• Generalizability of evidence from randomized controlled trials published in the leading medical journals
• Generalizability of findings from efficacy trials for chronic depression: an analysis of eligibility criteria
• Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the leading general medical journals
• Generalizability of results from randomized trials; A systematic overview of possible approaches
• GENERATE: Setting the agenda for cross-collaborative, high value research in ENT hearing and balance
• Generating an interactive database for international collaboration on a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy-review
• Generating empirical evidence to support methods for overviews of reviews
• Generation of quality indicators based on systematic reviews
• Generation of quality of care indicators based on systematic reviews
• Genetic discrimination today - the empirical evidence
• Genetic risk factors for complex diseases: race is not important
• Geographic and language distribution of trials in Cochrane Systematic Reviews related to acupuncture
• Geographic distribution of trials in Cochrane system­atic reviews
• Geriatric Depression Scale-4 and Geriatric Depression Scale-5 for screening of depression among older adults: a systematic review
• German translation activities for Cochrane content 2014 to 2018: achievements and developments
• GESI-SPARK-K2P workshop: making systematic reviews impactful and responsive to stakeholders’ needs through knowledge translation strategies and tools
• Get the picture! New guidance on choosing images for sharing Cochrane evidence
• Getting best current evidence into practice through a web-based authoring and publication platform: qualitative study of technological barriers and solutions
• Getting Cochrane Hypertension evidence into Wikipedia
• Getting Cochrane into schools
• Getting malaria research to consumers: An evaluative study
• Getting read: using a journalistic newsletter format in a long-term endeavour to promote critical thinking among healthcare decision-makers and health professionals
• Getting ready for RevMan Web
• Getting research into practice: women-centred obstetric care
• Getting to grips with complexity in complex interventions
• Ghana country priorities influence Cochrane Review and World Health Organization Global Guidelines
• Give me the ‘C’! How to define the comparator in a prognostic factor systematic review
• Give me the ‘C’! How to define the comparator in a prognostic factor systematic review
• Giving a prominent role to methodologists with GRADE expertise in a clinical practice guideline: a qualitative exploration
• Giving Brazilian women access to evidence based information in Portuguese: The translation of Pregnancy and Childbirth Group PLS
• Giving European SLRs the upper hand: Are manual searches of local journals necessary?
• Glaucoma drug trials: Why 349 trials and 130 unique interventions?
• Global ageing: Defining the evidence agenda. Towards 2020, the WHO decade of Healthy Ageing: A Cochrane-Campbell response 
• Global burden of chronic postsurgical pain following breast cancer surgery: a systematic review of 188 observational studies with 300,906 patients
• Global burden of eye disease in 2010 and systematic reviews and protocols in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
• Global burden of heart disease in 2010 and systematic reviews and protocols in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
• Global burden of mental and behavioral disorders as reflected in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an introduction
• Global burden of skin disease in 2010 and systematic reviews and protocols in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
• Global estimates of brain drain and deficit
• Global evidence, local adaptation (GELA): Enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa
• Global Evidence, Local Adaptation: Integrated Knowledge Translation strategies to enhance evidence-informed newborn and child health guidelines in three African countries
• Global evidence, local needs: Lessons from practical philosophy about using different knowledge
• Global evidence, local research: A country map of included studies from Cochrane systematic reviews
• Global evidence, local research: a country map of included studies from Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Global Health Scorecard
• Global health, science and regulatory knowledge at the World Health Organization
• Global hotspots and future prospects of CAR T-Cell therapy in cancer research: a bibliometric analysis
• Global input into Review Groups - an example
• Global malaria treatment guidelines: Cochrane response to WHO guideline panel
• Global production of systematic reviews on population health issues in the Middle East and North Africa: preliminary results of a systematic overview and bibliometric analysis
• Globalising knowledge translation: experiences from the evidence to action thematic working group
• Globalizing evidence, localizing implementation for colorectal cancer screening guidelines
• Glossary of Evaluation Terms for Informed Treatment choices in plain language (GET-IT)
• Glycated hemoglobin and risk of mortality in dialysis patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
• Going beyond MEDLINE - what information might reviewers find from searching databases of adverse drug reactions?
• Going from evidence to dis-coverage decisions
• Going mobile with Cochrane Reviews
• Good news about bad news: Improvements in attention to adverse effects in Cochrane reviews (1997-2007) and future challenges
• Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science: effective, but how do they really work?
