• The impact of mental health and psychosocial support programmes on people affected by humanitarian crises: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The impact of modified intention-to-treat reporting randomised trials in meta-analyses 2013 Québec City
• The Impact of Parenting Programs on Adolescent Mental Health, Positive Development, and the Parent–Adolescent Relationship 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The impact of patients’ and health care professionals’ voices in clinical guidelines – integrating qualitative evidence in clinical guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The impact of public comments on the development of methodology standards for patient-centred outcomes research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The impact of publication bias and small study effects on the efficacy and ranking of antipsychotics 2015 Vienna
• The impact of selective searching on the results of systematic reviews 2015 Vienna
• The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction in German primary care 2008 Freiburg
• The impact of studies from a trial register for the results of systematic review: a survey of Cochrane reviews 2015 Vienna
• The impact of studies from trial registries on the results of systematic review: a survey of Cochrane Reviews 2016 Seoul
• The impact of systematic reviews on health care policy 2011 Madrid
• The Impact of the Collaboration on China: Chinese Cochrane Centre Developing with the Collaboration 2002 Stavanger
• The impact of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine 2014 Hyderabad
• The Impact of the problem-based learning /community-based education curriculum on the cognitive function of UNITRA medical students 2000 Cape Town
• The impact of trial registration on assessing selective reporting bias in Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
• The impact of underpowered studies in meta-analyses reported by Cochrane Reviews 2011 Madrid
• The impact of using EMBASE in addition to PubMed and other databases during regional activity-based health technology assessment (HTA) 2012 Auckland
• The impact of utilizing implications for practice in Cochrane systematic reviews on patient care in obstetrics 2008 Freiburg
• The IMPACT realist review on interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: key findings and methodological lessons 2016 Seoul
• The impacts of financial literacy interventions for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises on welfare and firm performance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The imperfect balance between investment and payback from presenting Cochrane reviews to lay people: the PartecipaSalute experience 2007 Sao Paulo
• THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A LEARNING SYSTEM FOR EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES FOR PSYCHOSIS IN QUEBEC 2020 Abstracts
• The implementation of an integrated approach to guidance prioritisation at NICE 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The implementation of clinical guidelines in an academic medical centre 1997 Amsterdam
• The implementation of clinical practice guidelines: The Tunisian experience 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The implementation of clinically effective stroke services in the UK 1997 Amsterdam
• The implementation of policy to manage potentially problematic studies in Cochrane review updates – a meta-epidemiological study 2023 London
• The implications for meta-analysis of different methods of analysing count data 2011 Madrid
• The implications of different intervention definitions on a network meta-analysis of acupuncture and other physical therapies for the relief of chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee 2011 Madrid
• The importance of a multidisciplinary expert panel when evidence is scarce: example of guidelines for psychosocial support after traumatic events 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The importance of a multidisciplinary team in developing an evidence-based guideline on first aid for road traffic injuries in Africa 2023 London
• The importance of a systematic search strategy 1997 Amsterdam
• The importance of context: how can evidence-based knowledge best be presented to clinicians in the mental health field? 2005 Melbourne
• The importance of critical revision of translated abstracts 2015 Vienna
• The importance of implementation evaluation. Case study of a review on preschool feeding programmes to improve the health of disadvantaged young children 2013 Québec City
• The importance of minimal important differences to inform systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: an example 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The importance of process evaluation: a tale of two reviews 2014 Hyderabad
• The importance of registration for systematic reviews/meta-analysis about traditional Chinese medicine in Chinese 2015 Vienna
• The importance of the assessment of selective cross-over in randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews 2016 Seoul
• The importance pf Cochrane for medical students in Syria 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The improved Systematic Review Data Repository Plus (SRDR+): A free, “FHIR-ed up” tool for screening, data extraction, and data sharing 2023 London
• The inclusion of the estimated inter-study variation into forest plots for random-effects meta-analyses - a suggestion for a graphical representation 2006 Dublin
• The Individual Participant Data (IPD) Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomized controlled trials 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The inefficiency of isolation: Why evidence providers and evidence synthesisers can break out of their silos 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence in clinical care by Evidence-based Medicine after the 1-year course training 2010 Keystone
• The influence of bias in randomised controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of RCTs: An updated systematic review 2011 Madrid
• The Influence of Environmental Taxes on Income Distribution: A Meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of funding source on study characteristics in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of industry sponsorship and other financial conflicts of interest on the outcomes and quality of systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of mortality time-points on pooled effect estimates in critical care meta-analyses 2015 Vienna
• The influence of pet therapy in anxiety reduction among undergraduate nursing students 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of pharmaceutical companies on guidelines—two examples from Germany 2013 Québec City
• The influence of poverty alleviation on climate change: A meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The influence of study characteristics on methodological and reporting quality of dose-response meta-analysis: a cross-sectional study 2018 Edinburgh
• The information need in systematic review and meta-analysis about acupuncture 2015 Vienna
• The information overload: how physicians search for information to manage information needs of their patients 2019 Santiago
• The innovative approach to evaluating the correlations between domains of clinical practice guideline for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Inspiration from Cochrane Library: A Proposal for Publishing Research Protocol in Chinese Biomedical Journals 2002 Stavanger
