• Strategies and measures to improve the quality of clinical trials in China
• Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and population: scoping review
• Strategies for developing evidence-based guideline for colorectal cancer screening in China
• Strategies for eliciting mutual benefit from translating Cochrane Review content: the example of Cochrane Kompakt in German
• Strategies for enhancing awareness and implementation of palliative care guidelines: summary cards and online platforms for patient and healthcare providers
  
• Strategies for handling dose effects in network meta-analysis: a review of practice and methodology
• Strategies for improving health systems in low-income countries: lessons learnt from four overviews of systematic reviews of health systems interventions
• Strategies for maximizing IPD retrieval in IPDMA: A mixed method study
• Strategies for Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Diseases
• Strategies for successful community engagement in infectious disease clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries: Review findings visualised as storyboard
  
• Strategies for the investigation of hyperandrogenism and the principles of evidence based medicine
• Strategies for translating global evidence to local impact: bridging the gap
  
• Strategies for updating clinical practice guidelines: feasibility and efficiency
• Strategies in priority setting for practice guideline development
• Strategies that promote the use of The Cochrane Library
• Strategies to Address Anti-Black Racism in Nursing Methodological Considerations
  
• Strategies to build a consumer network for the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG)
• Strategies to enhance the utilization of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses of health interventions using GRADE
• Strategies to fill knowledge gaps in health care—experiences from the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU)
• Strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised-controlled trials: A systematic review of non-randomised evaluations
• Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials
• Strategies to reduce attrition in randomised trials: a methodology review
• Strategy for teaching and disseminating Cochrane methodology for students and teachers of a private university in Brazil
• Strategy sharing for increasing translation capacity and disseminating translated Cochrane evidence
• Stratification by quality-induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials
• Streamlined versus extensive search methods - is there a difference?
• Streamlining communication of Cochrane content between three German language Cochrane entities under an international umbrella
• Streamlining living evidence surveillance: a case-study of Stroke Guidelines
• Streamlining meta-analysis processes through the integrated use of a computational ontology and statistical language
• Streamlining systematic reviews to provide healthcare decision-makers with more timely evidence: the DERP experience
• Streamlining systematic reviews: Using machine learning to enhance screening efficiency
  
• Streamlining the review process by using structured templates for review protocols: experience with JBI SUMARI
• Streamlining your review using Covidence
• Strength of the evidence and treatment recommendations: a survey of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
• Strengthening capacity for producing systematic reviews in low and middle income countries
• Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in policy making: Experience from Kenya and Malawi
• Strengthening clinical governance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic (scoping) review
• Strengthening collaboration between policy makers and evidence providers, and facilitating cooperation
• Strengthening health systems by integrating clinical audits and feedback into primary health care practice to assist evidence informed decision making
• Strengthening the global evidence base on public health and social measures through a WHO research initiative
• Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)
• Strengthening transparency in randomized trials related to multimorbidity: key points to guide reporting
  
• Striving for relevance: helping ensure that Cochrane systematic reviews meet the information needs of researchers, clinical practitioners and patients in cancer
• Structural analysis of health technology assessements (HTA) demonstrates the need for standardized assessment of transparency, applicability and consistency (TAC criteria)
• Structural recommendations assessment of eight clinical practice guidelines developed in Colombia
• Structured clinical trial summaries
• Structured summaries in French to facilitate access to findings of Cochrane Systematic reviews to primary care physicians: a Swiss initiative
• Structured, nurse-led ward rounds to improve interprofessional communication and optimize care of vascular surgery patients: A best practice implementation project
• Students 4 Best Evidence: a network for students interested in evidence-based healthcare - where are we now, nearly 4 years on?
• Students 4 Best Evidence: A network for students interested in evidence-based healthcare – an interactive priority-setting workshop
• Students 4 Best Evidence: engaging students globally in evidence-based practice
• Studies predicting adverse outcomes from febrile neutropenic episodes in children and young people with malignant disease suffer similar methodological flaws as prognostic and diagnostic test accuracy studies
• Studification in the Cochrane Register of Studies
• Study centric data management and analysis: How does Revman Web compares with Revman
• Study design features affect estimates of sensitivity and specificity, but effects may vary
• Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: a methodological review and classification.
• Study of therapeutic variation in the ischemic stroke
• Study on an 'indirect' risk prediction method of herb-induced hepatotoxicity based on artificial intelligence plus evidence-based evaluation
• Study selection by means of a web-based Trial Selection DataBase (webTSDB)
• Study settings of Cochrane HIV/AIDS systematic reviews
• Study-based registers
• Study-based Registers
• Subclinical hyperthyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism and risk of mortality from all causes: evidence from a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
• Subgroup analyses in individual patient data meta-analyses are driven by inconsistent use of subgroup analytic methods
• Subgroup analyses in individual patient data meta­analysis: are they confounded?
• Subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
• Subgroup analysis in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: the same pitfalls as in individual trials
• Substantial discrepancies exist between registered protocol and published manuscript in trials on exercise for low back pain: a meta-research study
• Successful collaboration between guideline groups to reduce redundancy in guideline development
  
