Index

Reducing Bias and Increasing Power by Imputing Missing Standard Deviations for Continuous Outcomes in Systematic Reviews 2002 Stavanger
Reducing duplication: an example of collaboration between guideline developers and Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups 2005 Melbourne
Reducing labour and time in creating a systematic review for Japanese rehabilitation nutrition guideline by using artificial intelligence and social networks 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reducing unnecessary cervical cancer screening: achieving more by doing less 2013 Québec City
Reducing Waiting Children with Daycare Search Map: Evidence from an RCT in Shibuya City 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reduction in use of human albumin: Who mediated the change in response to what? 1999 Rome
Redundancy of Systematic Reviews of Stem Cell Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Redundant Clinical Trials Challenging Research Ethics and Hurting Patients 2020 Abstracts
Redundant trials: do researchers register clinical trials for outcomes that have a 'high' GRADE evidence rating? 2019 Santiago
Reference-based and study-based registers: some answers? more questions? 2007 Sao Paulo
Refinement of search filters to reduce information overload when retrieving evidence on variations in practice for NICE Quality Standards 2015 Vienna
Reflecting on knowledge mobilization strategies used for the eCOVID-19 Recommendations Map & Gateway to Contextualization: a deliberative dialogue 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reflections on embedding patient and consumer involvement in the PaReNt project 2018 Edinburgh
Reflections on stakeholder engagement in a systematic review of effectiveness: integrating the voice of healthcare users 2018 Edinburgh
Reflections on the use of a novel framework synthesis approach to complete a rapid review of qualitative evidence 2018 Edinburgh
RefTraK - The Cochrane Stroke Group's Specialised Register Management System: A Powerful Tool for Supporting Reviewers 1999 Rome
Refugee crisis in health and society 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Regional Review Group Co-ordinator - a way to recruit and support reviewers to get reviews done? 2000 Cape Town
Register & handsearch submissions for CENTRAL: all you need is trials! 2008 Freiburg
Registered paediatric trials worldwide: frequency, location and focus 2013 Québec City
Registered trials of traditional Chinese medicine in China: current status and issues 2014 Hyderabad
Registration of randomized controlled trials published in PubMed indexed journals: a cross-sectional analysis 2014 Hyderabad
Registry of medical and technological documents as a database of evidence-based medicine in Ukraine (Registry of MTD) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Registry-based observational studies of the management and outcome of cancer: a new way to look at old problems 1996 Adelaide
Regulatory and road-engineering interventions for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities among vulnerable road users in low- and middle-income countries 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
REH-COVER (Rehabilitation – COVID-19 Evidence-based Response) action: a “rapid” and “living” systematic review methodology 2023 London
Rehabilitation and Cochrane: A difficult relationship 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rehabilitation and cross-over design: an evaluation on Medline and Embase 1997 Amsterdam
Rehabilitation for chest trauma patients with intra-pleural abnormalities managed with tube thoracostomy – A Systematic Review. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rehabilitation in Africa - Building capacity in clinical practice guidelines development and use 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials for low back pain: are they statistically significant and clinically relevant? 2018 Edinburgh
Rehabilitation practitioners' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines for stroke managment when working in rural primary care in South Africa 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Relationship between collected and published outcomes: a case of IPD meta-analysis on the effect of diet and lifestyle in pregnancy 2016 Seoul
Relationship between gastrointestinal infections and ethnicity in the UK: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Relationship between global burden of disease and quantity of published randomized controlled trials 2014 Hyderabad
Relationship between the description of primary outcomes and significance of the results in trials with diet and lifestyle in pregnancy 2016 Seoul
Relative paucity of high-quality or moderate-quality evidence to inform World Health Organization guidelines on antiretroviral therapy 2013 Québec City
Relatively absolute (one size may not fit all) 2006 Dublin
Relevance In action: how can Cochrane reviews meet consumers' needs? 1999 Rome
Reliability and applicability of RoB 2: experience within the pilot review “Cannabis and cannabinoids for people with multiple sclerosis” 2020 Abstracts
Reliability and applicability of the revised Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) 2019 Santiago
Reliability and feasibility of the Health Evidence™ quality assessment tool for systematic reviews on the effectiveness of public health interventions 2020 Abstracts
Reliability and validity assessment of a risk-of-bias instrument for non-randomised studies of exposures 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reliability and validity of instruments measuring research utilization in health care 2009 Singapore
Reliability and validity of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale 2012 Auckland
Reliability of a Scale for Measuring the Methodological Quality of Clinical Trials 1999 Rome
Reliability of data extraction using manual measurements of published graphs or figures 2015 Vienna
Reliability of estimating odds ratios of response and the corresponding standard errors from continuous rating scale scores for meta-analysis: a case study in trials on depression treatment 2014 Hyderabad
Reliability of risk of bias assessments between pairs of reviewers from different centers and reasons for disagreement 2012 Auckland
Reliably estimating interactions and subgroup effects in aggregate data meta-analysis 2023 London
Relocating a Cochrane entity: the United States Cochrane Center experience 2006 Dublin
REMARK Profile Study: reporting of participant flow and events in prognostic studies of tumour markers 2007 Sao Paulo
Remote development of a localised package of care to support primary healthcare clinicians in Nigeria: A case study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Renal adverse effects from cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatories: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Repeated measures meta-analysis of clinical trials 1998 Baltimore
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2020 Abstracts
Replacing Exercise electrocardiography with Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease - Relevant Advancement or Risk of Overdiagnosis? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Replication and contradiction of highly cited research papers in psychiatry: 10-year follow-up 2014 Hyderabad
