• Making sense of scientific evidence: how consumers can contribute to Cochrane Reviews – Part 2 2013 Québec City
• Making sense of treatments with anticancer drugs for advanced cancer: A comprehensive effectiveness, safety and appropriateness evaluation from the ASTAC-project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Making sense of umbrella reviews 2007 Sao Paulo
• Making summary data from systematic reviews interactive – The Systematic Review Data Repository 2.0 (SRDR 2.0) 2019 Santiago
• Making systematic review data open access – an example with the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Satellite and the Systematic Review Data Repository 2016 Seoul
• Making systematic reviews impactful through knowledge-translation strategies and tools 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Making systematic reviews relevant to health care professionals 1999 Rome
• Making the best use of limited resource: An introduction to health economics in guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Making the case for investing in public health: Return on investment 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Making the evidence accessible – Improvement of Wikipedia entries by incorporating Cochrane Review results in Haematology 2020 Abstracts
• Making the GRADE approach for network meta-analysis more efficient 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Making the resources of the Cochrane Collaboration 'of, by and for the people': a developing country perspective 2005 Melbourne
• Making the results of Cochrane reviews more accessible and friendly 2004 Ottawa
• Malaysian authors’ perception on the degree of consensus in Cochrane Review development: a preliminary survey 2014 Hyderabad
• Malaysian experience of training journalists in understanding research evidence: A Cochrane Geographic Groups Consumer Engagement and Involvement Challenge Fund project 2023 London
• Management of frequent attenders in primary care 1996 Adelaide
• Management of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms 2010 Keystone
• Management of Vascular Anomalies and Hip Dysplasia in Children According to International Recommendations 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Management strategies for peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori eradication 1997 Amsterdam
• Management strategies for peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori eradication 1997 Amsterdam
• Managing a very large systematic review of observational studies and randomized trials without compromising on methodological rigor 2018 Edinburgh
• Managing high volumes of evidence in systematic reviews: an umbrella review of approaches in Covid-19 vaccine reviews 2023 London
• Managing Increasing Volumes Of Evidence in Systematic Reviews: An Overview Of Reviews Of Covid-19 Vaccines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Managing overlap in overviews of reviews: a cross-sectional survey of the published literature between 2015 and 2017 2018 Edinburgh
• Managing the editorial process: an advanced workshop for Cochrane Review Group Super Users in Phase 2 of the Cochrane Information Management System 2005 Melbourne
• Managing the international websites of The Cochrane Collaboration: selecting the right content management system 2006 Dublin
• Managing updates: editorial processes 2014 Hyderabad
• Managing your search results and undertaking screening and selection using JBI SUMARI 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Manipulating the evidence? - A critical review of review articles on the effectiveness of spinal manipulation 1994 Hamilton
• Manipulating the type, timing and amount of input from reviewers with different expertise to reduce bias in systematic review: a case report 1997 Amsterdam
• Manual and electronic search for clinical trials in Brazilian journals on Angiology and Vascular surgery 2000 Cape Town
• Manual Therapy For Neck Disorders 1999 Rome
• Manual versus Web of Science-based tabulation of included studies to determine overlap in overviews of reviews: does it save time? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Many hands make light work—or do they? Results of two pilot studies looking at the effects of crowdsourcing 2013 Québec City
• Many hands make light work—or do they? Results of two pilot studies looking at the effects of crowdsourcing 2013 Québec City
• MAPA: a live meta-analysis with customized tables in a live map 2013 Québec City
• Mapi Research Institute Health-related Quality of Life Database (IQOD) Project. 1999 Rome
• Mapping Chilean clinical research: characteristics of scientific production and alternative metrics. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping Cochrane systematic reviews: the next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age 2012 Auckland
• Mapping Connections: Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Malaria Drug Resistance Evidence Uptake 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping equity in evidence base to promote healthy ageing 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping initiatives for evidence synthesis, economic evaluation, and clinical guidelines development training through online courses in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping methods to deal with commonly encountered scenarios in overviews of reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• Mapping outcomes reported in primary studies of interventions addressing access to food in LMICs to inform a core outcome set 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping priority topics for nutrition research 2016 Seoul
• Mapping research gaps in interventions related to Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5-A (maternal mortality) in the 'Implication for Researchá section of Cochrane reviews 2011 Madrid
• Mapping review of empirical studies on regulation, postmarket surveillance and implementation of medical devices 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping Reviews and Evidence Gap Maps: Evidence syntheses for broader health questions 2023 London
• Mapping Reviews and Evidence Gap Maps: Evidence syntheses for broader research questions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping Reviews, Scoping Reviews and Evidence and Gap Maps (EGMs) – Same but Different. The ‘Big Picture’ Review Family 2023 London
• Mapping studies for inclusion in a Cochrane Overview of physical activity 2016 Seoul
• Mapping synthesis of overviews of Cochrane systematic reviews as an evidence implementation tool for clinicians 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping systematic review evidence on yoga interventions: what has been done and are there gaps? 2018 Edinburgh
• Mapping the clinical guideline gap for forcibly displaced people living in temporary camps 2018 Edinburgh
• Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision-making in health care 2005 Melbourne
• Mapping the Cochrane evidence in infectious diseases 2013 Québec City
• Mapping the Cochrane intervention reviews related to physical activity for chronic noncommunicable disease 2012 Auckland
• Mapping the Cochrane Library for decision making in Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for prevention and treatment of mental disorders 2015 Vienna
• Mapping the evidence in neurotrauma: The results of the 2010 Keystone
• Mapping the Evidence Related to Health and Climate Change Mitigation 2023 London
