• Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot for assessing the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis
• Graphical plots for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis
• Graphical presentation of diagnostic information: a methodological review
• Graphical representation of overlap degree of primary studies in systematic reviews included in overviews
• Graphs in meta-analysis: worth more than a thousand words?
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis: a hands-on tutorial in STATA
• Graphs to enhance understanding and improve interpretability of the evidence from network meta-analysis: a hands-on tutorial in STATA ***In computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Grey literature in systematic reviews: a practical approach to searching and including in systematic reviews
• Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations
• Group social skills interventions on children and young adults with autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Growing the evidence base to advance respectful maternity care: How effective implementation science partnerships can move evidence into action
• Growing the North West Coast Cochrane Support Network
• Growth and development of the South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials
• Growth of Cochrane activity and evidence-based practice in Malaysia: the impact of the SEA-ORCHID project
• Guidance for conducting and reporting equity-related systematic reviews
• Guidance for conducting and reporting equity-related systematic reviews
• Guidance for conducting overviews of reviews: results from a scoping review and qualitative metasummary
• Guidance for developing evaluation frameworks for health technologies
• Guidance for including non-randomised studies (NRS) in Cochrane reviews: conclusions from an invited workshop
• Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: A scoping review update
• Guidance for the systematic review of economic evidence
• Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a comparison of guidance-led narrative synthesis versus meta-analysis
• Guide for patients' involvement in the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rare Diseases
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 1
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 2
• Guideline development and Cochrane reviews: criteria and principles for selecting systematic reviews to answer guideline clinical questions
• Guideline development in 2024: the continuing challenge to place knowledge and clinical practice on a secure footing
• Guideline development in lower-middle income countries hosting refugees using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT framework: insights from Jordan
• Guideline Expert Panels: Practical Approaches for Productive and Effective Participation
  
• Guideline on multimorbidity of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM)
• Guideline use behaviours and needs of primary-care practitioners in China: A cross-sectional survey
• Guideline-based clinical decision support framework related to multimorbidity: a protocol for development
• Guidelines – improving quality, or providing care with fewer resources? Or both?
• Guidelines and postpartum mothers’ behaviour concerning antibiotic therapy and bacterial resistance
• Guidelines and quality improvement: methods and tools for an integrated methodological framework.
  
• Guidelines for conducting and reporting reviews of reviews: Dealing with topic relevance and double-counting
• Guidelines for end-user peer review of Cochrane reviews and protocols - with a view to clinical guidelines
• Guidelines for preparing Cochrane reviews relevant to developing countries
• Guidelines for rare diseases: Why are they so difficult to develop?
• Guidelines for reporting adverse effects in clinical trials should be improved - lessons from acute pain
• Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions
• Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions: evaluating their use in practice
• Guidelines of antiretroviral therapies for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV: to promote the development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines
• Gynaecological Cancer Group - NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme
• GYNECOCARE: PROMOTING EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPORT FOR BRAZILIAN WOMEN
• Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than two years after the protocol
• Half-time for SDG evidence generation: Insights from the Development Evidence Portal
  
• Hand searching of Finnish medical journals
• Hand-searching for studies other than randomised trials
• Handling languages other than English in systematic reviews to ensure accessibility: reflections from an international working group
• Handling missing data in a randomized controlled trial: example from an Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) trial
• Handling missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: systematic survey of the methods literature
• Handling multiple outcome measures
• Handling outcome multiplicity in systematic reviews on educational interventions: lessons learned from a review on first aid training for laypeople
• Handling time-varying treatments in observational studies: a scoping review and recommendations
  
• Handling trial participants with missing data in meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes: guidance for systematic reviewers
• Handling trial participants with missing dichotomous outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a methodological survey of proposed approaches
• Handling trial participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: systematic survey of the methods literature
• Handsearch and electronic search projects in Japan
• Handsearching and description of controlled clinical trials in Spanish language dental journals
• Handsearching and descriptive analysis of controlled clinical trials published in Geriatrics biomedical journals in Spain and Latin America
• Handsearching and descriptive analysis of controlled clinical trials published in neurology biomedical journals in Spain
• Handsearching for 'buried' randomized trials in Bahrain medical journals
• Handsearching for health promotion and public health trials and systematic reviews
• Handsearching for reports of diagnostic test accuracy studies: adding to the evidence base
• Handsearching in german paediatric journals
• Handsearching of randomised clinical trials published in Spanish journals in ophthalmology
• Handsearching online journals - do we need new rules?
• Handsearching respiratory conference abstracts: a comparison with abstracts identified by an EMBASE search
• Handwash versus handrub practices for preventing nosocomial infection in hospital intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• Haploidentical versus matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Happier Together: Sibling Joint Enrollment in Daycare
  
