Index

Train the trainers of evidence-based healthcare workshops 2008 Freiburg
Train the trainers: Medical Library Literacy for Health Professionals in Ethiopia 2015 Vienna
Train the trainers: techniques for training systematic reviewers 2005 Melbourne
Training and education in critical appraisal leads to increase in usage and contribution to The Cochrane Library in India 2009 Singapore
Training and support; one region's views and needs 1997 Amsterdam
Training and supporting of Cochrane authors – Polish experience 2016 Seoul
Training Cochrane Systematic Reviews: challenges and benefits of online training 2013 Québec City
Training community research partners in evidence synthesis methods: a pilot study 2018 Edinburgh
Training for awareness on using Cochrane Library in Ministry of Health, Malaysia 2023 London
Training for Managing editors – Part 1 (restricted) 2013 Québec City
Training for patients and citizens representatives: evaluating the PartecipaSalute courses 2010 Keystone
Training handsearchers: going from a paper to a web-based course 2005 Melbourne
Training new commissioners from the social/welfare area 2018 Edinburgh
Training on critical appraisal and scientific production for health residents and preceptors in Brazil 2023 London
Training practitioners in the EBP process: an effective continuing education training model 2010 Keystone
Training reviewers in China 2004 Ottawa
Training trainers: an approach to standardizing and disseminating risk of bias education 2014 Hyderabad
Training U.K. Librarians to Use the Cochrane Library: Has it Impacted on Usage of the Cochrane Library? 1999 Rome
Training workshops in Cochrane Systematic Reviews at Cochrane Russia 2019 Santiago
Training your robot: best practices for leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in reference screening 2018 Edinburgh
Transdisciplinary Approaches for Setting Research Priorities on Climate Change and Health: Engaging Decision Makers, Researchers, and Communities 2023 London
TRANSFER Approach: including consumers in assessing transferability of review findings 2018 Edinburgh
Transferability of evidence based information driven by Clinical Evidence through an Italian continuing education programme on the web: a qualitative study 2005 Melbourne
Transferring evidence into practice: A Nursing Minimum Data Set within the nutritional area in primary healthcare 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Transferring knowledge: equity for health professionals in Ethiopia 2013 Québec City
Transferring Public Health Nursing research to health system planning: assessing the relevance and accessibility of systematic reviews 1997 Amsterdam
Transfers between Cochrane review Groups to sharpen profile and facilitate the work of Cochrane authors 2023 London
Transformation of meaning perspectives in clients with rheumatoid arthritis 2004 Ottawa
Transformation of summary statistics from a skewed distribution into summary statistics on the log scale 2005 Melbourne
Transforming from information overload to information excitement using the Pearl Harvesting Information Retrieval Framework 2015 Vienna
Transforming the health care system through the National Guideline Development and Adaptation Program in Egypt 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Transfusion Evidence Round-ups’: an ISBT/SRI collaboration with a goal to share knowledge to improve transfusion practice worldwide. 2023 London
Transitional Care to prevent readmission of patients with Chronic Heart Failure through a multidisciplinary approach: a best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Transitioning to living systematic reviews: Lessons learned from a large scale review on diabetes quality improvement interventions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Transitioning to value-based care through system-level, evidence-based guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
Transitions: Cochrane PDUC to Cochrane Urology and expanding to 12 TSCs 2015 Vienna
Translating basic science research to public health impact: challenges of water and wastewater-based surveillance evidence informing cholera outbreak management 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Translating Cochrane abstracts and plain language summaries from traditional to simplified Chinese: feasibility assessment and user survey 2013 Québec City
Translating Cochrane abstracts into Portuguese for use in Africa: a successful partnership between Cochrane Africa and Cochrane Brazil 2019 Santiago
Translating Cochrane evidence into practice in the Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka 2006 Dublin
Translating Cochrane Reviews to lay people through the web: the IN-DEEP project 2013 Québec City
Translating critical appraisal of a systematic review to meaningful peer review 2012 Auckland
Translating critical appraisal of a systematic review to meaningful peer review 2014 Hyderabad
Translating critical appraisal of a systematic review to meaningful peer review 2013 Québec City
Translating evidence into a user-centred interface: the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) web hub 2018 Edinburgh
Translating evidence into patient information: challenges and possible solutions when extracting and presenting the results of Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
Translating evidence into practical tools to teach first aid to children in sub-Saharan Africa 2018 Edinburgh
Translating filters between different interfaces: not as easy as you might think 2018 Edinburgh
Translating global research evidence to local decisions: learning to use the EtD framework and the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Translating knowledge from systematic reviews: evaluation of infographics and critical appraisal formats 2014 Hyderabad
Translating one million words into two languages: process approach and lessons learnt from the translation of a comprehensive international guideline database 2013 Québec City
Translating research into practice: current challenges in pediatric sleep medicine 2014 Hyderabad
Translating the abstracts in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) into Chinese 2009 Singapore
Translating the Cochrane Library into Spanish 1998 Baltimore
Translation and validation of the 'Risk of bias' (RoB) tool to Brazilian Portuguese 2014 Hyderabad
Translation and validation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias into German 2013 Québec City
Translation initiative of the Brazilian Cochrane Centre: experience of the first eight months 2014 Hyderabad
Translation of Cochrane summaries: a realistic and timely goal for the collaboration? 2013 Québec City
Translation of plain language summaries, does it help in better understanding? 2015 Vienna
Translation of research priorities into research topics - A 3-step approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Translation of the ADAPTE process: an important step to improve evidence communication in Brazil 2015 Vienna
Transparency and completeness of reporting in study registries - a comparative study 2018 Edinburgh
Transparency enhancement for reports of randomized controlled trials in behavioral medicine 2006 Dublin
Transparency of Chinese trials: The results are fully published after registered in WHO primary registries? 2010 Keystone
Transparency of clinical trial in China: strategy and foresight 2008 Freiburg
Transparency of COVID-19-related research: A meta-research study 2023 London
Transparency of the guideline development process by using a new guideline structure 2000 Cape Town
