• Living systematic reviews for up-to-date evidence: case studies on pediatric croup and acute gastroenteritis
• Living systematic reviews: a living ‘how to’ guide
• Living Systematic Reviews: discussion of a systems approach to keeping reviews up to date
• Living systematic reviews: practical guidance for author teams
• Local capacity for quality evidence syntheses: methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from Dalhousie University-affiliated reviewers
• Local sealed envelope randomisation in a multicentre trial: a cautionary tale
• Local strategies for disseminating knowledge on evidence: a Cuban project
• LOCATE: A prospective evaluation of the value of Leveraging Ongoing Citation Acquisition Techniques for living Evidence syntheses
• Locating evidence for developing countries: A case study of three public health reviews
• Locating Reports of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions.
• Locating systematic reviews of healthcare interventions in children: an efficient PubMed search strategy
• Location matters in trial quality: African HIV/AIDS trials are more likely to report adequate allocation concealment and random generation compared with North American HIV/AIDS trials
• Logic model as a knowledge translation tool for complex interventions in systematic reviews
• Logic model templates for systematic reviews of complex health interventions
• Logic models – developing a logic model and using it to guide your review
• Long-term harm and memory impairment in electroconvulsive therapy treatment for depression: preliminary results from a systematic review using an integrative methodological approach
• Looking for the evidence: is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?
• Looking to the future evidence infrastructure at NICE: Research surveillance, synthesis and use
• LOST to follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): the potential impact on the estimates of treatment effect
• Low carbohydrate diets and cardiovascular health: an example of a rapid response with high quality reviews to inform public health promotion
• Low energy lasers for treatment Of Tuberculosis
• Low quality corneal disease systematic reviews limit the amount of usable evidence for informing practice guidelines
• Low quality of reporting of primary outcomes in Cochrane abstracts
• Low rate of protocol registration of systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: a meta-epidemiological study
• Low-cost, high-quality guidelines through global partnership working
• Low-dose versus high-dose stavudine for treating people with HIV infection
• Lower is better: an updated meta-regression analysis investigating effects of blood glucose reduction by diabetic drugs with minimal hypoglycemia risk
• Lowering lipids enhances the effect of statins in preventing cardiovascular outcomes
• Lumping versus splitting in systematic reviews: Feasibility for researchers versus relevance for practice and policy?
• Machine learning and automation in reviews is now a reality, but do we yet know how to use these technologies?
• Machine learning methods for motor recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
• Machine learning tools to expedite citation screening and risk of bias appraisal in systematic reviews: evaluations of Abstrackr and RobotReviewer
• Machine-learning assisted screening increases efficiency of systematic review
• MAG-Net-ise it! How the use of Microsoft Academic Graph with machine learning classifiers can revolutionise study identification for systematic reviews
• Magnitude of childhood obesity in India: a systematic review of available evidence
• Magnitude of MDR-TB and its risk factors in Sichuan, a southwest province with high TB burden in China
• Mailuoning injection for the treatment of stroke: integration with the GRADE system
• Maintaining currency in the rapidly evolving world of diabetes research - the living evidence approach
• Maintenance of Exercise and related factors among Older People
• Major and rapid methodological changes: Lessons learned in evidence synthesis and its application in guideline development
• Major health topics in females adolescents addressed by Cochrane systematic reviews: how big is the gap?
• Make evidence-based medicine individualized: synthesizing value-weighted composite endpoints in clinical trials
• Making a Chinese practice guideline of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for infertile women with advanced age
• Making a podcast for a Cochrane Review
• Making a podcast for a Cochrane Review
• Making child health evidence usable to the public: what do parents want?
• Making child health evidence usable to the public: what do parents want?
• Making Cochrane Reviews more clinically accessible: Cochrane Clinical Answers
• Making Cochrane Reviews more clinically accessible: the new Cochrane clinical answers derivative product
• Making Cochrane Reviews more clinically accessible: the new Cochrane clinical answers derivative product
• Making connections: knowledge brokering to bring systematic reviews to public health practice
• Making consumer participation a reality - challenges for cochrane
• Making evidence actionable: the PACK clinical-decision support tool
• Making evidence on health and wellbeing benefits of nature accessible to care-home staff
• Making evidence short, shareable and social
• Making identifying Oral Health Group (OHG) reviews in the Cochrane Library easier and faster
• Making information support systems relevant to decision-makers: an effectiveness systematic review and a framework synthesis
• Making practical sense of a systematic review. The Cochrane Neurological Network and consumer perspectives
• Making research easier to find: improving the discoverability of clinical trial protocols in Wellcome Open Research using Cochrane Linked Data
• Making research make a difference II: disseminating and implementing R&D findings in a health service
• Making results of patient-reported outcomes interpretable
• Making results of patient-reported outcomes interpretable
• Making results of patient-reported outcomes interpretable
• Making results of patient-reported outcomes interpretable
• Making sense of complex interventions: application of hierarchical meta-regression in a meta-analysis of diabetes quality improvement (QI) interventions
• Making sense of complex interventions: evidence synthesis through harvest plots and post-review expert consultations
• Making sense of diagnostic meta-analysis using carotid artery imaging as a template
• Making sense of diverse research evidence: reflections on the use of the interweave synthesis approach to mixed-methods synthesis
• Making sense of scientific evidence and commenting on a Cochrane review from a consumer perspective
• Making sense of scientific evidence: a workshop for consumers
• Making sense of scientific evidence: how consumers can contribute to Cochrane Reviews – Part 1
• Making sense of scientific evidence: how consumers can contribute to Cochrane Reviews – Part 2
• Making sense of umbrella reviews
• Making summary data from systematic reviews interactive – The Systematic Review Data Repository 2.0 (SRDR 2.0)
• Making systematic review data open access – an example with the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Satellite and the Systematic Review Data Repository
• Making systematic reviews impactful through knowledge-translation strategies and tools
• Making systematic reviews relevant to health care professionals
• Making the best use of limited resource: An introduction to health economics in guidelines
• Making the case for investing in public health: Return on investment
• Making the evidence accessible – Improvement of Wikipedia entries by incorporating Cochrane Review results in Haematology
• Making the GRADE approach for network meta-analysis more efficient
• Making the resources of the Cochrane Collaboration 'of, by and for the people': a developing country perspective
• Making the results of Cochrane reviews more accessible and friendly
• Malaysian authors’ perception on the degree of consensus in Cochrane Review development: a preliminary survey
• Malaysian experience of training journalists in understanding research evidence: A Cochrane Geographic Groups Consumer Engagement and Involvement Challenge Fund project
• Management of frequent attenders in primary care
• Management of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
• Management of Vascular Anomalies and Hip Dysplasia in Children According to International Recommendations
• Management strategies for peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori eradication
• Management strategies for peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori eradication
• Managing a very large systematic review of observational studies and randomized trials without compromising on methodological rigor
• Managing high volumes of evidence in systematic reviews: an umbrella review of approaches in Covid-19 vaccine reviews
• Managing overlap in overviews of reviews: a cross-sectional survey of the published literature between 2015 and 2017
• Managing the editorial process: an advanced workshop for Cochrane Review Group Super Users in Phase 2 of the Cochrane Information Management System
• Managing the international websites of The Cochrane Collaboration: selecting the right content management system
• Managing updates: editorial processes
• Manipulating the evidence? - A critical review of review articles on the effectiveness of spinal manipulation
• Manipulating the type, timing and amount of input from reviewers with different expertise to reduce bias in systematic review: a case report
• Manual and electronic search for clinical trials in Brazilian journals on Angiology and Vascular surgery
• Manual Therapy For Neck Disorders
• Many hands make light work—or do they? Results of two pilot studies looking at the effects of crowdsourcing
• Many hands make light work—or do they? Results of two pilot studies looking at the effects of crowdsourcing
• MAPA: a live meta-analysis with customized tables in a live map
• Mapi Research Institute Health-related Quality of Life Database (IQOD) Project.
• Mapping Cochrane systematic reviews: the next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age
• Mapping methods to deal with commonly encountered scenarios in overviews of reviews
• Mapping priority topics for nutrition research
• Mapping research gaps in interventions related to Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5-A (maternal mortality) in the 'Implication for Researchá section of Cochrane reviews
• Mapping Reviews and Evidence Gap Maps: Evidence syntheses for broader health questions
• Mapping Reviews, Scoping Reviews and Evidence and Gap Maps (EGMs) – Same but Different. The ‘Big Picture’ Review Family
• Mapping studies for inclusion in a Cochrane Overview of physical activity
• Mapping systematic review evidence on yoga interventions: what has been done and are there gaps?
• Mapping the clinical guideline gap for forcibly displaced people living in temporary camps
• Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision-making in health care
• Mapping the Cochrane evidence in infectious diseases
• Mapping the Cochrane intervention reviews related to physical activity for chronic noncommunicable disease
• Mapping the Cochrane Library for decision making in Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for prevention and treatment of mental disorders
• Mapping the evidence in neurotrauma: The results of the
• Mapping the Evidence Related to Health and Climate Change Mitigation
• Mapping the evidence: Different approaches to evidence mapping across disciplines
• Mapping the growth of The Cochrane Collaboration in India
• Mapping the knowledge needs of Cochrane Field stakeholders: a gaps analysis
• Mapping the Maps: Methods and Uses of Evidence and Gap Maps.
