Index

Health Systems Evidence: the development of a ‘one-stop-shop’ of health systems research evidence to support policymaking 2013 Québec City
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in health services: The Sentinel Network as a forum for Evidence Based Health 2007 Sao Paulo
Health Technology Assessment in India: a beginning for healthcare decision making 2016 Seoul
Health Technology Assessment of Dialysis Membranes: Baseline Report 2002 Stavanger
Health Technology Assessment of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Induced Abortion: Baseline Report 2002 Stavanger
Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: A qualitative evidence synthesis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Healthy work environments: the experience of conducting a series of comprehensive systematic reviews, including the review of qualitative research and non-research data 2005 Melbourne
Help! Where do I begin? A troubleshooting guide to updating a Cochrane intervention review as a new review author 2019 Santiago
Helping Cochrane Reviews soar: a workshop to create a communication and dissemination strategy for every Cochrane Review 2013 Québec City
Helping doctors to understand screening tests 2008 Freiburg
Helping ministers and senior officials understand Cochrane evidence 2016 Seoul
Helping readers understand review update status: Pilot of a simple system 2011 Madrid
Helping the cause of trusted evidence: the work of Cochrane Germany, Austria and Switzerland 2023 London
Helping to ensure review relevance: exploring the potential benefits and costs of multi-perspective review advisory groups 2006 Dublin
Hepatitis A immunisation in South Africa: Using Cochrane reviews as a part of decision-making 2020 Abstracts
Heterogeneity and complexity within reviews of social research: the perspective of ‘divergent’ reviews 2010 Keystone
Heterogeneity estimates ﬂuctuate according to the number of pooled trials 2009 Singapore
Heterogeneity in diagnostic-test accuracy Cochrane reviews 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: misconceiving I² 2008 Freiburg
Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews 2009 Singapore
Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Studies 1999 Rome
Heterogeneity in systematic reviews on spinal surgery: A meta-epidemiological study 2011 Madrid
Heterogeneity sample size correction factor for meta-analyses 2005 Melbourne
Hidden conflicts of interests in meta-analyses of pharmacological treatments 2010 Keystone
Hidden voices: Towards participant-led research in gender-based violence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Hide and seek! Looking for studies included and (missing) links to other versions 2007 Sao Paulo
Hierarchical network meta-analysis models accounting for variability in nodes by treatment, dosage-category and single dosage 2015 Vienna
High 5s project. Hospital survey on patient safety culture results from Germany 2011 Madrid
High dropout rates in trials included in Cochrane reviews 2006 Dublin
High First Dose Quinine for Treating Severe Malaria 2002 Stavanger
High impact collaborations: Examples from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS group 2011 Madrid
High level evidence in oncology - just how many systematic reviews? 2007 Sao Paulo
High proportion of high quality randomized clinical trials conducted by the NCI are negative or inconclusive 2005 Melbourne
High quality data abstraction for systematic reviews: from form development to data exportation 2015 Vienna
High Quality Evidence in ENT - Where are the RCTs? 2004 Ottawa
High risk cancer screening in workers exposed to asbestos. Application of evidence through partnerships in managing injured workers 2013 Québec City
High risk of bias in many systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes 2016 Seoul
High-level evidence of acupuncture analgesia published in PubMed-listed journals: A descriptive analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Higher-order asymptotics for random effects meta-analysis: an empirical evaluation 2013 Québec City
Highlights and challenges of co-creating evidence-based knowledge translation tools for parents about the COVID-19 pandemic 2023 London
HIRA’s evidence supports rational decision making 2018 Edinburgh
Hitting the right target—disseminating Cochrane Review findings for greatest impact 2013 Québec City
HIV / AIDS and behaviour change - The impact of Soul City at an individual and broader community level of analysis. 2000 Cape Town
HIV and progressive resistive exercise: a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review 2004 Ottawa
HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): a systematic review integrating "qualitative" studies and trials. 2004 Ottawa
HIV/AIDS and oral candidiasis: what really works? 2005 Melbourne
HIV/AIDS reviewer mentoring programme for South Asia 2005 Melbourne
Hodgkin Lymphoma in patients infected by HIV under the combined antiretroviral therapy: a meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Home versus centre based physical activity programs in older adults 2004 Ottawa
Hone your skills as consumer referees for Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
Hooked on evidence-based consumer health information: the experience of a new bi-lingual national website 2006 Dublin
Horizon scanning in multiple sclerosis decisions in Brazil 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Host a Cochrane Associate Centre! The impact of Cochrane Madrid, much more than reviews 2019 Santiago
How ‘evidence-based’ is Wikipedia? 2008 Freiburg
How ‘similar’ are studies included in Cochrane Reviews? 2019 Santiago
How a Cochrane Systematic Review Changed National and International Policy and Practice 2002 Stavanger
How a health technology assessment (HTA) agency may promote evidence-based health care and research 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How a systematic review and continued stakeholder engagement can lead to a theory of change relevant to the aid sector 2018 Edinburgh
How accessible is the Cochrane Library for health professionals with little or no previous knowledge of the site? 2005 Melbourne
How accurate are abstracts and how can we Improve their accuracy? 1999 Rome
How action helps to produce evidence: Factors influencing the production of systematic reviews conducted by the Cochrane HIV/AIDS group 2000 Cape Town
How and when to pool data in meta-analyses to make the results clinically meaningful 2011 Madrid
How and when to stop living guideline recommendations? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How and where to search for secondary evidence on ‘upstream’ interventions for public health problems: a case study 2008 Freiburg
How and why do evidence-based screening recommendations from national guideline institutions differ: cross sectional study. 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How applicable is evidence from randomized controlled trials to patients receiving stroke rehabilitation in England? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How approaches to public and professional involvement can vary across evidence synthesis projects while still involving the principles of co-production 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How are guidelines on topics with little scientific evidence developed and how are decisions made? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How are policy-makers using the evidence? Models of research utilisation in theory and practice 1997 Amsterdam
