• Challenges in assessing interventions in ICT based cognitive remediation for people with schizophrenia - preparing a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Challenges in conducing systematic reviews for diagnostic and prognostic testing in genomics and personalized medicine (GPM)
• Challenges in conducting a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy of genetic test: an example of the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia
• Challenges in conducting a systematic review of predictors and moderators of outcome: an example in psychological therapies for OCD
• Challenges in conducting an overview of reviews evaluating diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty screening tools: a practical example
• Challenges in conducting Cochrane systematic reviews in traditional Chinese medicine: how has the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group helped?
• Challenges in conducting economic evaluation informed by Cochrane Reviews: case study of adherence in epilepsy
• Challenges in conducting priority setting exercises for Cochrane entities
• Challenges in designing and delivering prognostic factor systematic reviews: experience from three reviews
• Challenges in disseminating review findings: a case study
• Challenges in SDM education: the heterogeneity of SDM training programs and the search for consensus on core competencies
• Challenges in synthesising evidence from implementation and dissemination studies: experience from two systematic scoping reviews
• Challenges in the assessment of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• Challenges in the methodology and implementation of an exemplar Cochrane Review of prognostic factor studies
• Challenges in using RoB2: worked example from a systematic review of remote therapies for alcohol and drug misuse.
• Challenges of assessing the quality of scientific evidence for public health interventions
• Challenges of complex interventions: a worked example
• Challenges of conducting a systematic review on the prevalence of rare diseases
• Challenges of coordinating large-scale systematic reviews
• Challenges of developing a geographic search filter to identify randomized controlled trials in Africa: finding the optimal balance between sensitivity and precision
• Challenges of developing a geographic search filter to identify randomized controlled trials in Africa: finding the optimal balance between sensitivity and precision
• Challenges of overviews of reviews and how to overcome them, informed by a public health overview
• Challenges of systematic reviews in the field of traditional Chinese medicine
• Challenges to the implementation of the New Guidelines for Breast Cancer Early Detection in Brazil
• Challenges to validity in two applications of network meta-analysis to complex social interventions
• Challenges using patient reported outcomes for functional abilities and quality of life in older adults
• Challenges with integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence through mixed methods systematic reviews
• Change score or follow-up score? An empirical evaluation of the impact of choice of mean difference estimates
• Changes in knowledge and utilisation of the Cochrane Collaboration by primary health care workers in Argentina from 2002 to 2005
• Changes in randomized controlled trial reporting quality over time: A systematic review of pediatric journals from China
• Changes in treatment over time of women diagnosed with breast cancer: an opportunity to reduce overtreatment
• Changing patterns of clinical trial activity in Australia: 2005-2013
• Changing physician practice patterns: methods for implementing clinical research and guidelines
• Changing practice: encouraging the use of ECV for women with a breech presentation at term
• Changing Professional Behaviour: An Updated Overview of Systematic Reviews
• Changing professional behaviour: an updated overview of systematic reviews
• Characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on hypertension treatments: a cross-sectional study
• Characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on stroke treatments: a cross-sectional study
• Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster-randomized trials in children: an assessment using the CONSORT statement for CRTs (CONSORT-CRT)
• Characteristics of authorships in oral health group systematic reviews
• Characteristics of clinical studies used objective performance criteria
• Characteristics of clinical trials on drug-drug interaction registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov from 2005 to 2015
• Characteristics of cross-over trials in dentistry and oral health reviews
• Characteristics of Meta-analyses and Included Trials Associated with Data Contribution to Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
• Characteristics of meta-analyses submitted to a general medical journal
• Characteristics of network meta-analysis reviews from Cochrane
• Characteristics of physicians who receive large payments from industry and the accuracy of their disclosures in concurrent publications
• Characteristics of published scoping reviews: a scoping review of scoping reviews
• Characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in Latin America and the Caribbean’s (LAC) in 2010
• Characteristics of randomized trials that have been extended by linkage to routinely collected data: results of a scoping review of the published literature
• Characteristics of realist synthesis reviews: a systematic mapping review of realist reviews
• Characteristics of studies included for HTA reports
• Characteristics of the authors of acupuncture related Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Characteristics of the reporting of funding by trial authors: a systematic survey of 200 randomized controlled trials
• Characteristics, reporting, and methods of trials included in time-to-event meta-analyses of systematic reviews: A meta-epidemiological review
• CHARMS and PROBAST at your fingertips: a template for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews of predictive models
• ChatGPT and large language models for systematic review tasks: What are the opportunities for improvement?
• Checking important journals for important trials: does this make sense?
• Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews
• Checking the checkboxes: A review of the appropriateness of performance measures
• Checking the checkboxes: How to critically appraise performance measures
• Checking the methodological quality of clinical studies about voice and larynx published in two Brazilian and two international papers indexed by Medline
• CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction in systematic Reviews of clinical prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS)
• Checklist for Neurological Review Article
• Checklist for the application of the consensus approach in the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
• Checklist of the methodological elaboration of an evidence-based health policy brief
• Chemotherapy in high-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (RCTS).