Transparent and traceable data science-based real-world evidence (DS-RWE) producing: framework and practice in traditional Chinese medicine 2023 London
Transparent assessment of resource use and costs of randomised clinical trials: a case series 2018 Edinburgh
Transparent reporting of a multi-variable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis: the TRIPOD statement 2014 Hyderabad
Transparent two stage approach to identification and selection of qualitative literature for meta ethnographic synthesis 2010 Keystone
Transparent, explicit, intuitive: Bayesian updating of Cochrane reviews 2000 Cape Town
Travelling to the tropics? How to enrich a systematic review with good observational evidence about adverse effects 1999 Rome
Treatment adequacy of Chinese medicine in Cochrane systematic reviews: an investigation 2010 Keystone
Treatment benefit cannot be excluded on the basis of mean difference alone 2015 Vienna
Treatment decision by patient participation: a preliminary study based on the workpiece of shared decision making in medicine 2018 Edinburgh
Treatment effect estimates for nontruncated trials need adjustment when conducting sensitivity analyses to assess risk of bias in early-stopped trials 2020 Abstracts
Treatment effect sizes vary in randomized trials depending on type of outcome measure 2019 Santiago
Treatment effects from the patient perspective: understanding the alternatives to intention-to-treat analyses 2013 Québec City
Treatment guidelines in specialist mental healthcare: how important are they and how to translate them into practice? 2015 Vienna
Treatment information-seeking by people with multiple sclerosis in the internet age: Stage 1 findings of the IN-DEEP project 2011 Madrid
Treatment of acute migraine attacks in children with analgesics on the World Health Organization Essential Medicines List: A systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Treatment of chronic cerebrovascular disorders with the metabolic activators compared to placebo: a cumulative meta-analysis 1995 Oslo
Treatment of Hashimoto's thyroiditis with Xiao-yao San: A meta-analysis and systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Treatment of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer 2004 Ottawa
Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews of imaging studies 2016 Seoul
Treatment of quasi-randomised trials in Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
Treatment related harms: what was planned and what was reported? An analysis of Southwest Oncology Group phase III trials 2009 Singapore
Treatment uncertainties in blood donation and blood transfusion: involvement of patients and donors as well as clinicians 2018 Edinburgh
Treatments for Bullous Pemphigoid - A systematic review 2000 Cape Town
Treatments for plantar heel pain 1997 Amsterdam
Trends analysis of cancer topic of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a bibliometric analysis 2019 Santiago
Trends and hotspots of global ultra-processed food research (2010-2023): A scientometric study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Trends and quality of Japanese clinical practice guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Trends in item scores of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument in Japan 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Trends in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain: comparing drug trials with non-drug trials 2005 Melbourne
Trends in randomized controlled trials of malaria treatment and prophylaxis in Africa 2008 Freiburg
Trends in reported allocation concealment in RCTs included in systematic reviews 2004 Ottawa
Trends in the consumption of medicines for the treatment of bipolar disorder in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Trends in use and costs of lumbar and full spine radiography by chiropractors in Ontario: a review of Ontario Health Insurance Plan and Workplace Safety and Insurance Board data from 1994 to 2001 2004 Ottawa
Trends over time in the size and quality of randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic low-back pain 2011 Madrid
TRiads-P: A translational research programme to promote evidence-based practice in the community pharmacy setting 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Trial Characteristics and Treatment Effect Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Meta-Epidemiological Study 2023 London
Trial data available in FDA and EMA reports: a cross-sectional study 2014 Hyderabad
Trial investigators as authors of Cochrane reviews: do we manage conflicts of interests adequately? 2014 Hyderabad
Trial publication after registration in Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI): a cross-sectional analysis of randomized controlled trials 2018 Edinburgh
Trial Registers: What Do Users Really Really Want? 1999 Rome
Trial registration can be a useful source of information for quality assessment: a study of trials records retrieved from the WHO search portal 2009 Singapore
Trial results in clinical trial registries – towards more transparency in clinical research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Trial sequential analyses of 145 Cochrane Neonatal Group meta-analyses considering adequacy of allocation concealment and heterogeneity 2006 Dublin
Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses from a Cochrane review of targeting intensive versus conventional glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes 2011 Madrid
Trial sequential analyses of six Cochrane neonatal group meta-analyses considering adequacy of allocation concealment 2005 Melbourne
Trial sequential analyses of six meta-analyses considering heterogeneity and trial weight 2005 Melbourne
Trial Sequential Analysis controls random error risks in systematic review meta-analyses 2015 Vienna
Trial sequential analysis for cumulative evidence: how much was believable? 2012 Auckland
Trial sequential analysis in meta-analyses: could all evidence be firm? 2012 Auckland
Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis with R 2019 Santiago
Trial summary report software and database specifications and preliminary results 1994 Hamilton
Trial tracking in guidelines surveillance: Case studies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Trials at the Cochrane/Campbell interface 2000 Cape Town
Trials Of heart diseases in developing countries 2000 Cape Town
Trials of tuberculosis-prevention interventions in Africa: A descriptive cross-sectional study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Trials reported as abstracts and full publications: how do they compare? 2004 Ottawa
Trials reported in abstracts: the need for a mini-CONSORT 2005 Melbourne
Trials Search Co-ordinators and the IMS 2012 Auckland
Trials Search Co-ordinators' discussion forum (advanced) 2006 Dublin
Trials we cannot trust: investigating their impact on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines in spinal pain 2023 London
TRIPOD-SRMA: Reporting guideline for transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prediction model studies 2023 London
True methodological quality of trials are not reflected in their reporting 2011 Madrid
Trust but Verify- The Pro and Cons of Transparency in Point-of-Care Evidence Summaries 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Trusting what you see: the importance of images shared with evidence for health decision-making and how to get it right 2023 London
Trusts, foundations, and the EU: strategies for accessing new funding sources 2015 Vienna
Trustworthy clinical practice guidelines: a national project in the Czech Republic 2019 Santiago
Trustworthy digital evidence ecosystem to improve diagnosis and treatment of patients 2015 Vienna
Trustworthy stopping criteria for reliable work savings from machine learning prioritised screening 2023 London
Trying to introduce systematic comparisons between randomized and non-randomized studies into the surgery field: a case report 2013 Québec City
Tuberculosis clinical trial activity on the African continent: an analysis of tuberculosis trials registered on the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry and WHO-ICTRP 2015 Vienna
Tunisian Emergency referential : from redaction to implementation 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Turbidimetric d-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis 2004 Ottawa
Turning a scientific procedure into an online participative tool 2013 Québec City
Turning knowledge into action: Translating Cochrane reviews in the healthcare setting 2011 Madrid
Tutorship program to enhance quality and reporting of clinical practice guidelines: findings from Brazilian clinical guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Two examples of synergy between an Academic institution and policymakers in Argentina 2010 Keystone
Two reviews are better than one? Developing linkages between a Cochrane review and a review of mixed methods 2008 Freiburg
Two years down, one to go: an NIHR programme grant in numbers 2016 Seoul
Two years' experience for training appraisers of guidelines using an AGREE II scoring guide in Korea 2015 Vienna
Two-year follow up in a breast-screening decision aid RCT: Retention of overdetection knowledge and other decision-making effects 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Type 1 diabetes in children - touching the void in research evidence 2004 Ottawa
Type-1-diabetes: the problems associated with comparing Integrated Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy systems for managing blood glucose levels with multiple daily injections 2015 Vienna
Types of selective inclusion and reporting bias in randomised trials and systematic reviews of randomised trials 2012 Auckland
Typhoon Haiyan: the impact of free access 2014 Hyderabad
UK Co-ordinating Editor Quality Control Pilot Scheme (aka The QUACk Scheme) 2006 Dublin
UK filter project: methodological approach to reduce information overload by developing validated UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase 2015 Vienna
UK prioritisation methods for Cochrane Reviews 2011 Madrid
Ultra-rapid HTAs: a survey of usefulness and influence in decision making 2016 Seoul
Ultra-rapid synthesis of secondary sources for hospital COVID-19 guidance 2020 Abstracts
Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: evaluating efficacy, setting priorities for research and for implementing the evidence 1997 Amsterdam
Umbrella reviews: development and reporting of an approach to summarize systematic reviews 2016 Seoul
Umbrella workshops 2006 Dublin
UN Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020-30: how can the evidence synthesis community contribute? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Uncertainty in baseline risk can reduce confidence in estimates of effect 2012 Auckland
Uncertainty in control group risk can, in systematic reviews, undermine confidence in estimates of effect 2011 Madrid
Uncertainty of heterogeneity in meta-analyses 2007 Sao Paulo
Uncommon language: The challenges of inconsistent terminology use for evidence synthesis 2011 Madrid
Under-reporting of outcomes is prevalent and inflates effect size estimates in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
Underestimation of depression screening-tool sensitivity when using lay-administered, fully structured diagnostic interviews as the reference standard 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Underreporting of conflicts of interest among authors of clinical drug trials: cross sectional study 2013 Québec City
Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study 2013 Québec City
Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the prison setting: a quasi-experimental study in four European countries 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding and strengthening knowledge translation platforms (KTPs): a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding barriers and approaches to communicating health economic evidence: systematic review and needs assessment 2012 Auckland
Understanding challenges of managing ischemic heart disease in primary care to inform the scoping of a national clinical guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding clinicians’ perceptions of, endorsements of, and intentions to use cancer practice guidelines 2008 Freiburg
Understanding complex issues of GP retention using a visual model to interface qualitative evidence synthesis, patient involvement and primary research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding context in evidence synthesis and guideline development – connecting global evidence and local needs 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding evidence: machine learning and artificial intelligence in the Human Behaviour-Change Project 2019 Santiago
Understanding how meta-analysts interpret meta-analyses 2011 Madrid
Understanding implementation research: Case study from the HIFA virtual discussion forum 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding patients, physicians and caregivers’s perspectives on Artificial Intelligence：A targeted review of qualitative studies 2020 Abstracts
Understanding reporting and publication patterns of systematic reviews of medical education 2014 Hyderabad
Understanding subjectivity in the meta-analytic process: Meta-analysts' variation in managing variability 2011 Madrid
Understanding the barriers and facilitators for developing and implementing evidence-based practice guidelines during a pandemic: Protocol for exploratory mixed-methods study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding the Contents and Gaps in Sexual and Reproductive Health Toolkits Designed for Adolescence and Young Adults: A Systematic Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding the determinants WHO guideline panels consider in making strong recommendations in the face of low or very low confidence (study quality) in effect estimates 2014 Hyderabad
Understanding the evidence-informed decision-making landscape in Africa: actors, engagement and skills 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding the health impacts of climate change: search filter development for exposure pathways 2023 London
Understanding the impact of outcome reporting bias in trials (the ORBIT study) 2008 Freiburg
Understanding the mechanisms of trial discontinuation due to poor recruitment: Interviews with stakeholders in clinical trials 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Understanding the process and impact of within-study selective reporting bias 2006 Dublin
Understanding the process and impact of within-study selective reporting bias for harm outcomes (ORBIT II—outcome reporting bias in trials) 2013 Québec City
Understanding the relationship between risks and odds ratios 2005 Melbourne
Understanding, appraising and reporting systematic reviews that use individual participant data 2013 Québec City
Undertaking a mixed methods Cochrane Review of school-based asthma interventions: logic, learning and results 2016 Seoul
Undertaking a systematic review addressing a question of prevalence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Undertaking overview of systematic reviews – methods, challenges and the way forward (as identified by a group of clinical academics and methodologists who recently figured it all out) 2023 London
