• Comparing prevention efficacy of acute mountain sickness between different medicines: a network meta-analysis
• Comparing preventive strategies in hypertension: risk prediction or blood pressure level? Insight from a meta-analysis based on individual patient data
• Comparing quality assessments of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in nutrition using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: Betwixt and between
• Comparing recommendations in two national guidelines on dementia using the same scientific evidence
• Comparing risk of bias between prospectively and retrospectively registered trials in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)
• Comparing the Impact of the Cochrane library in Web of Science and Scopus
• Comparing the performance of three tools for semi-automated abstract screening when conducting systematic reviews: Abstrackr, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst
• Comparing the practice of study classification and study inclusion in different systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
• Comparing user preferences and understanding for two formats of evidence profiles. A randomized trial
• Comparing various approaches for network meta-analysis regarding effect estimation and evaluation of inconsistency
• Comparison between Autocad and Draftsight in data extraction
• Comparison between randomized clinical trials designating an outcome as primary and those designating the same outcome as secondary
• Comparison of several systematic review process software tools among health care professionals: A questionnaire based survey.
• Comparison of acute and chronic airway diseases in the Cochrane Library: implications for clinicians and researchers
• Comparison of adverse effects data derived from different study designs
• Comparison of alternative evidence summary and presentation formats in clinical guideline development: a mixed-method study
• Comparison of AMSTAR 2 with ROBIS in systematic reviews including randomized and non-randomized studies
• Comparison of clinical practice guidelines between western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine on 18 diseases in China: an evidence-based literature review
• Comparison of conference abstracts and full-text articles of randomized controlled trials in the field of pain: reporting quality and agreement in results
• Comparison of Copas selection model for publication bias and trimand-fill
• Comparison of current and previous approaches to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews
• Comparison of descriptions of blinding in trial protocols and the published reports
• Comparison of diagnostic test accuracy estimates using the Multiple Thresholds Model based on complete and published cut-off data with a bimodal reporting pattern
• Comparison of different MEDLINE search engines
• Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study of COVID-19 trials
• Comparison of evidence-based answer retrieval from four bedside information sources: a randomized controlled trial
• Comparison of four methods for meta-analysis of survival data
• Comparison of holding chambers and nebulisers for beta-agonists in acute asthma, (a systematic review)
• Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health related interventions
• Comparison of linguistic characteristics of plain language summaries of systematic reviews between medical and non-medical sciences: a cross-sectional study
• Comparison of Medline and Embase retrieval of RCTs of the effects of educational interventions on asthma-related outcomes
• Comparison of methods of grading bodies of evidence and strength of recommendations used by clinical practice guideline groups
• Comparison of methods of handling missing data in individual patient data meta-analyses; an empirical example on antibiotics in children with acute otitis media
• Comparison of methods to evaluate the quality of evidence in resource studies: a pilot study
• Comparison of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes to aid decision making
• Comparison of Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) as risk of bias assessment tools for cohort studies
• Comparison of NNT statistics, impact numbers and epidemiological effect measures
• Comparison of outcome reporting in clinical study reports, journal publications and registry reports in the field of telecardiology
• Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes specified in registry entries with journal publications
• Comparison of protocols to published articles for randomised controlled trials
• Comparison of RCTs and observational studies: implications for benefit assessment in health care and health policy decision-making in light of effect size, PICO and certainty of evidence
• Comparison of results from different imputation techniques of missing data in an anti-obesity drug trial
• Comparison of RIGHT and AGREE reporting checklists for healthcare practice guidelines
• Comparison of selection models in meta-analysis
• Comparison of single versus double data extraction: a pilot study
• Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study
• Comparison of statistical tests on bias in meta-analysis with binary outcome
• Comparison of tap water and saline for wound cleansing: an overview of systematic reviews
• Comparison of test performance of liquid-based versus conventional Pap smears to detect cervical cancer precursors
• Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist and Newcastle Ottawa Scale as risk-of-bias tools
• Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics updated Quality Criteria Checklist and Cochrane's ROB 2.0 as risk of bias tools
• Comparison of the attention of reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in recent seven years
• Comparison of the attention of trial registration in selective countries in the Asia-Pacific region
• Comparison of the attention paid to reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in the last three years
• Comparison of the attention paid to trial registration in the Asia-Pacific region in the last three years
• Comparison of the Cochrane Neonatal Group systematic reviews and Danish guidelines for newborns
• Comparison of the diagnostic criteria and efficacy evaluation criteria in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese herbal medicine
• Comparison of the methodological quality of RCTs using RoB-2 and JBI tools: performing of medical students
• Comparison of the priority action areas in oral health with the evidence available in The Cochrane Library
• Comparison of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies in the Assessment of Hormone Replacement Therapy
• Comparison of the tests of homogeneity based on odds ratio and risk difference for interaction
• Comparison of trends in study designs types in LILACS and PubMed in the last decade
• Comparison of two different search strategies in identifying literature for a diagnostic test accuracy review of Down's Syndrome screening
• Comparison of two experiences of development of healthcare quality indicators
• Competencies needed for patient involvement in patient-oriented research: report of a scoping review of the literature
• Competency profiles for Evidence-Informed Policy (EIPM): a rapid review
• Competing events and in-hospital follow-up: issues to be aware of
• Compiling evidence to guide policy decisions on the introduction of the influenza vaccine in Kenya
• Complementary and alternative medicine in stroke rehabilitation—a systematic review of systematic reviews
• Complementary medicine use for arthritis patients in Korea: a systematic review of prevalence studies
• Complementary medicine use in the adult congenital heart community: what evidence do patients need and want?
• Completeness of outcome specification across Cochrane Systematic Reviews of three common eye conditions: time to be more explicit!
• Completeness of outcomes description reported in low-back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane Reviews
• Completeness of reporting of exercise training interventions in cancer randomized controlled trials published after 2010
• Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke: a systematic review
• Completeness of reporting of rapid reviews of primary studies according to journal publication status using PRISMA and PRISMA for Abstracts
• Completing a full systematic review in under two weeks: processes, barriers and facilitators
• Completing A Systematic Review in Diabetes: The Fish Oil Supplementation in Type 2 Diabetes Story
• Completing the first Cochrane overview of stroke reviews: experiences of the Cochrane Stroke Group
• Complex interventions and composite outcomes in Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis: double challenge in i-WIP IPD
• Complex interventions and evidence translation to specific contexts: how additional analytic approaches can meet the needs of decision-makers
• Complex interventions require description beyond methodological items to allow clinical replicability: the REREP study of randomized controlled trials in rehabilitation
• Complex interventions required to comprehensively educate allied health practitioners on evidence-based practice
• Complex reviews 1: Issues and challenges in developing review questions for complex interventions
• Complex reviews 2: Unpacking implementation factors and practical approaches to data extraction, analysis and synthesis
• Complex reviews 3: Applying the GRADE criteria and presenting findings using ‘Summary of Findings’ tables
• Complexity in public health interventions - stakeholders' perspective: a qualitative analysis
• Complying with Cochrane's Conflict of Interest policy
• Comprehensive author training for improving risk of bias assessment
• Comprehensive Meta Analysis - a computer program
• Comprehensive overview of conduct and reporting of cross-sectional studies on STROBE statement in public health field of China
• Comprehensive overview of methods and reporting of meta-analyses of test accuracy
• Comprehensive searching for systematic reviews: A comparison of database performance
• Comprehensive systematic review of complex interventions facilitated by means of new software program
• Comprehensive systematic review training programme
• Computed vs. effective intercoder reliability for systematic reviews
• Computer-aided diagnosis for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis
• Computer-based health information management in the developing World
• Computerized decision support system: an effective pathway to filter information overloads to improve clinical decisions
• Computerized protocols for diagnostic test ordering: reliability, cost and patient satisfaction
• Computers Are Your Friend? Using Artificial Intelligence in Rapid Reviews
• Concept and design of a cluster-randomized trial testing the impact of disseminating evidence-based recommendations in non-communicable diseases in Colombia
• Concept for teaching medical students evidence-based and Cochrane methods
• Conceptualisation of different types of 'evidence' as used and understood by a broad range of public health stakeholders
• Conceptualizing the reporting of living systematic reviews
• Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic analysis
• Concordance of data between conference abstracts and full reports
• Concordance of reporting of primary outcomes in abstracts and full text of randomized clinical trials: Is there an outcome reporting bias?
• Conditional cash transfers and the ethical dimension
• Conduct and dissemination of epidemiological systematic reviews in Latin America and the Caribbean: Pitfalls and lessons learned
• Conducting a broad organisational systematic review: examining the effect of sensory environments on health-related outcomes of hospital patients
• Conducting a Cochrane Methods Peer Review – Good Practice and Common Challenges
• Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative tuberculosis treatment adherence studies: a reflection on the process
• Conducting a needs assessment for Cochrane learning
• Conducting a qualitative evidence synthesis of trial-sibling studies to inform an intervention review: experiences and preliminary results from two Cochrane Reviews
• Conducting A Systematic Overview: Quality Improvement of Diabetes Treatment
• Conducting a systematic review in Latin America: difficulties in searching studies and lessons learned
• Conducting co-registered Cochrane and Campbell reviews: the experiences of a review on mass media interventions
• Conducting High Quality Scoping Reviews: Challenges and Solutions
• Conducting multiple living systematic reviews rapidly without compromising quality is possible with an innovative approach: L·OVE COVID-19 initiative
• Conducting network meta-analysis of treatments for bladder pain syndrome in adults: benefits and challenges
• Conducting network meta-analysis with sparse data and many interventions: recent examples and the issues they raise
• Conducting overviews of reviews: lessons learned since 2006
• Conducting Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Why, when and how?
