• Disentangling the data: variations in data submissions from different players and their potential impact on a systematic review
• Disseminating and implementing practice guidelines: findings from the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy & Research
• Disseminating and implementing practice guidelines: findings from the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy & Research
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence in German via Instagram: Concept, channel performance and audience characteristics of our Insta channel “cochrane_deutschland”
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence to a wider audience through social media
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence to the public health workforce via author-led webinars
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence using context-specific methods: two case studies from Pakistan and the USA
• Disseminating Cochrane evidence with the leading social media on mobile phones in China
• Disseminating Cochrane findings to consumers through online, animated video summaries
• Disseminating evidence to health care practitioners on the Instagram: an ecological study.
• Disseminating good evidence for Cochrane Systematic Reviews: practice and experience from China
• Disseminating information on medicines and health interventions in Brazilian Portuguese using a internet-based resource: the Cemeds’ Blog
• Disseminating knowledge for evidence-based cancer care - National Knowledge Weeks
• Disseminating research findings to professional and lay audiences: a case study
• Disseminating research findings to professional and lay audiences: a case study
• Disseminating results of systematic reviews through a TV show in Brazil
• Disseminating scientifically sound, clinically relevant literature in the web era: the relevance and newsworthiness of Cochrane reviews
• Disseminating the Findings of Research: The NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Experience
• Disseminating the findings of systematic reviews: the CRD approach
• Dissemination and implementation of the WHO Abortion care guideline
• Dissemination and implementation science from the US National Institutes of Health
• Dissemination and Implementation Science Specialist Program: guideline development and adaptation for pediatric oncology in sub-Saharan Africa
• Dissemination and the evidence for measles vaccination in the world.
• Dissemination and use of research evidence for policy and practice: a framework for developing, implementing and evaluating strategies
• Dissemination bias in qualitative research: what is it and how can it be assessed?
• Dissemination efforts to optimize service delivery to children, adolescents, and their families – How systematic reviews (SRs) can be utilized
• Dissemination evidence by journals: making the medical journals as readable, reliable and accessible information resource for consumers
• Dissemination mechanisms of Clinical Practice Guidelines – Mixed methods evidence synthesis
• Dissemination Model Emphasizes Multi-faceted Approach
• Dissemination of Cochrane Public Health evidence with targeted stakeholder messages using an email marketing service
• Dissemination of Cochrane Reviews in social media channels and the influence of ‘positive’ versus ‘negative’ results
• Dissemination of effective physiotherapy treatments - analysing the relevance and usefulness of a large database of evidence summaries
• Dissemination of evidence-based health care in Brazil: use of television programme
• Dissemination of Evidence-Based Medicine by Taiwan Evidence-Based Medicine Association
• Dissemination Of information about ongoing clinical trials: Can we find a better approach?
• Dissemination of knowledge about health search strategies for journalists in Brazil
• Dissemination of knowledge translation products via WeChat in China: facilitators and barriers
• Dissemination of randomized controlled trials in oncology during 1999-2003 in Spain
• Dissemination of systematic reviews in hospital setting: a comparative survey for diffusing the Cochrane Library
• Dissemination of the Cochrane Reviews: A national survey among the regional hospitals in Taiwan
• Distal pancreatectomy: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques
• Distance education for evidence-based health hospital managers: partnership between Hospital Sírio Libanês and National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA)
• Distraction from randomisation in diagnostic research
• Disturbing evidence
• Diverse perspectives from regulatory agencies in Latin America concerning platelet-rich plasm production and use
• Diversity around the effects of platelet-rich plasma for medical conditions
• Diversity in Cochrane Reviews Authorship: A Meta-Research Study
  
• Diversity in communicating Cochrane evidence to diverse Russian-speaking audiences
• Diversity in perspective and method: how the inclusion of qualitative evidence is enhancing Cochrane Reviews
• Diversity in reviewers: diverse researcher perspectives in systematic reviews may help to reduce potential researcher bias and improve reporting
• Diversity in the use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in systematic reviews: a typology of approaches
• Diversity of scale and context of implemented learning healthcare systems: A narrative literature review
• Diversity of sex and country of origin among Cochrane authors
• Diving deep into evidence: the role of hyperbaric medicine within evidence-based medicine
• DNAR? Do Not Attempt Resuscitation or Do Not Attempt Review?
