• Assessing the impact of bibliographical support on the quality of medical care in patients admitted to an internal medicine service
• Assessing the impact of climate change on Eastern equine encephalitis virus in Canada.
• Assessing the impact of information retrieval in postgraduate medical education
• Assessing the impact of missing participant data for continuous outcomes in systematic reviews on risk of bias
• Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the Leading Sports medicine Journals
• Assessing the methodological quality of systematic review: the AMSTAR II-DTA extension
• Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative evidence: What are the key criteria?
• Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative evidence: what are the key criteria?
• Assessing the number, characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan
• Assessing the optimal presentation of how patients value health outcomes (values and preferences): A qualitative user testing
• Assessing the prognostic power of prediction rules: A Users’ Guide to the medical literature
• Assessing the quality of a body of evidence: experiences with the GRADE approach
• Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies that use psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS in a novel area
• Assessing the quality of economic studies of health care-searching for an ideal instrument
• Assessing the quality of information recorded on trial registries
• Assessing the quality of non-randomised comparative studies: Our experience of using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool}
• Assessing the Quality of Primary Studies: Empirical Study of Meta-Analyses Published in Leading Journals
• Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials evaluating nonpharmacological treatments: a CheckList to Evaluate A Report of NonPharmacological Trial (CLEAR NPT)
• Assessing the Quality of Reporting Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
• Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: A Systematic Review of Checklists and Scales
• Assessing the quality of surveillance studies
• Assessing the quality of the evidence for preterm labor tocolysis trials
• Assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data: applying decision thresholds for binary data
• Assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participants in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis in autologous cell therapy for peripheral arterial disease
• Assessing the risk of confounding and selection bias in a systematic review that includes non-randomized studies (NRS)
• Assessing the risk of selection bias in a systematic review which includes non-randomised studies (NRS)
• Assessing the risk of within-study selective reporting in a systematic review which includes non-randomised studies (NRS)
• Assessing the success of blinding in randomized controlled trials
• Assessing the usability of ACROBAT-NRSI for studies of exposure and intervention in environmental health research
• Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches in rapid reviews
• Assessing the validity of an ultra-rapid review strategy: four case studies from oncology and public health
• Assessing trial quality by a short and a detailed list
• Assessment and management of burns pain at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital: A best-practice Implementation Project
• Assessment of attitudes towards participation, willingness to participate, and competence to participate in Randomized Controlled Trials: a cross-sectional qualitative and quantitative survey of psychiatric patients and key family members
• Assessment of dialysis technology:- a Cochrane systematic review comparing bicarbonate with acetate haemodialysis in ESRD
• Assessment of health equity considerations in WHO guidelines from 2014-2019: A cross-sectional survey
• Assessment of hospital capacities in patient safety in the Philippines
• Assessment of knowledge, skills and attitude of undergraduate students on evidence-based medicine
• Assessment of Language Bias and Indexing Bias Among Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
• Assessment of methodological limitations in qualitative evidence synthesis - pilot test of a new tool
• Assessment of methodological quality of adaptive clinical trials
• Assessment of methodological quality of clinimetric reviews: a systematic review
• Assessment of methodological quality of systematic reviews of China health policy
• Assessment of methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library about physical activity for chronic noncommunicable diseases
• Assessment of methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
• Assessment of non-pharmacological interventions to manage geriatric conditions using GRADE
• Assessment of publication bias based on clinical trial registrations
• ASSESSMENT OF PUBLICATION BIAS IN BREAST CANCER SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
• Assessment of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Registration Requirements in Nursing Journals: A Decade-Long Review
• Assessment of reporting of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) e-learning interventions in included studies of a Campbell systematic review
• Assessment of reporting quality in infertility journals
• Assessment of research quality in major infertility journals
• Assessment of risk of bias due to blinding for objective and subjective outcomes: an exploratory study of Cochrane Reviews
• Assessment of risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews
• Assessment of risk of bias in prognostic studies
• Assessment of Russian clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument
• Assessment of the Cochrane ‘Risk of bias’ tool: a pilot study
• Assessment of the completeness of reporting of methods in overviews of systematic reviews
• Assessment of the evidence for diagnostic tests and strategies: a systematic review of available tools
• Assessment of the exclusion criteria among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in dentistry: preliminary results of a pilot study
• Assessment of the methodological quality of reporting of randomized trials in Iranian dental journals
• Assessment of the methodological quality of reporting of randomized trials in Iranian healthcare journals
• Assessment of the methodology approach of systematic reviews of the literature in speech therapy degree students
• Assessment of the quality of clinical trials registries
• Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane Reviews of acupuncture
• Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT and STRICTA statements
• Assessment of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines using CheckUP list/tool
• Assessment of the reporting quality of Guidelines on Acupuncture and Moxibustion by using RIGHT Statement
• Assessment of the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology
• Assessment of the validity of a resources-saving selection procedure for non-English studies in systematic reviews
• Assessment of trial risk of bias among Cochrane reviews: A cross-sectional analysis
• Assessment of trial similarity and evidence consistency for indirect comparisons: preliminary results
• Assessment of trustworthiness has a significant impact on conclusions of Cochrane reviews
• Assessment of use and scope for use of IPD in a random sample of 100 reviews from the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth group
• AssociALi - Cochrane Associate Center: 18 months of activities dedicated to spreading a culture of EBM in Italy.