Replies to pharmacotherapeutic queries from an HTA centre and a drug information centre ‒ a comparative analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Report on the ‘pre’ and ‘post’ peer review questionnaire on ‘assessment and treatment of gonarthrosis’ 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Report on The Cochrane Empty Review Project Consensus Meeting: A proposal of empty review reporting guidelines and an invitation for feedback 2011 Madrid
Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts are not associated with full-text publication 2016 Seoul
Reported use and perceptions of value of Cochrane evidence by South African guideline developers 2015 Vienna
Reported versus actual analytical methods to handle missing participant data in meta-analysis: a survey of 100 systematic reviews 2015 Vienna
Reporting absolute estimates of effect and certainty of evidence when conducting an umbrella review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting adverse events in reviews and the PRISMA Harms 2015 Vienna
Reporting and analysis of missing participant continuous data in randomized controlled trials (LOST-IT-II): a systematic survey 2015 Vienna
Reporting and application of minimally important differences in randomized controlled trials evaluating patient reported outcomes: a systematic survey 2016 Seoul
Reporting and methodological quality assessment of guideline for rare diseases 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture therapy: an evidence mapping of 146 Network Meta-analyses 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature 2012 Auckland
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions published in Chinese surgical journals 2013 Québec City
Reporting and methods in systematic reviews of comparative accuracy 2013 Québec City
Reporting bias and aripiprazole for schizophrenia: new data from unpublished studies 2016 Seoul
Reporting bias in clinical trials 2007 Sao Paulo
Reporting Bias in Imaging Diagnostic Accuracy Research: Update on Recent Evidence 2020 Abstracts
Reporting bias in imaging diagnostic accuracy studies: Are studies with positive conclusions or titles submitted and published faster? 2020 Abstracts
Reporting bias in imaging research: association of diagnostic accuracy estimates in radiology conference abstracts with full-text publication 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting bias in industry-sponsored spinal fusion studies of recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) 2013 Québec City
Reporting bias: higher diagnostic accuracy is linked to faster publication in imaging research 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting characteristics and quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture analgesia 2016 Seoul
Reporting characteristics of Cochrane Reviews on health policy research 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting characteristics of health policy briefs: a cross-sectional study of briefs in HSE and WHO databases 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting Characteristics of Health Policy Briefs：A cross-sectional study 2020 Abstracts
Reporting Characteristics of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systematic Reviews 2020 Abstracts
Reporting gap of randomized clinical trials registered in Western Mexico, a cross-sectional study 2023 London
Reporting guidelines for qualitative and mixed-method syntheses: contemporary and novel developments 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting guidelines for reporting searches of network meta-analysis are needed 2013 Québec City
Reporting guidelines for systematic review protocols 2011 Madrid
Reporting health related quality of life in critical care RCTs 2015 Vienna
Reporting heterogeneity in meta-analysis: understanding Cochrane's shift from I-squared to prediction intervals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting items for ChatGPT and other similar cHatbots usEd in mEdical Research: CHEER statement 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) 2016 Seoul
Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA-A statement 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a review 2013 Québec City
Reporting missing outcome data for participants in randomized trials: a methodological survey of proposed approaches 2014 Hyderabad
Reporting of absolute estimates of effect of patient important benefits and harms in abstracts of systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews 2006 Dublin
Reporting of clinical prediction model studies in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for Abstracts 2016 Seoul
Reporting of Cochrane Systematic Review protocols with network meta-analyses – a scoping review 2019 Santiago
Reporting of conflicts of interest in Cochrane reviews of trials of pharmacological treatments 2011 Madrid
Reporting of Drug Trial Funding Sources and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane Meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
Reporting of effect direction and size in abstracts of systematic reviews 2011 Madrid
Reporting of eligibility criteria of participants in randomized trials: comparison between study protocols and journal articles 2009 Singapore
Reporting of essential items in comparative accuracy studies: A literature review 2020 Abstracts
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of 200 Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a methodological survey 2016 Seoul
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of 200 randomized controlled trials: a methodological survey 2016 Seoul
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of health policy and systems systematic reviews: a methodological survey 2016 Seoul
Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments 2005 Melbourne
Reporting of harms in clinical trials: overview of the adherence to CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Harms 2004 2019 Santiago
Reporting of harms in randomized trials of mental health interventions 2004 Ottawa
Reporting of industry-funded trial outcome data: a comparison of journal publications with confidential individual patient data and clinical study reports 2013 Québec City
Reporting of information retrieval in Campbell Systematic Reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting of interim analyses, stopping rules, and data safety and monitoring boards in protocols and publications of discontinued randomized trials 2013 Québec City
Reporting of intervention fidelity in systematic reviews of asthma education 2015 Vienna
Reporting of interventions: a comparative case study before and after the publication of the extended CONSORT guidelines for reporting non-pharmacological trials 2015 Vienna
Reporting of ITT analysis in reproductive studies 2020 Abstracts
Reporting of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of screening tests in China 2011 Madrid
Reporting of missing data and protocol deviation in the description of intention to treat is inconsistent in randomized controlled trials. 2010 Keystone
Reporting of non-pharmacological treatment interventions: an extension of the CONSORT statement 2007 Sao Paulo
Reporting of outcomes in systematic reviews: comparison of protocols and published systematic reviews 2007 Sao Paulo
Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials 2011 Madrid
Reporting of perinatal mortality and its components in Cochrane reviews: still room for improvement? 2014 Hyderabad
Reporting of randomisation in randomised-controlled trials on traditional Chinese medicine: A comparison of three Chinese medicine journals 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting of randomized clinical trials discontinued due to poor recruitment: a literature review 2014 Hyderabad
Reporting of Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) in Cochrane protocols and reviews 2023 London
Reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) framework in clinical research on prognosis for severe Dengue 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting of systematic reviews that synthesize studies of prevalence: Assessment of 1150 reviews using the PRISMA 2009 guideline 2023 London
Reporting of the certainty of evidence through GRADE in systematic reviews in dentistry indexed during late 2019 - late 2020 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting of the role of the expert searcher in Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
Reporting of the Search for Studies, the Format of Study Identifiers, and the Format of References in Cochrane Reviews 2002 Stavanger
Reporting of updating process in updated clinical guidelines: A systematic assessment 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting on heath-related quality of life in Cochrane reviews - a challenge for authors? 2007 Sao Paulo
Reporting on the quality of randomised controlled trials in prehospital care 2005 Melbourne
Reporting quality and its influencing factors in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer 2019 Santiago
Reporting quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of ultraprocessed foods: a methodological study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on gastric cancer 2018 Edinburgh
Reporting quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on pancreatic cancer 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting quality evaluation of climate change guidelines with RIGHT checklist 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting quality of case series using computer tomography in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 2020 Abstracts
Reporting quality of continuous quality-improvement studies in the nursing field published in China 2019 Santiago
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of botanical medicines 2004 Ottawa
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on gastric cancer treated with traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals 2011 Madrid
Reporting quality of titles and abstract in retrospective database studies assessing drug effects 2020 Abstracts
Reporting standard for qualitative research: A good or a bad idea? Preliminary results from a Delphi study 2011 Madrid
Reporting standards research on health economic assessment in clinical practice guideline recommendations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting the GRADE approach by systematic reviews of interventions in pediatric dentistry: methodological study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reporting the Number Needed to Treat (NNT): a systematic review of randomized controlled trials where the outcome is time to an event 2007 Sao Paulo
Reporting, dealing with, and judging risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey 2013 Québec City
Reporting, dealing with, and judging risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey 2013 Québec City
Reporting, handling, and judging risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
Reports of controlled trials from EMBASE: an important contribution to The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 1998 Baltimore
Reports on animal experiments involving neoplasms in Chinese Journals: adherence to ARRIVE guidelines 2015 Vienna
Representation of older adults, women, and ethnic minorities in published randomized trials of drug therapy for type 2 diabetes 2009 Singapore
Representation of patients in receipt of disability benefits among trials of therapy for fibromyalgia 2015 Vienna
Reproducibility in Systematic Reviews used to Inform Clinical Practice Guidelines 2023 London
Reproducibility of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) factors on the strength of recommendations: an empirical assessment 2015 Vienna
Reproducibility of meta-analytic results in systematic reviews of interventions: a meta-research study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
Repurposing Cochrane reviews for a community health information project in Sierra Leone: Malaria prevention 2008 Freiburg
Requirements of the core clinical journals for authors’ disclosure of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross sectional study 2014 Hyderabad
Research activities of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in China: a survey of the accepted abstracts of the Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on EBM 2015 Vienna
Research capacity building for Chinese medical practitioners in China: a questionnaire survey 2015 Vienna
Research Implications From Cochrane Reviews - what happens to them? 1999 Rome
Research integrity and predatory publishing in evidence reviews: an introduction to the RIPPER Working Group 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research integrity in living guidelines for pregnancy and postnatal care 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research integrity in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review of prevalence of poor authorship practice, plagiarism and other misconduct 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Research issues in the evaluation and design of interventions to improve outcomes for patients with multimorbidity 2013 Québec City
Research methods for systematic review of the burden of disease: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
RESEARCH NEEDS AND ENGAGEMENT OF REHABILITATION PROFESSIONALS PRACTISING IN AFRICA: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research networks, are they worth the effort? Experiences of establishing and running an evidence-synthesis network in northwest England 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Research on simulation-based training in radiography: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research on the development methodology for clinical practice guidelines for organic integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research on the influencing factors and enhancement strategies of public health awareness among college students in the post epidemic era 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research priority setting exercises: how to reach and address needs of disadvantaged groups 2014 Hyderabad
Research priority setting that inform or use systematic reviews 2023 London
Research synthesis priorities and guideline development: Linking evidence synthesis production to evidence needs 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Research synthesis to help going from evidence to decision: a practical application of the GRADE/DECIDE Evidence to Decision Framework 2015 Vienna
