• Preparing 'Summary of findings' tables and grading confidence in estimates of test accuracy in DTA reviews
• Preparing an overview of reviews: lessons learned
• Preparing and writing a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for submission, editing and publication: common errors and how to solve them
• Preparing for submitting your manuscript to the Cochrane’s Central Editorial Service for Peer Review – observations from the Central Editorial Service Quality Assurance Team
• Preparing medical students for evidence-based medicine ‒ a questionnaire study on education/training in evidence synthesis
  
• Preparing results of different critical appraisal tools for decision-makers—a real-world example
• Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes measures in meta-analyses: A systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
• Presentation for GES 2024
• Presentation of continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: a survey of clinicians’ understanding and preferences
• Presentation of time-to-event outcomes in GRADE Summary of Finding (SOF) tables: Evaluation of Cochrane Cancer Reviews
• Presenting clinically relevant information on diagnostic performance in systematic reviews: the use of predictive values (PPV and 1-NPV)
• Presenting evidence and practice: A visual interactive map of review-level evidence and digital interventions for drug/alcohol misuse available in England
• Presenting evidence of effectiveness of interventions and more: the evidence of effects page
• Presenting evidence to professionals and the general population - a qualitative inquiry on recipients’ perception of systematic review summary formats
• Presenting evidence-based recommendations to patients and the public—what do people want and how should we provide it?
• Presenting meta-analysis as a typical 2 X 2 table
• Presenting summary information from Cochrane systematic reviews: randomised-controlled trial of infographics vs. standard text-based summaries
• Presenting the results of a Cochrane review to policy makers in a video format
• Presenting the results of a systematic review to non-experts: the Dissemination Checklist
• Presidential hotline: A potential tool for evidence-based decision making in the health sector in South Africa
• Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal
• Pressure injury prevention in critically Ill Patients at a hospital in Japan: Evidence Implementation Project
• Prevalence and determinants of hypertension in people living with HIV/AIDS in Fako Division, southwest region of Cameroon
• Prevalence and factors related to positive results of acupuncture randomized trials published in English
• Prevalence and Nature of Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Published Health Technology Assessment Reports
  
• Prevalence and types of 'Risk of bias' assessments across systematic reviews in sports and exercise medicine
• Prevalence of comorbidities in the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms among Postgraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
• Prevalence of gift and ghost authors in Cochrane Reviews
• Prevalence of insurance medicine related outcomes in update reviews of Cochrane’s 2015 priority list
• Prevalence of personal conflict of interest disclosure in cancer systematic reviews published in high-impact journals or the Cochrane library: A systematic review
• Preventing infection from reusable medical equipment
• Preventing infections in cancer patients: what influences the guidelines?
• Preventing over-diagnosis and over-treatment
• Preventing overdiagnosis—can Cochrane and systematic reviews help?
• Preventing overdiagnosis: the Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro experience
• Prevention and control of surgical site infection: a best practice implementation project
• Prevention and control of surgical site infection: preliminary results of a best practice implementation project
• Prevention and treatment of the common cold - The Ari group's contribution to overviews
• Prevention Management Of Falls In Elderly Inpatients: A Best Practice Implementation Project
• Prevention of ankle ligament injuries
• Prevention of asthma admissions with steroids
• Prevention of asthma relapse with steroids
• Prevention of fungal morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients
• Prevention of heel pressure ulcer among adult patients in orthopaedic wards: An evidence-based implementation project
• Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications among patients undergoing general surgery in an acute-care hospital: A best-practice implementation project
• Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with bisphosphonates - a meta-analysis
• Primary outcomes reported in abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov -do they agree?
• Primary prevention guidelines for mental health in the workplace using digital health technology
• PRIME-IPD: A systematic method to prepare Individual participant data for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• Primer in systematic reviews and research synthesis: helping people to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews in Africa
• Primer in systematic reviews: enhancing capacity to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews
• Priorities, publication and progress in reviewing treatment for peripheral nerve disorders
• Prioritisation for Evidence Aid: choosing systematic reviews for the Evidence Aid database
• Prioritisation of Cochrane reviews for consumers and the public to promote evidence-based health care
• Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences
• Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences
• Prioritisation: how can we meet the Strategy to 2020 target and what does it mean for individual Cochrane Review Groups?
• Prioritising and promoting topics for systematic reviews to address the public health needs of indigenous people
• Prioritising Cochrane reviews on the prevention and treatment of obesity: a mapping and stakeholder consultation project
• Prioritising investment in public health: Translating cost-benefit analysis evidence for policy makers
• Prioritising systematic review topics in public health: A Delphi study with a broad range of stakeholders.
• Prioritising systematic reviews for updating: unlocking the criteria behind Cochrane reviews declared as conclusive
• Prioritising the updating of systematic reviews
• Prioritising topics for new Cochrane systematic reviews in oral health
• Prioritising topics, formulating questions, and selecting outcomes for a World Health Organization nutrition guideline
• Prioritising whether and when to update Cochrane reviews
• Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review
• Prioritization methods in the development and adaptation of health practice guidelines: a systematic survey of published guidance
• Prioritization of primary research based on a mixed-methods systematic review
• Prioritization of research questions for evidence syntheses—a hands-on exercise and reflection following a systematic approach
• Prioritizing clinical research together with patients’ associations: early steps from the PartecipaSalute project
• Prioritizing questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research
• Prioritizing topics for and adopting/adapting WHO guidance: A critical interpretive synthesis
• Priority areas for systematic reviews in chronic otitis media – findings of a systematic-scoping process
• Priority setting distinguishing methodological quality from report quality: assessment example of systematic reviews about non-pharmacological intervention for depression with PRISMA and AMSTAR
• Priority setting for Cochrane Clinical Answers
• Priority setting for health coverage decisions: the application of an innovative methodology in the Chilean health system context
• Priority setting for research and practice of child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) based on evidence from Cochrane Reviews
• Priority setting for review topics in the Cochrane Review Groups.
• Priority setting for reviews and economic analyses at the World Health Organisation
• Priority setting for systematic reviews of interventions for communicable and non-communicable diseases in West Africa: the impact of consumer involvement
• Priority setting for the topic Work Participation: collaboration project between Cochrane Work and Cochrane Insurance Medicine
• Priority setting in practice guideline development: a survey of methodological guidance by guideline-producing organizations
• Priority Setting in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group
• Priority setting in the Swedish stroke guidelines
• Priority setting project for open-angle glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma: where we are now?
• Priority Setting within Cochrane Haematology.
• Priority-setting for systematic reviews in Nigeria
• PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of meta-analysis/systematic review in screening test
• PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist workshop
• PRISMA extension for systematic reviews of prevalence (PRISMA-Prev): interactive workshop
• PRISMA for reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts
• PRISMA in practice: keeping track of the literature search documentation. What are the problems?
• PRISMA-S: developing a new reporting guideline extension for literature searches
• Private ambulatory care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of strategies to improve quality
• PRO-EBP: an attempt to disseminate the culture of evidence-based physiotherapy practice in Poland
  