• Mapping the evidence: Different approaches to evidence mapping across disciplines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping the growth of The Cochrane Collaboration in India 2014 Hyderabad
• Mapping the knowledge needs of Cochrane Field stakeholders: a gaps analysis 2016 Seoul
• Mapping the Landscape: A Comprehensive Review of Global Warming and Human Health 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping the Maps: Methods and Uses of Evidence and Gap Maps. 2023 London
• Mapping the terrain: searching for cancer systematic reviews for the Cancer Specialist Library 2005 Melbourne
• Mapping Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine evidencea 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mapping trials: the HIV/AIDS trials register leads the way to GIS Mapping 2005 Melbourne
• Mapping tuberculosis treatment intervention trials in Africa 2018 Edinburgh
• Maps are for everyone: PPI in systematic evidence maps can have significant benefits for understanding findings, relevance and application 2018 Edinburgh
• Marcroeconomic adjustment policies and their effect on health in Kenya 2000 Cape Town
• Masks for preventing COVID-19 infection: a scoping review 2020 Abstracts
• Mass media interventions for promoting HIV testing: challenges of incorporating interrupted time series analysis 2005 Melbourne
• Mass media interventions for smoking prevention and cessation: systematic review for the Korea Preventive Services Task Force 2016 Seoul
• Massage for pain: an overview of systematic reviews 2019 Santiago
• Massive production of meta-analyses of antidepressants with industry authorship or industry-related conflicts 2014 Hyderabad
• Mastering the art of the plain language summary 2013 Québec City
• Matching guideline questions to Cochrane Review questions – a linked data test case 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Matching policy and practice questions to methodological approaches: a novel tool to support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Maternal anaemia and risk of adverse birth and health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis 2014 Hyderabad
• Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants (Review) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• MaternaMente: evidence-based active childbirth group support 2012 Auckland
• Maximizing collaboration between university students and Cochrane 2023 London
• Maximizing collaboration between university students and the Iberoamerican Cochrane Network (in Spanish) 2019 Santiago
• Maximizing diversity and minimizing research waste: research prioritization in PenCLAHRC 2019 Santiago
• Maximizing impact: a novel prioritization tool for effective health knowledge translation products 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Maximizing Research Efficiency: A Staged Review Process to Mitigate Research Waste 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Maximizing retrieval of relevant studies: the Potential Source Study Classification System 1998 Baltimore
• Maximizing the potential of data associated with Cochrane reviews: Opportunities and future directions for the new review data package 2023 London
• Maximizing the Use of the Cochrane library through librarian-clinician partnerships 2000 Cape Town
• Maximizing the value of IPD when meta-analysing randomised trials 2023 London
• May exogenous gangliosides cause Guillain-Barre syndrome? An opportunity for reviewing Cochrane reviews 1999 Rome
• McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) performs well for identifying new studies to be included in updates of Cochrane Collaboration systematic reviews 2010 Keystone
• Measurement harmonization in individual-participant-data meta-analysis 2013 Québec City
• Measurement instruments in digital education research: A systematic review of validity evidence and psychometric properties 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring and reporting adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in randomised controlled trials: observations from a Cochrane review 2008 Freiburg
• Measuring and reporting of statistical heterogeneity in reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2013 Québec City
• Measuring behaviour change for preventing HIV transmission in schools using cricket games through a randomised-controlled trial in Cameroon 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring behavioural change outcomes in development aid: A call for standardisation to improve the evidence synthesis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring costs of randomized clinical trials: development of a standardized tool 2016 Seoul
• Measuring global health inequalities: the Gini, Theil and Slope inequality index for 291 diseases and injuries and 76 risk factors 2015 Vienna
• Measuring impact of systematic reviews using individual participant data: evidence from clinical guidelines 2013 Québec City
• Measuring impact, assessing priorities and delivering high-quality timely reviews to improve patient health outcomes 2018 Edinburgh
• Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care: A mixed methods systematic review on theories and instruments 2011 Madrid
• Measuring outcomes in fertility trials - can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates? 2007 Sao Paulo
• Measuring suicide-related outcomes in children and adolescents who have been prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) 2012 Auckland
• Measuring the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation: direct or indirect measurement of change? 1997 Amsterdam
• Measuring the gaps between Cochrane reviews and practice recommendations: the example of cost B13 European guidelines for low-back pain 2004 Ottawa
• Measuring the impact and quality of clinical practice guidelines on national direct oral anticoagulants consumption in COVID-19 pandemic in Russia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring the impact of a laboratory practice guideline on immunohistochemical assay validation: Results from multiple modalities 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring the impact of participating in community-engaged evidence synthesis research 2018 Edinburgh
• Measuring the long-term sustainability of an evidence-based innovation programme - dysphagia identification and management in post-stroke patients: A study protocol 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring the patient safety culture in a pharmacy setting in China 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Measuring the quality of end-of-life care: Palliative care of cancer patients 2011 Madrid
• Measuring update ability of evidence-based practice online point-of-care information services 2010 Keystone
• Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews. A cross-sectional study 2023 London
• Mechanisms of implementing public health interventions: a pooled causal mediation analysis of randomised trials 2018 Edinburgh
• MECIR standards for Plain Language Summaries: the PLEACS project 2012 Auckland
• Media awareness and effective dissemination: strategies for seeking out great Cochrane stories and sharing Cochrane evidence with the media 2016 Seoul
• Media awareness and story content; strategies for seeking out great Cochrane stories and sharing them with the media 2015 Vienna
• Media training 2006 Dublin
• Medical Management for Miscarriage 2002 Stavanger
• Medical students learning of reporting guidelines based on the EQUATOR Network 2018 Edinburgh
