• Exploring the Causal Chain through Mixed Methods: Systematic Reviews of Effects of Sports Interventions for Youth at Risk
  
• Exploring the Certainty of Evidence Over Time in a Living Systematic Review: Considerations for Updating a Systematic Review.
  
• Exploring the characteristics, reporting, and methods of systematic reviews including time-to-event meta-analyses and outcome analyses: A meta-epidemiological review
• Exploring the compliance with the AT9 strategy for managing conflicts of interest
• Exploring the concept of reproducibility and developing a needs-based tool for educating end-users about research reproducibility: A qualitative study
• Exploring the effect of patient characteristics on effectiveness using a combination of individual subject and aggregate level data
• Exploring the effect of Risk of Bias on the evaluation of knowledge translation in the context of health policy: systematic review and Meta-epidemiology analysis
• Exploring the effectiveness of core stretching exercises to improve low back pain in nursing staff: a pilot study
  
• Exploring the effects of different treatment doses by 'blurring’ the nodes of a treatment network: Application to a Cochrane overview for multiple sclerosis
• Exploring the efficacy effectiveness gap
• Exploring the empirical distribution of tau from IQWiG reports for the application in Bayesian (network) meta-analyses
• Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Horizon Scanning and Foresight Methods in Policy Decision Making: A Rapid Scoping Review
• Exploring the evidence-based decision-making process among public health decision-makers
• Exploring the experiences with a new policy for managing conflict of interest in guideline developers
• Exploring the geometry of treatment networks
• Exploring the magnitude of verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies
• Exploring the need to update systematic reviews
• Exploring the perceived socio-cultural factors in the initiation of smokeless tobacco among adolescents: A systematic review of qualitative findings
• Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Article Writing: A Comparative Evaluation of Tools
• Exploring the potential of systematically reviewing opinion literature: he Null Hypothesis Significance Testing debate
• Exploring the role for patient decision aids in Singapore
• Exploring the type of graphical representation of results from network meta-analysis that different stakeholders would prefer. An Italian survey
• Exploring the understanding of consumers and clinicians about network meta-analysis results and their usefulness to make decisions: an Italian survey
• Exploring the use of a large language model for data extraction in systematic reviews: a rapid feasibility study
• EXPLORING THE USE OF GLOBAL AND LOCAL EVIDENCE IN VACCINE INTRODUCTION AND ROLL-OUT IN KENYA
  
• Exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in studies of patients with rare diseases: a systematic survey of the literature
• Exploring the variability in cost-effectiveness results within multicountry clinical trials
• Exploring theoretical frameworks in systematic reviews
  
