Index

Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing 2018 Edinburgh
Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing 2019 Santiago
Preparing Cochrane Reviews for submission, editing and publication: common errors and how to solve them 2023 London
Preparing for submitting your manuscript to the Cochrane’s Central Editorial Service for Peer Review – observations from the Central Editorial Service Quality Assurance Team 2023 London
Preparing medical students for evidence-based medicine ‒ a questionnaire study on education/training in evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Preparing results of different critical appraisal tools for decision-makers—a real-world example 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes measures in meta-analyses: A systematic survey of Cochrane reviews 2020 Abstracts
Presentation for GES 2024 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Presentation of continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: a survey of clinicians’ understanding and preferences 2013 Québec City
Presentation of time-to-event outcomes in GRADE Summary of Finding (SOF) tables: Evaluation of Cochrane Cancer Reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Presenting clinically relevant information on diagnostic performance in systematic reviews: the use of predictive values (PPV and 1-NPV) 2010 Keystone
Presenting evidence and practice: A visual interactive map of review-level evidence and digital interventions for drug/alcohol misuse available in England 2020 Abstracts
Presenting evidence of effectiveness of interventions and more: the evidence of effects page 2015 Vienna
Presenting evidence to professionals and the general population - a qualitative inquiry on recipients’ perception of systematic review summary formats 2019 Santiago
Presenting evidence-based recommendations to patients and the public—what do people want and how should we provide it? 2013 Québec City
Presenting meta-analysis as a typical 2 X 2 table 1997 Amsterdam
Presenting summary information from Cochrane systematic reviews: randomised-controlled trial of infographics vs. standard text-based summaries 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Presenting the results of a Cochrane review to policy makers in a video format 2011 Madrid
Presenting the results of a systematic review to non-experts: the Dissemination Checklist 2023 London
Presidential hotline: A potential tool for evidence-based decision making in the health sector in South Africa 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal 2023 London
Pressure injury prevention in critically Ill Patients at a hospital in Japan: Evidence Implementation Project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevalence and determinants of hypertension in people living with HIV/AIDS in Fako Division, southwest region of Cameroon 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevalence and factors related to positive results of acupuncture randomized trials published in English 2015 Vienna
Prevalence and Nature of Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Published Health Technology Assessment Reports 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevalence and types of 'Risk of bias' assessments across systematic reviews in sports and exercise medicine 2018 Edinburgh
Prevalence of comorbidities in the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 Abstracts
Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms among Postgraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 2020 Abstracts
Prevalence of gift and ghost authors in Cochrane Reviews 2019 Santiago
Prevalence of insurance medicine related outcomes in update reviews of Cochrane’s 2015 priority list 2015 Vienna
Prevalence of personal conflict of interest disclosure in cancer systematic reviews published in high-impact journals or the Cochrane library: A systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Preventing infection from reusable medical equipment 2000 Cape Town
Preventing infections in cancer patients: what influences the guidelines? 2008 Freiburg
Preventing over-diagnosis and over-treatment 2014 Hyderabad
Preventing overdiagnosis—can Cochrane and systematic reviews help? 2013 Québec City
Preventing overdiagnosis: the Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro experience 2018 Edinburgh
Prevention and control of surgical site infection: a best practice implementation project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevention and control of surgical site infection: preliminary results of a best practice implementation project 2023 London
Prevention and treatment of the common cold - The Ari group's contribution to overviews 2000 Cape Town
Prevention Management Of Falls In Elderly Inpatients: A Best Practice Implementation Project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevention of ankle ligament injuries 1997 Amsterdam
Prevention of asthma admissions with steroids 1997 Amsterdam
Prevention of asthma relapse with steroids 1997 Amsterdam
Prevention of fungal morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients 1996 Adelaide
Prevention of heel pressure ulcer among adult patients in orthopaedic wards: An evidence-based implementation project 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications among patients undergoing general surgery in an acute-care hospital: A best-practice implementation project 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with bisphosphonates - a meta-analysis 1997 Amsterdam
Primary outcomes reported in abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov -do they agree? 2011 Madrid
Primary prevention guidelines for mental health in the workplace using digital health technology 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
PRIME-IPD: A systematic method to prepare Individual participant data for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
Primer in systematic reviews and research synthesis: helping people to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews in Africa 2014 Hyderabad
Primer in systematic reviews: enhancing capacity to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Priorities, publication and progress in reviewing treatment for peripheral nerve disorders 2005 Melbourne
Prioritisation for Evidence Aid: choosing systematic reviews for the Evidence Aid database 2013 Québec City
Prioritisation of Cochrane reviews for consumers and the public to promote evidence-based health care 2008 Freiburg
Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences 1997 Amsterdam
Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences 1997 Amsterdam
Prioritisation: how can we meet the Strategy to 2020 target and what does it mean for individual Cochrane Review Groups? 2014 Hyderabad
Prioritising and promoting topics for systematic reviews to address the public health needs of indigenous people 2006 Dublin
Prioritising Cochrane reviews on the prevention and treatment of obesity: a mapping and stakeholder consultation project 2023 London
Prioritising investment in public health: Translating cost-benefit analysis evidence for policy makers 2010 Keystone
Prioritising systematic review topics in public health: A Delphi study with a broad range of stakeholders. 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Prioritising systematic reviews for updating: unlocking the criteria behind Cochrane reviews declared as conclusive 2020 Abstracts
Prioritising the updating of systematic reviews 2008 Freiburg
Prioritising topics for new Cochrane systematic reviews in oral health 2020 Abstracts
Prioritising topics, formulating questions, and selecting outcomes for a World Health Organization nutrition guideline 2023 London
Prioritising whether and when to update Cochrane reviews 2011 Madrid
Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review 2019 Santiago
Prioritization methods in the development and adaptation of health practice guidelines: a systematic survey of published guidance 2020 Abstracts
Prioritization of primary research based on a mixed-methods systematic review 2018 Edinburgh
Prioritization of research questions for evidence syntheses—a hands-on exercise and reflection following a systematic approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prioritizing clinical research together with patients’ associations: early steps from the PartecipaSalute project 2008 Freiburg
Prioritizing questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research 2014 Hyderabad
Prioritizing topics for and adopting/adapting WHO guidance: A critical interpretive synthesis 2020 Abstracts
Priority areas for systematic reviews in chronic otitis media – findings of a systematic-scoping process 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Priority setting distinguishing methodological quality from report quality: assessment example of systematic reviews about non-pharmacological intervention for depression with PRISMA and AMSTAR 2013 Québec City
Priority setting for Cochrane Clinical Answers 2016 Seoul
Priority setting for health coverage decisions: the application of an innovative methodology in the Chilean health system context 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Priority setting for research and practice of child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) based on evidence from Cochrane Reviews 2015 Vienna
Priority setting for review topics in the Cochrane Review Groups. 1999 Rome
Priority setting for reviews and economic analyses at the World Health Organisation 1999 Rome
Priority setting for systematic reviews of interventions for communicable and non-communicable diseases in West Africa: the impact of consumer involvement 2018 Edinburgh
Priority setting for the topic Work Participation: collaboration project between Cochrane Work and Cochrane Insurance Medicine 2020 Abstracts
Priority setting in practice guideline development: a survey of methodological guidance by guideline-producing organizations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Priority Setting in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group 2020 Abstracts
Priority setting in the Swedish stroke guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Priority setting project for open-angle glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma: where we are now? 2014 Hyderabad
Priority Setting within Cochrane Haematology. 2020 Abstracts
Priority-setting for systematic reviews in Nigeria 2009 Singapore
PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of meta-analysis/systematic review in screening test 2012 Auckland
PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist workshop 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
PRISMA extension for systematic reviews of prevalence (PRISMA-Prev): interactive workshop 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
PRISMA for reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts 2012 Auckland
PRISMA in practice: keeping track of the literature search documentation. What are the problems? 2011 Madrid
PRISMA-S: developing a new reporting guideline extension for literature searches 2019 Santiago
Private ambulatory care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of strategies to improve quality 2009 Singapore
PRO-EBP: an attempt to disseminate the culture of evidence-based physiotherapy practice in Poland 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Probability of major depression classification based on different diagnostic interviews: a synthesis of individual participant data meta-analyses 2020 Abstracts
Probability of selecting a treatment to recommend (POST-R): a new measure for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis 2019 Santiago
PROBAST – A risk-of-bias tool for prediction-modelling studies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
PROBAST: a 'Risk of bias' tool for prediction modelling studies 2018 Edinburgh
PROBAST: a risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies 2016 Seoul
PROBAST: a risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies 2015 Vienna
PROBAST: an opportunity to pilot test a new risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies 2013 Québec City
PROBAST: introduction to a new risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies 2014 Hyderabad
PROBAST+AI: assessing quality, risk of bias and applicability of diagnostic and prognostic prediction models based on AI or ML techniques 2023 London
Probiotics in the overweight or obese pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial 2020 Abstracts
Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of evidence based medicine 2010 Keystone
Problems in the Use of Urinalysis results in metanalysis of randomised controlled trials on drug dependence 2000 Cape Town
Problems with Bayesian random effects in network meta-analysis 2015 Vienna
Process and lessons learned during priority setting in three countries in Africa 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Process of identifying National Health Research Priority areas in Ministry of Health, Malaysia through evidence-based practice 2020 Abstracts
Producing and using generic decision aids linked to evidence summaries and guideline recommendations to enhance shared-decision making in clinical consultations 2014 Hyderabad
Producing Cochrane reviews with multi-stakeholder synergic involvement. An experience with treatments for multiple sclerosis 2023 London
Producing evidence to inform policy and decision-making – a discussion about how we improve processes and outcomes for all. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Producing evidence to inform policy and practice: A worked example of two reviews in health and social care 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Producing guidance on the ethical, governance and management of involving patients and community groups as co-applicants, team members and co-researchers in health research. 2020 Abstracts
Producing robust evidence – time to be part of the solution 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Producing the right reviews: a Cochrane approach to priority setting 2018 Edinburgh
Producing Trusted Evidence: Identifying the Challenges and Finding the Solutions 2023 London
Producing useful evidence syntheses for public health decision-making 2014 Hyderabad
Production models for Cochrane Reviews: What works? What are we doing to improve? 2016 Seoul
Production, local adaptation and implementation of practice guidelines using evidence-based approaches: the collaboration between Emilia Romagna Regional Agency and the Italian Cochrane Centre 1998 Baltimore
Production, use, dissemination, and training in Cochrane systematic reviews for patient-centered outcomes and health decision-making in Bangladesh: a scoping review 2018 Edinburgh
