• Meta-ethnography reporting Guidance (eMERGe)
• Meta-regression for complex questions that are not directly addressed in the available literature.
• Meta-research evaluation of clinical trials of breastmilk substitutes
• Metaanalysis of the perioperative prophylaxis of ceftriaxon versus other cepalosporins
• MetaDTA and MetaBayesDTA: Interactive web applications to conduct meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• MetaDTA and MetaBayesDTA: interactive web applications to conduct meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• metaepi: an R package for conducting meta-epidemiologic studies
• MetaInsight and MetaCNMA: Interactive user-friendly “point and click” web application to conduct network meta-analysis and component network meta-analysis
  
• MetaInsight: An interactive user-friendly “point and click” web application to conduct network meta-analysis
• MetaInsight: an interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating and visualizing network meta-analyses
• MetaLight: freely available online software for teaching and learning meta-analysis
• metan: a comprehensive update to the popular user-written meta-analysis package for Stata
• MetaPROM – Enhancing the interpretation of Meta-analyses of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures through a Microsoft Excel-based statistical software program
• Metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analyses
• Method and tools for implementing comparative effectiveness research: a Dutch example
• Method for Assuring PICO(T) Completeness for Comprehensive Guidelines
• Methodological adequacy of articles published in two open-access Brazilian cardiology periodicals
• Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study
• Methodological and reporting quality of indirect comparisons
• Methodological and Reporting Quality of Meta-analyses in the Field of Screening
• Methodological and Reporting Quality of Network Meta-analyses in the Field of Nutrition
• Methodological and reporting quality of pharmacoepidemiology studies using the target trial emulation framework: a systematic review
• Methodological and reporting quality of RCTs in social work: A cross-sectional survey
  
• Methodological and reporting quality of search strategies of systematic reviews evaluating the therapeutic use of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogues. Meta-epidemiological study
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dermatology: a cross-sectional study
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on aesthetics and reconstructive breast surgery. A meta-research.
• Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on influenza
• Methodological approaches for developing and reporting Living Evidence synthesis
• Methodological aspects of a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathic treatment strategies
• Methodological aspects of randomized trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) concerning the treatment of suicide attempters
• Methodological assessment of cost-effectiveness studies of treatment with biologicals of severe asthma: a systematic review [MeCoBiA].
• Methodological challenges associated with network meta-analyses: The experience of the Musculoskeletal Group
• Methodological challenges encountered in undertaking an evidence and gap map of health and social care interventions in the ‘oldest old’
• Methodological challenges in a scoping review of adaptation to climate change
• Methodological challenges in conducting systematic reviews to increase the physical activity level of communities
• Methodological challenges in performing network meta-analyses using data from Cochrane intervention reviews: are data across reviews reliable and consistent?
• Methodological challenges in randomised trials of mHealth interventions: survey, expert workshop, and recommendations
  
• Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: survey, expert workshop, and recommendations
• Methodological challenges of the outcomes—reflections from a review of ICT-based prompting among patients with schizophrenia
• Methodological challenges regarding climate change and health in evidence-based medicine- Presentation of discussions from the german congress for EbM 2023
• Methodological challenges to assess effectiveness of treatments with retrospective studies : the case of localized prostate cancer
• Methodological challenges when quantifying a mortality reduction with screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm when incidence is falling: a registry study
• Methodological characteristics of systematic reviews of prevalence
• Methodological compromises and their implications in a rapid review of qualitative evidence: A worked example
• Methodological considerations for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies
• Methodological criteria for regulating orphan drugs for rare diseases: have EBM concepts been adopted? Zolgensma®’s case study.
• Methodological developments and statistic software used in diagnostic systematic reviews in China
• Methodological difficulties in overview of reviews due to inconsistent reporting of outcomes: a case study of reviews on pharmacological treatments for asthma
• Methodological eligibility challenges in evidence synthesis of the prevalence of mental health problems in health care workers during COVID-19
• Methodological evaluation of randomized controlled trials for Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese medical literature
• Methodological Evaluation on Randomized Controlled Trials for Viral Hepatitis in Chinese Medical Literature
• Methodological filters for the identification of delayed cross-sectional studies
• Methodological insights from a prognostic factor exemplar review: individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain
• Methodological issues from peer reviewed Chinese systematic reviews
• Methodological issues in rehabilitation research: a scoping review
• Methodological issues in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies
• Methodological issues in using published incidence trends in a systematic review of overdiagnosis in mammography screening
• Methodological issues on evidence review for public health intervention in Republic of Korea
• Methodological limitations in the trials of iron supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in children
• Methodological overview: meta-analyses of adverse effects data from case-control studies as compared to other observational studies
• Methodological perspectives on a realist synthesis: An explanatory analysis of the effectiveness of female genital mutilation-cutting abandonment efforts
• Methodological quality and sample size of randomised trials published in 'Gastroenterology'.
• Methodological quality and treatment effects in randomised trials: a review of six empirical studies
• Methodological quality assessment of comparative test accuracy studies
• Methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of hyperthyroidism treatment
• Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of interventions on diabetic nephropathy
• Methodological quality assessment should move beyond design specificity
• Methodological quality of accepted and rejected papers submitted to three leading biomedical journals
• Methodological quality of clinical trials evaluated in early benefit assessment: orphan versus non-orphan drugs
• Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: What's missing in QUADAS
• Methodological quality of education meta-analyses: A meta-review
• Methodological quality of malaria RCTs conducted in Africa
• Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study
• Methodological quality of multiple treatments or network meta-analyses (MTAs) in type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
• Methodological quality of negative versus positive studies
• Methodological Quality of Non-Randomized Intervention Studies
• Methodological quality of practice guidelines produced by scientific society: a need for improvement?
• Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in paediatric oncology published in 2001 and 2002
• Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials of Chinese medicinal herbs for treating influenza
• Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain
• Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain
• Methodological quality of randomized controlled intervention trials of spinal disorders
• Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials on gastric cancer treated with traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on interventional in leading Chinese evidence-based medical journals
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic kidney disease
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in public health policy: one case of human resources
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in public health policy: one case of human resources
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Alzheimer's disease treatments
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine published in Chinese language between 2021-2022: a cross-sectional study
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on physical exercise for breast cancer patients. Meta-epidemiological study.
• Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Treatments for Osteoporosis: A Cross-sectional Study
• Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional study
• Methodological quality, rigour, and transparency of systematic reviews: a review of reviews using an evidence gap map approach
• Methodological requirements for searching for studies for Cochrane Reviews: an update on the MECIR standards
• Methodological requirements for searching for studies for Cochrane Reviews: ensuring that new Cochrane Reviews meet the MECIR standards
• Methodological review of items for assessing the risk of bias in network meta-analyses provides groundwork for the creation of an extension to the ROBIS tool
• Methodological rigour of systematic reviews used to inform the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
• Methodological search filters to identify prognosis studies: A systematic review of development and evaluation studies
• Methodological strategies for the synthesis of complex interventions – oral health education programmes for nursing staff and residents
• Methodological strengths and limitations of the realist synthesis approach to systematic reviews—a promising methodology for the Cochrane Collaboration?
• Methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX
• Methodological tasks of clinical practice guidelines developed in Japan
• Methodology and quality of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine
• Methodology and terminology used in evidence-informed guidelines in Oral Health: a systematic survey
• Methodology Clinic
• Methodology for developing the Public Health Agency of Canada Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections Guidelines
• Methodology of animal studies and impact on aggregating data: why meta-analyses might be inappropriate for preclinical studies
• Methodology of meta-analyses published in leading general and specialist journals, 1993 - 2002: bibliographic study
• Methodology of subgroup analyses used in individual patient data meta-analyses versus meta-analyses on published data
• Methods and characteristics of network meta-analyses using diagnostic test accuracy studies
• Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data
• Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review
• Methods and processes for the production of Cochrane Rapid Reviews
• Methods and statistics tutorials: an innovative approach to capacity building in evidence synthesis
• Methods development for a new initiative - aerospace medicine systematic review group
• Methods for assess validity of diagnostic tests in rare diseases
• Methods for assessing the sustained use of research evidence in practice
• Methods for Cochrane reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
• Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: an evidence map of the literature
• Methods for configurational synthesis: extensions to traditional meta-analysis for addressing intervention complexity and contextual variation in reviews
• Methods for configurational synthesis: extensions to traditional meta-analysis for addressing intervention complexity and contextual variation in reviews
• Methods for Data Extraction and Data Transformation in Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSRs)
  