• Successful implementation of opioid-use guidelines for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP)
• Successful multi-language free online animated learning resource
• Sufficiently stable systematic reviews using random order cumulative meta-analysis
• Summaries of Cochrane reviews at the physicians' desks
• Summaries of evidence for health policymakers in low and middle income countries (LMIC)
• Summarising and presenting evidence for prescribing and drug use consumer interventions
• Summarising diagnostic accuracy using a single parameter
• Summarising evidence for harms in systematic reviews
• Summarized evidence for the busy clinician: a randomized controlled trial of an online course in evidence-based medicine using systematic reviews
• Summarizing evidence for policy: some limitations of rapid and systematic reviews
• Summary of best evidence for airway management of mechanical ventilation in critically ill obese patients
  
• Summary of best evidence for self-management of patients with receiving oral warfarin therapy
• Summary of clinical evidence for cupping therapy: an overview of systematic reviews
• Summary of evidence for the treatment of pressure ulcer with electrical stimulation
  
• Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in Cochrane reviews
• Summary of recommendations for breastfeeding of infants born to mothers with COVID-19
• Summary of the best evidence for electrical stimulation in patients with peripheral artery disease
• Summary of the best evidence for peripheral arterial catheters placement and management in pediatric intensive care unit
• Summary of the Best Evidence for Prevention of Limb Ischemia in Adult Patients with Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Pulmonary Oxygenation
  
• Summary of the Best Evidence of Respiratory Training of the Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
• Superfilters website: a searching tool for review authors
• Superfilters website: a searching tool for review authors
• Supplementary search methods versus bibliographic database searching to identify studies: early results from our Cochrane Methods Review
  
• Supplementary searches of PubMed to improve currency of MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process searches via Ovid: evidence from practice
• Supplementary tables for systematic reviews of herbal medicine or acupuncture
• Supplementing Systematic Review Evidence with Health System Data: A Target Trial Emulation of Triptan in Migraine Patients with Increased Cardiovascular Risk
• Supplementing Systematic Review Findings with Healthcare System Data: Final Results from the US AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program Pilot Projects
• Supporting advanced contributors to the Cochrane Collaboration in Australasia: bridging the gaps in training and support
• Supporting carers of people with Alzheimer's disease: the qualitative challenge
• Supporting clinical trial registration and reporting requirements at academic organizations in the USA
• Supporting Cochrane editorial teams
• Supporting COVID-19 Decision Making through Rapid Evidence Syntheses and Products
• Supporting diverse review methods: a protocol and review template for Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care's (EPOC) qualitative evidence syntheses
• Supporting early career researchers overcoming challenges and ensuring accessibility in resource-constrained settings
  
• Supporting evidence-based decisions of the Brazilian Regulatory Agency for Supplementary Healthcare: a case study
• Supporting evidence-based judicial decisions in Brazil: a case study
• Supporting evidence-based practice and Cochrane reviews: the SEA-ORCHID fellowships programme
• Supporting evidence-informed decision making through a dynamic public health evidence synthesis team
• Supporting evidence-informed decisions about healthcare systems in low and middle-income countries: the Norwegian EPOC satellite
• Supporting healthcare consumer engagement and involvement: what consumer-related activities are Cochrane Geographic Groups undertaking and how can these be strengthened?
• Supporting meaningful patient and public involvement in systematic reviews
• Supporting physicians in decision making – a Polish experience
• Supporting policy-relevant reviews and trials in low and middle-income countries
• Supporting rapid learning and improvement in a health-system transformation: A qualitative description of implementation supports
• Supporting systematic review authors to report and explore the applicability and transferability of their findings
• Supporting the use of systematic reviews in policy making through review-derived products
• Supporting trainers in evidence synthesis: Building a stronger community
• Surfing, drowning or wiped out by big data: Which way for evidence synthesis?
• Surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea
• Surgical trials and trial registries: a cross-sectional study of RCTs published in journals requiring trial registration in their author instructions
• Surveillance system assessing the need for updating systematic reviews
• Surveillance system assessing the need for updating systematic reviews
• Survey among Cochrane authors about early stages of systematic reviews
• Survey among IVF professionals to assist the development of a decision aid in reproductive medicine
• Survey among Spanish doctors about worldwide initiatives aiming to reduce low-value health practices and their diagnostic recommendations
• Survey of American Media Coverage of the Review of Mammography Trials: An Opportunity to Educate Consumers About the Risks of Detecting Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
• Survey of clinical trials in children in WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
• Survey of contributorship in Cochrane reviews
• Survey of current status and its satisfaction of volunteers in Chinese Cochrane Center
• Survey of diagnostic test meta-analyses
• Survey of investigators in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register: did they publish? If not why not?
• Survey of knowledge of evidence-based medicine among clinicians in China
• Survey of outcomes in Cochrane Reviews: support for ‘core outcome set’ (COS) development
• Survey of plain film radiography protocols taught at chiropractic schools for acute low-back pain
• Survey of refereeing practices of Cochrane Review Groups
• Survey of the needs, guideline development processes, and collaborative efforts of guideline- producing organizations
• Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation
• Survey of the use of Cochrane Style Guide guidance in published Cochrane reviews
• Survey of views on including grey literature in systematic reviews
• Survey on health information needs, access and practice of evidence-informed healthcare among medical practitioners in India
• Surveying the Belgian general population on their skills and attitudes toward evidence-based health care
• Survival analysis used to estimate time to publication of reports of randomised controlled trials
• Survival benefits with diverse systemic treatment regimens for advanced colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of multiple treatments
• Survival curve and hazard ratio program (SCHARP) for meta-anaysis of individual patient data
• Survival meta-analysis of individual patient data and survival meta-analysis of published (aggregate) data: is there any intermediate approach between these two opposite options?
• Suspected publication bias regarding efficacy of psychoeducative interventions on burden experienced by caregivers of people with dementia
• Sustainable Development Goals and health research: are high-priority health problems being addressed with high-quality studies and with equity?
• SWAR 2: How much do you need? Can readers get the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews, without reading the full review?
• SWIFT-Active Screener: reducing literature screening effort through machine learning for systematic reviews
• Swiss family physicians' perception and attitude towards knowledge translation
• Syncope and other adverse events associated with cholinesterase inhibitors: Systematic review of the\hb literature versus analysis of the FDA Adverse Events Database
• Syndrome element diagnostic rating scale of traditional Chinese medicine
• Synergy in Trustworthy Guidelines and Essential Medicine Lists
  
