• Psychometric evidence for outcome measures used in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
• Psychometric evidence for outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
• Psychosocial consequences of communicating results of non-invasive prenatal testing to parents: an evidence map
• Psychosocial implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review
• Psychosocial interventions for children exposed to traumatic events in low- and middle-income countries: an individual patient data meta-analysis
• Psychosocial interventions preventing gang-related crime among children and young adults
• Psychosocial, Pharmacological, and Legal Interventions for Improving the Psychosocial Outcomes of Children with Substance Misusing Parents
• Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) bench to bedside: developing a PPI model across multiple areas of research
• Public and patient involvement in the HTA decision-making process in Kazakhstan
• Public health evidence synthesis – existing challenges, inadequacy of existing methods and opportunities: A narrative systematic review
• Public perceptions of health risk management in China: A cross-sectional survey
  
• Public Private Partnerships - for improving maternal and neonatal health service delivery
• Public-Private Partnerships in Primary Healthcare
• Publication and appraisal of methodological guidelines: the development of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials by the Department of Science and Technology of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (DECIT/MOH)
• Publication bias - a cross-sectional study of randomised trials in Sub-saharan Africa: ongoing challenges of research waste
• Publication bias and diagnostic research: full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
• Publication bias and heterogeneity in systematic reviews of newer pharmacotherapies for the treatment of depression
• Publication bias and meta-analysis: A practical example
• Publication bias and the human albumin review
• Publication bias in clinical trials on monoclonal antibodies: a cross-sectional study
• Publication bias in post-graduate medical education dissertations in India
• Publication bias in randomised trials of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder
• Publication bias in statistical overview of trials: example of psychological rehabilitation following myocardial infarction
• Publication bias in the field of subfertility
• Publication bias is a serious threat to the validity of Cochrane reviews
• Publication bias tests for survival data: a simulation study
• Publication bias: is it also present in the secondary literature?
• Publication ethics and Cochrane reviews
• Publication of clinical studies in German general health care journals
• Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Approved New Drug Applications in the United States
• Publication of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials: preliminary evidence of bias
• Publication of IPD meta-analyses in Potential barriers andopportunities
• Publication of responses to a Cochrane systematic review on mass media interventions for HIV testing
• Publication of Reviews Synthesizing Child Health Evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to determine factors associated with publication venue
• Publication rate and characteristics of trials registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register
• Publicity of data as an ethical obligation to patients and society
• Publicly funded research in New Zealand: Is the money being well spent?
• Publicly-available data from more than 130 systematic reviews containing more than 13,000 studies – The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR)
• Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): recommendations from editors and reviewers
• Publishing overviews in the cochrane library
• PubMed Similar Articles as search method in rapid reviews
• Purchasers and cost-effectiveness of interventions: are secondary economic evaluations possible?
• Purity or pragmatism: how does systematic review methodology from health care translate to the field of development?
• Purposive sampling within population groups for qualitative evidence syntheses: methodological lessons from building on previous sampling experiences
• Purposively sampling for qualitative evidence syntheses: Methodological lessons from a synthesis on vaccination communication
• Putting Africa first: supporting novice authors of HIV/AIDS reviews in Africa
• Putting evidence at the centre of everyday life
• Putting evidence into practice: development and content of a critical care pathway (CCP) for fractured neck of femur (FNOF)
• Putting the issues on the table: summarising outcomes from reviews of reviews to inform health policy
• Putting the puzzle pieces together: lessons learnt in managing associated trial records in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Putting the puzzle together: Accessing raw quality-of-life data from clinical study reports for use in evidence synthesis
• QUADAS-2: an updated quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies
• QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies
• QUADAS: early experience with a new methodological scoring tool for diagnostic meta-analyses
• Qualitative evidence synthesis by storyboarding and storytelling: Treatment adherence
• Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Workshop (CLOSED SESSION)
• Qualitative evidence synthesis: methods for integration with effectiveness reviews
• Qualitative evidence synthesis: three different approaches to using framework synthesis within healthcare research
• Qualitative meta-analyses: improvement of markers for validity and precision
• Qualitative synthesis with meta-aggregation: A practicum
• Qualitative/quantitative descriptors of risk and benefit of hormone replacement therapy
• Quality analysis of literatures on clinical randomized controlled trial of pre-eclampsia treated with TCM
• Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials on Chinese medicinal herbs for unstable angina pectoris
• Quality and feasibility of guideline adaptation by general practice trainees
• Quality and quantity of cancer-related systematic reviews published in high-impact journals
• Quality Appraisal of Chinese Rapid Guidelines
• Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines and consensus statements on computed tomography for coronary artery disease
• Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements on nursing in China
• Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes: a protocol for AGREEII-based living systematic review
• Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on glioma
• Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic liver cancer: a systematic review
• Quality Appraisal of Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed in Taiwan
• Quality appraisal of prevalence studies: a systematic review of tools with classification of their components
• Quality appraisal of studies on prognostic and diagnostic risk models: a systematic review
• Quality Appraisal Tools for Primary Studies in Human Health: A meta-epidemiological survey
• Quality Assessment in Cochrane Reviews : Do We Practice What W0e Preach?
• Quality assessment in studies of all non-randomised designs: example from a Cochrane Review of surgery for epilepsy
• Quality assessment in systematic reviews of prognosis: descriptive analysis, development and testing of new recommendations
• Quality assessment of Chinese clinical guidelines in 2015
• Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
• Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of psoriasis
• Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40 49 years
• Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies after a modified version of QUADAS-2 in ophthalmological research
• Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies using QUADAS-2
• Quality Assessment of Evidence-Based Checklists Identifying Predatory Journals and Comparison of Checklist Items against a Consensus Definition
• Quality assessment of included studies in systematic reviews/meta-analysis based on individual patient data: a cross-sectional analysis
• Quality assessment of machine learning papers: development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of machine learning papers
• Quality assessment of oral health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in children and adolescents
• Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies (QUAPAS): an extension of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool for systematic reviews of prognostic test accuracy studies
• Quality assessment of randomized trials
• Quality assessment of screening studies using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool
• Quality assessment of studies for double-reading (DR) of screening mammograms and breast-ultrasound (BU) after negative screening-mammogram: contribution of the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool
• Quality assessment of trials found within the scope of Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis (CCDAN)
• Quality assessment of trials found within the scope of Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Group
• Quality assessment tool for the methodology of policy brief for health
• Quality assessment tools for published animal studies
• Quality assessments of randomized controlled trials: an evaluation by the Chalmers versus the Jadad method
• Quality assurance of Cochrane systematic review abstracts; a comparison with abstracts published in evidence-based medicine
• Quality control of computer databases: a study into the efficiency of electronic searches for randomized trials
• Quality Evaluation and Reporting Specification for Real-World Evidence of Traditional Chinese Medicine
• Quality evaluation indicators of health services in China’s Village clinics: a systematic review
• Quality evaluation of a Cochrane Plain language summary using the DISCERN tool: cross-sectional study
• Quality evaluation or existing issues of current systematic review of disease burden
  