Professional improvement for the development of national clinical guidelines: Description of a online learning program 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Professionalisation of health services management mapping and the role of the education sector: scoping review 2020 Abstracts
Profile of Cochrane review authors 2019 Santiago
Profile of overviews published by the Cochrane Library 2013 Québec City
Profile of Public Contributions in the Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Brazilian Health System, in 2023 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prognostic evidence synthesis and equity considerations informed recommendations for higher-risk children with moderate wasting in a WHO guideline 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 Abstracts
Prognostic models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: a systematic review 2015 Vienna
Prognostic significance of TAZExpression in various cancers: a meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
Programme drift or product failure? Learnings from 10 years of efforts to scale up zinc and ORS for the management of acute diarrhoea in children under 5 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Progress in time to update of Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2011 Madrid
Progress of PROSPERO registering systematic reviews 2015 Vienna
Progress toward a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) 2020 Abstracts
Progressing towards core outcomes in gestational diabetes clinical trials and Cochrane Reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Progression of a framework for dissemination and utilization of research evidence for health care policy and practice 2000 Cape Town
Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT): structure of a draft framework 2015 Vienna
Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT): testing the framework in multiple systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Project SEA-ORCHID: South East Asia - Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries 2005 Melbourne
Project TAKE 5—transforming the antecedent ‘know-how’ for evidence synthesis: 5 factors to consider when conducting systematic reviews! 2013 Québec City
Project Transform: Supporting Australian guideline developers to access and use research evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Promises and Pitfalls in Systematic Reviews on Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Pain 1999 Rome
Promote the use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) to improve surgical safety and quality. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Promoting access to Cochrane Collaboration outputs in developing countries: the possible role of post-graduate distance education 2004 Ottawa
Promoting accessibility and adoption of clinical guidances– An overview of the dissemination strategies undertaken by the Agency of Care Effectiveness 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Promoting and evaluating access to the Cochrane Library 2007 Sao Paulo
Promoting and sustaining use of insecticide-treated bednets in a rural community 2004 Ottawa
Promoting collaboration between Cochrane and the James Lind Alliance 2006 Dublin
Promoting continual dialogue through engagement and illustration: a qualitative research project on involvement in generating and critiquing evidence within HTA 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Promoting effective use of the Cochrane library in a developing country: A case study of Nigeria. 2000 Cape Town
Promoting evidence-based decision making among hospital managers in Cameroon 2014 Hyderabad
Promoting evidence-based health care 1995 Oslo
Promoting Evidence-Based Health Care in Canada: The Canadian Cochrane Network and Centre 1999 Rome
Promoting evidence-based healthcare in South Asia and other low and middle income countries: an attempt to formulate a reliable framework 2012 Auckland
Promoting evidence-informed decision making: a case of mentoring in one health unit 2009 Singapore
Promoting health literacy through community based peer support: a worked example of innovative methods in integrating qualitative and quantitative research in evidence synthesis 2013 Québec City
Promoting informed health decisions based on scientific data for non-professionals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Promoting research and evidence synthesis in internal medicine resident academic projects 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Promoting research transparency - Interventions to improve the publication and dissemination of trial evidence: A scoping review 2023 London
Promoting research-informed decisions on maternal and child health: The SUPPORT Collaboration 2007 Sao Paulo
Promoting the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews in dental practice through Live Webinars : Unveiling the Experiences 2023 London
Promoting the rigorous development of clinical guidelines through the creation of a common appraisal 1997 Amsterdam
Promoting the rigorous development of clinical guidelines through the creation of a common appraisal 1997 Amsterdam
Promoting trial registration and protocol publication - perspectives from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2004 Ottawa
Promoting uptake: using the web to disseminate reviews to parents and public health decision makers 2005 Melbourne
Promotion and prioritisation: Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group’s 20th anniversary project 2016 Seoul
Promotion of evidence-based guidelines – a collaboration on statutory basis between German scientific medical societies, self-administration body and health ministry 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Proof of value decisions from proof of concept data: A review of Canadian formulary review recommendations 2011 Madrid
Prophylactic management of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour: an overview of reviews 2016 Seoul
Prophylaxis using heparin, low molecular weight heparin and phsyical methods against venous thrombosis in hip fracture surgery 1997 Amsterdam
Proposal for a standard protocol for systematic reviews of treatment for back pain 1997 Amsterdam
Proposal to establish a Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Trials Register 2013 Québec City
Proposal to improve the ‘implications for research’ section of Cochrane Reviews 2013 Québec City
Proposals for guideline development groups "Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and Assessment of Quality Improvement of Medical Care" in Japan 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Proposed Framework for Unifying Disease Definitions: An Essential Step before Guideline Development. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Proposed methodology for adaptation of clinical guidelines for national application in Peru 2007 Sao Paulo
Proposed reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Proposing an alternative GRADE evidence table to present the certainty of evidence of indirect comparisons 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Prospective collaborative meta-analysis of trials of weight management interventions in childhood overweight and obesity 2005 Melbourne
Prospective trial registration in the Research Integrity Assessment (RIA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 2023 London
Prospective Trial Registration: Cochrane Renal Group experience 2007 Sao Paulo
Prospective use of network meta-analysis using formal statistical monitoring 2015 Vienna
PROSPERO: An international prospective register of systematic review protocols 2011 Madrid
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry 2019 Santiago
Providing evidence to the WHO, the experience of Cochrane Rehabilitation regarding the Rehabilitation 2030 initiative and the COVID-19 pandemic 2023 London
Providing public access to health evidence through Wikipedia 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Providing time out through dedicated fellowships: strategy to improve Cochrane author support towards review completion 2015 Vienna
Proving clinical relevance of effects in meta-analyses of binary data 2015 Vienna
Pseudo-trials: a method to explore the effect model 1998 Baltimore
PsiTri - A Survey of the State of the Mental Health Trials 2002 Stavanger
Psoriatic arthritis: a quantitative overview of therapeutic options 1996 Adelaide
Psychiatric adverse events in oseltamivir prophylaxis trials: novel comparative analysis using data obtained from clinical study reports 2018 Edinburgh
Psychological management of procedure-related pain and distress in children 2004 Ottawa
Psychological tailoring of interventions to improve the implementation of guidelines: the case of infection prevention and control in German hospitals 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Psychometric evidence for outcome measures used in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review 2015 Vienna
Psychometric evidence for outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review 2015 Vienna
Psychosocial consequences of communicating results of non-invasive prenatal testing to parents: an evidence map 2018 Edinburgh
Psychosocial implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review 2005 Melbourne
Psychosocial interventions for children exposed to traumatic events in low- and middle-income countries: an individual patient data meta-analysis 2014 Hyderabad
Psychosocial interventions preventing gang-related crime among children and young adults 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Psychosocial, Pharmacological, and Legal Interventions for Improving the Psychosocial Outcomes of Children with Substance Misusing Parents 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) bench to bedside: developing a PPI model across multiple areas of research 2018 Edinburgh
Public and patient involvement in the HTA decision-making process in Kazakhstan 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Public health evidence synthesis – existing challenges, inadequacy of existing methods and opportunities: A narrative systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Public perceptions of health risk management in China: A cross-sectional survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Public Private Partnerships - for improving maternal and neonatal health service delivery 2014 Hyderabad
Public-Private Partnerships in Primary Healthcare 2020 Abstracts
Publication and appraisal of methodological guidelines: the development of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials by the Department of Science and Technology of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (DECIT/MOH) 2013 Québec City
Publication bias - a cross-sectional study of randomised trials in Sub-saharan Africa: ongoing challenges of research waste 2023 London
Publication bias and diagnostic research: full publication of results initially presented in abstracts 2006 Dublin
Publication bias and heterogeneity in systematic reviews of newer pharmacotherapies for the treatment of depression 2000 Cape Town
Publication bias and meta-analysis: A practical example 2000 Cape Town
Publication bias and the human albumin review 2000 Cape Town
Publication bias in clinical trials on monoclonal antibodies: a cross-sectional study 2013 Québec City
Publication bias in post-graduate medical education dissertations in India 2014 Hyderabad
Publication bias in randomised trials of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder 2013 Québec City
Publication bias in statistical overview of trials: example of psychological rehabilitation following myocardial infarction 1997 Amsterdam
Publication bias in the field of subfertility 2015 Vienna
Publication bias is a serious threat to the validity of Cochrane reviews 2000 Cape Town
Publication bias tests for survival data: a simulation study 2014 Hyderabad
Publication bias: is it also present in the secondary literature? 2005 Melbourne
Publication ethics and Cochrane reviews 2008 Freiburg
Publication of clinical studies in German general health care journals 1996 Adelaide
Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Approved New Drug Applications in the United States 2007 Sao Paulo
Publication of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials: preliminary evidence of bias 2008 Freiburg
Publication of IPD meta-analyses in Potential barriers andopportunities 2011 Madrid
Publication of responses to a Cochrane systematic review on mass media interventions for HIV testing 2007 Sao Paulo
Publication of Reviews Synthesizing Child Health Evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to determine factors associated with publication venue 2015 Vienna
Publication rate and characteristics of trials registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register 2018 Edinburgh
Publicity of data as an ethical obligation to patients and society 1999 Rome
Publicly funded research in New Zealand: Is the money being well spent? 2020 Abstracts
Publicly-available data from more than 130 systematic reviews containing more than 13,000 studies – The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) 2019 Santiago
Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): recommendations from editors and reviewers 2023 London
Publishing overviews in the cochrane library 2000 Cape Town
PubMed Similar Articles as search method in rapid reviews 2019 Santiago
Purchasers and cost-effectiveness of interventions: are secondary economic evaluations possible? 1994 Hamilton
Purity or pragmatism: how does systematic review methodology from health care translate to the field of development? 2011 Madrid
Purposive sampling within population groups for qualitative evidence syntheses: methodological lessons from building on previous sampling experiences 2018 Edinburgh
Purposively sampling for qualitative evidence syntheses: Methodological lessons from a synthesis on vaccination communication 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Putting Africa first: supporting novice authors of HIV/AIDS reviews in Africa 2005 Melbourne
Putting evidence at the centre of everyday life 2023 London
Putting evidence into practice: development and content of a critical care pathway (CCP) for fractured neck of femur (FNOF) 1996 Adelaide
Putting the issues on the table: summarising outcomes from reviews of reviews to inform health policy 2013 Québec City
Putting the puzzle pieces together: lessons learnt in managing associated trial records in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Putting the puzzle together: Accessing raw quality-of-life data from clinical study reports for use in evidence synthesis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
QUADAS-2: an updated quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies 2011 Madrid
QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies 2020 Abstracts
QUADAS: early experience with a new methodological scoring tool for diagnostic meta-analyses 2005 Melbourne
Qualitative evidence synthesis by storyboarding and storytelling: Treatment adherence 2023 London
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Workshop (CLOSED SESSION) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Qualitative evidence synthesis: methods for integration with effectiveness reviews 2019 Santiago
Qualitative evidence synthesis: three different approaches to using framework synthesis within healthcare research 2019 Santiago
Qualitative meta-analyses: improvement of markers for validity and precision 1994 Hamilton
Qualitative synthesis with meta-aggregation: A practicum 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Qualitative/quantitative descriptors of risk and benefit of hormone replacement therapy 1998 Baltimore
Quality analysis of literatures on clinical randomized controlled trial of pre-eclampsia treated with TCM 2005 Melbourne
Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials on Chinese medicinal herbs for unstable angina pectoris 2005 Melbourne
Quality and feasibility of guideline adaptation by general practice trainees 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality and quantity of cancer-related systematic reviews published in high-impact journals 2016 Seoul
Quality Appraisal of Chinese Rapid Guidelines 2020 Abstracts
Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines and consensus statements on computed tomography for coronary artery disease 2013 Québec City
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements on nursing in China 2012 Auckland
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes: a protocol for AGREEII-based living systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on glioma 2013 Québec City
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic liver cancer: a systematic review 2013 Québec City
Quality Appraisal of Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed in Taiwan 2023 London
Quality appraisal of prevalence studies: a systematic review of tools with classification of their components 2019 Santiago
Quality appraisal of studies on prognostic and diagnostic risk models: a systematic review 2010 Keystone
Quality Appraisal Tools for Primary Studies in Human Health: A meta-epidemiological survey 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality Assessment in Cochrane Reviews : Do We Practice What W0e Preach? 2002 Stavanger
Quality assessment in studies of all non-randomised designs: example from a Cochrane Review of surgery for epilepsy 2014 Hyderabad
Quality assessment in systematic reviews of prognosis: descriptive analysis, development and testing of new recommendations 2005 Melbourne
Quality assessment of Chinese clinical guidelines in 2015 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease 2019 Santiago
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of psoriasis 2019 Santiago
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40 49 years 2010 Keystone
Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies after a modified version of QUADAS-2 in ophthalmological research 2015 Vienna
Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies using QUADAS-2 2023 London
Quality Assessment of Evidence-Based Checklists Identifying Predatory Journals and Comparison of Checklist Items against a Consensus Definition 2020 Abstracts
Quality assessment of included studies in systematic reviews/meta-analysis based on individual patient data: a cross-sectional analysis 2015 Vienna
Quality assessment of machine learning papers: development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of machine learning papers 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality assessment of oral health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in children and adolescents 2015 Vienna
Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies (QUAPAS): an extension of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool for systematic reviews of prognostic test accuracy studies 2019 Santiago
Quality assessment of randomized trials 2006 Dublin
Quality assessment of screening studies using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool 2006 Dublin
Quality assessment of studies for double-reading (DR) of screening mammograms and breast-ultrasound (BU) after negative screening-mammogram: contribution of the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool 2008 Freiburg
Quality assessment of trials found within the scope of Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis (CCDAN) 1998 Baltimore
Quality assessment of trials found within the scope of Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Group 1997 Amsterdam
Quality assessment tool for the methodology of policy brief for health 2019 Santiago
Quality assessment tools for published animal studies 2012 Auckland
Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials: an evaluation by the Chalmers versus the Jadad method 1995 Oslo
Quality assurance of Cochrane systematic review abstracts; a comparison with abstracts published in evidence-based medicine 1998 Baltimore
Quality control of computer databases: a study into the efficiency of electronic searches for randomized trials 1995 Oslo
Quality Evaluation and Reporting Specification for Real-World Evidence of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2023 London
Quality evaluation indicators of health services in China’s Village clinics: a systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality evaluation of a Cochrane Plain language summary using the DISCERN tool: cross-sectional study 2018 Edinburgh
Quality evaluation or existing issues of current systematic review of disease burden 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality improvement and evidence-based decision making on problems of communication with patients and their families in hospitals 2005 Melbourne
Quality improvement in parent-child reviews 1997 Amsterdam
Quality improvement in the care of depressive disorders: transfer of evaluated quality management practice tools into routine 2008 Freiburg
Quality Improvement Kit for Hospitals: Promoting Structural Change to Support Guideline Implementation 1999 Rome
Quality in reporting adverse events and the PRISMA Harms Extension 2013 Québec City
Quality indicators of long-term care for older adults with dementia in integrated medical and nursing care institutions: A systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality measures of included studies for Cochrane reviews - beyond randomization and blinding 2006 Dublin
Quality of Brazilian Ministry of Health clinical practice guidelines: How can we improve? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of clinical heterogeneity investigations in systematic reviews: an assessment of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
Quality of clinical research: a systematic review of definitions and development of a comprehensive framework of indicators 2015 Vienna
Quality of Cochrane systematic review abstracts; readability and comparison with handbook guidelines 1998 Baltimore
Quality of descriptions of rehabilitation interventions in low back pain: a review of published randomized controlled trials 2014 Hyderabad
Quality of evidence for bias from attributes of study design 2012 Auckland
Quality of evidence gap between adult and paediatric guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
Quality of evidence in main comparisons of Cochrane intervention reviews 2019 Santiago
Quality of evidence informing clinical guidelines on treatment of opioid dependence 2008 Freiburg
Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals? 2019 Santiago
Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals? 2020 Abstracts
Quality of evidence: are Cochrane review authors speaking the same language? 2012 Auckland
Quality of guideline recommendations about physical activity and exercise to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and critical appraisal 2020 Abstracts
Quality of health information in Web 2.0 2009 Singapore
Quality of healthcare provided in a task-shifting health system: Experience from a mobile health service in a southern African country 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Thai healthcare journals 2015 Vienna
Quality of Randomised Clinical Trials Affects Estimates of Intervention Efficacy 1999 Rome
Quality of randomised controlled trials included in meta-analyses: how often and how is it assessed? 1996 Adelaide
Quality of report of the clinical quantitative research by area of investigation on the Revista Médica de Chile between years 2017-2021 2023 London
Quality of reporting and adherence to the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 for degradable metal research in animal models of bone fracture 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of reporting and of methods in studies on treatment of ulcers caused by nerve damage in leprosy 2007 Sao Paulo
Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A survey of three clinical specialities 2020 Abstracts
Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices 2020 Abstracts
Quality of reporting of clinical prediction model studies: adherence to TRIPOD 2015 Vienna
Quality of reporting of clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine for vascular dementia 2009 Singapore
Quality of reporting of cost-effectiveness studies in Brazilian health public system: a meta-epidemiological study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies 2004 Ottawa
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in medical laboratory journals 2015 Vienna
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and its affect on estimates of intervention effectiveness 2004 Ottawa
Quality of reporting of trials abstracts needs to be improved: a survey of four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine 2010 Keystone
Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: what authors, reviewers and consumers should consider 2018 Edinburgh
Quality of statistical methods reported in randomised-controlled trials of type-2 diabetes (T2DM) published in 2016 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of studies published as systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in cancer prevention – a systematic methodological survey 2019 Santiago
Quality of studies published as systematic reviews or meta-analyses in Polish journals listed on Thomson Reuters Master Journal List 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes identified within a systematic review on low-dose rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer 2011 Madrid
Quality of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy on Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias 2013 Québec City
Quality of systematic reviews of the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group: can we improve it? 2006 Dublin
Quality of systematic reviews used to build guidelines on prevention and treatment of breast and colorectal cancers 2005 Melbourne
Quality of the reporting of Brazilian Ministry of Health updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGU) versions: Applying checkUP 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality of the reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary interventions 2007 Sao Paulo
Quality of the systematic reviews of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis Group 2006 Dublin
Quality of trials of life-style interventions underpinning two national clinical guidelines 2006 Dublin
Quality of warfarin control and the risk of stroke, bleeding and mortality in patients with atrial ﬁbrillation 2016 Seoul
Quality Predictors of Randomised Clinical Trials Published in the 'Hepatology' Journal 1999 Rome
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality scoring of diagnostic articles for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quality scoring of randomized controlled trials for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines 2016 Seoul
Quantification of bias in the results of non-randomised studies compared with randomised studies 2008 Freiburg
Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health 2013 Québec City
Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analyses 1997 Amsterdam
Quantifying how diagnostic test accuracy depends on threshold in a meta-analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quantifying the evidence gap in stroke rehabilitation 2004 Ottawa
Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics 2011 Madrid
Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as patient input in a health-technology assessment on Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for inclusion in a mixed studies review: an update of the quantitizing proposition 2019 Santiago
Quantity and Quality of Health Economics Literature in Health Technology Assessment. 1999 Rome
Quasi-randomisation in emergency setting trials: a recipe for selection bias, or an efficient approach? 2015 Vienna
Quaternary prevention - the role of Point-of-Care tools 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Question CF: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in cystic fibrosis shared decision making 2018 Edinburgh
Question formulation and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews: Accuracy and beyond 2023 London
Questionable Beauty Of Prevention - Case Of Overweight Prevention 1999 Rome
Questionable early stopping: Case study of supplemental perioperative oxygen and the incidence of surgical site infection 2011 Madrid
Questioning the methodological superiority of ‘placebo’ over ‘active’ controlled trials 2009 Singapore
Quick and messy: Rapid review methods for public health, social sciences, and non-clinical evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Quick on the draw: producing a sound evidence base to a tight time scale 1997 Amsterdam
R for Evidence Synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
R Hands-on: Upskilling Workshop on Using R and Shiny Apps for Information Retrieval Tasks 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Racial Health Equity Definitions and Terminologies in Prominent Public Health Websites: A Systematic Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Raising awareness about the Cochrane Collaboration and South African Cochrane Centre in Ethiopia 2010 Keystone
