• Do benzodiazepines work? A meta-analysis ordeal
• Do Brazilian medical students use evidence?
• Do certain countries produce only positive results?
• Do clinical guidelines reduce the gap between evidence and practice? A before and after study of reported practice on EFM.
• Do Cochrane and non-Cochrane editors and authors prefer reporting statements based on statistically significant differences or do they prefer non-binary options?
• Do Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews report results integrating certainty of evidence and effect size?
• Do Cochrane overviews of reviews reflect upon factors related to health equity?
• Do Cochrane reviews drive clinical decision-making at the point of care?
• Do Cochrane Reviews evaluate healthcare interventions for immigrants and refugees?
• Do Cochrane reviews help policymakers in the Americas?: the use of reviews in EVIPNet Americas policy briefs
• Do Cochrane reviews influence guidelines for common acute respiratory infections?
• Do Cochrane reviews inform the development of clinical practice guidelines? The case of hypertension
• Do Cochrane Reviews measure enough of what patients want? A collaborative study of Cochrane Reviews on HIV/AIDS
• Do Cochrane reviews search databases of ongoing trials, and how well do they report these searches?
• Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews help decision makers from middle income countries? Update of the Chilean experience
• Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews help decision makers from middle income countries? Update of the Chilean experience
• Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews inform clinical practice guidelines in urology?
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews report patient-important outcomes?
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews report results integrating certainty of evidence and effect size?
• Do current Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) help decision makers from middle-income countries? The Chilean experience
• Do e-interventions for medication management in ambulatory care pose a threat to patient safety? A systematic review
• Do endorphins mediate placebo analgesia in humans? A systematic review
• Do evidence-based guidelines bridge the gaps in research?
• Do existing online research education tools meet the needs of the average consumer?
• Do guidelines reflect current best evidence? A comparison of guideline recommendations on rapid-acting insulin analogues and conclusions of a systematic review
• Do healthcare professionals and consumers prefer reporting statements based on statistically significant differences or do they prefer non-binary options?
• Do intellectual relationships create conflicts of interest?
• Do Language and culture influence how people interpret summaries of systematic reviews?
• Do multiple data sources about a single trial agree on risk of bias and PICO (participant, intervention, comparator, outcome) information?
• Do patient characteristics influence accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathol­ogy? An individual patient data meta-analysis
• Do patient decision aids improve patient adherence? Considering definitions and measures when interpreting systematic review findings
• Do problems in the conduct and reporting of Cochrane Reviews limit the reliability of clinical conclusions?
• Do prominent biomedical journals have methods for detecting outcome reporting bias? (survey of the top 30 journals by impact factor)
• Do prominent biomedical journals have methods for detecting outcome reporting bias? (survey of the top 30 journals by impact factor)
• Do province-wide access to The Cochrane Library and training sessions make a difference?
• Do registered dietitians search for evidence-based information? A nationwide survey of regional hospitals in Taiwan
• Do researchers consider the statistical significance and quality of reporting when deciding which articles to cite?
• Do reviewers and editors detect inadequate descriptions of treatments?
• Do systematic reviewers and clinical trialists in the same field consider similar outcomes to be important? A case study in HIV/AIDS
• Do systematic reviews really accurately use the risk of bias assessment to draw conclusions?
• Do systematic reviews within EPOC contain sufficient information about effect and enough information about the intervention to facilitate informed policy decision-making?
• Do textbooks encourage critical thinking about health issues? A discourse analysis of Polish educational materials for primary schools.
• Do the conclusions look as good as they seem? A review of quality improvement intervention studies
• Do the European clinical guidelines recommend evidence based interventions for drug addiction? A benchmark exercise
• Do the WHO criteria for going from evidence to recommendations need to be modified to better reflect complex multidisciplinary interventions?
• Do trialists endorse clinical trial registration? Survey of a PubMed sample
• Do value judgments play a role in evidence-based recommendations when information is based on proof of concept?
