• Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS): Development and validation of a new instrument
• Risk of bias assessment tools used in non-Cochrane reviews of interventions: a meta-epidemiologic study
• Risk of bias in pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
• Risk of bias in trials of chronic medical conditions. A meta-epidemiologic study
• Risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews were often inadequate
• Risk of bias of a set of primary studies across systematic reviews showed highly heterogeneous assessments: A methodological analysis within an overview
• Risk of bias of studies published as systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in cancer prevention – a systematic survey
• Risk of bias tool evaluation: process and results
• Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analysis on acupuncture in international journals
• Risk of bias tools: a systematic review of usability
• Risk of bias versus quality assessment in systematic reviews: a comparison between ROBIS and AMSTAR
• Risk of bias versus quality: application and recommendations for the Cochrane ‘Risk of bias’ tool
• Risk of bias: are judgements consistent between reviews?
• Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal complications with NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors
• Risk Prediction Models for in-hospital Mortality in Acute Aortic Dissection: A Systematic review
• Risk Ratio vs Odds Ratio: Optimal presentation in GRADE evidence profiles
• Risperidone for schizophrenia - a systematic review
• RITES: a new systematic review tool to assess the characteristics of included trials along the efficacy/effectiveness continuum
• ROB-2: A pilot test on the applicability to public health and health systems reviews and impact on GRADE ratings
• ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of non-reporting biases in systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis
• ROBIS: a new tool to assess the risk of bias in a systematic review
• RobotAnalyst: An online system to support citation screening in evidence reviewing
• Robotic research meets professional craft: Meta-ethnography exploring influences on school-based evidence-informed decision making for health, wellbeing or educational improvement
• RobotReviewer: a tool for automating evidence synthesis — development and evaluation to date, and future plans
• ROC analysis of prediction for gastric cancer development using serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori antibody tests
• Role of Cochrane reviews in informing US private payers’ medical policies
• Role of Cochrane systematic reviews in health technology assessment in Argentina
• Role of staff involvement in health and safety measures in disaster risk-reduction strategy in selected Kenyan horticulture research institutions
• Roles of contributors, panel composition, and policies for authorship in practice guideline development: a survey of guidance documents
• Room for improvement: how to validate your MEDLINE search before using it in the update
• Rotavirus vaccine for Indian children: can latest evidence modify policy guidelines in India?
• Rotavirus vaccines: a comparison of Brazilian healthcare policy and evidence from a Cochrane review
• Routine Health Information System (RHIS) interventions to improve health systems management: An EPOC- Cochrane effectiveness systematic review
• Routine piloting in systematic reviews to improve usability: a case study
• Routine preoperative investigation: results of a survey in Italy
• Routine preoperative investigation: results of a survey in Italy
• RTMAS: a computerized system for the "real-time" construction of meta-analyses using pre-extracted data from randomized control trial databases
• Running Cochrane priority setting processes: practical guidance
• Russian translations of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries: experience with and feedback from an online survey on quality and importance
• Russian translations of Cochrane Plain language summaries: quality assurance with continued feedback from an online survey
• Safe care for children: A scoping review of what we know, and what we need to find out
• Safe management of bodies of deceased persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection: a rapid systematic review
• Safety And Effectiveness Of Adding Long-Acting p2-Agonists To Inhaled Corticosteroidds In The Management Of Chronic Asthma.
• Safety of Chinese herbal medicine for stroke: a proposal for developing the framework of an evidence-based education program for clinicians
• Same quality, less time? Search methods for rapid reviews
• Sample size calculations for meta-epidemiological studies
• SAMURAI—a new statistical program for sensitivity analyses using unpublished but registered studies
• Sarcopenia and chronic renal disease: a scoping review
• Scales to assess the quality of acupuncture clinical trials: a systematic review
• Scaling the Tower of Babel; the impact of including foreign language articles in a large-scale systematic review
• Scaling up/boosting the production of scientific evidence in low and middle income countries
• Schizophrenia trials in Mexico: are we producing our own evidence?
• Scientific development and knowledge diffusion through academic leagues: the experience from vascular and endovascular surgery's academic league of UNIFESP, Brazil
• Scientific evidence and practice: Bridging the gap.A European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) project to promote Best Practice in drug addiction
• Scientific journals and evidence: What does the future hold?
• Scientific presentation: Assessing the quality of non-English language randomized controlled trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analysis
• Scientific presentation: Benefits of meta-analysis using individual patient data
• Scientific presentation: Blinding and exclusions after randomisation in controlled trials
• Scientific presentation: Systematic reviews as basis for a treatment standard for tennis elbow in general practice
• Scientific presentation: The development of a specialised trial database
• Scientific presentation: The importance of prospectively registering trials: evidence of publication bias from a cohort study of research protocols
• Scientific presentation: The role of the adequacy of effect model on the heterogeneity statistic in meta-analysis
• Scientific presentation: Who uses the Cochrane Pregnancy and Child-birth Database?
