• Shared decision making does not influence physicians against clinical practice guidelines 2013 Québec City
• Shared decision making in health care: a literature review 2010 Keystone
• Shared decision-making for the management of neonatal jaundice in Taiwan: a multi-center questionnaire survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Shared decision-making interventions for children with chronic conditions: Determining the clarity of the evidence 2011 Madrid
• Shared support for consumers in Cochrane 2014 Hyderabad
• Sharing Cochrane Consumer Synopses with University Staff and Students: Experiences from Nigeria 2002 Stavanger
• Sharing evidence through Twitter 2013 Québec City
• Sharing evidence with clinicians in ethically sound environment 2013 Québec City
• Sharing individual-participant data from clinical research: point of view of Italian patient and citizen associations 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Sharing participant-level clinical trial data in public repositories: what are implications for Cochrane reviews? 2013 Québec City
• Sharing resources to develop a guideline with little direct cost: the Bahrain Evidence-based Guideline INitiative (B.E.G-I-N) experience 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Sharing tacit knowledge to build capacity for knowledge translation: lessons learned from pan-Canadian public health webinars 2013 Québec City
• Sharing through play: creating a board game for disseminating research to care home staff 2019 Santiago
• Sharing trial-level data from multiple meta-epidemiological studies - Experiences from establishing the COMFIT Study Group and Database 2020 Abstracts
• Sharp increase in access to the Japanese translations of Cochrane systematic review abstracts after the intro­duction of a non-login system 2009 Singapore
• Shedding light on the maze of study labels and features: analysis of CBA and ITS studies in Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2015 Vienna
• Shifting effects in three randomised controlled trials on music therapy in mental health 2011 Madrid
• Short-term use of statins for prevention of delayed ischemic neurological deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (coil versus clip): meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
• Short-term use of therapeutic opioids for children and future misuse: a systematic review and qualitative study of decision-maker information needs 2020 Abstracts
• Shortening the pipeline: the use of data mining to link new trials to Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
• Shortening the pipeline: the use of data mining to link new trials to Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
• Should a power analysis be included in a systematic review? 1997 Amsterdam
• Should aggregate data be included where individual participant data are unavailable? Lessons from a large individual participant data meta-analysis 2023 London
• Should all inclusion criteria be used for inclusion? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should case series be included in systematic reviews when controlled trials are scarce? 2015 Vienna
• Should Cochrane limit the number of outcomes in a systematic review? 2014 Hyderabad
• Should Cochrane reviews that include full text reports of nonrandomised evidence also include abstracts of such evidence? 2008 Freiburg
• Should Cochranites adopt a specific hierarchy of outcomes? 2014 Hyderabad
• Should conference abstracts be included in systematic reviews? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should data from case-control studies be included in systematic reviews alongside diagnostic cohort studies? 2006 Dublin
• Should diagnostic search filters be used in systematic reviews? 2004 Ottawa
• Should Economic Appraisal Be Combined Within Systematic Reviews In The Cochrane Library? 1999 Rome
• Should first dressing change be 24 hours after CVC insertion in pediatric critically ill patients? A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should guideline developers include clinicaltrials.gov in exhaustive literature reviews? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should I include non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) in my systematic review, and, if so, which types? An author-focused workshop 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should industry funding of trials included in all Cochrane drug reviews be declared in the plain language summary? 2007 Sao Paulo
• Should non-randomised studies be included in reviews of interventions for vulnerable groups: a case study from domestic violence research? 2005 Melbourne
• Should our reviews be more concerned with gender of participants in trials? 2000 Cape Town
• Should Referees of Systematic Reviews Have Access to Original Papers? 1999 Rome
• Should sensitivities derived from 2x1 tables be included in diagnostic systematic reviews: a review of systematic reviews 2005 Melbourne
• Should systematic reviews include non-randomized trials? Quality and results of various study types investigating the effect of acupuncture on idiopathic headaches 1999 Rome
• Should systematic reviews of diagnostic tests go beyond test accuracy? 2008 Freiburg
• Should the PRISMA statement be fully qualified to report an updated meta-analysis? A case report 2013 Québec City
• Should there be Cochrane reviews of disease aetiology? A discussion poster 2005 Melbourne
• Should we continue to handsearch MEDLINE-indexed journals prospectively? Some up-to-date empirical evidence 1997 Amsterdam
• Should we exclude poorly reported qualitative studies from systematic reviews? An evaluation of three reviews of qualitative data 2010 Keystone
• Should we Review Single Interventions or All Comparators in a Decision-Making Context? 1999 Rome
• Should we treat? Should we not treat? A meta-analysis as a powerful tool in conducting systematic reviews, and our evidence-based observations for the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) in adult patients with Idiopatic Glomerulonephritides (GN). 1999 Rome
• Should we trust author correspondence? A case study looking at risk of bias 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Should we update Cochrane reviews every two years? A methodological study 2004 Ottawa
• Shuxuetong injection for ischaemic stroke: An overview of systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Side effects of treatment of COVID-19 with drugs or medical devices: systematic review and case report 2020 Abstracts
• Sifting the evidence: the Achilles heel of the evidence-based medicine (EBM) paradigm 2006 Dublin
• Sigma N=1 does not equal RCT 1997 Amsterdam
• Significance-chasing bias: conceptual framework and an exploratory test 2006 Dublin
• Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2000 Cape Town
• Silenced Narratives: Unravelling Sexual function Challenges in Migrant and Refugee 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Similarities in the use and presentation of outcome measures: a prerequisite for combining study results. 2000 Cape Town
• Similarity of the benefit risk ratio between children and adults: results of a meta-epidemiological study 2015 Vienna
• Similarity of the treatment benefit between children and adults: results of a meta-epidemiological study 2015 Vienna
• Simple 'quick’ searches to answer questions arising in clinical practice 2011 Madrid
