• Empowering engagement: integrating patients and the public in guideline and health policy development
• Empowering Evidence-Based Practice: Navigating Systematic Reviews with AMSTAR Tools
  
• Empowering Optometrists: The Cochrane Eyes and Vision|American Academy Optometry Educational Program for Evidence-based Vision Care
  
• Empowering, sharing, learning, shaping: using Journal Club to increase consumer engagement in research
• Empty review reporting practices and policies: a survey of Cochrane Review Group editors and other key systematic review producers
• Empty reviews in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - how long do they stay empty?
• Enablers and barriers to interprofessional education and collaborative practice in rural healthcare settings: a mixed methods systematic review
  
• Enabling engagement: the UK Cochrane Centre’s experience of using social media for communication about Cochrane Reviews and more!
• Enabling informed treatment choices: development of an evidence portal for children and young people's mental health in Norway
• Enabling physicians to develop high quality systematic reviews
• Encouraging and supporting Australian policy makers to use Cochrane reviews - further reporting of a three year initiative
• Encouraging and supporting Australian policy makers to use Cochrane reviews: what have we learnt so far?
• Encouraging the use of EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines in Brazil
• Encouraging Words as a Tool for Optimizing Large Language Models in Healthcare: A Study on Clinical Guidelines
  
• Encyclopaedia of clinical guidelines in South Africa – A mapping project
• End-stage health service in China: current situation, problems and strategies
• Endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the relationship between funding sources and trial outcome
• Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: A systematic review
• Endorsement of Animal Research: Incorporation of in Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) Guidelines/Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) by Chinese journals: a survey of journals’ instructions for authors and editors
• Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal "instructions to authors"
• Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by journals of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM): a survey of journal editorial office and journal ‘Instructions to Authors’
• Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement in Chinese medical journals: a survey of Instruction to Authors
• Endorsement of the ICMJE’s clinical trial registration policy by biomedical journals: A survey of instructions for authors
• Endorsement of the PRISMA statement and the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study
• Endorsement of the STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) Statement by biomedical journals: survey of instructions
• Endoscopic and open release similarly safe for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis
• Endoscopic vs. conventional cholecystectomy: Influence of Study design on the validity of study results
• Endpoints of meta-analyses and primary endpoints of included studies: impact of non-concordance
• Energized devices in thyroideal surgery: an example of a standardized data extraction sheet for surgical system­atic reviews
• Engagement in the Clinical Pratice Guidelines development process: from evidence to implementation.
• Engagement, dissemination and dialogue using social media: considerations for health researchers
• Engagement, dissemination and dialogue: considerations for health researchers using social media for knowledge translation
• Engaging at events through social media
• Engaging Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and stakeholders in evidence synthesis
• Engaging Citizen Partners within a Rapid Review Process
• Engaging communities for health: iterative stakeholder involvement for theory development and testing using framework synthesis
• Engaging consumers and other stakeholders in a Cochrane Review: a mixed-methods evaluation
• Engaging consumers earlier in the Cochrane continuum beginning at priority setting: a project of the US Satellite of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group
• Engaging decision makers and researchers to identify priorities in health systems evidence synthesis for low-income countries: lessons learned from Uganda
• Engaging decision makers in using review evidence
• Engaging health promotion and public health practitioners and policy makers through summary tables of the findings of Cochrane reviews
• Engaging healthcare professionals in using Cochrane Reviews within the clinical decision-making pathway: how you can support the Cochrane Clinical Answers initiative
• Engaging nurses in the work of the Cochrane Collaboration: a field’s account
• Engaging patient partners in systematic reviews: the example of prevalence of persistent postsurgical pain after breast cancer surgery
• Engaging patients as advisors in systematic reviews: co-building the science to enhance impact and meaning for patients
• Engaging patients in priority setting: a British case study
• Engaging policy-makers, health system managers and policy analysts in the conduct of knowledge synthesis
• Engaging racially and ethnically diverse stakeholders in evidence syntheses: A review of reviews and guidance documents
• Engaging Small Businesses in the Practice of Health Promotion through Workplace Wellness Programs
• Engaging stake holders to better utilize evidence-based approach in policy making
• Engaging stakeholders in the development of a Theory of Change to support a systematic review aimed at WASH (water, sanitation, hygiene) policy makers
• Engaging stakeholders to identify evidence synthesis priorities for National Health Insurance Schemes: lessons learned from Uganda
• Engaging stakeholders to improve the understanding and use of Cochrane reviews
• Engaging the national mandate to promote evidence informed policy: using Cochrane methods and systematic reviews to move from idea to implementation
• Engaging volunteer translators: the Malaysian experience
• Engaging with parents to develop innovative knowledge translation tools that merge research and story
• Engaging with the next generation of ‘Cochranites’ through an international web-based community
• Engaging with the public to co-produce a framework for involving the public when developing national clinical guidelines or audit
• Engaging with younger generations through Students 4 Best Evidence: the follow-up
• Enhanced interrogation techniques—making Archie cough up the answers you need (restricted)
• Enhancing capacity for network meta-analysis in Sub-Saharan Africa
• Enhancing Coverage Decisions for High-Cost Anti-Cancer Medications: Integrating the ESMO - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale with the GRADE approach
  
