• Bias associated with selective crossover in randomised controlled trials
• Bias in case-control studies of screening effects
• Bias in measurement of adverse outcomes in non-randomised studies
• Bias In Meta-Analysis Due To Within Study Selective Reporting
• Bias in meta-epidemiological studies: an exchange of ideas
• Bias in surgical randomised trials: a meta-epidemiological study using laparoscopic versus open surgery as an example
• Bias-adjusted meta-analysis: a workshop for researchers
  
• Bibliographic analysis of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group's reviews
• Bibliometric analyses along cumulative meta-analyses: the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE)
• Bibliometric analysis of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ from 2000 to 2018
• Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Bibliometric Analysis of ChatGPT’s Application in the Medical Field
  
• Big vs. Small data: Opportunities in new data sources for evidence generation
• BINDING SCIENCE AND SOCIETY: ANALYZING THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS ON GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT
• Biomedical databases: selection and searching for trials to conduct systematic reviews for Chinese reviewers
• Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery
• Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values
• Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic reviews
• Bivariate network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies synthesising multiple tests and multiple thresholds
• Bladder management in postpartum women after vaginal or caesarean delivery: a best practice implementation project
  
• Blinded assessment of the methodological quality
• Blinding in randomised controlled trials of surgical procedures in children: who, when and how
• Blood Calprotectin Quantitative High-quality Immunoassay: systematic review
• Blood pressure increasing effect of sibutramine in obese patients
• Blood pressure variability; lessons learned from a systematic review
• Blood Pressure-Lowering Efficacy: A Family of Systematic Reviews of Different Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs
• Blood transfusions for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease
• Blood-donor eligibility in Belgian Red Cross’ Blood Service: from systematic reviews to impact on policy level
• Bloodletting therapy for primary headache: A systematic review and
  meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
• Boosting global and local partnerships to promote equitable access of COVID-19 guideline recommendations: case study in China
• Bradford’s law to predict the size of the literature in cochrane reviews
• Brain metastasis management: difficulties with integrating Cochrane Review evidence into guidelines
• Brazil’s growing production of scientific review articles
• Brazilian Cochrane as MD, PhD program training center
• Brazilian Cochrane Center strategies for disseminating the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews
• Brazilian evidence support system for equitable health policies: pub crawl around the Brazilian Coalition for Evidence
  
• Brazilian guideline for diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease
• Brazilian guideline for lung cancer: recommendations and development process
  
• Brazilian guidelines for the management of adult potential brain-dead donors
• Brazilian national guideline for Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations and development process
  
• Brazilian national guideline for sickle cell disease: recommendations and development process
  
• Brazilian national guideline for systemic arterial hypertension: recommendations and development process
  
• Brazilian oral health journals in Scielo: an open access tropical treasure?
• Brazilian private health insurance guidelines: implementing coverage criteria
  
• Brazilian Spinal Muscular Atrophy Clinical Practice Guidelines History
  
• Brazilian Transcultural Adaptation of Informative Statements to Communicate the Findings of Systematic Reviews of Interventions indicated by the GRADE System
  
• Breadth and depth of review questions: mixed methods, mapping, reviews of reviews and other methods for enabling analysis of broad questions and heterogeneous data
• Breaking barriers in guideline implementation: introducing a novel software approach for standardizing clinical pathways
• Breaking Ground or Breaking Bad? Examining the Fate of Preprints in Prevention Research with a Mixed Methods Study
• Breaking silos, building bridges: leveraging collaborative evidence networks for global impact
  
• Breakthroughs and challenges in conducting systematic reviews on rare diseases: implications of the ERNs Guidelines Programme
  
• Breast cancer screening: effective and efficient as well as efficacious
• Breast cancer screening: effective and efficient as well as efficacious
• Breastfeeding on health: a Living Overview of the Evidence (L-OVE)
• Breastfeeding support and avoiding inappropriate breastmilk substitutes marketing in a neonatal ward in the Czech Republic
• Bridging clinical investigators and statisticians: publication status and problems of Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
• Bridging evidence and policy: insights from conflict and atrocity prevention Evidence and Gap Map
  
• Bridging evidence and practice: interprofessional nursing and pharmacy student training in navigating NICE resources
• Bridging evidence and practice: the experience of GESI Network members in engaging stakeholders
• Bridging gaps between Chinese reviewers and Cochrane review groups
• Bridging Gaps in Health Professional In-service Education: Harnessing Technology to improve accessibility and monitoring in Primary Care Training
• Bridging Gaps, Empowering Tomorrow’s Leaders: Lessons Learned from the 2021-2023 Cochrane US Global Health Equity Mentoring Program
  
• Bridging the gap between research results and decision making in clinical
  practice: common problems in the development and use of a national Electronic
  Library of Health Care
• Bridging the gap between science and policy at the agri-food and public health interface through a knowledge synthesis, transfer and exchange handbook
• Bridging the gap from research to practice: the emergence of a community of practice in EBM at the department of family medicine at Laval university
• Bridging the Gap: Empowering LMICs through Cochrane Evidence: Experiences of Cochrane Centers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
• Bridging the gaps across the income divide: A review of The Collaboration's efforts to date and recommendations for the future
• Bridging the gaps between evidence-based and experience-based medicine in a Swiss Cochrane Symposium
• Bridging the gaps between prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling
• Bridging the information gap in Saskatchewan: Accessing and using The Cochrane Library province-wide
• Bringing a patient perspective to understanding interventions that aim to reduce length of stay in hospital: a mixed methods synthesis
• Bringing a systematic element to complex focussed literature reviews
• Bringing best evidence to front line clinicians
• Bringing Cochrane reviews to Polish professionals and consumers
• Bringing diabetes "Alive": a radical new approach to collaborative living evidence
• Bringing evidence into practice: Use of a rapid review methodology to formulate medical recommendations for the Red Cross Blood Service
• Bringing GRADEpro to Health Technology Assessment: a pilot study to improve quality and transparency of Scoping and Project Plan in EUnetHTA
• Bringing Narrative Evidence 'into the Fold': Methods for Generalizing from Individual Narrative Data
• Bringing policy makers closer to systematic reviews: Brazilian strategies
• Bringing the culture of Cochrane to a professional medical association
• Bringing them to the table: a clarion call for considerations of digital accessibility of evidence resources to PWDs
• Broad versus narrow questions: empirical evidence of lumping and splitting of topics in Cochrane Perinatal Reviews
• Budget impact analysis in the Brazilian supplementary health care: developing an optimal spreadsheet
  
• Budget impact of including short-acting insulin analogues in the public-health system of an upper-middle income country
• Building "TULAY" (bridges) through codesigning a self-management support for stroke survivors in the Philippines
• Building a clean and comprehensive study-based register of reports of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• Building a Crowd community of 'citizen scientists' in the US through engagement and strategic partnerships
• Building a database of respiratory guidelines: why, how, and what for?
• Building a database of systematic reviews about patient safety: providing clinicians with easier access to evidence
• Building a database of validated pediatric outcomes
• Building a database of validated pediatric outcomes: an investigation of compliance with established reporting standards
• Building a diverse community: new ways to participate in Cochrane
• Building a nationwide online platform for evidence-based information in primary healthcare in Belgium
• Building a network within the evidence community: the Evidence-Based Research Network (EBRNetwork)
• Building a research team: A Cochrane US Network experience focusing on racial health equity
• Building a shared global evidence database to facilitate evidence-based decision-making in education
• Building a specialized register of behavioral medicine interventions
• Building a systematic review movement in the humanitarian field
• Building a truly global evidence ecosystem: achieving impactful collaboration by embracing equity, diversity, and inclusion
• Building acceptance for machine learning in study selection within a systematic review institution: Experiences from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health
• Building actionable knowledge from referential knowledge for evidence-based nursing practice
• Building an effective forum for evidence-informed climate change solutions
  
• Building an organization-wide evidence synthesis support system at the Public Health Agency of Canada
  