• Do antidepressants work in depression in physical illness?
• Do basket clinical trials in oncology increase health benefits for patients?
• Do benzodiazepines work? A meta-analysis ordeal
• Do Brazilian medical students use evidence?
• Do certain countries produce only positive results?
• Do clinical guidelines reduce the gap between evidence and practice? A before and after study of reported practice on EFM.
• Do Cochrane and non-Cochrane editors and authors prefer reporting statements based on statistically significant differences or do they prefer non-binary options?
• Do Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews report results integrating certainty of evidence and effect size?
• Do Cochrane overviews of reviews reflect upon factors related to health equity?
• Do Cochrane reviews drive clinical decision-making at the point of care?
• Do Cochrane Reviews evaluate healthcare interventions for immigrants and refugees?
• Do Cochrane reviews help policymakers in the Americas?: the use of reviews in EVIPNet Americas policy briefs
• Do Cochrane reviews influence guidelines for common acute respiratory infections?
• Do Cochrane reviews inform the development of clinical practice guidelines? The case of hypertension
• Do Cochrane Reviews measure enough of what patients want? A collaborative study of Cochrane Reviews on HIV/AIDS
• Do Cochrane reviews search databases of ongoing trials, and how well do they report these searches?
• Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews help decision makers from middle income countries? Update of the Chilean experience
• Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews help decision makers from middle income countries? Update of the Chilean experience
• Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews inform clinical practice guidelines in urology?
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews report patient-important outcomes?
• Do Cochrane systematic reviews report results integrating certainty of evidence and effect size?
• Do current Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) help decision makers from middle-income countries? The Chilean experience
• Do e-interventions for medication management in ambulatory care pose a threat to patient safety? A systematic review
• Do endorphins mediate placebo analgesia in humans? A systematic review
• Do evidence-based guidelines bridge the gaps in research?
• Do existing online research education tools meet the needs of the average consumer?
• Do free school lunch program improve nutritional status and academic outcomes among children in India? A systematic review
• Do guidelines reflect current best evidence? A comparison of guideline recommendations on rapid-acting insulin analogues and conclusions of a systematic review
• Do healthcare professionals and consumers prefer reporting statements based on statistically significant differences or do they prefer non-binary options?
• Do intellectual relationships create conflicts of interest?
• Do Language and culture influence how people interpret summaries of systematic reviews?
• Do multiple data sources about a single trial agree on risk of bias and PICO (participant, intervention, comparator, outcome) information?
• Do patient characteristics influence accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathol­ogy? An individual patient data meta-analysis
• Do patient decision aids improve patient adherence? Considering definitions and measures when interpreting systematic review findings
• Do problems in the conduct and reporting of Cochrane Reviews limit the reliability of clinical conclusions?
• Do prominent biomedical journals have methods for detecting outcome reporting bias? (survey of the top 30 journals by impact factor)
• Do prominent biomedical journals have methods for detecting outcome reporting bias? (survey of the top 30 journals by impact factor)
• Do province-wide access to The Cochrane Library and training sessions make a difference?
• Do registered dietitians search for evidence-based information? A nationwide survey of regional hospitals in Taiwan
• Do researchers consider the statistical significance and quality of reporting when deciding which articles to cite?
• Do reviewers and editors detect inadequate descriptions of treatments?
• Do systematic reviewers and clinical trialists in the same field consider similar outcomes to be important? A case study in HIV/AIDS
• Do systematic reviews really accurately use the risk of bias assessment to draw conclusions?
• Do systematic reviews within EPOC contain sufficient information about effect and enough information about the intervention to facilitate informed policy decision-making?
