• How to measure the rate of knowledge transfer from clinical trials to clinical practice guidance
• How to meet advances in science when developing evidence-based practice guidelines: AGREE II, IOM, AMSTAR, GRADE
• How to obtain NNT from Cohenás d: Comparison of two methods
• How to optimise the implementation of a computerised decision-support tool for knee osteoarthritis in Belgian general practice?
• How to perform an advanced electronic search in the health sciences databases LILACS and IBECS
• How to plan and implement synthesis questions (part 1): using the InSynQ checklist and guide for question development
• How to plan and implement synthesis questions (part 2): Implementing PICO in RevMan to streamline data extraction and analyses
• How to popularize evidence-based medicine? An example of construction and application of methodological research advisory center
  
• How to prioritise diseases when developing clinical pathways
• How to prioritise review topics with stakeholders: A method for prioritising systematic review topics in health, education and social welfare
• How to prioritize diseases/conditions by using traditional Chinese medicine: Chinese experience
• How to provide evidence-based information and translate Cochrane reviews to lay people in a deliberative setting: the Italian and the Australian citizen juries experience on population screening
• How to provide more timely and reliable evaluations of the effects of interventions: a new Framework for Adaptive Meta-analysis (FAME)
• How to rapidly review the literature when planning a new clinical trial – a practical guide
• How to rate the certainty of prediction modelling studies in a systematic review?
• How to report research gaps in clinical practice guidelines? Findings and recommendations
• How to search for clinical trials on the LILACS database using the internet
• How to search for studies for inclusion in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
• How to search practice guidelines efficiently: systematic review
• How to select the most appropriate validity assessment for your review: the LATITUDES Network
  
• How to share evidence on Wikipedia: introduction to Wikipedia editing skills
• How to turn your Cochrane Review into a high quality scientific poster for presentation at meetings
• How to turn your Cochrane Review into a high quality scientific poster for presentation at meetings
• How to use and evaluate OpenAlex tools for efficient automated updating of systematic reviews and maps in EPPI-Reviewer
• How to use Cochrane summary of findings tables and individualized baseline risks to inform personalized care plans and population health
• How to use existing related guidelines in the development of a new guideline?
• How to use GRADE to assess, interpret and present findings of a review
• How to use GRADE to assess, interpret and present findings of a review
• How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence
• How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence
• How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence (in Spanish)
• How to write an abstract for a conference based on your Cochrane Review
• How to write evidence synthesis reports for policy makers: a nine-step practical manual
• How useful is GRADEpro for assessing evidence from epidemiological or diagnostic accuracy studies
• How Valuable is Effort to Contact Authors to Obtain Missing Data in Systematic Reviews
• How was patient involvement in shared decision making covered in Cochrane review?
• How well are we really doing? The HIV/AIDS Mentoring Programme five years on
• How well described are the interventions with physical activity in randomized clinical trials?
• How well did the consensus methods apply in the guideline development of traditional Chinese medicine：A Web-Based Survey in China
• How well do the malaria rapid diagnostic tests for detecting the asymptomatic carriers in the endemic countries?
• How well do we consider equity in efficiency analysis studies of vaccines? A systematic review of equity-informative economic evaluations of vaccines
• How Wiley have developed media coverage of Cochrane Library reviews within the international press
• How will we know whether we’re making a difference? Evaluating Cochrane’s knowledge translation impacts.
• How willing are the public to pay for anti-hypertensive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a survey in a Chinese city
• HPV vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: a synthesis study of economic evaluations
• HTA guide
• HTA-reports in digital and multilayered formats. Supporting policy-makers in well-informed decisions for new health technologies
• Human factors and ergonomics on healthcare and patient-safety practices: A systematic review
• Human infection by Strongyloides stercoralis in West Africa, 1974-2023: systematic review and meta-analysis
• Human post-editing to evaluate and compare the quality of three machine translation engines for Russian translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries
• Human Resources for Health in India: Evidence from a scoping review to inform local policy
• Human rights in guideline development: what is human rights evidence and how can it be used in guideline development?
• Human-translated abstracts for better health decision making
• Humor therapy in clinical care: Forming PICO
• Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for improving symptoms of long Covid-19 syndrome: baseline report of a living systematic review
  
• Hypericum perforatum for depression: a meta-analysis
• Hypertension, drug treatment, and sub-group analysis: a case for updating Cochrane Handbook?
• I-square statistic in meta-analysis of prevalence: worthwhile or worthless?
• ICT4D: Does the evidence match the hype?
• Ideal conditions or usual practice? The position of trials from two Cochrane reviews within the pragmaticexplanatory continuum
• Identification and analysis of search strategies and filters carried out in systematic reviews indexed in Lilacs. Overview
• Identification and authentication of claimed RCTs for Cochrane systematic review
• Identification and characterization of systematic reviews in eyes and vision
• Identification and characterization of systematic reviews in HIV/AIDS
• Identification and description of the clinical trials published in Spanish journals of general and internal medicine during the period 1971-1995
• Identification and prioritisation of essential content of an evidence-based healthcare online course for health professionals
• Identification and quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in gynecology and obstetrics journals in Andean countries
• Identification and testing of tools for the classifica­tion of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures
• Identification of authorship issues by using an authorship declaration form
• Identification of biomedical journals in Spain and Latin America
• Identification of clinical trials (CTs) conducted in Spain (1971-1995)
• Identification of Clinical Trials Published in Iberoamerica (1948-1998)
• IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS TO COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ARISING FROM THE ADAPTATION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
  