Research transparency in 59 fields of medical and health sciences: A meta-research study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Research trends and Hotspots analysis of multiple sclerosis diagnosis from 2010 to 2019: a bibliometric analysis 2020 Abstracts
Research waste caused by symptom-based eligibility: a systematic review of Cochrane reviews and their component trials 2023 London
Researcher adherence to data sharing policies of journals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reserpine for Hypertension 2000 Cape Town
Residual confounding a criterion for assessing quality of randomized trials 1997 Amsterdam
Resource se compared to evidence of effectiveness as an indirect measure of clinical quality and a basis for improvement 2011 Madrid
Resources to improve accessibility of systematic review evidence for decision-makers: a systematic scoping review 2010 Keystone
Responses to a systematic review 2005 Melbourne
Responsible research: trends over time in randomized clinical trials 2019 Santiago
Responsiveness: A unique psychometric property to consider in evidence-based practice 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Restricting abstracts of Cochrane Reviews: a pragmatic solution 2016 Seoul
Results from an exemplar realist review of advocacy interventions for abused women 2019 Santiago
Results from Cochrane’s living systematic review pilot 2018 Edinburgh
Results from RCTs and systematic reviews: to whom do they apply? 1996 Adelaide
Results in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions that are reported as statistically significant often contain risk of type I error greater than 5% 2015 Vienna
Results of a Brazilian national program focused on qualifying the national public health system. A case study. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Results of an online survey evaluating reasons for retrospective trial registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance 2018 Edinburgh
Results of the pilot mentoring programme for Managing Editors 2009 Singapore
Results reporting in clinical trial registries: identifying barriers and facilitators 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Retention policies for health workers in rural and remote areas: an overview of reviews 2015 Vienna
Rethinking and contextualizing evidence use for primary health care decision-making at subnational levels in Ghana: perspectives from civil society 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rethinking communication – Integrating storytelling for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study 2016 Seoul
Rethinking the content of questionnaires when assessing barriers to guideline implementation: a scoping review 2016 Seoul
Rethinking Trials of Antibiotics for Acute Respiratory Infections: Taking Account of Recruitment Exclusion of The Most Ill. 2002 Stavanger
Retrieval bias in the German dental literature 2009 Singapore
Retrieving studies for prognosis systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
Retrospective case study to test performance of machine learning: results from Cochrane Heart 2016 Seoul
Returning peer reviewer comments for Cochrane protocols and reviews via webinars: A pilot project 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Review authors' views of the PRISMA statement 2018 Edinburgh
Review of Cochrane systematic reviews by medical students: Disseminating information of excellence on evidence-based health 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Review of quality-assessment tools in systematic reviews of cost-effectiveness analyses. Are checklists fit for purpose? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Review or original article? The manuscript category of systematic review and meta-analysis in high-impact biomedical journals 2011 Madrid
Reviewing for cost effectiveness model parameters 2010 Keystone
Reviewing outside the office: involving women with young children in systematic reviews 2018 Edinburgh
Reviewing psychometric properties of HRQL measures in mental health: Practical experience 2011 Madrid
Reviewing systematic reviews: Can technology boost children’s learning? A meta-analysis of What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) early childhood education programmes 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Reviewing the quantity and quality of evidence available to inform NICE diagnostic guidance. Initial results focusing on end-to-end studies and the implications for Cochrane Reviews 2016 Seoul
Reviewing the reviews: the evidence base of contemporary medicine is weak 1998 Baltimore
Reviewing the role of educational outreach visits for type 2 diabetes management in Singapore – a pragmatic approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reviewing the ways in which traditions and gender norms influence migrant men's views and treatment of sexual and reproductive health 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Reviews for Africa Programme (RAP): training in the science of research synthesis 2006 Dublin
Reviews for Africa Programme: what 3 years of RAPping can do for you! 2008 Freiburg
Reviews in the area of occupational health and safety literature: results of a four-year pilot 2010 Keystone
Reviews in the humanitarian field: adaptation and transparency 2015 Vienna
Reviews of effectiveness within a wider world of syntheses of knowledge 2012 Auckland
Reviews of parent-child health interventions in public health nursing: a systematic overview 1995 Oslo
Reviews with survival from cancer as the primary outcome: writing the protocol 2008 Freiburg
RevMan 5 for Cochrane Diagnostic test accuracy reviews 2008 Freiburg
RevMan 5 for Cochrane Intervention review authors - learn to use all the features hands-on. 2008 Freiburg
RevMan 5 for new and prospective Cochrane authors: learn how to use the software 2015 Vienna
RevMan 5 for new and prospective Cochrane authors: learn how to use the software 2016 Seoul
RevMan 5 for new and prospective Cochrane Intervention review authors: learn how to use the software 2014 Hyderabad
RevMan 5 presentation for Cochrane Intervention review authors 2008 Freiburg
RevMan 5.1 for Cochrane intervention review authors: How using all the new features can make life easier 2012 Auckland
RevMan 5.2 for Cochrane intervention review authors—how using all the new features can make life easier ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops 2013 Québec City
RevMan 5.3 for experienced Cochrane intervention review authors: learn to use the new features hands-on 2014 Hyderabad
Revolutionizing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis with Innovative Software Solutions 2023 London
RICE or ice: what does the evidence say? The evidence base for first aid treatment of sprains and strains 2015 Vienna
Rigorous and relevant systematic reviews: Lessons learned from mixed-methods approaches in international development 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rigorous editorial processes assure high quality products at the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) 2006 Dublin
Risk and benefits of pediatric phase I trial in oncology, 2004 through 2014: a systematic review 2015 Vienna
Risk assessment of isoflavones in food supplements: a graphical approach to qualitative synthesis 2016 Seoul
Risk difference estimation and reporting in systematic reviews 2011 Madrid