• Chest computed tomography for the diagnosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): evidence and effectiveness
• Child labour and health: a scoping review
• Children with asthma and steroid treatment. A meta-ethnography synthesis on how Cochrane reviews findings have been considered in international guidelines
• Chilean guideline for budget impact analysis
• CHIMERAS showed better inter-rater reliability and inter-consensus reliability than GRADE in grading quality of evidence: a randomized controlled trial
• China’s conflict of interest management in clinical research: a literature review
• Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality for five leading Chinese medical journals
• Chinese Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews of Cochrane Library: A nationwide survey of utilization in Taiwan
• Chinese Consumer Involvement in Evidence-Based Medicine: Current Status and Strategies
• Chinese doctors’ awareness of evidence-based medicine and acquisition of evidence-based practice skills: the status quo
• Chinese herb medicine for the pregnancy-induced hypertension
• Chinese involvement in the Cochrane Collaboration
• Chinese involvement of EBM and Cochrane activities
• Chinese medicinal herbs for acute bronchitis
• Chinese medicinal herbs for Chronic Hepatitis B: A systematic review
• Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza
• Chinese proprietary herbal medicines for common cold — a rapid recommendation which revealed huge research waste in the field of TCM
• Chinese traditional medicine Dan Shen compound for acute myocardial infarction
• Choice of summary statistics in Cochrane reviews
• Choose, consider or avoid: which qualitative synthesis methods match my Cochrane Effects Review?
• Chronic pain: systematic review of cognitive behavioural treatments
• Chronically sick to chronically well: a realistic and concrete way to do things differently with evidence in the Canadian system!
• CINeMA: a web application to evaluate the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis results
• CINeMA: a web application to evaluate the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis results
• Citation bias in imaging research: are studies with higher diagnostic accuracy estimates cited more often?
• Citation of Cochrane systematic reviews in newspapers
• Citation rates of Cochrane reviews versus non-Cochrane reviews
• Citation rates of systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension and blood pressure
• Citation screening by medical students using paper, computer, web and mobile technologies: a pilot randomised controlled trial
• Citation screening by medical students using paper, computer, web and mobile technologies: a pilot randomised controlled trial
• Citation screening in systematic reviews: two approaches, two authors and time taken (SWAR-1 (Study Within A Review 1))
• Citations of Cochrane nutrition reviews in guidelines: appraising the “payback” on investment in nutrition evidence synthesis
• Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
• Clarifying the abstracts of systematic reviews
• Class 'Inclusion, Medicine and Disability' in faculties of medicine, to learn from patients and train doctors to know about diversity
• Classification criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome
• Classification of consistency across guidelines: A model for informing patients about global guidance
• Classification of FEE studies in NHS EED according to ICD-10 category
• Classification of methods for evaluation of treatment selection markers: A systematic review
• Classifying non-randomised studies (NRS) and assessing the risk of bias for a systematic review
• Classifying questions and matching them against forms of evidence: a new tool to better connect evidence demand and supply.
• Classmate: A trainer’s toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks
• Climate change and infectious disease - a rapid scoping review to support public health preparedness in Canada
• Climate change impact on human migration: mapping the evidence
• Climate change in focus: Incorporating evidence synthesis methodology into environmental decision making
• Clinical and imaging diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis in adults: A best-practice implementation project
• Clinical characteristics of children with COVID-19: a systematic review
• Clinical checklist: sensitivity and specificity
• Clinical decision support system: an effective pathway to promote shared decision making between clinician and patient.
• Clinical experts are an important resource in systematic reviews of the epidemiology of rare diseases
• Clinical guidelines as a source of evidence-based information about the appropriate use of OTC drugs
• Clinical policies for optimal care: variation in content and evidence cited
• Clinical practice guideline: Dental care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa
• Clinical Practice Guidelines for traditional Korean medicine (TKM) for facial palsy: an evidence-based approach
• Clinical practice guidelines in India: quality appraisal and the use of evidence in their development
• Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: two guideline development programs in France and Canada
• Clinical practice guidelines: how they are produced in Poland
• Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Spanish Situation
• Clinical practice guidelinesmanuals and toolkits. Are they different among languages, countries and developers?
• Clinical research evidence of the association between depression and diabetes: A systematic literature review
• Clinical research in occupational trauma in Germany: Current status, current needs and future demands
• Clinical studies in German health care journals: publication quality and assessment
• Clinical study report use within Cochrane Reviews: recent developments within Cochrane
• Clinical teachers' attitudes towards the efficacy of evidence-based medicine workshop and self-reported ability in evidence-based practice in Iran
• Clinical toss-ups: in defense of resource-preserving shared decision-making
• Clinical trial registries and ethics review boards: the results of a survey by the Fichtre Project
• Clinical trial registry searching: do Cochrane protocol search methods match good practice?
• Clinical trials in perinatal-neonatal medicine: Outcome of Abstracts Submitted for Annual Conference of The American Pediatric Society and The Society for Pediatric Research - Limited to Randomized Control Trials in Neonatology
• Clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine need core outcome sets
• Clinical trials publication rate in Spain: how far have we come?
• Clinical use evidence summaries (CUES) for knowledge translation: preliminary survey of primary care clinicians on the development of focused clinical question and answer summaries based on Cochrane reviews
• Clinical utility of overviews on adverse events of pharmacological interventions
• Clinician understanding of and attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union
• Clinician-led and consumer engaged: clinical ethics review for healthcare quality improvement and implementation studies
• Clinician’s basic knowledge on patient safety in China
• Clinicians need evidence that is based upon research conducted with relevant patient groups: The example of antidepressant prescribing in primary care.
• Clinicians’ and patients’ research priorities: a scoping review
• Closing the gap - identifying reports of randomized trials in EMBASE for inclusion in CENTRAL
• Closing the gap between ‘mean effect size’ and data desired by decision makers—exploring heterogeneity in complex interventions
• Closing the health equity gap: a social determinants focus for population level Cochrane Reviews
• Closing the research-practice gap using integrated knowledge translation: a practical webinar series
• Cluster randomised trials in Cochrane reviews of infectious diseases
• Cluster randomised trials produced similar results to individually randomised trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression
• Cluster randomised trials: a study to help recommendations for better reporting in Cochrane reviews
• Cluster randomized trial of an active, multifaceted information dissemination intervention based on The WHO Reproductive Health Library (RHL) to change obstetric practices
• Clustering physical interventions in network meta-analyses
• Co-creation in developing international guidelines for the management of kidney disease
• Co-design, co-production and acceptability of smartphone mood monitoring app for young people with bipolar disorder
• Co-design, production, and usability testing of a communication toolbox for delivering evidence-based health information to older adults and their caregivers
• Co-designing outcomes for a review on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions: Are we failing our young people?
• Co-producing a Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis: applying real-world perspectives to full-text screening
• Co-Producing a resource for intervention development: The Nature on Prescription Handbook.
• Co-producing new quality of life and well-being questionnaires with people with dementia
• Co-producing with children and young people on a meta-ethnography on experiences of chronic pain, treatments and services
• Co-production in action: improving the relevance of a Cochrane Review on person-centred care
• Co-production with family carers in Belfast – moving beyond the tick box!
• Co-publication of systematic reviews from the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group
• Cochrane 'Packaging and Push' in action: dishing up digestible nutrition evidence
• Cochrane 2.0: Tweeting and blogging to disseminate child health evidence
• Cochrane Airways reviews: can they make a difference?
• Cochrane and MAGIC breaking down silos in a digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem: results from pilot-studies on stroke, kidney diseases, musculoskeletal complaints and oral health
• Cochrane and MAGIC partnership: results from musculoskeletal pilot project on arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease
• Cochrane and nursing: are needs being met?
• Cochrane and Wikipedia: disseminating evidence
• Cochrane and World Health Organization “Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action”
• Cochrane as a knowledge commons: an institutional analysis
• Cochrane Back Group quality items and bias in back pain trials
• Cochrane Brazil Facebook: reaching people through social media
• Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro Affiliate’s activities and the mission of promoting Cochrane in Brazil
• Cochrane Canada Live: webinars to benefit the Collaboration and beyond
• Cochrane Canada webinars: building capacity around systematic reviews
• Cochrane CENTRAL & CAFÉ (communication access framework and evidence): Locating intervention studies on clinical communication for communicatively vulnerable populations
• Cochrane CENTRAL and CAFE (Communication Access Framework and Evidence): creating a code set of factors in the ICF in interventions for both patients and providers
• Cochrane Classmate: a trainer's toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks
• Cochrane ClassMate: a trainer’s toolkit to support and enhance evidence production training activities with interactive micro-tasks
• Cochrane Clinical Answers – content expansion priorities and subject coverage
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: a product retrospective
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: a retrospective of the past five years
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: Enabling the evidence to make a difference
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: facilitating the use of Cochrane Reviews within the clinical decision-making pathway
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: filtering the information overload for better clinical decisions
• Cochrane Clinical Answers: making the evidence matter
• Cochrane Commercial Sponsorship Policy: an implementation workshop
• Cochrane Consumers and Communication: Integrating knowledge translation throughout the review cycle
• Cochrane consumers and data sharing of clinical trials - a survey; IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trials data) Observatory
• Cochrane Croatia’s collaboration with partner patient/consumer organisations: use of Cochrane evidence, expectations, and opinions on data sharing
• Cochrane Crowd and Classmate: new ways of working and learning together to produce health evidence
• Cochrane Crowd for all: an introduction to Cochrane Crowd's Learning Zone
• Cochrane Crowd: new ways of involving consumers and patients in producing health evidence
• Cochrane Crowd: Using citizen science to meet the challenge of information overload in evidence production
• Cochrane Crowd: using citizen science to meet the challenge of information overload in evidence production
• Cochrane Database utilization analysis: A 10 year trend of one medical center in Taiwan
• Cochrane Editors as authors: how is the potential conflict of interest managed?