• The quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in the field of bariatrics: a cross-sectional systematic survey
• The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials
• The quality of trials in quality improvement: Systematic review of risk of bias in diabetes studies
• The quality survey of campbell systematic reviews using AMSTAR
• The quantity and quality of evidence of pandemic
• The quest for trials on the efficacy of human vaccines: results of the handsearch of the Vaccine journal
• The QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews
• The Rapid Response Service: Synthesized research evidence to inform HIV-related programs, services, and policies in Ontario
• The rate of publication of randomized controlled trials is near-exponential (2.5 times increase/decade with >1.5 million computer listed trials). A new strategy is required to fufil the Cochrane Challenge
• The reality of unclear reported RCTs during selection period of systematic review: a telephone interview survey
• The reference standard for diagnostic imaging test accuracy
• The regulatory process for drug approval needs independent meta-analytical evidence: is Cochrane a possible candidate? The case of psychotropic medicines
• The rehabilitation definition for scientific research purposes by Cochrane Rehabilitation – first results
• The relation between heterogeneity in diagnostic accu­racy, prevalence and patient characteristics: an illustration with individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA)
• The relationship between risk of bias and effect size: randomized controlled trials
• The relationship between the external and internal validity of randomized controlled trials: a sample of hypertension trials from China
• The relationship between the type of rapid reviews and quality: in the background of COVID-19
• The relationship between volunteerism and well-being in Veteran and military populations: A scoping review
• The relevance of Cochrane reviews to cancer priorities in Iran
• The relevance of core outcome sets to systematic reviewers and guideline developers
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning
• The reliability and validity of estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized clinical trials
• The reliability, usability, and applicability of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS
• The reliability, usability, and utility of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS
• The reporting and impact of surgeons’ expertise in randomized controlled trials of total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
• The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analysis related to Interventions Published in the Leading Surgery Journals: Overview and Evidence Mapping
• The reporting characteristic of qualitative study: a review
• The reporting characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews Using PRISMA - An update of 2013-2016
• The reporting characteristics of WHO guidelines
• The reporting guideline for an acupuncture systematic review
• The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study
• The reporting of guideline dissemination and implementation in WHO guidelines
• The reporting of items generation and consensus in reporting guidelines: a cross sectional study
• The reporting of meta-epidemiological studies: A cross-sectional study
• The reporting of research design of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in abstracts of Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews
• The reporting on adverse events of drug intervention versus non-drug intervention in meta-analyses: can we do better presentation?
• The reporting quality of acupuncture-related infections in Korean literature: a systematic review of case studies
• The reporting quality of clinical guidelines in China based on Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT)
• The reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies in the urology literature
• The reporting quality of interventional animal experiments in Chinese journals based on the evaluated results of the Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines
• The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy published in high impact factor journals, based on the PRISMA-DTA statement
• The research about guidance of systematic review for clinical study
• The research progress of open-label placebo (OLP) and implications for future studies: a systematic survey
• The Research Status of eHealth Literacy
• The Research Status of the eHealth Literacy Scales
• The return of the register: the UKCCCR Register of Cancer Trials
• The REVEAL guidance for searching prior evidence for new trials
• The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials
• The rise and flaws of systematic reviews on climate change effects
• The rising importance of Cochrane systematic reviews in a Latin-American evidence-based journal
• The risk of bias in Iranian randomized controlled trials included in Cochrane Reviews
• The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomised clinical trial publications
• The risk-of-bias and standards of reporting of published randomized controlled trials of medical education (Med Ed) research
• The risk-of-bias profile of neonatal randomised-controlled trials in Cochrane reviews: are we better over the years?
• The RoB NMA Tool: development of a tool to assess risk of bias (RoB) in network meta-analysis (NMA)
• The ROB-ME (Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence) tool: a new tool for assessing reporting biases in evidence syntheses
• The RobotSearch RCT classifier: ready for use?
• The robustness of results on weight loss in trials on sibutramine – a comparison of results from unpublished study reports with the corresponding published reports
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC): review author experiences
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator: working practices
• The role of a new Cochrane systematic review examining community-wide interventions to increase physical activity
• The role of collaborative evidence networks in promoting and supporting evidence-based health care (EBHC) globally
• The role of Emotions in Patient and Public Involvement in health research; A literature review and practice recommendations
  
• The role of evidence in population based health outcome assessments by health authorities
• The role of evidence syntheses to support decision-making when evidence is rapidly evolving during a public health emergency
• The Role of feeding programs in achieving Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) One and Two: The School and Preschool feeding exemplar
• The role of health consumers in learning health systems: scoping the literature
• The role of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in systematic literature searches of Cochrane Reviews
• The role of meta-analysis in assessing the scientific basis of lasers in medicine
• The role of meta-regression in Cochrane reviews
• The role of patient involvement in the evidence-based research process: using systematic reviews to inform future research
• The role of patients reporting evidence. Pacientesonline: the site for patients, done by patients
• The role of prospective trials registration and trials registers in improving the design, conduct and reporting of randomized clinical trials from developing countries
• The role of reviewer reflexivity: reflections from a mixed-method consultative systematic review
• The role of scoping reviews in guideline development
  
• The role of specialist registers of trials in the age of the 'Mega-Register'
• The role of student scholarships in Cochrane reviews
• The role of Systematic Reviews in Author Guidelines of Physiotherapy related medical journals - A meta study
• The role of systematic reviews in meta-analyses: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics for the treatment of depression
• The role of the medical information database in managing the East Japan disaster
• The Role of the NHS economic evaluation database (NHS EED) within the systematic review process
• The Russian translation project and dissemination of Cochrane evidence: achievements and barriers as feedback from volunteer translators
• The safe use of LLMs for screening in systematic reviews
  
• The safety and effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review
• The scientific basis of cancer care: the discrepancy between research priorities and research efforts
• The scope and impact of Cochrane Reviews related to cancer
• The scope of empirical research in bioethics
• The search for guidelines: A comprehensive approach.
• The selection of fixed- or random-effect models in recent published meta-analyses
• The sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index (SCI)
• The Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (SGAT-SR): user experience with 113 Cochrane Reviews
• The side-effects of digital game-based learning: a systematic review
• The size of the gap between research evidence and clinical practise: questionnaire survey on treatment of patients with liver disease
• The snowball effect: promoting Cochrane evidence via social media
• The South Asian Cochrane Network: supporting reviewers in South Asia and contributing to the global Cochrane agenda
• The SPARK tool to prioritize questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research
• The SPIRIT initiative: defining standard protocol items for randomised trials
• The State of Research on Fertility for LGBTQ+ people: A scoping review
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada
• The Stats Café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified)
• The stats café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified)
• The status of using GRADE in systematic reviews of health effects on climate change
  
• The straight leg raising test: meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy in radiculopathy
• The strategies and measures of promoting improvement of the quality of clinical trials in China
• The strength of recommendation is weak for use of ShenXiong glucose injection in patients with AIS
• The Stroke Therapy Evaluation Progrannne(STEP): An Attempt To Introduce A Culture Of Evidence-Based Practice Into Stroke Rehabilitation.
• The structure of research questions in rehabilitation randomized-controlled clinical trials: a methodological study
• The study of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews of acupuncture
• The study of reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis on acupuncture
• The Study-Level Index of Confounding: a meta-analytic tool to enhance the utility of observational data for comparative effectiveness
• The Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for global policy making
• The suspension of radiotherapy for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients before and after evidence implementation
• The Sustainable Development Goals and Health Technology Assessment in Brazil
  
• The Sustainable Knowledge Platform for evidence synthesis product
• The Symptomatic Treatment of The Cough in Whooping Cough
• The synthesis of economic evidence to improve global policy and equity in healthcare decision-making, using systematic reviews with hierarchical decision matrices
• The Systematic Review Data Repository 2.0 (SRDR 2.0) – Summary data for end-users
• The Systematic Review Toolbox: an updated resource to support evidence synthesis
• The systematic reviews and meta-analyses on nutrition: a bibliometric analyses
• The Systematic Reviews Training Unit: capacity building for the future
• The systematic use of evidence-based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision making in an international guideline project
• The TARCiS statement: guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching
• The theoretical design of the Oncology Nurses Core Competencies Framework adapted to the Romanian sociocultural context
• The Theory of Everything in Health Decision-Making: Step 2
• The theory of planned behaviour applied to shared decision making behaviours: a systematic review
• The therapeutic drug management program: a collaborative initiative of teaching hospitals
• The time-series studies for health policy research in China
• The timing of outcome measurement is not usually defined in systematic review protocols registered in PROSPERO
• The top cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a bibliometric analysis
• The top clinical research priorities in mental health: implementation and maintainance of a website with free access for researchers, academics, health professionals and consumers in Brazil
• The TRANSFER framework to assess transferability of systematic review findings
• The treatment of Spasmodic Dysphonia with Botulinum Toxin injection
• The trend of life expectancy for people with disabilities in Taiwan
• The triple burden of malnutrition: Strengthening influential nutrition evidence synthesis, advocacy and leadership in LMICs for LMICs
  
• The triple C (consultation, collaboration and consolidation) model - a way forward to sustainability of evidence into practice
• The TRIPOD extension for reporting of prediction model studies using patient-level data from electronic healthcare records and meta-analysis
• The type and evaluation of evidence in clinical pathways
• The UK NHS HTA programme
• The UK NHS HTA programme
• The UK top 10 clinical research priorities in neuro-oncology
• The unique challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of cluster-randomized trials
• The update of the JBI critical appraisal tools for risk of bias assessment: rationale and justification
• The updated JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines in China
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review of the research evidence
• The UpPriority Tool: a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline’s questions
• The UpPriority Tool: Development of a prioritisation tool for updating clinical guideline questions
• The urgent needs for building the capability of systematic reviews in the Asia Pacific countries
• The Use of "Grey Literature" in a Sub-set of Neurological Cochrane Reviews
• The use of a Theory of Change model in a mixed-methods systematic review (MMSR): an example from the Development Aid sector.
• The use of an ordered multinomial logit model in network analysis: An example in psoriatic arthritis
• The use of artificial intelligence on adherence to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
  
• The use of Azoles in the treatment of allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis
• The use of Cochrane abstracts on PDAs at the point-of-care: effect on clinical behavior
• The use of Cochrane evidence and guidance in World Health Organization guidelines
• The use of Cochrane Reviews for decision making by a local public health department
• The use of Cochrane reviews in an African first-aid and prevention guideline for lay people
• The use of Cochrane Reviews in practice guidelines for Dutch GPs
• The use of Cochrane Reviews in the development of a first aid guideline for daily practice
• The use of Cochrane reviews to inform clinical recommendations in the Danish National Clinical Guideline development
• The use of Cochrane SR in the development of clinical practice guidelines. The case of syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections and other infections of the genital tract. 2012
• The use of Cochrane SR in the process of developing mental health guidelines produced in Brazil
• The use of collaborative writing applications in healthcare education - a scoping review
• The use of complementary checklists for data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
• The use of composite endpoints in clinical trials: a critical review
• The use of composite outcomes in neonatal trials: an analysis of Cochrane Reviews
• The use of content knowledge in the assessment of bias in trials
• The use of evidence and its contribution to action in Sexual and Reproductive Health: Lessons from Contribution mapping in Nigeria
• The use of evidence based medicine in promoting the social acceptance of family planning in the Philippines
• The use of evidence-based research (EBR) approach in reporting guidelines: a cross-sectional study
  
• The Use of GRADE in Cochrane Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine
• The use of GRADE in systematic reviews of observational studies
• The use of GRADE methods in World Health Organization (WHO) public health guidelines: distributions of strength of recommendations and confidence in estimates of effect
• The Use of GRADE Methods to Support the Recommendations for Health interventions in the World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Guidelines
• The use of GRADE on dose-response meta-analysis in 2019: a cross-sectional study
• The use of language methodology for disseminating Cochrane Evidence through Cochrane Corners: Cochrane Rehabilitation experience.
• The use of mhealth to promote women’s empowerment and gender equity in a rural health system in Burkina Faso
• The use of nature language processing (NLP) for rapid literature screening in the update of systematic reviews: a comparison of four different models
• The use of non-randomized studies in the Cochrane reviews on drugs and alcohol
• The use of Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials (ORBIT) classification in Cochrane Reviews
• The use of qualitative methods to assess impact of the knowledge broker mentoring program
• The use of statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts: for support rather than illumination
• The use Of symptom "Progression" instead Of "Response" as a potentially stable endpoint for systematic reviews Of clinical trials using subjective endpoints.
• The use of synthesis methods in support of developing a new surveillance initiative
• The Use of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses When Designing and Reporting Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
• The use of systematic reviews by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians
• The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: a systematic review
• The use of systematic reviews in the development of provincial public health mandatory guidelines and services
• The use of systematic reviews to optimize blood donor selection: the example of dental care
• The use of the Cochrane database in teaching evidence-ased nedicine (EBM): Experiences in a developing country.
• The use of the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework for the evaluation of multiple-intervention comparison for health decision making
  
• The use of trial protocols to assess risk of bias due to selective reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey
• The usefulness of different information sources for retrieving adverse effects data for a systematic review
• The usefulness of The Cochrane Library in the development of a systematic bibliography on employee health and work performance
• The utility and relevance of the Cochrane database Of systematic reviews from a Maori health perspective
• The utility for identification of best available evidence of a register of controlled studies that evaluate interventions to prevent alcohol-impaired driving
• The utility of systematic reviews for informing agri-food public health policy: a survey of Canadian policy makers
• The utilization of a machine learning tool to screen sources in a rapid scoping review