Risk difference estimation and reporting in systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
Risk factors for abstracts falsely excluded during single-reviewer screening – a methods study 2023 London
Risk factors for hemodynamic instability after carotid artery stenting : a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Intervention Reviews: update on the pilot and implementation in Cochrane 2020 Abstracts
Risk of Bias 2 tool: the user's point of view 2023 London
Risk of bias and applicability assessments for overall prognosis studies (RoB-OPS): Current development status 2023 London
Risk of bias and conflict of interest in clinical trials of infant formula 2019 Santiago
Risk of bias and data extraction form for prognosis studies 2012 Auckland
Risk of bias and PRISMA compliance in systematic reviews of rare disease 2020 Abstracts
Risk of bias and reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in paediatric pain: a cross-sectional study 2023 London
Risk of bias and reporting quality of randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery: a cross-sectional study 2023 London
Risk of bias assessment and comparison of Chilean randomised clinical trials: An analysis by funding source 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Risk of bias assessment in cross-sectional genetic research: the impact of genetic polymorphisms on methadone response 2013 Québec City
Risk of bias assessment in systematic review with network meta-analysis: a meta-research study with AMSTAR-2, ROBIS and the ROB-NMA tool 2023 London
Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 190 systematic reviews of trials 2018 Edinburgh
Risk of bias assessment of studies included in multiple Cochrane Reviews: agreement between different reviews 2013 Québec City
Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS): Development and validation of a new instrument 2011 Madrid
Risk of bias assessment tools used in non-Cochrane reviews of interventions: a meta-epidemiologic study 2023 London
Risk of bias in pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials: a systematic review 2013 Québec City
Risk of bias in trials of chronic medical conditions. A meta-epidemiologic study 2020 Abstracts
Risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews were often inadequate 2020 Abstracts
Risk of bias of a set of primary studies across systematic reviews showed highly heterogeneous assessments: A methodological analysis within an overview 2023 London
Risk of bias of studies published as systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in cancer prevention – a systematic survey 2019 Santiago
Risk of bias tool evaluation: process and results 2010 Keystone
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analysis on acupuncture in international journals 2012 Auckland
Risk of bias tools: a systematic review of usability 2023 London
Risk of bias versus quality assessment in systematic reviews: a comparison between ROBIS and AMSTAR 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Risk of bias versus quality: application and recommendations for the Cochrane ‘Risk of bias’ tool 2008 Freiburg
Risk of bias: are judgements consistent between reviews? 2014 Hyderabad
Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal complications with NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors 2004 Ottawa
Risk of Sleep Disorders Following COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Risk Prediction Models for in-hospital Mortality in Acute Aortic Dissection: A Systematic review 2020 Abstracts
Risk Ratio vs Odds Ratio: Optimal presentation in GRADE evidence profiles 2023 London
Risk-of-bias assessment in systematic review with network meta-analysis: a meta-research study with AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, and the ROB-NMA tool 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Risperidone for schizophrenia - a systematic review 1997 Amsterdam
RITES: a new systematic review tool to assess the characteristics of included trials along the efficacy/effectiveness continuum 2015 Vienna
ROB-2: A pilot test on the applicability to public health and health systems reviews and impact on GRADE ratings 2019 Santiago
ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of non-reporting biases in systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis 2023 London
ROBIS: a new tool to assess the risk of bias in a systematic review 2014 Hyderabad
RobotAnalyst: An online system to support citation screening in evidence reviewing 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Robotic research meets professional craft: Meta-ethnography exploring influences on school-based evidence-informed decision making for health, wellbeing or educational improvement 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
RobotReviewer: a tool for automating evidence synthesis — development and evaluation to date, and future plans 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
ROC analysis of prediction for gastric cancer development using serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori antibody tests 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Role of Cochrane reviews in informing US private payers’ medical policies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Role of Cochrane systematic reviews in health technology assessment in Argentina 2005 Melbourne
Role of sodium intake in blood pressure, mortality, and cardiovascular disease outcomes: an umbrella review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Role of staff involvement in health and safety measures in disaster risk-reduction strategy in selected Kenyan horticulture research institutions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Roles of contributors, panel composition, and policies for authorship in practice guideline development: a survey of guidance documents 2019 Santiago
Room for a (Southern) view: bringing Southern theories into evidence synthesis to address inequities in perspectives 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Room for improvement: how to validate your MEDLINE search before using it in the update 2009 Singapore
Rotavirus vaccine for Indian children: can latest evidence modify policy guidelines in India? 2014 Hyderabad
Rotavirus vaccines: a comparison of Brazilian healthcare policy and evidence from a Cochrane review 2007 Sao Paulo
Routine Health Information System (RHIS) interventions to improve health systems management: An EPOC- Cochrane effectiveness systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Routine piloting in systematic reviews to improve usability: a case study 2016 Seoul
Routine preoperative investigation: results of a survey in Italy 1997 Amsterdam
Routine preoperative investigation: results of a survey in Italy 1997 Amsterdam
RTMAS: a computerized system for the "real-time" construction of meta-analyses using pre-extracted data from randomized control trial databases 1994 Hamilton
Running Cochrane priority setting processes: practical guidance 2019 Santiago
Russian translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries: experience with and feedback from an online survey on quality and importance 2015 Vienna
Russian translations of Cochrane Plain language summaries: quality assurance with continued feedback from an online survey 2016 Seoul