How are qualitative methods being used alongside complex health service randomized controlled trials? A systematic review 2006 Dublin
How are realist reviews conducted? A systematic mapping review of realist reviews 2015 Vienna
How are stakeholders involved in systematic reviews? Findings from a systematic review of methods. 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How are the topics of Cochrane reviews decided? 1999 Rome
How big are the biases associated with non-randomised designs used in evaluations of healthcare interventions? An empirical investigation. 2000 Cape Town
How blind are we? 1996 Adelaide
How broad should you go? Searching for a public health intervention review 2009 Singapore
How can a framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) improve the quality of Cochrane reviews? 2023 London
How can consumer input be integrated into the systematic review process? 2005 Melbourne
How can patient involvement promote systematic review development? Results of patient interview nested in a network meta-analysis 2023 London
How can researchers best employ mixed-methods to enhance the accessibility and utility of evidence reviews? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How can systematic reviews of randomised trials be used for assessment of cost-effectiveness of surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress? 1994 Hamilton
How can the impacts of dissemination bias in qualitative research be detected in the context of qualitative evidence syntheses? Identifying new approaches 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How can we accurately diagnose schizophrenia? Challenges in performing Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews in schizophrenia 2014 Hyderabad
How can we ensure that Cochrane’s standards and approaches to Plain Language Summaries are implemented? A discussion workshop 2015 Vienna
How can we improve the way we do systematic reviews? 1999 Rome
How can we improve trials assessing the effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for substance use? Methodological issues encountered during a systematic review 2013 Québec City
How can we make Cochrane Reviews more readable? 2014 Hyderabad
How can we make reporting of systematic reviews more valuable for users? 1999 Rome
How can we spread the gospel if we cannot write it down? - more room for qualitative reviews 1996 Adelaide
How Chinese resources contribute to Cochrane reviews 2012 Auckland
How clear and simple are for laypeople the Plain Language Summaries and abstracts in Spanish? A readability assessment of 2019 Cochrane Systematic Reviews 2020 Abstracts
How Cochrane reviews can be used in a dissemination project: preliminary findings from the "PartecipaSalute" project in Italy 2006 Dublin
How complete are prostate cancer studies conducted in Germany as displayed in the national trial register of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie (German Association of Urology)? 2015 Vienna
How comprehensive is the Epistemonikos database for identifying systematic reviews in health: a methodological study 2019 Santiago
How Comprehensive Is The MeSH Term "Breast Neoplasms"? 1999 Rome
How conclusive are Cochrane neonatal reviews? 2016 Seoul
How connected is Academia? Using Social Network Analysis as a tool to map decision-maker engagement and policy influence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How could press releases about evidence increase the uptake of evidence concepts in media reporting? An exploratory study 2010 Keystone
How current are systematic reviews at the time of publication? 2009 Singapore
How detailed is the reporting of web searching to identify studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews? 2018 Edinburgh
How did media coverage of health research published by Irish academic institutions (2017–2023) change over time? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How different are conference abstracts of surgical RCTs from the subsequent full publication? 2004 Ottawa
How difficult is it to register a Cochrane title? An Iberoamerican authors' sample 2006 Dublin
How do authors investigate selective publication in diagnostic test accuracy reviews? 2013 Québec City
How do authors of Cochrane Overviews deal with conflicts of interest relating to their own systematic reviews? 2015 Vienna
How do authors of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews disseminate their findings after publication? A mixed methods study 2016 Seoul
How do authors respond to written requests for additional information? 2005 Melbourne
How do cancer screening guidelines trade off benefits versus harms and burdens of screening: A systematic survey 2020 Abstracts
How do characteristics, methodological and reporting quality differ between clinical practice guidelines with and without prospective registration? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How do characteristics, reporting methods and preparation times differ between systematic reviews with and without a published protocol? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How do clinicians decide on appropriate treatment when there is a lack of high level evidence? 2008 Freiburg
How do Cochrane review authors interpret subgroup analyses? 2015 Vienna
How do Cochrane reviewers address adverse effects of drug therapy? 2000 Cape Town
How do Cochrane reviewers handle sparse data in their systematic reviews? 2005 Melbourne
How do Cochrane Reviews use information from trial registers? Findings from a cross-sectional audit 2019 Santiago
How do Cochrane reviews use information from trial registers? Findings from a cross-sectional audit 2020 Abstracts
How do German guideline-based performance measures in oncology contribute to evidence-based, patient-centred care? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How do meta-analysts actually interpret metaanalyses? 2009 Singapore
How do physicians fill gaps in their medical knowledge? An overview of systematic reviews 2019 Santiago
How do systematic review users and producers interpret the stability of review findings based on GRADE quality of evidence ratings? 2014 Hyderabad
How do systematic reviews incorporate assessment of study quality into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study 2014 Hyderabad
How do systematic reviews of insulin and drug therapies for diabetes deal with heterogeneity of results? 2011 Madrid
How do the search results of the Ichushi-Web influence systematic review? The case of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) 2015 Vienna
How do the study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing? 2018 Edinburgh
How do we assess the impact of the CDSR: a protocol for discussion 1997 Amsterdam
How do we value psychological outcomes in systematic reviews? 2006 Dublin
How do you get the biggest bang for your (limited) buck in depression management? Making sense of complex cost effectiveness data using systematic reviews and the permutation matrix 2005 Melbourne
How do you search comprehensively for randomized controlled trials in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that are published in Chinese? 2019 Santiago
How does low quality evidence shape state government health policy? A case study of hepatitis C treatment 2015 Vienna
How does meta-analysis handle studies with zero events in both arms: a systematic survey of Cochrane systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