• Google searching: a consistency test
• Googling for grey: using Google and Duckduckgo to find grey literature
• Governance arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
• GRADE and summary of findings workshop: interpreting results of Cochrane Reviews using GRADE
• GRADE application in values and preferences evidence
• GRADE approach for determining certainty of evidence on how patients value outcomes – Patient Outcome Importance Workshop II
• GRADE for Network Meta-Analysis: a New Framework for Reporting and Interpreting Results
• GRADE for preclinical animal studies: translating evidence from bench to bedside
• GRADE guidance for addressing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in meta-analysis: a practical application
• GRADE guidance for assessing risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in meta-analysis
• GRADE guidance for rating the certainty of a body of evidence describing the relative importance of outcomes or values and preferences
• GRADE in Cochrane systematic reviews: An investigation
• GRADE in summary of findings tables: how to formulate informative footnotes on the assessment of the quality of evidence
• GRADE Interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) frameworks: a tool to help decision makers to use evidence systematically when making decisions or recommendations
• GRADE target of certainty rating and implications for judgements regarding imprecision
• GRADE Working Group recommendations for evaluation accuracy of the water-swallow test for dysphagia in cases with stroke
• GRADE: Grading quality of evidence about scales used for measuring factors in medicine
• GRADE: indirectness and contextualising guidelines in a different culture. The impact of regrading the evidence
• GRADE: reasons for downgrading the quality of evidence in recent Cochrane Reviews
• Graded grains make finer findings: appraising the quality of a wide range of research methods
• Grades of Recommendation from Levels of Evidence: Are You Confused Yet?
• Grading articles and grading evidence: issues for evidence-based practice activities
• Grading confidence in the estimates of test accuracy and preparing 'Summary of findings' tables for diagnostic reviews
• Grading evidence and recommendations: Randomised experimental evaluation of four grading systems
• Grading of recommendations in intensive care unit guidelines: A scoping review of existing methodological approaches
• Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): an international working group
• Grading systems and evidence types of recommendations in traditional Chinese medicine guidelines: A systematic review
• Grading the quality of evidence and preparing summary of findings tables for diagnostic tests
• Grading the quality of evidence and preparing summary of findings tables for diagnostic tests
• Grading the quality of evidence in concise evidence summaries: experience from EBM Guidelines
• Grading the quality of evidence in existing systematic reviews: challenges and considerations
• Graphic display for effective reporting of evidence quality tables
• Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot for assessing the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis
• Graphical plots for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis
• Graphical presentation of diagnostic information: a methodological review
• Graphical representation of overlap degree of primary studies in systematic reviews included in overviews
• Graphs in meta-analysis: worth more than a thousand words?
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis: a hands-on tutorial in STATA
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis: a hands-on tutorial in STATA ***In computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Grey literature in systematic reviews: a practical approach to searching and including in systematic reviews
• Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations
• Growing the evidence base to advance respectful maternity care: How effective implementation science partnerships can move evidence into action
• Growing the North West Coast Cochrane Support Network
• Growth and development of the South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials
• Growth of Cochrane activity and evidence-based practice in Malaysia: the impact of the SEA-ORCHID project
• Guidance for conducting and reporting equity-related systematic reviews
• Guidance for conducting and reporting equity-related systematic reviews
• Guidance for conducting overviews of reviews: results from a scoping review and qualitative metasummary
• Guidance for including non-randomised studies (NRS) in Cochrane reviews: conclusions from an invited workshop
• Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: A scoping review update
• Guidance for the systematic review of economic evidence
• Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a comparison of guidance-led narrative synthesis versus meta-analysis
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 1
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 2
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews: criteria and principles for selecting systematic reviews to answer guideline clinical questions
• Guideline on multimorbidity of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM)
• Guideline use behaviours and needs of primary-care practitioners in China: A cross-sectional survey
• Guidelines – improving quality, or providing care with fewer resources? Or both?
• Guidelines and postpartum mothers’ behaviour concerning antibiotic therapy and bacterial resistance
• Guidelines for conducting and reporting reviews of reviews: Dealing with topic relevance and double-counting
• Guidelines for end-user peer review of Cochrane reviews and protocols - with a view to clinical guidelines
• Guidelines for preparing Cochrane reviews relevant to developing countries
• Guidelines for rare diseases: Why are they so difficult to develop?