• The instrument for measuring the implementation situation of Traditional Chinese Medicine guideline: Evaluation and application 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The integration among clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and health technology assessments 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The integrity of unclear reported RCTs during selection period of systematic review: a telephone interview survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The interaction between structured digital systematic reviews and guidelines: shaping the future. A workshop in collaboration with GINTech and GRADETech 2016 Seoul
• The International Collaborative Group on Clinical Trial Registries: aims and achievements 1994 Hamilton
• The international distribution of RCTs in Cochrane dementia intervention reviews 2011 Madrid
• The International Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Database (IQOD). Reference values of the PGWBI on 8536 subjects 2004 Ottawa
• The interobserver reliability in the assessment of methodological quality of RCTs and CCTs in the addiction field 2005 Melbourne
• The Inverse Research Law – the least evidence from settings where need is greatest. An overview of reviews of interventions to reduce the risk of preterm births and their generalisability to low- and middle-income settings 2019 Santiago
• The investigation on evidence support of proprietary Chinese medicine in 2015 National List of Essential Medicines 2016 Seoul
• The invisible mechanism of engagement: a realist review of social and emotional wellbeing programs for Australian Aboriginal children and youth 2010 Keystone
• The ISSG Search Filter Resource: improving the efficiency and quality of searches for studies for systematic reviews 2023 London
• The Italian IN-DEEP project - integrating and deriving evidence, experiences and preferences: developing research-based health information applicable to decision making and self-management by people with multiple sclerosis 2013 Québec City
• The James Lind Library: a free, multilingual web-based resource for public and professional education 2008 Freiburg
• The JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The journey from prioritised reviews to publication (or not!) 2015 Vienna
• The journey from working group to guidelines, via evidence: Ensuring equity of access to rehabilitation for people with stroke 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The judicialisation of health in Brazil: a huge challenge that calls for innovative solutions 2018 Edinburgh
• The known knowns and known unknowns: A database of knowledge clusters and knowledge gaps in environmental management 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The lack of sex disaggregated data as a challenge to the review process: the case of a review of peer-based interventions for HIV positive women 2006 Dublin
• The landscape of clinical trial activity focusing on indigenous health in Australia from 2008 to 2018 2019 Santiago
• The landscape of clinical trial activity focusing on Indigenous health in Australia from 2008-2018 2020 Abstracts
• The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality 2016 Seoul
• The language of evidence 2005 Melbourne
• The language restrictions and handsearching: a comparative analysis of meta analysis of interventions published in Chinese academic journals and Cochrane Library 2012 Auckland
• The Leeds Outcomes Stakeholders Survey (LOSS) Study 2007 Sao Paulo
• The Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS) - introduction and outlook 2023 London
• The licorice allsorts approach: review and synthesis of a mixed bag of research 1996 Adelaide
• The limitation of word count in Chinese journals: a potential impediment for implementing the CONSORT statement 2013 Québec City
• The Living Overview of Evidence database (LOVE) may be more efficient than a traditional search of systematic reviews and randomized trials 2019 Santiago
• The longitudinal accumulated effects of mastery of stress of families to reduce their stress and PTSD through critical-care transition 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The majority of reporting guidelines development lack conducting the Delphi method: A systematic search of reporting guidelines 2020 Abstracts
• The Malnutrition in the Elderly (MaNuEL) Knowledge Hub: Tackling the increasing problem of malnutrition in older persons 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Master List of Journals Being Searched: where it’s been and where it’s going 2008 Freiburg
• The medical management of children who failed the Ewing hearing test: current practice compared to outcomes of RCTs 1997 Amsterdam
• The medical management of children who failed the Ewing hearing test: current practice compared to outcomes of RCTs 1997 Amsterdam
• The message: good communication of results (and caveats), and how to avoid Cochrane’s most common major errors 2014 Hyderabad
• The method of exracting data from figure with software 2012 Auckland
• the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China: A scoping review 2023 London
• The methodological quality of clinical pathways published in journals in China: 2014-2016 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic tests of MRI 2016 Seoul
• The methodological quality of the traditional Chinese medicine clinical pathway in China 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The methodological soundness of literature reviews addressing three potential zoonotic public health issues 2008 Freiburg
• The methodology and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a review 2018 Edinburgh
• The methods and strategies for patient and carer involvement in living guidelines: A qualitative study and co-production approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Methods for Research Synthesis node of the Economic and Social Research Council's National Centre for Research Methods: methodological challenges in evidence synthesis 2006 Dublin
• The methods of statistical analysis used in meta-epidemiological studies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The mixed methods appraisal tool for assessing studies with diverse designs: example from a systematic mixed studies review on the key processes and outcomes of participatory research with health organizations 2013 Québec City
• The moral dimensions of meta-analysis: a grounded theory of the meta-analytic process 2014 Hyderabad
• The multiplicity problem in systematic reviews 2005 Melbourne
• The MuSE Consortium: a strategy to equitably engage diverse stakeholders to create guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development 2019 Santiago
• The National Institute for Health Research Complex Reviews Support Unit (NIHR CRSU): supporting successful delivery of complex reviews 2016 Seoul
• The nature and quality of systematic reviews of prognostic studies 2020 Abstracts
• The nature and source of bias in review articles: the example of chronic fatigue syndrome 1996 Adelaide
• The need for better design and reporting of RCTs in a neglected but widespread skin disease 2008 Freiburg
• The need for systematic research in traditional Chinese medicine 2000 Cape Town
• The need to collaborate for updating systematic reviews 2005 Melbourne
• The need to improve 'Implications for research' sections in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
• The Norwegian electronic health library - helping Norwegian health professionals in accessing English language resources 2013 Québec City