• Quality improvement and evidence-based decision making on problems of communication with patients and their families in hospitals
• Quality improvement in parent-child reviews
• Quality improvement in the care of depressive disorders: transfer of evaluated quality management practice tools into routine
• Quality Improvement Kit for Hospitals: Promoting Structural Change to Support Guideline Implementation
• Quality in reporting adverse events and the PRISMA Harms Extension
• Quality indicators of long-term care for older adults with dementia in integrated medical and nursing care institutions: A systematic review
• Quality measures of included studies for Cochrane reviews - beyond randomization and blinding
• Quality of Brazilian Ministry of Health clinical practice guidelines: How can we improve?
• Quality of clinical heterogeneity investigations in systematic reviews: an assessment of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
• Quality of clinical research: a systematic review of definitions and development of a comprehensive framework of indicators
• Quality of Cochrane systematic review abstracts; readability and comparison with handbook guidelines
• Quality of descriptions of rehabilitation interventions in low back pain: a review of published randomized controlled trials
• Quality of evidence for bias from attributes of study design
• Quality of evidence gap between adult and paediatric guidelines
• Quality of evidence in main comparisons of Cochrane intervention reviews
• Quality of evidence informing clinical guidelines on treatment of opioid dependence
• Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
• Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
• Quality of evidence: are Cochrane review authors speaking the same language?
• Quality of guideline recommendations about physical activity and exercise to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and critical appraisal
• Quality of health information in Web 2.0
• Quality of healthcare provided in a task-shifting health system: Experience from a mobile health service in a southern African country
• Quality of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Thai healthcare journals
• Quality of Randomised Clinical Trials Affects Estimates of Intervention Efficacy
• Quality of randomised controlled trials included in meta-analyses: how often and how is it assessed?
• Quality of report of the clinical quantitative research by area of investigation on the Revista Médica de Chile between years 2017-2021
• Quality of reporting and adherence to the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 for degradable metal research in animal models of bone fracture
• Quality of reporting and of methods in studies on treatment of ulcers caused by nerve damage in leprosy
• Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A survey of three clinical specialities
• Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices
• Quality of reporting of clinical prediction model studies: adherence to TRIPOD
• Quality of reporting of clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine for vascular dementia
• Quality of reporting of cost-effectiveness studies in Brazilian health public system: a meta-epidemiological study
• Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
• Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in medical laboratory journals
• Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and its affect on estimates of intervention effectiveness
• Quality of reporting of trials abstracts needs to be improved: a survey of four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine
• Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: what authors, reviewers and consumers should consider
• Quality of statistical methods reported in randomised-controlled trials of type-2 diabetes (T2DM) published in 2016
• Quality of studies published as systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in cancer prevention – a systematic methodological survey
• Quality of studies published as systematic reviews or meta-analyses in Polish journals listed on Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
• Quality of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes identified within a systematic review on low-dose rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
• Quality of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy on Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias
• Quality of systematic reviews of the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group: can we improve it?
• Quality of systematic reviews used to build guidelines on prevention and treatment of breast and colorectal cancers
• Quality of the reporting of Brazilian Ministry of Health updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGU) versions: Applying checkUP
• Quality of the reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary interventions
• Quality of the systematic reviews of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis Group
• Quality of trials of life-style interventions underpinning two national clinical guidelines
• Quality of warfarin control and the risk of stroke, bleeding and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation
• Quality Predictors of Randomised Clinical Trials Published in the 'Hepatology' Journal
• Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
• Quality scoring of diagnostic articles for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines
• Quality scoring of randomized controlled trials for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines
• Quantification of bias in the results of non-randomised studies compared with randomised studies
• Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health
• Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analyses
• Quantifying how diagnostic test accuracy depends on threshold in a meta-analysis
• Quantifying the evidence gap in stroke rehabilitation
• Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics
• Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as patient input in a health-technology assessment on Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)
• Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for inclusion in a mixed studies review: an update of the quantitizing proposition
• Quantity and Quality of Health Economics Literature in Health Technology Assessment.
• Quasi-randomisation in emergency setting trials: a recipe for selection bias, or an efficient approach?
• Quaternary prevention - the role of Point-of-Care tools
• Question CF: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in cystic fibrosis shared decision making
• Question formulation and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews: Accuracy and beyond
• Questionable Beauty Of Prevention - Case Of Overweight Prevention
• Questionable early stopping: Case study of supplemental perioperative oxygen and the incidence of surgical site infection
• Questioning the methodological superiority of ‘placebo’ over ‘active’ controlled trials
• Quick and messy: Rapid review methods for public health, social sciences, and non-clinical evidence synthesis
  
