• Investigating how implementation strategies promote successful adoption of nutrition interventions for adults with cardiovascular disease using mixed methods evidence synthesis
• Investigating how the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework is used in clinical guidelines: a scoping review
• Investigating Impact of Dietary Patterns: Can Consistent Findings Between Controlled Trials and Observational Evidence Improve Confidence?
• Investigating outcome reporting bias in Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorder (CFGD) reviews
• Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis
• Investigating risk of bias: special considerations for test-treatment interventions
• Investigating the incidence of delirium and its associated symptoms in a medical intensive care unit in Southern Taiwan
• Investigating the modelling of large routine datasets in primary care
• Investigating the role of knowledge users in the production of evidence syntheses
• Investigating the use of the McMaster Premium Literat Ure Service (PLUS) as a method to efficiently update systematic reviews
• Investigating wish bias and mediating role of drug dose in Cochrane systematic reviews: the case-example of fluoxetine
• Investigation for randomisation procedure of Chinese original studies
• Investigation of authenticity of 'claimed' randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quality assessment of RCT reports published in China
• Investigation of publication bias in interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a meta-research study
  
• Investigation of selective reporting of outcomes and results associated with interrupted time series studies
• Investigation of The Extent of Adverse Events Reports Among Systematic Review: A Case Study of Medical Cannabis
• Investigation of the replicability of systematic reviews of the effects of interventions: the REPRISE study
• Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: Follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee
• Investing in women's, children's, and adolescents' health: evidence from economic evaluations
• Invitations to mammography screening: basis for an informed consent?
• Involvement of children and young people in development of an evidence synthesis framework for what interventions best prevent childhood obesity
• Involvement of government policy makers in prioritising national policy needs for systematic review: An Ethiopian experience
• Involvement of patients in the development of Cochrane protocols and reviews, a COPD survey, a patient blog, and a patient information leaflet
• Involvement of patients in the development of Cochrane protocols, a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease survey and a patient blog
• Involvement of people with learning disabilities in guidance development – lost in translation?
• Involving ‘interest holders’ in evidence synthesis – the MuSE Guidance
  
• Involving a parent advisory group in knowledge synthesis and knowledge mobilization of child health evidence: results of a multiyear evaluation
• Involving children and young people in the creation of dissemination materials for a complex evidence synthesis of interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people with long term physical conditions
• Involving clinical stakeholders in the systematic review process: exercises for low back pain
• Involving consumers in evidence based medicine
• Involving health workers by placing them in the centre: how Human-Centred Design can positively impact research and evidence synthesis
• Involving healthcare professionals towards targeted scope of a clinical guidance on generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) in Singapore
  
• Involving older adults and relevant stakeholders in the design and evaluation of the SITLESS complex intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour
• Involving patients in the development of clinical practice guidelines in Kazakhstan
• Involving people in determining outcomes for a proposed Health Technology Assessment surrounding pelvic organ prolapse
• Involving people in society and healthcare
• Involving people with learning disabilities in guideline development – a systematic review
• Involving perceptions of children with asthma in the controlled-exercise intervention – the PLAY framework
• Involving Public Health Professionals In Reviewing The Evidence And Developing Recommendations For Public Health Policy, Practice And Research.
• Involving service users and clinicians to identify research uncertainties of preterm birth: the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
• Involving volunteers in translating Cochrane Plain Language Summaries to increase capacity
• Involving young people in all stages of a systematic review
• Involving young people in systematic reviews of qualita­tive and observational studies
• Iodised Salt for Preventing Iodine Deficiency Disorders
• IPD meta-analyses are important to improve evidence-based decisions in the geriatric population
• IPD meta-analysis of time-to-event data: One-stage versus two-stage approaches to estimating the hazard ratio
• Iranian biomedical researchers and their contribution to developing systematic reviews
• IRIS 2.0 – the priority setting framework of The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
• IRIS—a tool for prioritising guidance development at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
• Is a new approach for evaluating risk of bias in umbrella reviews needed?
  
• Is a new approach for rating the quality evidence of effect estimates derived from matched-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) needed?
• Is a search in trials registers sufficient to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials of a new drug?
• Is adequate reporting on health equity in systematic review equivalent to an equitable recommendation? A case report
• Is Amitriptyline the Reference Antidepressant?
• Is another validation of a clinical prediction rule necessary? A demonstration of research wastes using recursive cumulative meta-analyses
• Is Chilean clinical research on depression aligned with core outcome sets?
  
• Is clinically significant decisional conflict prevalent in primary care? A scoping review
• Is Cochrane review effective for the selection of essential medicine list of China: a case of antihypertensive medicines?
• Is Cochrane Wikipedia compatible?
• Is conducting a rapid review a method to filter the information overload?
• Is consumer information about arthroscopy available in Australia adequate for optimal evidence-infomed decision-making?
• Is effectiveness of complex interventions in primary care in cluster-randomized trials linked to methodological rigor? A systematic review
• Is Evidence produced matters for Malaria prevention? Malaria among pregnant mothers: umbrella review
• Is evidence-based medicine a mirage in resource-constraint settings? A survey among resident doctors in selected teaching hospitals in Nigeria
• Is evidence-based medicine incorporated into the analysis of European health systems?
• Is further research really needed? Evidence from published comparative effectiveness reviews
• Is Google Translate useful for the selection of studies to be included in Cochrane reviews?
• Is health equity considered in systematic reviews of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group?
• Is health information from TV medical talk shows supported by evidence?
• Is it dangerous to publish reviews in paper journals?
• Is it necessary to perform full text papers selection by two independent reviewers in systematic reviews on diagnostic accuracy?
• Is it necessary to search a wide range of databases to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies?
• Is it necessary to search multiple databases for a focussed clinical question?
• Is it necessary to search trials registers?
• Is it necessary to treat acute otitis media for 10 Days? A meta-analysis
• Is it possible to develop guidance for HIV care in resource-poor settings with evidence from resource-poor settings?
• Is it possible to focus EMTREE without loss of sensitivity when searching Embase for systematic reviews? Evidence from practice
• Is it possible to match research outcome measures with patients' expectations?
• Is it Possible to Perform a Meta-Analysis When Only the Median Survival Time is Known? A Comparison with Individual Patient Data Results
• Is it reasonable to pool different estimates of intervention effect calculated from different methods?
• Is it reasonable to pool estimates of intervention effect estimated from different analytical methods for continuous outcomes? A meta-epidemiological study
• Is it time to trust the robots? The reliability and usability of machine learning tools for screening in systematic reviews
• Is it time to trust the robots? The reliability and usability of machine learning tools for screening in systematic reviews
• Is Kudos a valuable resource for Cochrane authors?
• Is methodological guidance concrete enough for HTA? Areas needing further clarifications identified in key documents, including the Cochrane Handbook.
• Is multivariate meta-analysis a solution for reducing the impact of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews?
• Is primary practice evidence based? Comparison of evidence based therapeutic interventions between community based and university based primary care clinics
• Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?
• Is Quality Appraisal Enough? Confidence in Heterogeneous Interventions’ Effectiveness
• Is replication research informing the results of systematic reviews in knowledge translation research?
• Is splint therapy effective in patients with temporomandibular disorders? a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Is sustainability being addressed in implementation science?
• Is the approval status considered in Cochrane reviews of drug therapies?
• Is the available evidence in the field of treatment of opiate addiction enough to inform policy? The experience of developing the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical guidelines
• Is the current way of producing Cochrane reviews the best one? The case of systematic reviews in the pharmacological treatment of spasticity
• Is the definition of 'Cochrane consumer' well understood by the public for non-English speaking countries? Challenges and barriers in China
• Is the dissemination bias still a problem?
• Is the evidence from reviews in the Cochrane Incontinence Group generalisable to older people?
• Is the Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation a reliable approach? for proportion meta-analysis
• Is the highly sensitive search worth the effort?
• Is the information in systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date?
• Is the minimal important difference (MID) considered in systematic reviews?
• Is the minimal important difference (MID) considered in systematic reviews?
• Is the retraction of journal articles in electronic journals and databases consistent and timely? A case study
• Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?
• Is the Standardised Mean Difference a suitable Measure of Treatment Effect?
• Is the transitivity assumption valid?
• Is there a potential of umbrella reviews to inform guideline development?
• Is there a relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and their clinical efficacy? An analysis of studies design and methodology
• Is there agreement in outcomes among Cochrane reviews to support ‘Overviews’ of reviews? a case study within the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group (CEVG)
• Is there any evidence of selective reporting of outcomes in abstracts of Cochrane reviews?
• Is there any similarity between Uncle Scrooge and the pharmaceutical companies in anesthesia clinical outcomes? A systematic survey
• Is timing important in systematic reviews of interventions for breast cancer?
• Is trial registration an indicator of the quality of methodological conduct in fertility trials? A risk of bias assessment
• Is your research answering the questions that patients really see as a priority?
• Issues affecting the public health relevance of Cochrane Reviews
• Issues affecting the validity of a network meta-analysis of acupuncture and other physical therapies for the relief of chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee
• Issues and problems in rehabilitation reviews, and how these may be addressed
• Issues in analyses of behavioural change in a systematic review
• Issues in analyzing, interpreting and presenting patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Issues in developing and disseminating summaries of Cochrane Reviews for specific external audiences
• Issues in improving the quality and increasing the size of the Cochrane Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Field specialized register
• Issues in preparing systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine therapies
• Issues in Using, Interpreting, and Presenting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Issues in using, interpreting, and presenting patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane Reviews
• Issues with scoping reviews – analysis of submissions to a journal editorial office
• Issuing Good Practice Statements in The Canadian Guidelines for Post COVID-19 Condition
  
• It's all in the matrix
• It's elementary Watson: public engagement activities as a first step to empowering young public involvement in health care research
• It's the noise that makes the poison: why current methods for assessing chemicals for toxicity provides so little evidence?
• Italian Cochrane Centre educational and disseminative activities
• Italian Cochrane Centre training and dissemination activities
• Iterative Use of AGREE-II by In-House Systematic Review and Guideline Teams to Improve Transparency in the Guideline Development Process
  
• Ivermectin and benzimidazoles for treating strongyloides infection
• Japanese Brazilian psychiatric out-patients in Japan and in Brazil: profile of those remaining and those returning
• Joining the club—www.cochranejournalclub.com
• Journal and conference abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies: sufficiently informative?
• Journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
• Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO): how systematic are reviews?
• Journal of Evidence-based Medicine: a new window to introduce best evidence from China
• Journal policies and registration of randomised-controlled trials of non-regulated healthcare interventions: A cross-sectional study
• Judging the impact of missing participant continuous data on risk of bias in systematic reviews of randomized trials
• Judging when improved test accuracy will lead to improved treatment outcomes
• Judiciary branch and scientific evidence: An analysis of judicial decisions on galsufase
• Just because it’s 'new' doesn’t mean it’s 'better' - an interactive method for teaching randomized trial design
• Justifications for labelling Cochrane systematic reviews as stable were diverse and not always clear
• Keeping data up-to-date during the development of clinical practice guidelines example of first-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
• Keeping non-English Cochrane evidence dissemination products up to date
• Keeping the record straight 1: dealing with dubious studies identified before their inclusion in a systematic review
• Keeping the record straight 2: dealing with retractions, corrections and expressions of concern for studies included in systematic reviews
• Keeping up and keeping pace with the Evidence, COVID-19 lessons learned
• Keeping Up with an Evolving Field: New Resources for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
• Keeping up with the evidence: prioritizing systematic reviews on antiangiogenic therapy for age-related macular degeneration
• Ketotifen as medication for long-term control of asthma in children: A search of the international literature
• Key concepts for assessing claims about the effects of treatments
• Key concepts for teaching critical appraisal and critical thinking
• Key domains of context and implementation and their assessment in systematic reviews of complex health interventions
• Key domains of context and implementation and their assessment in systematic reviews of complex health interventions
• Key issues and countermeasures of the evidence quality grading for public health decision-making: a Delphi survey
• Key methods reported in protocols and publications of core outcome sets were inconsistent: a comparative study
• Key problems in the economic reviews. There remained several discrepant opinions on the review techniques, such as applicability of foreign studies, overall quality of economic studies, and addressing study heterogeneity.
• KNOW ESSENTIALS: A tool to translate global evidence to local decisions in diverse healthcare settings.
  