• The not-so-systematic reviews: Challenges with misunderstanding definitions in environmental sciences 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The number needed to read: are capture-recapture techniques feasible in searching literature for systematic reviews? 2009 Singapore
• The number needed to treat in pairwise and network meta-analysis and its graphical representation 2018 Edinburgh
• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in China 2012 Auckland
• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in Nephrology 2010 Keystone
• The numerous typologies and taxonomies of evidence synthesis 2023 London
• The objectively-derived approach enables the development of high-quality search strategies for bibliographic databases 2015 Vienna
• The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative: Optimising the value of observational data 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The One World Alliance: ensuring relevance to countries with developing economies 1999 Rome
• The opinions of guideline developers towards automation in health research: a thematic analysis using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation 2019 Santiago
• The Optimize4MNH guideline process: state-of-the-art methods for building an evidence-based guideline for health systems 2012 Auckland
• The ORBIT Study: outcome reporting bias in trials – interviews with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes 2008 Freiburg
• The ORBIT study: outcome reporting bias in trials – inter­views with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes AU:Rebecca Smyth 2009 Singapore
• The organization of health technology assessment in a European perspective 1997 Amsterdam
• The Ottawa Decision Support Framework as a tool to bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine: preliminary results of an implementation study 2004 Ottawa
• The Ottawa panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (EBCPGs) for rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) 2004 Ottawa
• The outcomes studied by palliative care systematic reviews 2016 Seoul
• The output of a Masters of Science course in systematic Cochrane reviews 2004 Ottawa
• The PAHO report on the Venezuelan primary health care intervention Barrio Adentro 2008 Freiburg
• The People’s Review: a protocol for a systematic review powered by the public. 2023 London
• The performance of methodological filters for diagnostic studies in nephrology journals 2012 Auckland
• The perspective of patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project 2019 Santiago
• The perspective of people living with chronic heart failure on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project 2019 Santiago
• The perspective of people living with obesity on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project 2019 Santiago
• The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure: derivation and application 2015 Vienna
• The placebo effect dependent on time? - A meta-analysis 1997 Amsterdam
• The placebo response in neuropathic pain trials: It is not what you think 2011 Madrid
• The plain language summary: Cochrane's most valuable product? 2006 Dublin
• The Policy Liaison Initiative: increasing usability of The Cochrane Library for policy makers 2004 Ottawa
• The Polyglot Search Translator (PST): evaluation of a tool for improving searching in systematic reviews: a randomised cross-over trial 2018 Edinburgh
• The Possible Cochrane Neurological Network Newletter: an Information Channel to Diffuse the Cochrane Collaboration in the Neurological Field. 1999 Rome
• The potential of text mining to reduce screening workload in systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation 2013 Québec City
• The power of placebos 1996 Adelaide
• The power of storyboarding as an analytical tool in QES: From review to fieldwork to dissemination 2023 London
• The power of tailored messaging: Results from Canada's first randomized controlled trial of knowledge brokering 2007 Sao Paulo
• The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) training programme implementation in a city in South of Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The predictive validity of GRADE for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study 2015 Vienna
• The present and future use of text mining for study identification 2015 Vienna
• The present situation of systematic review training courses in China 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The present status of evidence based medicine (E.B.M.): how relevant is it for developing countries? 1997 Amsterdam
• The prestigious influence of the medical world on humanity and its development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The prevalence of frailty among patients with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The prevalence of outcome reporting bias in trials (the ORBITstudy) 2008 Freiburg
• The primary health care (PHC) experience with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in Saudi Arabia (SA) 2012 Auckland
• The prioritization of cost-effectiveness evidence for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Chile 2019 Santiago
• The PRISMA evaluate the reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses’ abstracts of cost-effectiveness of pregnancy mortality 2013 Québec City
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta analyses of nursing interventions published in China 2012 Auckland
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews of China health policy 2013 Québec City
• The PRISMA-IPD Statement: preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data 2015 Vienna
• The problems of a systematic reviewer in a developing country. 2000 Cape Town
• The problems with systematic reviews: working towards the solutions 2023 London
• The Process of Current Care Guideline for Developmental Coordination Disorder in Finland 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The processing of Cochrane Open Access 2014 Hyderabad
• The production of guidelines elaborated in the context of the Brazilian Public Health System in twelve years 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The production, preservation and dissemination of rescue evidence in the Wenchuan earthquake 2009 Singapore
• The progress of evidence-based healthcare in the National Health Service in England and Wales 1997 Amsterdam
• The PROGRESS-Plus framework for assessing the equity of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China 2012 Auckland
• The promise of hybrid designs for the evaluation of implementation efforts 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The propagation of best evidence: 23 years of Cochrane Brazil workshops 2019 Santiago
• The proportion of articles behind paywalls – a barrier to patient access? 2018 Edinburgh
• The proposed Cochrane agenda setting and priority setting methods group: establishing a research program 2011 Madrid
• The pros and cons of including abstracts in systematic reviews: findings from the Multiple Data Sources Study (MUDS) 2016 Seoul
• The protective measures for health-care workers during the outbreak of COVID-19: A rapid review 2020 Abstracts
• The provision of services in the UK for armed forces veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: a rapid evidence synthesis 2018 Edinburgh
• The Psychometric Assessment Project: an evaluation of psychometric measures used within Norwegian mental health services 2015 Vienna
• The Ptolemy Project: knowledge translation and equity in East Africa 2015 Vienna