How does the current Burden of Disease ranking (from the GBD project) compare to that of topics in Cochrane and Prospero’s SRs registered in the last 5 years by region? 2020 Abstracts
How does the number and scatter of trials vary by discipline? 2011 Madrid
How does the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews compare with non-Cochrane systematic reviews in HIV prevention? 2012 Auckland
How editors of leading Chinese medical journals involving in Cochrane collaboration - Experience of Chinese cochrane center 2000 Cape Town
How effective are Cochrane Clinical Answers at providing a clear response to the clinical questions posed? 2018 Edinburgh
How effective is teaching critical appraisal skills to healthcare professionals? A systematic review of the literature 1997 Amsterdam
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions: a Cochrane methodology systematic review 2009 Singapore
How efficient are published search filters for identifying prognosis research in systematic reviews: is there still room for improvement? 2018 Edinburgh
How empty are empty reviews? A report on empty reviews in the CDSR and an invitation to participate in the development of reporting guidelines 2010 Keystone
How EPPI-Reviewer can support production of your Cochrane Review 2018 Edinburgh
How evidence-based are clinical practice guidelines in anaesthesiology: the cases of preoperative care and difficult airway management 2019 Santiago
How evidence-based are Print- and Online Mass-Media in Austria? A quantitative analysis 2015 Vienna
How evidence-based are the pharmaceutical industry’s printed promotional material presented to physicians: a multinational study 2010 Keystone
How evidence-based are the pharmaceutical industryás printed promotional material presented to physicians in three Latin American countries 2011 Madrid
How evidence-based is online information for patients? Analysis of orthodontic websites for accuracy of content compared to systematic review findings 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How far away for consumers in developing countries involving in the Collaboration?--- The experience of the consumer work in China 2004 Ottawa
How Fragile the Positive Results of Chinese Herbal Medicine Randomized Controlled Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome Are 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How Glaxo Wellcome contributes to the avoidance of publication bias 1999 Rome
How global is our knowledge? Population diversity in observational studies on selenium and cancer risk 2008 Freiburg
How good are the estimates of the hazard ratio When calculated indirectly? An empirical investigation 2000 Cape Town
How handling of missing data impacts trial results: a meta-epidemiological study 2014 Hyderabad
How hard is to do an overview of Cochrane Reviews? Could CORE outcomes help? 2019 Santiago
How has increased local accountability in public health decision making changed how local evidence is used? 2018 Edinburgh
How has usage of full text Cochrane Reviews developed since 2011 and what are the factors that lead to an increase or decrease in usage? 2014 Hyderabad
How health equity characteristics were reported in Chinese clinical practice guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
How Important is the Size of a Reprint Order? 2002 Stavanger
How interventions improve women’s agency and create an enabling environment for entrepreneurship in agribusiness: an evidence and gap map 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How is equity addressed in Cochrane reviews of lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health? 2023 London
How is Evidence Used in Pathology? Using Evidence Gap Maps to shine a light on existing practice and research needs. 2023 London
How is information on adverse effects identified for systematic reviews? A survey of methods used from 1994 to 2005 2006 Dublin
How is quality analysis carried out for systematic reviews of nursing interventions?: umbrella review 2023 London
How is the agreement between machine and humans? Use of RobotReviewer to evaluate the risk of bias of randomized trials 2018 Edinburgh
How is the networking around the world? 2005 Melbourne
How is the timing of clinical trial registration related to clinical trial characteristics and risk of bias? 2018 Edinburgh
How long does it take to publish a high quality trial in oncology? 2005 Melbourne
How low should you go? The impact of including cross-sectional study designs on guideline recommendations 2020 Abstracts
How many adolescents are actually included in randomised trials primarily in adults with asthma? An analysis of recent trial reports 2015 Vienna
How many evidence based guidelines in China 2011 Madrid
How many false ‘RCTs’ were included in Cochrane systematic reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine? 2008 Freiburg
How many guidelines are developed by evidence-based methods in Korea? Evaluation of 54 guidelines developed by Korean specialty societies 2008 Freiburg
How many guidelines of social medicine/preventive medicine/community medicine in China 2012 Auckland
How many journals adopt reporting guidance for RCTs, systematic reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines in 'Instructions for authors'? A cross-section survey from 150 medical journals 2015 Vienna
How many meta-analyses of surgery searched grey literature, is it helpful? A cross-sectional analysis of robot-assisted versus traditional surgery 2018 Edinburgh
How many more systematic reviews do we need - an estimation on the proportion of possible interventions covered by The Cochrane Library 2006 Dublin
How many negative studies included in meta-analysis in China 2012 Auckland
How many network meta-analyses were adopted by clinical practice guidelines? A cross-sectional survey 2018 Edinburgh
How many practice guidelines are based on systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of WHO guidelines 2018 Edinburgh
How many randomized trials on the therapeutic interventions for a specific clinical condition are covered by Cochrane reviews? 2010 Keystone
How many redundant publications does it take to screw in a light bulb? 1996 Adelaide
How many reports you can trust? A cross-sectional study to characterize the quality of research reporting 2015 Vienna
How many reviews are using automation？A cross-sectional analysis 2020 Abstracts
How many sample sizes are sufficient to support high-quality evidence - exemplified by a systematic review of iguratimod for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis 2018 Edinburgh
How mental health experts and patient representatives contribute to the development of a first aid manual for mental health problems 2019 Santiago
How meta-analytical inferences in practice depend on the choice of between-trial variance estimator 2008 Freiburg
How much attention was paid to patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials and meta-analyses of rectal cancer surgery? 2019 Santiago
How much confidence to put on health systems reviews?: a comparative assessment using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS 2023 London
How much do Cochrane editors and authors, and health care consumers accept the new reporting style? 2020 Abstracts
How much published data is usable for meta-analysis in aetiological research? 2005 Melbourne
How much study participant data is missing from our trials? 2015 Vienna
How often are ineffective interventions still used in clinical practice? A cross-sectional survey of 6272 clinicians in China 2016 Seoul
How often are patient-important outcomes represented in neonatal randomised controlled trials? An assessment of Cochrane neonatal reviews 2016 Seoul
How often do decision analyses of interventions agree with matching systematic reviews? 2011 Madrid
How often do guideline developing groups adopt the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach? A rapid review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How often do positive conclusions drawn from meta-analyses remain substantiated if only data from randomised trials with adequate allocation concealment are considered? 2004 Ottawa
How often does an individual trial agree with its corresponding meta-analysis? A meta-epidemiologic study 2015 Vienna
How often does unclear allocation concealment in randomised trials reflect inadequate reporting of adequate methods? 2004 Ottawa
How often is a Cochrane review the best available evidence? Analysis of the more relevant clinical questions 2015 Vienna
How often is a Cochrane Review the best available evidence? Evidence map using Epistemonikos 2018 Edinburgh
How often should “living” systematic reviews be updated? A cross-sectional study 2023 London
How pervasive are unit of analysis errors in cluster randomised trials: A review of diabetes quality improvement RCTs? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How policy makers and researchers disappoint each other: can systematic reviews avoid this history? 1999 Rome
How precise are we when assessing imprecision?: an analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews published during 2019 2020 Abstracts
How public agencies prioritize for systematic reviews: the UK experience 1999 Rome
How rare are adverse drug effects? Assessing the frequency of harm effects of drug treatments for the management of sciatica in primary care 2013 Québec City
How recommendations from systematic reviews can be used to best inform practice - three examples from the field of transfusion medicine 2006 Dublin
How relevant is the choice of the outcome in meta-analyses using relative risk as summary statistic? 2005 Melbourne
How reviewers handle heterogeneity 2000 Cape Town
How should clinicians and policy makers implement case management for depression? Using meta-regression to open up the black box of a complex intervention 2005 Melbourne
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? 2023 London
How Should We Interpret Updated Meta-analyses? 1999 Rome
How social media supports health professionals' knowledge uptake in clinical practice: A realist inquiry 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How systematic are reviews of health economics? 1995 Oslo
How systematic reviews of prevalence conduct meta-analysis? 2019 Santiago
How systematic reviews/Cochrane reviews can inform guideline development and change practice 2004 Ottawa
How the Evidence Synthesis Hackathon supports Open Synthesis and the efficient and rigorous production of systematic reviews 2019 Santiago
How the Evidence Synthesis Hackathon supports the efficient and rigorous production of systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
How the Shenzhen government could become a pioneer in rapid-learning health system 2020 Abstracts
How to access RCTs in Japan through network access from abroad 1994 Hamilton
How to addressing equity in guidelines: a review 2013 Québec City
How to apply the new guidance for plain language summaries for Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews to an example review 2018 Edinburgh
How to appraise Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis in diagnostic and prognostic risk prediction research 2014 Hyderabad
How to ask an answerable question for health care and health research: For consumers 2012 Auckland
How to assess overall quality of systematic reviews of prediction models published in Chinese journals using AMSTAR and PRISMA 2020 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to assess the evidence when a statistical synthesis is not possible 2018 Edinburgh
How to assess the overall quality of guidelines using the AGREE instrument 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to assess the scientific integrity of the work of one author or author group? 2023 London
How to author, publish and dynamically update digital and trustworthy evidence summaries, recommendations and decision aids through MAGICapp 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to author, publish, and dynamically update digital and trustworthy living evidence summaries, guidelines, and decision aids using MAGICapp 2023 London
How to avoid retraction of systematic reviews? a cross-sectional study 2023 London
How to be better prepared to address evidence needs during health crisis: a proposed action plan for rapid evidence synthesis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to Bring the Evidence to the Consumer? 2002 Stavanger
How to build evidence network of interventional studies? 2011 Madrid
How to choose biomedical databases to conduct systematic reviews for Chinese reviewers: A comparison between biomedical databases 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to choose the right journal for your systematic review 2014 Hyderabad
How to conduct reviews of risks of health effects resulting from exposure 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to consider health equity in systematic reviews and GRADE guideline development 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to create a matrix of evidence in Epistemonikos 2014 Hyderabad
How to critically appraise qualitative research papers and prepare for data-extraction 2013 Québec City
How to deal with conflict of interest in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents 2020 Abstracts
How to Design a Trial to Achieve More Significant Positive Results? A Methodological Exploration Using PRECIS-2 Tool 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to design clinical trials to assess health equity effectiveness? 2004 Ottawa
How to design future studies based on conditional power of network meta-analysis 2013 Québec City
How to determine the best treatment: a mixed-treatment-comparisons meta-analysis (MTM) of trials of topical fluoride therapies for the prevention of dental caries 2005 Melbourne
How to develop and publish a digital, living and trustworthy evidence summary and recommendation through the MAGIC authoring and publication platform 2016 Seoul
How to develop and publish a trustworthy evidence summary through the MAGIC authoring and publication platform 2015 Vienna
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane intervention reviews 2013 Québec City
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane intervention reviews 2012 Auckland
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane intervention reviews 2014 Hyderabad
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane intervention reviews 2015 Vienna
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane Intervention Reviews 2016 Seoul
How to develop brief economic commentaries for Cochrane Intervention Reviews 2018 Edinburgh
How to develop, publish and dynamically update a trustworthy evidence summary through the MAGIC authoring and publication platform 2018 Edinburgh
How to disseminate and implement guidelines: a systematic review of guidance documents 2020 Abstracts