• Exploring treatment by covariate interactions in Cochrane Reviews: recent practice
• Exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient- level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates
• Exploring trial publication and research waste in COVID-19 randomised trials of hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, and vitamin D: a meta-epidemiological cohort study
• Exploring why WHO guideline panels are frequently making strong recommendations based on low study quality (high uncertainty)
• Expressing meta-analyses of continuous outcomes in terms of risks
• Extending and strengthening the end-user perspective in The Cochrane Collaboration
• Extending forest plots to display results from all included studies
• Extending ROBINS-I for assessment of studies reporting instrumental variable analyses
• Extending ROBINS-I for the assessment of interrupted time series and controlled before-after studies
• Extending the assessment of outcome reporting bias to harms
• Extending the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist for health equity
• Extending the risk of bias tool to allow for assessment of non-randomised studies, cluster-randomised trials and cross-over trials: a Cochrane methods innovation fund project
• Extending the search to find ongoing and unpublished trials – A survey of methods and results of Cochrane reviews
• Extending treatment ranking in network meta-analysis to account for clinical experience on treatment performance and credibility of the evidence
• Extensive consumer/stakeholder engagement leads to practical key messages
• Extent and handling of missing dichotomous outcome data for participants in 672 trials included in 100 Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews
• Extent and handling of missing dichotomous outcome data in 100 Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews
• Extent of dissemination bias from research inception to manuscript submission: meta-analysis of cohort studies of publication bias
• Extent of missing outcome data for participants in trials included in five Cochrane systematic reviews: a descriptive analysis
• Extent of publication bias in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees and included in trial registries
• External validity and generalizability of systematic reviews in primary health care: Adapting the methodology to conduct the review
• External validity of definition of rehabilitation in health
• External validity of randomized controlled trials: a sample survey of hypertension trials in China
• Extracting clinically relevant messages from drug class review
• Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomised studies
• Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomised studies
• Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomised studies (NRS) of a public health intervention
• Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomized studies (NRS) of a public health intervention
• Extraction error or interpretation: A case study of event data extraction in systematic reviews from three high-impact, high-quality peer-reviewed sources
• Extraction of estimates of prognostic association for meta-analysis: simulation methods as good alternatives to trend and direct method estimation
• Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analysis
• Extreme Findings in Early Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
• Eye-acupuncture as adjunctive therapy for stroke: a bibliometric analysis of clinical studies
• F1000Prime - powering the search of science
• Face-to-face training for developing countries: do they come or should we go?
• Facial sensory alterations and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): challenges and limitations when bringing the patient perspective
• Facilitated access to healthcare evidence-based information to promote better communication between consumers and professionals
• Facilitating Access To Information: Recommendations for a Patient-Friendly Clinical Trial Registry-India
• Facilitating collaboration between Cochrane Fields and Review Groups: a case study
• Facilitating evidence-informed decisions about complex interventions
• Facilitating evidence-informed health policymaking: the SUPPORT tools
• Facilitating global collaborations for pregnancy and pediatric biomarker research through a biobank database: the COPPER project
• Facilitating optimized decision-making using a knowledge user driven synthesis approach in a scoping review of social frailty interventions
• Facilitating research on research using SWAR (studies within a review) and SWAT (studies within a trial)
• Facilitating the implementation of evidence through a structured programme: the Joanna Briggs Institute Clinical Fellowship programme
• Facilitative role of Fields: case study of topic prioritisation and reviewer support for production of global health promotion and public health review priorities
• Facilitators and barriers of knowledge translation and implementation: Based on the experience of translating and disseminating Cochrane evidence in China
• Facilitators and barriers to modern contraception use among reproductive-aged (15-49) women living in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review protocol
• Facilitators and barriers to successful collaboration in guideline development: experiential insights of collaborative guideline developers