• Medical students’ attitudes towards research education and opportunities during their training: a cross-sectional survey at McMaster University 2016 Seoul
• Medico-legal issues related to mammographic screening 1997 Amsterdam
• Medizin-transparent and MedBusters – evidence-based fact-checking services for the German-speaking lay public 2018 Edinburgh
• medrxivr: A new tool for searching for and retrieving records and PDFs from the medRxiv preprint repository 2020 Abstracts
• MeerKat: getting the most out of your study-based Specialized Register 2005 Melbourne
• Meeting challenges associated with complex systematic reviews with equity considerations. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Meeting diverse learning needs of Cochrane Information Specialists (CIS): survey results on resources and services from the CIS Support Team 2019 Santiago
• Meeting end-user needs through rapid evidence reviews: a partnership case study 2013 Québec City
• Meeting the challenge of research empowerment through co-production and expert patient review 2018 Edinburgh
• Meeting the challenges of undertaking and communicating complex reviews with ‘messy’ messages: the case of the health effects of mixed income communities 2010 Keystone
• Meeting the need for speed: How to do a rapid review following the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Men’s perceptions of the physical consequences of a radical prostatectomy on their quality of life: A qualitative systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mental health & preterm birth: abstract submission for oral presentation 2020 Abstracts
• Mental health interventions for climate change-related humanitarian disasters: A systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mental health services for serious mental illness: a map of randomized controlled trials 2019 Santiago
• Mentoring clinicians in conducting systematic reviews through a clinical fellowship program 2011 Madrid
• Mentoring for the Planning and Implementation of Systematic Review courses in Brazilian Graduate Programs: an experience report 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mentoring to make a difference: it takes a village to raise a systematic review (for implementation in policy or practice) 2018 Edinburgh
• Mentorship, Community, and Evidence Synthesis Across Borders: Experiences of Cochrane US Year 2 Mentees 2023 London
• Message Lab – a platform for research and improvement of public health messages 2023 London
• Meta analysis of continuous covariates in observa­tional studies 2009 Singapore
• Meta analysis with qualitative synthesis on the effects of self-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes: methodological perspectives on qualitative data in reviews of effects 2009 Singapore
• Meta-aesthetics: the use of artistically inspired methods to conceptualize, synthesize, and disseminate findings of systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Meta-aggregation as a method to synthesise qualitative evidence: history and development 2016 Seoul
• Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of quality of life outcomes: preliminary results and work in progress 2005 Melbourne
• Meta-analyses for regulatory purposes: the case of esketamine 2020 Abstracts
• Meta-analyses from different sources of information 1996 Adelaide
• Meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy 2018 Edinburgh
• Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be replicated 2019 Santiago
• Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced 2020 Abstracts
• Meta-analyses of early postnatal dexamethsone (dx) for prevention of chronic lung disease (CLD) 1997 Amsterdam
• Meta-analyses of placebo controlled trials of disease-modifying antirrheumatic drugs (DMARDS) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis 1998 Baltimore
• Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods 2006 Dublin
• Meta-analyses of trials with low and high risk of bias in the randomisation domain may yield substantially different results 2023 London
• Meta-analysis as a simultaneous inference problem: a novel approach to assess replicability of evidence 2020 Abstracts
• Meta-analysis comparing the effects of low risk nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the gastric and duodenal mucosa 1995 Oslo
• Meta-analysis in translational research is not a straightforward road. A case-study on IL-6 and depression 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analysis methods for better validation of prediction models 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analysis methods used in systematic reviews of interrupted time series studies 2020 Abstracts
• Meta-analysis of adverse events data using a hierarchical Bayesian model: a case study 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analysis of Calcitonin for Corticosteroid-Induced Osteoporosis 1999 Rome
• Meta-analysis of case-series: graphical methods for selecting functional forms of exposed factors and model 1998 Baltimore
• Meta-analysis of clinical trials with cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A in MS patients 1997 Amsterdam
• Meta-analysis of continuous data 2006 Dublin
• Meta-analysis of continuous data 2005 Melbourne
• Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: systematic review of methods available for dealing with missing mean and standard deviation values 2014 Hyderabad
• Meta-analysis of cross-over trials 2006 Dublin
• Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: SROC modelling - the profile log-likelihood approach based upon the proportional hazard model 2011 Madrid
• Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies for healthcare policy and decision making 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data 2008 Freiburg
• Meta-analysis of mean differences in minimal important difference units: application with appropriate variance calculations 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analysis of misoprostol in the prevention of gastroduodenal (GD) ulcers in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 1995 Oslo
• Meta-Analysis of Non-Experimental Studies: A Review of Possible Applications in Environmental Health 1999 Rome
• Meta-analysis of non-randomized Indian trials confirming results of a Cochrane systematic review based on randomized trials 2014 Hyderabad
• Meta-analysis of observational studies: safety of home birth 1996 Adelaide
• Meta-analysis of ordinal outcome measures in stroke trials. Can we do better? 2011 Madrid
• Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes and application of minimal important differences to facilitate interpretation in systematic reviews and guideline development 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes and application of minimal important differences to facilitate interpretation in systematic reviews and guideline development 2018 Edinburgh
• Meta-analysis of proportions: a review and comparison of statistical methods for combining results from several binomial trials 2010 Keystone
• Meta-analysis of qualitative and quantitative study evidence 1999 Rome
• Meta-analysis of ROC curves 1997 Amsterdam
• Meta-analysis of Sequential Therapy with Amoxicillin plus Clavulanic Acid in the Treatment of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections 1999 Rome
• Meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy: a unified approach 2005 Melbourne
• Meta-analysis of systematic reviews of complex interventions: lessons/insights from complex interventions in heart failure 2006 Dublin