• Do variations in specific aspects of study design produce discrepancies in the benefits of effects in Cochrane intervention review?
• Do We Analyse Symptom Outcomes Correctly for Intervention Trials in Spontaneously Remitting Illnesses?
• Do we have Cochrane Reviews for the more relevant questions? Are they the best choice? Analysis of clinical questions in internal medicine
• Do we need a Bayes Collaboration? Proposal for a Diagnostic Database
• Do we need a PRISMA-Equity extension for systematic reviews?
• Do we need another systematic review if results from high-quality secondary literature already exist?
• Do we need comprehensive literature searches? A study Of publication and language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials.
• Do we need to consider in process citations for search strategies?
• Do's and Don'ts in the Rapid Review search: Find information faster without losing confidence in the results
• Documenting the search process: an update of different methods?
• Does ‘context’ influence the conclusions of equity-focused systematic reviews? A methodology study
• Does a Cochrane contributor facilitate the implementation of evidence-informed recommendations in practice
• Does a training in evidence based clinical psychology improve skills in evidence based clinical psychology?
• Does access to clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency reduce reporting bias?
• Does applicability make the difference? Two systematic reviews on the same topic
• Does blinding affect the results of meta-analyses?
• Does blood pressure response vary? An assessment using a systematic review of calcium channel blockers for primary hypertension
• Does Cochrane need more funding?
• Does editorial office data extraction support mean a better experience for review authors?
• Does focusing Embase subject headings improve search strategy efficiency?
• Does hierarchical meta-regression provide key insights for exploring the effectiveness of complex quality improvement interventions in diabetes?
• Does involvement in knowledge creation contribute to development of complex interventions? A realist review of involvement in diabetes research
• Does it matter which version of Medline you search?
• Does journal club membership improve research evidence uptake in allied health: a pre-post study
• Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines impact the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review
• Does level of experience matter when abstracting data for systematic reviews?
• Does location affect the publication of trial results presented at conferences? A case-study of African and North American HIV/AIDS trials
• Does one click access matter? Global use of The Cochrane Review: 2010 analysis
• Does patient expectation affect treatment outcomes? A preliminary investigation on expectations and outcomes
• Does presenting the findings of a review change public health decision-makers’ view on an intervention?
• Does psychiatric depression worsen cardiovascular outcome after myocardial infarction? A systematic review
• Does qualitative data on a research topic become saturated? Empirical observations from adherence to antiretroviral drugs in Africa
• Does registration will help systematic reviews to be published in journals indexed by Web of Science? A current investigation based on the PROSPERO platform
• Does screening automation negatively impact meta-analyses in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• Does Size Matter? - Maximum use of review manager
• Does St. John’s wort work better in German-speaking countries? A meta-regression analysis investigating the influence of country of origin on study results
• Does stratification analysis indicate the confounding factors in meta-analysis of observational studies?
• Does study quality matter in systematic reviews which include qualitative research?
• Does study quality matter in systematic reviews which include qualitative research?
• Does the inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation provide misleading results in meta‐analysis of single proportions?
• Does the language of publication of reports of randomized trials influence the estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
• Does the medium matter for educators' understanding of systematic reviews?
• Does the medium matter when getting the message?
• Does the message still reflect the evidence?
• Does the methodological quality of reviews of the effectiveness of strategies and programmes designed to alter behaviours in healthcare influence subsequent citation rates?
• Does the modified intention-to-treat reporting affect the estimate of the treatment effect in meta-analyses? A meta-epidemiological study
• Does The Non-Randomised Controlled Study Have a Place in the Systematic Review? A Pilot Study.
• Does the quality of antidepressant trials affect outcome estimates?
• Does the Schedule of an Intervention Differ weather it is Used as Experimental or Control? The Experience of The Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group
• Does the sensitivity of tests for Down Syndrome really decrease with maternal age? A case-study illustrating the potential impact of loss to follow up on review conclusions
• Does the STARD-statement improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies?