UNED: a strategy to strengthen evidence-informed decision-making in Colombia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unfudging nudging: identifying evidence for poorly-specified interventions in public health 2012 Auckland
Unique methodological challenges to incorporating studies on food taxation into Cochrane Reviews: comparing Cochrane EPOC and Reeves et al 2017 study design classifications 2018 Edinburgh
Unique trial identification numbers are underreported in biomedical publications 2011 Madrid
Uniqueness of conducting systematic reviews and developing nutrition practice guidelines: Experiences and challenges from Academy’s EAL 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Unit of analysis errors in meta-analyses of exposure to plastic chemicals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Univariable meta-regression may be more conservative compared to chi-square in sub-group analyses 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Univariate and multivariate prognostic indexes to evaluate treatment efficacy in a systematic overview 1997 Amsterdam
University conflict of interest policies for health research and education: a scoping review 2020 Abstracts
Unknown knowns: use of Cochrane review results in designing new studies 2005 Melbourne
Unlocking Healthcare Insights: The Power of Best Practice Information Sheets (BPIS) in Disseminating Systematic Review Findings 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unlocking innovations for sharing and using Cochrane content with study centric data management and a focused review article 2023 London
Unlocking the DOOR to build transparent composite primary outcomes for chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unlocking the future MedTech innovation landscape: the application of evidence synthesis methods to improve outputs and reporting 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unlocking the key to empower citizens in digital health data governance: insights from an overview of reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unlocking the potential of artificial intelligence in the systematic review process: a special session with Cochrane's Methods Executive 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unlocking young minds: findings from a national survey on critical thinking on health in Polish primary schools (LIGHT) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unmet health care needs in Brazilian National Health System: mapping diseases without clinical protocols and therapeutic guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unmet needs of patients transitioning to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Qualitative findings for a resource development 2018 Edinburgh
Unnecessary pooling of heterogeneous data: Analysis of a sample of systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Unnecessary repetitions of pediatric clinical trials: cumulative meta-analyses 2015 Vienna
Unpackaging context dependence in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a methodological approach for managing double-layered complexity 2015 Vienna
Unplanned crossover in randomised controlled trials: Consequences for efficacy and safety outcomes 2011 Madrid
Unpublished data from United States Food and Drug Administration New Drug Application Reviews: How Do They Compare to Published Data when Assessing Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug (NSAID) Associated Dyspepsia? 1999 Rome
Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study 2016 Seoul
Unpublished trials in molluscum contagiosum: a case study in publication bias 2015 Vienna
Unraveling education needs for clinical practice guideline development: a survey in the Netherlands 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unravelling active ingredients of task-shifting interventions in low-resource settings for common mental disorders: developing a taxonomy of intervention components and ranking their efficacy. 2023 London
Unreported trial amnesty 1997 Amsterdam
Untangling the maze of the trial selection process 2007 Sao Paulo
Untapped potential for systematic review software & automation to reduce the 6 million hours spent on title/abstract screening annually 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Unveiling a Decade of Excellence in Evidence: 10 years of the first Academic League of Evidence-Based Medicine in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Update of Cochrane Systematic Review of audit and feedback demonstrates stability in findings. Will future trials be helpful? 2011 Madrid
Update of PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Update of the Cochrane Review of interventions for preventing obesity in children: priority setting 2014 Hyderabad
Update of the Cochrane systematic review of interventions for preventing obesity in children: a research program 2014 Hyderabad
Update of the Cochrane systematic review of interventions for preventing obesity in children: overview of systematic reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Update of the EPOC methodological search filter 2007 Sao Paulo
Update of the European guidelines on breast cancer screening and diagnosis: updated recommendations and new topics 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Update Process of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Palliative Care within the Spanish National Health System Guidelines Program 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updated Brazilian guidelines for health economic evaluation in public system 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updated Brazilian guidelines of GRADE system to evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updated critical appraisal tools for systematic reviews of textual evidence: narrative, expert opinion, and policy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating a Clinical Practice Guideline on Insomnia for Primary Care: evidence from Systematic Reviews and a Qualitative Study. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating a review of nicotine replacement therapy. What difference does it make? 2000 Cape Town
Updating a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: First Annual Update of Sexual Risk reduction Effects Following HIV Intervention 1999 Rome
Updating an evidence-based clinical guideline for providing care to cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in hospital in Taiwan 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating an Evidence-based Clinical Guideline for Providing Oral Care in Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Cancer Patients in a Hospital in Taiwan 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating blood pressure targets in Singapore – insights from developing an ACE Clinical Guidance for hypertension management 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating Clinical Practice Guidelines in a Field with Limited Evidence: American Society of Hematology Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism Treatment Guideline 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating Cochrane reviews: vigilance required? 2008 Freiburg
Updating DataBase: an open access living repository of methodological documents about updating systematic reviews and clinical guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating for quality: reflections on our editorial policy 2014 Hyderabad
Updating gap in Cochrane systematic reviews: an observational pilot study. Preliminary results 2020 Abstracts
Updating guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement 2020 Abstracts
Updating JBI guidance for conducting systematic reviews of etiology and risk 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating national guidelines with recommendations of duration of sickness absence and as a tool for assessing work ability 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating patient information: a literature review 2015 Vienna
Updating QUADAS: User experience informs the development of QUADAS-2 2011 Madrid
Updating recommendations in guidelines using new tools. Which approach is more efficient? 2020 Abstracts
Updating Searches for Evidence Synthesis: The good, the bad and the ugly 2023 London
Updating systematic reviews can improve the precision of outcomes: a comparative study 2020 Abstracts
Updating systematic reviews published in Chinese: a cross-sectional study 2015 Vienna
Updating systematic reviews with active learning 2016 Seoul
Updating systematic reviews: an international survey 2008 Freiburg
Updating the evidence for German geriatric medicine: an approach inspired by Cochrane Living Systematic Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
Updating the National Disease Management Guideline for Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain – a best-practice example 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Updating the web-based "Right Review" tool: an international Delphi process 2023 London
UpGlossary: Guidance on terminology and definitions for updating clinical guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Upgrading the quality of evidence from RCTs? Examples from published summary of findings tables 2013 Québec City
Uptake and Implementation of GRADE among guideline developers in the United States 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Uptake and influential factors of randomized trials in Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture 2019 Santiago
Uptake of Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections reviews in primary care guidelines 2011 Madrid
Uptake of core outcome sets (COSs) in China 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research – A systematic review 2010 Keystone
Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health policy briefs: an analysis of references 2015 Vienna
Ursodeoxycholic Acid for Primary Biliary Cirrhosis - a Systematic Review 1999 Rome
US Cochrane Network-Who are we? 2020 Abstracts
US Patent documents on the Internet: an unexplored source of unpublished clinical trials 1996 Adelaide
US-PCG consumer involvement and outreach efforts 2020 Abstracts
Usability of Cochrane-based evidence summaries in point-of-care guidelines 2013 Québec City
Usage and acceptance of adjusted indirect comparisons in IQWiG reports in the period 2011 to 2016 2018 Edinburgh
Usage of Cochrane reviews in The World Health Organization (WHO) Reproductive Health Library 2006 Dublin
Usage of evidence from Cochrane reviews in evidence synthesis to support judiciary decision-making in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: producing systematic reviews to support evidence-based federal nutrition guidance and programs in the USA 2018 Edinburgh
Use and acceptability of third-party network meta-analysis tools in conducting reviews among Cochrane authors 2023 London
Use and methodology of framework synthesis in mixed-methods literature reviews 2023 London
Use and process of adjudication committees in randomised controlled trials 2007 Sao Paulo
Use and quality of Cochrane Reviews used in knee and hip osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines 2013 Québec City
Use i-PARIHS framework to develop evidence implementation strategies for central venous catheter maintenance: a multisite quality improvement project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of a wiki-based educational resource as a knowledge translation intervention to improve research in child health 2012 Auckland
Use of an advisory group to ensure relevance: reflections on participation of stakeholders in a review of sexual health promotion for men who have sex with men (MSM) 2004 Ottawa
Use of an influence-interest grid for stakeholder analysis to develop a national engagement and implementation programme 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of Cochrane bladder cancer reviews: confirming the need for Wikiproject Medicine and assessing what is ‘UpToDate’ 2014 Hyderabad
Use of Cochrane Evidence in Mexican clinical practice guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of Cochrane Library in consensus conference on childhood asthma 1998 Baltimore
Use of Cochrane nutrition reviews in guidelines: appraising the 'payback' on investing in nutrition evidence synthesis 2018 Edinburgh
Use of Cochrane Reviews in developing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) in Malaysia 2015 Vienna
Use of Cochrane reviews in guidelines for general practitioners 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of Cochrane Reviews in nationally developed clinical practice guidelines in Latin America 2019 Santiago
Use of Cochrane Reviews in NICE Clinical Guidelines 2011 Madrid
Use of Cochrane reviews in the Canadian common drug review reports 2009 Singapore
Use of Cochrane Reviews to inform the health policy-making process in a rapid evidence synthesis program in Chile 2018 Edinburgh
Use of composite endpoints in cardiovascular trials 2007 Sao Paulo
Use of consumer and guideline user surveys in the development of a consensus-based guideline on sports preparticipation evaluations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of continuous outcome measures in systematic reviews 1996 Adelaide
Use of decision-making frameworks and models in health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of evidence and data in response to COVID-19 challenges; Countries experience in the Eastern Mediterranean Region 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of evidence from low- to middle-income countries in a national public health guidance programme 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of evidence grading systems in Health Technology Assessments (HTAs): a cross-sectional survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of evidence in economic decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997 2005 Melbourne
Use of Evidence to Decision frameworks in the European Breast Guidelines: increasing stakeholder involvement and transparency 2018 Edinburgh
Use of Evidence-based nursing (EBN) by nurses in Belgium 2005 Melbourne
Use of Field Topic Lists in Archie 2008 Freiburg
Use of filters in electronic searching for observational studies 2015 Vienna
Use of framework synthesis to prioritise systematic review topics among multiple stakeholders: a descriptive case study 2015 Vienna
Use of GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence from network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey 2020 Abstracts
Use of GRADE in Chinese clinical practice guidelines 2020 Abstracts
Use of GRADE in Dentistry Systematic Reviews: A Methodological Study 2023 London
Use of GRADE in the Non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy 2020 Abstracts
Use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to guide revision of CDC’s hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing recommendations for persons born during 1945 through 1965 in the United States 2012 Auckland
Use of Health Technology Assessment in Clinical Practice Guidelines: a Retrospective Analysis 2020 Abstracts
