• Quality in reporting adverse events and the PRISMA Harms Extension
• Quality measures of included studies for Cochrane reviews - beyond randomization and blinding
• Quality of Brazilian Ministry of Health clinical practice guidelines: How can we improve?
• Quality of clinical heterogeneity investigations in systematic reviews: an assessment of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
• Quality of clinical research: a systematic review of definitions and development of a comprehensive framework of indicators
• Quality of Cochrane systematic review abstracts; readability and comparison with handbook guidelines
• Quality of descriptions of rehabilitation interventions in low back pain: a review of published randomized controlled trials
• Quality of evidence for bias from attributes of study design
• Quality of evidence gap between adult and paediatric guidelines
• Quality of evidence in main comparisons of Cochrane intervention reviews
• Quality of evidence informing clinical guidelines on treatment of opioid dependence
• Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
• Quality of evidence matters: is it reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
• Quality of evidence: are Cochrane review authors speaking the same language?
• Quality of guideline recommendations about physical activity and exercise to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and critical appraisal
• Quality of health information in Web 2.0
• Quality of healthcare provided in a task-shifting health system: Experience from a mobile health service in a southern African country
• Quality of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Thai healthcare journals
• Quality of Randomised Clinical Trials Affects Estimates of Intervention Efficacy
• Quality of randomised controlled trials included in meta-analyses: how often and how is it assessed?
• Quality of report of the clinical quantitative research by area of investigation on the Revista Médica de Chile between years 2017-2021
• Quality of reporting and of methods in studies on treatment of ulcers caused by nerve damage in leprosy
• Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A survey of three clinical specialities
• Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices
• Quality of reporting of clinical prediction model studies: adherence to TRIPOD
• Quality of reporting of clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine for vascular dementia
• Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
• Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in medical laboratory journals
• Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and its affect on estimates of intervention effectiveness
• Quality of reporting of trials abstracts needs to be improved: a survey of four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine
• Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: what authors, reviewers and consumers should consider
• Quality of statistical methods reported in randomised-controlled trials of type-2 diabetes (T2DM) published in 2016
• Quality of studies published as systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in cancer prevention – a systematic methodological survey
• Quality of studies published as systematic reviews or meta-analyses in Polish journals listed on Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
• Quality of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes identified within a systematic review on low-dose rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
• Quality of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy on Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias
• Quality of systematic reviews of the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group: can we improve it?
• Quality of systematic reviews used to build guidelines on prevention and treatment of breast and colorectal cancers
• Quality of the reporting of Brazilian Ministry of Health updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGU) versions: Applying checkUP
• Quality of the reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary interventions
• Quality of the systematic reviews of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis Group
• Quality of trials of life-style interventions underpinning two national clinical guidelines
• Quality of warfarin control and the risk of stroke, bleeding and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation
• Quality Predictors of Randomised Clinical Trials Published in the 'Hepatology' Journal
• Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
• Quality scoring of diagnostic articles for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines
• Quality scoring of randomized controlled trials for the development of evidence-based practice guidelines
• Quantification of bias in the results of non-randomised studies compared with randomised studies
• Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health
• Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analyses
• Quantifying how diagnostic test accuracy depends on threshold in a meta-analysis
• Quantifying the evidence gap in stroke rehabilitation
• Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics
• Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as patient input in a health-technology assessment on Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)
• Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for inclusion in a mixed studies review: an update of the quantitizing proposition
• Quantity and Quality of Health Economics Literature in Health Technology Assessment.
• Quasi-randomisation in emergency setting trials: a recipe for selection bias, or an efficient approach?
• Quaternary prevention - the role of Point-of-Care tools
• Question CF: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in cystic fibrosis shared decision making
• Question formulation and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews: Accuracy and beyond
• Questionable Beauty Of Prevention - Case Of Overweight Prevention
• Questionable early stopping: Case study of supplemental perioperative oxygen and the incidence of surgical site infection
• Questioning the methodological superiority of ‘placebo’ over ‘active’ controlled trials
• Quick on the draw: producing a sound evidence base to a tight time scale
• Raising awareness about the Cochrane Collaboration and South African Cochrane Centre in Ethiopia
• Random reflections on Archie Cochrane
• Random-effects meta-analyses should be optimal - not traditional
• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
• Randomised and controlled clinical trials in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register and their inclusion in Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group systematic reviews
• Randomised clinical trials on acupuncture in the Korean literature: bibliometric analysis and methodological quality
• Randomised clinical trials with negative results: Is there an increase in their reporting?
• Randomised clinical trials: advantages and limitations of using parallel-group design or cross-over designs in the field of methylphenidate for ADHD
• Randomised controlled trials in nephrology: are more and better needed?