• Simplicity, usability and accessibility: demonstrating successful tools produced by the Evidence Synthesis Hackathon 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Simplifying Cochrane Systematic Reviews with AI for Improved Shared Decision Making 2023 London
• Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiological study 2011 Madrid
• Six Sigma applications for patient safety in a university hospital 2011 Madrid
• Small sample size, composite endpoints, trials stopped early for benefit: threats to valid meta-analysis 2008 Freiburg
• Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis 2015 Vienna
• Small study effect and publication bias in systematic reviews with meta-analyses 2012 Auckland
• Smoking and Health Outcomes: An Evidence Mapping from Existing Systematic Reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Smoking cessation in pregnancy: re-analysing equity in a Cochrane Review 2010 Keystone
• So what the hell is an odds ratio? Can we make the results of reviews more easily understood? 1996 Adelaide
• So, where is the evidence for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia? 1997 Amsterdam
• Social inequalities and access to health services in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Havana, Cuba, 2012 to 2015 2019 Santiago
• Social involvement when incorporating technologies in Brazilian supplementary healthcare 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Social media as a knowledge-translation tool to disseminate public-health evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Social media for dissemination of Cochrane evidence in Polish and creating engagement opportunities 2018 Edinburgh
• Social media strategy for disseminating systematic review evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Social network analysis for identifying central outcomes for clinical research: a case study using Cochrane reviews of HIV/AIDS 2015 Vienna
• Social network analysis of the Cochrane Facebook Group 2015 Vienna
• Social relevance of evidence-based medicine in the Brazilian drug market 2011 Madrid
• Social sustainability of healthcare systems: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Social values underlying priority setting 2014 Hyderabad
• Social work and the Cochrane Collaboration: qualitative interviews with Cochrane contributors of social work background 2013 Québec City
• Social, behavioural and community-engagement interventions (SBCE) for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: An evidence-gap map (EGM) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Sociological perspective 2008 Freiburg
• Sociopolitical factors for the institutionalization of evidence-informed policymaking in South America 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors for patients with chronic kidney disease: a risk-stratified clinical practice guideline. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Software for calculating the number needed to treat for Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
• Software for computing treatment effects, performing meta-analyses, and creating forest plots 2005 Melbourne
• Software for data transformation for time-to-event outcomes 2007 Sao Paulo
• Software for handsearching control and management of randomized and clinical controlled trials 2005 Melbourne
• Software for making the best use of published summary statistics in systematic reviews of survival data 1997 Amsterdam
• Software solutions to create and manage systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
• Software to help manage the characteristics of included studies in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
• Software tools to support network development in network meta-analysis: a feature analysis 2018 Edinburgh
• Solutions to challenges of quality evidence production from traditional medicine research: second thoughts from developers of an evidence-based decision aid 2016 Seoul
• Sorting the men from the boys? A systematic review of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for malignancy 1997 Amsterdam
• Sorting the wheat from the chaff: How does the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Trials Register compare to searching standard electronic databases? 2011 Madrid
• Sources of heterogeneity in Cochrane Reviews on HIV 2018 Edinburgh
• Sources of information and attitudes towards evidence-based healthcare: a survey of Swiss physicians 2015 Vienna
• Sources of knowledge commonly used by Cochrane authors in developing countries 2014 Hyderabad
• Sources of knowledge in clinical practice and knowledge of evidence based medicine in postgraduate medical students and faculty members 2005 Melbourne
• South American participation in the development of core outcome sets 2019 Santiago
• Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines are methodologically good but with opportunities for improvement: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX 2023 London
• Spanish translations of Cochrane Plain language summaries: assessing the impact of a controlled language checker on machine translation quality 2018 Edinburgh
• Speaking the same language: toward a shared understanding of living evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Specialist care for epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures in adults: methodological issues in the review of multiple socially-complex interventions 2007 Sao Paulo
• Specialist digital libraries - helping to facilitate the use of Cochrane Reviews 2004 Ottawa
• Specialized Quality Assessment for Special Trials: A Quality Reassessment of Cross-over Trials Involved in Cochrane Systemtic Reviews 2010 Keystone
• Specific strategies to increase access to Cochrane training opportunities in South Africa and the African region 2020 Abstracts
• Specifics problems encountered in a meta-analysis of homeopathic medicine 1996 Adelaide
• Specify your research needs; the FIT tool for determining the nature of knowledge gaps in guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Specifying the ‘PICO’ for each synthesis: current practice and development of the InSynQ (Intervention Synthesis Questions) checklist and guide 2023 London
• Speed things up! How to accelerate the uptake of research results into clinical guidelines and practice 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Spin bias in clinical trials of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogues: a meta-epidemiologic study 2023 London
• Spin in systematic reviews and health technology assessments about robotic thoracic surgery: a systematic review 2020 Abstracts
• SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials )-Outcomes: enhanced trial outcome transparency, less bias, improved systematic reviews, better health 2019 Santiago
• SPIRIT-Outcomes and CONSORT-Outcomes: Enhanced trial outcome transparency, less bias, improved systematic reviews, better health 2020 Abstracts
• Split-Mouth and crossover trials in dentistry are neither well differentiated, nor well analyzed or reported 2011 Madrid
• Sponsorsá influence on reporting of results in industry-sponsored trials: a comparison of protocols and published papers 2011 Madrid
• Sponsorship of drug and device studies and research outcome 2011 Madrid
• Sponsorship, bias and methodology: Cochrane reviews compared with paper-based meta-analyses of the same drugs 2004 Ottawa
• Spread of evidence-based practice into directors of nursing by an outreach campaign in Taiwan 2015 Vienna