Random reflections on Archie Cochrane 2004 Ottawa
Random-effects meta-analyses should be optimal - not traditional 2007 Sao Paulo
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials 2010 Keystone
Randomised and controlled clinical trials in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register and their inclusion in Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group systematic reviews 2010 Keystone
Randomised clinical trials on acupuncture in the Korean literature: bibliometric analysis and methodological quality 2014 Hyderabad
Randomised clinical trials with negative results: Is there an increase in their reporting? 2013 Québec City
Randomised clinical trials: advantages and limitations of using parallel-group design or cross-over designs in the field of methylphenidate for ADHD 2016 Seoul
Randomised controlled trials in nephrology: are more and better needed? 2000 Cape Town
Randomised controlled trials of surgical procedures in children: a cross-sectional study 2012 Auckland
Randomised-controlled trials are particularly scarce and underpowered in the setting of rare diseases: Further acquisition of knowledge is needed 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Randomized clinical trials of the impact of alternative diagnostic strategies on patient-important outcomes: a systematic survey 2015 Vienna
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for policy interventions? A review of reviews and meta-regression 2006 Dublin
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in certain collagen vascular diseases 1996 Adelaide
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rehabilitation research 2018 Edinburgh
Randomized Controlled Trials in "Chinese Journal of Digestion " - A Handsearching of 1981-1998 1999 Rome
Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases" - a handsearching of 1983~1997 1998 Baltimore
Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases" between 1991 and 1999 2000 Cape Town
Randomized controlled trials in the leading Chinese internal medical journals 1998 Baltimore
Randomized controlled trials of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment in Africa: results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register 2009 Singapore
Randomized controlled trials relevant to viral hepatitis in the Chinese literature 1998 Baltimore
Randomized trials of neurosurgical interventions: a systematic appraisal 2004 Ottawa
Randomized Trials Versus Observational Studies in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention 1999 Rome
Rank‐Heat Plot: An R Shiny tool for presenting multiple network meta-analysis outcomes 2023 London
Ranking of evidence in network meta-analysis results in misleading conclusion - a case study 2019 Santiago
Ranking of Evidence in Network Meta-Analysis Results in Misleading Conclusion -A Case Study. 2020 Abstracts
Ranking Outcome Variables and Comparing the Design of Eligible Studies with Current Standard of Care: Two Steps Towards Assessing Relevance of Existing Research 1999 Rome
Ranking research methodology by risk—a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Ranking the relative importance of health-related outcomes for periodic health examinations - a comparison of citizens and medical experts 2018 Edinburgh
Rapid Cochrane reviews: ‘live testing’ of the concept in a Cochrane Review Group and observations on rapid editorial processes 2009 Singapore
Rapid evidence identification in reviews of post-COVID syndrome: inclusion of preprint sources and timeliness of review completion 2023 London
Rapid evidence reviews: the CADTH experience 2013 Québec City
Rapid evidence synthesis for COVID-19 international guidance: a World Health Organization commissioned Cochrane rapid scoping review 2023 London
Rapid needs appraisal to inform outbreak response research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid network meta-analysis (NMA) using “Plan-Do-study-Act” to prioritise interventions for a platform trial to prevent atrial fibrillation after heart surgery 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid production of a series of evidence reviews for a Dutch policy maker: highlights from the obstructive sleep apnea comorbidities initiative 2019 Santiago
Rapid qualitative reviews (RQRs): what, why, how and where next? 2018 Edinburgh
Rapid recommendations for screening for early detection of prostate cancer 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid recommendations in reflection of the National Institute for Quality and Excellence in Healthcare (NIKEZ) agenda 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid Response Evidence Service in the Brazilian Federal Government: from policy problems to evidence informed solutions 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid review definition and methods: two scoping reviews 2019 Santiago
Rapid review methods: a systematic scoping review 2020 Abstracts
Rapid review on child food insecurity: challenges encountered 2019 Santiago
Rapid review on the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers caring for patients with filovirus disease 2015 Vienna
Rapid review programs and methods research: description and discussion of the experiences from among Convenors of the Cochrane Methods Rapid Reviews Group 2016 Seoul
Rapid review programs to support healthcare and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods 2015 Vienna
Rapid review report on early COVID-19 status in Republic of Korea and global pandemic 2020 Abstracts
Rapid Review workshop: timely evidence synthesis for decision makers 2015 Vienna
Rapid reviews can increase use of evidence by health system decision-makers’ with fast-paced needs: the VA ESP experience 2015 Vienna
Rapid reviews in rapid learning health systems 2020 Abstracts
Rapid reviews of healthcare interventions (2018-2019): A scoping review 2020 Abstracts
Rapid reviews to inform Ebola preparedness efforts at hospitals 2015 Vienna
Rapid reviews to inform health policy decisions using Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2013 Québec City
Rapid reviews to inform state health policy decisions 2015 Vienna
Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid reviews workshop: developing timely evidence summaries for decision makers 2016 Seoul
Rapid reviews, how much do they comply with Cochrane recommendations in their methodology to provide reliable evidence? 2023 London
Rapid reviews: appropriateness and applicability 2015 Vienna
Rapid reviews: one size fits all? 2013 Québec City
Rapid Synthesis for health policies: Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents. 2020 Abstracts
Rapid-review process to identify priorities for updating published guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Rapid, rapid, rapid…how reliable is a single screener? A crowd-based, randomized methods study (Part 1) 2019 Santiago
Rapid, rapid, rapid…how reliable is a single screener? A crowd-based, randomized methods study (Part 2) 2019 Santiago
RAPID: a web-based application for Rapid, efficient, and Accurate automatic generation of submission rePortIng checklists based on large language moDels 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rare Diseases Clinical Practice Guidelines developed in the context of the Brazilian Public Health System in twelve years. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rasch analysis of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire for women with breast cancer 2018 Edinburgh