• Randomised controlled trials of surgical procedures in children: a cross-sectional study
• Randomised-controlled trials are particularly scarce and underpowered in the setting of rare diseases: Further acquisition of knowledge is needed
• Randomized clinical trials of the impact of alternative diagnostic strategies on patient-important outcomes: a systematic survey
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for policy interventions? A review of reviews and meta-regression
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in certain collagen vascular diseases
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rehabilitation research
• Randomized Controlled Trials in "Chinese Journal of Digestion " - A Handsearching of 1981-1998
• Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases" - a handsearching of 1983~1997
• Randomized controlled trials in "Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases" between 1991 and 1999
• Randomized controlled trials in the leading Chinese internal medical journals
• Randomized controlled trials of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment in Africa: results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register
• Randomized controlled trials relevant to viral hepatitis in the Chinese literature
• Randomized trials of neurosurgical interventions: a systematic appraisal
• Randomized Trials Versus Observational Studies in Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention
• Rank‐Heat Plot: An R Shiny tool for presenting multiple network meta-analysis outcomes
• Ranking of evidence in network meta-analysis results in misleading conclusion - a case study
• Ranking of Evidence in Network Meta-Analysis Results in Misleading Conclusion -A Case Study.
• Ranking Outcome Variables and Comparing the Design of Eligible Studies with Current Standard of Care: Two Steps Towards Assessing Relevance of Existing Research
• Ranking the relative importance of health-related outcomes for periodic health examinations - a comparison of citizens and medical experts
• Rapid Cochrane reviews: ‘live testing’ of the concept in a Cochrane Review Group and observations on rapid editorial processes
• Rapid evidence identification in reviews of post-COVID syndrome: inclusion of preprint sources and timeliness of review completion
• Rapid evidence reviews: the CADTH experience
• Rapid evidence synthesis for COVID-19 international guidance: a World Health Organization commissioned Cochrane rapid scoping review
• Rapid needs appraisal to inform outbreak response research
• Rapid production of a series of evidence reviews for a Dutch policy maker: highlights from the obstructive sleep apnea comorbidities initiative
• Rapid qualitative reviews (RQRs): what, why, how and where next?
• Rapid review definition and methods: two scoping reviews
• Rapid review methods: a systematic scoping review
• Rapid review on child food insecurity: challenges encountered
• Rapid review on the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers caring for patients with filovirus disease
• Rapid review programs and methods research: description and discussion of the experiences from among Convenors of the Cochrane Methods Rapid Reviews Group
• Rapid review programs to support healthcare and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods
• Rapid review report on early COVID-19 status in Republic of Korea and global pandemic
• Rapid Review workshop: timely evidence synthesis for decision makers
• Rapid reviews can increase use of evidence by health system decision-makers’ with fast-paced needs: the VA ESP experience
• Rapid reviews in rapid learning health systems
• Rapid reviews of healthcare interventions (2018-2019): A scoping review
• Rapid reviews to inform Ebola preparedness efforts at hospitals
• Rapid reviews to inform health policy decisions using Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Rapid reviews to inform state health policy decisions
• Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems
• Rapid reviews workshop: developing timely evidence summaries for decision makers
• Rapid reviews, how much do they comply with Cochrane recommendations in their methodology to provide reliable evidence?
• Rapid reviews: appropriateness and applicability
• Rapid reviews: one size fits all?
• Rapid Synthesis for health policies: Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents.
• Rapid-review process to identify priorities for updating published guidelines
• Rapid, rapid, rapid…how reliable is a single screener? A crowd-based, randomized methods study (Part 1)
• Rapid, rapid, rapid…how reliable is a single screener? A crowd-based, randomized methods study (Part 2)
• Rasch analysis of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire for women with breast cancer
• Rate and time to the publication of Latin American systematic reviews indexed in PROSPERO: A meta-epidemiological study.
• Rates per woman versus rates per cycle: The importance of relevant outcome measures in subfertility.
• Rating quality of evidence using Cochrane/GRADE approach: sub-group analysis
• Rating the methodological quality of randomised controlled trials
• Rating the quality of evidence in Cochrane network meta-analysis: a cross-sectional study
• Rating the quality of evidence using GRADE approach
• Rating the quality of the evidence for the studies that evaluate the importance of the outcomes of interest
• Ratio of geometric means to analyze continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: comparison to mean differences and ratio of (arithmetic) means using empiric data and simulation
• Ratio of means as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study
• Rationale for the development of Cochrane Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
• Rationale for the preparation of a vaccines library
• Rationale for writing a teaching book on elemental skills for critically reading biomedical literature for low- and medium-income countries
• Rayyan: a systematic reviews web app for exploring and filtering searches for eligible studies for Cochrane Reviews
• Rayyan: from Hyderabad to Seoul
• RCT databases - reducing research wastage from the systematic review process
• RCT Rehabilitation Checklist - RCTRACK: Project for a reporting guideline for RCTs in rehabilitation
• RCTs for policy interventions? A review of reviews
• Re use of extracted data – an ontology-based approach
• Re-analysing equity in a Cochrane review: Smoking cessation in pregnancy
• Re-analysis of meta-analyses in Cochrane reviews using robust statistical methods
• Re-assessing and revising 'levels of evidence' in the critical appraisal process
• Re-strategizing evidence to policy translation for accelerated utilization of evidence by healthcare consumers in India
• Reaching certainty: a descriptive study of ‘stable’ Cochrane Reviews and coming to firm conclusions
• Reaching people with direct experience of epilepsy to prioritise topics for Cochrane Systematic Reviews: discussion of approach, results and impact on Review Group work plans
• Reaching the end users through effective and safe patient-centred health care - what CCNet can provide
• READ-It project: catalysing influential nutrition evidence synthesis and capacity building in LMICs
• Readability assessment of plain language summaries in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
• Readability of Cochrane Breast Cancer Group plain language summaries
• Readability of different formats of information about Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
• Readability, linguistic characteristics and conclusiveness of Cochrane plain language summaries: a cross-sectional study
• Readiness of Parliaments to engage with the Sustainable Development Goals: Implementability of the Inter-Parliamentary Union's Self-Assessment Toolkit
• Real-world effectiveness of long-acting injections for reducing recurrent hospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia
• Realist review and synthesis of policy intervention studies aimed at reducing exposures to environmental hazards
• Realist review: an introductory workshop
• Realities of practice: engaging parents and general practitioners in developing clinical practice guidelines
• Reappraisal of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research: updating the STARD guideline
• Reasons for disagreements in 'Risk of bias' assessment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in more than one Cochrane review
• Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study
• Reasons for Randomized Controlled Trial Retraction and their impact on Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-sectional Study
• Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
• Recent clinical practice guidelines on hypertension management do not refer to relevant Cochrane reviews
• Recent methods in meta-analysis: a case study of synthesis of evidence on emerging health technologies
• Reclassifying reviews on the basis of recommendation and results: steps towards a user friendly interface
• Recognising delirium in hospitalised children: A systematic review of risk factors and characteristics of acute paediatric delirium
• Recommendation for axillary lymph node dissection in women with early breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A systematic review of randomised-controlled trials using the GRADE system
• Recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: A methodological review
• Recommendations for the development, piloting and use of data extraction sheets in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
• Recommendations for updates to the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias assessment tool, based on an evaluation of its initial implementation
• Recommendations to keep a living systematic review alive during a pandemic
• Reconceptualising searching and screening: How new technologies might change the way in which we identify studies
• Rede NATJus: a blog providing content on EBM and HTA for professionals involved with judicialisation on healthcare in Brazil
• Redesigning the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for identifying RCTs in MEDLINE using statistical analysis to improve sensitivity and precision
• Reduce and recycle: Examining relevant, existing synthesised evidence to avoid research waste and refine the preparation of new systematic reviews
• Reducing Bias and Increasing Power by Imputing Missing Standard Deviations for Continuous Outcomes in Systematic Reviews
• Reducing duplication: an example of collaboration between guideline developers and Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups
• Reducing labour and time in creating a systematic review for Japanese rehabilitation nutrition guideline by using artificial intelligence and social networks
• Reducing unnecessary cervical cancer screening: achieving more by doing less
• Reduction in use of human albumin: Who mediated the change in response to what?
• Redundant Clinical Trials Challenging Research Ethics and Hurting Patients
• Redundant trials: do researchers register clinical trials for outcomes that have a 'high' GRADE evidence rating?
• Reference-based and study-based registers: some answers? more questions?
• Refinement of search filters to reduce information overload when retrieving evidence on variations in practice for NICE Quality Standards
• Reflections on embedding patient and consumer involvement in the PaReNt project
• Reflections on stakeholder engagement in a systematic review of effectiveness: integrating the voice of healthcare users
• Reflections on the use of a novel framework synthesis approach to complete a rapid review of qualitative evidence
• RefTraK - The Cochrane Stroke Group's Specialised Register Management System: A Powerful Tool for Supporting Reviewers
• Refugee crisis in health and society
• Regional Review Group Co-ordinator - a way to recruit and support reviewers to get reviews done?
• Register & handsearch submissions for CENTRAL: all you need is trials!
• Registered paediatric trials worldwide: frequency, location and focus
• Registered trials of traditional Chinese medicine in China: current status and issues
• Registration of randomized controlled trials published in PubMed indexed journals: a cross-sectional analysis
• Registry of medical and technological documents as a database of evidence-based medicine in Ukraine (Registry of MTD)
• Registry-based observational studies of the management and outcome of cancer: a new way to look at old problems
• Regulatory and road-engineering interventions for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities among vulnerable road users in low- and middle-income countries
• REH-COVER (Rehabilitation – COVID-19 Evidence-based Response) action: a “rapid” and “living” systematic review methodology
• Rehabilitation and Cochrane: A difficult relationship