How to do a rapid review – updated methods guidance 2023 London
How to do knowledge translation without money 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to Ensure Local Impact? Lessons from a National Guidelines Program in Saudi Arabia 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to ensure your evidence synthesis meets conduct and reporting standards: Top tips from Cochrane’s Quality Assurance team 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to estimate the false positive risk 2018 Edinburgh
How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical screening? 2009 Singapore
How to explain statistical heterogeneity of strategies to improve guideline adherence? 2015 Vienna
How to explore user experience when developing communication products 2013 Québec City
How to extract, analyse and present results in scoping reviews 2023 London
How to handsearch paper and electronic journals and conference proceedings to identify articles eligible for the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Clinical Trials 2008 Freiburg
How to identify and assess the impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis 2006 Dublin
How to identify clinical questions for practice guideline: A case analysis of a Chinese perioperative blood-glucose management guideline 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to improve the credibility of meta-analysis? How to avoid mistakes in choosing the statistical method of estimation? The Bayesian and traditional approaches 2011 Madrid
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols 1: background, objectives, outcome measures and types of studies 2015 Vienna
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols 1: background, objectives, outcome measures and types of studies 2016 Seoul
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols 2: searches, risk of bias and methodological quality, data collection and analysis 2016 Seoul
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols 2: searches, risk of bias and methodological quality, data collection and analysis 2015 Vienna
How to include economics in Cochrane Review protocols: background, objectives, outcome measures and types of studies – Part 1 2013 Québec City
How to include economics in Cochrane Review protocols: searches, risk of bias and methodological quality, data collection and analysis – Part 2 2013 Québec City
How to include economics in Cochrane Review Protocols. Part 1: background, objectives, outcome measures and types of studies 2014 Hyderabad
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols. Part 1: background, study questions, outcome measures and types of studies 2008 Freiburg
How to include economics in Cochrane review protocols. Part 2: search methods, critical appraisal, data collection and analysis 2008 Freiburg
How to include economics in Cochrane Review Protocols. Part 2: searches, risk of bias and methodological quality, data collection and analysis 2014 Hyderabad
How to incorporate information on funding and conflicts of interest in trials when conducting a Cochrane Review: the TACIT tool 2023 London
How to Integrate Knowledge Syntheses into Learning Health Systems: Reflections from Academic-Health System Partnerships in Alberta, Canada 2020 Abstracts
How to integrate patient/consumer perspectives from qualitative synthesis within your Cochrane Review 2018 Edinburgh
How to integrate sustainability in clinical guidelines? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to interpret patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane reviews 2005 Melbourne
How to Involve Consumers in Cochrane Reviews? 1999 Rome
How to involve consumers: A guide for Cochrane Editors 2011 Madrid
How to involve patients and the public in living guidelines 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to make the best use of published summary statistics in systematic reviews of survival data 1997 Amsterdam
How to make the medical standard information database to use for all 1996 Adelaide
How to measure the rate of knowledge transfer from clinical trials to clinical practice guidance 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to meet advances in science when developing evidence-based practice guidelines: AGREE II, IOM, AMSTAR, GRADE 2016 Seoul
How to obtain NNT from Cohenás d: Comparison of two methods 2011 Madrid
How to optimise the implementation of a computerised decision-support tool for knee osteoarthritis in Belgian general practice? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to perform an advanced electronic search in the health sciences databases LILACS and IBECS 2019 Santiago
How to plan and implement synthesis questions (part 1): using the InSynQ checklist and guide for question development 2023 London
How to plan and implement synthesis questions (part 2): Implementing PICO in RevMan to streamline data extraction and analyses 2023 London
How to popularize evidence-based medicine? An example of construction and application of methodological research advisory center 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to prioritise diseases when developing clinical pathways 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to prioritise review topics with stakeholders: A method for prioritising systematic review topics in health, education and social welfare 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to prioritize diseases/conditions by using traditional Chinese medicine: Chinese experience 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to provide evidence-based information and translate Cochrane reviews to lay people in a deliberative setting: the Italian and the Australian citizen juries experience on population screening 2015 Vienna
How to provide more timely and reliable evaluations of the effects of interventions: a new Framework for Adaptive Meta-analysis (FAME) 2018 Edinburgh
How to rapidly review the literature when planning a new clinical trial – a practical guide 2023 London
How to rate the certainty of prediction modelling studies in a systematic review? 2019 Santiago
How to report research gaps in clinical practice guidelines? Findings and recommendations 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to search for clinical trials on the LILACS database using the internet 2000 Cape Town
How to search for studies for inclusion in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews 2008 Freiburg
How to search practice guidelines efficiently: systematic review 2016 Seoul
How to select the most appropriate validity assessment for your review: the LATITUDES Network 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
How to share evidence on Wikipedia: introduction to Wikipedia editing skills 2019 Santiago
How to turn your Cochrane Review into a high quality scientific poster for presentation at meetings 2016 Seoul
How to turn your Cochrane Review into a high quality scientific poster for presentation at meetings 2015 Vienna
How to use and evaluate OpenAlex tools for efficient automated updating of systematic reviews and maps in EPPI-Reviewer 2023 London
How to use Cochrane summary of findings tables and individualized baseline risks to inform personalized care plans and population health 2016 Seoul
How to use existing related guidelines in the development of a new guideline? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
How to use GRADE to assess, interpret and present findings of a review 2016 Seoul