• Mapping the terrain: searching for cancer systematic reviews for the Cancer Specialist Library
• Mapping trials: the HIV/AIDS trials register leads the way to GIS Mapping
• Mapping tuberculosis treatment intervention trials in Africa
• Maps are for everyone: PPI in systematic evidence maps can have significant benefits for understanding findings, relevance and application
• Marcroeconomic adjustment policies and their effect on health in Kenya
• Masks for preventing COVID-19 infection: a scoping review
• Mass media interventions for promoting HIV testing: challenges of incorporating interrupted time series analysis
• Mass media interventions for smoking prevention and cessation: systematic review for the Korea Preventive Services Task Force
• Massage for pain: an overview of systematic reviews
• Massive production of meta-analyses of antidepressants with industry authorship or industry-related conflicts
• Mastering the art of the plain language summary
• Matching guideline questions to Cochrane Review questions – a linked data test case
• Maternal anaemia and risk of adverse birth and health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis
• MaternaMente: evidence-based active childbirth group support
• Maximizing collaboration between university students and Cochrane
• Maximizing collaboration between university students and the Iberoamerican Cochrane Network (in Spanish)
• Maximizing diversity and minimizing research waste: research prioritization in PenCLAHRC
• Maximizing retrieval of relevant studies: the Potential Source Study Classification System
• Maximizing the potential of data associated with Cochrane reviews: Opportunities and future directions for the new review data package
• Maximizing the Use of the Cochrane library through librarian-clinician partnerships
• Maximizing the value of IPD when meta-analysing randomised trials
• May exogenous gangliosides cause Guillain-Barre syndrome? An opportunity for reviewing Cochrane reviews
• McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) performs well for identifying new studies to be included in updates of Cochrane Collaboration systematic reviews
• Measurement harmonization in individual-participant-data meta-analysis
• Measurement instruments in digital education research: A systematic review of validity evidence and psychometric properties
• Measuring and reporting adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in randomised controlled trials: observations from a Cochrane review
• Measuring and reporting of statistical heterogeneity in reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
• Measuring behaviour change for preventing HIV transmission in schools using cricket games through a randomised-controlled trial in Cameroon
• Measuring behavioural change outcomes in development aid: A call for standardisation to improve the evidence synthesis
• Measuring costs of randomized clinical trials: development of a standardized tool
• Measuring global health inequalities: the Gini, Theil and Slope inequality index for 291 diseases and injuries and 76 risk factors
• Measuring impact of systematic reviews using individual participant data: evidence from clinical guidelines
• Measuring impact, assessing priorities and delivering high-quality timely reviews to improve patient health outcomes
• Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care: A mixed methods systematic review on theories and instruments
• Measuring outcomes in fertility trials - can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates?
• Measuring suicide-related outcomes in children and adolescents who have been prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
• Measuring the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation: direct or indirect measurement of change?
• Measuring the gaps between Cochrane reviews and practice recommendations: the example of cost B13 European guidelines for low-back pain
• Measuring the impact of a laboratory practice guideline on immunohistochemical assay validation: Results from multiple modalities
• Measuring the impact of participating in community-engaged evidence synthesis research
• Measuring the long-term sustainability of an evidence-based innovation programme - dysphagia identification and management in post-stroke patients: A study protocol
• Measuring the patient safety culture in a pharmacy setting in China
• Measuring the quality of end-of-life care: Palliative care of cancer patients
• Measuring update ability of evidence-based practice online point-of-care information services
• Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews. A cross-sectional study
• Mechanisms of implementing public health interventions: a pooled causal mediation analysis of randomised trials
• MECIR standards for Plain Language Summaries: the PLEACS project
• Media awareness and effective dissemination: strategies for seeking out great Cochrane stories and sharing Cochrane evidence with the media
• Media awareness and story content; strategies for seeking out great Cochrane stories and sharing them with the media
• Media training
• Medical Management for Miscarriage
• Medical students learning of reporting guidelines based on the EQUATOR Network
• Medical students’ attitudes towards research education and opportunities during their training: a cross-sectional survey at McMaster University
• Medico-legal issues related to mammographic screening
• Medizin-transparent and MedBusters – evidence-based fact-checking services for the German-speaking lay public
• medrxivr: A new tool for searching for and retrieving records and PDFs from the medRxiv preprint repository
• MeerKat: getting the most out of your study-based Specialized Register
• Meeting diverse learning needs of Cochrane Information Specialists (CIS): survey results on resources and services from the CIS Support Team
• Meeting end-user needs through rapid evidence reviews: a partnership case study
• Meeting the challenge of research empowerment through co-production and expert patient review
• Meeting the challenges of undertaking and communicating complex reviews with ‘messy’ messages: the case of the health effects of mixed income communities
• Men’s perceptions of the physical consequences of a radical prostatectomy on their quality of life: A qualitative systematic review
• Mental health & preterm birth: abstract submission for oral presentation
• Mental health services for serious mental illness: a map of randomized controlled trials
• Mentoring clinicians in conducting systematic reviews through a clinical fellowship program
• Mentoring to make a difference: it takes a village to raise a systematic review (for implementation in policy or practice)
• Mentorship, Community, and Evidence Synthesis Across Borders: Experiences of Cochrane US Year 2 Mentees
• Message Lab – a platform for research and improvement of public health messages
• Meta analysis of continuous covariates in observa­tional studies
• Meta analysis with qualitative synthesis on the effects of self-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes: methodological perspectives on qualitative data in reviews of effects
• Meta-aggregation as a method to synthesise qualitative evidence: history and development
• Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of quality of life outcomes: preliminary results and work in progress
• Meta-analyses for regulatory purposes: the case of esketamine
• Meta-analyses from different sources of information
• Meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic
• Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy
• Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be replicated