• Meta-analysis of the efficacy of NSAIDs for low-back pain 1996 Adelaide
• Meta-analysis of treatment by patient subgroup interactions using summary data: A case study and suggestions for future practice 2011 Madrid
• Meta-analysis: what is it all for? 2023 London
• Meta-analytical approaches for diagnostic and prognostic prediction research: Incorporating published univariable associations in multivariable analysis of individual patient data 2011 Madrid
• Meta-analyzing correlation coefficients derived from cohort studies 2015 Vienna
• Meta-analyzing surveillance studies to estimate the burden of vaccine-preventable infectious disease 2014 Hyderabad
• Meta-epidemiology of re-analyses of randomized controlled trial data 2015 Vienna
• Meta-ethnography reporting Guidance (eMERGe) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Meta-regression for complex questions that are not directly addressed in the available literature. 2000 Cape Town
• Meta-research evaluation of clinical trials of breastmilk substitutes 2020 Abstracts
• Metaanalysis of the perioperative prophylaxis of ceftriaxon versus other cepalosporins 1997 Amsterdam
• MetaDTA and MetaBayesDTA: Interactive web applications to conduct meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies 2023 London
• MetaDTA and MetaBayesDTA: interactive web applications to conduct meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• metaepi: an R package for conducting meta-epidemiologic studies 2015 Vienna
• MetaInsight and MetaCNMA: Interactive user-friendly “point and click” web application to conduct network meta-analysis and component network meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• MetaInsight: An interactive user-friendly “point and click” web application to conduct network meta-analysis 2023 London
• MetaInsight: an interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating and visualizing network meta-analyses 2018 Edinburgh
• MetaLight: freely available online software for teaching and learning meta-analysis 2013 Québec City
• metan: a comprehensive update to the popular user-written meta-analysis package for Stata 2023 London
• MetaPROM – Enhancing the interpretation of Meta-analyses of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures through a Microsoft Excel-based statistical software program 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analyses 2004 Ottawa
• Method and tools for implementing comparative effectiveness research: a Dutch example 2023 London
• Method for Assuring PICO(T) Completeness for Comprehensive Guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological adequacy of articles published in two open-access Brazilian cardiology periodicals 2011 Madrid
• Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological and reporting quality of indirect comparisons 2008 Freiburg
• Methodological and Reporting Quality of Meta-analyses in the Field of Screening 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological and Reporting Quality of Network Meta-analyses in the Field of Nutrition 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological and reporting quality of pharmacoepidemiology studies using the target trial emulation framework: a systematic review 2023 London
• Methodological and reporting quality of RCTs in social work: A cross-sectional survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological and reporting quality of search strategies of systematic reviews evaluating the therapeutic use of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogues. Meta-epidemiological study 2023 London
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dermatology: a cross-sectional study 2023 London
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on aesthetics and reconstructive breast surgery. A meta-research. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on influenza 2011 Madrid
• Methodological approaches for developing and reporting Living Evidence synthesis 2023 London
• Methodological aspects of a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathic treatment strategies 1997 Amsterdam
• Methodological aspects of randomized trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) concerning the treatment of suicide attempters 1997 Amsterdam
• Methodological assessment of cost-effectiveness studies of treatment with biologicals of severe asthma: a systematic review [MeCoBiA]. 2023 London
• Methodological challenges associated with network meta-analyses: The experience of the Musculoskeletal Group 2011 Madrid
• Methodological challenges encountered in undertaking an evidence and gap map of health and social care interventions in the ‘oldest old’ 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological challenges in a scoping review of adaptation to climate change 2019 Santiago
• Methodological challenges in conducting systematic reviews to increase the physical activity level of communities 2012 Auckland
• Methodological challenges in performing network meta-analyses using data from Cochrane intervention reviews: are data across reviews reliable and consistent? 2018 Edinburgh
• Methodological challenges in randomised trials of mHealth interventions: survey, expert workshop, and recommendations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: survey, expert workshop, and recommendations 2023 London
• Methodological challenges of the outcomes—reflections from a review of ICT-based prompting among patients with schizophrenia 2012 Auckland
• Methodological challenges regarding climate change and health in evidence-based medicine- Presentation of discussions from the german congress for EbM 2023 2023 London
• Methodological challenges to assess effectiveness of treatments with retrospective studies : the case of localized prostate cancer 2013 Québec City
• Methodological challenges when quantifying a mortality reduction with screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm when incidence is falling: a registry study 2016 Seoul
• Methodological characteristics of systematic reviews of prevalence 2018 Edinburgh
• Methodological compromises and their implications in a rapid review of qualitative evidence: A worked example 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological considerations for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies 2014 Hyderabad
• Methodological criteria for regulating orphan drugs for rare diseases: have EBM concepts been adopted? Zolgensma®’s case study. 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological developments and statistic software used in diagnostic systematic reviews in China 2011 Madrid
• Methodological difficulties in overview of reviews due to inconsistent reporting of outcomes: a case study of reviews on pharmacological treatments for asthma 2009 Singapore
• Methodological eligibility challenges in evidence synthesis of the prevalence of mental health problems in health care workers during COVID-19 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological evaluation of randomized controlled trials for Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese medical literature 2000 Cape Town
• Methodological Evaluation on Randomized Controlled Trials for Viral Hepatitis in Chinese Medical Literature 1999 Rome
• Methodological filters for the identification of delayed cross-sectional studies 2011 Madrid
• Methodological insights from a prognostic factor exemplar review: individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain 2015 Vienna
