• Impact of an upper respiratory infection (URI) clinical guideline on costs and outcomes of care
• Impact of asymmetry of summary ROC curves in meta-analyses comparing diagnostic test accuracy
• Impact of baseline score imbalance on comparative effectiveness reviews
• Impact of clinical recommendations informed by Cochrane diagnostic accuracy reviews for infectious diseases prevalent in low- and middle-income countries
• Impact of Cochrane Corners in Portuguese journals
• Impact of Cochrane reviews on health technology assessments
• Impact of Cochrane systematic reviews of public health interventions for physical activity
• Impact of community animal health services: A systematic review
• Impact of cut-offs on guideline synopses for the preparation of disease-management programmes
• IMPACT OF DATA EXTRACTION BY A SINGLE REVIEWER ON EFFECT ESTIMATES FROM META-ANALYSES
• Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on malignant tumours among type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis
• Impact of duplicate publication in a meta-analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
• Impact of excluding non-English studies on network meta-analysis: an empirical study
• Impact of Expectation Bias on Effect Estimates between Non-inferiority and Superiority Randomized Clinical Trials: Retrospective Cohort Study
• Impact of funding source on reporting of adverse effects: methodological overview
• Impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cancer among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Impact of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) on conclusions of dentistry systematic reviews
• Impact of Grey Literature on Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials - A Systematic Review
• Impact of including conference abstracts in systematic reviews: analysis from a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of COVID-19
• Impact of including Korean RCTs in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
• Impact of incretin-based therapies on abdominal pain among people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Impact of infrastructure and direct funding on Cochrane reviews
• Impact of missing outcome data for participants in trials included in five Cochrane Reviews: an imputation study
• Impact of missing outcome data for trial participants included in 100 meta-analyses: an imputation study
• Impact of National Institute for Health Research Cochrane Incentive Scheme on the time to deliver Cochrane Reviews
• Impact of pay-for-performance on behavior of primary care physicians and patient outcomes: a systematic review
• Impact of pay-for-performance on diabetic patients and physicians: a systematic review
• Impact of pilot/feasibility studies in meta-analyses of acupuncture: a meta-epidemiological study
• Impact of point-of-care diagnostics on maternal outcomes in HIV-infected women: Systematic review and meta-analysis
• Impact of quality items on study outcome: treatments in acute lateral ankle sprains
• Impact of quality of reporting of treatment-related harms on overall therapeutic effects
• Impact of randomised controlled trials reporting modified intention to treat on meta-analysis: preliminary results
• Impact of reported vs. actual methodological quality assessment on treatment effect size
• Impact of reporting quality on risk of bias assessment in occupational health and safety trials
• Impact of reporting the number treated needlesslyon perceived effectiveness and decision to adopt an intervention
• Impact of Retracted Randomized Controlled Trials on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Study
• Impact of scoring the quality of clinical trials in result of meta-analysis
• Impact of searching on LILACS database for Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Impact of short inter-pregnancy interval on pregnancy outcome in a low-income country
• Impact of the 2010 Cochrane review 'Interventions for vitiligo'
• Impact of the Restoring Invisible & Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative on Cochrane evidence products
• Impact of the retracted non-Cochrane Review on clinical practice guidelines
• Impact of the trial registration initiative in Latin America and the Caribbean: a study of randomized controlled trials published in 2010
• Impact of training and guidance on the inter-rater and inter-consensus reliability of risk of bias instruments for non-randomized studies
• Impact of translations on access to Cochrane Reviews
• IMPACT OF UNCONVENTIONAL NATURAL GAS OR PETROLEUM HYDRAULIC FRACTURING “FRACKING” ON HUMAN HEALTH- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
• Impact of unpublished data from industry sponsored trials on drug assessments
• Impact of vaccination on antibiotic usage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Impact, accountability, and sustainability of the Cochrane prioritization project - Eyes and Vision Group experience
• Impacts of climate change on health and health systems: Producing evidence syntheses to support decision-making
• Implementation and context: a concept analysis
• Implementation and evaluation of an international standardized operating protocol for the prevention of wrong site surgery in Germany
• Implementation and evaluation of the RAISE initiative: supporting low and middle income countries to adapt and implement health systems guidelines
• Implementation and impact of reviews Cochrane reviews: are they as useful as we would like to think?