How to use GRADE to assess, interpret and present findings of a review 2015 Vienna
How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence 2019 Santiago
How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence 2018 Edinburgh
How to use the GRADE approach to assess, interpret and present evidence (in Spanish) 2019 Santiago
How to write an abstract for a conference based on your Cochrane Review 2016 Seoul
How to write evidence synthesis reports for policy makers: a nine-step practical manual 2016 Seoul
How useful is GRADEpro for assessing evidence from epidemiological or diagnostic accuracy studies 2011 Madrid
How Valuable is Effort to Contact Authors to Obtain Missing Data in Systematic Reviews 1999 Rome
How was patient involvement in shared decision making covered in Cochrane review? 2014 Hyderabad
How well are we really doing? The HIV/AIDS Mentoring Programme five years on 2006 Dublin
How well described are the interventions with physical activity in randomized clinical trials? 2019 Santiago
How well did the consensus methods apply in the guideline development of traditional Chinese medicine：A Web-Based Survey in China 2023 London
How well do the malaria rapid diagnostic tests for detecting the asymptomatic carriers in the endemic countries? 2010 Keystone
How well do we consider equity in efficiency analysis studies of vaccines? A systematic review of equity-informative economic evaluations of vaccines 2023 London
How Wiley have developed media coverage of Cochrane Library reviews within the international press 2005 Melbourne
How will we know whether we’re making a difference? Evaluating Cochrane’s knowledge translation impacts. 2020 Abstracts
How willing are the public to pay for anti-hypertensive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a survey in a Chinese city 2015 Vienna
HPV vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: a synthesis study of economic evaluations 2015 Vienna
HTA guide 2015 Vienna
HTA-reports in digital and multilayered formats. Supporting policy-makers in well-informed decisions for new health technologies 2019 Santiago
Human factors and ergonomics on healthcare and patient-safety practices: A systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Human infection by Strongyloides stercoralis in West Africa, 1974-2023: systematic review and meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Human post-editing to evaluate and compare the quality of three machine translation engines for Russian translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries 2020 Abstracts
Human Resources for Health in India: Evidence from a scoping review to inform local policy 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Human rights in guideline development: what is human rights evidence and how can it be used in guideline development? 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Human-translated abstracts for better health decision making 2015 Vienna
Humor therapy in clinical care: Forming PICO 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for improving symptoms of long Covid-19 syndrome: baseline report of a living systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Hypericum perforatum for depression: a meta-analysis 2008 Freiburg
Hypertension, drug treatment, and sub-group analysis: a case for updating Cochrane Handbook? 2013 Québec City
I-square statistic in meta-analysis of prevalence: worthwhile or worthless? 2020 Abstracts
ICT4D: Does the evidence match the hype? 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Ideal conditions or usual practice? The position of trials from two Cochrane reviews within the pragmaticexplanatory continuum 2010 Keystone
Identification and analysis of search strategies and filters carried out in systematic reviews indexed in Lilacs. Overview 2011 Madrid
Identification and authentication of claimed RCTs for Cochrane systematic review 2008 Freiburg
Identification and characterization of systematic reviews in eyes and vision 2007 Sao Paulo
Identification and characterization of systematic reviews in HIV/AIDS 2008 Freiburg
Identification and description of the clinical trials published in Spanish journals of general and internal medicine during the period 1971-1995 1998 Baltimore
Identification and prioritisation of essential content of an evidence-based healthcare online course for health professionals 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identification and quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in gynecology and obstetrics journals in Andean countries 2019 Santiago
Identiﬁcation and testing of tools for the classiﬁcation of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures 2009 Singapore
Identification of authorship issues by using an authorship declaration form 2023 London
Identification of biomedical journals in Spain and Latin America 2011 Madrid
Identification of clinical trials (CTs) conducted in Spain (1971-1995) 1997 Amsterdam
Identification of Clinical Trials Published in Iberoamerica (1948-1998) 1999 Rome
IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS TO COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ARISING FROM THE ADAPTATION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identification of health science publications in Spain (1971-1995) 1997 Amsterdam
Identification of nursing journals in Spain and Latin America 2016 Seoul
Identification of randomized clinical trials (RCT) in sarcoma 1997 Amsterdam
Identification of systematic reviews in LILACS 2012 Auckland
Identification of trials using electronic databases. Performance of MEDLINE and EMBASE for selected rheumatologic topics 1997 Amsterdam
Identification of true RCTs of the effects of educational interventions on asthma-related outcomes in Medline and Embase using abstracts versus full text 1995 Oslo
Identification of unpublished studies contribute to a systematic review on negative pressure wound therapy 2006 Dublin
Identification, description, and quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in orthopedics and traumatology journals from Latin America and Spain 2016 Seoul
Identifying and assessing study filters in searches for non-randomised intervention studies 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying and assessing the impact of outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis 2008 Freiburg
Identifying and considering data sovereignty and governance within systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying and dealing with participants with missing outcome data in trials: Framework for systematic review authors 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying and filling the gaps in health promotion and public health research 2004 Ottawa
Identifying and handling retracted studies affecting systematic reviews 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying and incorporating adverse effects in systematic reviews 2006 Dublin
Identifying and managing nonfinancial conflicts of interest for systematic reviews 2013 Québec City
Identifying and prioritising areas for guidance development in public health 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying approaches for including studies published in language other than English in systematic reviews: a descriptive study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying appropriate source guidelines and recommendations for GRADE-ADOLOPMENT in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa required a fit-for-setting and -capacity approach 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying asthma RCTs with Medline and Embase 1995 Oslo
Identifying barriers and facilitators to home safety interventions for the families of pre-school children 2010 Keystone
Identifying Candidate Harms for a Systematic Review 2023 London
Identifying Cochrane citation classics 2015 Vienna
Identifying common statistical errors in Cochrane reviews of interventions 2020 Abstracts
Identifying commonly used terms in systematic reviews of implementation in healthcare 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying diagnostic studies relevant for primary health care 1996 Adelaide
Identifying digital intervention research: Using bibliometric analyses to inform searching and mapping 2020 Abstracts
Identifying effective community-based drug prevention interventions 2007 Sao Paulo
Identifying evidence gaps in Chilean health research: A first step towards evidence-informed decision making and strategic research agendas. 2023 London
Identifying evidence-based practice teaching strategies in Australasian optometry curricula 2012 Auckland
Identifying existing models of public and patient involvement in palliative care research in cancer patients for better health decisions 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying future research priorities in low-and middle-income countries using an Evidence Gap Maps approach: case study of mapping reviews on cataract 2016 Seoul
Identifying global priority areas for systematic reviews in Chronic Otitis Media – the importance of stakeholder engagement 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying guideline needs for newborn and child health in South Africa, Malawi and Nigeria: a priority-setting exercise 2023 London
Identifying high priority methodological questions for conducting rapid systematic reviews: Preliminary results from an eDelphi study 2023 London
Identifying high priority review questions for Africa: Cochrane Africa’s scoping process 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying HIV Prevention Trials for Systematic Review: Comparing Manual and Automated Methods of Retrieval 1999 Rome
Identifying ineffective interventions from Cochrane reviews through the interpretation of the main Summary of Findings table 2020 Abstracts
Identifying informal recommendations in Chinese clinical practice guidelines: A cross-sectional study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying information retrieval research for systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses beyond effectiveness reviews: Summarized Research in Information Retrieval (SuRe Info). 2014 Hyderabad
Identifying key mechanisms of effective mental health and psychosocial support programmes: A cross-study synthesis of the findings from qualitative and quantitative evidence 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying methodological challenges in systematic reviews of health policy and systems research in low-and middle-income countries 2009 Singapore
Identifying national and sub-national data of maternal cause of death: challenges in epidemiologic searching of bibliographic databases 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying needs, strategies and strategic partnerships to strengthen consumer engagement in Cochrane systematic review processes 2016 Seoul
Identifying non-randomised studies in Medline 1998 Baltimore
Identifying opportunities for increased patient and public involvement in the development of the Academy’s Evidence Analysis Library Nutrition Practice Guidelines 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying optimal characteristics of Cochrane systematic review summary formats: qualitative study and three randomized controlled trials 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying participants with missing outcome data in trials included in systematic reviews: challenges and suggested solutions 2015 Vienna
Identifying participants with missing outcome data in trials included in systematic reviews: challenges and suggested solutions 2014 Hyderabad
Identifying patient-important practical issues for shared decision-making 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying predatory journals in systematic reviews 2020 Abstracts
Identifying predictors of missed studies in the abstract screening process and methods to find missed studies 2020 Abstracts
Identifying priorities for systematic reviews relevant to Australian health policy makers 2009 Singapore
Identifying Priority Health System Questions for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Experiences from the Norwegian satellite of the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group 2010 Keystone
Identifying problematic randomised trials using individual participant data 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying publication bias in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes in the presence of baseline risk 2020 Abstracts
Identifying Qualitative Research to complement Cochrane Reviews 2008 Freiburg
Identifying randomized controlled trials in conference proceedings abstracts 1998 Baltimore
Identifying randomized controlled trials in the journal Aids 2000 Cape Town
Identifying randomized controlled trials published in German general health care journals using medline and embase: How useful is the controlled 2000 Cape Town
Identifying RCTs for Systematic Reviews: An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Clinical Trial Register and Electronic Bibliographic Database Searches 2023 London
Identifying RCTs in MEDLINE by publication type and through the Cochrane Strategy: the case in hypertension 1998 Baltimore
Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Lancet: the contribution of the Cochrane Collaboration 1996 Adelaide
Identifying research gaps in CAM - Can a Cochrane consumer make a difference? 2007 Sao Paulo
Identifying research literature from low and middle income countries 2009 Singapore
Identifying resource intensive areas of systematic review production and updating – a scoping review 2020 Abstracts
Identifying review questions for future Cochrane reviews on groin and ventral hernia surgery: a meta-epidemiological study 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying studies on diagnostic tests in oncology: the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) experience 2006 Dublin
Identifying subgroups based on continuous measurements in individual patient data meta-analysis 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying systematic reviews on related topics: can we do more to help readers? 2006 Dublin
Identifying the evidence gaps in Cochrane fertility reviews 2020 Abstracts
Identifying the gaps: Cochrane Reviews on cancer prevention 2016 Seoul
Identifying the prevalence and distribution of adverse drug events in children within community settings: a scoping review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying trials, or possible trials, conducted in low and middle income countries 2005 Melbourne
Identifying underlying mechanisms between intrinsic and variable prognosticators and clinical outcomes: a structural modelling approach 2013 Québec City
Identifying values in the health policy decision-making processes about health system financing in Latin America: a critical interpretive synthesis 2019 Santiago