• Methodological issues from peer reviewed Chinese systematic reviews 2004 Ottawa
• Methodological issues in rehabilitation research: a scoping review 2019 Santiago
• Methodological issues in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies 2006 Dublin
• Methodological issues in using published incidence trends in a systematic review of overdiagnosis in mammography screening 2007 Sao Paulo
• Methodological issues on evidence review for public health intervention in Republic of Korea 2016 Seoul
• Methodological limitations in the trials of iron supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in children 2008 Freiburg
• Methodological overview: meta-analyses of adverse effects data from case-control studies as compared to other observational studies 2013 Québec City
• Methodological perspectives on a realist synthesis: An explanatory analysis of the effectiveness of female genital mutilation-cutting abandonment efforts 2011 Madrid
• Methodological quality and sample size of randomised trials published in 'Gastroenterology'. 2000 Cape Town
• Methodological quality and treatment effects in randomised trials: a review of six empirical studies 2004 Ottawa
• Methodological quality assessment of comparative test accuracy studies 2010 Keystone
• Methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of hyperthyroidism treatment 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of interventions on diabetic nephropathy 2013 Québec City
• Methodological quality assessment should move beyond design specificity 2023 London
• Methodological quality of accepted and rejected papers submitted to three leading biomedical journals 2004 Ottawa
• Methodological quality of clinical trials evaluated in early benefit assessment: orphan versus non-orphan drugs 2015 Vienna
• Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: What's missing in QUADAS 2010 Keystone
• Methodological quality of education meta-analyses: A meta-review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological quality of malaria RCTs conducted in Africa 2011 Madrid
• Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study 2016 Seoul
• Methodological quality of multiple treatments or network meta-analyses (MTAs) in type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological quality of negative versus positive studies 2014 Hyderabad
• Methodological Quality of Non-Randomized Intervention Studies 1999 Rome
• Methodological quality of practice guidelines produced by scientific society: a need for improvement? 1998 Baltimore
• Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in paediatric oncology published in 2001 and 2002 2004 Ottawa
• Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials of Chinese medicinal herbs for treating influenza 2005 Melbourne
• Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain 1995 Oslo
• Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain 1994 Hamilton
• Methodological quality of randomized controlled intervention trials of spinal disorders 2004 Ottawa
• Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials on gastric cancer treated with traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals 2011 Madrid
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on interventional in leading Chinese evidence-based medical journals 2013 Québec City
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic kidney disease 2016 Seoul
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in public health policy: one case of human resources 2015 Vienna
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in public health policy: one case of human resources 2014 Hyderabad
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches 2012 Auckland
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Alzheimer's disease treatments 2023 London
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine published in Chinese language between 2021-2022: a cross-sectional study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey 2023 London
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on physical exercise for breast cancer patients. Meta-epidemiological study. 2023 London
• Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Treatments for Osteoporosis: A Cross-sectional Study 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional study 2023 London
• Methodological quality, rigour, and transparency of systematic reviews: a review of reviews using an evidence gap map approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological requirements for searching for studies for Cochrane Reviews: an update on the MECIR standards 2013 Québec City
• Methodological requirements for searching for studies for Cochrane Reviews: ensuring that new Cochrane Reviews meet the MECIR standards 2014 Hyderabad
• Methodological review of items for assessing the risk of bias in network meta-analyses provides groundwork for the creation of an extension to the ROBIS tool 2020 Abstracts
• Methodological rigour of systematic reviews used to inform the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2023 London
• Methodological search filters to identify prognosis studies: A systematic review of development and evaluation studies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological strategies for the synthesis of complex interventions – oral health education programmes for nursing staff and residents 2015 Vienna
• Methodological strengths and limitations of the realist synthesis approach to systematic reviews—a promising methodology for the Cochrane Collaboration? 2012 Auckland
• Methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodological tasks of clinical practice guidelines developed in Japan 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodologies for critical appraisal of prevalence studies: a systematic review 2018 Edinburgh
• Methodology and quality of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2007 Sao Paulo
• Methodology and terminology used in evidence-informed guidelines in Oral Health: a systematic survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methodology Clinic 2006 Dublin
• Methodology for developing the Public Health Agency of Canada Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections Guidelines 2020 Abstracts
• Methodology of animal studies and impact on aggregating data: why meta-analyses might be inappropriate for preclinical studies 2013 Québec City
• Methodology of meta-analyses published in leading general and specialist journals, 1993 - 2002: bibliographic study 2006 Dublin
• Methodology of subgroup analyses used in individual patient data meta-analyses versus meta-analyses on published data 2005 Melbourne
• Methods and characteristics of network meta-analyses using diagnostic test accuracy studies 2020 Abstracts
• Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data 2015 Vienna
• Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review 2023 London
• Methods and processes for the production of Cochrane Rapid Reviews 2023 London
• Methods and statistics tutorials: an innovative approach to capacity building in evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods development for a new initiative - aerospace medicine systematic review group 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods for assess validity of diagnostic tests in rare diseases 2015 Vienna
• Methods for assessing the sustained use of research evidence in practice 2004 Ottawa
• Methods for Cochrane reviews of diagnostic test accuracy 2016 Seoul
• Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: an evidence map of the literature 2023 London
• Methods for configurational synthesis: extensions to traditional meta-analysis for addressing intervention complexity and contextual variation in reviews 2013 Québec City
• Methods for configurational synthesis: extensions to traditional meta-analysis for addressing intervention complexity and contextual variation in reviews 2013 Québec City
• Methods for Data Extraction and Data Transformation in Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSRs) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods for data extraction from figures in protocols of Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2015 Vienna
• Methods for developing software to support systematic review development: the JBI SUMARI example 2016 Seoul
• Methods for handling missing participant data in systematic reviews of dichotomous outcome data: a case example of plausible and extreme plausible assumptions 2012 Auckland
• Methods for identifying and displaying gaps in clinical research 2018 Edinburgh
• Methods for including non-randomised studies to answer questions about unintended harms of drugs 2012 Auckland
• Methods for including non-randomized studies in a network meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
• Methods for individual participant data meta-analysis of relative treatment effects: a methodologic overview 2015 Vienna
• Methods for measuring the patient's perspective in Evidence-based Medicine 2008 Freiburg
• Methods for synthesising qualitative data 2005 Melbourne
• Methods for synthesizing & integrating qualitative evidence 2008 Freiburg
• Methods for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods for the assessment of the effectiveness of treatment sequences for clinical and economic decision making 2013 Québec City
• Methods for the evaluation of the implementation of a rapid-recommendation on COVID-19 treatment 2020 Abstracts
• Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests 2012 Auckland
• Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a methodological survey 2020 Abstracts
• Methods of evidence mapping: a systematic review 2014 Hyderabad
• Methods of guideline adaptation: a review of guideline development guidance 2020 Abstracts
• Methods of identifying and displaying gaps in health research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods of mobilizing collective intelligence through crowdsourcing: a scoping review 2018 Edinburgh
• Methods of systematic reviews of prognosis: results of a 'Review of Reviews' 2007 Sao Paulo
• Methods to analyze continuous outcomes by incorporating baseline data in individual participant data meta-analysis of non-randomized studies 2019 Santiago
• Methods to enhance comprehensiveness of large Cochrane reviews: a practical example 2009 Singapore
• Methods to facilitate the interpretation of pooled diagnostic test accuracy estimates by means of selecting a representative pre-test probability 2018 Edinburgh
• Methods to improve the retention of participants in clinical trials: a methodological review 2019 Santiago
• Methods to involve medical students from developing countries in Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs): preliminary experiences from China 2004 Ottawa
• Methods to reduce reporting bias in Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
• Methods to synthesize evidence across trials reporting multiple behavioral outcomes 2010 Keystone
• Methods used for the conduct of rapid reviews on diagnostic tests: a scoping review 2019 Santiago
• Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Methods used in systematic reviews to conceptualise dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions: umbrella review 2023 London
• Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents: assessment of harmful effects in non-randomised studies 2016 Seoul
• Methylphenidate for improving academic performance in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – a systematic review of observational studies 2019 Santiago
• Methylxanthines for apnea of prematurity: is a broad systematic review needed? 2008 Freiburg
• Microsimulation-informed guideline: an example of lung cancer screening in China 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Minding the qualitative and feeling the width: identifying qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews 2005 Melbourne
• Minimal clinically important differences in acute pain 2011 Madrid
• Minimal clinically important differences in chronic pain 2012 Auckland
• Minimal important difference for the EQ-5D and impact on decision making in a clinical guideline 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Minimal important difference in meta-analyses: Applying anchor-based and distribution-based methods to increase precision 2011 Madrid
• Minimally important difference estimates and assessment of its credibility for patient reported outcomes in adults: a systematic survey 2015 Vienna
• Minimally important difference estimates and assessment of their credibility for patient-reported outcomes in adults: A systematic survey 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Minimally important difference estimates for patient reported outcomes in pediatrics: a systematic survey 2015 Vienna
• Minimising the impact of reporting bias by using data from clinical study reports for the determining the drop-out rates in antidepressant trials 2018 Edinburgh
• Mining the information overload: a scoping review of patients’ responses to different forms of health risk information 2015 Vienna
• Misinformation in COVID-19: nimble innovation within Cochrane to appraise the source 2023 London
• Misleading reporting in major fertility journals: poor use of confidence intervals and absolute differences 2015 Vienna
• Misleading results even after adjustment for a dozen covariates: a comparison between 'real world' analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in telecardiology 2018 Edinburgh
• Mismatch between health priorities and publicly funded clinical research: The Chilean case 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mismatch between overall and pairwise overlap analysis in a sample of overviews: A methodological review 2023 London
• Misrepresentation and overinterpretation of results in clinical studies evaluating biomarkers in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of ‘spin’ 2018 Edinburgh
• Missing and masked: equity in a systematic review of remote interventions for substance misuse. 2023 London
• Missing data in meta-analysis - a practical guide 2008 Freiburg
• Missing data in meta-analysis: a practical guide 2006 Dublin
• Missing Data in Systematic Reviews: A table might help 2010 Keystone
• Missing the wood for the trees: clinically relevant outcome measures in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation, a review of reviews 2015 Vienna
• Mixed method systematic review - an appropriate method for generating more knowledge about rare diseases? 2019 Santiago
• Mixed studies reviews: types of synthesis designs used to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence 2015 Vienna
• Mixed treatment comparison analysis of seven treatments for acute myocardial infarction 2005 Melbourne
• Mixed-methods synthesis for community-level public health interventions: Some considerations from a review of skin cancer prevention 2011 Madrid
• Mixing with the 'unclean’: Including non-Cochrane reviews alongside Cochrane reviews in overviews of reviews 2011 Madrid