• Implementation and impact of reviews To randomise or not to randomise: a matter of perspective?
• Implementation and translation frameworks in low- and middle-income countries, international collaboration
• Implementation of ‘Risk of bias’ (RoB) tables and ‘Summary of findings’ (SoF) tables in Cochrane reviews: a pilot study
• Implementation of a structured medication handover process: An evidence-based project
• Implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review
• Implementation of basic newborn resuscitation guidelines among healthcare providers in Maragua District Hospital: A best-practice implementation project
• Implementation of Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro - the first Affiliate Centre of Cochrane Brazil Network
• Implementation of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews: an Italian project
• Implementation of evidence-based indications for prevention of cardiovascular disease at a community level: an integrated project in the metropolitan area of Naples
• Implementation of evidence-based indications for prevention of cardiovascular disease at a community level: an integrated project in the metropolitan area of Naples
• Implementation of evidence-based practice at a regional hospital in
• Implementation of evidence-based practice in the Swedish social services – tensions and dilemmas
• Implementation of evidence-based practice: evaluation of an opinion-leader strategy
• Implementation of modern medical knowledge in management of patients with hepatitis B in Ukraine
• Implementation of prospective trial registration in the field of otolarynchology
• Implementation of ROBINS-I in non-randomized studies of interventions that have produced qualitatively conflicting results to randomized studies
• Implementation of Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in Cochrane review groups: progress to date
• Implementation of the evidence-based health discipline in the Professional Master's Program of Health State Government Department, Federal District, Brazil
• Implementation of the GRADE method for developing recommendations on the use of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus
• Implementation of the transparent and rigour evidence-based methodology of clinical practice guideline development in the Czech Republic
• Implementation research in China: a review of evidence in making policy, process and translation
• Implementation strategies for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
• Implementation strategies: what are Indian studies?
• Implementation, improved care and back again
• Implementing a HTA-unit in a university-affiliated child welfare agency: the challenge of adapting the medical model of HTA to the social services context
• Implementing a model for improving integrated primary healthcare planning and performance: An effectiveness evaluation of DIVA in Kaduna, Nigeria
• Implementing a school vision screening programme using smartphone technology in southern Botswana
• Implementing and disseminating knowledge in the care home setting: a systematic scoping review
• Implementing and evaluating a remedial education programme in Kenyan’ refugee camps
• Implementing best practice guidelines through computerized decision support: providing meaningful tools for cardiovascular risk and diabetes management
• Implementing evidence through a systematic search
• Implementing evidence-based laboratory order sets within a CPOE in primary care in Belgium: A cluster RCT
• Implementing guidelines in an academic hospital
• Implementing multilayered presentation formats in a new generation of trustworthy clinical practice guidelines
• Implementing the evidence: developing theory, improving practice
• Implementing the extended risk of bias tool for non-randomised studies: feedback from the Cochrane Epilepsy Group
• Implementing the findings from systematic overviews: has information on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of SSRIs changed practice?
• Implications of centering racial health equity in systematic reviews: results of qualitative interviews with stakeholders
• Implications of different methods for literature searching and assessment in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A case study
• Implications of searching multiple trial registries: how should we search ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP?
• Importance of author inquiries
• Importance of consensus methods and involving end users to develop evidence-based materials when evidence is scarce: a Red Cross example
• Importance of patient participation at protocol stage and its impact on outcomes – experience from a network meta-analysis with breast cancer patients
• Important gaps in the evidence: patients and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important research questions in urinary incontinence
• Important items at protocol preparation were not reported in the PROSPERO regarding systematic reviews of prediction models
• Improved indexing Of randomised controlled trials has enabled computer search strategies to identify them with high sensitivity and specificity, in pain relief research.
• Improvement in adopting evidence-based medicine – a cross-sectional study
• Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
• Improvement of the development of clinical practice guidelines: Use of systematic reviews in its construction
• Improvements in the GRADE approach to network meta-analysis
• Improving 'Implications for research' sections of Cochrane reviews
• Improving access to reports of RCTs in Embase: innovative methods enhance the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
• Improving alignment between research priorities and needs of people with multiple sclerosis: A worldwide, multi-stakeholder priority setting exercise
• Improving communication in multi-disciplinary review teams: reflections on the co-production and use of plain language protocol summaries
• Improving diversity in Cochrane through capacity building: what are the challenges in Nigeria?
• Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in Journals
• Improving Field Knowledge Translation through exchange with users
• Improving GRADE evidence profiles and 'Summary of findings' tables: detailed guidance for time-to-event data
• Improving knowledge on evidence-based health care (EBHC) in a middle-income country with short courses
• Improving our quality by developing the HIV/AIDS Specialized Register: experiences and lessons from the inaugural Cochrane Collaboration Visiting Fellowship
• Improving pharmaceutical use in primary care in developing countries: a critical review
• Improving placebo design of randomized placebo-controlled trials of traditional Chinese herbal medicine
• Improving practice: Rx for Change - an intervention research database for healthcare decision-makers and researchers
• Improving Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) in end-of-life care research
• Improving public health policy in Brazil: evidence-based health assistance for all
• Improving quality of N-of-1 trials in high impact factor medical journals
• Improving reporting quality of practice guidelines: RIGHT statement and its extension
• Improving retrieval of clinical trials in the LILACS database
• Improving search efficiency for economic evaluations in major databases using semantic technology
• Improving systematic review evidence use through better stakeholder engagement
• Improving the 'Implications for practice/research' section of a Cochrane Review using a survey questionnaire
• Improving the care pathway for women who request postpartum contraception: an experience-based co-design study
• Improving the conduct and reporting of narrative synthesis of quantitative data (ICONS-Quant): rationale and update of the ICONS-Quant project
• Improving the efficiency of searches in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Improving the efficiency of updating Cochrane Reviews: a joint pilot project of the McMaster PLUS database team and the musculoskeletal review group
• Improving the experience of Cochrane podcast listeners: a Croatian case study
• Improving the health status of ex-prisoners: Hard lessons learned in reviewing complex interventions with multiple outcomes
• Improving the international coverage of controlled trials: A search of the Australasian medical index
• Improving the Interpretation of Health-related Quality of Life Evidence in Meta-analyses
• Improving the participation of women from developing countries in the Cochrane Collaboration: A pilot study
• Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance
• Improving the production and content of Cochrane podcasts: a Croatian case study
• Improving the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Peru
• Improving the Quality of Cochrane Reviews - a pilot project
• Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement
• Improving the quality of systematic reviews through teaching: The Joanna Briggs Institute Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program
• Improving the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for assessing the validity of clinical trials
• Improving the reporting and conduct of narrative synthesis of quantitative data (ICONS-Quant): a pilot of the ICONS-Quant tool
• Improving the usability and efficiency of trial registration and updating processes on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)
• Improving transparency and accountability of priority setting exercises: time for a reporting guideline?
• Improving usability on Cochrane websites
• Improving vaccination uptake among adolescents (Review)
• Improving visual interpretation of results: a graphical tool for summarising multiple interrupted time series
• Improving Wikipedia skin disease content
• Improving Wikipedia skin disease content
• Imputation of missing adjusted data for non-significant factors in meta-analysis of prognostic studies
• Imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE
• Imputing 2x2 contingency tables from odds ratios: Difficulties, constraints and impact in meta-analysis results
• Imputing summary statistics for meta-analysis of continuous data
• In a systematic review, is consequence of exposure the same as effect of intervention? Reflections on the challenges in conducting a systematic review on the sexual consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
• In Some Systematic Reviews Placebos May Not be Necessary: An Example From a Statin Dose-Response Study
• IN SUM: mapping the evidence on effects of child mental health and welfare interventions
• In what ways can synthesising qualitative research be systematic?
• Inadequate descriptions of treatments in published reports: a common but correctable barrier to new effective interventions
• Inadequate reporting of outcomes measured on ordinal and interval scales in relation to meta-analysis
• Incidence of randomised trials with modified intention-to-treat analysis in the medical literature: a systematic review update
• Including diverse study types in systematic reviews to address multiple questions about public health interventions: The case of a review of school effects on health
• Including equity in systematic reviews: Using the new PRISMA-Equity Extension reporting guidelines for reviews with a focus on equity
• Including evidence about the impact of tests on patient management in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
• Including interrupted time series (ITS) designs in systematic reviews
• Including literature based data in individual patient data meta-analyses
• Including non-inferiority trials in meta-analyses of chronic medical conditions
• Including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews of vaccines safety: methodological issues
• Including non-randomised studies or letting them go unchallenged? - Experiences from a Cochrane review on screening for malignant melanoma
• Including non-randomized studies in network meta-analyses: a case of sparsely reported adverse event data
• Including non-standard studies and non-standard data in a meta-analysis
• Including observational evidence in a network meta-analysis of RCTs: a case study in schizophrenia
• Including patient perspectives in health technology assessments supplements clinical findings and provides valuable information for health services design and delivery
• Including process evaluations in systematic reviews: reflections from a review of sexual health promotion
• Including unpublished data in a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy: impact on summary estimates
• Including women’s opinions when selecting outcomes for study reusing Individual Participant Data from IPPIC repository
• Inclusion criteria for systematic reviews: what is the most valid approach?
• Inclusion of alternative study designs for evaluating clinical interventions that require implementation of services in Cochrane Reviews
• Inclusion of non-randomized studies: reflections from a complex systematic review of multi-component organizational interventions
• Inclusion of observational studies in systematic reviews
• Inclusion of studies and statistics in meta-analysis: a comparison between Cochrane and systematic reviews from other high impact factor journals
• Incomplete or inaccurate information on the number of patients lost to follow up presented in Kaplan-Meier curves and in the text of published studies
• Inconsistencies are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)
• Inconsistency identification in Network Meta-Analysis via Stochastic Search Variable Selection
• Inconsistency in risk of bias assessments performed by tools used in physical therapy versus Cochrane 'Risk of bias' domain approach
• Inconsistent evaluation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in Cochrane systematic reviews: are harm-benefit balance truly being appraised?
• Inconsistent quality of reporting of searching clinical trials registries in Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols
• Inconsistent reporting of analyses in selected industry-sponsored clinical trials
• Incorporating data from atypical experimental study designs in systematic reviews: experiences from Cochrane Infectious Diseases
• Incorporating data on adverse effects in systematic reviews
• Incorporating data on adverse effects into systematic reviews
• Incorporating Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion into Cochrane Systematic Reviews with AI
• Incorporating evidence-based medicine into a consensus technique
• Incorporating external information on between-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis
• Incorporating information on funding and conflicts of interest in trials when conducting a Cochrane Review - the TACIT tool
• Incorporating methodological quality in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies
• Incorporating multiple interventions in meta­analysis: mixed treatment comparisons or adjusted indi­rect comparisons
• Incorporating non-trial data into systematic reviews: opportunities and risks
• Incorporating number of events as estimated from the Kaplan Meier curves in a literature based meta-analysis: When the going gets tough, should we get going?
• Incorporating patients' perspectives in hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients
• Incorporating patients' preferences in the development of a core outcome set for four chronic conditions: COMPAR-EU project