• Enhancing decision-making: GRADE guidance development for mixed-methods systematic reviews
  
• Enhancing dissemination of Cochrane evidence via German translations of physiotherapy-related Cochrane Plain Language Summaries - a collaborative project
• Enhancing Dissemination of Mental Health Trial Evidence - The EU-PSI Project
• Enhancing evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and skills of medical student interns at Stellenbosch University’s Rural Clinical School in Worcester
• Enhancing Evidence-Based Pediatric Medicine: A Comprehensive Quality Assessment of Pediatric Cohort Studies
• Enhancing guidelines implementation: the example of ECIBC and its European Guidelines for breast-cancer screening and diagnosis.
• Enhancing Health and Social ScienceInformation on Wikipedia: A Collaborative Approach
  
• Enhancing health care through partnership: a framework for collaboration with academic societies for national-level clinical practice guidelines in Korea
• Enhancing knowledge translation through partnerships: an initiative to improve practice regarding nasogastric tube placement verification
• Enhancing layperson information: the added value of patient and public feedback
• Enhancing literature surveillance for evidence summaries in a "living evidence" framework
  
• Enhancing obstetric emergency care with AI-integrated clinical guidelines
  
• Enhancing partnerships and collaboration in times of change
• Enhancing Patient Safety Through Dissemination of Adverse Event Data Associated with Herbal Medicine: Insights from Korea Adverse Event Reporting System
  
• Enhancing Patient-Centeredness in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review of Methods for Integrating Values and Preferences
  
• Enhancing public health recommendations on hypertension through the utilization of umbrella review in the context of ultra-processed foods
  
• Enhancing public understanding of GRADE's certainty of evidence: the InfoGrade project
  
• Enhancing risk of bias assessments for individual participant data meta-analyses: preliminary guidance from 2 case studies
• Enhancing search strategy development using word clouds
• Enhancing small-scale implementation projects: the Implementation Support Program (ISP) by ebpracticenet
• Enhancing specialist and patient engagement in clinical practice guideline formulation through instructional materials
• Enhancing state policymakers’ ability to use research evidence
• Enhancing Systematic Review Efficiency: A Feasibility Study of Large Language Models in Title and Abstract Screening
• Enhancing Systematic Reviews with Large Language Models: Data Extraction of Randomized Controlled Trials
• Enhancing the acceptance and implementation of GRADE summary of findings tables for evidence about diagnostic tests
• Enhancing the acceptance and implementation of summary of findings tables in Cochrane Reviews: two non-inferiority randomized controlled trials
• Enhancing the acceptance and implementation of summary of findings tables in Cochrane Reviews: user testing study
• Enhancing the efficiency of the systematic review process for evidence-based medicine
• Enhancing the efficiency of the systematic review process for evidence-based medicine
• Enhancing the Quality of Social Science Practice Guidelines: Lessons from Clinical Practice Guidelines
• Enhancing the use of Systematic Reviews for Failure Analysis and Risk Assessment
  
