• The impact of innovative methods and techniques on future guideline development
  
• The impact of low back pain clinical trials measured by the Altmetric score: cross-sectional study
• The impact of mental health and psychosocial support programmes on people affected by humanitarian crises: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• The impact of modified intention-to-treat reporting randomised trials in meta-analyses
• The Impact of Parenting Programs on Adolescent Mental Health, Positive Development, and the Parent–Adolescent Relationship
• The impact of patients’ and health care professionals’ voices in clinical guidelines – integrating qualitative evidence in clinical guidelines
  
• The impact of public comments on the development of methodology standards for patient-centred outcomes research
• The impact of publication bias and small study effects on the efficacy and ranking of antipsychotics
• The impact of selective searching on the results of systematic reviews
• The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction in German primary care
• The impact of studies from a trial register for the results of systematic review: a survey of Cochrane reviews
• The impact of studies from trial registries on the results of systematic review: a survey of Cochrane Reviews
• The impact of systematic reviews on health care policy
• The Impact of the Collaboration on China: Chinese Cochrane Centre Developing with the Collaboration
• The impact of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine
• The Impact of the problem-based learning /community-based education curriculum on the cognitive function of UNITRA medical students
• The impact of trial registration on assessing selective reporting bias in Cochrane reviews
• The impact of underpowered studies in meta-analyses reported by Cochrane Reviews
• The impact of using EMBASE in addition to PubMed and other databases during regional activity-based health technology assessment (HTA)
• The impact of utilizing implications for practice in Cochrane systematic reviews on patient care in obstetrics
• The IMPACT realist review on interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: key findings and methodological lessons
• The impacts of financial literacy interventions for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises on welfare and firm performance
• The imperfect balance between investment and payback from presenting Cochrane reviews to lay people: the PartecipaSalute experience
• THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A LEARNING SYSTEM FOR EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES FOR PSYCHOSIS IN QUEBEC
• The implementation of an integrated approach to guidance prioritisation at NICE
• The implementation of clinical guidelines in an academic medical centre
• The implementation of clinical practice guidelines: The Tunisian experience
• The implementation of clinically effective stroke services in the UK
• The implementation of policy to manage potentially problematic studies in Cochrane review updates – a meta-epidemiological study
• The implications for meta-analysis of different methods of analysing count data
• The implications of different intervention definitions on a network meta-analysis of acupuncture and other physical therapies for the relief of chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee
• The importance of a multidisciplinary expert panel when evidence is scarce: example of guidelines for psychosocial support after traumatic events
• The importance of a multidisciplinary team in developing an evidence-based guideline on first aid for road traffic injuries in Africa
• The importance of a systematic search strategy
• The importance of context: how can evidence-based knowledge best be presented to clinicians in the mental health field?
• The importance of critical revision of translated abstracts
• The importance of implementation evaluation. Case study of a review on preschool feeding programmes to improve the health of disadvantaged young children
• The importance of minimal important differences to inform systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: an example
• The importance of process evaluation: a tale of two reviews
• The importance of registration for systematic reviews/meta-analysis about traditional Chinese medicine in Chinese
• The importance of the assessment of selective cross-over in randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews
• The importance pf Cochrane for medical students in Syria
• The improved Systematic Review Data Repository Plus (SRDR+): A free, “FHIR-ed up” tool for screening, data extraction, and data sharing
• The inclusion of the estimated inter-study variation into forest plots for random-effects meta-analyses - a suggestion for a graphical representation
• The Individual Participant Data (IPD) Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomized controlled trials
• The inefficiency of isolation: Why evidence providers and evidence synthesisers can break out of their silos
• The influence in clinical care by Evidence-based Medicine after the 1-year course training
• The influence of bias in randomised controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies
• The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of RCTs: An updated systematic review
• The Influence of Environmental Taxes on Income Distribution: A Meta-analysis
  
• The influence of funding source on study characteristics in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)
• The influence of industry sponsorship and other financial conflicts of interest on the outcomes and quality of systematic reviews
• The influence of mortality time-points on pooled effect estimates in critical care meta-analyses
• The influence of pet therapy in anxiety reduction among undergraduate nursing students
• The influence of pharmaceutical companies on guidelines—two examples from Germany
• The influence of poverty alleviation on climate change: A meta-analysis
  
• The influence of study characteristics on methodological and reporting quality of dose-response meta-analysis: a cross-sectional study
• The information need in systematic review and meta-analysis about acupuncture
• The information overload: how physicians search for information to manage information needs of their patients
• The innovative approach to evaluating the correlations between domains of clinical practice guideline for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy
  
• The Inspiration from Cochrane Library: A Proposal for Publishing Research Protocol in Chinese Biomedical Journals
• The instrument for measuring the implementation situation of Traditional Chinese Medicine guideline: Evaluation and application
• The integration among clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and health technology assessments
  