Use of i>clicker technology in workshops improves evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) knowledge 2016 Seoul
Use of IMMPACT domains in clinical trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a methodological survey 2018 Edinburgh
Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: A survey of Cochrane review authorsá views 2011 Madrid
Use of individual patient data vs. published reports in a meta-analysis: the case of ACE-inhibitors in myocardial infarction 1997 Amsterdam
Use of information from summary of findings tables in the clinical practice guidelines development: a pilot study in Colombia 2014 Hyderabad
Use of machine learning to conduct systematic reviews of patient values and preferences in the context of guideline development 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of machine-learning tools to support efficient study identification in Cochrane reviews: A case study and cost-effectiveness analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of mathematical modelling in WHO guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of medical terminologies to describe adverse event terms in ClinicalTrials.gov 2016 Seoul
Use of network meta-analyses in WHO guideline recommendations 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of network meta-analysis in guidelines: a retrospective analysis 2019 Santiago
Use of non-randomised evidence in Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group's reviews 1999 Rome
Use of observational studies in comparative effectiveness reviews 2007 Sao Paulo
Use of outcome data hierarchies to deal with multiplicity in trials: survey of systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
Use of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in drug subsidisation decisions 1996 Adelaide
Use of research evidence in newborn and child health policies and practices in Kenya 2015 Vienna
Use of Simulation Scenarios and Vote Cards in Teaching Critical Appraisal of Randomized Controlled Trials 2023 London
Use of study design search filters, search strategy quality and reviewers’ screening burden in prognosis, diagnosis and effectiveness systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use of systematic review evidence to inform local decision-making in the National Health Service: a case study of eating disorders 2010 Keystone
Use of systematic reviews and rapid evidence synthesis in setting up National Health Research Priorities in Malaysia 2020 Abstracts
Use of systematic reviews in a clinical practice guideline on colorectal cancer 2007 Sao Paulo
Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines developed by the Brazilian Medical Association 2008 Freiburg
Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of development of clinical practice guideline by a professional organization in Indonesia 2005 Melbourne
Use of systematic reviews when adapting guidelines 2016 Seoul
Use of the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies (CHARMS) for critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies on medical usage rates in mass gatherings 2019 Santiago
Use of the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool in systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine 2016 Seoul
Use of the Cochrane Library in Medical Libraries in the United Kingdom. 1999 Rome
Use of the Comments and Criticisms Facility: Pilot experience with new systematic reviews 1997 Amsterdam
Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews of animal studies 2016 Seoul
Use of the number needed to treat (NNT) in Cochrane reviews 2009 Singapore
Use of the USA food and drug administration web site for clinical trial information from approved therapies 2004 Ottawa
Use Of The World-Wide-Web To Identify Unpublished Evidence For Systematic Reviews - The Future Role Of The Internet To Improve Information Identification 1999 Rome
Use of tramadol in control of chronic cough: N-of-1 trial 2007 Sao Paulo
Use of WOMAC for the Assessment of Treatment Benefit for the Pain of Osteoarthritis of the Knee 2011 Madrid
Use R! An introduction to meta-analysis with R 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Use R! An Introduction to Meta-Analysis with R 2015 Vienna
Use R! Network meta-analysis with R 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Usefulness of Cochrane Systematic Reviews in health technology assessments in Argentina 2013 Québec City
Usefulness of the Cochrane Library to U.S. Primary Care Clinicians. 1999 Rome
User and producer-friendly formatting of Cochrane Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
User engagement in evidence synthesis: A comparative analysis of African labour, housing and conservation policies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
User involvement in the recommendation development process to improve guideline adherence 2019 Santiago
User preferences regarding online tools for systematic review and guideline production: Results from a G-I-N Tech Survey 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
User-friendly search strategies for geriatric evidence in Medline 2011 Madrid
User-involvement in a Cochrane systematic review update: using structured methods to enhance clinical relevance, usefulness and usability 2015 Vienna
Users' experiences with the interactive Evidence to Decision framework (iEtD): a qualitative analysis 2018 Edinburgh
Users’ experience of frameworks to support evidence-informed decision-making in public health is positive, but still limited 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Users’ guides to assessing multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis 2012 Auckland
Using 'Implications for practice’ from Cochrane reviews to promote worldwide improvements in healthcare 2011 Madrid
Using ‘chain of evidence’ synthesis for the use of intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset group B streptococcal disease 2018 Edinburgh
Using a bibliometric approach for a clinical question that generates a large volume of literature 2013 Québec City
Using a challenge in Cochrane Crowd to involve medical students in evidence production 2019 Santiago
Using a co-design approach to increase the awareness, use and engagement of a digital map of COVID-19 recommendations 2023 London
Using a collaborative online platform to identify systematic reviews in LILACS 2011 Madrid
Using a combined realist and socio-ecological approach to integrating quantitative and qualitative systematic review evidence in a health technology assessment setting 2013 Québec City
Using a Distribution-Based Approach and Systematic Review Methods to Derive Minimum Clinically Important Differences 2020 Abstracts
Using a figure to display characteristics of studies in reviews of complex interventions or reviews with broad questions 2018 Edinburgh
Using a hospital evidence-based practice center (EPC) to inform nursing policy and practice: assessing impact 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using a hospital evidence-based practice centre (EPC) to inform nursing policy and practice: Describing an approach 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using a Logic Model Framework Synthesis to map experiences of robotic companion animals in care homes 2018 Edinburgh
Using a matrix analysis to integrate findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis and a review of effectiveness: a worked example 2020 Abstracts
Using a problem-based learning method for teaching evidence-based medicine in China: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using a sci-fi narrative and medical simulation to design clinical trials in unexpected emergencies 2020 Abstracts