• Facilitators, barriers, and strategies for health-system guidance implementation: a protocol for a critical interpretive synthesis
• Facility-imposed barriers to early utilisation of focused antenatal care services in Mangochi District, Malawi – A mixed-methods assessment
• Facing the Evidence-Based Medicine and Guidelines era: what is the role of the academic institutions?
• Factors Affecting the Interpretation of Meta-analysis
• Factors associated with results and conclusions of drug-drug comparisons: or why some statins appear more efficacious than others
• Factors associated with the timely completion of a Cochrane review
• Factors influencing community engagement in infectious disease clinical trials in Africa: findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis and stakeholder interviews
• Factors influencing the implementation of mental health recovery into services: A mixed studies systematic review
• Factors predicting benefit from maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Factors related to biases of randomized controlled trials published from Japan
• Factors that Predict the Influence of Systematic Overviews on Policy Decisions among Public Health Decision-Makers in Ontario: Multiple Logistic and Linear Regression Analyses
• Failure to conceal treatment allocation schedules in controlled trials influences estimates of treatment effects
• Falls prevention strategies among acute internal medicine unit inpatients in a university hospital: A best-practice implementation project
• False positive findings in cumulative meta-analysis with and without application of trial sequential analysis
• Far too many excluded studies listed in Cochrane reviews
• Faster may not be better: data abstraction for systematic reviews
• Feasibility of a "one-product" guideline for health and social care professionals and members of the public
• Feasibility of developing and validating a geographic filter for a small country like Austria
• Feasibility of establishing a central repository for the individual participant data from research studies
• Feasibility of fast track systematic review for policy makers: Interchangeability between pneumococcal conjugate vaccines
• Feasibility of recruitment and training of carers of people with dementia as a route to Cochrane-NHS engagement
• Feasibility scans could improve prioritization and selection of systematic review topics
• Feedback on Cochrane Reviews: how much is there and what happens to it?
• Feedback on Covidence by systematic reviewers
• Feeding the high-risk newborn and supplementation - A systematic review
• Female authorship in systematic reviews: does The Cochrane Collaboration support gender equity?
• Female condom introduction and sexually transmitted disease Prevalence: A community intervention trial in Kenya
• Female genital mutilation in Africa: scoping the landscape of evidence
• Ferrets and MeerKats!
• Fewer randomized controlled trials in fertility and gynecology field: why is this happening?
• Fighting organized crime: the power of systematic searching
• Filled Gaps? Data after a year of the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry efforts to increase understanding and awareness of the child-focused clinical trial landscape
• Filling the gap in the body of knowledge as to the local treatment of poorly healing wounds
• Filling the Gaps: The World Health Organization and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry efforts to combat an unclear child-focused clinical trial landscape
• Filtering by focusing - the re-scoping process for BMJ Clinical Evidence
• Filtering for findability in systematic review search strategies
• Filtering the information overload from systematic reviews with 'Summary of findings' tables
• Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
• Financial conflicts of interest and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies
• Financial health equity. Intervention for balance and financial stability of institutions providing national health, health promoters and insurers
• Financial incentive policies for obesity prevention in worksite employees: a systematic review
• Financial incentive policies for obesity prevention in worksite employees: a systematic review of equity and information sufficiency
• Financial relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and patient and consumer representatives and their organizations in health: a systematic review
• Finding a balance between comprehensive evidence synthesis relevant for policy, practice and guideline development and challenging time constraints
• Finding a common language to communicate test accuracy evidence: public, clinician and media perspectives
• Finding a Haystack Among the Needles: Making Health Promotion and Public Health Reviews in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Available to Policy Makers
• Finding and sharing the crime-reduction evidence base: the development and delivery of the Crime Reduction Toolkit
• Finding best available evidence in a time of crisis
• Finding evidence for alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review
• Finding evidence from developing countries: the use of regional databases and other search sources
• Finding full text copies of randomised trials, or possible randomised trials, from low and middle income countries
• Finding literature: pinpoint latest developments vs. thorough searches
  