• Identification of health science publications in Spain (1971-1995)
• Identification of nursing journals in Spain and Latin America
• Identification of randomized clinical trials (RCT) in sarcoma
• Identification of systematic reviews in LILACS
• Identification of trials using electronic databases. Performance of MEDLINE and EMBASE for selected rheumatologic topics
• Identification of true RCTs of the effects of educational interventions on asthma-related outcomes in Medline and Embase using abstracts versus full text
• Identification of unpublished studies contribute to a systematic review on negative pressure wound therapy
• Identification, description, and quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in orthopedics and traumatology journals from Latin America and Spain
• Identifying and assessing study filters in searches for non-randomised intervention studies
• Identifying and assessing the impact of outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis
• Identifying and considering data sovereignty and governance within systematic reviews
  
• Identifying and dealing with participants with missing outcome data in trials: Framework for systematic review authors
• Identifying and filling the gaps in health promotion and public health research
• Identifying and handling retracted studies affecting systematic reviews
  
• Identifying and incorporating adverse effects in systematic reviews
• Identifying and managing nonfinancial conflicts of interest for systematic reviews
• Identifying and prioritising areas for guidance development in public health
• Identifying approaches for including studies published in language other than English in systematic reviews: a descriptive study
• Identifying appropriate source guidelines and recommendations for GRADE-ADOLOPMENT in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa required a fit-for-setting and -capacity approach
• Identifying asthma RCTs with Medline and Embase
• Identifying barriers and facilitators to home safety interventions for the families of pre-school children
• Identifying Candidate Harms for a Systematic Review
• Identifying Cochrane citation classics
• Identifying common statistical errors in Cochrane reviews of interventions
• Identifying commonly used terms in systematic reviews of implementation in healthcare
• Identifying diagnostic studies relevant for primary health care
• Identifying digital intervention research: Using bibliometric analyses to inform searching and mapping
• Identifying effective community-based drug prevention interventions
• Identifying evidence gaps in Chilean health research: A first step towards evidence-informed decision making and strategic research agendas.
• Identifying evidence-based practice teaching strategies in Australasian optometry curricula
• Identifying existing models of public and patient involvement in palliative care research in cancer patients for better health decisions
• Identifying future research priorities in low-and middle-income countries using an Evidence Gap Maps approach: case study of mapping reviews on cataract
• Identifying global priority areas for systematic reviews in Chronic Otitis Media – the importance of stakeholder engagement
• Identifying guideline needs for newborn and child health in South Africa, Malawi and Nigeria: a priority-setting exercise
• Identifying high priority methodological questions for conducting rapid systematic reviews: Preliminary results from an eDelphi study
• Identifying high priority review questions for Africa: Cochrane Africa’s scoping process
• Identifying HIV Prevention Trials for Systematic Review: Comparing Manual and Automated Methods of Retrieval
• Identifying ineffective interventions from Cochrane reviews through the interpretation of the main Summary of Findings table
• Identifying informal recommendations in Chinese clinical practice guidelines: A cross-sectional study
• Identifying information retrieval research for systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses beyond effectiveness reviews: Summarized Research in Information Retrieval (SuRe Info).
• Identifying key mechanisms of effective mental health and psychosocial support programmes: A cross-study synthesis of the findings from qualitative and quantitative evidence
• Identifying methodological challenges in systematic reviews of health policy and systems research in low-and middle-income countries
• Identifying national and sub-national data of maternal cause of death: challenges in epidemiologic searching of bibliographic databases
• Identifying needs, strategies and strategic partnerships to strengthen consumer engagement in Cochrane systematic review processes
• Identifying non-randomised studies in Medline
• Identifying opportunities for increased patient and public involvement in the development of the Academy’s Evidence Analysis Library Nutrition Practice Guidelines
• Identifying optimal characteristics of Cochrane systematic review summary formats: qualitative study and three randomized controlled trials
• Identifying participants with missing outcome data in trials included in systematic reviews: challenges and suggested solutions
• Identifying participants with missing outcome data in trials included in systematic reviews: challenges and suggested solutions
• Identifying patient-important practical issues for shared decision-making
• Identifying predatory journals in systematic reviews
• Identifying predictors of missed studies in the abstract screening process and methods to find missed studies
• Identifying priorities for systematic reviews relevant to Australian health policy makers
• Identifying Priority Health System Questions for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Experiences from the Norwegian satellite of the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group
• Identifying problematic randomised trials using individual participant data
  
