• Use of Health Technology Assessment in Clinical Practice Guidelines: a Retrospective Analysis
• Use of i>clicker technology in workshops improves evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) knowledge
• Use of IMMPACT domains in clinical trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a methodological survey
• Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: A survey of Cochrane review authorsá views
• Use of individual patient data vs. published reports in a meta-analysis: the case of ACE-inhibitors in myocardial infarction
• Use of information from summary of findings tables in the clinical practice guidelines development: a pilot study in Colombia
• Use of machine learning to conduct systematic reviews of patient values and preferences in the context of guideline development
• Use of machine-learning tools to support efficient study identification in Cochrane reviews: A case study and cost-effectiveness analysis
• Use of mathematical modelling in WHO guidelines
• Use of medical terminologies to describe adverse event terms in ClinicalTrials.gov
• Use of network meta-analyses in WHO guideline recommendations
• Use of network meta-analysis in guidelines: a retrospective analysis
• Use of non-randomised evidence in Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group's reviews
• Use of observational studies in comparative effectiveness reviews
• Use of outcome data hierarchies to deal with multiplicity in trials: survey of systematic reviews
• Use of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in drug subsidisation decisions
• Use of research evidence in newborn and child health policies and practices in Kenya
• Use of Simulation Scenarios and Vote Cards in Teaching Critical Appraisal of Randomized Controlled Trials
• Use of study design search filters, search strategy quality and reviewers’ screening burden in prognosis, diagnosis and effectiveness systematic reviews
• Use of systematic review evidence to inform local decision-making in the National Health Service: a case study of eating disorders
• Use of systematic reviews and rapid evidence synthesis in setting up National Health Research Priorities in Malaysia
• Use of systematic reviews in a clinical practice guideline on colorectal cancer
• Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines developed by the Brazilian Medical Association
• Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of development of clinical practice guideline by a professional organization in Indonesia
• Use of systematic reviews when adapting guidelines
• Use of the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies (CHARMS) for critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies on medical usage rates in mass gatherings
• Use of the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool in systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine
• Use of the Cochrane Library in Medical Libraries in the United Kingdom.
• Use of the Comments and Criticisms Facility: Pilot experience with new systematic reviews
• Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews of animal studies
• Use of the number needed to treat (NNT) in Cochrane reviews
• Use of the USA food and drug administration web site for clinical trial information from approved therapies
• Use Of The World-Wide-Web To Identify Unpublished Evidence For Systematic Reviews - The Future Role Of The Internet To Improve Information Identification
• Use of tramadol in control of chronic cough: N-of-1 trial
• Use of WOMAC for the Assessment of Treatment Benefit for the Pain of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
• Use R! An introduction to meta-analysis with R
• Use R! An Introduction to Meta-Analysis with R
• Use R! Network meta-analysis with R
• Usefulness of Cochrane Systematic Reviews in health technology assessments in Argentina
• Usefulness of the Cochrane Library to U.S. Primary Care Clinicians.