• Methods for data extraction from figures in protocols of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Methods for developing software to support systematic review development: the JBI SUMARI example
• Methods for handling missing participant data in systematic reviews of dichotomous outcome data: a case example of plausible and extreme plausible assumptions
• Methods for identifying and displaying gaps in clinical research
• Methods for including non-randomised studies to answer questions about unintended harms of drugs
• Methods for including non-randomized studies in a network meta-analysis
• Methods for individual participant data meta-analysis of relative treatment effects: a methodologic overview
• Methods for measuring the patient's perspective in Evidence-based Medicine
• Methods for synthesising qualitative data
• Methods for synthesizing & integrating qualitative evidence
• Methods for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
• Methods for the assessment of the effectiveness of treatment sequences for clinical and economic decision making
• Methods for the evaluation of the implementation of a rapid-recommendation on COVID-19 treatment
• Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests
• Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a methodological survey
• Methods of evidence mapping: a systematic review
• Methods of guideline adaptation: a review of guideline development guidance
• Methods of identifying and displaying gaps in health research
• Methods of mobilizing collective intelligence through crowdsourcing: a scoping review
• Methods of systematic reviews of prognosis: results of a 'Review of Reviews'
• Methods to analyze continuous outcomes by incorporating baseline data in individual participant data meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
• Methods to enhance comprehensiveness of large Cochrane reviews: a practical example
• Methods to facilitate the interpretation of pooled diagnostic test accuracy estimates by means of selecting a representative pre-test probability
• Methods to improve the retention of participants in clinical trials: a methodological review
• Methods to involve medical students from developing countries in Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs): preliminary experiences from China
• Methods to reduce reporting bias in Cochrane reviews
• Methods to synthesize evidence across trials reporting multiple behavioral outcomes
• Methods used for the conduct of rapid reviews on diagnostic tests: a scoping review
• Methods used in adaptation of health–related guidelines: A systematic survey
• Methods used in systematic reviews to conceptualise dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions: umbrella review
• Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents: assessment of harmful effects in non-randomised studies
• Methylphenidate for improving academic performance in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – a systematic review of observational studies
• Methylxanthines for apnea of prematurity: is a broad systematic review needed?
• Microsimulation-informed guideline: an example of lung cancer screening in China
  
• Minding the qualitative and feeling the width: identifying qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews
• Minimal clinically important differences in acute pain
• Minimal clinically important differences in chronic pain
• Minimal important difference for the EQ-5D and impact on decision making in a clinical guideline
• Minimal important difference in meta-analyses: Applying anchor-based and distribution-based methods to increase precision
• Minimally important difference estimates and assessment of its credibility for patient reported outcomes in adults: a systematic survey
• Minimally important difference estimates and assessment of their credibility for patient-reported outcomes in adults: A systematic survey
• Minimally important difference estimates for patient reported outcomes in pediatrics: a systematic survey
• Minimising the impact of reporting bias by using data from clinical study reports for the determining the drop-out rates in antidepressant trials
• Mining the information overload: a scoping review of patients’ responses to different forms of health risk information
• Misinformation in COVID-19: nimble innovation within Cochrane to appraise the source
• Misleading reporting in major fertility journals: poor use of confidence intervals and absolute differences
• Misleading results even after adjustment for a dozen covariates: a comparison between 'real world' analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in telecardiology
• Mismatch between health priorities and publicly funded clinical research: The Chilean case
  
• Mismatch between overall and pairwise overlap analysis in a sample of overviews: A methodological review
• Misrepresentation and overinterpretation of results in clinical studies evaluating biomarkers in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of ‘spin’
• Missing and masked: equity in a systematic review of remote interventions for substance misuse.
• Missing data in meta-analysis - a practical guide
• Missing data in meta-analysis: a practical guide
• Missing Data in Systematic Reviews: A table might help
• Missing the wood for the trees: clinically relevant outcome measures in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation, a review of reviews
• Mixed method systematic review - an appropriate method for generating more knowledge about rare diseases?
• Mixed studies reviews: types of synthesis designs used to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence
• Mixed treatment comparison analysis of seven treatments for acute myocardial infarction
• Mixed-methods synthesis for community-level public health interventions: Some considerations from a review of skin cancer prevention
• Mixing with the 'unclean’: Including non-Cochrane reviews alongside Cochrane reviews in overviews of reviews
• Mobile applications in the comprehensive management of acute and chronic complications of patients with diabetes: systematic review of the literature
• Mobilizing the evidence synthesis community around planetary health: challenges and opportunities
• Model construction of Health Technology Reassessment (HTR) in Korea using systematic review of HTR systems in four countries
• Model-based network meta-analysis for time-course relationships: A union of two methodologies
• Modeling treatment effects on patient-important outcomes from surrogate markers in systematic reviews: the case of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B
• Modelling to assist knowledge translation of diagnostic test accuracy reviews (DTARs): a necessary evil?
• Moderate-term, low dose corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis
• Modifiable factors influencing recruitment in clinical trials
• Modifications to the Risk of Bias tool: a case study of 204 trials
• Modified and true intention to treat analysis: reporting of methodologic quality of randomised controlled trials
• Modified Intention to Treat: frequency, definition and implication for clinical trials
• Money, support and guidance for reviewers
• Monitoring Process Barriers and Enablers towards Universal Health Coverage within the Sustainable Development Goals
• Monte Carlo simulations: an objective tool to identify problematic randomization in Cochrane review
• Monte Carlo simulations: an objective tool to identify problematic randomization in Cochrane Reviews
• Moral distress of hematology ward nurses at a university hospital in Japan: a best practice implementation project