• Synergy of systematic reviews of animal and clinical studies: towards evidence-based translational medicine
• Synergy strategies between scientific evidence and public policies in updating clinical practice guidelines in Brazil
• Synopses of national and international guidelines as the basis for disease-management programmes
• Synopses: proposal for a new format
• Synthesis methods in systematic reviews of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and qualitative evidence: an example from public health
• Synthesis of health system barriers and facilitators to scaling up vaccination communication interventions in Cameroon, Mozambique and Nigeria
• Synthesis of individual data from case reports and case series on survival
• Synthesis of qualitative research findings: What are they, where are they and what should I do with them?
• Synthesis of qualitative research findings: what are they, where are they and what to do with them?
• Synthesis of quality of life data in systematic reviews: problems and proposals
• Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence in systematic reviews: an example from public health
• Synthesis of recommendations for clinical use of biomarkers in oncology
• Synthesis research in support of public health decision making on vector-borne diseases in Canada
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible (Part I): approaches to grouping, presentation and synthesis
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible (Part II): implementing good practice in reviews of complex interventions
• Synthesis when meta-analysis is not possible: approaches to grouping, presentation and synthesis
• Synthesis without meta-analysis when assessing effects of return-to-work interventions – experiences from a systematic review
• Synthesis without meta-analysis: variations in vote counting based on direction of effect lead to different conclusions about exposure/outcome relationships
• Synthesising economic evaluations from different countries: challenges for Cochrane reviewers
• Synthesising evidence in public health systematic reviews of interventions: a Bayesian approach
• Synthesising health impact and health inequalities: an example from a review of school-based cognitive behavioural interventions
• Synthesising risk from summary evidence across multiple risk factors
• Synthesized evidence on conflict and war: a systematic map and critical appraisal of systematic reviews
• Synthesized HIV/AIDS research evidence (SHARE): An online database to capture, link, and share current HIV-related systematic reviews
• Synthesizing and presenting results when meta-analysis is not possible
• Synthesizing evidence about emerging diagnostic technologies for practice and policy mind the gap!
• Synthesizing health systems evidence: The contribution of a network based on North-South collaboration
• Synthesizing results from nonrandomized studies of interventions: maximizing the use of research across policy domains
• Synthesizing UN evaluations to drive progress toward the sustainable development goals: enhancing rigor to ensure credibility and use
• Systematic and comprehensive identification of confounders for three non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) emulating 'target' randomized controlled trials (RCT)
• Systematic appraisal of Chilean clinical guidelines included in the 'Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare' Program using AGREE II
• Systematic approach to guide the Lancet Commission on Syria: The case of healthcare workers in conflict settings
• Systematic Bibliometric Review: A new methodology presenting patient-centred outcomes in the context of reviews, guidelines, and media reports. Part 1: Methodology description
• Systematic Bibliometric Review: A new methodology presenting patient-centred outcomes in the context of reviews, guidelines, and media reports. Part 2: A case study of Rituximab for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) 1997–2003
• Systematic evaluation of the methodology of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulation in patients with cancer
• Systematic evaluation of the quality of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulation in patients with cancer
• Systematic evaluation of web-based, publicly accessible clinical trials results databases
• Systematic evidence for health improvement in health action zones
• Systematic mapping - a new development in the evidence base for social care
• Systematic methods for identifying evidence for broad review questions: looking beyond titles and abstracts
• Systematic reevaluation of meta-analyses of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy trials in depression treatment using prediction intervals
• Systematic review & meta-analysis: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) pertaining to clinical cognition assessment in stroke patients
• Systematic review and cross cultural adaptation of clinical guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of available interventions for the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia in patients with advanced prostate cancer
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies of multivariable diagnostic or prognostic models: a primer
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization singletons
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and single group continuous data: methodological and practical challenges and benefits