• Hard times: consideration of the resource impact of recommendations
• Hard-to-reach and difficult-to-define: searching for 'hidden’ populations. An example from public health
• Harmonising clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making
• Harmonising Cochrane content in the CRS: moving towards a nimble global dataset
• Harmonising Cochrane content: the CRS, the Cochrane Linked Data project and HarmoniSR
• Harmonising routinely collected HIV-cascade-related data to strengthen monitoring and evaluation and support service management
• Harmonization of explanations for common judgments about the quality of evidence in summary of findings tables
• Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Global Evidence-Based Practice: Synergy, Collaboration, and Impact
  
• Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Systematic Review Methods
• Harnessing the efficiencies of machine learning and Cochrane Crowd to identify randomised trials for individual Cochrane Reviews
• Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in evidence retrieval and synthesis: a paradigm shift in health care research
• Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals can be bizarrely narrow when heterogeneity is very low
• Has completeness and quality of systematic review and meta-analysis reporting in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Subtitle: is completeness of reporting associated with study quality?
• Hazard ratios in the Summary of Findings table: experience of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group
• HBsAg level is an important predictor of HCC in low risk HBV carriers: evidence-based analysis
• Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre: Mapping policy evidence-needs to support evidence-based decision-making
• Health behaviour change
• Health care outcomes assessed with non-experimental designs compared with those assessed in randomised trials
• Health care seeking for maternal and newborn illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies
• Health data sharing in the Czech Republic: from national methodology to practical use in data-driven decision-making
• Health economics methods: from effectiveness to efficiency in systematic reviews
• Health Emergency Interim Guidelines: Designing a tool-kit for WHO
• Health Equity and Gender Equality: Transforming Evidence into Policy – Lessons from In-Situ Slum Housing Upgradation in South Asia
  
• Health equity and implications for evidence synthesis
  
• Health equity and patients included: implications for systematic reviews
• Health equity and patients included: implications for systematic reviews
• Health Equity: Implications for Systematic Reviews
• Health in my Language: Are health domain adapted machine translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries more useful to readers than having no translation in their language?
• Health in my Language: Can post-editing of health domain adapted machine translation speed up translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries, and do translators like it?
• Health in my language: Evaluating health-domain adapted machine translation for Cochrane plain language summaries
• Health in my Language: evaluation of health domain adapted machine translation for Cochrane Reviews
• Health in my Language: health domain adapted machine translation as a means to tackle the resource issues for translation
• Health incident management system: SIGIS
• Health literacy levels in multimorbidity: A systematic review and meta- analysis
  
• Health policy integrating with systematic reviews
• Health priority research questions based on evidence in Brazil: implementation and maintenance of free access web site for researchers, academics, health professionals and consumers
• Health promotion, public health and the health of young people: a systematic map of inequalities research
• Health related quality of life in ovarian carcinoma: methodological issues in randomised controlled trials
• Health related quality of life measured by SF-36 for adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis
• Health Systems Evidence: the development of a ‘one-stop-shop’ of health systems research evidence to support policymaking
• Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in health services: The Sentinel Network as a forum for Evidence Based Health
• Health Technology Assessment in India: a beginning for healthcare decision making
• Health Technology Assessment of Dialysis Membranes: Baseline Report
• Health Technology Assessment of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Induced Abortion: Baseline Report
• Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: A qualitative evidence synthesis
• Healthy work environments: the experience of conducting a series of comprehensive systematic reviews, including the review of qualitative research and non-research data
• Help! Where do I begin? A troubleshooting guide to updating a Cochrane intervention review as a new review author
• Helping Cochrane Reviews soar: a workshop to create a communication and dissemination strategy for every Cochrane Review
• Helping doctors to understand screening tests
• Helping ministers and senior officials understand Cochrane evidence
• Helping readers understand review update status: Pilot of a simple system
• Helping the cause of trusted evidence: the work of Cochrane Germany, Austria and Switzerland
• Helping to ensure review relevance: exploring the potential benefits and costs of multi-perspective review advisory groups
• Hepatitis A immunisation in South Africa: Using Cochrane reviews as a part of decision-making
• Heterogeneity and complexity within reviews of social research: the perspective of ‘divergent’ reviews
• Heterogeneity estimates fluctuate according to the number of pooled trials
• Heterogeneity in diagnostic-test accuracy Cochrane reviews
• Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: misconceiving I²
• Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews
• Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies
• Heterogeneity in systematic reviews on spinal surgery: A meta-epidemiological study
• Heterogeneity sample size correction factor for meta-analyses
• Hidden conflicts of interests in meta-analyses of pharmacological treatments
• Hidden voices: Towards participant-led research in gender-based violence
• Hide and seek! Looking for studies included and (missing) links to other versions
• Hierarchical network meta-analysis models accounting for variability in nodes by treatment, dosage-category and single dosage
• High 5s project. Hospital survey on patient safety culture results from Germany
• High dropout rates in trials included in Cochrane reviews
• High First Dose Quinine for Treating Severe Malaria
• High impact collaborations: Examples from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS group
• High level evidence in oncology - just how many systematic reviews?
• High proportion of high quality randomized clinical trials conducted by the NCI are negative or inconclusive
• High quality data abstraction for systematic reviews: from form development to data exportation
• High Quality Evidence in ENT - Where are the RCTs?
• High risk cancer screening in workers exposed to asbestos. Application of evidence through partnerships in managing injured workers
• High risk of bias in many systematic reviews
• High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes
• High-level evidence of acupuncture analgesia published in PubMed-listed journals: A descriptive analysis
• Higher-order asymptotics for random effects meta-analysis: an empirical evaluation
• Highlights and challenges of co-creating evidence-based knowledge translation tools for parents about the COVID-19 pandemic
• HIRA’s evidence supports rational decision making
• Hitting the right target—disseminating Cochrane Review findings for greatest impact
• HIV / AIDS and behaviour change - The impact of Soul City at an individual and broader community level of analysis.
• HIV and progressive resistive exercise: a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review
• HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): a systematic review integrating "qualitative" studies and trials.
• HIV/AIDS and oral candidiasis: what really works?
• HIV/AIDS reviewer mentoring programme for South Asia
• Hodgkin Lymphoma in patients infected by HIV under the combined antiretroviral therapy: a meta-analysis
  