• Probability of major depression classification based on different diagnostic interviews: a synthesis of individual participant data meta-analyses
• Probability of selecting a treatment to recommend (POST-R): a new measure for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis
• PROBAST – A risk-of-bias tool for prediction-modelling studies
• PROBAST: a 'Risk of bias' tool for prediction modelling studies
• PROBAST: a risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies
• PROBAST: a risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies
• PROBAST: an opportunity to pilot test a new risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies
• PROBAST: introduction to a new risk of bias tool for prediction modelling studies
• PROBAST+AI: assessing quality, risk of bias and applicability of diagnostic and prognostic prediction models based on AI or ML techniques
• Probiotics in the overweight or obese pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
• Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of evidence based medicine
• Problems in the Use of Urinalysis results in metanalysis of randomised controlled trials on drug dependence
• Problems with Bayesian random effects in network meta-analysis
• Process and lessons learned during priority setting in three countries in Africa
• Process of identifying National Health Research Priority areas in Ministry of Health, Malaysia through evidence-based practice
• Producing and using generic decision aids linked to evidence summaries and guideline recommendations to enhance shared-decision making in clinical consultations
• Producing Cochrane reviews with multi-stakeholder synergic involvement. An experience with treatments for multiple sclerosis
• Producing evidence to inform policy and decision-making – a discussion about how we improve processes and outcomes for all.
  
• Producing evidence to inform policy and practice: A worked example of two reviews in health and social care
• Producing guidance on the ethical, governance and management of involving patients and community groups as co-applicants, team members and co-researchers in health research.
• Producing robust evidence – time to be part of the solution
  
• Producing the right reviews: a Cochrane approach to priority setting
• Producing Trusted Evidence: Identifying the Challenges and Finding the Solutions
• Producing useful evidence syntheses for public health decision-making
• Production models for Cochrane Reviews: What works? What are we doing to improve?
• Production, local adaptation and implementation of practice guidelines using evidence-based approaches: the collaboration between Emilia Romagna Regional Agency and the Italian Cochrane Centre
• Production, use, dissemination, and training in Cochrane systematic reviews for patient-centered outcomes and health decision-making in Bangladesh: a scoping review
• Professional improvement for the development of national clinical guidelines: Description of a online learning program
• Professionalisation of health services management mapping and the role of the education sector: scoping review
• Profile of Cochrane review authors
• Profile of overviews published by the Cochrane Library
• Profile of Public Contributions in the Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Brazilian Health System, in 2023
  