• Enhancing the Value of 'Indecisive' cochrane reviews: The implied value approach
• Enhancing timely evidence synthesis: updated Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for health care decision-making
• Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
• Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: the ENTREQ statement—discussion and debate
• Enhancing uptake of systematic reviews: what is the best format for health care managers and policy makers?
• Ensuring Cochrane Reviews drive improvement in the design and delivery of health services
• Ensuring methodological quality of evidence for acupuncture
• Ensuring people with color vision deficiency access to figures
  
• Ensuring policy-relevant reviews: building capacity amongst review authors and policy makers
• Ensuring relevance and building enthusiasm for Cochrane reviews: determining appropriate methods for identifying priority topics for future Cochrane reviews
• Ensuring that patient-centered outcomes are included in research
• Ensuring that patient-centered outcomes are included in research
• Ensuring that systematic review research questions incorporate patient-centered outcomes
• Ensuring the quality Of consumer synopses Of Cochrane reviews
• Entity website builder: Making the most of your entity’s online presence
• Entity websites: a hands-on workshop to lighten your site maintenance work
• Entity websites: a training workshop for webmasters
• Environmental scanning to assess climate change readiness across Canadian health systems
• EPIDAS: a randomised controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy of the transmission of therapeutic information
• Epidemic and reporting characteristics of diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews in China
• Epidemic characteristics and quality of meta-analysis or systematic reviews in screening tests
• Epidemic characteristics of rapid reviews
• Epidemic characteristics of realist review
• Epidemiological and reporting characteristics of systematic review updates
• Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: cross-sectional study
• Epidemiological status of migrant women with cervical cancer at San Borja Arriaran Hospital, Santiago, Chile
• Epidemiology and publication history of randomized controlled trials that were discontinued
• Epidemiology and publication of discontinued randomized trials—the DISCO study
• Epidemiology and quality of reporting of conference abstracts related to randomized controlled trials in renal transplantation
• Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic review protocols
• Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews: 2014 update
• Epidemiology and study characteristics associated with reporting of subgroup analyses
• Epidemiology characteristics, methodological assessment and reporting of statistical analysis of network meta-analyses in the field of cancer
• Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals
• Epidemiology of the type of intention-to-treat reporting in meta-analyses
• Epidemiology, Methods and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Interventions to Change Provider Behaviour
• Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of randomized controlled trials on traditional Chinese medicine for gastric cancer published in Chinese journals
• Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals
• Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of CT orMRI diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals
• Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews on TCM published in China journals
• Epidemiology, reporting and biases of non-randomized studies of pharmacologic treatment
  
• Epidemiology, reporting characteristics and PRISMA-NMA adherence of systematic reviews with network meta-analysis: a meta-research study
• Epidemiology, reporting characteristics and PRISMA-NMA adherence of systematic reviews with network meta-analysis: a meta-research study
• EPIMETA: software for meta analyses of epidemiologic studies
• Epistemonikos Database of Randomized Trials: methods and preliminary results of a comprehensive, living database of trials
• Epistemonikos is building a ‘one-stop shop’ of synthesized nutrition evidence and LOVES to enable rapid-learning and decision-making to reduce malnutrition
• Epistemonikos is leading a multi-country, multi-disciplinary collaboration to build a multi-lingual ‘one-stop shop’ of synthesized nutrition evidence
• Epistemonikos: a comprehensive, systematic, collaborative and multilingual database for evidence-based health care
• Epistemonikos: a comprehensive, systematic, collaborative and multilingual database for evidence-based health care
• Epistemonikos: a comprehensive, systematic, collaborative and multilingual database for evidence-based health care
• EPOC activities and Australian health policy
• EPPI-Reviewer 4 practical: advanced session
• EPPI-Reviewer: a flexible platform for systematic reviews and evidence and gap maps
  
