• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in China
• The number, coverage and quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies in Nephrology
• The numerous typologies and taxonomies of evidence synthesis
• The objectively-derived approach enables the development of high-quality search strategies for bibliographic databases
• The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative: Optimising the value of observational data
• The One World Alliance: ensuring relevance to countries with developing economies
• The opinions of guideline developers towards automation in health research: a thematic analysis using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation
• The Optimize4MNH guideline process: state-of-the-art methods for building an evidence-based guideline for health systems
• The ORBIT Study: outcome reporting bias in trials – interviews with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes
• The ORBIT study: outcome reporting bias in trials – inter­views with trialists who do and do not report all outcomes AU:Rebecca Smyth
• The organization of health technology assessment in a European perspective
• The Ottawa Decision Support Framework as a tool to bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine: preliminary results of an implementation study
• The Ottawa panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (EBCPGs) for rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA)
• The outcomes studied by palliative care systematic reviews
• The output of a Masters of Science course in systematic Cochrane reviews
• The PAHO report on the Venezuelan primary health care intervention Barrio Adentro
• The People’s Review: a protocol for a systematic review powered by the public.
• The performance of methodological filters for diagnostic studies in nephrology journals
• The perspective of patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The perspective of people living with chronic heart failure on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The perspective of people living with obesity on self-management interventions: a mixed-method overview for the COMPAR-EU project
• The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure: derivation and application
• The placebo effect dependent on time? - A meta-analysis
• The placebo response in neuropathic pain trials: It is not what you think
• The plain language summary: Cochrane's most valuable product?
• The Policy Liaison Initiative: increasing usability of The Cochrane Library for policy makers
• The Polyglot Search Translator (PST): evaluation of a tool for improving searching in systematic reviews: a randomised cross-over trial
• The Possible Cochrane Neurological Network Newletter: an Information Channel to Diffuse the Cochrane Collaboration in the Neurological Field.
• The potential of text mining to reduce screening workload in systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation
• The power of placebos
• The power of storyboarding as an analytical tool in QES: From review to fieldwork to dissemination
• The power of tailored messaging: Results from Canada's first randomized controlled trial of knowledge brokering
• The predictive validity of GRADE for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study
• The present and future use of text mining for study identification
• The present situation of systematic review training courses in China
• The present status of evidence based medicine (E.B.M.): how relevant is it for developing countries?
• The prevalence of outcome reporting bias in trials (the ORBITstudy)
• The primary health care (PHC) experience with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in Saudi Arabia (SA)
• The prioritization of cost-effectiveness evidence for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Chile
• The PRISMA evaluate the reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses’ abstracts of cost-effectiveness of pregnancy mortality
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta analyses of nursing interventions published in China
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews of China health policy
• The PRISMA-IPD Statement: preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
• The problems of a systematic reviewer in a developing country.
• The problems with systematic reviews: working towards the solutions
• The processing of Cochrane Open Access
• The production, preservation and dissemination of rescue evidence in the Wenchuan earthquake
• The progress of evidence-based healthcare in the National Health Service in England and Wales
• The PROGRESS-Plus framework for assessing the equity of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China
• The promise of hybrid designs for the evaluation of implementation efforts
• The propagation of best evidence: 23 years of Cochrane Brazil workshops
• The proportion of articles behind paywalls – a barrier to patient access?
• The proposed Cochrane agenda setting and priority setting methods group: establishing a research program
• The pros and cons of including abstracts in systematic reviews: findings from the Multiple Data Sources Study (MUDS)
• The protective measures for health-care workers during the outbreak of COVID-19: A rapid review
• The provision of services in the UK for armed forces veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: a rapid evidence synthesis
• The Psychometric Assessment Project: an evaluation of psychometric measures used within Norwegian mental health services
• The Ptolemy Project: knowledge translation and equity in East Africa
• The public sector and the Cochrane Collaboration: potential and problems In the partnerships, and traps for young players
• The public, the internet, and the media are the bridge between producers and users
• The publishing characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews for social welfare
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for health policy research
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for nursing research
• The publishing characteristics of Cochrane Reviews of dentistry and oral health by Chinese researchers
• The quality of Cochrane synopses - a quality assessment pilot project
• The quality of economic studies in respiratory diseases in China by QHES tool
• The quality of evidence is a key determinant of strength of recommendations
• The quality of randomized clinical trials in surgery can be improved. A systematic review
• The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials abstracts is sub-optimal: a survey of four major general medical journals
• The quality of reporting of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on peripartum antiretroviral therapies for preventing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
• The quality of systematic reviews of treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder
• The quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in the field of bariatrics: a cross-sectional systematic survey
• The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials
• The quality of trials in quality improvement: Systematic review of risk of bias in diabetes studies
• The quality survey of campbell systematic reviews using AMSTAR
• The quantity and quality of evidence of pandemic
• The quest for trials on the efficacy of human vaccines: results of the handsearch of the Vaccine journal
• The QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews
• The Rapid Response Service: Synthesized research evidence to inform HIV-related programs, services, and policies in Ontario
• The rate of publication of randomized controlled trials is near-exponential (2.5 times increase/decade with >1.5 million computer listed trials). A new strategy is required to fufil the Cochrane Challenge
• The reality of unclear reported RCTs during selection period of systematic review: a telephone interview survey
• The reference standard for diagnostic imaging test accuracy
• The regulatory process for drug approval needs independent meta-analytical evidence: is Cochrane a possible candidate? The case of psychotropic medicines
• The rehabilitation definition for scientific research purposes by Cochrane Rehabilitation – first results
• The relation between heterogeneity in diagnostic accu­racy, prevalence and patient characteristics: an illustration with individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA)
• The relationship between risk of bias and effect size: randomized controlled trials
• The relationship between the external and internal validity of randomized controlled trials: a sample of hypertension trials from China
• The relationship between the type of rapid reviews and quality: in the background of COVID-19
• The relevance of Cochrane reviews to cancer priorities in Iran
• The relevance of core outcome sets to systematic reviewers and guideline developers
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning
• The reliability and relative advantages of semi-automated approaches to title and abstract screening: making the case for machine learning
• The reliability and validity of estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized clinical trials
• The reliability, usability, and applicability of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS
• The reliability, usability, and utility of tools to appraise quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews: a prospective evaluation of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS
• The reporting and impact of surgeons’ expertise in randomized controlled trials of total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
• The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analysis related to Interventions Published in the Leading Surgery Journals: Overview and Evidence Mapping
• The reporting characteristic of qualitative study: a review
• The reporting characteristics of Campbell Systematic Reviews Using PRISMA - An update of 2013-2016
• The reporting characteristics of WHO guidelines
• The reporting guideline for an acupuncture systematic review
• The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study
• The reporting of guideline dissemination and implementation in WHO guidelines
• The reporting of items generation and consensus in reporting guidelines: a cross sectional study
• The reporting of meta-epidemiological studies: A cross-sectional study
• The reporting of research design of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in abstracts of Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews
• The reporting on adverse events of drug intervention versus non-drug intervention in meta-analyses: can we do better presentation?
• The reporting quality of acupuncture-related infections in Korean literature: a systematic review of case studies
• The reporting quality of clinical guidelines in China based on Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT)
• The reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies in the urology literature
• The reporting quality of interventional animal experiments in Chinese journals based on the evaluated results of the Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines
• The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy published in high impact factor journals, based on the PRISMA-DTA statement
• The research about guidance of systematic review for clinical study
• The research progress of open-label placebo (OLP) and implications for future studies: a systematic survey
• The Research Status of eHealth Literacy
• The Research Status of the eHealth Literacy Scales
• The return of the register: the UKCCCR Register of Cancer Trials
• The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials
• The rising importance of Cochrane systematic reviews in a Latin-American evidence-based journal
• The risk of bias in Iranian randomized controlled trials included in Cochrane Reviews
• The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomised clinical trial publications
• The risk-of-bias and standards of reporting of published randomized controlled trials of medical education (Med Ed) research
• The risk-of-bias profile of neonatal randomised-controlled trials in Cochrane reviews: are we better over the years?
• The ROB-ME (Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence) tool: a new tool for assessing reporting biases in evidence syntheses
• The RobotSearch RCT classifier: ready for use?