• The integrity of unclear reported RCTs during selection period of systematic review: a telephone interview survey
  
• The interaction between structured digital systematic reviews and guidelines: shaping the future. A workshop in collaboration with GINTech and GRADETech
• The International Collaborative Group on Clinical Trial Registries: aims and achievements
• The international distribution of RCTs in Cochrane dementia intervention reviews
• The International Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Database (IQOD). Reference values of the PGWBI on 8536 subjects
• The interobserver reliability in the assessment of methodological quality of RCTs and CCTs in the addiction field
• The Inverse Research Law – the least evidence from settings where need is greatest. An overview of reviews of interventions to reduce the risk of preterm births and their generalisability to low- and middle-income settings
• The investigation on evidence support of proprietary Chinese medicine in 2015 National List of Essential Medicines
• The invisible mechanism of engagement: a realist review of social and emotional wellbeing programs for Australian Aboriginal children and youth
• The ISSG Search Filter Resource: improving the efficiency and quality of searches for studies for systematic reviews
• The Italian IN-DEEP project - integrating and deriving evidence, experiences and preferences: developing research-based health information applicable to decision making and self-management by people with multiple sclerosis
• The James Lind Library: a free, multilingual web-based resource for public and professional education
• The JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group
• The journey from prioritised reviews to publication (or not!)
• The journey from working group to guidelines, via evidence: Ensuring equity of access to rehabilitation for people with stroke
• The judicialisation of health in Brazil: a huge challenge that calls for innovative solutions
• The known knowns and known unknowns: A database of knowledge clusters and knowledge gaps in environmental management
• The lack of sex disaggregated data as a challenge to the review process: the case of a review of peer-based interventions for HIV positive women
• The landscape of clinical trial activity focusing on indigenous health in Australia from 2008 to 2018
• The landscape of clinical trial activity focusing on Indigenous health in Australia from 2008-2018
• The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality
• The language of evidence
• The language restrictions and handsearching: a comparative analysis of meta analysis of interventions published in Chinese academic journals and Cochrane Library
• The Leeds Outcomes Stakeholders Survey (LOSS) Study
• The Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS) - introduction and outlook
• The licorice allsorts approach: review and synthesis of a mixed bag of research
• The limitation of word count in Chinese journals: a potential impediment for implementing the CONSORT statement
• The Living Overview of Evidence database (LOVE) may be more efficient than a traditional search of systematic reviews and randomized trials
• The longitudinal accumulated effects of mastery of stress of families to reduce their stress and PTSD through critical-care transition
• The majority of reporting guidelines development lack conducting the Delphi method: A systematic search of reporting guidelines
• The Malnutrition in the Elderly (MaNuEL) Knowledge Hub: Tackling the increasing problem of malnutrition in older persons
• The Master List of Journals Being Searched: where it’s been and where it’s going
• The medical management of children who failed the Ewing hearing test: current practice compared to outcomes of RCTs
• The medical management of children who failed the Ewing hearing test: current practice compared to outcomes of RCTs
• The message: good communication of results (and caveats), and how to avoid Cochrane’s most common major errors
• The method of exracting data from figure with software
• the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China: A scoping review
• The methodological quality of clinical pathways published in journals in China: 2014-2016
• The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic tests of MRI
• The methodological quality of the traditional Chinese medicine clinical pathway in China
• The methodological soundness of literature reviews addressing three potential zoonotic public health issues
• The methodology and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a review
• The methods and strategies for patient and carer involvement in living guidelines: A qualitative study and co-production approach
  