• Scientific rigor and qualitative research
• Scientometric analysis of High-cited Papers in General Practice research: 2010-2020
• SCOOPS versus PICO: testing a new framework for describing reviews of implementation research in healthcare
• Scope and consistency of outcomes reported in randomised trials included in Cochrane systematic reviews of haemodialysis
• Scope and quality of Cochrane Reviews of nutrition-related interventions
• Scope, quality and reporting of clinical practice guidelines for newborn and child health in South Africa, Nigeria, and Malawi.
• Scoping and question refinement for systematic reviews commissioned by policy customers
• Scoping exercise to map training materials currently available to support review authors
• Scoping review for informing and refining the question of a complex Cochrane review
• Scoping review of active surveillance practices for vaccine safety: the importance of identification of diverse evidence in an iterative process
• Scoping review on methodological approaches for clinical trials in “personalised medicine”
• Scoping reviews for WHO guidelines: using a two-tiered search strategy to balance efficiency and comprehensiveness
• Scoping reviews on climate-health topics: Recommendations for methods development
• Scoping reviews to inform stakeholders and policy makers: an initiative on how to prevent visits to the Emergency Department (ED) among patients with cancer
• Scoping reviews: a valuable first step in knowledge synthesis
• Scoping reviews: breaking down the what, why, and how
• Scoring the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: an example using QUADAS
• Scoring trials on the efficacy-effectiveness continuum: A systematic analysis
• Screen2Go: a pilot smartphone app for citation screening
• Screen4Me: using machine learning and citizen science for study identification in Cochrane Reviews
• Screening and the utility of textual analysis software: a retrospective study of RefVizTM
• Screening evidence for systematic reviews using a text-mining system: The RobotAnalyst
• Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: A policy brief
• Screening for decisional conflict in clinical practice: validation of SURE
• Screening for depression in pregnant and postpartum women: an individual participant data meta-analysis of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
• Screening for depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) alone and in combination with the PHQ-9: individual participant data meta-analysis
• Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer
• ScreenToGo: a mobile app to support the screening of citations
• SEA-ORCHID project in Thailand: practice and health outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among three different care level hospitals
• Search and retrieval strategies in the systematic literature search: terminologies and taxonomies in information and library sciences
• Search filter accuracy to LILACS (via iAHx 2.6-5 interface) for retrieving Randomized Controlled Trials by Brazilian Cochrane Centre
• Search filter for retrieving overviews of systematic reviews in The Cochrane Library
• Search filter to identify reports of randomised controlled trials in CINAHL
• Search filters: choosing, using and abusing
• Search filters: mapping the literature using a novel form of content analysis
• Search methods for diagnostic test accuracy reviews in dementia: an overview of a programme grant
• Search reporting: current practice and recommendations from 11 scales
• Search strategies and data sources for adverse effects reviews
• Search strategies for clinical guidelines vary in guideline development handbooks
• Search strategies for locating evaluations of health promotion initiatives
• Search strategies to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE: systematic review
• Search strategies to retrieve studies related to lowand middle-income countries (LMICs)
• Search summary table for systematic reviews (SRs)
• Search summary tables: a case study using three Cochrane Reviews of treatment options for recurrent abdominal pain in children
• Search wide and dig deep: identifying ‘views’ research for systematic reviews
• Searching a database of knowledge translation resources for public health: The Registry of Methods and Tools
• Searching a database of knowledge translation resources for public health: The Registry of Methods and Tools
• Searching and tracking in the Cochrane Register of Studies (restricted) ***In computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Searching bias in Cochrane reviews on peripartum antiretroviral therapies for preventing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
• Searching bibliographic databases: costs and benefits
• Searching Chinese biomedical databases: current practice among Cochrane reviewers
• Searching clinical trials registers: guidance and recommendations for systematic reviewers
• Searching far and wide for occupational prevention literature: Where do we go to findrelevant studies?
• Searching for and classifying non-randomized studies
• Searching for and including non-randomised trials in Cochrane reviews: is it worth the effort?
• Searching for black swans: critically assessing surrogate markers in Cochrane Reviews
• Searching for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies
• Searching for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies
• Searching for diagnostic test accuracy studies: an application to screening for open angle glaucoma (OAG)
• Searching For Evidence In Public Health Research: Which Source Is Most Effective?