• Spreading a culture of patient involvement at an institution level: HAS feedback 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Spreading Cochrane press releases to lay people and Italian journalists 2011 Madrid
• Spreading good ideas for improving health services: a systematic review of the literature across 11 disciplinary traditions 2004 Ottawa
• Spreading the word about public health research: the Public Health Effectiveness Project 1998 Baltimore
• Staff and consumer perceptions of research in mental health settings 2005 Melbourne
• Staff self-evaluation of skills in evidence-based medicine 2016 Seoul
• Stakeholder analysis for advancing health-technology assessment in India: A pilot 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder engagement in a rapid review to determine the effectiveness of interventions to attract, recruit and retain social care workers 2023 London
• Stakeholder engagement process in priority setting for trials methodology research and Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• Stakeholder involvement for interpretation, translation, and dissemination in qualitative evidence synthesis: learnings and reflections 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder involvement for investigating communication-based interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake 2023 London
• Stakeholder involvement in Cochrane reviews of urological conditions 2014 Hyderabad
• Stakeholder involvement in selecting systematic review topics 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review 2018 Edinburgh
• Stakeholder involvement in the preparation of systematic and rapid reviews: a cross-sectional study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder involvement throughout a PhD program: principles, purpose, and process 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder involvement to enhance the relevance and accessibility of a Cochrane review of physical rehabilitation after stroke 2023 London
• Stakeholder mapping to identify stakeholders for the Cochrane Cancer Network 2020 Abstracts
• Stakeholder mapping: identifying and connecting with a diverse range of partners 2019 Santiago
• Stakeholder-related Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of Obstetric Guidelines: A Scoping Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stakeholder/consumer engagement in systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
• Stakeholders' perceptions of obstetric violence and humanized birth practices in Chile 2019 Santiago
• Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of animal assisted interventions for people with dementia: a qualitative evidence synthesis engaging patient and public 2023 London
• Standard operating procedures for the preparation Of reviews: Experiences with HTA reports in Germany 2000 Cape Town
• Standard search strategies should be conducted for clinical pathways in PubMed 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Standardising outcomes in Cochrane Pregnancy Childbirth Systematic Reviews 2016 Seoul
• STANDARDIZED COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENTS FOR PATIENTS WITH ORAL CAVITY AND OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Standardized mean differences may be used to derive odds ratios of treatment response: Meta-epidemiological study 2011 Madrid
• Standardized multilingual collaborative reporting of evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Standards for implementing Plain Language Summaries 2014 Hyderabad
• Standards for Reporting of Overviews of Reviews and Umbrella Reviews (STROVI) statement 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Standing out in an evidence-informed world: online training and credentialing for evidence-informed public health 2020 Abstracts
• STAR Recommendation: a new method to develop recommendations rapidly—protocol for development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• STARD for registration: establishing guidance on where and how to register diagnostic accuracy studies prospectively 2016 Seoul
• Start strong: choosing your review topic and writing your topic proposal 2013 Québec City
• Starting a new review group: tribulations without trials 2013 Québec City
• Starting and sustaining a Field 2014 Hyderabad
• State of current practice for addressing racial and ethnic health equity (RHE) in systematic review and guideline development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• State-of-the-art in ophthalmology randomized controlled trials 1996 Adelaide
• State-society relations in low-and middle-income countries: An evidence-gap map 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Statins for women with polycystic ovary syndrome not actively trying to conceive 2010 Keystone
• Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study 2020 Abstracts
• Statistical Approaches to Adjusting Weights for Dependent Arms in Network Meta-analysis 2018 Edinburgh
• Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study 2018 Edinburgh
• Statistical aspects of quality control of handsearching medical literature for identification of clinical trials 1997 Amsterdam
• Statistical challenges in investigating prognostic factors for memory training success in healthy older adults: a systematic review 2019 Santiago
• Statistical heterogeneity and the choice between fixed- and random-effect models: an exploratory analysis of Cochrane reviews 2010 Keystone
• Statistical literacy in health in a highly motivated patient sample 2008 Freiburg
• Statistical methods for investigating heterogeneity related to methodological quality in meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic accuracy 2005 Melbourne
• Statistical methods for meta-analysis of individual patient data 2008 Freiburg
• Statistical methods for meta-analysis: an overview 2008 Freiburg
• Statistical methods for reliably updating meta-analyses 2018 Edinburgh
• Statistical models for network meta-analysis: an empirical comparison 2015 Vienna
• Statistical simulation to assess results of meta-analyses using post-intervention, change from baseline and mixed methods 2013 Québec City
• Status of protocols in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Singapore
• Stay programme at the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre in Barcelona 2019 Santiago
• Staying ‘up-to-date’ with bladder cancer research publication rates and scatter 2016 Seoul
• Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane living systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• STEM: Systematically Testing the Evidence on Marijuana 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• StemCreDB: stem cell clinical research database platform based on systematic review 2019 Santiago
• Step-by-step guidance on conducting prospective meta-analyses 2019 Santiago
• Step-by-step guidance on conducting prospective meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
• STEPP: Supporting Translation of Evidence into Policy and Practice 2005 Melbourne
• Stepping outside our comfort zone knowledge translation in practice 2010 Keystone
• Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers 2011 Madrid
• Stimulating evidence-based healthcare in The Netherlands 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Stimulating research development: the effect of a patient-clinician partnership that identified and prioritized research needs in urinary incontinence 2010 Keystone
• Stop press! Experience of managing serious complaints about a Cochrane Review 2015 Vienna
• Stopping early should be a methodologic quality criterion for Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
• Stopping trials early for benefit is dangerous to the public health 2012 Auckland
• Stories from the ground: how integrated knowledge translation affected non-communicable disease policy and practice in five African countries 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Story of an epidemic - public health evidence South Asia - creating a social epidemic by experimenting with few 2015 Vienna
• Storyboarding as a multimodal analytical technique in a qualitative evidence synthesis 2023 London
• Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategic dissemination of Cochrane Reviews: partnering with specialty journals to enhance exposure through abbreviated articles 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies and measures to improve the quality of clinical trials in China 2011 Madrid
• Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and population: scoping review 2023 London
• Strategies for developing evidence-based guideline for colorectal cancer screening in China 2019 Santiago
• Strategies for eliciting mutual benefit from translating Cochrane Review content: the example of Cochrane Kompakt in German 2015 Vienna
• Strategies for enhancing awareness and implementation of palliative care guidelines: summary cards and online platforms for patient and healthcare providers 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies for handling dose effects in network meta-analysis: a review of practice and methodology 2016 Seoul
• Strategies for improving health systems in low-income countries: lessons learnt from four overviews of systematic reviews of health systems interventions 2015 Vienna
• Strategies for maximizing IPD retrieval in IPDMA: A mixed method study 2023 London
• Strategies for Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1999 Rome
• Strategies for successful community engagement in infectious disease clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries: Review findings visualised as storyboard 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies for the investigation of hyperandrogenism and the principles of evidence based medicine 1996 Adelaide
• Strategies for translating global evidence to local impact: bridging the gap 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies for updating clinical practice guidelines: feasibility and efficiency 2012 Auckland
• Strategies in priority setting for practice guideline development 2008 Freiburg
• Strategies that promote the use of The Cochrane Library 2006 Dublin
• Strategies to Address Anti-Black Racism in Nursing Methodological Considerations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies to build a consumer network for the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG) 2004 Ottawa
• Strategies to enhance the utilization of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses of health interventions using GRADE 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies to fill knowledge gaps in health care—experiences from the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) 2013 Québec City
• Strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised-controlled trials: A systematic review of non-randomised evaluations 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials 2010 Keystone
• Strategies to reduce attrition in randomised trials: a methodology review 2011 Madrid
• Strategy for teaching and disseminating Cochrane methodology for students and teachers of a private university in Brazil 2019 Santiago
• Strategy sharing for increasing translation capacity and disseminating translated Cochrane evidence 2016 Seoul
• Stratification by quality-induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials 2019 Santiago
• Streamlined versus extensive search methods - is there a difference? 2019 Santiago
• Streamlining communication of Cochrane content between three German language Cochrane entities under an international umbrella 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Streamlining living evidence surveillance: a case-study of Stroke Guidelines 2019 Santiago
• Streamlining meta-analysis processes through the integrated use of a computational ontology and statistical language 2008 Freiburg
• Streamlining systematic reviews to provide healthcare decision-makers with more timely evidence: the DERP experience 2015 Vienna
• Streamlining systematic reviews: Using machine learning to enhance screening efficiency 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Streamlining the review process by using structured templates for review protocols: experience with JBI SUMARI 2018 Edinburgh
• Streamlining your review using Covidence 2014 Hyderabad
• Strength of the evidence and treatment recommendations: a survey of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 Vienna
• Strengthening capacity for producing systematic reviews in low and middle income countries 2014 Hyderabad
• Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in policy making: Experience from Kenya and Malawi 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strengthening clinical governance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic (scoping) review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Strengthening collaboration between policy makers and evidence providers, and facilitating cooperation 2006 Dublin
• Strengthening health systems by integrating clinical audits and feedback into primary health care practice to assist evidence informed decision making 2018 Edinburgh
• Strengthening the global evidence base on public health and social measures through a WHO research initiative 2023 London
• Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) 2005 Melbourne
• Strengthening transparency in randomized trials related to multimorbidity: key points to guide reporting 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Striving for relevance: helping ensure that Cochrane systematic reviews meet the information needs of researchers, clinical practitioners and patients in cancer 2004 Ottawa
• Structural analysis of health technology assessements (HTA) demonstrates the need for standardized assessment of transparency, applicability and consistency (TAC criteria) 2004 Ottawa
• Structural recommendations assessment of eight clinical practice guidelines developed in Colombia 2013 Québec City
• Structured clinical trial summaries 1995 Oslo
• Structured summaries in French to facilitate access to findings of Cochrane Systematic reviews to primary care physicians: a Swiss initiative 2010 Keystone
• Structured, nurse-led ward rounds to improve interprofessional communication and optimize care of vascular surgery patients: A best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Students 4 Best Evidence: a network for students interested in evidence-based healthcare - where are we now, nearly 4 years on? 2016 Seoul
• Students 4 Best Evidence: A network for students interested in evidence-based healthcare – an interactive priority-setting workshop 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Students 4 Best Evidence: engaging students globally in evidence-based practice 2015 Vienna
• Studies predicting adverse outcomes from febrile neutropenic episodes in children and young people with malignant disease suffer similar methodological flaws as prognostic and diagnostic test accuracy studies 2010 Keystone
• Studification in the Cochrane Register of Studies 2014 Hyderabad
• Study centric data management and analysis: How does Revman Web compares with Revman 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Study design features affect estimates of sensitivity and specificity, but effects may vary 2008 Freiburg
• Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: a methodological review and classification. 2020 Abstracts
• Study of therapeutic variation in the ischemic stroke 2004 Ottawa
• Study on an 'indirect' risk prediction method of herb-induced hepatotoxicity based on artificial intelligence plus evidence-based evaluation 2019 Santiago
• Study selection by means of a web-based Trial Selection DataBase (webTSDB) 2011 Madrid
• Study settings of Cochrane HIV/AIDS systematic reviews 2005 Melbourne
• Study-based registers 2006 Dublin
• Study-based Registers 2008 Freiburg
• Subclinical hyperthyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism and risk of mortality from all causes: evidence from a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies 2007 Sao Paulo
• Subgroup analyses in individual patient data meta-analyses are driven by inconsistent use of subgroup analytic methods 2007 Sao Paulo
• Subgroup analyses in individual patient data meta­analysis: are they confounded? 2009 Singapore
• Subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
• Subgroup analysis in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: the same pitfalls as in individual trials 2007 Sao Paulo
• Substantial discrepancies exist between registered protocol and published manuscript in trials on exercise for low back pain: a meta-research study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Successful collaboration between guideline groups to reduce redundancy in guideline development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Successful implementation of opioid-use guidelines for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Successful multi-language free online animated learning resource 2016 Seoul
• Sufficiently stable systematic reviews using random order cumulative meta-analysis 2013 Québec City
• Summaries of Cochrane reviews at the physicians' desks 2000 Cape Town
• Summaries of evidence for health policymakers in low and middle income countries (LMIC) 2008 Freiburg
• Summarising and presenting evidence for prescribing and drug use consumer interventions 2007 Sao Paulo
• Summarising diagnostic accuracy using a single parameter 2015 Vienna
• Summarising evidence for harms in systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
• Summarized evidence for the busy clinician: a randomized controlled trial of an online course in evidence-based medicine using systematic reviews 2009 Singapore
• Summarizing evidence for policy: some limitations of rapid and systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
• Summary of best evidence for airway management of mechanical ventilation in critically ill obese patients 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of best evidence for self-management of patients with receiving oral warfarin therapy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of clinical evidence for cupping therapy: an overview of systematic reviews 2015 Vienna
• Summary of evidence for the treatment of pressure ulcer with electrical stimulation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
• Summary of recommendations for breastfeeding of infants born to mothers with COVID-19 2020 Abstracts
• Summary of the best evidence for electrical stimulation in patients with peripheral artery disease 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of the best evidence for peripheral arterial catheters placement and management in pediatric intensive care unit 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of the Best Evidence for Prevention of Limb Ischemia in Adult Patients with Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Pulmonary Oxygenation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Summary of the Best Evidence of Respiratory Training of the Patients with Chronic Heart Failure 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Superfilters website: a searching tool for review authors 2013 Québec City
• Superfilters website: a searching tool for review authors 2013 Québec City
• Supplementary search methods versus bibliographic database searching to identify studies: early results from our Cochrane Methods Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Supplementary searches of PubMed to improve currency of MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process searches via Ovid: evidence from practice 2015 Vienna
• Supplementary tables for systematic reviews of herbal medicine or acupuncture 2013 Québec City
• Supplementing Systematic Review Evidence with Health System Data: A Target Trial Emulation of Triptan in Migraine Patients with Increased Cardiovascular Risk 2023 London
• Supplementing Systematic Review Findings with Healthcare System Data: Final Results from the US AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program Pilot Projects 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Supporting advanced contributors to the Cochrane Collaboration in Australasia: bridging the gaps in training and support 2004 Ottawa
• Supporting carers of people with Alzheimer's disease: the qualitative challenge 1998 Baltimore
• Supporting clinical trial registration and reporting requirements at academic organizations in the USA 2018 Edinburgh
• Supporting Cochrane editorial teams 2016 Seoul
• Supporting COVID-19 Decision Making through Rapid Evidence Syntheses and Products 2023 London
• Supporting diverse review methods: a protocol and review template for Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care's (EPOC) qualitative evidence syntheses 2019 Santiago
• Supporting early career researchers overcoming challenges and ensuring accessibility in resource-constrained settings 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Supporting evidence-based decisions of the Brazilian Regulatory Agency for Supplementary Healthcare: a case study 2023 London
• Supporting evidence-based judicial decisions in Brazil: a case study 2023 London
• Supporting evidence-based practice and Cochrane reviews: the SEA-ORCHID fellowships programme 2008 Freiburg
• Supporting evidence-informed decision making through a dynamic public health evidence synthesis team 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Supporting evidence-informed decisions about healthcare systems in low and middle-income countries: the Norwegian EPOC satellite 2007 Sao Paulo
• Supporting healthcare consumer engagement and involvement: what consumer-related activities are Cochrane Geographic Groups undertaking and how can these be strengthened? 2019 Santiago
• Supporting meaningful patient and public involvement in systematic reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• Supporting physicians in decision making – a Polish experience 2015 Vienna
• Supporting policy-relevant reviews and trials in low and middle-income countries 2010 Keystone
• Supporting rapid learning and improvement in a health-system transformation: A qualitative description of implementation supports 2020 Abstracts
• Supporting systematic review authors to report and explore the applicability and transferability of their findings 2018 Edinburgh
• Supporting the use of systematic reviews in policy making through review-derived products 2009 Singapore
• Supporting trainers in evidence synthesis: Building a stronger community 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Surfing, drowning or wiped out by big data: Which way for evidence synthesis? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea 1997 Amsterdam
• Surgical trials and trial registries: a cross-sectional study of RCTs published in journals requiring trial registration in their author instructions 2013 Québec City
• Surveillance system assessing the need for updating systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
• Surveillance system assessing the need for updating systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
• Survey among Cochrane authors about early stages of systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
• Survey among IVF professionals to assist the development of a decision aid in reproductive medicine 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Survey among Spanish doctors about worldwide initiatives aiming to reduce low-value health practices and their diagnostic recommendations 2018 Edinburgh
• Survey of American Media Coverage of the Review of Mammography Trials: An Opportunity to Educate Consumers About the Risks of Detecting Ductal Carcinoma in Situ 2002 Stavanger
• Survey of clinical trials in children in WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform 2012 Auckland
• Survey of contributorship in Cochrane reviews 2000 Cape Town
• Survey of current status and its satisfaction of volunteers in Chinese Cochrane Center 2010 Keystone
• Survey of diagnostic test meta-analyses 2004 Ottawa
• Survey of investigators in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register: did they publish? If not why not? 2018 Edinburgh
• Survey of knowledge of evidence-based medicine among clinicians in China 1998 Baltimore
• Survey of outcomes in Cochrane Reviews: support for ‘core outcome set’ (COS) development 2014 Hyderabad
• Survey of plain film radiography protocols taught at chiropractic schools for acute low-back pain 2004 Ottawa
• Survey of refereeing practices of Cochrane Review Groups 1996 Adelaide
• Survey of the needs, guideline development processes, and collaborative efforts of guideline- producing organizations 2020 Abstracts
• Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation 2013 Québec City
• Survey of the use of Cochrane Style Guide guidance in published Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
• Survey of views on including grey literature in systematic reviews 2006 Dublin
• Survey on health information needs, access and practice of evidence-informed healthcare among medical practitioners in India 2014 Hyderabad
• Surveying the Belgian general population on their skills and attitudes toward evidence-based health care 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Survival analysis used to estimate time to publication of reports of randomised controlled trials 1997 Amsterdam
• Survival benefits with diverse systemic treatment regimens for advanced colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of multiple treatments 2007 Sao Paulo
• Survival curve and hazard ratio program (SCHARP) for meta-anaysis of individual patient data 1998 Baltimore
• Survival meta-analysis of individual patient data and survival meta-analysis of published (aggregate) data: is there any intermediate approach between these two opposite options? 2000 Cape Town
• Suspected publication bias regarding efficacy of psychoeducative interventions on burden experienced by caregivers of people with dementia 2013 Québec City
• Sustainable Development Goals and health research: are high-priority health problems being addressed with high-quality studies and with equity? 2019 Santiago
• SWAR 2: How much do you need? Can readers get the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews, without reading the full review? 2014 Hyderabad
• SWIFT-Active Screener: reducing literature screening effort through machine learning for systematic reviews 2016 Seoul
• Swiss family physicians' perception and attitude towards knowledge translation 2015 Vienna
• Syncope and other adverse events associated with cholinesterase inhibitors: Systematic review of the\hb literature versus analysis of the FDA Adverse Events Database 2011 Madrid
• Syndrome element diagnostic rating scale of traditional Chinese medicine 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synergy in Trustworthy Guidelines and Essential Medicine Lists 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synergy of systematic reviews of animal and clinical studies: towards evidence-based translational medicine 2013 Québec City
• Synergy strategies between scientific evidence and public policies in updating clinical practice guidelines in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synopses of national and international guidelines as the basis for disease-management programmes 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synopses: proposal for a new format 2004 Ottawa
• Synthesis methods in systematic reviews of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and qualitative evidence: an example from public health 2010 Keystone
• Synthesis of health system barriers and facilitators to scaling up vaccination communication interventions in Cameroon, Mozambique and Nigeria 2015 Vienna
• Synthesis of individual data from case reports and case series on survival 2009 Singapore
• Synthesis of qualitative research findings: What are they, where are they and what should I do with them? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synthesis of qualitative research findings: what are they, where are they and what to do with them? 2015 Vienna
• Synthesis of quality of life data in systematic reviews: problems and proposals 2007 Sao Paulo
• Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence in systematic reviews: an example from public health 2009 Singapore
• Synthesis of recommendations for clinical use of biomarkers in oncology 2011 Madrid
• Synthesis research in support of public health decision making on vector-borne diseases in Canada 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible (Part I): approaches to grouping, presentation and synthesis 2018 Edinburgh
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible (Part II): implementing good practice in reviews of complex interventions 2018 Edinburgh
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible: approaches to grouping, presentation and synthesis 2019 Santiago
• Synthesis without meta-analysis when assessing effects of return-to-work interventions – experiences from a systematic review 2023 London
• Synthesis without meta-analysis: variations in vote counting based on direction of effect lead to different conclusions about exposure/outcome relationships 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synthesising economic evaluations from different countries: challenges for Cochrane reviewers 2005 Melbourne
• Synthesising evidence in public health systematic reviews of interventions: a Bayesian approach 2018 Edinburgh
• Synthesising health impact and health inequalities: an example from a review of school-based cognitive behavioural interventions 2009 Singapore
• Synthesising risk from summary evidence across multiple risk factors 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synthesized evidence on conflict and war: a systematic map and critical appraisal of systematic reviews 2019 Santiago
• Synthesized HIV/AIDS research evidence (SHARE): An online database to capture, link, and share current HIV-related systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
• Synthesizing and presenting results when meta-analysis is not possible 2023 London
• Synthesizing evidence about emerging diagnostic technologies for practice and policy mind the gap! 2004 Ottawa
• Synthesizing health systems evidence: The contribution of a network based on North-South collaboration 2011 Madrid
• Synthesizing results from nonrandomized studies of interventions: maximizing the use of research across policy domains 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Synthesizing UN evaluations to drive progress toward the sustainable development goals: enhancing rigor to ensure credibility and use 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic and comprehensive identification of confounders for three non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) emulating 'target' randomized controlled trials (RCT) 2019 Santiago
• Systematic appraisal of Chilean clinical guidelines included in the 'Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare' Program using AGREE II 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic approach to guide the Lancet Commission on Syria: The case of healthcare workers in conflict settings 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic Bibliometric Review: A new methodology presenting patient-centred outcomes in the context of reviews, guidelines, and media reports. Part 1: Methodology description 2010 Keystone
• Systematic Bibliometric Review: A new methodology presenting patient-centred outcomes in the context of reviews, guidelines, and media reports. Part 2: A case study of Rituximab for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) 1997–2003 2010 Keystone
• Systematic evaluation of the methodology of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulation in patients with cancer 2011 Madrid
• Systematic evaluation of the quality of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulation in patients with cancer 2007 Sao Paulo
• Systematic evaluation of web-based, publicly accessible clinical trials results databases 2006 Dublin
• Systematic evidence for health improvement in health action zones 2000 Cape Town
• Systematic mapping - a new development in the evidence base for social care 2006 Dublin
• Systematic methods for identifying evidence for broad review questions: looking beyond titles and abstracts 2012 Auckland
• Systematic reevaluation of meta-analyses of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy trials in depression treatment using prediction intervals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review & meta-analysis: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) pertaining to clinical cognition assessment in stroke patients 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic review and cross cultural adaptation of clinical guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections 2010 Keystone
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of available interventions for the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia in patients with advanced prostate cancer 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies of multivariable diagnostic or prognostic models: a primer 2016 Seoul
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization singletons 2004 Ottawa
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins 2004 Ottawa
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and single group continuous data: methodological and practical challenges and benefits 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of Radiation Therapy for various head and neck cancers 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Snakebite Incidence Globally 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review and methodological exploration of synthesismethods in public health evaluations of interventions 2013 Québec City
• Systematic review and synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: A worked example to assess community preferences 2011 Madrid
• Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): beyond old school data abstraction 2013 Québec City
• Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): beyond old school data abstraction 2013 Québec City
• Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): Using a new web-based tool to extract and archive systematic review data 2012 Auckland
• Systematic review evidence in one minute or less 2018 Edinburgh
• Systematic review meets AI: a modern review technique 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic Review Methods for Observational Studies: Challenges and Solutions 2010 Keystone
• Systematic Review Methods in Environmental Health: results of a critical interpretive synthesis to inform the evolution of systematic review guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review of adverse effects of antidepressants in healthy volunteer studies 2015 Vienna
• Systematic review of antibiotic therapy for treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis and gastrointestinal bleeding. 2000 Cape Town
• Systematic review of antifibrinolytic treatment in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. A Cochrane Collaboration review 1997 Amsterdam
• Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements about living kidney donation 2011 Madrid
• Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in the diagnosis and management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodule and cancer 2013 Québec City
• Systematic review of cost of illness-studies on HIV infection 2000 Cape Town
• Systematic review of cure rates in incontinence – role of clinical experts 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review of depression in developing countries 2004 Ottawa
• Systematic Review of Endoscopic Ultrasound guided Radiofreqency Ablation for Pancreas Tumors 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic review of epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental and malformation outcomes in the child 2012 Auckland
• Systematic review of evidence grading systems for grading levels of evidence 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic review of evidence quality grading methods for public health decision-making 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review of guides that address conflicts of interest in biomedical research 2019 Santiago
• Systematic review of interventions aiming to reduce carbon-emissions within healthcare: issues with conducting reliable primary research and identifying trustworthy findings 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic Review of Interventions for Children and adolescents with Cerebral Palsy and Intervention Database Establishment 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review Of interventions for preventing HIV-infection in low-income countries 2000 Cape Town
• Systematic Review of Mobile Health: an overview 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic review of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors versus control in early parkinson s disease 2004 Ottawa
• Systematic Review of Newborn Hearing Screening Guidelines. The Starting Point for a Provincial and National Research Agenda? 1999 Rome
• Systematic review of prediction models in obstetrics: model development and clinical applicability 2014 Hyderabad