• Do textbooks encourage critical thinking about health issues? A discourse analysis of Polish educational materials for primary schools.
• Do the conclusions look as good as they seem? A review of quality improvement intervention studies
• Do the European clinical guidelines recommend evidence based interventions for drug addiction? A benchmark exercise
• Do the WHO criteria for going from evidence to recommendations need to be modified to better reflect complex multidisciplinary interventions?
• Do trialists endorse clinical trial registration? Survey of a PubMed sample
• Do value judgments play a role in evidence-based recommendations when information is based on proof of concept?
• Do variations in specific aspects of study design produce discrepancies in the benefits of effects in Cochrane intervention review?
• Do we adequately consider conflicts of interest (COIs) in health care organizations?
• Do We Analyse Symptom Outcomes Correctly for Intervention Trials in Spontaneously Remitting Illnesses?
• Do we have Cochrane Reviews for the more relevant questions? Are they the best choice? Analysis of clinical questions in internal medicine
• Do we need a Bayes Collaboration? Proposal for a Diagnostic Database
• Do we need a PRISMA-Equity extension for systematic reviews?
• Do we need another systematic review if results from high-quality secondary literature already exist?
• Do we need comprehensive literature searches? A study Of publication and language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials.
• Do we need to consider in process citations for search strategies?
• Do's and Don'ts in the Rapid Review search: Find information faster without losing confidence in the results
• Documenting the search process: an update of different methods?
• Does ‘context’ influence the conclusions of equity-focused systematic reviews? A methodology study
• Does a Cochrane contributor facilitate the implementation of evidence-informed recommendations in practice
• Does a training in evidence based clinical psychology improve skills in evidence based clinical psychology?
• Does access to clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency reduce reporting bias?
• Does applicability make the difference? Two systematic reviews on the same topic
• Does blinding affect the results of meta-analyses?
• Does blood pressure response vary? An assessment using a systematic review of calcium channel blockers for primary hypertension
• Does Cochrane need more funding?
• Does editorial office data extraction support mean a better experience for review authors?
• Does expedited regulatory approval predict the therapeutic value of drugs? A systematic review
• Does focusing Embase subject headings improve search strategy efficiency?
• Does hierarchical meta-regression provide key insights for exploring the effectiveness of complex quality improvement interventions in diabetes?
• Does involvement in knowledge creation contribute to development of complex interventions? A realist review of involvement in diabetes research
• Does it matter which version of Medline you search?
• Does journal club membership improve research evidence uptake in allied health: a pre-post study
• Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines impact the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review
• Does level of experience matter when abstracting data for systematic reviews?
• Does local research on type 2 diabetes address relevant questions of interventions in Chile? A 20 years assessment
• Does location affect the publication of trial results presented at conferences? A case-study of African and North American HIV/AIDS trials
• Does one click access matter? Global use of The Cochrane Review: 2010 analysis
• Does one size fit all – unified tools for assessing the methodological quality within rapid reviews of intervention effects
  
• Does patient expectation affect treatment outcomes? A preliminary investigation on expectations and outcomes
• Does presenting the findings of a review change public health decision-makers’ view on an intervention?
• Does psychiatric depression worsen cardiovascular outcome after myocardial infarction? A systematic review
• Does qualitative data on a research topic become saturated? Empirical observations from adherence to antiretroviral drugs in Africa
• Does registration will help systematic reviews to be published in journals indexed by Web of Science? A current investigation based on the PROSPERO platform
• Does screening automation negatively impact meta-analyses in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• Does Size Matter? - Maximum use of review manager
• Does St. John’s wort work better in German-speaking countries? A meta-regression analysis investigating the influence of country of origin on study results
• Does stratification analysis indicate the confounding factors in meta-analysis of observational studies?
• Does study quality matter in systematic reviews which include qualitative research?
• Does study quality matter in systematic reviews which include qualitative research?
• Does the inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation provide misleading results in meta‐analysis of single proportions?