• Building awareness for evidence-based practice in Malaysia
• Building bridges between systematic reviews and Brazilian decision-making: methods for disseminating evidence
• Building Bridges: A Blueprint for establishing a Synthesis Research Center in Turkey
• Building capacity for Cochrane activity in South East Asia: impact of the SEA-ORCHID Project
• Building capacity for systematic reviews in low-income countries beyond the classroom: the Africa centre for systematic reviews and knowledge translation
• Building capacity for systematic reviews in low-income countries: the Africa centre for systematic reviews and knowledge translation
• Building capacity in EBHC: What is happening in the African region?
• Building capacity in producing trusted evidence – Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland Fellowships
• Building Capacity of Indian Scientists in Conduct of Systematic Reviews: an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Initiative
• Building capacity to support evidence-informed public health: an innovative knowledge broker mentoring program
• Building capacity to understand and communicate complex science
  
• Building capacity with Cochrane webinars: tips and tricks for presenters
• Building evidence utilisation capacity of health policy makers at the Federal Ministry of Health in Ethiopian: Mentor – mentee experience
• Building evidence-based public health capacity in Africa: developing and piloting a workshop
• Building more robust search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews: towards improving inter-information specialists’ agreement
• Building national implementation strategies for chronic diseases guidelines in primary health care setting: results from Korean primary care physicians’ baseline survey
• Building Partnerships Across the Systematic Review Community in the United States: Efforts by the AHRQ EPC Program
• Building partnerships with the public by learning about Cochrane evidence
• Building research capacity beyond the classroom: a sociomaterial inquiry into academic health librarians' online teaching of evidence synthesis methods
• Building the evidence base for children’s and family support services using practice-based evidence
• Building the research capacity of medical officers of the Government of Nepal in health-system research
• Building up a disease-specific trials register in hemato-oncology: experiences from a project of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG)
• Bunches of evidence: displaying 'Summary of findings' tables visually as ‘evidence flowers’
• Burden of brain tumours in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review protocol
• But is it relevant? Applying the results of Cochrane Reviews to high-risk and disadvantaged populations.
• By how much does publication bias affect the results of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• C.H.A.I.N. Canada - Contact, Help, Advice & Information, Network: linking professions, organisations, researchers, practitioners and policy makers
• CADIMA: An Open Access online tool supporting the reporting and conduct of systematic reviews and systematic maps
• CADTH's Health Technology Inquiry Service: providing relevant and timely evidence for Canadian health care decision makers
• Café Scientifique—public outreach
• Calcium antagonists in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): a meta-analysis
• Calcium Antagonists Risk-Benefit and Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes: Review of Literature and Drug Utilization Profile
• Calculating confidence intervals for a net-effect estimate
• Calculating confidence intervals for the absolute risk reduction taking uncertainties of relative risk and baseline risk estimates into account
• Calculating costs: facing challenges for a cost comparison of day surgical and inpatient varicose vein surgery as an example
• Calculating standardised mean differences from cluster randomised trials using published sources
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT)
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat (NNT)
• Calculation and interpretation of the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/H)
• Calculation of absolute risk for important outcomes in patients with and without a prognostic factor of interest
• Calculation of Numbers Needed to Treat from Systematic Reviews. Point estimate and Confidence Intervals compared using six different methods.
• Calculation of variance of treatment effects when these are not reported for all arms of trials with more than two arms
• CAMELOT approach: considering methodological limitations of qualitative research within the context of GRADE-CERQual and QES
• Can a generative AI chatbot answer citizens' questions on behalf of municipal employees?
  
• Can American Indian and Alaska Native populations ever have a sufficient research base for best practices?
• Can an evidence-informed taxonomy be used to map vaccination communication interventions in ‘real world’ settings? Findings from Nigeria
• Can analysis of the effect of social disadvantage on health outcomes be improved through the use of causal pathways?
• Can artificial intelligence learn to identify systematic reviews on the effectiveness of public health interventions?
• Can artificial intelligence perform accurate peer review of literature search strategies? A proof-of-concept study
• Can assessors in a trial of psychotherapy be successfully blinded?
• Can brief interventions reduce alcohol consumption in drinkers at risk of alcohol related harm? A meta-analysis of clinical trials
• Can Cinderalla's sisters make it to the ball? Summary reviews/overviews within revMan 4.1.
• Can Cochrane's machine learning classifier increase the efficiency of guideline production?
• Can consumers improve the quality of Cochrane reviews?
• Can data extraction from figures perform a meta-analysis?
• Can diagnostic filters offer similar sensitivity and a reduced number needed to read compared to searches based on index test and target condition?
• Can English-speaking reviewers correctly identify foreignlanguage articles that meet eligibility criteria for a systematic review of management for fibromyalgia?
• Can evidence-based journal clubs promote knowledge translation in real-world clinical settings?
• Can exercise prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women? Meta-analysis of (R) CT's on the effects of endurance and strength training on bone mass
• Can generalizability be considered in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy?
• Can Indirect comparisons be improved using individual patient data?
• Can large language models replace humans in the systematic review process? Evaluating GPT-4’s efficacy in screening and extracting data
• Can Qualitative Comparative Analysis help us to identify important components of complex interventions?
• Can rapid-learning health systems accommodate individual participant data (IPD)? An example of the timelines involved in an IPD meta-analysis
• Can summarising trials of public health strategies by camparator design improve interpretation?
• Can systematic reviewing be adapted for hypothesis testing in medicine and biology?
• Can systematic reviews provide the evidence needed for making regulatory decisions? An FDA's statistician's perspective
• Can the Cochrane RCT classifier be used to speed up screening for a qualitative evidence synthesis? A retrospective evaluation
• Can the impact of an erroneous review be corrected?
• Can trial quality be reliably assessed from a trial publication?
• Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
• Can we GRADE chimeric-antigen-receptor T-cell therapies? The guideline development process of the Italian Society of Hematology.
  
• Can we make patient versions of guidelines more applicable to patients and the public?
• Can we reduce the workload of systematic reviews without compromising quality? A new platform to accelerate search and study identification
• Can we trust patient reported outcomes in the absence of blinding? Preliminary results from an analysis of trials included in systematic reviews of interventions for chronic conditions
• Can we trust preprints when we need the newest data during outbreak response? An evaluation of mpox preprints
• Can we trust the conclusion in peer-review publications? A review of quality improvement intervention studies
• Can we trust what we read on reviews abstracts of interventions for low back pain? A methodological review
• Can we use GRADE to create new diagnostic criteria for a condition? An application of GRADE principles for establishing diagnostic criteria for a disease
• Can we use non-research papers in systematic reviews to assess organisational processes? Lessons from a review on immunization advisory committees
• Can we use overviews to reduce research waste? An example from a population-level intervention overview
• Can we use results from a broader study population for conclusions about the treatment effect in a subpopulation of interest?
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Education and Training Project 2004-05
• Canadian Cochrane Centre Partners Forum: strengthening partnerships to increase evidence-based decision-making
• Canadian practitioners’ opioid-related treatment practices: A scoping review
• Cannabis for medical purposes and Chronic Pain: Recommendations of an evidence based clinical practice guideline from the McMaster University
• Capacity building and health system strengthening through Cochrane sensitization and training in the Caribbean
• Capacity building for evidence-based child health through digital platforms
• Capacity building in conducting systematic reviews
• Capacity building in Evidence Based Child Health: six years’ experience
• Capacity building in systematic reviews in South Asia: a South-North collaboration to expand the production and translation of synthesized evidence
• Capacity building to improve the quality and reproducibility of search methods
• Capacity building to produce useful evidence: Who sets the agenda?
• Capacity-sharing for improved filtering of information for decision-making in the African context
• Capitalizing on global partnerships to build evidence-based practice expertise, synthesis and implementation in nursing academia
  
• Capturing the broader impact of research and innovation: Outcome mapping in a product research and development project
• Capturing the primary outcome for Cochrane reviews of deprescribing specific medications: an overview of Cochrane reviews