• Guidelines for reporting adverse effects in clinical trials should be improved - lessons from acute pain
• Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions
• Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions: evaluating their use in practice
• Guidelines of antiretroviral therapies for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV: to promote the development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines
• Gynaecological Cancer Group - NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme
• Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than two years after the protocol
• Hand searching of Finnish medical journals
• Hand-searching for studies other than randomised trials
• Handling missing data in a randomized controlled trial: example from an Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) trial
• Handling missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: systematic survey of the methods literature
• Handling multiple outcome measures
• Handling trial participants with missing data in meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes: guidance for systematic reviewers
• Handling trial participants with missing dichotomous outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a methodological survey of proposed approaches
• Handling trial participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: systematic survey of the methods literature
• Handsearch and electronic search projects in Japan
• Handsearching and description of controlled clinical trials in Spanish language dental journals
• Handsearching and descriptive analysis of controlled clinical trials published in Geriatrics biomedical journals in Spain and Latin America
• Handsearching and descriptive analysis of controlled clinical trials published in neurology biomedical journals in Spain
• Handsearching for 'buried' randomized trials in Bahrain medical journals
• Handsearching for health promotion and public health trials and systematic reviews
• Handsearching for reports of diagnostic test accuracy studies: adding to the evidence base
• Handsearching in german paediatric journals
• Handsearching of randomised clinical trials published in Spanish journals in ophthalmology
• Handsearching online journals - do we need new rules?
• Handsearching respiratory conference abstracts: a comparison with abstracts identified by an EMBASE search
• Handwash versus handrub practices for preventing nosocomial infection in hospital intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• Haploidentical versus matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Hard times: consideration of the resource impact of recommendations
• Hard-to-reach and difficult-to-define: searching for 'hidden’ populations. An example from public health
• Harmonising clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making
• Harmonising Cochrane content in the CRS: moving towards a nimble global dataset
• Harmonising Cochrane content: the CRS, the Cochrane Linked Data project and HarmoniSR
• Harmonising routinely collected HIV-cascade-related data to strengthen monitoring and evaluation and support service management
• Harmonization of explanations for common judgments about the quality of evidence in summary of findings tables
• Harnessing the efficiencies of machine learning and Cochrane Crowd to identify randomised trials for individual Cochrane Reviews
• Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals can be bizarrely narrow when heterogeneity is very low
• Has completeness and quality of systematic review and meta-analysis reporting in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Subtitle: is completeness of reporting associated with study quality?
• Hazard ratios in the Summary of Findings table: experience of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group
• HBsAg level is an important predictor of HCC in low risk HBV carriers: evidence-based analysis
• Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre: Mapping policy evidence-needs to support evidence-based decision-making
• Health behaviour change
• Health care outcomes assessed with non-experimental designs compared with those assessed in randomised trials
• Health care seeking for maternal and newborn illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies
• Health economics methods: from effectiveness to efficiency in systematic reviews
• Health Emergency Interim Guidelines: Designing a tool-kit for WHO
• Health equity and patients included: implications for systematic reviews
• Health equity and patients included: implications for systematic reviews
• Health Equity: Implications for Systematic Reviews
• Health in my Language: Are health domain adapted machine translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries more useful to readers than having no translation in their language?
• Health in my Language: Can post-editing of health domain adapted machine translation speed up translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries, and do translators like it?
• Health in my language: Evaluating health-domain adapted machine translation for Cochrane plain language summaries
• Health in my Language: evaluation of health domain adapted machine translation for Cochrane Reviews
• Health in my Language: health domain adapted machine translation as a means to tackle the resource issues for translation
• Health incident management system: SIGIS
• Health policy integrating with systematic reviews
• Health priority research questions based on evidence in Brazil: implementation and maintenance of free access web site for researchers, academics, health professionals and consumers
• Health promotion, public health and the health of young people: a systematic map of inequalities research
• Health related quality of life in ovarian carcinoma: methodological issues in randomised controlled trials
• Health related quality of life measured by SF-36 for adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis
• Health Systems Evidence: the development of a ‘one-stop-shop’ of health systems research evidence to support policymaking
• Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in health services: The Sentinel Network as a forum for Evidence Based Health
• Health Technology Assessment in India: a beginning for healthcare decision making
• Health Technology Assessment of Dialysis Membranes: Baseline Report
• Health Technology Assessment of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Induced Abortion: Baseline Report
• Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: A qualitative evidence synthesis
• Healthy work environments: the experience of conducting a series of comprehensive systematic reviews, including the review of qualitative research and non-research data
• Help! Where do I begin? A troubleshooting guide to updating a Cochrane intervention review as a new review author
• Helping Cochrane Reviews soar: a workshop to create a communication and dissemination strategy for every Cochrane Review
• Helping doctors to understand screening tests
• Helping ministers and senior officials understand Cochrane evidence
• Helping readers understand review update status: Pilot of a simple system
• Helping the cause of trusted evidence: the work of Cochrane Germany, Austria and Switzerland
• Helping to ensure review relevance: exploring the potential benefits and costs of multi-perspective review advisory groups
• Hepatitis A immunisation in South Africa: Using Cochrane reviews as a part of decision-making
• Heterogeneity and complexity within reviews of social research: the perspective of ‘divergent’ reviews
• Heterogeneity estimates fluctuate according to the number of pooled trials