• Quick on the draw: producing a sound evidence base to a tight time scale
• R for Evidence Synthesis
  
• R Hands-on: Upskilling Workshop on Using R and Shiny Apps for Information Retrieval Tasks
  
• Racial Health Equity Definitions and Terminologies in Prominent Public Health Websites: A Systematic Review
• Raising awareness about the Cochrane Collaboration and South African Cochrane Centre in Ethiopia
• Random reflections on Archie Cochrane
• Random-effects meta-analyses should be optimal - not traditional
• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
• Randomised and controlled clinical trials in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register and their inclusion in Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group systematic reviews
• Randomised clinical trials on acupuncture in the Korean literature: bibliometric analysis and methodological quality
• Randomised clinical trials with negative results: Is there an increase in their reporting?
• Randomised clinical trials: advantages and limitations of using parallel-group design or cross-over designs in the field of methylphenidate for ADHD
• Randomised controlled trials in nephrology: are more and better needed?
• Randomised controlled trials of surgical procedures in children: a cross-sectional study
• Randomised-controlled trials are particularly scarce and underpowered in the setting of rare diseases: Further acquisition of knowledge is needed
• Randomized clinical trials of the impact of alternative diagnostic strategies on patient-important outcomes: a systematic survey
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for policy interventions? A review of reviews and meta-regression
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in certain collagen vascular diseases
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rehabilitation research
• Randomized Controlled Trials in "Chinese Journal of Digestion " - A Handsearching of 1981-1998
• Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases" - a handsearching of 1983~1997
• Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases" between 1991 and 1999
• Randomized controlled trials in the leading Chinese internal medical journals
• Randomized controlled trials of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment in Africa: results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register
• Randomized controlled trials relevant to viral hepatitis in the Chinese literature
• Randomized trials of neurosurgical interventions: a systematic appraisal