEW
• Critical assessment of randomized controlled trials published in biomedical Chilean journals
• Critical interpretive synthesis: what it is and why it is needed
• Critical Literature Review of Systematic Reviews on Chronic Low Back Pain
• Critical outcomes in a Cochrane Systematic Review: patients’ perspective
• Critical reporting elements for publications of research and systematic reviews of complex interventions
• Critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology
• Critical triangulation of movement test, questionnaires, and observational assessment
• Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) one-day workshop—‘CAT in a day’
• Critically appraising guidelines II: the quantity and quality of UK clinical guidelines for the management of asthma, coronary artery disease, breast cancer, lung cancer, and depression
• Criticisms Submitted to the British Medical Journal and the Cochrane Library: A Comparison
• Cross-cultural adaptation and validation into Spanish of the Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire
• Cross-over trials – are we doing it right? Are they doing it right?
• Cross-over trials—are they doing it right? Are we doing it right?
• Cross-sectional Study of 19th Cochrane Colloquium Abstract Quality
• Cross-sectional study of abstract quality
• Crowd-sourcing structured metadata to improve literature search efficiency
• Crowd-sourcing the identification of rehabilitation-relevant review: a Cochrane Rehabilitation initiative
• Crowdfunding for a systematic review
• Crowdsourcing and machine learning: finding lost trials together
• Crowdsourcing trainees in a living systematic review provided valuable experiential learning opportunities: a mixed-methods study
• Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) latex agglutination (LA) testing in blood serum for diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis in patients with HIV infection
• Cultivating physician scientists by combining of ‘Clinical-based PBL EBM learning’ and ‘Minions systematic review training camp' programs
• Cultural adaptation and validation of quality of discharge teaching scale – parent form (PedQDTS) for Brazilian context
  
• Cultural adaptation of interventions to reduce pesticide exposure among farmworkers: A systematic review
• Cultural adaptation of knowledge translation tools for parents of children with acute illnesses
• Culturally-oriented Strategies for Communicating Cochrane Evidence on Malaria and HIV/AIDS prevention and Control in a Developing Country Setting: A Community-focused Approach
• Cultures of evidence among decision-makers in non-health fields: systematic review
• Cumulative meta-analysis of the efficacy of acupuncture on conventional therapy-induced side effects in oncology patients
• Cumulative meta-analysis to determine key milestones in the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE-ECC)
• Cumulative meta-analysis to determine key milestones in the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE)
• Cumulative network meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and actual prescriptions for post-menopausal osteoporosis: a meta-epidemiological study
• Current Cochrane acupuncture reviews might be biased without searching Chinese, Korean and Japanese databases
• Current curriculum and training program of evidence-based health care (EBHC) for undergraduate students: Taiwan’s experience
• Current grading system using in clinical practice guideline recommendations developed by adaptation method
• Current level of Campbell activities in China
• Current malaria clinical trials activity on the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry and comparison to a historical cohort
• Current practice in systematic reviews for structuring the PICO for synthesis and the use of synthesis methods other than meta-analysis
• Current practice of Filipino physiotherapists in Metro Manila, Philippines
• Current situation, problem and countermeasures of municipal public health system: a view of evidence-based medicine
• Current status and future perspectives of health technology assessment in Germany
• Current status and future perspectives of health technology assessment in Germany
• Current status and methodological research on sample size estimation methods for clinical prediction models*
  
• Current status of PROMs in guidelines on osteoarthritis: a review
• Current status of the national clinical research program producing trusted evidence in Korea
• Current trends in clinical practice guideline development for traditional Chinese medicine in pediatrics: A scoping review
  