• The public sector and the Cochrane Collaboration: potential and problems In the partnerships, and traps for young players 1999 Rome
• The public, the internet, and the media are the bridge between producers and users 2004 Ottawa
• The publication and methodological characteristics of network meta-analysis published in top medical journals: a cross-sectional survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The publishing characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews for social welfare 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for health policy research 2013 Québec City
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for nursing research 2013 Québec City
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews of dentistry and oral health by Chinese researchers 2018 Edinburgh
• The quality of Cochrane synopses - a quality assessment pilot project 2004 Ottawa
• The quality of economic studies in respiratory diseases in China by QHES tool 2013 Québec City
• The quality of evidence is a key determinant of strength of recommendations 2014 Hyderabad
• The quality of randomized clinical trials in surgery can be improved. A systematic review 2011 Madrid
• The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials abstracts is sub-optimal: a survey of four major general medical journals 2008 Freiburg
• The quality of reporting of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on peripartum antiretroviral therapies for preventing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV 2007 Sao Paulo
• The quality of systematic reviews of treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder 1995 Oslo
• The quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in the field of bariatrics: a cross-sectional systematic survey 2018 Edinburgh
• The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials 2013 Québec City
• The quality of trials in quality improvement: Systematic review of risk of bias in diabetes studies 2011 Madrid
• The quality survey of campbell systematic reviews using AMSTAR 2013 Québec City
• The quantity and quality of evidence of pandemic 2010 Keystone
• The quest for trials on the efficacy of human vaccines: results of the handsearch of the Vaccine journal 1995 Oslo
• The QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews 2006 Dublin
• The Rapid Response Service: Synthesized research evidence to inform HIV-related programs, services, and policies in Ontario 2020 Abstracts
• The rate of publication of randomized controlled trials is near-exponential (2.5 times increase/decade with >1.5 million computer listed trials). A new strategy is required to fufil the Cochrane Challenge 2011 Madrid
• The reality of unclear reported RCTs during selection period of systematic review: a telephone interview survey 2020 Abstracts
• The reference standard for diagnostic imaging test accuracy 2015 Vienna
• The regulatory process for drug approval needs independent meta-analytical evidence: is Cochrane a possible candidate? The case of psychotropic medicines 2023 London
• The rehabilitation definition for scientific research purposes by Cochrane Rehabilitation – first results 2020 Abstracts
• The relation between heterogeneity in diagnostic accu­racy, prevalence and patient characteristics: an illustration with individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) 2009 Singapore
• The relationship between risk of bias and effect size: randomized controlled trials 2011 Madrid
• The relationship between the external and internal validity of randomized controlled trials: a sample of hypertension trials from China 2014 Hyderabad
• The relationship between the type of rapid reviews and quality: in the background of COVID-19 2020 Abstracts
• The relationship between volunteerism and well-being in Veteran and military populations: A scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The relevance of Cochrane reviews to cancer priorities in Iran 2007 Sao Paulo
• The relevance of core outcome sets to systematic reviewers and guideline developers 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning 2020 Abstracts
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning 2019 Santiago
• The reliability and validity of estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized clinical trials 2010 Keystone
• The reliability, usability, and applicability of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS 2019 Santiago
• The reliability, usability, and utility of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS 2020 Abstracts
• The reporting and impact of surgeons’ expertise in randomized controlled trials of total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review 2018 Edinburgh
• The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analysis related to Interventions Published in the Leading Surgery Journals: Overview and Evidence Mapping 2020 Abstracts
• The reporting characteristic of qualitative study: a review 2013 Québec City
• The reporting characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews Using PRISMA - An update of 2013-2016 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting characteristics of WHO guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting guideline for an acupuncture systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study 2018 Edinburgh
• The reporting of guideline dissemination and implementation in WHO guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
• The reporting of items generation and consensus in reporting guidelines: a cross sectional study 2015 Vienna
• The reporting of meta-epidemiological studies: A cross-sectional study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting of research design of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in abstracts of Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews 2013 Québec City
• The reporting on adverse events of drug intervention versus non-drug intervention in meta-analyses: can we do better presentation? 2012 Auckland
• The reporting quality of acupuncture-related infections in Korean literature: a systematic review of case studies 2016 Seoul
• The reporting quality of clinical guidelines in China based on Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies in the urology literature 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The reporting quality of interventional animal experiments in Chinese journals based on the evaluated results of the Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines 2019 Santiago
• The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy published in high impact factor journals, based on the PRISMA-DTA statement 2018 Edinburgh
• The research about guidance of systematic review for clinical study 2012 Auckland
• The research progress of open-label placebo (OLP) and implications for future studies: a systematic survey 2020 Abstracts
• The Research Status of eHealth Literacy 2020 Abstracts
• The Research Status of the eHealth Literacy Scales 2020 Abstracts
• The return of the register: the UKCCCR Register of Cancer Trials 1997 Amsterdam
• The REVEAL guidance for searching prior evidence for new trials 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials 2023 London
• The rise and flaws of systematic reviews on climate change effects 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The rising importance of Cochrane systematic reviews in a Latin-American evidence-based journal 2005 Melbourne
• The risk of bias in Iranian randomized controlled trials included in Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomised clinical trial publications 2014 Hyderabad
• The risk-of-bias and standards of reporting of published randomized controlled trials of medical education (Med Ed) research 2011 Madrid
• The risk-of-bias profile of neonatal randomised-controlled trials in Cochrane reviews: are we better over the years? 2014 Hyderabad
• The RoB NMA Tool: development of a tool to assess risk of bias (RoB) in network meta-analysis (NMA) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The ROB-ME (Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence) tool: a new tool for assessing reporting biases in evidence syntheses 2018 Edinburgh
• The RobotSearch RCT classifier: ready for use? 2020 Abstracts
• The robustness of results on weight loss in trials on sibutramine – a comparison of results from unpublished study reports with the corresponding published reports 2010 Keystone
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC): review author experiences 2006 Dublin
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator: working practices 2006 Dublin
• The role of a new Cochrane systematic review examining community-wide interventions to increase physical activity 2012 Auckland
• The role of collaborative evidence networks in promoting and supporting evidence-based health care (EBHC) globally 2023 London
• The role of Emotions in Patient and Public Involvement in health research; A literature review and practice recommendations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The role of evidence in population based health outcome assessments by health authorities 1997 Amsterdam
• The role of evidence syntheses to support decision-making when evidence is rapidly evolving during a public health emergency 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Role of feeding programs in achieving Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) One and Two: The School and Preschool feeding exemplar 2010 Keystone
• The role of health consumers in learning health systems: scoping the literature 2020 Abstracts
• The role of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in systematic literature searches of Cochrane Reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The role of meta-analysis in assessing the scientific basis of lasers in medicine 1997 Amsterdam
• The role of meta-regression in Cochrane reviews 2008 Freiburg
• The role of patient involvement in the evidence-based research process: using systematic reviews to inform future research 2018 Edinburgh
• The role of patients reporting evidence. Pacientesonline: the site for patients, done by patients 2010 Keystone
• The role of prospective trials registration and trials registers in improving the design, conduct and reporting of randomized clinical trials from developing countries 2007 Sao Paulo
• The role of reviewer reflexivity: reflections from a mixed-method consultative systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The role of scoping reviews in guideline development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The role of specialist registers of trials in the age of the 'Mega-Register' 2000 Cape Town
• The role of student scholarships in Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
• The role of Systematic Reviews in Author Guidelines of Physiotherapy related medical journals - A meta study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The role of systematic reviews in meta-analyses: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics for the treatment of depression 1996 Adelaide
• The role of the medical information database in managing the East Japan disaster 2011 Madrid
• The Role of the NHS economic evaluation database (NHS EED) within the systematic review process 2000 Cape Town
• The Russian translation project and dissemination of Cochrane evidence: achievements and barriers as feedback from volunteer translators 2016 Seoul
• The safe use of LLMs for screening in systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The safety and effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review 2016 Seoul
• The scientific basis of cancer care: the discrepancy between research priorities and research efforts 1997 Amsterdam
• The scope and impact of Cochrane Reviews related to cancer 2016 Seoul
• The scope of empirical research in bioethics 1995 Oslo
• The search for guidelines: A comprehensive approach. 2000 Cape Town
• The selection of fixed- or random-effect models in recent published meta-analyses 2015 Vienna
• The sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index (SCI) 2011 Madrid
• The Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (SGAT-SR): user experience with 113 Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• The side-effects of digital game-based learning: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The size of the gap between research evidence and clinical practise: questionnaire survey on treatment of patients with liver disease 2004 Ottawa
• The snowball effect: promoting Cochrane evidence via social media 2014 Hyderabad
• The South Asian Cochrane Network: supporting reviewers in South Asia and contributing to the global Cochrane agenda 2005 Melbourne
• The SPARK tool to prioritize questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research 2018 Edinburgh
• The SPIRIT initiative: defining standard protocol items for randomised trials 2008 Freiburg
• The State of Research on Fertility for LGBTQ+ people: A scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada 1997 Amsterdam
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada 1997 Amsterdam
• The Stats Café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified) 2014 Hyderabad
• The stats café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified) 2013 Québec City
• The status of using GRADE in systematic reviews of health effects on climate change 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The straight leg raising test: meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy in radiculopathy 1998 Baltimore
• The strategies and measures of promoting improvement of the quality of clinical trials in China 2010 Keystone
• The strength of recommendation is weak for use of ShenXiong glucose injection in patients with AIS 2015 Vienna
• The Stroke Therapy Evaluation Progrannne(STEP): An Attempt To Introduce A Culture Of Evidence-Based Practice Into Stroke Rehabilitation. 1999 Rome
• The structure of research questions in rehabilitation randomized-controlled clinical trials: a methodological study 2020 Abstracts
• The study of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews of acupuncture 2013 Québec City
• The study of reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis on acupuncture 2012 Auckland
• The Study-Level Index of Confounding: a meta-analytic tool to enhance the utility of observational data for comparative effectiveness 2019 Santiago
• The Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for global policy making 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The suspension of radiotherapy for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients before and after evidence implementation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Sustainable Development Goals and Health Technology Assessment in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Sustainable Knowledge Platform for evidence synthesis product 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Symptomatic Treatment of The Cough in Whooping Cough 2002 Stavanger
• The synthesis of economic evidence to improve global policy and equity in healthcare decision-making, using systematic reviews with hierarchical decision matrices 2014 Hyderabad