• EPPI-Reviewer: an online tool for conducting complex reviews
• EPPI-Reviewer: review-production software that adapts to your needs
• EPPI-Reviewer: Review-production software that adapts to your own needs
• EPPI-Reviewer: review-production software that adapts to your own needs
• Equalization of basic public health services policy in China and its impacts on inequalities in services coverage
• EQUATOR Network workshop. Reporting guidelines: An effective tool to improve reporting of research studies and other reports
• Equity and transparency in the Cochrane US Mentoring Program selection process: ensuring equitable access to mentorship opportunities.
• Equity consideration during guideline development: a methodological review
• Equity Considerations in COVID-19 Vaccination Studies of Individuals With Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
• Equity considerations in protocols for Cochrane reviews
• Equity considerations in the conduct of evidence syntheses in partnership with patients and other stakeholders
• Equity in Health Research Mentorship Programs: A Scoping Review
• Equity in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements
• Equity of Access? Cochrane Library Usage Before, During and After the Pandemic
  
• Equity reviews: challenges, opportunities and next steps
• eRegistries: Dissemination of healthcare guidelines to frontline providers
• EROS dialogues with RevMan: data extraction, quality assessment and more ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• EROS: web-based software for the initial phases of a systematic review
• Error identification in search strategies of new Cochrane Reviews published in 2015
• Essential core competencies for health policy doctoral graduates
• Essential items in reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: 2015 update of the STARD Statement
• Essential reporting items for meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes – Introduction and development
  
• Establishing a Cochrane roadmap to data models for asking relevant clinical questions and finding the best answers individually for each patient
• Establishing a database of RCT, CCT and diagnostic tests in China
• Establishing a dedicated respository for Cochrane Colloquium proceedings and presentation materials
• Establishing a Glocalization Methodology for Developing and Updating Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Taiwan experience.
• Establishing a special mechanism which aims to promote the whole level of study quality of clinical medicine in China
• Establishing an evidence-based nursing guideline of hepatic encephalopathy
• Establishing an In-house Evidence Review Team to Work in Parallel with Guideline Development
• Establishing and prioritising a local health research agenda with end users
• Establishing Chinese Clearinghouse for Evidence-Based Practice and Policy
• Establishing database of RCT reports published in Chinese with English citation and PICO to support Cochrane reviewers within the Collaboration
• Establishing prioritization criteria for rare disease clinical practice guideline development in the European Reference Network context: a Delphi study
• Establishing Rapid Review Response System between policy makers and researchers to uptake research evidence in Ethiopia
  
• Establishing the database of systematic review glossary
• Establishing the impact of WHO’s normative and standard-setting functions: what is the future role of key evidence ecosystem players?
• Establishing the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: Methodological issues in putting it all together
• Establishing thresholds for important benefits in screening guidelines
• Establishment and application of an evidence-based pediatric guideline decision assistance database: the EACH platform
  
• Establishment and testify the self-report adverse events system of patients with cancer during chemotherapy
• Establishments of the Cochrane India Network: Sharing initial experiences
• Estimating a test’s accuracy using tailored meta-analysis—the potential of setting-specific data in aiding study selection
• Estimating costs of lost productivity – examples of methodological shortcomings from an evaluation related to long-term sickness absence
• Estimating diagnostic accuracy when primary studies selectively report cut-offs: individual participant data meta-analysis versus three methods for analyzing published data
• Estimating hazard ratios using Parmar's methods
• Estimating risk differences and NNTs with adjustment for balanced covariates
• Estimating risk differences in patient-important events when studies have focused on surrogate outcomes: Application to systematic reviews and practice guidelines
• Estimating sample size in randomised controlled trials where patients are clustered
• Estimating the occurrence of non-standardised adverse outcomes: the case of lipodystrophy
• Estimating the parameters to a bivariate random-effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis using standard approaches
• Estimating the sample size of a clinical trial to make a meta-analysis conclusive. An example on meta-analysis of inhaled isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals
• Estimating treatment effects on patient-important outcomes from surrogate markers: the case of venous thrombosis
• Estrogens and osteoporosis: investigators concerned with technology rather than clinical science
• Estrogens and osteoporosis: quality of observational studies