• User and producer-friendly formatting of Cochrane Reviews
• User engagement in evidence synthesis: A comparative analysis of African labour, housing and conservation policies
• User involvement in the recommendation development process to improve guideline adherence
• User preferences regarding online tools for systematic review and guideline production: Results from a G-I-N Tech Survey
• User-friendly search strategies for geriatric evidence in Medline
• User-involvement in a Cochrane systematic review update: using structured methods to enhance clinical relevance, usefulness and usability
• Users' experiences with the interactive Evidence to Decision framework (iEtD): a qualitative analysis
• Users’ guides to assessing multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
• Using 'Implications for practice’ from Cochrane reviews to promote worldwide improvements in healthcare
• Using ‘chain of evidence’ synthesis for the use of intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset group B streptococcal disease
• Using a bibliometric approach for a clinical question that generates a large volume of literature
• Using a challenge in Cochrane Crowd to involve medical students in evidence production
• Using a co-design approach to increase the awareness, use and engagement of a digital map of COVID-19 recommendations
• Using a collaborative online platform to identify systematic reviews in LILACS
• Using a combined realist and socio-ecological approach to integrating quantitative and qualitative systematic review evidence in a health technology assessment setting
• Using a Distribution-Based Approach and Systematic Review Methods to Derive Minimum Clinically Important Differences
• Using a figure to display characteristics of studies in reviews of complex interventions or reviews with broad questions
• Using a hospital evidence-based practice center (EPC) to inform nursing policy and practice: assessing impact
• Using a hospital evidence-based practice centre (EPC) to inform nursing policy and practice: Describing an approach
• Using a Logic Model Framework Synthesis to map experiences of robotic companion animals in care homes
• Using a matrix analysis to integrate findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis and a review of effectiveness: a worked example
• Using a problem-based learning method for teaching evidence-based medicine in China: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
• Using a sci-fi narrative and medical simulation to design clinical trials in unexpected emergencies
• Using a scoping review to identify promising gender-sensitive health promotion interventions for women
• Using a scoping review to prioritize primary research: impact of simulated patients on first aid training of laypeople
• Using a search filter to improve literature searching efficiency for clinical question updating
• Using a systematic review to develop a taxonomy of uncertainties in health care to structure the design of future participatory research
• Using a theory driven mixed-method review to assess the benefits of complex environmental-health programmes. Cochrane Public Health Group review CD010351
• Using advanced features in the Cochrane Register of Studies
• Using AGREE II to assess the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for Chagas disease
• Using AMSTAR to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis of animal studies in China
• Using AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews: An external validation study
• Using and generating relevant evidence in LMICs by actively engaging stakeholders
• Using arm-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes for generalizability of findings across baseline risk values
• Using automation tools to improve the speed of searching for studies for a systematic review
• Using Bayesian information for matching qualitative and quantitative sources in a mixed studies review
• Using BestEvidence to inform health decisions
• Using bibliometrics to evaluate impact of systematic reviews in disability and rehabilitation research
• Using bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the effects of exercise on pain and disability in osteoarthritis
• Using Children and Adolescents as Standardized Patients in Health: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map
• Using citation-management software for more efficient screening of search results in systematic reviews
• Using Clinical Study Reports versus published articles in a Cochrane Review update
• Using clinical trial data to restore the trial literature: what and how to ‘RIAT’?
• Using co-design to develop reusable learning apps to promote evidence-based healthcare across borders
• Using Cochrane Interactive Learning with students: building a foundation for evidence-based medicine
• Using Cochrane methods to strengthen health policy in Nepal: what is the quality of evidence cited in existing health sector plans?
• Using Cochrane reviews for patient-centred information on the management of low-back pain
• Using Cochrane Reviews in policy agenda setting, choice and implementation
• Using Cochrane reviews to develop consumer information - choosing and presenting outcomes
• Using Cochrane Reviews to ensure best practices to achieve optimal attainment of the Malaysian MDG 4 and 5 mortality indicators
• Using Cochrane reviews to help reduce fetal and other perinatal deaths in high income countries
• Using Cochrane reviews to identify research gaps in the perinatal evidence
• Using Cochrane Reviews to improve critical appraisal skills and clinical decision making in problem-based learning
• Using Cochrane reviews to inform future research
• Using Cochrane Systematic Reviews in real life—experiences from teaching health science students and professionals to access and utilize Cochrane Reviews
• Using crowdsourcing and machine learning for study identification: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Cochrane’s Screen4Me workflow
• Using cumulative meta-analysis methods for prioritizing Cochrane Review updates
• Using directed acyclic graphs as an approach for inclusion criteria of meta-analyses with non-randomized trials
• Using e-mail for identifying unpublished and ongoing clinical trials and those published in non-indexed journals
• Using electronic searching to retrieve additional randomized controlled trials missed by full text searching
• Using EpiData software to extract data for Cochrane systematic reviews
• Using Epistemonikos to create a one-stop shop for systematic reviews in dentistry
• Using EPPI-Reviewer to create a Cochrane Review (workshop in Spanish)
• Using evaluations as learning and programme-improvement tools – Lessons from Uganda
• Using evidence and other perspectives to inform health policy in low- and middle-income countries: nucleic acid amplification tests to detect transfusion transmissible infections in blood donors
• Using evidence beyond an empirically available time horizon: should it be done?
• Using evidence syntheses: views and experiences of public health decision makers and review authors in the United Kingdom
• Using evidence to define policy and influence practice - a case study of the Northern Sydney Fractured Neck of Femur (FNOF) Project
• Using evidence to improve lives: A rapid systematic approach
• Using evidence to make decisions in guideline development: The Evidence to Decision Framework (EtD)
• Using Evidence to nurture multi-actor dialogue in the public sector: Lessons from the Paliament of Uganda
• Using evidence to stop ineffective practice: The UK Cochrane Centre (UKCC) and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) work together
• Using existing guidelines to generate recommendations for promoting physical activity among older people: a GRADE approach
• Using existing systematic reviews to identify the evidence gaps for resilient health systems: a novel methodology
• Using FASD prevalence rates to inform prevention efforts
• Using flow to estimate the percentage contribution of studies in network meta-analysis
• Using full information on cut-offs per study to determine an optimal cut-off in diagnostic test accuracy reviews
• Using games to teach Cochrane concepts
• Using Google Translate for Malay translation of Cochrane plain language summaries: a randomised controlled trial (RCT)
• Using GRADE in public-health guidelines – challenges and some solutions?
• Using GRADE to develop an evidence-based benchmark for a rate: the use case of the patient safety indicator ‘postoperative venous thromboembolism’
• Using GRADE to engage healthcare professionals and managers in shared learning and collaborative development and implementation of local guidelines
• Using GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence in Chinese systematic reviews
• Using GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence in systematic reviews about Chinese traditional medicine
• Using GRADE to integrate randomised and non-randomised studies in systematic reviews
• Using GRADE-CERQual to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses: how well are review authors applying the approach?
• Using GRADEpro to create ‘Summary of Findings’ tables
• Using harmonised results of different tests for a single biomarker in test accuracy meta-analysis
• Using health-technology assessment in universal health coverage: From learning to practice
• Using High Quality Evidence Based Consumer Health Information for Non-therapeutic Patient Advice in Germany.
• Using innovative methods in trial identification for 12 Cochrane Intervention Reviews
• Using IPD meta-analysis to explore health and care inequalities among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people
• Using machine learning as a study design filter for systematic reviews of RCTs
• Using machine learning to automate data extraction from RCTs — hands on with RobotReviewer
• Using machine learning to automate the broad screening process - a research update
• Using machine learning to reduce the systematic review workload
• Using MECIR standards in developing and evaluating Cochrane Reviews of interventions
• Using MECIR standards in the conduct of systematic reviews with emphasis on associated Common Errors—Part 2
• Using MECIR standards in the conduct of systematic reviews, with emphasis on associated common errors
• Using MECIR standards in the interpretation and presentation of results in Cochrane Reviews of interventions – Part 1
• Using meta-study to synthesize the results of qualitative research: the role of theory
• Using Microsoft Academic Graph in a rapid review of reviews on vaccine uptake
• Using Microsoft Academic Graph to maintain Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Registers of controlled trials and economic evaluations
• Using mixed methods to identify successful school-based asthma interventions
• Using mixed-effects meta-analysis to examine the impact of study design, patient characteristics, and treatment intensity in a systematic review of music therapy for serious mental disorders
• Using more than one systematic review as evidence base for a guideline recommendation: Updating the National Disease Management Guideline (NDMG) Asthma
• Using narrative statements to communicate evidence from knowledge syntheses
• Using narratives and storytelling to influence health policy-making: findings and implications from a mixed-methods systematic review
• Using overview of systematic reviews to identify topics for health systems living reviews
• Using patient-important outcomes for systematic reviews: a joint Cochrane and COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) workshop
• Using PICO to establish a framework for a comprehensive clinical guideline
• Using priority setting to enhance the policy relevance of systematic reviews: a case study from the South African Initiative for Systematic Reviews on Health Policies and Systems
• Using ProCite for creating and submitting trials databases to CENTRAL
• Using program theory to understand heterogeneity in systematic effectiveness reviews
• Using purposive sampling within qualitative evidence synthesis: experiences from a Cochrane Review of parents’ views and experiences of vaccination communication
• Using QUADAS-2 in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies: survey of users’ experience
• Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in diverse ways to explore intervention complexity: how two QCA approaches were valuable within a single review
• Using qualitative evidence to inform a review of effectiveness: A case study of integrating qualitative data in a systematic review of effectiveness of ECT for adult depression
• Using qualitative methods to assess impact of public involvement in a UK national lung cancer screening health technology assessment (HTA)
• Using qualitative research to explore heterogeneity in a Cochrane Review
• Using Real-World Evidence to Augment Systematic Review Findings
• Using reference manager (Mendeley) in systematic reviews
• Using Response-adaptive Randomization (RAR) Platform to Explore Potential Effective Treatments during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in China
• Using ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
• Using ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions
• Using RobotReviewer to assist humans in conducting risk of bias assessments—a randomized user study
• Using science, technology, innovation and partnerships to accelerate development outcomes: Identifying priorities for new evidence generation and synthesis
• Using search narratives to explain literature search strategies: a worked example
• Using simple microsimulation to estimate risk difference from a meta-analysis
• Using social media and crowdsourcing to gather important publications for a scoping review about wikis and collaborative writing tools
• Using social media for effective communication
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media for effective communication with Cochrane stakeholders
• Using social media platforms to disseminate Cochrane evidence in China
• Using social media to disseminate translated Cochrane evidence and to promote high-quality health information in non-English speaking regions
• Using SWIFT-Active Screener to reduce the expense of evidence-based toxicology
• Using SWIFT-Active Screener to reduce the expense of evidence-based toxicology
• Using systematic review methods to assess the evidence on performance of measurement instruments in wound care
• Using systematic reviews and prescribing data to analyse off-label drugs use: the case of antiemetics for gastroenteritis in children
• Using systematic reviews to derive science-based products for HIV prevention
• Using systematic reviews to formulate research recommendations
• Using systematic reviews to identify the essential components of interventions: the example of parenting
• Using systematic reviews to study adverse drug reactions: The example of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
• Using systematically synthesised evidence to inform the funding of new clinical trials - the UK Medical Research Council approach
• Using text mining technologies can reduce screening workload in systematic reviews in practice as well as in theory
• Using text mining to facilitate policy relevant systematic reviews
• Using text-mining to develop a U.S.-specific geographic search filter to facilitate systematic reviews in Ovid MEDLINE
• Using the adjusted indirect comparison in a Health Technology Assessment (HTA): clopidogrel versus modified-release dipyridamole
• Using the AMSTAR checklist for network meta-analysis: does it fit?
• Using the AMSTAR checklist for rapid reviews – does it fit?
• Using the capture-recapture technique in systematic literature searches
• Using the Cochrane community site to support Cochrane work
• Using the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CENTRAL) to Identify Clinical Trials in Selected Medical Fields
• Using the Cochrane RCT 'Risk of bias' tool in systematic reviews
• Using the Cochrane Register of Studies to identify the evidence gaps in Cochrane systematic reviews
• Using the Cochrane Register of Studies to studify your Specialised Register
• Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool in systematic reviews
• Using the consultation and scoping process to inform the ‘Implications for research’ section: an example from a suite of Cochrane Reviews on chronic suppurative otitis media
• Using the findings of 'views' studies to explore the findings of effectiveness studies in systematic reviews