Using a scoping review to identify promising gender-sensitive health promotion interventions for women 2013 Québec City
Using a scoping review to prioritize primary research: impact of simulated patients on first aid training of laypeople 2019 Santiago
Using a search filter to improve literature searching efficiency for clinical question updating 2013 Québec City
Using a systematic review to develop a taxonomy of uncertainties in health care to structure the design of future participatory research 2023 London
Using a theory driven mixed-method review to assess the benefits of complex environmental-health programmes. Cochrane Public Health Group review CD010351 2013 Québec City
Using a Virtual Journal Club Platform to Teach and Assess Evidence-Based Practice Critical Appraisal Skills: A Pilot Study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using advanced features in the Cochrane Register of Studies 2012 Auckland
Using AGREE II to assess the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for Chagas disease 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using AI tools to support storyboarding as a means of synthesis for qualitative evidence 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using AMSTAR to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis of animal studies in China 2013 Québec City
Using AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews: An external validation study 2011 Madrid
Using and generating relevant evidence in LMICs by actively engaging stakeholders 2012 Auckland
Using arm-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes for generalizability of findings across baseline risk values 2023 London
Using Artificial Intelligence to Answer Context Questions in Systematic Reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Artificial intelligence Tools to increase the efficiency of Systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using automation tools to improve the speed of searching for studies for a systematic review 2019 Santiago
Using Bayesian information for matching qualitative and quantitative sources in a mixed studies review 2018 Edinburgh
Using BestEvidence to inform health decisions 2019 Santiago
Using bibliometrics to evaluate impact of systematic reviews in disability and rehabilitation research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the effects of exercise on pain and disability in osteoarthritis 2013 Québec City
Using Children and Adolescents as Standardized Patients in Health: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map 2020 Abstracts
Using citation-management software for more efficient screening of search results in systematic reviews 2010 Keystone
Using Clinical Study Reports versus published articles in a Cochrane Review update 2016 Seoul
Using clinical trial data to restore the trial literature: what and how to ‘RIAT’? 2018 Edinburgh
Using co-design to develop reusable learning apps to promote evidence-based healthcare across borders 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Cochrane Interactive Learning with students: building a foundation for evidence-based medicine 2018 Edinburgh
Using Cochrane methods to strengthen health policy in Nepal: what is the quality of evidence cited in existing health sector plans? 2014 Hyderabad
Using Cochrane reviews for patient-centred information on the management of low-back pain 2004 Ottawa
Using Cochrane Reviews in policy agenda setting, choice and implementation 2013 Québec City
Using Cochrane reviews to develop consumer information - choosing and presenting outcomes 2004 Ottawa
Using Cochrane Reviews to ensure best practices to achieve optimal attainment of the Malaysian MDG 4 and 5 mortality indicators 2016 Seoul
Using Cochrane reviews to help reduce fetal and other perinatal deaths in high income countries 2010 Keystone
Using Cochrane reviews to identify research gaps in the perinatal evidence 2006 Dublin
Using Cochrane Reviews to improve critical appraisal skills and clinical decision making in problem-based learning 2013 Québec City
Using Cochrane reviews to inform future research 2015 Vienna
Using Cochrane Systematic Reviews in real life—experiences from teaching health science students and professionals to access and utilize Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
Using Covidence to support multiple teams to collaborate on scoping reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using crowdsourcing and machine learning for study identification: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Cochrane’s Screen4Me workflow 2020 Abstracts
Using cumulative meta-analysis methods for prioritizing Cochrane Review updates 2015 Vienna
Using Different Knowledge: A Case Study of Cannabis Use for Health Conditions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using directed acyclic graphs as an approach for inclusion criteria of meta-analyses with non-randomized trials 2007 Sao Paulo
Using e-mail for identifying unpublished and ongoing clinical trials and those published in non-indexed journals 2004 Ottawa
Using electronic searching to retrieve additional randomized controlled trials missed by full text searching 1997 Amsterdam
Using EpiData software to extract data for Cochrane systematic reviews 2011 Madrid
Using Epistemonikos to create a one-stop shop for systematic reviews in dentistry 2019 Santiago
Using EPPI-Reviewer to create a Cochrane Review (workshop in Spanish) 2019 Santiago
Using evaluations as learning and programme-improvement tools – Lessons from Uganda 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using evidence and other perspectives to inform health policy in low- and middle-income countries: nucleic acid amplification tests to detect transfusion transmissible infections in blood donors 2014 Hyderabad
Using evidence beyond an empirically available time horizon: should it be done? 2006 Dublin
Using evidence in management decisions: Developing and implementing a Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment Unit in Colombia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using evidence mapping and synthesis to support healthier life trajectories: The case of the WHO Life Course Program 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using evidence syntheses: views and experiences of public health decision makers and review authors in the United Kingdom 2014 Hyderabad
Using evidence to define policy and influence practice - a case study of the Northern Sydney Fractured Neck of Femur (FNOF) Project 1996 Adelaide
Using evidence to improve lives: A rapid systematic approach 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using evidence to make decisions in guideline development: The Evidence to Decision Framework (EtD) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Evidence to nurture multi-actor dialogue in the public sector: Lessons from the Paliament of Uganda 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using evidence to stop ineffective practice: The UK Cochrane Centre (UKCC) and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) work together 2011 Madrid
Using existing guidelines to generate recommendations for promoting physical activity among older people: a GRADE approach 2012 Auckland
Using existing systematic reviews to identify the evidence gaps for resilient health systems: a novel methodology 2023 London
Using FASD prevalence rates to inform prevention efforts 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using flow to estimate the percentage contribution of studies in network meta-analysis 2018 Edinburgh
Using full information on cut-offs per study to determine an optimal cut-off in diagnostic test accuracy reviews 2015 Vienna
Using games to teach Cochrane concepts 2019 Santiago
Using Google Translate for Malay translation of Cochrane plain language summaries: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) 2018 Edinburgh
Using GRADE in public-health guidelines – challenges and some solutions? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence from intervention reviews (advanced methods) 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using GRADE to develop an evidence-based benchmark for a rate: the use case of the patient safety indicator ‘postoperative venous thromboembolism’ 2012 Auckland
Using GRADE to engage healthcare professionals and managers in shared learning and collaborative development and implementation of local guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence in Chinese systematic reviews 2012 Auckland
Using GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence in systematic reviews about Chinese traditional medicine 2013 Québec City
Using GRADE to integrate randomised and non-randomised studies in systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using GRADE-CERQual to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: how well are review authors applying the approach? 2023 London
Using GRADEpro to create ‘Summary of Findings’ tables 2012 Auckland
Using harmonised results of different tests for a single biomarker in test accuracy meta-analysis 2019 Santiago
Using health-technology assessment in universal health coverage: From learning to practice 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using High Quality Evidence Based Consumer Health Information for Non-therapeutic Patient Advice in Germany. 2002 Stavanger
Using implementation levers to translate evidence into practice 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using innovative methods in trial identification for 12 Cochrane Intervention Reviews 2015 Vienna
Using IPD meta-analysis to explore health and care inequalities among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people 2018 Edinburgh
Using JBIs’ approach to integrate evidence into clinical practice. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Large Language Models in Assessing Bias Risk in Cohort Studies 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using large language models to assess the compliance of randomized controlled trials on AI interventions with CONSORT-AI: a cross-sectional survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using living systematic reviews to support evidence-informed shared decision-making: a case study of cannabis use for health conditions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using machine learning as a study design filter for systematic reviews of RCTs 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using machine learning to automate data extraction from RCTs — hands on with RobotReviewer 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using machine learning to automate the broad screening process - a research update 2006 Dublin
Using machine learning to reduce the systematic review workload 2010 Keystone
Using MECIR standards in developing and evaluating Cochrane Reviews of interventions 2012 Auckland
Using MECIR standards in the conduct of systematic reviews with emphasis on associated Common Errors—Part 2 2013 Québec City
Using MECIR standards in the conduct of systematic reviews, with emphasis on associated common errors 2014 Hyderabad
Using MECIR standards in the interpretation and presentation of results in Cochrane Reviews of interventions – Part 1 2013 Québec City
Using meta-study to synthesize the results of qualitative research: the role of theory 2008 Freiburg
Using Microsoft Academic Graph in a rapid review of reviews on vaccine uptake 2020 Abstracts
Using Microsoft Academic Graph to maintain Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Registers of controlled trials and economic evaluations 2020 Abstracts
Using mixed methods to identify successful school-based asthma interventions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using mixed-effects meta-analysis to examine the impact of study design, patient characteristics, and treatment intensity in a systematic review of music therapy for serious mental disorders 2008 Freiburg
Using more than one systematic review as evidence base for a guideline recommendation: Updating the National Disease Management Guideline (NDMG) Asthma 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Multifaced Strategies and Social media to Promote Knowledge Translation of Cochrane Review: Taiwan 10 year experiences 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using narrative statements to communicate evidence from knowledge syntheses 2018 Edinburgh
Using narratives and storytelling to influence health policy-making: findings and implications from a mixed-methods systematic review 2018 Edinburgh
Using overview of systematic reviews to identify topics for health systems living reviews 2020 Abstracts
Using patient-important outcomes for systematic reviews: a joint Cochrane and COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) workshop 2018 Edinburgh
Using PICO to establish a framework for a comprehensive clinical guideline 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using priority setting to enhance the policy relevance of systematic reviews: a case study from the South African Initiative for Systematic Reviews on Health Policies and Systems 2015 Vienna
Using ProCite for creating and submitting trials databases to CENTRAL 2005 Melbourne
Using program theory to understand heterogeneity in systematic effectiveness reviews 2011 Madrid
Using purposive sampling within qualitative evidence synthesis: experiences from a Cochrane Review of parents’ views and experiences of vaccination communication 2015 Vienna
Using QUADAS-2 in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies: survey of users’ experience 2013 Québec City
Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in diverse ways to explore intervention complexity: how two QCA approaches were valuable within a single review 2019 Santiago
Using qualitative evidence to inform a review of effectiveness: A case study of integrating qualitative data in a systematic review of effectiveness of ECT for adult depression 2011 Madrid
Using qualitative methods to assess impact of public involvement in a UK national lung cancer screening health technology assessment (HTA) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using qualitative research to explore heterogeneity in a Cochrane Review 2013 Québec City
Using Real World Data to Tackle Health Inequalities: Informing Guidelines and Promoting Equity 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using real-world data to analyze the offer of medicines incorporated in the Brazilian public health system between 2012 and 2016. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Real-World Evidence to Augment Systematic Review Findings 2023 London
Using reference manager (Mendeley) in systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using Response-adaptive Randomization (RAR) Platform to Explore Potential Effective Treatments during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in China 2020 Abstracts
Using ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Using ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions 2018 Edinburgh
Using RobotReviewer to assist humans in conducting risk of bias assessments—a randomized user study 2019 Santiago