• Knowing what works: The Cochrane blog “Wissen Was Wirkt” provides easy and understandable access to Cochrane Evidence in German
• Knowledge and attitudes of professors, residents and medical students toward evidence-based medicine
• Knowledge and awareness of and perception towards cardiovascular disease risk in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review
• Knowledge and Utilisation of the Cochrane Collaboration by Primary Health Care Workers in Argentina
• Knowledge broker training: building capacity to use evidence
• Knowledge brokering: An organisational strategy to support evidence-informed public health
• Knowledge brokering: an organizational strategy to support evidence-informed public health
• Knowledge gaps and priorities for clinical trials in tropical diseases: gleanings from the Cochrane Library
• Knowledge in systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) in postgraduate students of a medical school in Colombia
• Knowledge mapping for research prioritization: examples from the Network for Justice Health
• Knowledge mobilisation of rapid reviews to inform health and care policy and practice: lessons from the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre
• Knowledge Mobilization Among Community Leaders in Equity-Deserving Groups: Application to COVID-19 and Canadian Post-COVID-19 Recommendations (CAN-PCC)
  
• Knowledge mobilization of covid-19 evidence-based health recommendations for parents: a multi-methods randomised trial
• Knowledge of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) terminologies and use of EBM resources at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
• Knowledge synthesis projects and knowledge translation considerations: patterns and trends in a specialized research program
• Knowledge transfer at the Public Health Agency of Canada
• Knowledge translation (KT) to close the know-do gap: extending research benefits to healthcare consumers in India
• Knowledge translation among students: the ExME initiative.
• Knowledge translation and dissemination of Cochrane evidence on pregnancy, childbirth, maternity and breastfeeding into Portuguese language via YouTube.
• Knowledge translation and partner engagement through a national workshop with interactive voting technology
• Knowledge translation by consumers: Development of a promotion kit for use by consumers to promote the work of the Cochrane Collaboration and dissemination of Cochrane reviews
• Knowledge translation for pediatric extensions of systematic review checklists: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis - Protocols for Children (PRISMA-PC) and Reporting (PRISMA-C)
• Knowledge translation for public health supporting evidence-informed decision-making in local government
• Knowledge translation in patient safety: What barriers are present to assess the evidence in practitioners?
• Knowledge translation in the Global South: bridging different ways of knowing for equitable development
• Knowledge translation in times of crises: an evaluation of an academic-government partnership to advance South African COVID-19 clinical practice guidelines
  
• Knowledge translation needs access to knowledge: DIME – Database of Insurance Medicine Evidence - needs assessment, design, development, user testing, implementation, dissemination
• Knowledge translation of traditional chinese medicine of Cochrane Systematic Reviews through WeChat public platform
• Knowledge translation strategies and tools for impactful systematic reviews
• Knowledge Translation Strategy for the Opioid Therapy and Chronic Non-cancer Pain Guideline: A Scoping Review and Delphi Process
• Knowledge translation strategy to support Medicinal Cannabis policy in Colombia: Example of the impact of evidence on Public Health Policy
  
• Knowledge translation to patients: the project of patient-oriented Cochrane Rehabilitation Cochrane Corners
• Knowledge translation: exploring the impact of best practice information sheets (BPIS)
  
• Knowledge translation: packaging, push and support to implementation
• Knowledge translation: the number, coverage, and application of Cochrane Reviews in China
• Knowledge-based interventions for preventing juvenile delinquency within social care - A scoping review of Nordic guidelines
• Knowledge, attitude and practices of evidence-based medicine among doctors in selected hospitals in Sri Lanka
• Knowledge, attitudes and practices of infant feeding among HIV-positive mothers in the filter clinics of Queen Mamohato Memorial Hospital, Maseru, Lesotho