• Mobile applications in the comprehensive management of acute and chronic complications of patients with diabetes: systematic review of the literature 2020 Abstracts
• Mobilizing the evidence synthesis community around planetary health: challenges and opportunities 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Model construction of Health Technology Reassessment (HTR) in Korea using systematic review of HTR systems in four countries 2014 Hyderabad
• Model-based network meta-analysis for time-course relationships: A union of two methodologies 2018 Edinburgh
• Modeling treatment effects on patient-important outcomes from surrogate markers in systematic reviews: the case of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B 2010 Keystone
• Modelling to assist knowledge translation of diagnostic test accuracy reviews (DTARs): a necessary evil? 2010 Keystone
• Moderate-term, low dose corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis 1998 Baltimore
• Modifiable factors influencing recruitment in clinical trials 2013 Québec City
• Modifications to the Risk of Bias tool: a case study of 204 trials 2011 Madrid
• Modified and true intention to treat analysis: reporting of methodologic quality of randomised controlled trials 2007 Sao Paulo
• Modified Intention to Treat: frequency, definition and implication for clinical trials 2007 Sao Paulo
• Money, support and guidance for reviewers 2006 Dublin
• Monitoring Process Barriers and Enablers towards Universal Health Coverage within the Sustainable Development Goals 2020 Abstracts
• Monte Carlo simulations: an objective tool to identify problematic randomization in Cochrane review 2020 Abstracts
• Monte Carlo simulations: an objective tool to identify problematic randomization in Cochrane Reviews 2019 Santiago
• Moral distress of hematology ward nurses at a university hospital in Japan: a best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• More good than harm: how well can Cochrane reviews help people decide? 1997 Amsterdam
• More knowledge is required. Stakeholder engagement and ownership in systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• More needle, less haystack – identifying ongoing trials with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry 2010 Keystone
• More than 30 nutritional studies assessed with ROBINS-I – lessons learned 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• More than a letter of invitation: Drawing on Digital Marketing strategy to engage stakeholders in evidence production 2020 Abstracts
• More than Expert Searchers! How librarians are positioned to improve quality and reduce waste through knowledge-synthesis service standards 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• More than expert searchers? A case study for librarians exploring roles beyond databases 2015 Vienna
• More than just a search: using past search strategies and search summary tables to improve future identification of implementation studies 2016 Seoul
• More work to find the needle in the growing haystack 2019 Santiago
• Mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic screening based on a population-based cohort study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Most accessed Cochrane reviews in The Cochrane Library and most accessed review abstracts on www.cochrane.org 2005 Melbourne
• Most health web sites are inaccessible, unusable and unreliable: a call for action 2005 Melbourne
• Most systematic reviews on medical education present critically low quality 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Motivational analysis of the health professionals in the usage of online evidence retrieval systems 2010 Keystone
• Move into the digital era - learn how to use RevMan on the Web 2019 Santiago
• Movement Precautions after Total Hip Replacement: a best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Moving from evidence to decisions when making recommendations in clinical practice guidelines guidance documents 2020 Abstracts
• Moving from evidence to implementation for childhood vaccination communication strategies: synthesising programme experience from low income countries 2013 Québec City
• Moving from insufficient evidence to recommendations: how can guideline development manuals improve to provide sufficient guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Moving from pilot to scale in refugee settings: An evidence-informed conceptual framework for the Humanitarian Education Accelerator 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Moving from research to practice: training students in translating and communicating evidence 2015 Vienna
• Moving from traditional to ‘streamlined’ systematic reviews in the Drug Effectiveness Review Project: assessment of impact on report usability 2015 Vienna
• Moving into the digital era - learn how to use RevMan on the Web (in Spanish) 2019 Santiago
• Moving knowledge into practice: Evaluating cross-cultural applicability of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Service (PARIHS) framework 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Moving toward a rigorous search filter in health promotion & public health 2004 Ottawa
• Moxibustion for the treatment of osteoarthritis: Second updated systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Mr. Pickwick and his child went on a field trip and returned empty handed: the widening gap between non-randomised studies and evidence for circadian rhythm sleep disorders management in a paediatric population 2011 Madrid
• Much ado about nothing: statistical methods for meta-analysis with rare events 1998 Baltimore
• Multi-Ethno-Linguistic Toolkit (MELT) for Inclusive Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews: Promoting Diversity and Inclusive Research Practices 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multi-faceted integration of information systems for tracking Uganda’s National Development Plan results and knowledge management 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multi-professional teaching of health research methodology in undergraduate programs. The case of Universidad de La Frontera in Chile 2015 Vienna
• Multi-Stakeholder Engagement in Evidence Synthesis 2023 London
• Multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development 2018 Edinburgh
• Multi-step evidence synthesis for policymaking processes: a novel methodology to inform large-scale health policies in Chile: The National Plan for Childhood Obesity 2019 Santiago
• Multidimensional graphical representation of treatment target population 1996 Adelaide
• Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation for Subacute Low Back Pain, Neck and Shoulder Pain, Repetitive Strain Injuries, Fibromyalgia and Multilocational Musculoskeletal Pains among Working Age Adults. A systematic review 1999 Rome
• Multilayered and multiformat dissemination of Cochrane reviews with the participation of Spanish consumers: the Cochrane Responde project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multilevel meta-analysis and qualitative meta-synthesis of a teacher classroom management programme: Cross-synthesising evidence for decision making 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multiple and discordant systematic reviews in medical literature: an epidemiological cross sectional study across medical fields 2009 Singapore
• Multiple imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE 2014 Hyderabad
