• Performing and disseminating review findings through art and design
• Performing meta-analyses in the case of very few studies
• Peritoneal lavage for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of randomized trials
• Permutation based resampling for deriving p-vlaues for pooled effect estimates in meta-analsyes
• Perpetuation of inappropriate meta-analysis methods? Analysis of systematic reviews cited by systematic reviews
• Personalising research priority setting exercises: developing a research priority setting exercise to achieve the objectives of a Cochrane entity
• Personalized music for residents with dementia in a long term care setting. Putting wheels on the evidence from the ALOIS database
• Personally tailored, multilingual, up-to-date evidence-based summaries of effects of care, when and where you want it: an EU bid
• Pharmaceutical Industry sponsorship of research: Independence or Interference?
• Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies (Updated Review)
• Pharmacological interventions for chronic non­specific low back pain: an overview of reviews
• Pharmacological interventions for management and prevention of delirium in intensive care patients: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
• Pharmacological interventions for primary insomnia in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
• Pharmacotherapy recommendations for obesity: a cross-sectional survey
• Physical activity recommendations for obesity: a cross-sectional survey
• Physical Activity: How well does systematic-review evidence on physical activity interventions reflect the expressed views of older people?
• Physical activity/exercise for health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
• Physical activity/exercise for health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
• Physical synthetic models for medical education: a Cochrane vision and simulators for low-income countries
• Physicians' knowledge of sepsis in the Brazilian Amazon Region. They urgently need continuous, but short and objective evidence-based educational interventions
• Physicians’ knowledge of evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ischemic stroke in the Brazilian Amazon region
• Physicians’ willingness to ration health care: a systematic review of survey findings
• Physiotherapeutic interventions in cerebral palsy: effectiveness and current practice
• Physiotherapy for shoulder pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
• PICO annotation of intervention reviews: how to get it done! A case study of Cochrane Airways
• PICO annotation: harnessing crowds and experts in making health evidence more discoverable and re-usable
• PICO searching with enriched metadata in the Cochrane Library: a community discussion
• PICO+: extending the Cochrane PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) ontology to encompass diversity of populations, settings and modes of delivery of interventions
• Piecewise linear model for investigating the dose-response relationship in meta-analysis: methodology, examples and comparison
• Piloting living systematic reviews in traumatic brain injury
• Piloting realist review methods to assess cost-effectiveness within he context of a systematic review
• Piloting the Informed Health Choices (IHC) School Resources in China
• Piloting the Informed Health Choices primary school resources in Barcelona schools
• Piloting the Informed Health Choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study
• Placebo effect in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: the more placebos per day, the better the healing?
• Placebo, usual care and wait-list interventions for all mental health disorders
• Placebo, usual care and wait-list interventions for mental health disorders
• Plagiarism: Cochrane’s policy and its application
• Plain language summaries as tools for raising awareness of Cochrane evidence and social media as dissemination channels in Poland
• Plain language summaries in social media in Poland
• Plain language summaries of published health research articles: how well are we doing?
• Plain Language Summaries’ dissemination in Polish context.
• Plain language summary format for Cochrane reviews: results of user testing
• Planning an evidence based mental health service - Is it possible?
• Planning and conducting a priority setting exercise for a Cochrane entity
• Planning and reporting of quality of life outcomes in cancer trials: a retrospective cohort study
• Planning and reporting of subgroup analyses in randomized trials—between confidence and delusion
• Planning future studies based on the precision of network meta-analysis results
• Platform trials during the COVID-19 pandemic – Challenges in identification and maintenance in the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (CCSR)
• Plotting guidelines, tools and initiatives on the quality cycle of 30 subjects to improve care and co-operation
• PLUGGED-IN (providing likeable and understandable guidelines using GRADE in the EMR with direct links to individual patient data) phase 2
• Policy 'buddies': policymaker and researcher engagement for evidence-informed policy
• Policy buddies: baseline assessment of the institutional capacity for evidence informed decisions in provincial health departments in South Africa
• Policy BUDDIES: lessons learnt by researchers engaging in 'buddying' with provincial policymakers in South Africa to advance evidence-informed decision-making
• Policy involvement in systematic reviews: motivation, support and procedures
• Policy relevant summaries - encouraging and supporting Australian policy makers to use Cochrane reviews
• Policymakers’ familiarity with and preference for overall quality of evidence definitions
• Pooled risk differences - a comparison between estimates from randomised controlled trials and estimates from propensity score-matched non-RCTs
• Pooled standardised mean differences and estimated heterogeneity between trials depend on the type of assessment tool analysed: Meta-epidemiological study
• Pooling biological specimens in primary studies compromises evidence generation in test accuracy reviews: a case study
• Pooling continuous data: Methods for skewed data
• Pooling cost data from systematic reviews of economic studies
• Pooling diagnostic publications: watch for outliers!
• Pooling results from epidemiological studies using dose-response meta-analysis
• Poor description of non-drug interventions: a remediable barrier to usage of evidence in practice?