• The Methods for Research Synthesis node of the Economic and Social Research Council's National Centre for Research Methods: methodological challenges in evidence synthesis
• The methods of statistical analysis used in meta-epidemiological studies
• The mixed methods appraisal tool for assessing studies with diverse designs: example from a systematic mixed studies review on the key processes and outcomes of participatory research with health organizations
• The moral dimensions of meta-analysis: a grounded theory of the meta-analytic process
• The multiplicity problem in systematic reviews
• The MuSE Consortium: a strategy to equitably engage diverse stakeholders to create guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development
• The National Institute for Health Research Complex Reviews Support Unit (NIHR CRSU): supporting successful delivery of complex reviews
• The nature and quality of systematic reviews of prognostic studies
• The nature and source of bias in review articles: the example of chronic fatigue syndrome
• The need for better design and reporting of RCTs in a neglected but widespread skin disease
• The need for systematic research in traditional Chinese medicine
• The need to collaborate for updating systematic reviews
• The need to improve 'Implications for research' sections in Cochrane reviews
• The Norwegian electronic health library - helping Norwegian health professionals in accessing English language resources
• The not-so-systematic reviews: Challenges with misunderstanding definitions in environmental sciences
• The number needed to read: are capture-recapture techniques feasible in searching literature for systematic reviews?
• The number needed to treat in pairwise and network meta-analysis and its graphical representation
• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in China
• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in Nephrology
• The numerous typologies and taxonomies of evidence synthesis
• The objectively-derived approach enables the development of high-quality search strategies for bibliographic databases
• The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative: Optimising the value of observational data
• The One World Alliance: ensuring relevance to countries with developing economies
• The opinions of guideline developers towards automation in health research: a thematic analysis using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation
• The Optimize4MNH guideline process: state-of-the-art methods for building an evidence-based guideline for health systems
• The ORBIT Study: outcome reporting bias in trials – interviews with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes
• The ORBIT study: outcome reporting bias in trials – inter­views with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes AU:Rebecca Smyth
• The organization of health technology assessment in a European perspective
• The Ottawa Decision Support Framework as a tool to bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine: preliminary results of an implementation study
• The Ottawa panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (EBCPGs) for rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA)
• The outcomes studied by palliative care systematic reviews
• The output of a Masters of Science course in systematic Cochrane reviews
• The PAHO report on the Venezuelan primary health care intervention Barrio Adentro
• The People’s Review: a protocol for a systematic review powered by the public.
• The performance of methodological filters for diagnostic studies in nephrology journals
• The perspective of patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The perspective of people living with chronic heart failure on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The perspective of people living with obesity on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure: derivation and application
• The placebo effect dependent on time? - A meta-analysis
• The placebo response in neuropathic pain trials: It is not what you think
• The plain language summary: Cochrane's most valuable product?
• The Policy Liaison Initiative: increasing usability of The Cochrane Library for policy makers
• The Polyglot Search Translator (PST): evaluation of a tool for improving searching in systematic reviews: a randomised cross-over trial
• The Possible Cochrane Neurological Network Newletter: an Information Channel to Diffuse the Cochrane Collaboration in the Neurological Field.
• The potential of text mining to reduce screening workload in systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation
• The power of placebos
• The power of storyboarding as an analytical tool in QES: From review to fieldwork to dissemination
• The power of tailored messaging: Results from Canada's first randomized controlled trial of knowledge brokering
• The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) training programme implementation in a city in South of Brazil
• The predictive validity of GRADE for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study
• The present and future use of text mining for study identification
• The present situation of systematic review training courses in China
• The present status of evidence based medicine (E.B.M.): how relevant is it for developing countries?
• The prestigious influence of the medical world on humanity and its development
  
• The prevalence of frailty among patients with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• The prevalence of outcome reporting bias in trials (the ORBITstudy)
• The primary health care (PHC) experience with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in Saudi Arabia (SA)
• The prioritization of cost-effectiveness evidence for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Chile
• The PRISMA evaluate the reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses’ abstracts of cost-effectiveness of pregnancy mortality
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta analyses of nursing interventions published in China
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews of China health policy
• The PRISMA-IPD Statement: preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
• The problems of a systematic reviewer in a developing country.
• The problems with systematic reviews: working towards the solutions
• The Process of Current Care Guideline for Developmental Coordination Disorder in Finland
  
• The processing of Cochrane Open Access
• The production of guidelines elaborated in the context of the Brazilian Public Health System in twelve years
  
• The production, preservation and dissemination of rescue evidence in the Wenchuan earthquake
• The progress of evidence-based healthcare in the National Health Service in England and Wales
• The PROGRESS-Plus framework for assessing the equity of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China
• The promise of hybrid designs for the evaluation of implementation efforts
• The propagation of best evidence: 23 years of Cochrane Brazil workshops
• The proportion of articles behind paywalls – a barrier to patient access?
• The proposed Cochrane agenda setting and priority setting methods group: establishing a research program
• The pros and cons of including abstracts in systematic reviews: findings from the Multiple Data Sources Study (MUDS)
• The protective measures for health-care workers during the outbreak of COVID-19: A rapid review
• The provision of services in the UK for armed forces veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: a rapid evidence synthesis
• The Psychometric Assessment Project: an evaluation of psychometric measures used within Norwegian mental health services
• The Ptolemy Project: knowledge translation and equity in East Africa
• The public sector and the Cochrane Collaboration: potential and problems In the partnerships, and traps for young players
• The public, the internet, and the media are the bridge between producers and users
• The publication and methodological characteristics of network meta-analysis published in top medical journals: a cross-sectional survey
  
• The publishing characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews for social welfare
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for health policy research
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for nursing research
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews of dentistry and oral health by Chinese researchers
• The quality of Cochrane synopses - a quality assessment pilot project
• The quality of economic studies in respiratory diseases in China by QHES tool
• The quality of evidence is a key determinant of strength of recommendations
• The quality of randomized clinical trials in surgery can be improved. A systematic review
• The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials abstracts is sub-optimal: a survey of four major general medical journals
• The quality of reporting of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on peripartum antiretroviral therapies for preventing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
• The quality of systematic reviews of treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder