• SHARE-IT: rapid production of online decision aids linked to guidelines for point-of-care shared-decision making
• Shared decision making and decision aids in MEDLINE
• Shared decision making does not influence physicians against clinical practice guidelines
• Shared decision making in health care: a literature review
• Shared decision-making for the management of neonatal jaundice in Taiwan: a multi-center questionnaire survey
  
• Shared decision-making interventions for children with chronic conditions: Determining the clarity of the evidence
• Shared support for consumers in Cochrane
• Sharing Cochrane Consumer Synopses with University Staff and Students: Experiences from Nigeria
• Sharing evidence through Twitter
• Sharing evidence with clinicians in ethically sound environment
• Sharing individual-participant data from clinical research: point of view of Italian patient and citizen associations
• Sharing participant-level clinical trial data in public repositories: what are implications for Cochrane reviews?
• Sharing resources to develop a guideline with little direct cost: the Bahrain Evidence-based Guideline INitiative (B.E.G-I-N) experience
• Sharing tacit knowledge to build capacity for knowledge translation: lessons learned from pan-Canadian public health webinars
• Sharing through play: creating a board game for disseminating research to care home staff
• Sharing trial-level data from multiple meta-epidemiological studies - Experiences from establishing the COMFIT Study Group and Database
• Sharp increase in access to the Japanese translations of Cochrane systematic review abstracts after the intro­duction of a non-login system
• Shedding light on the maze of study labels and features: analysis of CBA and ITS studies in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
• Shifting effects in three randomised controlled trials on music therapy in mental health
• Short-term use of statins for prevention of delayed ischemic neurological deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (coil versus clip): meta-analysis
• Short-term use of therapeutic opioids for children and future misuse: a systematic review and qualitative study of decision-maker information needs
• Shortening the pipeline: the use of data mining to link new trials to Cochrane Reviews
• Shortening the pipeline: the use of data mining to link new trials to Cochrane Reviews
• Should a power analysis be included in a systematic review?
• Should aggregate data be included where individual participant data are unavailable? Lessons from a large individual participant data meta-analysis
• Should all inclusion criteria be used for inclusion?
• Should case series be included in systematic reviews when controlled trials are scarce?
• Should Cochrane limit the number of outcomes in a systematic review?
• Should Cochrane reviews that include full text reports of nonrandomised evidence also include abstracts of such evidence?
• Should Cochranites adopt a specific hierarchy of outcomes?
• Should conference abstracts be included in systematic reviews?
• Should data from case-control studies be included in systematic reviews alongside diagnostic cohort studies?
• Should diagnostic search filters be used in systematic reviews?
• Should Economic Appraisal Be Combined Within Systematic Reviews In The Cochrane Library?
• Should first dressing change be 24 hours after CVC insertion in pediatric critically ill patients? A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
  
• Should guideline developers include clinicaltrials.gov in exhaustive literature reviews?
• Should I include non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) in my systematic review, and, if so, which types? An author-focused workshop
  
• Should industry funding of trials included in all Cochrane drug reviews be declared in the plain language summary?
• Should non-randomised studies be included in reviews of interventions for vulnerable groups: a case study from domestic violence research?
• Should our reviews be more concerned with gender of participants in trials?
• Should Referees of Systematic Reviews Have Access to Original Papers?
• Should sensitivities derived from 2x1 tables be included in diagnostic systematic reviews: a review of systematic reviews
• Should systematic reviews include non-randomized trials? Quality and results of various study types investigating the effect of acupuncture on idiopathic headaches
• Should systematic reviews of diagnostic tests go beyond test accuracy?
• Should the PRISMA statement be fully qualified to report an updated meta-analysis? A case report
• Should there be Cochrane reviews of disease aetiology? A discussion poster
• Should we continue to handsearch MEDLINE-indexed journals prospectively? Some up-to-date empirical evidence
• Should we exclude poorly reported qualitative studies from systematic reviews? An evaluation of three reviews of qualitative data
• Should we Review Single Interventions or All Comparators in a Decision-Making Context?
• Should we treat? Should we not treat? A meta-analysis as a powerful tool in conducting systematic reviews, and our evidence-based observations for the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) in adult patients with Idiopatic Glomerulonephritides (GN).
• Should we trust author correspondence? A case study looking at risk of bias
• Should we update Cochrane reviews every two years? A methodological study
• Shuxuetong injection for ischaemic stroke: An overview of systematic reviews
• Side effects of treatment of COVID-19 with drugs or medical devices: systematic review and case report
• Sifting the evidence: the Achilles heel of the evidence-based medicine (EBM) paradigm
• Sigma N=1 does not equal RCT
• Significance-chasing bias: conceptual framework and an exploratory test
• Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
• Silenced Narratives: Unravelling Sexual function Challenges in Migrant and Refugee
  
• Similarities in the use and presentation of outcome measures: a prerequisite for combining study results.
• Similarity of the benefit risk ratio between children and adults: results of a meta-epidemiological study
• Similarity of the treatment benefit between children and adults: results of a meta-epidemiological study
• Simple 'quick’ searches to answer questions arising in clinical practice
• Simplicity, usability and accessibility: demonstrating successful tools produced by the Evidence Synthesis Hackathon
• Simplifying Cochrane Systematic Reviews with AI for Improved Shared Decision Making
• Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiological study
• Six Sigma applications for patient safety in a university hospital
• Small sample size, composite endpoints, trials stopped early for benefit: threats to valid meta-analysis
• Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis
• Small study effect and publication bias in systematic reviews with meta-analyses
• Smoking and Health Outcomes: An Evidence Mapping from Existing Systematic Reviews
• Smoking cessation in pregnancy: re-analysing equity in a Cochrane Review
• So what the hell is an odds ratio? Can we make the results of reviews more easily understood?
• So, where is the evidence for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia?
• Social inequalities and access to health services in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Havana, Cuba, 2012 to 2015
• Social involvement when incorporating technologies in Brazilian supplementary healthcare
• Social media as a knowledge-translation tool to disseminate public-health evidence
• Social media for dissemination of Cochrane evidence in Polish and creating engagement opportunities
• Social media strategy for disseminating systematic review evidence
• Social network analysis for identifying central outcomes for clinical research: a case study using Cochrane reviews of HIV/AIDS
• Social network analysis of the Cochrane Facebook Group
• Social relevance of evidence-based medicine in the Brazilian drug market
• Social sustainability of healthcare systems: a scoping review
  
• Social values underlying priority setting
• Social work and the Cochrane Collaboration: qualitative interviews with Cochrane contributors of social work background
• Social, behavioural and community-engagement interventions (SBCE) for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: An evidence-gap map (EGM)
• Sociological perspective
• Sociopolitical factors for the institutionalization of evidence-informed policymaking in South America
  
• Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors for patients with chronic kidney disease: a risk-stratified clinical practice guideline.
• Software for calculating the number needed to treat for Cochrane reviews
• Software for computing treatment effects, performing meta-analyses, and creating forest plots
• Software for data transformation for time-to-event outcomes
• Software for handsearching control and management of randomized and clinical controlled trials
• Software for making the best use of published summary statistics in systematic reviews of survival data
• Software solutions to create and manage systematic reviews and meta-analysis
• Software to help manage the characteristics of included studies in Cochrane reviews
• Software tools to support network development in network meta-analysis: a feature analysis
• Solutions to challenges of quality evidence production from traditional medicine research: second thoughts from developers of an evidence-based decision aid
• Sorting the men from the boys? A systematic review of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for malignancy
• Sorting the wheat from the chaff: How does the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Trials Register compare to searching standard electronic databases?
• Sources of heterogeneity in Cochrane Reviews on HIV
• Sources of information and attitudes towards evidence-based healthcare: a survey of Swiss physicians
• Sources of knowledge commonly used by Cochrane authors in developing countries
• Sources of knowledge in clinical practice and knowledge of evidence based medicine in postgraduate medical students and faculty members
• South American participation in the development of core outcome sets
• Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines are methodologically good but with opportunities for improvement: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX
• Spanish translations of Cochrane Plain language summaries: assessing the impact of a controlled language checker on machine translation quality
• Speaking the same language: toward a shared understanding of living evidence
• Specialist care for epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures in adults: methodological issues in the review of multiple socially-complex interventions
• Specialist digital libraries - helping to facilitate the use of Cochrane Reviews
• Specialized Quality Assessment for Special Trials: A Quality Reassessment of Cross-over Trials Involved in Cochrane Systemtic Reviews
• Specific strategies to increase access to Cochrane training opportunities in South Africa and the African region
• Specifics problems encountered in a meta-analysis of homeopathic medicine
• Specify your research needs; the FIT tool for determining the nature of knowledge gaps in guidelines
• Specifying the ‘PICO’ for each synthesis: current practice and development of the InSynQ (Intervention Synthesis Questions) checklist and guide
• Speed things up! How to accelerate the uptake of research results into clinical guidelines and practice
• Spin bias in clinical trials of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogues: a meta-epidemiologic study
• Spin in systematic reviews and health technology assessments about robotic thoracic surgery: a systematic review
• SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials )-Outcomes: enhanced trial outcome transparency, less bias, improved systematic reviews, better health
• SPIRIT-Outcomes and CONSORT-Outcomes: Enhanced trial outcome transparency, less bias, improved systematic reviews, better health
• Split-Mouth and crossover trials in dentistry are neither well differentiated, nor well analyzed or reported
• Sponsorsá influence on reporting of results in industry-sponsored trials: a comparison of protocols and published papers
• Sponsorship of drug and device studies and research outcome
• Sponsorship, bias and methodology: Cochrane reviews compared with paper-based meta-analyses of the same drugs
• Spread of evidence-based practice into directors of nursing by an outreach campaign in Taiwan
• Spreading a culture of patient involvement at an institution level: HAS feedback
• Spreading Cochrane press releases to lay people and Italian journalists
• Spreading good ideas for improving health services: a systematic review of the literature across 11 disciplinary traditions
• Spreading the word about public health research: the Public Health Effectiveness Project
• Staff and consumer perceptions of research in mental health settings
• Staff self-evaluation of skills in evidence-based medicine
• Stakeholder analysis for advancing health-technology assessment in India: A pilot
• Stakeholder engagement in a rapid review to determine the effectiveness of interventions to attract, recruit and retain social care workers
• Stakeholder engagement process in priority setting for trials methodology research and Cochrane Reviews
• Stakeholder involvement for interpretation, translation, and dissemination in qualitative evidence synthesis: learnings and reflections
• Stakeholder involvement for investigating communication-based interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake
• Stakeholder involvement in Cochrane reviews of urological conditions
• Stakeholder involvement in selecting systematic review topics
• Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
• Stakeholder involvement in the preparation of systematic and rapid reviews: a cross-sectional study
• Stakeholder involvement throughout a PhD program: principles, purpose, and process
• Stakeholder involvement to enhance the relevance and accessibility of a Cochrane review of physical rehabilitation after stroke
• Stakeholder mapping to identify stakeholders for the Cochrane Cancer Network
• Stakeholder mapping: identifying and connecting with a diverse range of partners
• Stakeholder-related Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of Obstetric Guidelines: A Scoping Review
• Stakeholder/consumer engagement in systematic reviews
• Stakeholders' perceptions of obstetric violence and humanized birth practices in Chile
• Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of animal assisted interventions for people with dementia: a qualitative evidence synthesis engaging patient and public
• Standard operating procedures for the preparation Of reviews: Experiences with HTA reports in Germany
• Standard search strategies should be conducted for clinical pathways in PubMed
• Standardising outcomes in Cochrane Pregnancy Childbirth Systematic Reviews
• STANDARDIZED COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENTS FOR PATIENTS WITH ORAL CAVITY AND OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER
• Standardized mean differences may be used to derive odds ratios of treatment response: Meta-epidemiological study
• Standardized multilingual collaborative reporting of evidence synthesis
  
• Standards for implementing Plain Language Summaries
• Standards for Reporting of Overviews of Reviews and Umbrella Reviews (STROVI) statement
• Standing out in an evidence-informed world: online training and credentialing for evidence-informed public health
• STAR Recommendation: a new method to develop recommendations rapidly—protocol for development
  
• STARD for registration: establishing guidance on where and how to register diagnostic accuracy studies prospectively
• Start strong: choosing your review topic and writing your topic proposal
• Starting a new review group: tribulations without trials
• Starting and sustaining a Field
• State of current practice for addressing racial and ethnic health equity (RHE) in systematic review and guideline development
• State-of-the-art in ophthalmology randomized controlled trials
• State-society relations in low-and middle-income countries: An evidence-gap map
• Statins for women with polycystic ovary syndrome not actively trying to conceive
• Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study
• Statistical Approaches to Adjusting Weights for Dependent Arms in Network Meta-analysis
• Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study
• Statistical aspects of quality control of handsearching medical literature for identification of clinical trials
• Statistical challenges in investigating prognostic factors for memory training success in healthy older adults: a systematic review
• Statistical heterogeneity and the choice between fixed- and random-effect models: an exploratory analysis of Cochrane reviews
• Statistical literacy in health in a highly motivated patient sample
• Statistical methods for investigating heterogeneity related to methodological quality in meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic accuracy
• Statistical methods for meta-analysis of individual patient data
• Statistical methods for meta-analysis: an overview
• Statistical methods for reliably updating meta-analyses
• Statistical models for network meta-analysis: an empirical comparison
• Statistical simulation to assess results of meta-analyses using post-intervention, change from baseline and mixed methods
• Status of protocols in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
• Stay programme at the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre in Barcelona
• Staying ‘up-to-date’ with bladder cancer research publication rates and scatter
• Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane living systematic review
• STEM: Systematically Testing the Evidence on Marijuana
  
• StemCreDB: stem cell clinical research database platform based on systematic review
• Step-by-step guidance on conducting prospective meta-analyses
• Step-by-step guidance on conducting prospective meta-analyses
• STEPP: Supporting Translation of Evidence into Policy and Practice
• Stepping outside our comfort zone knowledge translation in practice
• Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers
• Stimulating evidence-based healthcare in The Netherlands
• Stimulating research development: the effect of a patient-clinician partnership that identified and prioritized research needs in urinary incontinence
• Stop press! Experience of managing serious complaints about a Cochrane Review
• Stopping early should be a methodologic quality criterion for Cochrane reviews
• Stopping trials early for benefit is dangerous to the public health
• Stories from the ground: how integrated knowledge translation affected non-communicable disease policy and practice in five African countries
• Story of an epidemic - public health evidence South Asia - creating a social epidemic by experimenting with few
• Storyboarding as a multimodal analytical technique in a qualitative evidence synthesis
• Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE)
• Strategic dissemination of Cochrane Reviews: partnering with specialty journals to enhance exposure through abbreviated articles