• Poor interpretation of quality assessment results in diagnostic accuracy reviews
• Poor reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Risk of Bias Tool in physical therapy trials
• Poor reporting and variability in comparator interventions in behavioural trials: A systematic review of smoking cessation interventions
• Poor reporting of reasons for termination in clinical trials registered in Clinical Trial Registry of India
• Popularization of Cochrane evidence in Croatia: the Cochrane podcast project
• Population-based STD interventions to prevent HIV transmission: A systematic review
• Possibilities of standardisation for rapid reviews – proposal for the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
• Possible Bias in Selecting Interventions for Consumers Based on Effect Estimates
• Possible bias presenting the results of systematic reviews: An example and a suggested solution.
• Possible misleading conclusions due to inappropriate approach in dealing with data extraction from factorial design randomized trials
• Post COVID-19 – lessons from a living systematic literature search on treatment and rehabilitation
• Postpartum domperidone use: what is the added value of observational and preclinical data in an assessment of potential benefits versus harm?
• Postpartum period: Mothers’ knowledge and hesitancy regarding vaccinations
• Potential bias should be explicitly included in systematic reviews
• Potential Effectiveness and Safety of Antiviral Agents in COVID-19: A Rapid Review
• Potential factors for influencing fulfilling of Cochrane reviews related to Chinese medicine
• Potential for impact of Cochrane-style systematic reviews in the field of veterinary public health
• Potential impact of English-language limits in systematic reviews
• Potential of Cochrane reviews to inform self-care: Developing a model for a systematic assessment
• Potentially misleading reporting of comparisons in Cochrane systematic reviews and in major general medical journals
• Power calculations to help plan individual participant data meta-analysis projects
• Powering transformative change through collaborative action: The Healthcare Information for All Strategy
• Practical advice for accessing patient-level data from a data sharing platform for evidence synthesis
• Practical and conceptual issues of trial registration
• Practical approaches to building capacity for Cochrane branches and evidence-informed health policy-making in resource-limited settings
• Practical approaches to conducting an evidence-informed research priority setting exercise
• Practical implications of assessing the risk of bias in a Cochrane review with alternative tools
• Practical issues with collecting individual patient data for meta-analysis: the experience of the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration
• Practical study on an interprofessional education programme for clinical research literacy through writing Cochrane Systematic Reviews with information and communication technology
• Practical tips for peer reviewing diagnostic test accuracy review searches
• Practical tools and guidance on conducting systematic reviews of complex interventions
• Practice of rapid evidence synthesis among systematic review authors in the Ministry of Health, Malaysia
• Practice-driving evidence: how frequently does it change?
• Practising reflexivity in systematic reviews – what can we learn from qualitative research for all types of reviews?
• Practitioner research – what is it and how can we use it in evidence reviews and guideline development
• Pragmatic comparison of the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy and the HEDGES Team strategies in four electronic databases
• Pre-specifying sample size calculations and statistical analyses in randomised trials: comparison of protocols to publications
• PRECIS-2: Precisely how can this tool help investigators design trials to achieve practical answers to 'real-world' questions?
• Precision searching: an innovative search strategy for retrieving the newest and optimal systematic reviews from PubMed
• Preclinical requirements in 114 EMA and 120 FDA therapeutic area guidelines: Helpful for trialists, evaluators, and meta-research?
• Predatory publications in evidence syntheses
• Predatory Publishing in Evidence Synthesis is everyone’s problem
• Predicting the need to update a systematic review
• Predicting, tracking and evaluating results across the project cycle: GIF’s approach to results measurement
• Prediction intervals should be routinely reported in meta-analyses
• Prediction study risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST)
• Prediction study risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST)
• Predictors of change in updated quality of evidence ratings in Cochrane Reviews
• Predictors of evidence-based knowledge in Italian doctors
• Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement
• Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews: Development and Dissemination of the PRIOR Statement
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis protocols and reports – Extension for Children: PRISMA-PC and PRISMA-C 2019
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis protocols and reports – Extension for Children: PRISMA-PC and PRISMA-C 2020
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2019 statement: checklist workshop
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2019 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for living systematic reviews (LSRs)
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): workshop for review authors
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for protocols (PRISMA-P) 2013
• Preliminary assessment of handsearching program­mes for randomized controlled trials in Nigeria
• Preliminary Report on Hand Searching Results of 15 Chinese Dental Journals from the Earliest First Volume of 1953 to the Volumes of 2000
• Preliminary study of citation rates of reviews of interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
• Premature discontinuation of studies approved by research ethics committees: a comparison of randomized and non-randomized clinical studies
• Prematurely discontinued randomized trials are frequently labelled 'completed' in trial registries: a systematic review
• Prepare for success! How to lead a review team and complete your review (or update) on time.