• Does the use of policies and procedures promote evidence-based nursing practice?
• Does tobacco smoking have some potential health benefits? An overview of systematic reviews
• Does trial registration reduce research bias? A comparison of registered and unregistered trials in diabetes quality improvement interventions
• Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis?
• Does type of sponsorship of randomized controlled trials influence treatment effect size estimates in rehabilitation: a meta-epidemiological study
• Does Vitamin A Supplementation Decrease Mortality in Patients With Measles?
• Domestic abuse risk assessment: evaluation of a new assessment tool for the police
• Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater: Are publishers’ requirement for searches to be ‘up-to-date’ penalising more complex and rigorous reviews?
• Donate your time as a Cochrane translator: introductory workshop for interested volunteers
• Donate your time as a Cochrane translator: introductory workshop for interested volunteers
• Drafting evidence-based recommendations in 10 days in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: methods and pitfalls
• Drawing conclusions from network meta-analysis
• Drawing conclusions from network meta-analysis
• Drivers and barriers to evidence-informed country-level health policy making: case study of a discussion in the HIFA virtual forum
• Driving the evidence-based healthcare agenda forward: a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of global health partnerships
• Drug dependence in Poland – consequences of undertreated pain in methadone maintenance programme
• Drug reviews should state industry-related bias in abstracts and plain language summaries
• Drug treatment for scabies
• Drug treatment on 680 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a view of evidence-based medicine
• Drug treatments for Discoid Lupus Erythematosus
• Drugs costs before and after bariatric surgery: A systematic review
• Dual monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews
• Dual uses of AGREE II: a tool for guideline evaluation and development
• Duplicate patterns and duplicate publication bias among Chinese-sponsored drug-related randomized controlled trials
• Duplicate Patterns, Bias, and Inconsistencies among Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
• DynaMed summaries and Cochrane Reviews: a dynamic collaboration!
• DynaMed summaries and Cochrane Reviews: a dynamic collaboration!
• Dynamic exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
• E-SCOPE: A Strategic Approach to Identify and Implement Cochrane and Other High-Quality Systematic Reviews in Learning Healthcare Systems
• Earlier Health Technology Assessment of Dying Patients' Therapy Baseline Reports
• Early evidence from meta-analyses of genetic risk factors is unreliable
• Early extreme contradictory estimates in published research
• Early weaning off of incubator humidification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): An evidence-utilisation project
• Easy access to information on evidence based mental health interventions for children in Norway: the website ‘Ungsinn’ (http://ungsinn.no)
• Easy ways to keep Cochrane reviews current: setting up automated email alerts
• EBM and research methodology education programs - how and when to teach: local experience at University of Valparaiso Medical School, Chile
• EBM education situation in China
• EBM Education/training in India: its effect on EBM related publications in Indian Medical Journals
• EBM on-line pilot course: from Brazil to El Salvador
• EBM+: evidence of mechanisms in evidence-based medicine
• EBPracticeNet Africa: a locally designed approach for evidence translation and implementation using freely available Cochrane Reviews
• EBRNetwork – a call to action for more (efficient) systematic reviews
• Echinocandin for the prevention of invasive candidiasis in patients with hematologic malignancies
• Ecological validity and usability of a critical-appraisal tool for qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies: researchers’ views and experiences
• Economic analyses are necessary to guide incorporation of new drugs to clinical practice in the treatment of breast cancer
• Economic evaluation of lung transplantation: results and implementation
• Economic evaluation of lung transplantation: results and implementation
• Economic evaluations in the intensive care literature: do they help us solve our financial problems?