• Associated factors with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review of literature
• Association between alcohol intake, mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia: a dose-response meta-analysis
• Association between cigarette smoking prevalence and income level: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Association between industry affiliation and position on rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk: a cross sectional systematic review
• Association between personal financial conflicts of interest and recommendation of medical interventions: systematic review
• Association between risk of bias and the effects of interventions on mortality in randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine
• Association between the burden of behavioural risk factors and the number of primary studies included in Cochrane Systematic reviews
• Associations of hand-washing frequency with the incidence of illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Asthma self-management educational interventions versus usual care for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 controlled trials with 3304 patients
• At the beginning of a public health emergency what’s the utility of a conducting a systematic review?
• At what point in the life cycle of technologies are HTA reports requested? An analysis of 130 HTA reports in Argentina
• Attitude, expectation and needs of Cochrane knowledge translation volunteers in China
• Attitudes and implementation of shared decision making: the practicalities of consumer involvement among patients with chronic diseases
• Attitudes of guideline developers regarding machine learning and crowd sourcing for health-evidence synthesis
• Attitudes towards evidence based medicine among medical students of Universidad Nacional del Sur Medical School of Argentina
• Attributes of non-randomized studies associated with bias
• Attribution of credit in updated Cochrane reviews
• Attribution of multiple literature databases in systematic reviews for public health guideline development
• Attrition bias, the use of intention-to-treat and magnitude of treatment effects in randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study
• Audio-visual resources for key evidence-based medicine terms and concepts: findings from an e-learning project
• Audio-visual Resources of Testing Treatments (AVRTT)
• Audit of the use of clinical trial registries in Cochrane Intervention Reviews – preliminary results
• Australian Aboriginal children:- the randomised controlled trial and special populations
• Australian Living Guidelines for Management and Care of Patients with COVID-19 Infection
• Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) user survey results from 2009 and 2015
• Australian Physicians and EBM: Where are we now and Where to from here?
• Authenticity investigation and quality assessment of claimed randomized controlled trials on upper respiratory infection
• Author affiliation influences the presentation of benefits and harms of mammography screening in scientific articles
• Author instructions of haematology and oncology journals: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study
• Author self-classification of conference proceeding abstracts
• Author-led webinars as an education strategy for communicating systematic review evidence to a public-health audience
• Authoring and editing reviews through the new Cochrane Information Management System: an introductory workshop for review authors and editors
• Authors need guidance on creating clinical pathways in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews
• Authorship diversity among first authors of original investigation articles published in Revista Medica de Chile between 2017-2021
• Authorship diversity among systematic reviews in eyes and vision
• Authorship in reports of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic cross-sectional analysis
• Authorship trends in Cochrane reviews, 1996-2018
• Automated checking for human errors in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy
• Automated extraction of adverse drug reactions from Biomedical literature and FDA drug labels using machine learning
• Automated extraction of adverse drug reactions from biomedical literature and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels using machine learning
• Automated translation of abstracts using a free internet software package
• Automatic generation of comprehensive trial registers for specific health conditions
• Automatic information retrieval: citation tracking, deduplication and full-text fetching
• Automatic search strategy reformulation interface for systematic reviews
• Automating RCT identification can identify more than 99% of RCTs included in Cochrane reviews and could reduce manual screening by 77%
• Automation of scoping reviews: towards the efficiency of systematic reviews
• Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomised trials
• Avoiding informal recommendations: a framework for identifying and managing guideline statements
• Awareness and perception of dissemination bias in qualitative research: an exploratory study
• Awareness and use of evidence-based medicine databases and The Cochrane Library among physicians in Croatia
• Awareness and use of the Cochrane Library in internal medicine
• Awareness of The Cochrane Collaboration and The Cochrane Library in India
• Background section at Cochrane reviews: is it supported by systematic reviews?
• Bad examples of Interference In the conduct and publication of clinical research
• BADERI: an Internet-based platform to co-ordinate handsearching activities. Implementation and early results
• Balancing risks, harms and benefits in guideline development for pain management
• Banning smoking in vehicles with children: Lessons from a realist review
• Barriers and concerns in patient perceptions of shared decision making in China
• Barriers and facilitators in clinical pathway implementation: A literature review
• Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of interventions to prevent publication bias
• Barriers and facilitators to completing a Cochrane Review: a survey of authors in the African region
• Barriers and facilitators to handsearching: experience of the Brazilian Cochrane Centre
• Barriers and facilitators to implementation in dementia care: Findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis
• Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence in African healthcare: A content analysis
• Barriers and facilitators to postnatal care services utilisation in low- and middle-income countries: A Cochrane/EPOC systematic review
• Barriers and facilitators to sharing of individual patient data: a randomised controlled trial
• Barriers and methods to improve the use of Cochrane systematic reviews as a primary source of evidence in developing countries
• Barriers to and facilitators of evidence utilisation in healthcare in low-income settings: A qualitative systematic review
• Barriers to Cochrane Reviews of traditional medicine therapies: problems and potential solutions
• Barriers to implementation of evidence synthesis methods education for broad audiences
• Barriers to knowledge translation in Chinese doctors: a cross-sectional survey
• Barriers to meta-analysis of time-to-event data: a case study
• Barriers to participating in an HIV vaccine trial: a systematic review of qualitative studies
• Barriers to successful patient and public involvement on guideline panels and strategies to overcome them
• Baseline heterogeneity: a method to identify trials with bias arising from randomisation in meta-analyses
• Basics of meta-analysis
• Basics of meta-analysis
• Basics of meta-analysis
• Bayesian approach to meta-analysis. What can you gain?
• Bayesian approaches to meta-epidemiology
• Bayesian hierarchical models for complex meta-analyses using MCMCglmm in R
• Bayesian meta-analysis for quantifying treatment benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in neonates
• Bayesian meta-analysis hands-on in WinBUGS
• Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of interventions for Metabolic Syndrome
• Becoming a systematic review editor or peer reviewer for journals
• Becoming a systematic review editor or peer reviewer for journals
• Bed rest after subarachnoidal puncture to prevent headache: a systematic review
• Bed Rest after Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is it Any Good? A Systematic Review
• Begin here! A non-scientist’s guide to Evidence-Based Medicine, Cochrane and getting involved
• Behavior change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) promotion programs: a review of reviews to identify evidence gaps
• Behavioral medicine: providing another perspective of trial methodologies
• Behavioural therapy for chronic low back pain: how to interpret meta-analyses combining studies with multiple effect sizes?
• Behind the dementia headlines. A systematic look at the quality of reporting of dementia research in two UK national newspapers
• Benefit-harm assessment: evidence selection
• Best evidence for better practice: using social media to help nurses engage with evidence
• Best evidence for optimal aging: filter the information overload using the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal
• Best practice in editorial and organisational processes of Collaborative Review Groups (on behalf of QAG)
• Best practice in editorial policies, process, and publication
• Best practices in patient and stakeholder engagement
• Best-practice recommendations for using clinical trial registry records and published study protocols when conducting systematic reviews of interventions
• Best-practice statements in public-health guidelines
• Beta-test of a software program designed to facilitate systematic research reviews
• Betahistine for vertigo: a patient-professional partnership in action
• Better data extraction with Covidence and RevMan Web
• Better dissemination using Cochrane's Dissemination Checklist: Cochrane UK's experience
• Better reporting of health equity in randomised trials: CONSORT-Equity 2017
• Better values clarification methods for better decisions
• Better, faster, stronger: how to find tools to expedite the systematic review process
• Between-the-eyes adverse drug reactions: anecdotes as evidential gold standards
• Beyond Clinical Effectiveness - the Role of the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database in Providing Best Evidence for Health Care
• Beyond publication bias
• Beyond Statistical Significance: Investigating How Systematic Review Authors Communicate Meaningful Differences of Nonsignificant Results
• Beyond synthesis: developing a research program on knowledge translation and exchange
• Beyond Systematic Reviews: Other Possible Activities for the Cochrane Centres
• Beyond the RCT: how global patient organisations build research capacity and impact
• Beyond the systematic review: an example of a pilot decision analysis
• Bias adjustment in meta-analysis using expert opinions
• Bias associated with inadequate or unclear concealment of allocation in randomized osteoarthritis trials
• Bias associated with patient reported outcome measures
• Bias associated with selective crossover in randomised controlled trials
• Bias in case-control studies of screening effects
• Bias in measurement of adverse outcomes in non-randomised studies
• Bias In Meta-Analysis Due To Within Study Selective Reporting
• Bias in meta-epidemiological studies: an exchange of ideas
• Bias in surgical randomised trials: a meta-epidemiological study using laparoscopic versus open surgery as an example