• Preparing 'Summary of findings' tables and grading confidence in estimates of test accuracy in DTA reviews
• Preparing 'Summary of findings' tables and grading confidence in estimates of test accuracy in DTA reviews
• Preparing an overview of reviews: lessons learned
• Preparing and writing a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for publication: common errors and copy-editing
• Preparing Cochrane Reviews for submission, editing and publication: common errors and how to solve them
• Preparing for submitting your manuscript to the Cochrane’s Central Editorial Service for Peer Review – observations from the Central Editorial Service Quality Assurance Team
• Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes measures in meta-analyses: A systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
• Presentation of continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: a survey of clinicians’ understanding and preferences
• Presentation of time-to-event outcomes in GRADE Summary of Finding (SOF) tables: Evaluation of Cochrane Cancer Reviews
• Presenting clinically relevant information on diagnostic performance in systematic reviews: the use of predictive values (PPV and 1-NPV)
• Presenting evidence and practice: A visual interactive map of review-level evidence and digital interventions for drug/alcohol misuse available in England
• Presenting evidence of effectiveness of interventions and more: the evidence of effects page
• Presenting evidence to professionals and the general population - a qualitative inquiry on recipients’ perception of systematic review summary formats
• Presenting evidence-based recommendations to patients and the public—what do people want and how should we provide it?
• Presenting meta-analysis as a typical 2 X 2 table
• Presenting summary information from Cochrane systematic reviews: randomised-controlled trial of infographics vs. standard text-based summaries
• Presenting the results of a Cochrane review to policy makers in a video format
• Presenting the results of a systematic review to non-experts: the Dissemination Checklist
• Presidential hotline: A potential tool for evidence-based decision making in the health sector in South Africa
• Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal
• Prevalence and determinants of hypertension in people living with HIV/AIDS in Fako Division, southwest region of Cameroon
• Prevalence and factors related to positive results of acupuncture randomized trials published in English
• Prevalence and types of 'Risk of bias' assessments across systematic reviews in sports and exercise medicine
• Prevalence of comorbidities in the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms among Postgraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
• Prevalence of gift and ghost authors in Cochrane Reviews
• Prevalence of insurance medicine related outcomes in update reviews of Cochrane’s 2015 priority list
• Prevalence of personal conflict of interest disclosure in cancer systematic reviews published in high-impact journals or the Cochrane library: A systematic review
• Preventing infection from reusable medical equipment
• Preventing infections in cancer patients: what influences the guidelines?
• Preventing over-diagnosis and over-treatment
• Preventing overdiagnosis—can Cochrane and systematic reviews help?
• Preventing overdiagnosis: the Cochrane Brazil Rio de Janeiro experience
• Prevention and control of surgical site infection: preliminary results of a best practice implementation project
• Prevention and treatment of the common cold - The Ari group's contribution to overviews
• Prevention of ankle ligament injuries
• Prevention of asthma admissions with steroids
• Prevention of asthma relapse with steroids
• Prevention of fungal morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients
• Prevention of heel pressure ulcer among adult patients in orthopaedic wards: An evidence-based implementation project
• Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications among patients undergoing general surgery in an acute-care hospital: A best-practice implementation project
• Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with bisphosphonates - a meta-analysis
• Primary outcomes reported in abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov -do they agree?
• PRIME-IPD: A systematic method to prepare Individual participant data for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• Primer in systematic reviews and research synthesis: helping people to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews in Africa
• Primer in systematic reviews: enhancing capacity to find, appraise, interpret and use systematic reviews
• Priorities, publication and progress in reviewing treatment for peripheral nerve disorders
• Prioritisation for Evidence Aid: choosing systematic reviews for the Evidence Aid database
• Prioritisation of Cochrane reviews for consumers and the public to promote evidence-based health care
• Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences
• Prioritisation of varicose vein treatments - incorporating patient preferences
• Prioritisation: how can we meet the Strategy to 2020 target and what does it mean for individual Cochrane Review Groups?
• Prioritising and promoting topics for systematic reviews to address the public health needs of indigenous people
• Prioritising Cochrane reviews on the prevention and treatment of obesity: a mapping and stakeholder consultation project
• Prioritising investment in public health: Translating cost-benefit analysis evidence for policy makers
• Prioritising systematic review topics in public health: A Delphi study with a broad range of stakeholders.
• Prioritising systematic reviews for updating: unlocking the criteria behind Cochrane reviews declared as conclusive
• Prioritising the updating of systematic reviews
• Prioritising topics for new Cochrane systematic reviews in oral health
• Prioritising topics, formulating questions, and selecting outcomes for a World Health Organization nutrition guideline
• Prioritising whether and when to update Cochrane reviews
• Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review
• Prioritization methods in the development and adaptation of health practice guidelines: a systematic survey of published guidance
• Prioritization of primary research based on a mixed-methods systematic review
• Prioritizing clinical research together with patients’ associations: early steps from the PartecipaSalute project
• Prioritizing questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research
• Prioritizing topics for and adopting/adapting WHO guidance: A critical interpretive synthesis
• Priority areas for systematic reviews in chronic otitis media – findings of a systematic-scoping process
• Priority setting distinguishing methodological quality from report quality: assessment example of systematic reviews about non-pharmacological intervention for depression with PRISMA and AMSTAR