• The robustness of results on weight loss in trials on sibutramine – a comparison of results from unpublished study reports with the corresponding published reports
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC): review author experiences
• The role of a Cochrane Review Group Trials Search Co-ordinator: working practices
• The role of a new Cochrane systematic review examining community-wide interventions to increase physical activity
• The role of collaborative evidence networks in promoting and supporting evidence-based health care (EBHC) globally
• The role of evidence in population based health outcome assessments by health authorities
• The Role of feeding programs in achieving Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) One and Two: The School and Preschool feeding exemplar
• The role of health consumers in learning health systems: scoping the literature
• The role of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in systematic literature searches of Cochrane Reviews
• The role of meta-analysis in assessing the scientific basis of lasers in medicine
• The role of meta-regression in Cochrane reviews
• The role of patient involvement in the evidence-based research process: using systematic reviews to inform future research
• The role of patients reporting evidence. Pacientesonline: the site for patients, done by patients
• The role of prospective trials registration and trials registers in improving the design, conduct and reporting of randomized clinical trials from developing countries
• The role of reviewer reflexivity: reflections from a mixed-method consultative systematic review
• The role of specialist registers of trials in the age of the 'Mega-Register'
• The role of student scholarships in Cochrane reviews
• The role of systematic reviews in meta-analyses: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics for the treatment of depression
• The role of the medical information database in managing the East Japan disaster
• The Role of the NHS economic evaluation database (NHS EED) within the systematic review process
• The Russian translation project and dissemination of Cochrane evidence: achievements and barriers as feedback from volunteer translators
• The safety and effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review
• The scientific basis of cancer care: the discrepancy between research priorities and research efforts
• The scope and impact of Cochrane Reviews related to cancer
• The scope of empirical research in bioethics
• The search for guidelines: A comprehensive approach.
• The selection of fixed- or random-effect models in recent published meta-analyses
• The sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index (SCI)
• The Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (SGAT-SR): user experience with 113 Cochrane Reviews
• The size of the gap between research evidence and clinical practise: questionnaire survey on treatment of patients with liver disease
• The snowball effect: promoting Cochrane evidence via social media
• The South Asian Cochrane Network: supporting reviewers in South Asia and contributing to the global Cochrane agenda
• The SPARK tool to prioritize questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research
• The SPIRIT initiative: defining standard protocol items for randomised trials
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada
• The state of the art of practice guidelines development, dissemination, and evalution in Canada
• The Stats Café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified)
• The stats café (today’s special: statistics for the terrified)
• The straight leg raising test: meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy in radiculopathy
• The strategies and measures of promoting improvement of the quality of clinical trials in China
• The strength of recommendation is weak for use of ShenXiong glucose injection in patients with AIS
• The Stroke Therapy Evaluation Progrannne(STEP): An Attempt To Introduce A Culture Of Evidence-Based Practice Into Stroke Rehabilitation.
• The structure of research questions in rehabilitation randomized-controlled clinical trials: a methodological study
• The study of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews of acupuncture
• The study of reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis on acupuncture
• The Study-Level Index of Confounding: a meta-analytic tool to enhance the utility of observational data for comparative effectiveness
• The Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for global policy making
• The Symptomatic Treatment of The Cough in Whooping Cough
• The synthesis of economic evidence to improve global policy and equity in healthcare decision-making, using systematic reviews with hierarchical decision matrices
• The Systematic Review Data Repository 2.0 (SRDR 2.0) – Summary data for end-users
• The Systematic Review Toolbox: an updated resource to support evidence synthesis
• The systematic reviews and meta-analyses on nutrition: a bibliometric analyses
• The Systematic Reviews Training Unit: capacity building for the future
• The systematic use of evidence-based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision making in an international guideline project
• The Theory of Everything in Health Decision-Making: Step 2
• The theory of planned behaviour applied to shared decision making behaviours: a systematic review
• The therapeutic drug management program: a collaborative initiative of teaching hospitals
• The time-series studies for health policy research in China
• The timing of outcome measurement is not usually defined in systematic review protocols registered in PROSPERO
• The top cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a bibliometric analysis
• The top clinical research priorities in mental health: implementation and maintainance of a website with free access for researchers, academics, health professionals and consumers in Brazil
• The TRANSFER framework to assess transferability of systematic review findings
• The treatment of Spasmodic Dysphonia with Botulinum Toxin injection
• The trend of life expectancy for people with disabilities in Taiwan
• The triple C (consultation, collaboration and consolidation) model - a way forward to sustainability of evidence into practice
• The TRIPOD extension for reporting of prediction model studies using patient-level data from electronic healthcare records and meta-analysis
• The type and evaluation of evidence in clinical pathways
• The UK NHS HTA programme
• The UK NHS HTA programme
• The UK top 10 clinical research priorities in neuro-oncology
• The unique challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of cluster-randomized trials
• The updated JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines in China
• The updating of clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review of the research evidence
• The UpPriority Tool: a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline’s questions