• Confidence in qualitative synthesised findings: A principled and pragmatic critique of ConQual and GRADE-CERQual
• Confidence interval estimation following trial sequential analysis: a comparison of methods using cancer trials
• Confidence regarding evidence-based practice in outpatient department nurses
• Configurational ‘qualitative’ synthesis for evidence-based policy and practice: breaking down the qualitative/quantitative divide
• Conflict of interest among clinical practice guidelines authors
• Conflict of interest disclosure and management in Japanese clinical practice guidelines
• Conflict of interest disclosure in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey
• Conflict of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
• Conflict of interest policies for clinical practice guideline organizations do not measure up to IOM standards
• Conflict of interest policies in practice guideline development: a systematic survey of published guidance
• Conflicting guidelines for screening mammography: Influence of author’s specialty and conflicts of interest
• Conflicts of interest and recommendations in clinical guidelines, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: methodological systematic review
• Conflicts Of Interest and Risk of Bias In Systematic Reviews On Interventions For 6 Common Diagnoses in Primary Care
• Confounding, effect modification and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations
• Connecting evidence-based guidelines with clinical practice: strategies and lessons learned across a large USA integrated healthcare delivery system
• Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
• CONSENSYS: an instrument to support CONtextual SENsitivity in SYStematic reviews
• Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders
• Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: a series of systematic reviews
• Conservative treatment of stress incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
• Consideration of dose comparability in Cochrane reviews on antidepressants
• Consideration of patient-relevant outcomes in Cochrane reviews
• Considerations for Establishing a New, Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journal: A Partially Completed Protocol
• Considered judgement in evidence-based guidelines development
• Considering aspects of equity and diversity in the assessment of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: preliminary results
• Considering importance of outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline
• Considering scope in the planning and completion of systematic reviews
• Considering the weight of loops for assessing the certainty of indirect evidence of network meta-analysis.
• Consistency of adverse events from literature and real world state monitoring data
• Consistency of outcome and statistical reporting of time-to-event data: the impact on Cochrane Reviews and meta-analyses in epilepsy
• Consistency of protocol and safety data reporting in clinical trial registrations and corresponding publications of interventions involving 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
• Consolidating tools for assessment of risk of bias for individual participant data meta-analysis: a case study.
• CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials (CENT) guidelines
• CONSORT for Abstract reporting items by subscription and open access (OA) journals
• CONSORT for Abstracts: Guidance to improve the quality of reporting of randomized trials in conference and journal abstracts
• CONSORT for improving the quality of reports of random­ized trials: a large scale survey of PubMed articles
• CONSORT guidelines for reporting abstracts of randomized trials: a survey of its impact on high impact journals
• CONSORT in China
• Constancy of relative indices of treatment effect across different definitions of response derived from continuous scales: secondary analyses of individual-patient trial database of second-generation antipsychotics
• Constrains of conducting a Cochrane review in a resource limited setting
• Constraints on academic freedom in industry-initiated clinical trials
• Constructing an overview of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
• Construction of a clinical pathway development working group
• Construction of minimum data set for core outcome set in real-world settings: A data-driven approach
• Consulting with young people to inform systematic reviews: An example from a review on the effects of schools on health
• Consumer access to health information on the internet: a public health issue?
• Consumer health information providers and Cochrane reviews
• Consumer impact on arthritis research
• Consumer information on prostate cancer screening
• Consumer involvement - overcoming the hurdles
• Consumer Involvement 101: producing Cochrane evidence with consumers
• Consumer involvement in The Cochrane Collaboration
• Consumer involvement in the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group
• Consumer involvement in the editorial processes of health research journals: how we can learn from one another and embed good practice
• Consumer Involvement in the Interpretation, Dissemination and Implementation of the Results of Systematic Reviews: 4 Collaborative Review Group Perspectives.
• Consumer involvement: All talk and no action?
• Consumer needs for medicines information: a role for Cochrane?
• Consumer participation in resource allocation decisions: a systematic review
• Consumer participation in The Cochrane Collaboration - comparison of two models
• Consumer participation on a Cochrane Review team
• Consumer priority survey: bridging the gap between producers and users of systematic reviews
• Consumer Representation in Complementary Medicine
• Consumer representation on the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group
• Consumer support and education beyond national borders: A case study
• Consumer support and education beyond national borders: phase 3
• Consumer training - is it valuable and worthwhile?
• Consumer-led knowledge translation: leveraging patient networks to disseminate Cochrane Reviews
• Consumers and Physician United for the best Health Care: a model for building a national advocacy coalition
• Consumers Setting Priorities for Cochrane Review Groups
• Consumers speak out! What do we want results reporting to look like?
• Consumers United for Evidence-based health care (CUE): a model for building a national consumer advocacy coalition
• Consumers United for Evidence-based Healthcare (CUE): Development of a consumer advocacy coalition in the United States
• Consumers: roles, tasks, level of involvement and impact in Cochrane systematic reviews
• Consumers' roles in topics identification In systematic reviews
• Content analysis of rehabilitation definitions for research purposes