Safe care for children: A scoping review of what we know, and what we need to find out 2011 Madrid
Safe management of bodies of deceased persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection: a rapid systematic review 2020 Abstracts
Safety And Effectiveness Of Adding Long-Acting p2-Agonists To Inhaled Corticosteroidds In The Management Of Chronic Asthma. 1999 Rome
Safety and effectiveness of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Safety and efficacy of antigen-specific therapeutic approaches for multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Safety of Chinese herbal medicine for stroke: a proposal for developing the framework of an evidence-based education program for clinicians 2016 Seoul
Same quality, less time? Search methods for rapid reviews 2019 Santiago
Sample size calculations for meta-epidemiological studies 2004 Ottawa
SAMURAI—a new statistical program for sensitivity analyses using unpublished but registered studies 2013 Québec City
Sarcopenia and chronic renal disease: a scoping review 2019 Santiago
Scaffolding approaches to evidence-based practice (EBP) curriculum development, teaching and learning, and evaluation through global partnerships 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Scales to assess the quality of acupuncture clinical trials: a systematic review 2010 Keystone
Scaling the Tower of Babel; the impact of including foreign language articles in a large-scale systematic review 2010 Keystone
Scaling up/boosting the production of scientific evidence in low and middle income countries 2013 Québec City
Schizophrenia trials in Mexico: are we producing our own evidence? 2018 Edinburgh
Scientific choices, based on patient voices: integrating qualitative methods in an evidence based-guideline on remote physiotherapy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Scientific development and knowledge diffusion through academic leagues: the experience from vascular and endovascular surgery's academic league of UNIFESP, Brazil 2019 Santiago
Scientific evidence and practice: Bridging the gap.A European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) project to promote Best Practice in drug addiction 2011 Madrid
Scientific Evidence Code System (SEVCO): a common language for communicating evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Scientific journals and evidence: What does the future hold? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Scientific presentation: Assessing the quality of non-English language randomized controlled trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analysis 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: Benefits of meta-analysis using individual patient data 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: Blinding and exclusions after randomisation in controlled trials 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: Systematic reviews as basis for a treatment standard for tennis elbow in general practice 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: The development of a specialised trial database 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: The importance of prospectively registering trials: evidence of publication bias from a cohort study of research protocols 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: The role of the adequacy of effect model on the heterogeneity statistic in meta-analysis 1995 Oslo
Scientific presentation: Who uses the Cochrane Pregnancy and Child-birth Database? 1995 Oslo
Scientific rigor and qualitative research 1996 Adelaide
Scientificity, transparency and applicability of Chinese guidelines and expert consensuses on nursing published in 2022 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Scientometric analysis of High-cited Papers in General Practice research: 2010-2020 2020 Abstracts
SCOOPS versus PICO: testing a new framework for describing reviews of implementation research in healthcare 2018 Edinburgh
Scope and consistency of outcomes reported in randomised trials included in Cochrane systematic reviews of haemodialysis 2015 Vienna
Scope and quality of Cochrane Reviews of nutrition-related interventions 2015 Vienna
Scope, quality and reporting of clinical practice guidelines for newborn and child health in South Africa, Nigeria, and Malawi. 2023 London
Scoping and question refinement for systematic reviews commissioned by policy customers 2023 London
Scoping exercise to map training materials currently available to support review authors 2008 Freiburg
Scoping review for informing and refining the question of a complex Cochrane review 2014 Hyderabad
Scoping review of active surveillance practices for vaccine safety: the importance of identification of diverse evidence in an iterative process 2019 Santiago
Scoping review on methodological approaches for clinical trials in “personalised medicine” 2020 Abstracts
Scoping reviews for WHO guidelines: using a two-tiered search strategy to balance efficiency and comprehensiveness 2023 London
Scoping reviews on climate-health topics: Recommendations for methods development 2020 Abstracts
Scoping reviews to inform stakeholders and policy makers: an initiative on how to prevent visits to the Emergency Department (ED) among patients with cancer 2019 Santiago
Scoping reviews versus systematic reviews: results from a scoping review of scoping reviews 2015 Vienna
Scoping reviews: a valuable first step in knowledge synthesis 2013 Québec City
Scoping reviews: breaking down the what, why, and how 2023 London
Scoring the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: an example using QUADAS 2004 Ottawa
Scoring trials on the efficacy-effectiveness continuum: A systematic analysis 2011 Madrid
Screen2Go: a pilot smartphone app for citation screening 2011 Madrid
Screen4Me: using machine learning and citizen science for study identification in Cochrane Reviews 2019 Santiago
Screening and early detection of post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia: a best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Screening and the utility of textual analysis software: a retrospective study of RefVizTM 2004 Ottawa
Screening evidence for systematic reviews using a text-mining system: The RobotAnalyst 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: A policy brief 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Screening for decisional conflict in clinical practice: validation of SURE 2013 Québec City
Screening for depression in pregnant and postpartum women: an individual participant data meta-analysis of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale 2020 Abstracts
Screening for depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) alone and in combination with the PHQ-9: individual participant data meta-analysis 2020 Abstracts
Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer 2004 Ottawa
ScreenToGo: a mobile app to support the screening of citations 2012 Auckland
Se habla español: 25 years of Cochrane evidence in Spanish 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
SEA-ORCHID project in Thailand: practice and health outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among three different care level hospitals 2006 Dublin
Search and retrieval strategies in the systematic literature search: terminologies and taxonomies in information and library sciences 2015 Vienna
Search filter accuracy to LILACS (via iAHx 2.6-5 interface) for retrieving Randomized Controlled Trials by Brazilian Cochrane Centre 2013 Québec City
Search filter for retrieving overviews of systematic reviews in The Cochrane Library 2013 Québec City
Search filter to identify reports of randomised controlled trials in CINAHL 2018 Edinburgh
Search filters: choosing, using and abusing 2006 Dublin
Search filters: mapping the literature using a novel form of content analysis 2015 Vienna
Search methods for diagnostic test accuracy reviews in dementia: an overview of a programme grant 2013 Québec City
Search reporting: current practice and recommendations from 11 scales 2006 Dublin
Search sources for climate-health evidence syntheses: overview and interactive evaluation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Search strategies and data sources for adverse effects reviews 2013 Québec City
Search strategies for clinical guidelines vary in guideline development handbooks 2018 Edinburgh
Search strategies for locating evaluations of health promotion initiatives 1995 Oslo
Search strategies to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE: systematic review 2018 Edinburgh
Search strategies to retrieve studies related to lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) 2010 Keystone
Search summary table for systematic reviews (SRs) 2015 Vienna
Search summary tables: a case study using three Cochrane Reviews of treatment options for recurrent abdominal pain in children 2018 Edinburgh
Search wide and dig deep: identifying ‘views’ research for systematic reviews 2010 Keystone
Searching a database of knowledge translation resources for public health: The Registry of Methods and Tools 2013 Québec City
Searching a database of knowledge translation resources for public health: The Registry of Methods and Tools 2013 Québec City
Searching and tracking in the Cochrane Register of Studies (restricted) ***In computer lab; no need for personal laptops 2013 Québec City
Searching bias in Cochrane reviews on peripartum antiretroviral therapies for preventing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV 2007 Sao Paulo
Searching bibliographic databases: costs and benefits 1997 Amsterdam
Searching Chinese biomedical databases: current practice among Cochrane reviewers 2015 Vienna
Searching clinical trials registers: guidance and recommendations for systematic reviewers 2023 London
Searching far and wide for occupational prevention literature: Where do we go to findrelevant studies? 2011 Madrid
Searching for and classifying non-randomized studies 2018 Edinburgh
Searching for and including non-randomised trials in Cochrane reviews: is it worth the effort? 2010 Keystone
Searching for black swans: critically assessing surrogate markers in Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
Searching for blogs and social media posts for evidence maps: a case study using Topical Steroid Withdrawal Syndrome 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Searching for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies 2015 Vienna
Searching for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies 2018 Edinburgh
Searching for diagnostic test accuracy studies: an application to screening for open angle glaucoma (OAG) 2006 Dublin
Searching For Evidence In Public Health Research: Which Source Is Most Effective? 1999 Rome
Searching for indirect evidence: advantages and challenges of extending the network of studies 2013 Québec City
Searching for intervention studies in gastroenterology: surprisingly low incremental benefit of Embase 2004 Ottawa
Searching for qualitative primary studies: Where do we find primary studies included in Cochrane qualitative evidence syntheses 2020 Abstracts
Searching for studies 2008 Freiburg
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: a core Cochrane methods introductory workshop for Cochrane Review authors and others 2019 Santiago
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: a core Cochrane methods introductory workshop for Cochrane Review authors and others 2023 London
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews: an introduction 2015 Vienna
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews: an introduction 2016 Seoul
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: an introduction for Cochrane Review authors and others 2018 Edinburgh
Searching for success in a public health intervention review 2010 Keystone
Searching for systematic reviews of adverse effects 2005 Melbourne
Searching for systematic reviews: How easy are they to identify in biomedical databases? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Searching for the evidence: source, time and yield 1997 Amsterdam
Searching for trials - bridging the gaps 2004 Ottawa
Searching for trials in systematic reviews versus a specialist trials register: a case study comparison of source, time and costs 2015 Vienna
Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane Reviews: cross-sectional study 2013 Québec City
Searching for, retrieving and incorporating adverse effects data 2008 Freiburg
Searching KoreaMed: increasing the discoverability of trials conducted and published in Korea 2016 Seoul
Searching LILACS database improves systematic reviews 1998 Baltimore
Searching LILACS database is irrelevant in systematic reviews in oncology 2008 Freiburg
Searching LILACS in Cochrane reviews: methods used and user’s feedback 2020 Abstracts
Searching MEDLINE: publication type as prima facie evidence of study design 1997 Amsterdam
Searching meeting abstracts: a comparison between an experienced handsearcher and an indexed, electronic database 1996 Adelaide
Searching non-Anglophone databases I: developing a search strategy for PSYNDEX 1996 Adelaide
Searching non-Anglophone databases II: developing a search strategy for LILACS 1996 Adelaide
Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy 2020 Abstracts
Searching the Chinese literature for public health interventions: Can it add value to a systematic review? 2011 Madrid
Searching to identify meta-analyses: it aint easy 1996 Adelaide
Searching trials registers and trials results registers 2015 Vienna
Searching trials registers to identify relevant studies for Cochrane Reviews: verifying the optimal search approaches 2015 Vienna
Searching trials registers to identify studies for Cochrane Reviews (restricted) ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops 2013 Québec City
Searching trials registries first: a fast method for finding published studies 2016 Seoul
Secondary research first, primary research second: avoiding research waste in a humanitarian aid organization. 2020 Abstracts
Seek and ye shall ﬁnd: methods for obtaining unpublished data 2009 Singapore
Seizing opportunities: engaging policy makers in evidence informed discussions, planning and policy making 2014 Hyderabad
Selecting Cochrane Reviews to be developed as Cochrane Clinical Answers: what selection criteria should we use? 2014 Hyderabad
Selecting databases for literature searching in social care: an analysis of included studies in systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Selecting methods to display graphically the results of systematic reviews: where is the evidence? 1996 Adelaide
Selecting statistical methods for meta-analyzing diagnostic accuracy data: an online survey 2012 Auckland
Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatment meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatments meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? 1994 Hamilton
Selecting tools to assist general practitioners in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of work-related mental health conditions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Selection Bias in Preterm Cohort Studies Overestimates Survival: A Systematic Review 1999 Rome
Selection in reported epidemiological risks 2006 Dublin
Selective cutoff reporting in depression screening accuracy studies: a comparison of meta-analysis of published cutoffs only versus all cutoffs 2020 Abstracts
Selective cutoff reporting in diagnostic test accuracy studies of depression screening tools: comparing traditional meta-analysis to individual patient data meta-analysis 2015 Vienna
Selective publication of clinical trials and legal response: The right to health and information 2011 Madrid
Selective reporting of outcome data: are we following the Cochrane Handbook guidance? 2015 Vienna
Selective reporting of outcomes of drug trials? Comparison of study protocols and published articles 2006 Dublin
Selective reporting of renal effects in clinical trials about cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors anti-inflammatories 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Selective reporting of results in government-funded randomised trials 2004 Ottawa
Selective reporting of the primary outcomes of clinical trials: a follow-up study 2006 Dublin
Selective reporting: a proxy or a more direct indicator of our confidence in the summary estimates? 2013 Québec City
Selective searching for high-quality health-related evidence syntheses – more bias or time gained? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Self care interventions: which outcomes are important to consumers? 2005 Melbourne
Self-controlled case-series design in vaccine safety: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Semi-automated data extraction for systematic reviews with a large language model: a study within reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Semi-automated data extraction workbench for environmental health 2020 Abstracts
Semi-automating citation screening: a retrospective assessment of a hybrid machine learning/crowdsourced approach using one year’s worth of human-generated data from the Embase crowdsourcing project 2016 Seoul
Sense and sensibility: automated clustering to code studies across health and social care systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
Sensitivity analysis in systematic reviews of qualitative evidence: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review 2015 Vienna
Sensitivity and precision of ‘practice guideline[pt]’ in PubMed 2016 Seoul
Sensitivity and precision of terms in Phases I, II and III of the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) for identifying reports of randomized trials in Africa in HIV/AIDS in MEDLINE 2006 Dublin
Sensitivity and specificity do vary with disease prevalence: implications for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy 2007 Sao Paulo
Sensitivity and specificity rarely vary with prevalence 2010 Keystone
Sensitivity of a search filter designed to identify studies reporting health state utility values 2015 Vienna
Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation 2008 Freiburg
Sensitivity of treatment decisions to bias adjustment in network meta-analysis 2018 Edinburgh
Sensitivity, precision and efficiency of search strategies built using PubReMiner compared with current best practice search strategy building. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of using abstracts to identify RCTs of asthma educational interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE 1996 Adelaide
Separating fact from fiction: Enhancing critical thinking to equip the next generation for the post-truth society 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Sequential meta-analysis research tracks (SMART): a step-by-step algorithm to conduct smart meta-analyses 2012 Auckland
Setting of an observatory of clinical trial transition regarding data sharing – IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trials data) Observatory 2015 Vienna
Setting priorities for Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation 2015 Vienna
Setting priorities for Cochrane Reviews on Multiple Sclerosis 2020 Abstracts
Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on the management of primary angle closure (PAC): A survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians 2011 Madrid
Setting priorities for primary research: disaggregating systematic review data to inform the Healthy Lives Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Setting research priorities with multiple professions and service users 2014 Hyderabad
Setting up a Field. Can strategic management help? 1996 Adelaide
Setting up a national translation initiative for Malay: ideas, challenges and future directions 2018 Edinburgh
Setting up a rapid evidence synthesis service in the Western Cape, South Africa 2018 Edinburgh
Setting up National Health Research Priorities in Malaysia through evidence gap maps 2023 London
Several methods for assessment of research waste in systematic reviews: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Severe selective reporting bias and its unexpected correction outcomes in acute ischemic stroke trials: a meta-epidemiological study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Severe sepsis: how many guidelines have been including Cochrane systematic reviews? 2008 Freiburg
Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (SGAT-SR): impact on the consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane Reviews of interventions to prevent healthcare associated infections 2018 Edinburgh
Sex and gender consideration in Cochrane Reviews of interventions for HIV/AIDS and hypertension: pre-post study after implementing guidance 2019 Santiago
Sex and gender issues in research and publishing: implications for Cochrane Reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Sex- and gender-based analyses in Cochrane Reviews: Methods and lessons learned 2011 Madrid
Sex/gender analysis in Cochrane reviews of healthcare-associated infections is uncommon 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Sexual networking and AIDS education at the workplace and the community: The case of Oil locations in Nigeria. 2000 Cape Town
SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2020 Abstracts
Shall we search all trial registers? A comparative study of the sensitivity of five trial registers used by the Cochrane Skin Group 2012 Auckland
Shaping HTA to meet new regulatory and pricing evidence requirements in the UK 2013 Québec City
Shaping systematic reviews to meet users' interests: getting started 2016 Seoul
Shaping the conceptual framework of the WHO Abortion care guideline 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
SHARE-IT: rapid production of online decision aids linked to guidelines for point-of-care shared-decision making 2016 Seoul
Shared decision making and decision aids in MEDLINE 2016 Seoul