• Searching for indirect evidence: advantages and challenges of extending the network of studies
• Searching for intervention studies in gastroenterology: surprisingly low incremental benefit of Embase
• Searching for qualitative primary studies: Where do we find primary studies included in Cochrane qualitative evidence syntheses
• Searching for studies
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: a core Cochrane methods introductory workshop for Cochrane Review authors and others
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: a core Cochrane methods introductory workshop for Cochrane Review authors and others
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews: an introduction
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews: an introduction
• Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Reviews: an introduction for Cochrane Review authors and others
• Searching for success in a public health intervention review
• Searching for systematic reviews of adverse effects
• Searching for systematic reviews: How easy are they to identify in biomedical databases?
• Searching for the evidence: source, time and yield
• Searching for trials - bridging the gaps
• Searching for trials in systematic reviews versus a specialist trials register: a case study comparison of source, time and costs
• Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane Reviews: cross-sectional study
• Searching for, retrieving and incorporating adverse effects data
• Searching KoreaMed: increasing the discoverability of trials conducted and published in Korea
• Searching LILACS database improves systematic reviews
• Searching LILACS database is irrelevant in systematic reviews in oncology
• Searching LILACS in Cochrane reviews: methods used and user’s feedback
• Searching MEDLINE: publication type as prima facie evidence of study design
• Searching meeting abstracts: a comparison between an experienced handsearcher and an indexed, electronic database
• Searching non-Anglophone databases I: developing a search strategy for PSYNDEX
• Searching non-Anglophone databases II: developing a search strategy for LILACS
• Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy
• Searching the Chinese literature for public health interventions: Can it add value to a systematic review?
• Searching to identify meta-analyses: it aint easy
• Searching trials registers and trials results registers
• Searching trials registers to identify relevant studies for Cochrane Reviews: verifying the optimal search approaches
• Searching trials registers to identify studies for Cochrane Reviews (restricted) ***in computer lab; no need for personal laptops
• Searching trials registries first: a fast method for finding published studies
• Secondary research first, primary research second: avoiding research waste in a humanitarian aid organization.
• Seek and ye shall find: methods for obtaining unpublished data
• Seizing opportunities: engaging policy makers in evidence informed discussions, planning and policy making
• Selecting Cochrane Reviews to be developed as Cochrane Clinical Answers: what selection criteria should we use?
• Selecting methods to display graphically the results of systematic reviews: where is the evidence?
• Selecting statistical methods for meta-analyzing diagnostic accuracy data: an online survey
• Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatment meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews
• Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatments meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews
• Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?
• Selecting tools to assist general practitioners in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of work-related mental health conditions
• Selection Bias in Preterm Cohort Studies Overestimates Survival: A Systematic Review
• Selection in reported epidemiological risks
• Selective cutoff reporting in depression screening accuracy studies: a comparison of meta-analysis of published cutoffs only versus all cutoffs
• Selective cutoff reporting in diagnostic test accuracy studies of depression screening tools: comparing traditional meta-analysis to individual patient data meta-analysis
• Selective publication of clinical trials and legal response: The right to health and information
• Selective reporting of outcome data: are we following the Cochrane Handbook guidance?
• Selective reporting of outcomes of drug trials? Comparison of study protocols and published articles
• Selective reporting of results in government-funded randomised trials
• Selective reporting of the primary outcomes of clinical trials: a follow-up study
• Selective reporting: a proxy or a more direct indicator of our confidence in the summary estimates?
• Selective searching for high-quality health-related evidence syntheses – more bias or time gained?
• Self care interventions: which outcomes are important to consumers?
• Semi-automated data extraction workbench for environmental health
• Semi-automating citation screening: a retrospective assessment of a hybrid machine learning/crowdsourced approach using one year’s worth of human-generated data from the Embase crowdsourcing project
• Sense and sensibility: automated clustering to code studies across health and social care systematic reviews
• Sensitivity analysis in systematic reviews of qualitative evidence: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review
• Sensitivity and precision of ‘practice guideline[pt]’ in PubMed
• Sensitivity and precision of terms in Phases I, II and III of the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) for identifying reports of randomized trials in Africa in HIV/AIDS in MEDLINE
• Sensitivity and specificity do vary with disease prevalence: implications for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
• Sensitivity and specificity rarely vary with prevalence
• Sensitivity of a search filter designed to identify studies reporting health state utility values
• Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation
• Sensitivity of treatment decisions to bias adjustment in network meta-analysis
• Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of using abstracts to identify RCTs of asthma educational interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE
• Separating fact from fiction: Enhancing critical thinking to equip the next generation for the post-truth society
• Sequential meta-analysis research tracks (SMART): a step-by-step algorithm to conduct smart meta-analyses
• Setting of an observatory of clinical trial transition regarding data sharing – IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trials data) Observatory
• Setting priorities for Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation
• Setting priorities for Cochrane Reviews on Multiple Sclerosis
• Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on the management of primary angle closure (PAC): A survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians
• Setting priorities for primary research: disaggregating systematic review data to inform the Healthy Lives Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI)
• Setting research priorities with multiple professions and service users