• Identifying publication bias in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes in the presence of baseline risk
• Identifying Qualitative Research to complement Cochrane Reviews
• Identifying randomized controlled trials in conference proceedings abstracts
• Identifying randomized controlled trials in the journal Aids
• Identifying randomized controlled trials published in German general health care journals using medline and embase: How useful is the controlled
• Identifying RCTs for Systematic Reviews: An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Clinical Trial Register and Electronic Bibliographic Database Searches
• Identifying RCTs in MEDLINE by publication type and through the Cochrane Strategy: the case in hypertension
• Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Lancet: the contribution of the Cochrane Collaboration
• Identifying research gaps in CAM - Can a Cochrane consumer make a difference?
• Identifying research literature from low and middle income countries
• Identifying resource intensive areas of systematic review production and updating – a scoping review
• Identifying review questions for future Cochrane reviews on groin and ventral hernia surgery: a meta-epidemiological study
• Identifying studies on diagnostic tests in oncology: the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) experience
• Identifying subgroups based on continuous measurements in individual patient data meta-analysis
• Identifying systematic reviews on related topics: can we do more to help readers?
• Identifying the evidence gaps in Cochrane fertility reviews
• Identifying the gaps: Cochrane Reviews on cancer prevention
• Identifying the prevalence and distribution of adverse drug events in children within community settings: a scoping review
• Identifying trials, or possible trials, conducted in low and middle income countries
• Identifying underlying mechanisms between intrinsic and variable prognosticators and clinical outcomes: a structural modelling approach
• Identifying values in the health policy decision-making processes about health system financing in Latin America: a critical interpretive synthesis
• Identifying ways of enhancing effective evidence use in local public-health decision making
• Identifying who benefits most from treatments: How to analyse, present and interpret interactions and subgroup effects in meta-analysis
• Identifying who benefits most from treatments: how to analyse, present and interpret interactions in meta-analysis
• Identifying with the Translator Role: MTI Students’ Translation Practices within the Cochrane Simplified Chinese Project
  
• If a rapid review is the solution, what is the problem?
• If you plan it, will they come? Lessons learned about participant recruitment and retention for Cochrane webinars
• If, when and how to sample primary studies for inclusion in a qualitative evidence synthesis
• IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Igniting minds: Use of Cochrane resources as educational tools for training medical students in developing countries
• Ignoring non-significant factors without data may bias the results of meta-analysis of prognostic studies
• Illuminating review results using systematic evidence mapping
• Illuminating the shadows: a critical examination of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in a scoping review on SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies
• Illustrating Cochrane Reviews with Narrative Clips Describing Patients' Experiences of the Interventions
• Impact and evaluation of research: Perspectives from funders and users of research
• Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review
• Impact evaluation framework for evidence-based e-health projects in Sri Lanka
• Impact evaluation of the Nigerian Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution, 2000-2014
• Impact of a guideline update on recommendations and didactic material: The example of AFAM (African First Aid Materials)
• IMPACT OF A SINGLE REVIEWER ON CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT IN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
• Impact of active placebo controls on estimated drug effects in randomised trials
• Impact of adding data from clinical study reports to a systematic review of adverse events in cancer patients
• Impact of Ambient Heat Exposure on Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
• Impact of an evidence based pediatrics electronic journal
• Impact of an evidence-based care program in a hospital in Brazil
  
• Impact of an upper respiratory infection (URI) clinical guideline on costs and outcomes of care
• Impact of asymmetry of summary ROC curves in meta-analyses comparing diagnostic test accuracy
• Impact of baseline score imbalance on comparative effectiveness reviews
• Impact of behavior change communication and social marketing strategies to improve compliance to IFA supplementation in LMICs: A rapid review
• Impact of climate change on adolescents' health outcomes: an evidence gap map review
  
• Impact of climate change on child outcomes: an Evidence Gap Map review
• Impact of Climate Change on Maternal Health Outcomes: An Evidence Gap Map Review
  
• Impact of clinical recommendations informed by Cochrane diagnostic accuracy reviews for infectious diseases prevalent in low- and middle-income countries
• Impact of Cochrane Corners in Portuguese journals
• Impact of Cochrane reviews on health technology assessments
• Impact of Cochrane systematic reviews of public health interventions for physical activity
• Impact of community animal health services: A systematic review
• IMPACT OF COVID-19 LOCKDOWN ON AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN PORT REGIONS. SCOPING REVIEW
  
• Impact of cut-offs on guideline synopses for the preparation of disease-management programmes
• IMPACT OF DATA EXTRACTION BY A SINGLE REVIEWER ON EFFECT ESTIMATES FROM META-ANALYSES
• Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on malignant tumours among type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis
• Impact of duplicate publication in a meta-analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
• Impact of engagement in guideline development: a systematic review
  
• Impact of excluding non-English studies on network meta-analysis: an empirical study
• Impact of Expectation Bias on Effect Estimates between Non-inferiority and Superiority Randomized Clinical Trials: Retrospective Cohort Study
• Impact of funding source on reporting of adverse effects: methodological overview
• Impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cancer among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Impact of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) on conclusions of dentistry systematic reviews
• Impact of Grey Literature on Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials - A Systematic Review
• Impact of including conference abstracts in systematic reviews: analysis from a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of COVID-19
• Impact of including Korean RCTs in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
• Impact of incretin-based therapies on abdominal pain among people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis