Jump to navigation
Top menu
Cochrane.org
Colloquium
Cochrane
Colloquium Abstracts
Trusted evidence.
Informed decisions.
Better health.
Index
Community and home-based exercise for the prevention and treatment of hypertension
Community based approach to newborn resuscitation and its impact on survival: a systematic review
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations: a Cochrane systematic review
Community health interventions: are they effective?
Community mobilization for safe motherhood: a systematic review
Community perceptions of safe motherhood in Ethiopia: a qualitative needs assessment activity informing the educational component of an intervention study
Community perspectives on the accessibility and relevance of research evidence on dietary supplements for cancer
Comparative analysis of clinical trials in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression
Comparative analysis of the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews for treatment of rotating cuff dysfunctions
Comparative detection and enumeration methods of diarrhoea causing E. coli in drinking water: Systematic review
Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for subacromial shoulder conditions: A network meta-analysis
Comparative efficacy and safety of long-term oral anticoagulation for vascular events
Comparative efficacy of anti-hypertensive agents in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis
Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A Network meta-analysis
Comparative evaluation of information products regarding cancer screening from German-speaking cancer organizations
Comparative meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: A review and comparison of currently proposed approaches
Comparative Review of Self-Administered Questionnaires in Vertigo and Dizziness
Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices.
Comparative safety and efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: An individual patient data network meta-analysis
Comparing a systematic review with a Cochrane protocol (submitted, not published) on the subject of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) and heart failure
Comparing adverse events data from systematic reviews and consumer social media posts
Comparing apples and oranges? A Bayesian meta-regression of effect estimates from non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials
Comparing atypical antipsychotic agents using mixed treatment comparisons meta-regression
Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for network meta-analysis: An empirical study
Comparing different types of exercises for fall prevention in older people living in the community: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Comparing different ways of presenting evidence and recommendations in guidelines using the randomized link method
Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple interventions with network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple interventions workshop 1: introduction to indirect comparison and network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple interventions workshop 2: estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple interventions workshop: Estimating treatment effects and evaluating the evidence from network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple treatments 1: intervention review or overview?
Comparing multiple treatments 1: Overview or intervention review?
Comparing multiple treatments 2: Statistical methods for network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple treatments 2: statistical methods for network meta-analysis
Comparing multiple treatments: an introduction to overviews of reviews
Comparing multiple treatments: statistical methods for network meta-analysis – Part 2
Comparing multiple treatments: — intervention review or overview – Part 1
Comparing prevention efficacy of acute mountain sickness between different medicines: a network meta-analysis
Comparing preventive strategies in hypertension: risk prediction or blood pressure level? Insight from a meta-analysis based on individual patient data
Comparing quality assessments of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in nutrition using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: Betwixt and between
Comparing recommendations in two national guidelines on dementia using the same scientific evidence
Comparing risk of bias between prospectively and retrospectively registered trials in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)
Comparing the Impact of the Cochrane library in Web of Science and Scopus
Comparing the performance of three tools for semi-automated abstract screening when conducting systematic reviews: Abstrackr, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst
Comparing the practice of study classification and study inclusion in different systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
Comparing user preferences and understanding for two formats of evidence profiles. A randomized trial
Comparing various approaches for network meta-analysis regarding effect estimation and evaluation of inconsistency
Comparison between Autocad and Draftsight in data extraction
Comparison between randomized clinical trials designating an outcome as primary and those designating the same outcome as secondary
Comparison of several systematic review process software tools among health care professionals: A questionnaire based survey.
Comparison of acute and chronic airway diseases in the Cochrane Library: implications for clinicians and researchers
Comparison of adverse effects data derived from different study designs
Comparison of alternative evidence summary and presentation formats in clinical guideline development: a mixed-method study
Comparison of AMSTAR 2 with ROBIS in systematic reviews including randomized and non-randomized studies
Comparison of clinical practice guidelines between western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine on 18 diseases in China: an evidence-based literature review
Comparison of conference abstracts and full-text articles of randomized controlled trials in the field of pain: reporting quality and agreement in results
Comparison of Copas selection model for publication bias and trimand-fill
Comparison of current and previous approaches to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews
Comparison of descriptions of blinding in trial protocols and the published reports
Comparison of diagnostic test accuracy estimates using the Multiple Thresholds Model based on complete and published cut-off data with a bimodal reporting pattern
Comparison of different MEDLINE search engines
Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study of COVID-19 trials
Comparison of evidence-based answer retrieval from four bedside information sources: a randomized controlled trial
Comparison of four methods for meta-analysis of survival data
Comparison of holding chambers and nebulisers for beta-agonists in acute asthma, (a systematic review)
Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health related interventions
Comparison of linguistic characteristics of plain language summaries of systematic reviews between medical and non-medical sciences: a cross-sectional study
Comparison of Medline and Embase retrieval of RCTs of the effects of educational interventions on asthma-related outcomes
Comparison of methods of grading bodies of evidence and strength of recommendations used by clinical practice guideline groups
Comparison of methods of handling missing data in individual patient data meta-analyses; an empirical example on antibiotics in children with acute otitis media
Comparison of methods to evaluate the quality of evidence in resource studies: a pilot study
Comparison of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes to aid decision making
Comparison of Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) as risk of bias assessment tools for cohort studies
Comparison of NNT statistics, impact numbers and epidemiological effect measures
Comparison of outcome reporting in clinical study reports, journal publications and registry reports in the field of telecardiology
Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes specified in registry entries with journal publications
Comparison of protocols to published articles for randomised controlled trials
Comparison of RCTs and observational studies: implications for benefit assessment in health care and health policy decision-making in light of effect size, PICO and certainty of evidence
Comparison of results from different imputation techniques of missing data in an anti-obesity drug trial
Comparison of RIGHT and AGREE reporting checklists for healthcare practice guidelines
Comparison of selection models in meta-analysis
Comparison of single versus double data extraction: a pilot study
Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study
Comparison of statistical tests on bias in meta-analysis with binary outcome
Comparison of tap water and saline for wound cleansing: an overview of systematic reviews
Comparison of test performance of liquid-based versus conventional Pap smears to detect cervical cancer precursors
Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist and Newcastle Ottawa Scale as risk-of-bias tools
Comparison of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics updated Quality Criteria Checklist and Cochrane's ROB 2.0 as risk of bias tools
Comparison of the attention of reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in recent seven years
Comparison of the attention of trial registration in selective countries in the Asia-Pacific region
Comparison of the attention paid to reporting guidelines and trial registration in nursing journals in the last three years
Comparison of the attention paid to trial registration in the Asia-Pacific region in the last three years
Comparison of the Cochrane Neonatal Group systematic reviews and Danish guidelines for newborns
Comparison of the diagnostic criteria and efficacy evaluation criteria in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese herbal medicine
Comparison of the methodological quality of RCTs using RoB-2 and JBI tools: performing of medical students
Comparison of the priority action areas in oral health with the evidence available in The Cochrane Library
Comparison of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies in the Assessment of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Comparison of the tests of homogeneity based on odds ratio and risk difference for interaction
Comparison of trends in study designs types in LILACS and PubMed in the last decade
Comparison of two different search strategies in identifying literature for a diagnostic test accuracy review of Down's Syndrome screening
Comparison of two experiences of development of healthcare quality indicators
Competencies needed for patient involvement in patient-oriented research: report of a scoping review of the literature
Competency profiles for Evidence-Informed Policy (EIPM): a rapid review
Competing events and in-hospital follow-up: issues to be aware of
Compiling evidence to guide policy decisions on the introduction of the influenza vaccine in Kenya
Complementary and alternative medicine in stroke rehabilitation—a systematic review of systematic reviews
Complementary medicine use for arthritis patients in Korea: a systematic review of prevalence studies
Complementary medicine use in the adult congenital heart community: what evidence do patients need and want?
Completeness of outcome specification across Cochrane Systematic Reviews of three common eye conditions: time to be more explicit!
Completeness of outcomes description reported in low-back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane Reviews
Completeness of reporting of exercise training interventions in cancer randomized controlled trials published after 2010
Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke: a systematic review
Completeness of reporting of rapid reviews of primary studies according to journal publication status using PRISMA and PRISMA for Abstracts
Completing a full systematic review in under two weeks: processes, barriers and facilitators
Completing A Systematic Review in Diabetes: The Fish Oil Supplementation in Type 2 Diabetes Story
Completing the first Cochrane overview of stroke reviews: experiences of the Cochrane Stroke Group
Complex interventions and composite outcomes in Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis: double challenge in i-WIP IPD
Complex interventions and evidence translation to specific contexts: how additional analytic approaches can meet the needs of decision-makers
Complex interventions require description beyond methodological items to allow clinical replicability: the REREP study of randomized controlled trials in rehabilitation
Complex interventions required to comprehensively educate allied health practitioners on evidence-based practice
Complex reviews 1: Issues and challenges in developing review questions for complex interventions
Complex reviews 2: Unpacking implementation factors and practical approaches to data extraction, analysis and synthesis
Complex reviews 3: Applying the GRADE criteria and presenting findings using ‘Summary of Findings’ tables
Complexity in public health interventions - stakeholders' perspective: a qualitative analysis
Complying with Cochrane's Conflict of Interest policy
Comprehensive author training for improving risk of bias assessment
Comprehensive Meta Analysis - a computer program
Comprehensive overview of conduct and reporting of cross-sectional studies on STROBE statement in public health field of China
Comprehensive overview of methods and reporting of meta-analyses of test accuracy
Comprehensive searching for systematic reviews: A comparison of database performance
Comprehensive systematic review of complex interventions facilitated by means of new software program
Comprehensive systematic review training programme
Computed vs. effective intercoder reliability for systematic reviews
Computer-aided diagnosis for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis
Computer-based health information management in the developing World
Computerized decision support system: an effective pathway to filter information overloads to improve clinical decisions
Computerized protocols for diagnostic test ordering: reliability, cost and patient satisfaction
Computers Are Your Friend? Using Artificial Intelligence in Rapid Reviews
Concept and design of a cluster-randomized trial testing the impact of disseminating evidence-based recommendations in non-communicable diseases in Colombia
Concept for teaching medical students evidence-based and Cochrane methods
Conceptualisation of different types of 'evidence' as used and understood by a broad range of public health stakeholders
Conceptualizing the reporting of living systematic reviews
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic analysis
Concordance of data between conference abstracts and full reports
Concordance of reporting of primary outcomes in abstracts and full text of randomized clinical trials: Is there an outcome reporting bias?
Conditional cash transfers and the ethical dimension
Conduct and dissemination of epidemiological systematic reviews in Latin America and the Caribbean: Pitfalls and lessons learned
Conducting a broad organisational systematic review: examining the effect of sensory environments on health-related outcomes of hospital patients
Conducting a Cochrane Methods Peer Review – Good Practice and Common Challenges
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative tuberculosis treatment adherence studies: a reflection on the process
Conducting a needs assessment for Cochrane learning
Conducting a qualitative evidence synthesis of trial-sibling studies to inform an intervention review: experiences and preliminary results from two Cochrane Reviews
Conducting A Systematic Overview: Quality Improvement of Diabetes Treatment
Conducting a systematic review in Latin America: difficulties in searching studies and lessons learned
Conducting co-registered Cochrane and Campbell reviews: the experiences of a review on mass media interventions
Conducting High Quality Scoping Reviews: Challenges and Solutions
Conducting multiple living systematic reviews rapidly without compromising quality is possible with an innovative approach: L·OVE COVID-19 initiative
Conducting network meta-analysis of treatments for bladder pain syndrome in adults: benefits and challenges
Conducting network meta-analysis with sparse data and many interventions: recent examples and the issues they raise
Conducting overviews of reviews: lessons learned since 2006
Conducting Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Why, when and how?
Confidence in qualitative synthesised findings: A principled and pragmatic critique of ConQual and GRADE-CERQual
Confidence interval estimation following trial sequential analysis: a comparison of methods using cancer trials
Confidence regarding evidence-based practice in outpatient department nurses
Configurational ‘qualitative’ synthesis for evidence-based policy and practice: breaking down the qualitative/quantitative divide
Conflict of interest among clinical practice guidelines authors
Conflict of interest disclosure and management in Japanese clinical practice guidelines
Conflict of interest disclosure in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
Conflict of interest policies for clinical practice guideline organizations do not measure up to IOM standards
Conflict of interest policies in practice guideline development: a systematic survey of published guidance
Conflicting guidelines for screening mammography: Influence of author’s specialty and conflicts of interest
Conflicts of interest and recommendations in clinical guidelines, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: methodological systematic review
Conflicts Of Interest and Risk of Bias In Systematic Reviews On Interventions For 6 Common Diagnoses in Primary Care
Confounding, effect modification and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations
Connecting evidence-based guidelines with clinical practice: strategies and lessons learned across a large USA integrated healthcare delivery system
Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
CONSENSYS: an instrument to support CONtextual SENsitivity in SYStematic reviews
Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders
Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: a series of systematic reviews
Conservative treatment of stress incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
Consideration of dose comparability in Cochrane reviews on antidepressants
Consideration of patient-relevant outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Considerations for Establishing a New, Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journal: A Partially Completed Protocol
Considered judgement in evidence-based guidelines development
Considering aspects of equity and diversity in the assessment of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: preliminary results
Considering importance of outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline
Considering scope in the planning and completion of systematic reviews
Considering the weight of loops for assessing the certainty of indirect evidence of network meta-analysis.
Consistency of adverse events from literature and real world state monitoring data
Consistency of outcome and statistical reporting of time-to-event data: the impact on Cochrane Reviews and meta-analyses in epilepsy
Consistency of protocol and safety data reporting in clinical trial registrations and corresponding publications of interventions involving 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
Consolidating tools for assessment of risk of bias for individual participant data meta-analysis: a case study.
CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials (CENT) guidelines
CONSORT for Abstract reporting items by subscription and open access (OA) journals
CONSORT for Abstracts: Guidance to improve the quality of reporting of randomized trials in conference and journal abstracts
CONSORT for improving the quality of reports of randomized trials: a large scale survey of PubMed articles
CONSORT guidelines for reporting abstracts of randomized trials: a survey of its impact on high impact journals
CONSORT in China
Constancy of relative indices of treatment effect across different definitions of response derived from continuous scales: secondary analyses of individual-patient trial database of second-generation antipsychotics
Constrains of conducting a Cochrane review in a resource limited setting
Constraints on academic freedom in industry-initiated clinical trials
Constructing an overview of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
Construction of a clinical pathway development working group
Construction of minimum data set for core outcome set in real-world settings: A data-driven approach
Consulting with young people to inform systematic reviews: An example from a review on the effects of schools on health
Consumer access to health information on the internet: a public health issue?
Consumer health information providers and Cochrane reviews
Consumer impact on arthritis research
Consumer information on prostate cancer screening
Consumer involvement - overcoming the hurdles
Consumer Involvement 101: producing Cochrane evidence with consumers
Consumer involvement in The Cochrane Collaboration
Consumer involvement in the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group
Consumer involvement in the editorial processes of health research journals: how we can learn from one another and embed good practice
Consumer Involvement in the Interpretation, Dissemination and Implementation of the Results of Systematic Reviews: 4 Collaborative Review Group Perspectives.
Consumer involvement: All talk and no action?
Consumer needs for medicines information: a role for Cochrane?
Consumer participation in resource allocation decisions: a systematic review
Consumer participation in The Cochrane Collaboration - comparison of two models
Consumer participation on a Cochrane Review team
Consumer priority survey: bridging the gap between producers and users of systematic reviews
Consumer Representation in Complementary Medicine
Consumer representation on the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group
Consumer support and education beyond national borders: A case study
Consumer support and education beyond national borders: phase 3
Consumer training - is it valuable and worthwhile?
Consumer-led knowledge translation: leveraging patient networks to disseminate Cochrane Reviews
Consumers and Physician United for the best Health Care: a model for building a national advocacy coalition
Consumers Setting Priorities for Cochrane Review Groups
Consumers speak out! What do we want results reporting to look like?
Consumers United for Evidence-based health care (CUE): a model for building a national consumer advocacy coalition
Consumers United for Evidence-based Healthcare (CUE): Development of a consumer advocacy coalition in the United States
Consumers' roles in topics identification In systematic reviews
Consumers: roles, tasks, level of involvement and impact in Cochrane systematic reviews
Content analysis of rehabilitation definitions for research purposes
Contextual heterogeneity: unlocking local relevance from global evidence
Contextualisation of clinical practice guidelines: An innovative approach for the primary healthcare of chronic musculoskeletal pain in South Africa
Contextualising Informed Health Choices primary school resources for use in different countries
Contextualizing evidence-based nurse-led peri-discharge interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions using GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework: A Delphi study
Contextualizing the findings from systematic reviews to inform health system transformations
Continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for treating respiratory distress in neonates in low- and middle-income countries
Contributing CENTRAL database and disseminating clinical evidence on Traditional Chinese Medicine in China: managing a better way out
Contribution of checking reference lists to systematic reviews
Contribution of EMBASE search in meta-analyses of diagnostic studies
Contribution of Indian Cochrane authors to evidence synthesis
Contribution of Indian randomised controlled trials in Cochrane Reviews
Pages
« first
‹ previous
…
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
…
next ›
last »
Authors
About