• Prognostic evidence synthesis and equity considerations informed recommendations for higher-risk children with moderate wasting in a WHO guideline
• Prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Prognostic models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: a systematic review
• Prognostic significance of TAZExpression in various cancers: a meta-analysis
• Programme drift or product failure? Learnings from 10 years of efforts to scale up zinc and ORS for the management of acute diarrhoea in children under 5
• Progress in time to update of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Progress of PROSPERO registering systematic reviews
• Progress toward a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR)
• Progressing towards core outcomes in gestational diabetes clinical trials and Cochrane Reviews
• Progression of a framework for dissemination and utilization of research evidence for health care policy and practice
• Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT): structure of a draft framework
• Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT): testing the framework in multiple systematic reviews
• Project SEA-ORCHID: South East Asia - Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries
• Project TAKE 5—transforming the antecedent ‘know-how’ for evidence synthesis: 5 factors to consider when conducting systematic reviews!
• Project Transform: Supporting Australian guideline developers to access and use research evidence
• Promises and Pitfalls in Systematic Reviews on Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Pain
• Promote the use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) to improve surgical safety and quality.
  
• Promoting access to Cochrane Collaboration outputs in developing countries: the possible role of post-graduate distance education
• Promoting accessibility and adoption of clinical guidances– An overview of the dissemination strategies undertaken by the Agency of Care Effectiveness
  
• Promoting and evaluating access to the Cochrane Library
• Promoting and sustaining use of insecticide-treated bednets in a rural community
• Promoting collaboration between Cochrane and the James Lind Alliance
• Promoting continual dialogue through engagement and illustration: a qualitative research project on involvement in generating and critiquing evidence within HTA
• Promoting effective use of the Cochrane library in a developing country: A case study of Nigeria.
• Promoting evidence-based decision making among hospital managers in Cameroon
• Promoting evidence-based health care
• Promoting Evidence-Based Health Care in Canada: The Canadian Cochrane Network and Centre
• Promoting evidence-based healthcare in South Asia and other low and middle income countries: an attempt to formulate a reliable framework
• Promoting evidence-informed decision making: a case of mentoring in one health unit
• Promoting health literacy through community based peer support: a worked example of innovative methods in integrating qualitative and quantitative research in evidence synthesis
• Promoting informed health decisions based on scientific data for non-professionals
• Promoting research and evidence synthesis in internal medicine resident academic projects
  
• Promoting research transparency - Interventions to improve the publication and dissemination of trial evidence: A scoping review
• Promoting research-informed decisions on maternal and child health: The SUPPORT Collaboration
• Promoting the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews in dental practice through Live Webinars : Unveiling the Experiences
• Promoting the rigorous development of clinical guidelines through the creation of a common appraisal
• Promoting the rigorous development of clinical guidelines through the creation of a common appraisal
• Promoting trial registration and protocol publication - perspectives from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
• Promoting uptake: using the web to disseminate reviews to parents and public health decision makers
• Promotion and prioritisation: Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group’s 20th anniversary project
• Promotion of evidence-based guidelines – a collaboration on statutory basis between German scientific medical societies, self-administration body and health ministry
  
• Proof of value decisions from proof of concept data: A review of Canadian formulary review recommendations
• Prophylactic management of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour: an overview of reviews
• Prophylaxis using heparin, low molecular weight heparin and phsyical methods against venous thrombosis in hip fracture surgery
• Proposal for a standard protocol for systematic reviews of treatment for back pain
• Proposal to establish a Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Trials Register
• Proposal to improve the ‘implications for research’ section of Cochrane Reviews
• Proposals for guideline development groups "Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and Assessment of Quality Improvement of Medical Care" in Japan
• Proposed Framework for Unifying Disease Definitions: An Essential Step before Guideline Development.
• Proposed methodology for adaptation of clinical guidelines for national application in Peru
• Proposed reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials
• Proposing an alternative GRADE evidence table to present the certainty of evidence of indirect comparisons
• Prospective collaborative meta-analysis of trials of weight management interventions in childhood overweight and obesity
• Prospective trial registration in the Research Integrity Assessment (RIA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
• Prospective Trial Registration: Cochrane Renal Group experience
• Prospective use of network meta-analysis using formal statistical monitoring
• PROSPERO: An international prospective register of systematic review protocols
• Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
• Providing evidence to the WHO, the experience of Cochrane Rehabilitation regarding the Rehabilitation 2030 initiative and the COVID-19 pandemic
• Providing public access to health evidence through Wikipedia
• Providing time out through dedicated fellowships: strategy to improve Cochrane author support towards review completion
• Proving clinical relevance of effects in meta-analyses of binary data
• Pseudo-trials: a method to explore the effect model
• PsiTri - A Survey of the State of the Mental Health Trials
• Psoriatic arthritis: a quantitative overview of therapeutic options
• Psychiatric adverse events in oseltamivir prophylaxis trials: novel comparative analysis using data obtained from clinical study reports
• Psychological management of procedure-related pain and distress in children
• Psychological tailoring of interventions to improve the implementation of guidelines: the case of infection prevention and control in German hospitals