• Home versus centre based physical activity programs in older adults
• Hone your skills as consumer referees for Cochrane reviews
• Hooked on evidence-based consumer health information: the experience of a new bi-lingual national website
• Horizon scanning in multiple sclerosis decisions in Brazil
• Host a Cochrane Associate Centre! The impact of Cochrane Madrid, much more than reviews
• How ‘evidence-based’ is Wikipedia?
• How ‘similar’ are studies included in Cochrane Reviews?
• How a Cochrane Systematic Review Changed National and International Policy and Practice
• How a health technology assessment (HTA) agency may promote evidence-based health care and research
• How a systematic review and continued stakeholder engagement can lead to a theory of change relevant to the aid sector
• How accessible is the Cochrane Library for health professionals with little or no previous knowledge of the site?
• How accurate are abstracts and how can we Improve their accuracy?
• How action helps to produce evidence: Factors influencing the production of systematic reviews conducted by the Cochrane HIV/AIDS group
• How and when to pool data in meta-analyses to make the results clinically meaningful
• How and when to stop living guideline recommendations?
• How and where to search for secondary evidence on ‘upstream’ interventions for public health problems: a case study
• How and why do evidence-based screening recommendations from national guideline institutions differ: cross sectional study.
• How applicable is evidence from randomized controlled trials to patients receiving stroke rehabilitation in England?
  
• How approaches to public and professional involvement can vary across evidence synthesis projects while still involving the principles of co-production
  
• How are guidelines on topics with little scientific evidence developed and how are decisions made?
• How are policy-makers using the evidence? Models of research utilisation in theory and practice
• How are qualitative methods being used alongside complex health service randomized controlled trials? A systematic review
• How are realist reviews conducted? A systematic mapping review of realist reviews
• How are stakeholders involved in systematic reviews? Findings from a systematic review of methods.
• How are the topics of Cochrane reviews decided?
• How big are the biases associated with non-randomised designs used in evaluations of healthcare interventions? An empirical investigation.
• How blind are we?
• How broad should you go? Searching for a public health intervention review
• How can a framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) improve the quality of Cochrane reviews?
• How can consumer input be integrated into the systematic review process?
• How can patient involvement promote systematic review development? Results of patient interview nested in a network meta-analysis
• How can researchers best employ mixed-methods to enhance the accessibility and utility of evidence reviews?
  
• How can systematic reviews of randomised trials be used for assessment of cost-effectiveness of surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress?
• How can the impacts of dissemination bias in qualitative research be detected in the context of qualitative evidence syntheses? Identifying new approaches 
• How can we accurately diagnose schizophrenia? Challenges in performing Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews in schizophrenia
• How can we ensure that Cochrane’s standards and approaches to Plain Language Summaries are implemented? A discussion workshop
• How can we improve the way we do systematic reviews?
• How can we improve trials assessing the effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for substance use? Methodological issues encountered during a systematic review