Identifying ways of enhancing effective evidence use in local public-health decision making 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Identifying who benefits most from treatments: How to analyse, present and interpret interactions and subgroup effects in meta-analysis 2023 London
Identifying who benefits most from treatments: how to analyse, present and interpret interactions in meta-analysis 2018 Edinburgh
Identifying with the Translator Role: MTI Students’ Translation Practices within the Cochrane Simplified Chinese Project 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
If a rapid review is the solution, what is the problem? 2015 Vienna
If you plan it, will they come? Lessons learned about participant recruitment and retention for Cochrane webinars 2013 Québec City
If, when and how to sample primary studies for inclusion in a qualitative evidence synthesis 2023 London
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2015 Vienna
Igniting minds: Use of Cochrane resources as educational tools for training medical students in developing countries 2011 Madrid
Ignoring non-significant factors without data may bias the results of meta-analysis of prognostic studies 2020 Abstracts
Illuminating review results using systematic evidence mapping 2013 Québec City
Illuminating the shadows: a critical examination of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in a scoping review on SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Illustrating Cochrane Reviews with Narrative Clips Describing Patients' Experiences of the Interventions 2002 Stavanger
Impact and evaluation of research: Perspectives from funders and users of research 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact evaluation framework for evidence-based e-health projects in Sri Lanka 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact evaluation of the Nigerian Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution, 2000-2014 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of a guideline update on recommendations and didactic material: The example of AFAM (African First Aid Materials) 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
IMPACT OF A SINGLE REVIEWER ON CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT IN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS 2023 London
Impact of active placebo controls on estimated drug effects in randomised trials 2023 London
Impact of adding data from clinical study reports to a systematic review of adverse events in cancer patients 2018 Edinburgh
Impact of Ambient Heat Exposure on Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of an evidence based pediatrics electronic journal 2011 Madrid
Impact of an evidence-based care program in a hospital in Brazil 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of an upper respiratory infection (URI) clinical guideline on costs and outcomes of care 1997 Amsterdam
Impact of asymmetry of summary ROC curves in meta-analyses comparing diagnostic test accuracy 2016 Seoul
Impact of baseline score imbalance on comparative effectiveness reviews 2012 Auckland
Impact of behavior change communication and social marketing strategies to improve compliance to IFA supplementation in LMICs: A rapid review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of climate change on adolescents' health outcomes: an evidence gap map review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of climate change on child outcomes: an Evidence Gap Map review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of Climate Change on Maternal Health Outcomes: An Evidence Gap Map Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of clinical recommendations informed by Cochrane diagnostic accuracy reviews for infectious diseases prevalent in low- and middle-income countries 2018 Edinburgh
Impact of Cochrane Corners in Portuguese journals 2015 Vienna
Impact of Cochrane reviews on health technology assessments 2012 Auckland
Impact of Cochrane systematic reviews of public health interventions for physical activity 2005 Melbourne
Impact of community animal health services: A systematic review 2000 Cape Town
IMPACT OF COVID-19 LOCKDOWN ON AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN PORT REGIONS. SCOPING REVIEW 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of cut-offs on guideline synopses for the preparation of disease-management programmes 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
IMPACT OF DATA EXTRACTION BY A SINGLE REVIEWER ON EFFECT ESTIMATES FROM META-ANALYSES 2023 London
Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on malignant tumours among type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
Impact of duplicate publication in a meta-analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery 2004 Ottawa
Impact of engagement in guideline development: a systematic review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of excluding non-English studies on network meta-analysis: an empirical study 2020 Abstracts
Impact of Expectation Bias on Effect Estimates between Non-inferiority and Superiority Randomized Clinical Trials: Retrospective Cohort Study 2023 London
Impact of funding source on reporting of adverse effects: methodological overview 2008 Freiburg
Impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cancer among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 2016 Seoul
Impact of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) on conclusions of dentistry systematic reviews 2023 London
Impact of Grey Literature on Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials - A Systematic Review 2002 Stavanger
Impact of including conference abstracts in systematic reviews: analysis from a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of COVID-19 2023 London
Impact of including Korean RCTs in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture 2012 Auckland
Impact of incretin-based therapies on abdominal pain among people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 2019 Santiago
Impact of infrastructure and direct funding on Cochrane reviews 2014 Hyderabad
Impact of missing outcome data for participants in trials included in five Cochrane Reviews: an imputation study 2014 Hyderabad
Impact of missing outcome data for trial participants included in 100 meta-analyses: an imputation study 2016 Seoul
Impact of National Institute for Health Research Cochrane Incentive Scheme on the time to deliver Cochrane Reviews 2016 Seoul
Impact of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Physical Outcomes in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of pay-for-performance on behavior of primary care physicians and patient outcomes: a systematic review 2015 Vienna
Impact of pay-for-performance on diabetic patients and physicians: a systematic review 2016 Seoul
Impact of pilot/feasibility studies in meta-analyses of acupuncture: a meta-epidemiological study 2023 London
Impact of point-of-care diagnostics on maternal outcomes in HIV-infected women: Systematic review and meta-analysis 2017 Cape Town [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of Predatory Journals in Scientific Literature: A Scoping Review 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of Prognostic Nutrition Index on the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 2024 Prague [Global Evidence Summit]
Impact of quality items on study outcome: treatments in acute lateral ankle sprains 1998 Baltimore
Impact of quality of reporting of treatment-related harms on overall therapeutic effects 2012 Auckland