Rate and time to the publication of Latin American systematic reviews indexed in PROSPERO: A meta-epidemiological study. 2023 London
Rates per woman versus rates per cycle: The importance of relevant outcome measures in subfertility. 2000 Cape Town
Rating quality of evidence using Cochrane/GRADE approach: sub-group analysis 2009 Singapore
Rating the methodological quality of randomised controlled trials 1995 Oslo
Rating the quality of evidence in Cochrane network meta-analysis: a cross-sectional study 2019 Santiago
Rating the quality of evidence using GRADE approach 2016 Seoul
Rating the quality of the evidence for the studies that evaluate the importance of the outcomes of interest 2014 Hyderabad
Ratio of geometric means to analyze continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: comparison to mean differences and ratio of (arithmetic) means using empiric data and simulation 2010 Keystone
Ratio of means as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study 2007 Sao Paulo
Rationale for the development of Cochrane Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2016 Seoul
Rationale for the preparation of a vaccines library 2004 Ottawa
Rationale for writing a teaching book on elemental skills for critically reading biomedical literature for low- and medium-income countries 2019 Santiago
Rayyan: a systematic reviews web app for exploring and filtering searches for eligible studies for Cochrane Reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Rayyan: from Hyderabad to Seoul 2016 Seoul
RCT databases - reducing research wastage from the systematic review process 2013 Québec City
RCT Rehabilitation Checklist - RCTRACK: Project for a reporting guideline for RCTs in rehabilitation 2020 Abstracts
RCTs for policy interventions? A review of reviews 2005 Melbourne
Re use of extracted data – an ontology-based approach 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Re-analysing equity in a Cochrane review: Smoking cessation in pregnancy 2011 Madrid
Re-analysis of meta-analyses in Cochrane reviews using robust statistical methods 2011 Madrid
Re-assessing and revising 'levels of evidence' in the critical appraisal process 2005 Melbourne
Re-strategizing evidence to policy translation for accelerated utilization of evidence by healthcare consumers in India 2018 Edinburgh
Reaching certainty: a descriptive study of ‘stable’ Cochrane Reviews and coming to firm conclusions 2013 Québec City
Reaching people with direct experience of epilepsy to prioritise topics for Cochrane Systematic Reviews: discussion of approach, results and impact on Review Group work plans 2019 Santiago
Reaching the end users through effective and safe patient-centred health care - what CCNet can provide 2008 Freiburg
READ-It project: catalysing influential nutrition evidence synthesis and capacity building in LMICs 2023 London
Readability assessment of plain language summaries in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews 2018 Edinburgh
Readability of Cochrane Breast Cancer Group plain language summaries 2013 Québec City
Readability of different formats of information about Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Readability, linguistic characteristics and conclusiveness of Cochrane plain language summaries: a cross-sectional study 2020 Abstracts
Readiness of Parliaments to engage with the Sustainable Development Goals: Implementability of the Inter-Parliamentary Union's Self-Assessment Toolkit 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Real World Study: Bridging the Gap Between Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Decision Making 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Real-world effectiveness of long-acting injections for reducing recurrent hospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia 2019 Santiago
Realist review and synthesis of policy intervention studies aimed at reducing exposures to environmental hazards 2016 Seoul
Realist review: an introductory workshop 2013 Québec City
Realities of practice: engaging parents and general practitioners in developing clinical practice guidelines 1998 Baltimore
Reappraisal of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research: updating the STARD guideline 2005 Melbourne
Reasons for disagreements in 'Risk of bias' assessment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in more than one Cochrane review 2018 Edinburgh
Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study 2023 London
Reasons for Randomized Controlled Trial Retraction and their impact on Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-sectional Study 2020 Abstracts
Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots 2008 Freiburg
Recent clinical practice guidelines on hypertension management do not refer to relevant Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
Recent methods in meta-analysis: a case study of synthesis of evidence on emerging health technologies 2006 Dublin
Reclassifying reviews on the basis of recommendation and results: steps towards a user friendly interface 2012 Auckland
Recognising delirium in hospitalised children: A systematic review of risk factors and characteristics of acute paediatric delirium 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Recommendation for axillary lymph node dissection in women with early breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A systematic review of randomised-controlled trials using the GRADE system 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: A methodological review 2010 Keystone
Recommendations for the development, piloting and use of data extraction sheets in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance 2020 Abstracts
Recommendations for the implementation of evidence-based medicine in hospitals based on an overview of reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Recommendations for the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Recommendations for updates to the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias assessment tool, based on an evaluation of its initial implementation 2010 Keystone
Recommendations mapping of complementary and alternative medicine for cancer pain management in clinical practice guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Recommendations to keep a living systematic review alive during a pandemic 2023 London
Reconceptualising searching and screening: How new technologies might change the way in which we identify studies 2011 Madrid
Reconciliation of guidance documents and prioritization of questions for a World Health Organization guideline 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Recovery after gynecological tumor surgery: A scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Rede NATJus: a blog providing content on EBM and HTA for professionals involved with judicialisation on healthcare in Brazil 2020 Abstracts
Redesigning the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for identifying RCTs in MEDLINE using statistical analysis to improve sensitivity and precision 2004 Ottawa
Reduce and recycle: Examining relevant, existing synthesised evidence to avoid research waste and refine the preparation of new systematic reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]