• The Systematic Review Data Repository 2.0 (SRDR 2.0) – Summary data for end-users 2020 Abstracts
• The Systematic Review Toolbox: an updated resource to support evidence synthesis 2023 London
• The systematic reviews and meta-analyses on nutrition: a bibliometric analyses 2020 Abstracts
• The Systematic Reviews Training Unit: capacity building for the future 1997 Amsterdam
• The systematic use of evidence-based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision making in an international guideline project 2019 Santiago
• The TARCiS statement: guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The theoretical design of the Oncology Nurses Core Competencies Framework adapted to the Romanian sociocultural context 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Theory of Everything in Health Decision-Making: Step 2 2023 London
• The theory of planned behaviour applied to shared decision making behaviours: a systematic review 2013 Québec City
• The therapeutic drug management program: a collaborative initiative of teaching hospitals 2013 Québec City
• The time-series studies for health policy research in China 2015 Vienna
• The timing of outcome measurement is not usually defined in systematic review protocols registered in PROSPERO 2018 Edinburgh
• The top cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a bibliometric analysis 2020 Abstracts
• The top clinical research priorities in mental health: implementation and maintainance of a website with free access for researchers, academics, health professionals and consumers in Brazil 2018 Edinburgh
• The TRANSFER framework to assess transferability of systematic review findings 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The treatment of Spasmodic Dysphonia with Botulinum Toxin injection 2000 Cape Town
• The trend of life expectancy for people with disabilities in Taiwan 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The triple burden of malnutrition: Strengthening influential nutrition evidence synthesis, advocacy and leadership in LMICs for LMICs 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The triple C (consultation, collaboration and consolidation) model - a way forward to sustainability of evidence into practice 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The TRIPOD extension for reporting of prediction model studies using patient-level data from electronic healthcare records and meta-analysis 2019 Santiago
• The type and evaluation of evidence in clinical pathways 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The UK NHS HTA programme 1997 Amsterdam
• The UK NHS HTA programme 1997 Amsterdam
• The UK top 10 clinical research priorities in neuro-oncology 2015 Vienna
• The unique challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of cluster-randomized trials 2015 Vienna
• The update of the JBI critical appraisal tools for risk of bias assessment: rationale and justification 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The updated JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines in China 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review of the research evidence 2011 Madrid
• The UpPriority Tool: a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline’s questions 2019 Santiago
• The UpPriority Tool: Development of a prioritisation tool for updating clinical guideline questions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The urgent needs for building the capability of systematic reviews in the Asia Pacific countries 2010 Keystone
• The Use of "Grey Literature" in a Sub-set of Neurological Cochrane Reviews 1999 Rome
• The use of a Theory of Change model in a mixed-methods systematic review (MMSR): an example from the Development Aid sector. 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The use of an ordered multinomial logit model in network analysis: An example in psoriatic arthritis 2011 Madrid
• The use of artificial intelligence on adherence to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The use of Azoles in the treatment of allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis 2000 Cape Town
• The use of Cochrane abstracts on PDAs at the point-of-care: effect on clinical behavior 2005 Melbourne
• The use of Cochrane evidence and guidance in World Health Organization guidelines 2013 Québec City
• The use of Cochrane Reviews for decision making by a local public health department 2013 Québec City
• The use of Cochrane reviews in an African first-aid and prevention guideline for lay people 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The use of Cochrane Reviews in practice guidelines for Dutch GPs 2008 Freiburg
• The use of Cochrane Reviews in the development of a first aid guideline for daily practice 2016 Seoul
• The use of Cochrane reviews to inform clinical recommendations in the Danish National Clinical Guideline development 2020 Abstracts
• The use of Cochrane SR in the development of clinical practice guidelines. The case of syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections and other infections of the genital tract. 2012 2013 Québec City
• The use of Cochrane SR in the process of developing mental health guidelines produced in Brazil 2012 Auckland
• The use of collaborative writing applications in healthcare education - a scoping review 2013 Québec City
• The use of complementary checklists for data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies 2020 Abstracts
• The use of composite endpoints in clinical trials: a critical review 2006 Dublin
• The use of composite outcomes in neonatal trials: an analysis of Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• The use of content knowledge in the assessment of bias in trials 2015 Vienna
• The use of evidence and its contribution to action in Sexual and Reproductive Health: Lessons from Contribution mapping in Nigeria 2020 Abstracts
• The use of evidence based medicine in promoting the social acceptance of family planning in the Philippines 2005 Melbourne
• The use of evidence-based research (EBR) approach in reporting guidelines: a cross-sectional study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The Use of GRADE in Cochrane Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2020 Abstracts
• The use of GRADE in systematic reviews of observational studies 2015 Vienna
• The use of GRADE methods in World Health Organization (WHO) public health guidelines: distributions of strength of recommendations and confidence in estimates of effect 2013 Québec City
• The Use of GRADE Methods to Support the Recommendations for Health interventions in the World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Guidelines 2020 Abstracts
• The use of GRADE on dose-response meta-analysis in 2019: a cross-sectional study 2020 Abstracts
• The use of language methodology for disseminating Cochrane Evidence through Cochrane Corners: Cochrane Rehabilitation experience. 2019 Santiago
• The use of mhealth to promote women’s empowerment and gender equity in a rural health system in Burkina Faso 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The use of nature language processing (NLP) for rapid literature screening in the update of systematic reviews: a comparison of four different models 2020 Abstracts
• The use of non-randomized studies in the Cochrane reviews on drugs and alcohol 2005 Melbourne
• The use of Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials (ORBIT) classification in Cochrane Reviews 2016 Seoul
• The use of qualitative methods to assess impact of the knowledge broker mentoring program 2019 Santiago
• The use of statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts: for support rather than illumination 2015 Vienna
• The use Of symptom "Progression" instead Of "Response" as a potentially stable endpoint for systematic reviews Of clinical trials using subjective endpoints. 2000 Cape Town
• The use of synthesis methods in support of developing a new surveillance initiative 2011 Madrid
• The Use of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses When Designing and Reporting Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis 2020 Abstracts
• The use of systematic reviews by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians 1996 Adelaide
• The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: a systematic review 2014 Hyderabad
• The use of systematic reviews in the development of provincial public health mandatory guidelines and services 2000 Cape Town
• The use of systematic reviews to optimize blood donor selection: the example of dental care 2019 Santiago
• The use of the Cochrane database in teaching evidence-ased nedicine (EBM): Experiences in a developing country. 1999 Rome
• The use of the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework for the evaluation of multiple-intervention comparison for health decision making 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The use of trial protocols to assess risk of bias due to selective reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey 2010 Keystone
• The usefulness of different information sources for retrieving adverse effects data for a systematic review 2011 Madrid
• The usefulness of The Cochrane Library in the development of a systematic bibliography on employee health and work performance 2008 Freiburg
• The utility and relevance of the Cochrane database Of systematic reviews from a Maori health perspective 2000 Cape Town
• The utility for identification of best available evidence of a register of controlled studies that evaluate interventions to prevent alcohol-impaired driving 2010 Keystone
• The utility of systematic reviews for informing agri-food public health policy: a survey of Canadian policy makers 2013 Québec City
• The utilization of a machine learning tool to screen sources in a rapid scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The utilization of systematic review and meta-analysis in China 2010 Keystone
• The Validity of the McMurray Test and Joint Line Tenderness for Diagnosing Meniscal Lesions of the Knee: a Systematic Review 1999 Rome
• The value of author contact in determining risk of bias in included studies in a systematic review 2013 Québec City
• The value of Cochrane reviews for informing health decisions on optimal use of albumin 2023 London
• The value of Cochrane reviews in the clinical practice of university-based surgeons in a developing country 2005 Melbourne
• The value of searching multiple databases for guideline development 2008 Freiburg
• The value of stakeholder, patient and public contributions and knowledge of lived experience to the conduct and interpretation of empirical findings from synthesised evidence. 2020 Abstracts
• The WHO Reproductive Health Library: disseminating effectiveness information in developing countries 1997 Amsterdam
• The Winner, the First: Response Adaptive Randomization and its Platform Development 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The wisdom of Plantwise: An alternative extension programme to reduce plant health problems for smallholder farmers 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• The WISEST AI Project: an artificial intelligence decision support tool to assess the quality/bias in systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The wonders of randomisation—workshop for consumers 2013 Québec City
• The World Health Assembly 2023 resolution calls all stakeholders to prioritize health policy and systems research in rehabilitation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• The World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: reducing bias through trial registration and results disclosure 2006 Dublin
• The World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: a ‘one-stop shop’ for identifying clinical trials conducted worldwide? 2015 Vienna
• The X of UXG 2014 Hyderabad
• The young doctor’s opinion on Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) in Stellenbosch University’s medical curriculum 2013 Québec City
• Theories of teaching and learning, and teaching methods used in postgraduate education in the health sciences: A scoping review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Theory of change models: explaining the link between intervention strategies and outcomes in test-treatment studies 2018 Edinburgh
• Therapeutic effects and safety of adding Tongxinluo capsule vs. Western medical therapy alone on acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Therapeutic Guidelines Developing Countries Programme 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Therapeutic interventions for childhood cancer: An umbrella review of randomized evidence 2020 Abstracts
• Therapeutic interventions of low back pain: a mega-analysis 1995 Oslo
• Therapeutic Objectives: Still an unknown concept in France 2000 Cape Town
• Therapeutics for COVID-19: World Health Organization guidelines as a model for partnered living evidence and guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Therapy by physicians to stop tobacco smoking: assessment of the quality of trials 1994 Hamilton
• There is no such thing as a one-dimensional hierarchy of evidence: a critique and a perspective 2015 Vienna
• Thinking critically and making well-informed decisions about cancer misinformation and claims: an evidence-based programme Informed Health Choices-Cancer (IHC-C) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Thorough Debridement Reduces Infection Rates in Open Fracture Care Not Time to Index Surgery: Addressing the Global Commission of Surgery’s Call to Improve Care for the Bellwether Procedures A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies 2020 Abstracts
• Those responsible for approving research studies have poor knowledge of research study design: a brief knowledge quiz in a nationwide sample of IRB members 2014 Hyderabad
• Though not consistently superior, the absolute approach to framing the minimally important difference has advantages over the relative approach 2015 Vienna
• Threading the needle we found in the haystack: Identifying ongoing trials with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry 2011 Madrid
• Three living systematic reviews to inform living guideline recommendations in Germany: lessons learned 2023 London
• Three years’ of experience of implementing an evidence-based nursing training programme and its clinical outcomes in a medical centre in Taiwan 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Thumbs up, thumbs down: an analysis of online user ratings of summaries of systematic reviews 2009 Singapore
• Time interval for first publication and updates of systematic reviews under Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group 2019 Santiago
• Time interval for updating Cochrane systematic reviews about neglected tropical diseases 2019 Santiago
• Time lag bias in publishing results of clinical trials: a systematic review 2000 Cape Town
• Time to inclusion in systematic reviews: roadblock on the translational pathway 2009 Singapore
• Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates 2016 Seoul
• Time to publication for results of clinical trials: The definitive systematic review 2023 London
• Time to publication of Cochrane reviews: a retrospective cohort study 2008 Freiburg
• Time trends in summary estimates from meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies 2015 Vienna
• Time-dependent risk of fracture in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving anti-diabetic drug: A one-stage network meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Timing of prophylactic antibiotics during cesarean: a meta-analysis up to 2012 2012 Auckland
• TITLE 2000 Cape Town
• Title and abstract screening assessment in primary studies: based on Korean clinical trials 2015 Vienna
• Title Proposal Forms: How we are and how we should be 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Title undeclared 1997 Amsterdam
• Title-abstract versus title-only citation screening strategies for systematic reviewsand meta-analyses 2011 Madrid
• Title: Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) development in Taiwan using the AGREE II instrument. 2020 Abstracts
• Title: Effective Knowledge Translation: Lessons from a Three-Day Interactive Cochrane Standard Author Training Webinar 2023 London
• To annotate or re-annotate- what is the question? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• To assess the impact of contraceptive use and menstrual health among women of reproductive age- A systematic review with WHO 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• To assess the impact of contraceptive use and mental health among women of reproductive age- Systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• To blog or not to blog? Using blogs as a tool to provide consumer friendly evidence-based information on optimal aging 2020 Abstracts
• To disseminate is to ‘spread information widely’ – but how well do we do this? Dissemination of three linked Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
• To filter or not to filter? A study examining the use of diagnostic test accuracy search filters on a Cochrane DTA review 2010 Keystone
• To Identify Chinese Trial Reports of Studies: Hand Searching Compare with Electronic Searching 2002 Stavanger
• To improve the efficiency of database searches for the identification of reports of RCTs used in NICE guidelines 2013 Québec City
• To include, or not to include non-randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: a novel approach to a controversial question 2006 Dublin
• To screen or not to screen: the online opinion on prostate cancer screening 2004 Ottawa
• To share or not to share data: how valid are copious randomized controlled trials? 2020 Abstracts
• To sum or not to sum: assessing the methodological quality of primary studies in public health 2004 Ottawa
• To treat, NOT to trick: open-label placebo (OLP) and its applications in randomized controlled trials 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• To what extent are conference abstracts reporting randomised controlled trials of skin diseases published subsequently? 2005 Melbourne
• To what extent do Cochrane authors in sub-Saharan Africa conduct and publish non-Cochrane Reviews? 2019 Santiago
• To what extent do trials stopped early for benefit overesti­mate treatment effects? 2009 Singapore
• To what extent is the clinical context considered in diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews?: A methodological review 2011 Madrid
• Too many reviews to update, not enough time or resources! A workshop on prioritising and tools to update reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Too much data from too many sources: what is the best estimate of the treatment effect? 2016 Seoul
• Tool of transferability: application on studies of cost-effectiveness 2014 Hyderabad
• Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings table 2023 London
• Toolbox for effective evidence dissemination: a hands-on workshop 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Tools and methods for assessing the transferability of health technology assessment results across jurisdictions: a systematic review 2023 London
• Tools and resources for a rapid-response service to meet policy makers' urgent needs for evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Tools and resources for reviews of complex interventions: a workshop by the Consumers and Communication Review Group 2008 Freiburg
• Tools for sharing evidence for effectiveness from a systematic review of complex interventions to improve food security: Which do policy makers prefer? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Tools to assess trustworthiness of evidence-based, point-of-care resources for healthcare professionals: a systematic review 2019 Santiago
• Tools to evaluate the methodological quality of physical therapy trials. What items should we use from these tools? A factor analysis 2013 Québec City
• Tools to support capacity development for evidence-informed public health 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data identified in evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Topical Steroid Withdrawal Syndrome: An Evidence Gap Map on the range of evidence in research literature and social media platforms 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Topics and issues reported as 'other bias' in randomised clinical trials included in systematic reviews by Cochrane authors during 2017 2018 Edinburgh
• Totality of evidence: using indirect evidence to bridge the gaps 2004 Ottawa
• Towards a better understanding of what the 'level of evidence' is and how this can be evaluated 1996 Adelaide
• Towards Achieving the UNAIDS FIRST 90 target: Repeat HIV testing amongst PLHIVs in Nigeria - A Myth or Reality? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Towards an optimal use of the Cochrane Systematic Review to support decision making in a hospital setting 2013 Québec City
• Towards evidence summit in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in Indonesia 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Towards informed decisions in trusted evidence in Latin America: quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews about vaccines 2019 Santiago
• Towards modernizing the systematic review pipeline: efficient updating via data mining 2012 Auckland
• Towards More Scientific Meta-Analyses 2023 London
• Towards rapid learning health systems: supporting the Central Asian and European countries in using research evidence for policy-making 2020 Abstracts
• Towards universal access to reliable healthcare information: a global consultation for the World Health Organization 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Toxicity spectrum of immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A safety analysis from clinical trials and a pharmacovigilance system 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
• Trading certainty for speed: how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid review? An international survey 2016 Seoul
• Traditional Chinese interventions for stable angina 2004 Ottawa
• Traditional-intensive versus technology-enhanced approach for search and screening in systematic reviews (TITE project) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
• Traffic engineering and educational interventions to reduce pedestrian injuries: Identifying controlled studies 1999 Rome
• Train the trainer 2006 Dublin
• Train the trainer: Cochrane Library 2016 Seoul
• Train the Trainer: what training do the trainers need to improve? 2015 Vienna