• Current trends in the treatment of patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: A scoping review.
• Curricular integration of the JBI model into doctoral nursing education to promote wide adoption of evidence implementation in practice
• Curriculum reform at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile School of Medicine: an opportunity to review the teaching of evidence-based medicine
• Cutaneous Leishmaniasis International Observatory: An initiative for Evidence-based Global Health
• Czech National Screening Centre: example of knowledge translation of cancer screening in the European and in the national context
• D-mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections in adults and children
• D.I.C.E. therapy: an overview of the randomised trials
• Dan Shen agents for acute ischaemic stroke
• Data Abstraction Assistant (DAA) – What can it do and does it work?
• Data Abstraction Assistant (DAA): a new open-access tool being developed and tested in a randomized controlled trial
• Data Abstraction Assistant, a new tool, saves time without compromising the accuracy of data abstraction during systematic reviews
• Data analysis and presentation methods in umbrella reviews/ overviews of reviews: a cross-sectional study
• Data cleaning in the Cochrane Register of Studies
• Data completeness and quality: the results of the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 2011 data audits
• Data extraction and analysis of data on adverse effects in systematic reviews
• Data extraction errors in meta-analyses using standardised mean differences
• Data extraction problems associated with RCTS of cross-over design assessing the effects of medical treatment for menorrhagia
• Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health
• Data management in real-world study
• Data maturity and systematic reviews of new health technologies
• Data reuse, machine learning, and crowdsourcing in Screen4Me: how screening burden can be reduced substantially and reliably
• Data sharing policies across the health research lifecycle: a cross-sectional analysis of global funders, ethics committees, trial registries, journals and data repositories
• Data sharing: experiences accessing individual participant data for a collaborative meta-analysis on umbilical cord management strategies at preterm birth.
• Data sharing: is it getting easier to access individual participant data? Experiences from the Cochrane Epilepsy Group
• Data sovereignty and governance—should we be considering this in systematic reviews?
• Data synthesis in drug class reviews aimed at public health policy audiences: further development of optimal models is needed
• Database of appraised studies on patients’ values and preferences
• Database of patients’ organizations in Latin America & the Caribbean
• Database search of trial registries to identify unpublished data for cancer-related systematic reviews
• Database searching in manual medicine
• De-duplication: new methods to reduce the manual burden of systematic searches
• Dealing with complexity in systematic reviews through outcome categorisation and selection
• Dealing with conceptual and methodological issues in reviews Of complex interventions: Reflections on a review of interventions to promote patient centred care
• Dealing with Drop-outs in Clinical Trials and Meta-analyses
• Dealing with heterogeneity
• Dealing with heterogeneity in treatment implementation: an example from music therapy in psychiatry
• Dealing with methodologic challenges in systematic reviews addressing baseline risk
• Dealing with missing data in an individual participant data meta-analysis: one-­stage versus two­-stage methods
• Dealing with publication bias
• Dealing With Publication Bias: Different Mechanisms For Different Types Of Studies?
• Dealing with retrieval bias for an evidence-informed individual patient data network meta-analysis
• Debunking the Shadows: Common myths and misconceptions about evidence-based practice
  
• DEC-NET: the European register of clinical trials on medicines for children
• Deciding when a guideline will stand the test of time – the use of a static list
• Deciding when to include non-randomized studies of interventions in a Cochrane Review of an intervention
• Deciding when to make a Cochrane Review update the final iteration
• Decision aids from current systematic reviews for the clinical encounter
• Decision antecedents and outcomes of shared decision-making in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases
• Decision makers find it difficult to compare and select similar systematic reviews based on quality, methods and results: a cross-sectional survey
• Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic strategies: A framework provides guidance for when research providing test-accuracy information is sufficient
• Decision support for use automation tools in selecting references during systematic reviews
• Decision-makers’ perceptions and use of HTAs produced by an Argentinean agency: a qualitative study and a survey
• Declarations and conflicts of interest in WHO guidelines
• Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: an exploration of the review, study, and publication characteristics associated with Abstrackr's relevance predictions
• Deficient reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority clinical trials in antiretroviral-na"ive HIV patients: A systematic review
• Defining and assessing the certainty of evidence for diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and guidelines
• Defining and evaluating quality of evidence in 'Summary of findings' tables
• Defining and evaluating quality of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
• Defining appropriateness criteria for performance measures
• Defining misinformation and related terms: a scoping review of the health-related literature
• Defining Racial Health Equity (RHE): A Landscape Review of Definitions, Terminology and Related Concepts
• Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy
• Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews
• Defining study designs in The Cochrane Collaboration: Do all Cochrane Review Groups talk the same language?
• Defining variation in outcome reporting: a review of systematic reviews in women’s and newborns' health
• Definitely Maybe: How is uncertainty expressed in Cochrane reviews?
• Definition and reporting of composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials on pharmacological interventions for coronary artery disease
• Definition of eligibility for non-randomised studies in 113 Cochrane Reviews of interventions to prevent healthcare-associated infections
• Definition, disclosure and management of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review
• Definitions and Themes of “Racial Health Equity”: A Systematic Review
  
• Definitions of intention-to-treat in the face of missing outcome data: A systematic survey of methodology papers
• Deja vu: a new database tool complementing systematic reviews in detecting duplicate publications
• Delivering evidence in a patient-focused manner: the example of the European Breast Guidelines
• Delivering on priorities: developing and implementing effective collaboration between a Cochrane Review Group (CRG) and a Cochrane Field
• Delivery arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
• Delphi list: a consensus criteria list to assess trial quality
• Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process to establish an indicator system to evaluate rational drug use in children with primary nephrotic syndrome
• Delphi's twin: a method to improve the quality of standards in medicine
• Dementia guidelines in Europe: the EuroCoDe database and consensus guideline
• Dementia-friendly environmental assessment and management of patient with dementia in community: a best practice implementation project
  
• Demonstrating evidence-based practice
• Demonstrating evidence-based practice
• Demonstration of DIPEX: A Database of Individual Patient Experiences
• Demystifying clinical trials and systematic reviews for the public ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Demystifying R Part 1: How to use Shiny apps in information retrieval
• Demystifying R Part 2: An introduction to coding in R and RStudio
• Dependent observations in RCTs regarding carpal tunnel syndrome
• Deprescribing reduces mortality in older adults: a systematic review