• Multiple methods needed to ensure findings are relevant to stakeholders in a complex health systems review of lay health workers 2023 London
• Multiple publication bias in meditation research 2007 Sao Paulo
• Multiple statistical comparisons in systematic reviews: A quantification of the issue in reviews of anaesthesiological interventions 2010 Keystone
• Multiple strategy peer-taught evidence-based medicine course in a poor resource setting. 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multiple strategy peer-taught evidence-based medicine course in a poor-resource setting 2018 Edinburgh
• Multiple systematic reviews addressing the same topic – (when) is it a problem? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Multiple systematic reviews published on the same topic area: an analysis of systematic reviews that overlap in content 2014 Hyderabad
• Multiple treatment meta-analysis: application in ovarian cancer chemotherapy 2006 Dublin
• Multiple-arm trial data: using a corrected standard error for GIV analyses 2015 Vienna
• Multiple-treatments meta-analysis for categorical outcomes 2010 Keystone
• Multiple-treatments meta-analysis: challenges and opportunities 2008 Freiburg
• Multiplicity of data in trial reports creates an important challenge for the reliability of meta-analyses: an empirical study 2010 Keystone
• Multiplicity of data in trial reports: an important challenge for the reliability of meta-analyses 2009 Singapore
• Multiprofessional residency training in orthopedics and trauma: interprofessional collaboration and evidence-based practice as care improvement strategies 2019 Santiago
• Multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds per study 2011 Madrid
• Multivariate meta-analysis of multiple correlated outcomes with individual participant data: how much do we gain? 2015 Vienna
• Multivariate modelling for meta-epidemiological assessment of the association between trial quality and apparent treatment effects in randomised clinical trials 2004 Ottawa
• MUNI Healthy Minds: Birth, Implementation, and Benefits of an eHealth Mindfulness-Based Program in the Life of University Students 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Municipality-based Health Technology Assessment—a model guiding decision-making in the municipalities in Norway 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Musculoskeletal and pain research design and quality 2010 Keystone
• N-of-1 trials: a good tool to evaluate traditional Chinese medicines in cancer 2012 Auckland
• Narrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence: an analysis of tools and techniques 2004 Ottawa
• Narratives of evidence-based health care 2005 Melbourne
• National Cochrane systematic review training work­shops in China (2006-2008) 2009 Singapore
• National guideline and synthesis development within the National Institute for Quality and Excellence in Health (NIKEZ) in the Czech Republic 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• National guideline development - collaboration across nations 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• National guidelines for the specialised care of gender dysphoria in Sweden 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme - Gynaecological Cancer Review Group 2011 Madrid
• National priority setting of guideline development for chronic disease management in Korea 2014 Hyderabad
• National research priority dialogue for priority setting for systematic reviews on sexual and reproductive health in Nigeria 2019 Santiago
• National Standards for Home Care Services – using research to optimise implementation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• National Uptake of Health Research Priorities: Midterm review of research uptake using Cochrane Method in National Institutes of Health, Malaysia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Natural history of cervical dysplasia: a meta-analysis 1997 Amsterdam
• Natural language processing to increase efficiency of systematic reviews: a pilot study 2015 Vienna
• Natural language processor (NLP)-assisted screening in systematic reviews: assessment of two parallel-run classifiers to predict the exclusion of ineligible records 2019 Santiago
• Nature's shield: evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of eco-based disaster risk reduction in L&MICs 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating challenges: a system-level perspective on trustworthy guideline development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating colaborative evidence synthesis organizations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating equitable prioritization: strategic principles for evidence-limited domains 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating evidence frontiers: Latin American insights for collaborative evidence-informed decision making 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating the clinical study report (CSR): a road map to the data abstraction of CSRs for systematic reviews 2015 Vienna
• Navigating the clinical study report (CSR): a road map to the data abstraction of CSRs for systematic reviews 2016 Seoul
• Navigating The Cochrane Library 2012 Auckland
• Navigating the Cochrane Library 2015 Vienna
• Navigating The Cochrane Library 2014 Hyderabad
• Navigating The Cochrane Library 2008 Freiburg
• Navigating The Cochrane Library ***PARTICIPANTS: Please bring your laptops to this session 2013 Québec City
• Navigating the human-AI interface of evidence synthesis: the perception of artificial intelligence among evidence reviewers and information scientists 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating the path to trustworthy health guidelines: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Navigating the rough waters of knowledge translation (KT) research: effective search strategies for systematic reviews with a KT focus 2013 Québec City
• Navigating through challenges and achieving synthesis: building an effective cross-disciplinary team for evidence-informed decision-making 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• NCDDR s Web-based instruction on conducting systematic reviews of evidence-based disability and rehabilitation research 2010 Keystone
• Near-term or Intrapartum Care of Mothers For Perinatal and Newborn Outcomes 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Nedocromil sodium as treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a comparison of results from a meta-analysis with individual patient data 1998 Baltimore
• Need for a Core Outcome Set for Work Participation (COS-WP): a pilot review 2019 Santiago
• Needling Point Location Used in Sham Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Needs assessment on the use of systematic reviews in disaster settings: evidence aid 2012 Auckland
• Negative versus positive framing of health information messages 2010 Keystone
• Neglected tropical diseases: Are global policies based on reliable evidence? 2011 Madrid
• Neglected tropical diseases: What is happening in Africa? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Neonatal Systematic Reviews and their Effect on Clinical Practice in NSW (Australia) 1999 Rome
• Network meta-analyses in clinical guideline development for cutaneous Lyme borreliosis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Network meta-analyses in clinical practice guidelines: A cross-sectional survey 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Network meta-analyses in clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional survey 2015 Vienna