• Finding lost trials together using Cochrane Crowd and the Evidence Pipeline
• Finding public health evidence for intervention reviews: evaluating the role of bibliographic databases alongside supplementary search methods
• Finding public health evidence: how many stones need to be turned?
• Finding public health evidence: How many stones need to be turned?
• Finding qualitative literature on dementia in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL: assessment of three qualitative search filters
• Finding research gaps when not looking for them
  
• Finding research on websites—experiences and solutions from the field of international development
• Finding solutions to challenging and complex Cochrane Reviews: the National Institute for Health Research Complex Reviews Support Unit (NIHR CRSU)
• Finding stroke evidence: where and how far do clinicians have to look?
• Finding systematic reviews on pain: building the KSR Pain Evidence database
• Finding systematic reviews: can Epistemonikos replace the Cochrane Library?
• Finding the evidence gaps in Acute Respiratory Infections: an analysis of systematic reviews and RCTs
• Finding the gold: identifying good quality systematic reviews for the Cancer Specialist Library
• Finding the largest pool of relevant citations in MEDLINE using the Pearl Harvesting Information Retrieval Theory
• Finding, critically appraising, and using a core outcome set (COS) to inform your systematic review
• Findings of clinical research cannot be predicted in advance: an empirical study of cancer trials
• First and second year effects in calcium-bone density trials
• First do no harm: how can systematic reviewers do justice to harms? Deciding which harms to search for and how
• First do no harm: how can systematic reviewers do justice to harms? Deciding which harms to search for and how
• First do no harm: how can systematic reviews do justice to adverse effects? The challenges of deciding which adverse effects to search for and how
• First line malaria treatment in Africa: evidence, policy and practice
• First province in Canada to provide access to The Cochrane Library: lessons learned
• First results of a Systematic Review of Meta-analyses on the Efficacy of SSRI and SNRI in the Treatment of Major Depression
• Fit-for-use evidence on benefits and harms when adoloping guidelines: the complexities of decisions to use, update, or do new reviews
• FIT-Nursing Care - an evidence-based knowledge platform for nurses
• Fitting a square peg in a round hole: Developing a quality assessment tool for non-randomized studies in public health
• Fitting a square peg into a round hole: adapting Cochrane methods to conduct a methods review
• Five aspects of research waste: a scoping review
• Five evidence ‘game changers’ in 2013 and what this means for Cochrane Reviews
• Fixed and random effect models when one trial dominates metaanalysis results
• Fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses - why not meet in the middle?
• Flexible models for network meta-analysis of survival data
• Fluoride therapy to prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis
• Focus EMTREE terms vs. Non-focused EMTREE terms to search for clinical drug trials in EMBASE
• Focus on registered studies, adequately powered analyses and true data: filter unreliable evidence from Cochrane Reviews!
• Follow-up or change scores: does it matter which outcome is used in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?
• Following diagnostic test accuracy protocol to publications: a retrospective cohort study
• Following diagnostic-test accuracy protocol to publications: A retrospective cohort study
• Following up on the evidence: creating an organisational repository of included studies in systematic reviews
• Food environment framework in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative systematic review
• Food fortification programs' cost-effectiveness to reduce global malnutrition: A systematic review of economic analyses from over 50 countries
  
• Food-based dietary guidelines: methods used to synthesise evidence and grade recommendations
• Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke
• Forecasting the future publication rate of dementia-related systematic reviews
• Forecasting yesterday’s weather: The risk of spectrum bias from the inclusion of already diagnosed/treated patients in studies of depression screening tools
• FORMAL CONSENSUS AS A TOOL FOR AGREEMENT IN EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS AND STANDARDIZATION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
• Formal consensus methods in evidence-based clinical care protocols development: A systematic review
• Formal criteria for establishing equivalence in meta-analysis Of randomized clinical trials
• Formalising the use of evidence synthesis to designing future research coherently and efficiently: a framework proposal
• Formulating recommendations to increase appropriateness and efficiency in healthcare: the MAPAC initiative
• Formulation an implementation research on the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infection in PICU using the i-PARIHS framework：a pre-post study
• Forward Together: An Evidence-Based Practice Partnership
• Forward together: new ways to participate in Cochrane
• Fostering a new generation of diverse researchers: the AAO-HNSF Cochrane Scholars Program
• Fostering evidence-informed decision-making in resource-constrained settings through interactive participation learning
  
• Fostering patients' involvement in patient-directed evidence communication
• Fostering self-management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions in physiotherapy care: A best practice implementa-tion project
  
• Fostering the evidence-based methodology in clinical practice guidelines development in the Czech healthcare system
• Found in translation: translation of clinical trial reports for inclusion in Cochrane Airways’ systematic reviews
• Four framework synthesis approaches to using theory in knowledge production
• Four systematic reviews per day: the epidemiology of research synthesis
• Four years’ feedback submitted through The Cochrane Library: what happened to it?
• Four-stage model of effective consumer participation
• Fragility index for assessing the robustness of randomized controlled trials
• Framework for analysis of the factors influencing the adoption of new technologies in health care
• Framework for evaluating reporting bias in network meta-analysis
• Framework for translating knowledge into practice for diabetes prevention and control
• Framework synthesis of 82 systematic reviews suggests narrative syntheses and meta-analyses use different approaches to argumentation
• Framework to improve the uptake of evidence in health policymaking in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region
  
• Frameworks for critical thinking about treatment claims, comparisons, and choices: a mapping review
• Frameworks for moving from evidence to decision in clinical practice guideline handbooks: a systematic evaluation study