• Does the language of publication of reports of randomized trials influence the estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
• Does the medium matter for educators' understanding of systematic reviews?
• Does the medium matter when getting the message?
• Does the message still reflect the evidence?
• Does the methodological quality of reviews of the effectiveness of strategies and programmes designed to alter behaviours in healthcare influence subsequent citation rates?
• Does the modified intention-to-treat reporting affect the estimate of the treatment effect in meta-analyses? A meta-epidemiological study
• Does The Non-Randomised Controlled Study Have a Place in the Systematic Review? A Pilot Study.
• Does the quality of antidepressant trials affect outcome estimates?
• Does the Schedule of an Intervention Differ weather it is Used as Experimental or Control? The Experience of The Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group
• Does the sensitivity of tests for Down Syndrome really decrease with maternal age? A case-study illustrating the potential impact of loss to follow up on review conclusions
• Does the STARD-statement improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies?
• Does the use of policies and procedures promote evidence-based nursing practice?
• Does tobacco smoking have some potential health benefits? An overview of systematic reviews
• Does trial registration reduce research bias? A comparison of registered and unregistered trials in diabetes quality improvement interventions
• Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis?
• Does type of sponsorship of randomized controlled trials influence treatment effect size estimates in rehabilitation: a meta-epidemiological study
• Does Vitamin A Supplementation Decrease Mortality in Patients With Measles?
• Domestic abuse risk assessment: evaluation of a new assessment tool for the police
• Don't teach critical appraisal! Preliminary results of a reformulation of an Evidence-Based Medicine Undergraduate Course.
  
• Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater: Are publishers’ requirement for searches to be ‘up-to-date’ penalising more complex and rigorous reviews?
• Donate your time as a Cochrane translator: introductory workshop for interested volunteers
• Donate your time as a Cochrane translator: introductory workshop for interested volunteers
• Drafting evidence-based recommendations in 10 days in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: methods and pitfalls
• Drawing conclusions from network meta-analysis
• Drawing conclusions from network meta-analysis
• Drivers and barriers to evidence-informed country-level health policy making: case study of a discussion in the HIFA virtual forum
• Driving the evidence-based healthcare agenda forward: a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of global health partnerships
• Drug dependence in Poland – consequences of undertreated pain in methadone maintenance programme
• Drug reviews should state industry-related bias in abstracts and plain language summaries
• Drug treatment for scabies
• Drug treatment on 680 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a view of evidence-based medicine
• Drug treatments for Discoid Lupus Erythematosus
• Drugs costs before and after bariatric surgery: A systematic review
• Dual monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews
• Dual uses of AGREE II: a tool for guideline evaluation and development
• Duplicate patterns and duplicate publication bias among Chinese-sponsored drug-related randomized controlled trials
• Duplicate Patterns, Bias, and Inconsistencies among Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
• DynaMed summaries and Cochrane Reviews: a dynamic collaboration!
• DynaMed summaries and Cochrane Reviews: a dynamic collaboration!
• Dynamic exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
• e-HEALTH RECORD WARNINGS FOR TRANSLATION OF COCHRANE EVIDENCE ON VITAMIN D TESTING
  
• E-SCOPE: A Strategic Approach to Identify and Implement Cochrane and Other High-Quality Systematic Reviews in Learning Healthcare Systems
• E-SCOPE: a strategy for knowledge translation and implementation of systematic reviews within a large healthcare delivery organization
  
• Earlier Health Technology Assessment of Dying Patients' Therapy Baseline Reports
• Early evidence from meta-analyses of genetic risk factors is unreliable
• Early extreme contradictory estimates in published research
• Early weaning off of incubator humidification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): An evidence-utilisation project
• Easy access to information on evidence based mental health interventions for children in Norway: the website ‘Ungsinn’ (http://ungsinn.no)
• Easy ways to keep Cochrane reviews current: setting up automated email alerts
• EBM and research methodology education programs - how and when to teach: local experience at University of Valparaiso Medical School, Chile