• Systematic review of prognostic models for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia - methods and challenges 2019 Santiago
• Systematic review of public opinion of the ethical considerations of using social media as a data source for research 2016 Seoul
• Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Instruments for Randomized Control Trials: Selection of SIGN50 Methodological Checklist 2007 Sao Paulo
• Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Long Acting ?22-agonists for Maintenance Treatment of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2002 Stavanger
• Systematic review of research using insurance claim data in Korea 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction 2004 Ottawa
• Systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. 2000 Cape Town
• Systematic review of the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines for nurses and professions allied to medicine 1997 Amsterdam
• Systematic review of the effectiveness of injury control interventions in children 1994 Hamilton
• Systematic review of the effectiveness of specific anti-hypertensive drug therapy 1996 Adelaide
• Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic review of the empirical evidence of the selective reporting of analyses 2013 Québec City
• Systematic review of the impact of reporting guidelines on publication quality 2011 Madrid
• SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH ON MENTAL HEALTH IN INDIA 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review on social media as a data source for information on adverse effects 2015 Vienna
• Systematic review opportunities: identifying gaps and areas of wealth in the public health review literature 2016 Seoul
• Systematic review protocol registration: the perspectives of researchers, peer-reviewers, and journal editors through an online survey 2023 London
• Systematic Review Service (SRS). China 2011 Madrid
• Systematic review tagging: knowledge translation and communicating evidence 2019 Santiago
• Systematic Review Training for Graduate Students in Dentistry: Enhancing Evidence-Based Practice 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review when there is no evidence . . . (2) Developing a methodology for a qualitative analysis of expert reviews on IMEs 2010 Keystone
• Systematic Review-Driven Conceptual Model of Uncertainties in healthcare: A guide for mapping Patient-Dentist Responses to Uncertainties in Oral Health Decisions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic review, process evaluation and knowledge translation of community interventions to tackle a 'wicked problem': food insecurity 2016 Seoul
• Systematic reviews – leading or misleading? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic reviews (SR) versus narrative reviews: is the SR drawing level? 2014 Hyderabad
• Systematic reviews addressing identified policy priorities in Eastern Mediterranean countries: a situational analysis 2014 Hyderabad
• Systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence: the past, present and future 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic reviews and Chinese guidelines: an a cross-sectional study 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews and guideline development 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses fail to address bias introduced by randomized trials stopped early 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in eyes and vision: first steps in identifying gaps in ophthalmology research 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medicine must search Chinese databases to reduce language bias 2015 Vienna
• Systematic reviews and public health decision-making: patterns in usage and priorities for change 2018 Edinburgh
• Systematic Reviews Are Not Just Passive Reflections Of Available Research Evidence 1999 Rome
• Systematic reviews assessed as high risk of bias due to avoidable failures in searching: analysis of a data set of critically appraised systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic reviews for understanding: A worked example of Boell’s hermeneutic methodology 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Systematic reviews in child and adolescent mental health and welfare: Systematic mapping 2023 London
• Systematic reviews in dentistry have problems including split-mouth and cross-over trials in meta-analysis 2011 Madrid
• Systematic Reviews in Dermatology on the Map: You Are Here 2002 Stavanger
• Systematic reviews in health policy: method, practice and challenges 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews in heart diseases: blind spots and duplication 1998 Baltimore
• Systematic reviews in nursing 1997 Amsterdam
• Systematic reviews in the prognosis field: a critical appraisal of six core clinical journals 2010 Keystone
• Systematic reviews of adverse events. Is screening by title and abstract enough? 2011 Madrid
• Systematic reviews of case reports and patient level analysis as a new tool to study rare adverse events of medications: the case of neuroleptic malignant syndrome 2020 Abstracts
• Systematic reviews of clinical decision rules: prognostic, diagnostic, both, either or neither? 2010 Keystone
• Systematic reviews of complex interventions and more complex usual care 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of complex interventions: From bare bones to greater policy relevance 2011 Madrid
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2006 Dublin
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 1: an introduction to formulating the study question and identifying eligible studies 2005 Melbourne
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 1: Formulating the study question and identification of studies 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2: assessment of methodological quality 2005 Melbourne
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 3: a practical introduction to meta-analysis 2005 Melbourne
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 3: A practical introduction to meta-analysis 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 4: advanced meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance: investigating heterogeneity and comparing tests 2005 Melbourne
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 5: applying the results in clinical practice 2005 Melbourne
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 5: presenting and interpreting results 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies: interpreting results and drawing conclusions 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. 2: assessment of methodological quality 2008 Freiburg
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. Assessment of methodological quality 2013 Québec City
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy published in the Cochrane Library: a survey of searching details 2012 Auckland
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies: Introduction to meta-analysis 2023 London
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies: introduction to meta-analysis 2019 Santiago
• Systematic Reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: a pilot review 2007 Sao Paulo
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: assessment of methodological quality 2019 Santiago
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests - a new challenge for laboratory medicine 1997 Amsterdam