• Economic evaluations of interventions for urinary incontinence and mapping the evidence gaps
• Economic evaluations of prenatal screening for trisomy 21: a systematic review of the methodogology
• Economic impact of an evidence based approach to tumor marker requests in a health plan in Brazil
• Economic impact of an evidence based assessment of bone densitometry in a private health plan in Brazil
• Economic Modelling Alongside a Systematic Review: Using Discrete Event Simulation to Model Dyspepsia Management Strategies.
• Economic support for Cochrane review authors: which is the magnitude of its effect?
• Economics and equity in health care: current perspectives and evidence
• Editing abstracts of Cochrane systematic reviews
• Editing podcast scripts for local reality
• Editorial policies and trial registration status for published trials in Indian medical journals
• Editorial policies of hematology and oncology journals: an analysis of author instructions
• Editorial policies of open access journals in pediatrics: survey of author instructions
• Editorial Policy and the Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Indian Medical Journals
• Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials in Indian medical journals in 2004–2005 versus 2007–2008
• Editorial policy in Cuban medical journals and the evidences production process: reality and perspectives
• Editorial processes - what exactly happens behind the scenes?
• Editorial processes and Archie for Managing Editors
• Editorial strategy for revising Cochrane reviews: does it help?
• Education and support for improving the evaluation of consumer participation in hospitals: content, process and research capacity
• Education and training Assessment of ‘Understanding evidence-based health care’: a foundation for action, an online course for consumer advocates
• Education and training for medical trainees and allied healthcare professionals: the use of online platforms
• Education and training issues Improving support and raising standards: a pilot induction and mentoring programme for new Review Group Co-ordinators in The Cochrane Collaboration
• Education efforts towards patients' knowledge and attitudes regarding clinical research: a mixed methods pilot study
• Educational Intervention Outcome Reporting Bias
• Educational models and their application in medical research training: A meta-analysis
• Educational strategies to build capacity in the generation and implementation of evidence in developing countries: the SEA-ORCHID Project
• Effect direction in synthesis without meta-analysis: application of Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2018 guidance
• Effect estimates can be accurately calculated with data digitally extracted from interrupted time series graphs
• Effect of allocation concealment and examiner masking on magnitude of clinical outcomes
• Effect of exercise training on reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Effect of health education on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV/AIDS patients in the southwest region of Cameroon
• Effect of involving undergraduates in EBM practices on improving their abilities
• Effect of length of follow-up on meta-analysis
• Effect of ondansetron in children with acute diarrhoeal illness and vomiting with some dehydration – a RCT in Kenyatta National Hospital
• Effect of Pacing Mode in Patients with Antibradycardia Pacing - a Meta-analysis after CTOPP Trial Does not End the Controversy
• Effect of palm oil on obesity
• Effect of taxes and subsidies on food: understanding the evidence
• Effect of teaching evidence-based medicine in medical postgraduates
• Effect of video demonstration on choice of epidural labour analgesia in a Nigerian tertiary hospital
• Effect sizes for continuous data: original metric versus standardized differences
• Effect sizes in child health and association with unreported outcomes
• Effect sizes reported in randomized and non-randomized controlled trials
• Effective collaboration between researchers and policy makers: examples from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Group
• Effective collaboration between the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Group and the World Health Organization
• Effective Methods Used In Community Sanitation And Hygiene Promotion In The Developing World: A Scoping Review
• Effective searching of LILACS database for systematic reviews
• Effective searching of the LILACS database for systematic reviews
• Effective searching of the LILACS database for systematic reviews
• Effective stakeholder engagement is beneficial to research – but HOW do you do it? Practical guidance and resources for authors, editors and researchers to support successful stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews
• Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain conditions: a rapid meta-synthesis of current best evidence within primary care
• Effectiveness and risk of pneumonia of ranitidine or sucralfate for the prophylaxis of stress ulcer in critical patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
• Effectiveness and safety of glucocorticoids to treat COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis
• Effectiveness of a brief course in evidence-based medicine for knowledge of the best sources of information in health care among health care workers: first results of the beginningofevidencebased medicine in the Amazonian region